First Pro Rider to Buy a Plane??

2/19/2026 3:13pm
RACERX69 wrote:
If I were a pro motocross rider, the absolute last thing I'd ever buy is a turboprop plane of any kind.I'd take the middle seat in...

If I were a pro motocross rider, the absolute last thing I'd ever buy is a turboprop plane of any kind.I'd take the middle seat in the very last row of a packed 737 on a coast-to-coast flight over sitting in the back of my own private turboprop any day. Those things are brutally loud—props blasting that constant low-frequency drone and vibration right through the cabin. You'd end up deafened and completely wiped out from the fatigue after just one long trip. Seriously, even thinking about it exhausts me! Holy hell, no thanks. 

A Fractional jet card or Fractional Ownership would be the only way to go.You get professionally trained crews and top-tier maintenance techs every single time—no skimping on standards. The safety record for reputable fractionals is outstanding, often equaling or even exceeding that of the major airlines  Btw, only the very top riders can afford this type of transportation. Definitely not cheap!

Bud, we wear Bose headsets and listen to our favorite music in the background in between talking to each other.  Engine/prop noise is not a thing.

8
1
deanwhite51
Posts
2678
Joined
10/5/2017
Location
Sydney AU
2/19/2026 3:21pm
RACERX69 wrote:
If I were a pro motocross rider, the absolute last thing I'd ever buy is a turboprop plane of any kind.I'd take the middle seat in...

If I were a pro motocross rider, the absolute last thing I'd ever buy is a turboprop plane of any kind.I'd take the middle seat in the very last row of a packed 737 on a coast-to-coast flight over sitting in the back of my own private turboprop any day. Those things are brutally loud—props blasting that constant low-frequency drone and vibration right through the cabin. You'd end up deafened and completely wiped out from the fatigue after just one long trip. Seriously, even thinking about it exhausts me! Holy hell, no thanks. 

A Fractional jet card or Fractional Ownership would be the only way to go.You get professionally trained crews and top-tier maintenance techs every single time—no skimping on standards. The safety record for reputable fractionals is outstanding, often equaling or even exceeding that of the major airlines  Btw, only the very top riders can afford this type of transportation. Definitely not cheap!

Bud, we wear Bose headsets and listen to our favorite music in the background in between talking to each other.  Engine/prop noise is not a thing.

100% you either don't hear it or the sound becomes a relaxing white noise hahaha

3
1
2/19/2026 3:21pm
There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a...

There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a maintenance plan/records/inspections so I wouldn't worry about a plane that's 25yrs old with low hours.  In fact, my buddy who owns the TBM upgraded to the latest/greatest how he's fuming in recent months because they put too much "trial" tech into it and he has to fly it to Camarillo to have service done on it (down time).  He's almost over completely over it now and wishes he had not sold his older plane that had much nicer finishes inside compared to the new one.  The older plane was more "hands on" which he prefers, while the new one has too much "autopilot" feel to him with all the tech that's causing the mandatory maintenance.  

From what I see, a nice 20yr old aircraft is the sweet spot for value, because you can pay 2-3x more for a new one and not gain much performance or efficiency.

Borg and the pilots here might disagree, but I feel safest in a single turbo prop because my friends have shown me how easily they glide over Baja.   I konw jets can glide, but I wouldn't want to try it.  The jet also seems so much more sensitive to speed/timing on approaches compared to the turbo props.  Things are happening much quicker in the jet and I can feel the stress on the approaches.

Thanks for the info. The only thing I know about private jets is my irrational fear of them. 🤣 

1
jmo443
Posts
1840
Joined
4/5/2019
Location
NY US
2/19/2026 3:28pm
plowboy wrote:

So not a pilot...just crazy.🙃

I've thought about getting my license many times, but if I can't fly at least once every 2 weeks then it's not worth it.  A good...

I've thought about getting my license many times, but if I can't fly at least once every 2 weeks then it's not worth it.  A good pilot is someone who flies very very often, and not once every 2-3 months.  I'll let my buddies keep busy with all the flight plans and paperwork, while I enjoy the flight in the co-pilot seat.

