Another reason local racing has low numbers

Spike33
Posts
396
Joined
1/6/2024
Location
Malibu, CA US
1/31/2026 12:54pm
He can still race the 125 class right in Wi. Right ?  He should do the premix 125-150 class at the Canadian nationals. Deshchambault is a...

He can still race the 125 class right in Wi. Right ?  He should do the premix 125-150 class at the Canadian nationals. Deshchambault is a week long practice & 3 motos. With premix & pro national on Sunday. 

Exactly 

1
2
vdrsnk04
Posts
1995
Joined
9/5/2018
Location
IL US
1/31/2026 12:56pm
yak651 wrote:
To bring this back to the topic title, the problem I have is we often say local racing is dieing, or no fast guys show up...

To bring this back to the topic title, the problem I have is we often say local racing is dieing, or no fast guys show up. This case shows the reason. If Logan would’ve skipped the local races and just rode at a facility he would be eligible for the class and this wouldn’t even be a topic. He would be racing B class as planned as his results at big races had him no where near dominate. But because he won a 15-20 rider local B class he now has to race A class at 17 years old and the kids that ran top ten in 250B limited in ‘25 will be eligible for 250B at LL this summer

That’s what I was trying to get at. It doesn’t matter if a person rides local and national big races, or a guy only does national big races and trains at a facility otherwise or what their age or size is. Since he won local B he is an A rider no matter where he goes. 

Like I’ll use me for an example. I race +30A hare scramble and do well, now when I go do motocross I also must race +30A and I don’t do as well not even close. Then if I race nationally I would also race +30A. 

It’s how it is and I do agree with that part. To me your friend’s kid should be A moving forward. The other kids you talk about only race the big races and trains otherwise at a facility that’s their plan and it works. Every system has loopholes like it or not, and people play them.  Also their are plenty of guys younger then 17 that ride pro classes. 

1
2
themx11
Posts
169
Joined
6/7/2025
Location
Atlanta, GA US
1/31/2026 1:17pm

 oh well. he will ironically be with safer riders in A. if he's fast enough it wont matter. 

9
1
1/31/2026 1:23pm

Hear me out….why is this dude worried about his son’s safety in the A class vs B? The lap times at area and regional qualifiers are about the same.  If anything there are fewer people on the gate in A class with more experience.  It’s not more dangerous in the A class.  Not at all.  I practice with A class as a +30 A guy rather than Vet A/B practice all the time because there are like 7 guys on the track who all know how to hold their line and ride smart.

11
3

The Shop

Bow977
Posts
601
Joined
1/19/2021
Location
Bakersfield, CA US
Fantasy
1/31/2026 2:51pm

at the end of the day if he is fast enough it will all work out 

13
2
cwel11
Posts
2560
Joined
12/4/2019
Location
Orangeville, PA US
1/31/2026 3:00pm

He’ll probably file an appeal and get bumped back to b class anyway so most of this is a moot point. That being said I’ve railed against the class structure for years. Amateur national level “C” class isn’t local “C” class. There needs to be two different standards. For instance C class at an amateur national race = B at a local district race. Or some kind of distinction between the two. I’m not sure how it works or the fine details would look like but the class structure in amateur racing is deeply flawed. My kid got crucified at a helluva lotta races last year in C as a sandbagger but finished mid pack in C at Loretta’s. Make it make sense and stop the constant bickering between riders and parents in the sport we all love. 

2
6
Mx286
Posts
488
Joined
9/5/2011
Location
Owensboro, KY US
1/31/2026 3:07pm
yak651 wrote:
No, I believe at a race or two he was in a race they had two gate drops with A and B due to turnout but...

No, I believe at a race or two he was in a race they had two gate drops with A and B due to turnout but he wasn’t entered in A. His family didn’t game the system and pull off 2nd moto when racing the local classes with low competition so they penalized them for it.

That’s not how it works. More to this story. 

yak651 wrote:

Explain please, I’m trying to understand 

Looking at the AMA results center he had 8 races in Open B where he finished 1st in all 8 of those. Those races averaged his rider point value at 15. If you get 15 or higher it’s an automatic bump to A. Sucks because he’s probably not exactly ready to take on the A class at a national level. That’s why you have to be aware of the rule book. If he had done 4 races in 250B then the other 4 in Open B this probably wouldn’t have been an issue. 

https://results.americanmotorcyclist.com/riders/159712-logan-kresal/res…

13
1
1/31/2026 3:08pm
yak651 wrote:
Local kid in WI, has really improved the last couple years. I didn’t look into the vault but pretty sure the first year he made LL...

