Honda CRF Chassis harshness

MxAddic
Posts
5308
Joined
11/24/2022
Location
NY US
1/13/2025 7:05am
lowmass wrote:
Im not completely sure about the yamaha yet. This spring will continue set up changes to see but  So far it has been as I say...

Im not completely sure about the yamaha yet. This spring will continue set up changes to see but  So far it has been as I say, a great work in the suspension and chassis comfort dept. And a great motor, BUT, for whatever reason it feels much less responsive to rider input than the honda and its  just not the flickable fun bounce house style geometry that I personally seem to gel better with

The green bike vibed a lot but was similar to Yamaha in chassis comfort.The vibes were deal breaker for me

The ktm was a test bed for me.That season I had time to do about 2 revalves a week.  I learned a lot about valving and chassis setup on that bike. This is a 2022sxf450. 

The honda has a harshness in the rear, not the front. It  seems so far to be mostly in the chassis, not the suspension. I do not want this to be so. I would absolutely love for someone to show this is wrong and heres the fix. 

 

I will say in the last 6 months a good many Honda factory guys had the rear step out on them. Not saying there is a connection but it happened a bunch.

4
CarlinoJoeVideo
Posts
7519
Joined
11/30/2013
Location
Portland/Los Angeles, CA US
1/13/2025 7:22am

I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info on goggle but maybe you can reach out to him.

Did you try reducing torque on the swingarm nut?

I’d try from FCP mounts or reducing torque on stock mounts to see if you feel a change.


You can also loosen all the engine bolts including swingarm and rest all the torque spec, maybe things are bound up and just need to be reset

 

2
4
lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/13/2025 7:47am Edited Date/Time 1/13/2025 7:55am
I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info...

I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info on goggle but maybe you can reach out to him.

Did you try reducing torque on the swingarm nut?

I’d try from FCP mounts or reducing torque on stock mounts to see if you feel a change.


You can also loosen all the engine bolts including swingarm and rest all the torque spec, maybe things are bound up and just need to be reset

 

Thanks

Yes I have been after Keefer about this for a few months now. He agrees. He says they came to same conclusion a while back. He may not understand exactly whats happening and some designers  get upset at his use of terms (sorry Kriss but word meaning matters ha) to describe things but his experience mirrors mine.

I did hear the podcast you talk about where they basically just break the square edge of the shock mounts structure with a file. I do understand at times a small change can make a useful difference BUT in FEA analysis just breaking that edge shows zero change in overall stiffness. Im struggling to believe that one but willing to try it as I see no possability of failure, just doubt it will do anything. The new shock tower is a seriously rigid and beefy  structure. The older honda shock towers (2007) were long structures with quite a bit more flex than the new design so who knows

I have tryed changing torques on various parts including engine mounts and swing pivot but so far no significant effect, I will at some point goto extreems on torque and ride over mild terrane to see if can isolate the issue. Taking torques to low values that mean connection failure can help here but be carful ha.

As for FCP I have talked to them as well. My plan is the hack up and mod the stock mounts from stiffer to flexyer to see the difference before I shell out that much $ for mounts. Stock mounts are cheap.  I actually have a design on paper for adjustable stiffness mounts that I may make  crude protos of for test but first just loosen etc to see what happens

4
2
CarlinoJoeVideo
Posts
7519
Joined
11/30/2013
Location
Portland/Los Angeles, CA US
1/13/2025 8:40am
I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info...

I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info on goggle but maybe you can reach out to him.

Did you try reducing torque on the swingarm nut?

I’d try from FCP mounts or reducing torque on stock mounts to see if you feel a change.


You can also loosen all the engine bolts including swingarm and rest all the torque spec, maybe things are bound up and just need to be reset

 

lowmass wrote:
ThanksYes I have been after Keefer about this for a few months now. He agrees. He says they came to same conclusion a while back. He...

Thanks

Yes I have been after Keefer about this for a few months now. He agrees. He says they came to same conclusion a while back. He may not understand exactly whats happening and some designers  get upset at his use of terms (sorry Kriss but word meaning matters ha) to describe things but his experience mirrors mine.

I did hear the podcast you talk about where they basically just break the square edge of the shock mounts structure with a file. I do understand at times a small change can make a useful difference BUT in FEA analysis just breaking that edge shows zero change in overall stiffness. Im struggling to believe that one but willing to try it as I see no possability of failure, just doubt it will do anything. The new shock tower is a seriously rigid and beefy  structure. The older honda shock towers (2007) were long structures with quite a bit more flex than the new design so who knows

I have tryed changing torques on various parts including engine mounts and swing pivot but so far no significant effect, I will at some point goto extreems on torque and ride over mild terrane to see if can isolate the issue. Taking torques to low values that mean connection failure can help here but be carful ha.

As for FCP I have talked to them as well. My plan is the hack up and mod the stock mounts from stiffer to flexyer to see the difference before I shell out that much $ for mounts. Stock mounts are cheap.  I actually have a design on paper for adjustable stiffness mounts that I may make  crude protos of for test but first just loosen etc to see what happens

Nice, the adjustable stiffness mounts would be fun try! Be careful modifying the stock mounts, I think they are cast and will get brittle once they are drilled and can crack.  Not a big deal if they do, just have extra on hand.


I agree on filing the shock tower but placebo effect is real also. 