TeamGreen wrote:

Kinda like owning a boat. 🤣

This right here all day. If you have a boat or a plane and I’m invited tell me what to do and how much the fuel was for the day. That’s the cheapest way to get on the water or in the air and honestly the most enjoyable for me. 

1
1

The Shop

2/19/2026 3:28pm
There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a...

There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a maintenance plan/records/inspections so I wouldn't worry about a plane that's 25yrs old with low hours.  In fact, my buddy who owns the TBM upgraded to the latest/greatest how he's fuming in recent months because they put too much "trial" tech into it and he has to fly it to Camarillo to have service done on it (down time).  He's almost over completely over it now and wishes he had not sold his older plane that had much nicer finishes inside compared to the new one.  The older plane was more "hands on" which he prefers, while the new one has too much "autopilot" feel to him with all the tech that's causing the mandatory maintenance.  

From what I see, a nice 20yr old aircraft is the sweet spot for value, because you can pay 2-3x more for a new one and not gain much performance or efficiency.

Borg and the pilots here might disagree, but I feel safest in a single turbo prop because my friends have shown me how easily they glide over Baja.   I konw jets can glide, but I wouldn't want to try it.  The jet also seems so much more sensitive to speed/timing on approaches compared to the turbo props.  Things are happening much quicker in the jet and I can feel the stress on the approaches.

TheMilkman wrote:

Thanks for the info. The only thing I know about private jets is my irrational fear of them. 🤣 

It's always usually pilot error...from pilots who don't fly enough.  It's not often the hardware, and when it is an experienced pilot can often work through it, unless you don't have enough altitude.  However, I would never fly in a piston slapper unless I absolutely have to, like in Alaska or similar.  Failures on turbines and turboprops are very very rare.

Speaking of which, has anyone heard the cause of the crash Greg Biffle's family was on?  Originally I heard a rumor about possibly forgetting to close a cargo door or something, but I'm not sure if that was true and I haven't followed up on the cause yet, if it's known.

2
2
RACERX69
Posts
1160
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
San Antonio, TX US
2/19/2026 4:18pm Edited Date/Time 2/19/2026 4:23pm
RACERX69 wrote:
If I were a pro motocross rider, the absolute last thing I'd ever buy is a turboprop plane of any kind.I'd take the middle seat in...

If I were a pro motocross rider, the absolute last thing I'd ever buy is a turboprop plane of any kind.I'd take the middle seat in the very last row of a packed 737 on a coast-to-coast flight over sitting in the back of my own private turboprop any day. Those things are brutally loud—props blasting that constant low-frequency drone and vibration right through the cabin. You'd end up deafened and completely wiped out from the fatigue after just one long trip. Seriously, even thinking about it exhausts me! Holy hell, no thanks. 

A Fractional jet card or Fractional Ownership would be the only way to go.You get professionally trained crews and top-tier maintenance techs every single time—no skimping on standards. The safety record for reputable fractionals is outstanding, often equaling or even exceeding that of the major airlines  Btw, only the very top riders can afford this type of transportation. Definitely not cheap!

Bud, we wear Bose headsets and listen to our favorite music in the background in between talking to each other.  Engine/prop noise is not a thing.

Ha! Okay. Wearing a Bose headset for a few hours in the cockpit of a PC-12, King Air, etc..is one thing. However, If I'm the owner, sitting in the back, I'm not wearing a Bose headset to remain comfortable. 

Run the numbers using current wintertime headwinds from Daytona, FL to Orange County, CA and compare a PC-12 to a midsize corporate jet. The PC-12 can’t make the trip nonstop, while the jet can. Even without factoring in a fuel stop, the PC-12 would take about 9 hours, whereas the jet is just over 5. Add the required stop, and the PC-12 is pushing close to 10 hours—flying through weather and headwinds, dealing with cabin noise, etc. A Bose headset after 9+ hours would feel like a vice grip. Like I said before… no thanks. I'm thinking Jet and Hunter would feel the same.

3
2
2/19/2026 4:24pm
A plane can cost from 60K to 60M+ and everything in between depending on what they get.  And it's usually not a "smart" investment unless you...