Local kid in WI, has really improved the last couple years. I didn’t look into the vault but pretty sure the first year he made LL was in 24 on minis(he might’ve made it in ‘23 so don’t blast me if I’m wrong, but know it was a huge deal to his family that he finally got his ticket when he did). Last year he moved up to 125s and went again in those classes. He has gone to some training camps but wasn’t “living” at them for years. Was cool last year he ran some of our local races and was able to see how much speed he gained over the year. Doing that screwed him over forcing him into the A class. He hasn’t been given a chance to really ride a 250 four stroke as he got his first one this past fall and now can’t run 250B yet kids that only run the big races can run 250B multiple years. I’m all for moving people up but this kid didn’t even have one year to ride 250B at LL? They move kids up under 18 into A but kids under 18 can’t turn pro? Confused by these actions…  IMG 4223 0 

This exact samecthing happened to Kade Johnson.

1
1/31/2026 3:17pm
Bow977 wrote:

at the end of the day if he is fast enough it will all work out 

Yeah, what I was going to say.  In the big picture if the kid has what it takes to turn pro it will likely be the right move anyway.  

3
1
1/31/2026 3:42pm

National level amateur racing should remove skill categories (A,B,C classes) in favor of age only classes.

2
3
2/1/2026 5:05am

How about the kids that are ama 9 that return from Loretta’s on 65’s and get a letter in the mailbox that says


 “ congratulations and welcome to B class “


Probably the best thing that ever happens to them - 

But a bit of a head f too.

 

JB 19
Posts
4329
Joined
3/8/2009
Location
Marion, OH US
2/1/2026 6:31am

As someone who has been racing for over 40 years as well as raced national races in recent years,  the problem is that the LL group of racers have become so far separated from local level racers that there really needs to be a separation of levels.   In the C and B class there should be a local ranking and national ranking.  

 Let these C class sand bagger  move up to B at the local level and then let them race C at the national level.  Because if you go to the national races you would see that they belong in that class at the Lorettas or Mini O's level.   The same with B class.   Let them move up to A at the local level and race B at the national races.    This is the only real fix that exists.   

Now the average local guys aren't in a rage all the time because Jimmy that's out there scrubbing all the jumps in C class is running over their kid, because Jimmy actually is a C class rider at the national level.  And Jimmy isn't ready for the B class at the nationals yet because the current B class at a LL's regional looks like a pro national from 25 years ago.   Don't believe me? Show up at the Red Bud regional this year and watch the speed and technique of the top 20 in the B class.  The Ironman regional last year was insane.  

The sport at the LL's level has become so insanely high that it's almost like a completely different sport than local racing.  Seriously.  You should have a national ranking and local ranking.   Use the current LL's rules for moving people up at the national level, not the local RPV rule. Use RPV only for local level.    This is what fixes the problem with local racing and sand baggers.  

10
5
steveloyer
Posts
255
Joined
11/29/2022
Location
Palmer, AK US
2/1/2026 6:43am Edited Date/Time 2/1/2026 6:44am

lol idk this is weird, we used to run our super minis 12-14 (age) in our pro open class, and 125 A classes, and we/kids/parents wanted to ride with more safer, skilled riders and learn.

 This is a terrible take, MY KIDS NOT SAFE RIDING WITH THE BEST AND MATUREST RIDERS!

Edit: if you are chasing Amateur Nationals, yeah, I see the issue. 
 

1
3
Talan_Hansen
Posts
179
Joined
9/16/2010
Location
Iron Mountain, MI US
2/1/2026 7:11am

He will be okay. He raced a few D16 races and on a 125, he was passing and even beat some really good guys on 450’s that were leading open A. He’s quick, I do see his point at racing a year in B on a 250 but man he’s ridiculously quick. 

5
2
2/1/2026 7:25am
JB 19 wrote:
As someone who has been racing for over 40 years as well as raced national races in recent years,  the problem is that the LL group...

As someone who has been racing for over 40 years as well as raced national races in recent years,  the problem is that the LL group of racers have become so far separated from local level racers that there really needs to be a separation of levels.   In the C and B class there should be a local ranking and national ranking.  

 Let these C class sand bagger  move up to B at the local level and then let them race C at the national level.  Because if you go to the national races you would see that they belong in that class at the Lorettas or Mini O's level.   The same with B class.   Let them move up to A at the local level and race B at the national races.    This is the only real fix that exists.   

Now the average local guys aren't in a rage all the time because Jimmy that's out there scrubbing all the jumps in C class is running over their kid, because Jimmy actually is a C class rider at the national level.  And Jimmy isn't ready for the B class at the nationals yet because the current B class at a LL's regional looks like a pro national from 25 years ago.   Don't believe me? Show up at the Red Bud regional this year and watch the speed and technique of the top 20 in the B class.  The Ironman regional last year was insane.  

The sport at the LL's level has become so insanely high that it's almost like a completely different sport than local racing.  Seriously.  You should have a national ranking and local ranking.   Use the current LL's rules for moving people up at the national level, not the local RPV rule. Use RPV only for local level.    This is what fixes the problem with local racing and sand baggers.  

This .

4
2
sandman768
Posts
7915
Joined
3/21/2014
Location
Saratoga Springs, NY US
2/1/2026 7:34am

This has been going on since the inception of LLynns…contingency and factory B riders just increased the incentives…..nothing new…

3
yak651
Posts
8554
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI US
Fantasy
2/1/2026 7:37am
JB 19 wrote:
As someone who has been racing for over 40 years as well as raced national races in recent years,  the problem is that the LL group...

As someone who has been racing for over 40 years as well as raced national races in recent years,  the problem is that the LL group of racers have become so far separated from local level racers that there really needs to be a separation of levels.   In the C and B class there should be a local ranking and national ranking.  

 Let these C class sand bagger  move up to B at the local level and then let them race C at the national level.  Because if you go to the national races you would see that they belong in that class at the Lorettas or Mini O's level.   The same with B class.   Let them move up to A at the local level and race B at the national races.    This is the only real fix that exists.   

Now the average local guys aren't in a rage all the time because Jimmy that's out there scrubbing all the jumps in C class is running over their kid, because Jimmy actually is a C class rider at the national level.  And Jimmy isn't ready for the B class at the nationals yet because the current B class at a LL's regional looks like a pro national from 25 years ago.   Don't believe me? Show up at the Red Bud regional this year and watch the speed and technique of the top 20 in the B class.  The Ironman regional last year was insane.  

The sport at the LL's level has become so insanely high that it's almost like a completely different sport than local racing.  Seriously.  You should have a national ranking and local ranking.   Use the current LL's rules for moving people up at the national level, not the local RPV rule. Use RPV only for local level.    This is what fixes the problem with local racing and sand baggers.  

This is a good take. If you want fast kids on the LL path to show up to local races you need something like this to make it fair to local only racers and still keep eligibility for the LL bound people. Otherwise expect people to just show up for regionals and qualifiers and you don’t see these other riders until they are over  18 and the dream is over if they haven’t quit riding.

2
3
yamahaha131
Posts
708
Joined
4/7/2010
Location
Newark, OH US
2/1/2026 9:57am

Maybe total unrelated but it reminded me of a recent convo with an ama official. He said he will actually check into guys racing/sandbagging non ama or "outlaw" races and bump them if he finds out they're successfully running a higher skill class than what they run in ama. 

5
1
2/1/2026 10:44am
He will be okay. He raced a few D16 races and on a 125, he was passing and even beat some really good guys on 450’s...

He will be okay. He raced a few D16 races and on a 125, he was passing and even beat some really good guys on 450’s that were leading open A. He’s quick, I do see his point at racing a year in B on a 250 but man he’s ridiculously quick. 

Matty B filmed the Baja Brawl.  Logan dominated top 3 starts , he wanted it bad. When he locks onto the leader to run him down , Very impressive speed.  McGrath from Western Wi. 2 yrs removed from the 125 class he dominated the Millville series. Then b class in 25 & is a A rider now. He was far back in 3rd in 125 at Baja .  He did a few pro ams & did ok.  Sucks that he can’t do 125 b/c at LL he would be a title contender in 26. I would mod the 150 & do the Canadian Nationals & the pro Ams .

3
3
cwel11
Posts
2560
Joined
12/4/2019
Location
Orangeville, PA US
2/1/2026 12:06pm
JB 19 wrote:
As someone who has been racing for over 40 years as well as raced national races in recent years,  the problem is that the LL group...