A plane can cost from 60K to 60M+ and everything in between depending on what they get.  And it's usually not a "smart" investment unless you use it very often and fly it yourself.  But if Cochrane's Dad is sharing it with them and going to fly for free, then it could be worthwhile to go in on it.  Otherwise, if you haven't heard the saying, "if it flies, floats, or fucks, rent it".  

Great points. I always say “if I don’t have to feed em, fuck em, or pay their bills, I don’t care what they do” 

1
2/19/2026 4:35pm
RACERX69 wrote:
If I were a pro motocross rider, the absolute last thing I'd ever buy is a turboprop plane of any kind.I'd take the middle seat in...

If I were a pro motocross rider, the absolute last thing I'd ever buy is a turboprop plane of any kind.I'd take the middle seat in the very last row of a packed 737 on a coast-to-coast flight over sitting in the back of my own private turboprop any day. Those things are brutally loud—props blasting that constant low-frequency drone and vibration right through the cabin. You'd end up deafened and completely wiped out from the fatigue after just one long trip. Seriously, even thinking about it exhausts me! Holy hell, no thanks. 

A Fractional jet card or Fractional Ownership would be the only way to go.You get professionally trained crews and top-tier maintenance techs every single time—no skimping on standards. The safety record for reputable fractionals is outstanding, often equaling or even exceeding that of the major airlines  Btw, only the very top riders can afford this type of transportation. Definitely not cheap!

Bud, we wear Bose headsets and listen to our favorite music in the background in between talking to each other.  Engine/prop noise is not a thing.

RACERX69 wrote:
Ha! Okay. Wearing a Bose headset for a few hours in the cockpit of a PC-12, King Air, etc..is one thing. However, If I'm the owner...

Ha! Okay. Wearing a Bose headset for a few hours in the cockpit of a PC-12, King Air, etc..is one thing. However, If I'm the owner, sitting in the back, I'm not wearing a Bose headset to remain comfortable. 

Run the numbers using current wintertime headwinds from Daytona, FL to Orange County, CA and compare a PC-12 to a midsize corporate jet. The PC-12 can’t make the trip nonstop, while the jet can. Even without factoring in a fuel stop, the PC-12 would take about 9 hours, whereas the jet is just over 5. Add the required stop, and the PC-12 is pushing close to 10 hours—flying through weather and headwinds, dealing with cabin noise, etc. A Bose headset after 9+ hours would feel like a vice grip. Like I said before… no thanks. I'm thinking Jet and Hunter would feel the same.

Yes, agreed flying from Seattle to Miami is not ideal, and like I said they will probably buy an old jet if they actually buy something.  If they decided on a turbo prop they could run a hybrid schedule and run charter jets for the cross country flights.  As for the headsets, everyone in the plane has access to a nice Bose headset, front and back.  Even then, if you don't want to wear them and you want to sleep it's not obnoxious like you think it is.  You can have conversation in the back just fine with others if you aren't wearing the headsets.

1
1
Gworm
Posts
2715
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO US
2/19/2026 4:36pm
There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a...

There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a maintenance plan/records/inspections so I wouldn't worry about a plane that's 25yrs old with low hours.  In fact, my buddy who owns the TBM upgraded to the latest/greatest how he's fuming in recent months because they put too much "trial" tech into it and he has to fly it to Camarillo to have service done on it (down time).  He's almost over completely over it now and wishes he had not sold his older plane that had much nicer finishes inside compared to the new one.  The older plane was more "hands on" which he prefers, while the new one has too much "autopilot" feel to him with all the tech that's causing the mandatory maintenance.  

From what I see, a nice 20yr old aircraft is the sweet spot for value, because you can pay 2-3x more for a new one and not gain much performance or efficiency.

Borg and the pilots here might disagree, but I feel safest in a single turbo prop because my friends have shown me how easily they glide over Baja.   I konw jets can glide, but I wouldn't want to try it.  The jet also seems so much more sensitive to speed/timing on approaches compared to the turbo props.  Things are happening much quicker in the jet and I can feel the stress on the approaches.

You are correct about lots of decent old planes. But… you need to be VERY careful with a good pre-buy inspection, and know what maintenance is coming due. And if they are on an engine program  

I’ve know of well maintained, airworthy planes that had maintenance coming up that would cost substantially more than the plane was worth, to keep them airworthy  

I bet Plowboy could chime in on that as well  

 

3
lukaitis9
Posts
1078
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Brick, NJ US
2/19/2026 4:38pm

 

2
2/19/2026 4:52pm
There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a...

There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a maintenance plan/records/inspections so I wouldn't worry about a plane that's 25yrs old with low hours.  In fact, my buddy who owns the TBM upgraded to the latest/greatest how he's fuming in recent months because they put too much "trial" tech into it and he has to fly it to Camarillo to have service done on it (down time).  He's almost over completely over it now and wishes he had not sold his older plane that had much nicer finishes inside compared to the new one.  The older plane was more "hands on" which he prefers, while the new one has too much "autopilot" feel to him with all the tech that's causing the mandatory maintenance.  

From what I see, a nice 20yr old aircraft is the sweet spot for value, because you can pay 2-3x more for a new one and not gain much performance or efficiency.

Borg and the pilots here might disagree, but I feel safest in a single turbo prop because my friends have shown me how easily they glide over Baja.   I konw jets can glide, but I wouldn't want to try it.  The jet also seems so much more sensitive to speed/timing on approaches compared to the turbo props.  Things are happening much quicker in the jet and I can feel the stress on the approaches.

Gworm wrote:
You are correct about lots of decent old planes. But… you need to be VERY careful with a good pre-buy inspection, and know what maintenance is...

You are correct about lots of decent old planes. But… you need to be VERY careful with a good pre-buy inspection, and know what maintenance is coming due. And if they are on an engine program  

I’ve know of well maintained, airworthy planes that had maintenance coming up that would cost substantially more than the plane was worth, to keep them airworthy  

I bet Plowboy could chime in on that as well  

 

Ha, yes I know there are two sides of that, knowing when to off your plane at the right time, avoiding those costly upcoming overhauls.  I've heard those horror stories of people getting a great deal, that soon cost them a fortune with a complete overhaul.  Bottom line is, that's why I say rent as there is no inexpensive way to own/store/insure/maintain/fly your aircraft.  It's for big ballers who can use the write offs, unless you are going to do something like K'dub which is still expensive to most people.

1
1
2/19/2026 4:57pm
There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a...

There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a maintenance plan/records/inspections so I wouldn't worry about a plane that's 25yrs old with low hours.  In fact, my buddy who owns the TBM upgraded to the latest/greatest how he's fuming in recent months because they put too much "trial" tech into it and he has to fly it to Camarillo to have service done on it (down time).  He's almost over completely over it now and wishes he had not sold his older plane that had much nicer finishes inside compared to the new one.  The older plane was more "hands on" which he prefers, while the new one has too much "autopilot" feel to him with all the tech that's causing the mandatory maintenance.  

From what I see, a nice 20yr old aircraft is the sweet spot for value, because you can pay 2-3x more for a new one and not gain much performance or efficiency.

Borg and the pilots here might disagree, but I feel safest in a single turbo prop because my friends have shown me how easily they glide over Baja.   I konw jets can glide, but I wouldn't want to try it.  The jet also seems so much more sensitive to speed/timing on approaches compared to the turbo props.  Things are happening much quicker in the jet and I can feel the stress on the approaches.

Gworm wrote:
You are correct about lots of decent old planes. But… you need to be VERY careful with a good pre-buy inspection, and know what maintenance is...

You are correct about lots of decent old planes. But… you need to be VERY careful with a good pre-buy inspection, and know what maintenance is coming due. And if they are on an engine program  

I’ve know of well maintained, airworthy planes that had maintenance coming up that would cost substantially more than the plane was worth, to keep them airworthy  

I bet Plowboy could chime in on that as well  

 

Are you flying for a private charter company, or commercial?  And how often do you fly?  I remember somewhere you posted some shots from up in the air here somewhere.