As someone who has been racing for over 40 years as well as raced national races in recent years,  the problem is that the LL group of racers have become so far separated from local level racers that there really needs to be a separation of levels.   In the C and B class there should be a local ranking and national ranking.  

 Let these C class sand bagger  move up to B at the local level and then let them race C at the national level.  Because if you go to the national races you would see that they belong in that class at the Lorettas or Mini O's level.   The same with B class.   Let them move up to A at the local level and race B at the national races.    This is the only real fix that exists.   

Now the average local guys aren't in a rage all the time because Jimmy that's out there scrubbing all the jumps in C class is running over their kid, because Jimmy actually is a C class rider at the national level.  And Jimmy isn't ready for the B class at the nationals yet because the current B class at a LL's regional looks like a pro national from 25 years ago.   Don't believe me? Show up at the Red Bud regional this year and watch the speed and technique of the top 20 in the B class.  The Ironman regional last year was insane.  

The sport at the LL's level has become so insanely high that it's almost like a completely different sport than local racing.  Seriously.  You should have a national ranking and local ranking.   Use the current LL's rules for moving people up at the national level, not the local RPV rule. Use RPV only for local level.    This is what fixes the problem with local racing and sand baggers.  

100% in agreement w you. If I could’ve put my son in B at our district races and back to C for area, regionals and LL I would’ve gladly done it. We were crucified because I couldn’t afford to go to every amateur national across the country for him to race other “sandbaggers” doing the same. The system we have now sucks, it’s flawed, the AMA and MX sports knows it also but they are dgaf as long as the Benjamins are being stacked. 

4
2
2/1/2026 12:18pm
Hear me out….why is this dude worried about his son’s safety in the A class vs B? The lap times at area and regional qualifiers are...

Hear me out….why is this dude worried about his son’s safety in the A class vs B? The lap times at area and regional qualifiers are about the same.  If anything there are fewer people on the gate in A class with more experience.  It’s not more dangerous in the A class.  Not at all.  I practice with A class as a +30 A guy rather than Vet A/B practice all the time because there are like 7 guys on the track who all know how to hold their line and ride smart.

Its was never about safety, its about they thought they could sandbag and got caught. 

Crazy how people bitch about sandbagging but then bitch when they cant. 😂

5
2/1/2026 12:21pm
cwel11 wrote:
He’ll probably file an appeal and get bumped back to b class anyway so most of this is a moot point. That being said I’ve railed...

He’ll probably file an appeal and get bumped back to b class anyway so most of this is a moot point. That being said I’ve railed against the class structure for years. Amateur national level “C” class isn’t local “C” class. There needs to be two different standards. For instance C class at an amateur national race = B at a local district race. Or some kind of distinction between the two. I’m not sure how it works or the fine details would look like but the class structure in amateur racing is deeply flawed. My kid got crucified at a helluva lotta races last year in C as a sandbagger but finished mid pack in C at Loretta’s. Make it make sense and stop the constant bickering between riders and parents in the sport we all love. 

They said they lost their appeal already, I wonder how many times they can appeal.   

1
3
cwel11
Posts
2560
Joined
12/4/2019
Location
Orangeville, PA US
2/1/2026 12:23pm
cwel11 wrote:
He’ll probably file an appeal and get bumped back to b class anyway so most of this is a moot point. That being said I’ve railed...

He’ll probably file an appeal and get bumped back to b class anyway so most of this is a moot point. That being said I’ve railed against the class structure for years. Amateur national level “C” class isn’t local “C” class. There needs to be two different standards. For instance C class at an amateur national race = B at a local district race. Or some kind of distinction between the two. I’m not sure how it works or the fine details would look like but the class structure in amateur racing is deeply flawed. My kid got crucified at a helluva lotta races last year in C as a sandbagger but finished mid pack in C at Loretta’s. Make it make sense and stop the constant bickering between riders and parents in the sport we all love. 

lostboy819 wrote:

They said they lost their appeal already, I wonder how many times they can appeal.   

Sorry I missed that part 

2
JB 19
Posts
4329
Joined
3/8/2009
Location
Marion, OH US
2/1/2026 1:50pm

I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how far the level has progressed at the national level.  You literally have kids who can't make the top 40 at a regional qualifier where only 6 advance who win at the local level.    They're so much faster than the local C kids  that it isn't really fair so they get called sand baggers, yet they don't make the top 40 at a national race.   Let them race B at local races so the real C riders can have a chance.   

5
2
2/1/2026 2:12pm
JB 19 wrote:
I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how...