1
Gworm
Posts
2715
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO US
2/19/2026 5:05pm Edited Date/Time 2/19/2026 5:12pm
Are you flying for a private charter company, or commercial?  And how often do you fly?  I remember somewhere you posted some shots from up in...

Are you flying for a private charter company, or commercial?  And how often do you fly?  I remember somewhere you posted some shots from up in the air here somewhere.

I fly corporate. The best way to go in my opinion. It’s a family owned company, and no expense is spared on maintenance. Always safety first. 

Edit: we fly about 350 hrs a year on average. We’ve had years where we were over 500 hrs. Right now, we have 1 plane, a Lear 45 and 3 pilots. We are adding a Praetor 500 due Q4 this year, and will be adding a pilot or two.  

3
2/19/2026 5:42pm
Are you flying for a private charter company, or commercial?  And how often do you fly?  I remember somewhere you posted some shots from up in...

Are you flying for a private charter company, or commercial?  And how often do you fly?  I remember somewhere you posted some shots from up in the air here somewhere.

Gworm wrote:
I fly corporate. The best way to go in my opinion. It’s a family owned company, and no expense is spared on maintenance. Always safety first. Edit...

I fly corporate. The best way to go in my opinion. It’s a family owned company, and no expense is spared on maintenance. Always safety first. 

Edit: we fly about 350 hrs a year on average. We’ve had years where we were over 500 hrs. Right now, we have 1 plane, a Lear 45 and 3 pilots. We are adding a Praetor 500 due Q4 this year, and will be adding a pilot or two.  

Nice, that Praetor 500 will get you from Seattle to Miami without a stop, and in pure luxury, but it will cost you a cool 17 million.  Now that I'm looking, there are not many small private jets that can make that trip without a fuel stop.  That's a task for the midsize and the big boys to handle. 

2
1
bigk218
Posts
1450
Joined
1/2/2018
Location
Summerville, SC US
2/19/2026 5:46pm
-MAVERICK- wrote:

Does Barcia have his own plane or just his pilot's license?

I think he has or had a SR22

2
1
Gworm
Posts
2715
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO US
2/19/2026 5:56pm
-MAVERICK- wrote:

Does Barcia have his own plane or just his pilot's license?

bigk218 wrote:

I think he has or had a SR22

Is that a 280 avatar pic?

2/19/2026 6:05pm
Are you flying for a private charter company, or commercial?  And how often do you fly?  I remember somewhere you posted some shots from up in...

Are you flying for a private charter company, or commercial?  And how often do you fly?  I remember somewhere you posted some shots from up in the air here somewhere.

Gworm wrote:
I fly corporate. The best way to go in my opinion. It’s a family owned company, and no expense is spared on maintenance. Always safety first. Edit...

I fly corporate. The best way to go in my opinion. It’s a family owned company, and no expense is spared on maintenance. Always safety first. 

Edit: we fly about 350 hrs a year on average. We’ve had years where we were over 500 hrs. Right now, we have 1 plane, a Lear 45 and 3 pilots. We are adding a Praetor 500 due Q4 this year, and will be adding a pilot or two.  

That Praetor 500 is amazing, hopefully you are the one flying it.  This cockpit looks naked to me without the yokes.  Is this the direction everything is headed, or is this just a preference to have joysticks?

Screenshot 2026-02-19 at 6.00.49%E2%80%AFPM
1
jmo443
Posts
1840
Joined
4/5/2019
Location
NY US
2/19/2026 6:11pm
pummel wrote:
Here's how you do it "PJ"..   In case anyone didn't know the lead singer is the pilot!
Hq3Z4xks2SmcHTcCEc8at3.jpg?VersionId=ChE  4Yb.mESr

Here's how you do it "PJ"..   In case anyone didn't know the lead singer is the pilot!

Imagine the partying that went on, on this thing! That’s the only thing I like about not owning a plane or boat. You can relax and have a drink or too and have ZERO worries. Another reason you want to keep the pilot/captain happy so you are invited again. 

1
1
Gworm
Posts
2715
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO US
2/19/2026 6:18pm
That Praetor 500 is amazing, hopefully you are the one flying it.  This cockpit looks naked to me without the yokes.  Is this the direction everything...

That Praetor 500 is amazing, hopefully you are the one flying it.  This cockpit looks naked to me without the yokes.  Is this the direction everything is headed, or is this just a preference to have joysticks?

Screenshot 2026-02-19 at 6.00.49%E2%80%AFPM

Yes, I’ll be flying it and the Lear.  I go to school in August. 

4
Wandell
Posts
7783
Joined
12/17/2008
Location
Cairo, GA US
2/19/2026 6:28pm

RC HAD A PILOT FOR A WHILEBUT I DONT KNOW IF HE OWNED THE PLANE, RENTED OR LEASED IT BECAUSE I NEVER ASKED. THE GUY WAS REALLY COOL AND DURING THE WEEK HE WOULD HOP ON RCS JOHN DEERE TRACTOR AND SPEND MOST OF THE DAY MOWING AT THE GOAT FARM WHICH IS A NEVER ENDING CHORE IN SOUTH GA!

2
3
kennyc
Posts
189
Joined
5/9/2012
Location
Liberty Hill, TX US
Fantasy
2/19/2026 6:49pm

Just a note.... I ran into AP7 and KP at the Orlando airport as they were getting on a Southwest flight to fly to DFW.  I talked to them for a few minutes as we were waiting on the tram, and they were very nice and courteous with their time.

8
plowboy
Posts
14057
Joined
1/3/2010
Location
Norwich, KS US
2/19/2026 8:14pm
There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a...

There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a maintenance plan/records/inspections so I wouldn't worry about a plane that's 25yrs old with low hours.  In fact, my buddy who owns the TBM upgraded to the latest/greatest how he's fuming in recent months because they put too much "trial" tech into it and he has to fly it to Camarillo to have service done on it (down time).  He's almost over completely over it now and wishes he had not sold his older plane that had much nicer finishes inside compared to the new one.  The older plane was more "hands on" which he prefers, while the new one has too much "autopilot" feel to him with all the tech that's causing the mandatory maintenance.  

From what I see, a nice 20yr old aircraft is the sweet spot for value, because you can pay 2-3x more for a new one and not gain much performance or efficiency.

Borg and the pilots here might disagree, but I feel safest in a single turbo prop because my friends have shown me how easily they glide over Baja.   I konw jets can glide, but I wouldn't want to try it.  The jet also seems so much more sensitive to speed/timing on approaches compared to the turbo props.  Things are happening much quicker in the jet and I can feel the stress on the approaches.

Gworm wrote:
You are correct about lots of decent old planes. But… you need to be VERY careful with a good pre-buy inspection, and know what maintenance is...

You are correct about lots of decent old planes. But… you need to be VERY careful with a good pre-buy inspection, and know what maintenance is coming due. And if they are on an engine program  

I’ve know of well maintained, airworthy planes that had maintenance coming up that would cost substantially more than the plane was worth, to keep them airworthy  

I bet Plowboy could chime in on that as well  

 

Like Bomber said...if you wanna buy a plane and keep it legal and safe...you best be a baller.  I do have a couple of friends with small planes but the only reason they can afford them is because they are A&P's with their IA.  Even with free labor the parts are hella expensive.  There ain't no Chinese knockoffs.

4
plowboy
Posts
14057
Joined
1/3/2010
Location
Norwich, KS US
2/19/2026 8:37pm
There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a...

There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a maintenance plan/records/inspections so I wouldn't worry about a plane that's 25yrs old with low hours.  In fact, my buddy who owns the TBM upgraded to the latest/greatest how he's fuming in recent months because they put too much "trial" tech into it and he has to fly it to Camarillo to have service done on it (down time).  He's almost over completely over it now and wishes he had not sold his older plane that had much nicer finishes inside compared to the new one.  The older plane was more "hands on" which he prefers, while the new one has too much "autopilot" feel to him with all the tech that's causing the mandatory maintenance.  