I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how far the level has progressed at the national level.  You literally have kids who can't make the top 40 at a regional qualifier where only 6 advance who win at the local level.    They're so much faster than the local C kids  that it isn't really fair so they get called sand baggers, yet they don't make the top 40 at a national race.   Let them race B at local races so the real C riders can have a chance.   

Crazy speed in 125 b/c among the fastest lap times at LL.  Kids that R not quite 125b/c speed race 125c.  The 125 class in Wi. Is there 2nd class of 125 jr.  It not  just Logan that’s fast  as hell in the state.  Didn’t the Mini O,s hv 4 or 5. Qualifiers for 125 b/c. Way back in 18th there ripping.  I think America,s pool of fast 125 riders is way more deep than in Europe right now. And the 125 EMX is stacked with talent . Long over due for a 125 pro am class in America. 

1
4
Timo
Posts
1392
Joined
1/9/2021
Location
Wichita, KS US
2/1/2026 2:36pm
Hear me out….why is this dude worried about his son’s safety in the A class vs B? The lap times at area and regional qualifiers are...

Hear me out….why is this dude worried about his son’s safety in the A class vs B? The lap times at area and regional qualifiers are about the same.  If anything there are fewer people on the gate in A class with more experience.  It’s not more dangerous in the A class.  Not at all.  I practice with A class as a +30 A guy rather than Vet A/B practice all the time because there are like 7 guys on the track who all know how to hold their line and ride smart.

He's worried his kid won't get a trophy and selling the bikes as a tantrum 😂 

5
3
30minmotos
Posts
705
Joined
8/7/2025
Location
Rising Sun , MD US
2/1/2026 2:41pm
JB 19 wrote:
I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how...

I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how far the level has progressed at the national level.  You literally have kids who can't make the top 40 at a regional qualifier where only 6 advance who win at the local level.    They're so much faster than the local C kids  that it isn't really fair so they get called sand baggers, yet they don't make the top 40 at a national race.   Let them race B at local races so the real C riders can have a chance.   

The entire system is a fucking joke. I get what you’re saying but the fact we don’t group classes based on speed but instead based on age, and the lowest class we haven’t been kicked out of yet is insane.


There’s front of pack c class guys going the same speed as back of pack a class. What in the actual fuck are we doing here.


The slowest in a should be faster than the fastest in c, period. Anything else is a fucking joke for all the people who want to race with people their speed.


I watch class after class have like 5-15 people in it and maybe 3 of the people are of similar speed and get to have a good battle. rest are smoking them all or getting smoked, even so bad as lapping people in their same class in a. 4-5 lap race. That’s not racing. That’s a joke.


And then we wonder why nobody wants to race moto.


Motocross CAN be the greatest experience on earth. But how we’re currently doing it for amateurs is a total fucking shame.

4
Timo
Posts
1392
Joined
1/9/2021
Location
Wichita, KS US
2/1/2026 3:16pm
JB 19 wrote:
I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how...

I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how far the level has progressed at the national level.  You literally have kids who can't make the top 40 at a regional qualifier where only 6 advance who win at the local level.    They're so much faster than the local C kids  that it isn't really fair so they get called sand baggers, yet they don't make the top 40 at a national race.   Let them race B at local races so the real C riders can have a chance.   

30minmotos wrote:
The entire system is a fucking joke. I get what you’re saying but the fact we don’t group classes based on speed but instead based on...

The entire system is a fucking joke. I get what you’re saying but the fact we don’t group classes based on speed but instead based on age, and the lowest class we haven’t been kicked out of yet is insane.


There’s front of pack c class guys going the same speed as back of pack a class. What in the actual fuck are we doing here.


The slowest in a should be faster than the fastest in c, period. Anything else is a fucking joke for all the people who want to race with people their speed.


I watch class after class have like 5-15 people in it and maybe 3 of the people are of similar speed and get to have a good battle. rest are smoking them all or getting smoked, even so bad as lapping people in their same class in a. 4-5 lap race. That’s not racing. That’s a joke.


And then we wonder why nobody wants to race moto.


Motocross CAN be the greatest experience on earth. But how we’re currently doing it for amateurs is a total fucking shame.

If you win in c class the next year you should move to b, you win b you should move to a. Pretty easy but there's nothing above a to move to so then johnny gets beat pretty bad and wants to move back down so he can be a winner again. 

I made my kid start in peewee A because he'd learn faster if the kids he was racing were better than him. He got beat pretty badly for most of the season, but came out and won the last race we did, by a significant margin. I guarantee he's better now than if I had let him rip peewee C and win every race. He was upset and a little beat down after the first couple races, but I used it as a learning experience because life doesn't always work out the way you want. We don't cry about it or throw a fit, just put your head down and try to enjoy the ride. Hopefully when he's grown he'll be a better man than me. 

2
4
yak651
Posts
8554
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI US
Fantasy
2/1/2026 3:22pm
JB 19 wrote:
I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how...

I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how far the level has progressed at the national level.  You literally have kids who can't make the top 40 at a regional qualifier where only 6 advance who win at the local level.    They're so much faster than the local C kids  that it isn't really fair so they get called sand baggers, yet they don't make the top 40 at a national race.   Let them race B at local races so the real C riders can have a chance.   

30minmotos wrote:
The entire system is a fucking joke. I get what you’re saying but the fact we don’t group classes based on speed but instead based on...

The entire system is a fucking joke. I get what you’re saying but the fact we don’t group classes based on speed but instead based on age, and the lowest class we haven’t been kicked out of yet is insane.


There’s front of pack c class guys going the same speed as back of pack a class. What in the actual fuck are we doing here.


The slowest in a should be faster than the fastest in c, period. Anything else is a fucking joke for all the people who want to race with people their speed.


I watch class after class have like 5-15 people in it and maybe 3 of the people are of similar speed and get to have a good battle. rest are smoking them all or getting smoked, even so bad as lapping people in their same class in a. 4-5 lap race. That’s not racing. That’s a joke.


And then we wonder why nobody wants to race moto.


Motocross CAN be the greatest experience on earth. But how we’re currently doing it for amateurs is a total fucking shame.

Timo wrote:
If you win in c class the next year you should move to b, you win b you should move to a. Pretty easy but there's...

If you win in c class the next year you should move to b, you win b you should move to a. Pretty easy but there's nothing above a to move to so then johnny gets beat pretty bad and wants to move back down so he can be a winner again. 

I made my kid start in peewee A because he'd learn faster if the kids he was racing were better than him. He got beat pretty badly for most of the season, but came out and won the last race we did, by a significant margin. I guarantee he's better now than if I had let him rip peewee C and win every race. He was upset and a little beat down after the first couple races, but I used it as a learning experience because life doesn't always work out the way you want. We don't cry about it or throw a fit, just put your head down and try to enjoy the ride. Hopefully when he's grown he'll be a better man than me. 

Lolz, peewee A, can you link me the results where there is a peewee A, B and C class? Wild the promoter is making bank in that area…

1
2
JB 19
Posts
4329
Joined
3/8/2009
Location
Marion, OH US
2/1/2026 3:27pm
JB 19 wrote:
I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how...

I think some of the guys in this thread like to make fun of the sand bagging,  but they are completely out of touch with how far the level has progressed at the national level.  You literally have kids who can't make the top 40 at a regional qualifier where only 6 advance who win at the local level.    They're so much faster than the local C kids  that it isn't really fair so they get called sand baggers, yet they don't make the top 40 at a national race.   Let them race B at local races so the real C riders can have a chance.   

30minmotos wrote:
The entire system is a fucking joke. I get what you’re saying but the fact we don’t group classes based on speed but instead based on...

The entire system is a fucking joke. I get what you’re saying but the fact we don’t group classes based on speed but instead based on age, and the lowest class we haven’t been kicked out of yet is insane.


There’s front of pack c class guys going the same speed as back of pack a class. What in the actual fuck are we doing here.


The slowest in a should be faster than the fastest in c, period. Anything else is a fucking joke for all the people who want to race with people their speed.


I watch class after class have like 5-15 people in it and maybe 3 of the people are of similar speed and get to have a good battle. rest are smoking them all or getting smoked, even so bad as lapping people in their same class in a. 4-5 lap race. That’s not racing. That’s a joke.


And then we wonder why nobody wants to race moto.


Motocross CAN be the greatest experience on earth. But how we’re currently doing it for amateurs is a total fucking shame.

Tell me you don't go to national races without telling me.   It's obvious you aren't understanding what I'm saying.   The only place that a front runner in the C class runs with the guys in the A class is at chicken licks.    It isn't happening at the national races.   Not even close.   

2
4

Post a reply to: Another reason local racing has low numbers

The Latest