From what I see, a nice 20yr old aircraft is the sweet spot for value, because you can pay 2-3x more for a new one and not gain much performance or efficiency.

Borg and the pilots here might disagree, but I feel safest in a single turbo prop because my friends have shown me how easily they glide over Baja.   I konw jets can glide, but I wouldn't want to try it.  The jet also seems so much more sensitive to speed/timing on approaches compared to the turbo props.  Things are happening much quicker in the jet and I can feel the stress on the approaches.

TheMilkman wrote:

Thanks for the info. The only thing I know about private jets is my irrational fear of them. 🤣 

It's always usually pilot error...from pilots who don't fly enough.  It's not often the hardware, and when it is an experienced pilot can often work through...

It's always usually pilot error...from pilots who don't fly enough.  It's not often the hardware, and when it is an experienced pilot can often work through it, unless you don't have enough altitude.  However, I would never fly in a piston slapper unless I absolutely have to, like in Alaska or similar.  Failures on turbines and turboprops are very very rare.

Speaking of which, has anyone heard the cause of the crash Greg Biffle's family was on?  Originally I heard a rumor about possibly forgetting to close a cargo door or something, but I'm not sure if that was true and I haven't followed up on the cause yet, if it's known.

I listened to the FAA report, which didn't really give a definitive "cause".  A number of bad choices and damn bad luck was the general takeaway.

The pilot was type rated but did not have single pilot certification.  He let his son fly right seat. The son didn't have much time on his prop only license. 

The first engine didn't start but the other engine did.  They were using ship power.  (The old Cessna's have a starter generator so you better have a hot battery.

This led to the next mistake.  They forgot to switch the generators on after engine start so they were running off emergency/stdby battery for instruments.  When that battery died they lost the cockpit.

CVR sounds like Greg told them about the generator switches from the cabin.  By the time they started to get things figured out...the weather had turned to shit and there seemed to be a fairly large altimeter discrepancy. 

They did mention the pilot may have had "Celebrity Fog".  All around bad deal.

8
truck
Posts
3545
Joined
6/10/2015
Location
Louisville, KY US
Fantasy
2/19/2026 8:46pm
There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a...

There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a maintenance plan/records/inspections so I wouldn't worry about a plane that's 25yrs old with low hours.  In fact, my buddy who owns the TBM upgraded to the latest/greatest how he's fuming in recent months because they put too much "trial" tech into it and he has to fly it to Camarillo to have service done on it (down time).  He's almost over completely over it now and wishes he had not sold his older plane that had much nicer finishes inside compared to the new one.  The older plane was more "hands on" which he prefers, while the new one has too much "autopilot" feel to him with all the tech that's causing the mandatory maintenance.  

From what I see, a nice 20yr old aircraft is the sweet spot for value, because you can pay 2-3x more for a new one and not gain much performance or efficiency.

Borg and the pilots here might disagree, but I feel safest in a single turbo prop because my friends have shown me how easily they glide over Baja.   I konw jets can glide, but I wouldn't want to try it.  The jet also seems so much more sensitive to speed/timing on approaches compared to the turbo props.  Things are happening much quicker in the jet and I can feel the stress on the approaches.

TheMilkman wrote:

Thanks for the info. The only thing I know about private jets is my irrational fear of them. 🤣 

It's always usually pilot error...from pilots who don't fly enough.  It's not often the hardware, and when it is an experienced pilot can often work through...

It's always usually pilot error...from pilots who don't fly enough.  It's not often the hardware, and when it is an experienced pilot can often work through it, unless you don't have enough altitude.  However, I would never fly in a piston slapper unless I absolutely have to, like in Alaska or similar.  Failures on turbines and turboprops are very very rare.

Speaking of which, has anyone heard the cause of the crash Greg Biffle's family was on?  Originally I heard a rumor about possibly forgetting to close a cargo door or something, but I'm not sure if that was true and I haven't followed up on the cause yet, if it's known.

Swiss cheese. Have paid attention because I'm a cleetus mcfarland fan. 

https://youtu.be/ibYHHw1iIhs?si=UBeE1AfKj8EU2wPO

 

2
1
Tabarnac
Posts
9
Joined
1/7/2022
Location
CA
2/19/2026 9:45pm

Re : it’s usually pilot error.

Three years ago (at age 69), some moran idiot I was lapping at a NYOA race impaled me with his handlebar and blew up my gut. Post-op, I was eventually Med-Evac’d from a trauma center in Pensylvania back home to Montreal in a Pilatus turbo-prop. Cool plane, or so I thought. Once laying in a Montreal-area hospital room, I googled Pilatus to show my wife a picture of the plane. First thing that came up was a report of a Pilatus recently exploding mid-flight, killing all aboard.


I dunno, man,,,

1
2
mxaniac
Posts
528
Joined
9/9/2019
Location
Airway Heights, WA US
2/19/2026 10:17pm
Bob Hannah had a plane but it was a small personal plane but I don't know if he flew it to the races. Years ago he...

Bob Hannah had a plane but it was a small personal plane but I don't know if he flew it to the races. Years ago he took Gene Ritchie and I to his hanger when we were staying at his house elk hunting. 

He's still flying and selling planes as a Broker.

He flew in to Fairfield WA at a vintage race about 2 years ago. I got to BS with him a bit. The planes they flew in on were pretty cool, able to go so slow and graceful, then plop down in a field.

1
mx691
Posts
897
Joined
6/27/2008
Location
Stockholm SE
Fantasy
2/20/2026 12:02am Edited Date/Time 2/20/2026 12:08am

4:15 in:


IMG 5570 0

3
larryloopout
Posts
68
Joined
11/18/2009
Location
Manahawkin, NJ US
2/20/2026 12:34am
There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a...

There are plenty of great "old" aircraft out there from OCD owners who kept all their maintenance logs clean and tidy.  All the aircraft require a maintenance plan/records/inspections so I wouldn't worry about a plane that's 25yrs old with low hours.  In fact, my buddy who owns the TBM upgraded to the latest/greatest how he's fuming in recent months because they put too much "trial" tech into it and he has to fly it to Camarillo to have service done on it (down time).  He's almost over completely over it now and wishes he had not sold his older plane that had much nicer finishes inside compared to the new one.  The older plane was more "hands on" which he prefers, while the new one has too much "autopilot" feel to him with all the tech that's causing the mandatory maintenance.  

From what I see, a nice 20yr old aircraft is the sweet spot for value, because you can pay 2-3x more for a new one and not gain much performance or efficiency.

Borg and the pilots here might disagree, but I feel safest in a single turbo prop because my friends have shown me how easily they glide over Baja.   I konw jets can glide, but I wouldn't want to try it.  The jet also seems so much more sensitive to speed/timing on approaches compared to the turbo props.  Things are happening much quicker in the jet and I can feel the stress on the approaches.

TheMilkman wrote:

Thanks for the info. The only thing I know about private jets is my irrational fear of them. 🤣 

It's always usually pilot error...from pilots who don't fly enough.  It's not often the hardware, and when it is an experienced pilot can often work through...

It's always usually pilot error...from pilots who don't fly enough.  It's not often the hardware, and when it is an experienced pilot can often work through it, unless you don't have enough altitude.  However, I would never fly in a piston slapper unless I absolutely have to, like in Alaska or similar.  Failures on turbines and turboprops are very very rare.

Speaking of which, has anyone heard the cause of the crash Greg Biffle's family was on?  Originally I heard a rumor about possibly forgetting to close a cargo door or something, but I'm not sure if that was true and I haven't followed up on the cause yet, if it's known.

It appears Biffles crash was caused by pilot error / not certified copilot. They allegedly lost left seat avionics possibly caused by dead batteries by not having the generator on.  The copilot was the pilots young son who was not certified so when he got control of the aircraft he didn’t know proper procedures.  They turned back and had the gear down and full flaps which that jet couldn’t handle.  They lost airspeed and basically flew it into the ground.  Very sad and appears to have been completely avoidable 

7

Post a reply to: First Pro Rider to Buy a Plane??

The Latest