You might want to reach out to Colton Udall on IG, I’ve seen him do lots of mods to the CRF X to get them ready for racing at Baja 1000.  He was chasing the old Honda chassis feel as well.

1

The Shop

lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/13/2025 8:58am
I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info...

I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info on goggle but maybe you can reach out to him.

Did you try reducing torque on the swingarm nut?

I’d try from FCP mounts or reducing torque on stock mounts to see if you feel a change.


You can also loosen all the engine bolts including swingarm and rest all the torque spec, maybe things are bound up and just need to be reset

 

lowmass wrote:
ThanksYes I have been after Keefer about this for a few months now. He agrees. He says they came to same conclusion a while back. He...

Thanks

Yes I have been after Keefer about this for a few months now. He agrees. He says they came to same conclusion a while back. He may not understand exactly whats happening and some designers  get upset at his use of terms (sorry Kriss but word meaning matters ha) to describe things but his experience mirrors mine.

I did hear the podcast you talk about where they basically just break the square edge of the shock mounts structure with a file. I do understand at times a small change can make a useful difference BUT in FEA analysis just breaking that edge shows zero change in overall stiffness. Im struggling to believe that one but willing to try it as I see no possability of failure, just doubt it will do anything. The new shock tower is a seriously rigid and beefy  structure. The older honda shock towers (2007) were long structures with quite a bit more flex than the new design so who knows

I have tryed changing torques on various parts including engine mounts and swing pivot but so far no significant effect, I will at some point goto extreems on torque and ride over mild terrane to see if can isolate the issue. Taking torques to low values that mean connection failure can help here but be carful ha.

As for FCP I have talked to them as well. My plan is the hack up and mod the stock mounts from stiffer to flexyer to see the difference before I shell out that much $ for mounts. Stock mounts are cheap.  I actually have a design on paper for adjustable stiffness mounts that I may make  crude protos of for test but first just loosen etc to see what happens

Nice, the adjustable stiffness mounts would be fun try! Be careful modifying the stock mounts, I think they are cast and will get brittle once they...

Nice, the adjustable stiffness mounts would be fun try! Be careful modifying the stock mounts, I think they are cast and will get brittle once they are drilled and can crack.  Not a big deal if they do, just have extra on hand.


I agree on filing the shock tower but placebo effect is real also. 


You might want to reach out to Colton Udall on IG, I’ve seen him do lots of mods to the CRF X to get them ready for racing at Baja 1000.  He was chasing the old Honda chassis feel as well.

placebo can be a bugga for shur

stock mounts are steel on the crf

might be cast on the crx? they are sure more expensinve on the crx than the crf

thanks for tip, whats "IG"?

 

mike44
Posts
120
Joined
8/20/2022
Location
FR
1/13/2025 9:25am

It may be simplistic what I'm about to say, but isn't the fact that the Honda is very precise, turns extremely well, and is very flickable a corollary of this perceived 'rigidity,' given that other brands are more comfortable but don't have these qualities? Apart from the vibrations, what did you think of the Kawasaki's agility compared to the Yamaha?

wrc777
Posts
3117
Joined
5/21/2020
Location
Greenwood, IN US
Fantasy
1/13/2025 9:37am
AssangeMX wrote:
So the yam is not up to scratch,  the ktm needed 20 revalves and still wasn't right, green was a no go straight off the bat....And...

So the yam is not up to scratch,  the ktm needed 20 revalves and still wasn't right, green was a no go straight off the bat....

And the Honda is too harsh?

Did I miss anything?

lowmass wrote:
Im not completely sure about the yamaha yet. This spring will continue set up changes to see but  So far it has been as I say...

Im not completely sure about the yamaha yet. This spring will continue set up changes to see but  So far it has been as I say, a great work in the suspension and chassis comfort dept. And a great motor, BUT, for whatever reason it feels much less responsive to rider input than the honda and its  just not the flickable fun bounce house style geometry that I personally seem to gel better with

The green bike vibed a lot but was similar to Yamaha in chassis comfort.The vibes were deal breaker for me

The ktm was a test bed for me.That season I had time to do about 2 revalves a week.  I learned a lot about valving and chassis setup on that bike. This is a 2022sxf450. 

The honda has a harshness in the rear, not the front. It  seems so far to be mostly in the chassis, not the suspension. I do not want this to be so. I would absolutely love for someone to show this is wrong and heres the fix. 

 

I don't think you are going to get very far with the engine mounts. That will affect harshness in the front of the bike more than the rear. You probably need to chase the shock tower and linkage. KTM went after both on the 2025 frame, and it helped harshness on both ends of the bike.

1
1/13/2025 10:01am
Tested about every Honda since the 250R came out. what i have found is:1st gen 250 2004-2009 Crf 250 Frame: flex is perfect for consumer not...

Tested about every Honda since the 250R came out. what i have found is:

1st gen 250 2004-2009 Crf 250 Frame: flex is perfect for consumer not riding supercross.

2nd gen 450 2005-2008 Crf 450 Frame: flex is perfect for consumer not riding supercross

 

2nd gen 250 2010-2013 crf Crf250 Frame: flex is okay, frame is stiffer but can be cleaned up with linkage. Fork adjustment in clamps. clamps not needed just yet.

3rd gen 450 2009-2012 crf 450 frame: flex is not great. frame is stiffer but can be settled with Clamps, Linkage. Clamps needed.

 

3rd gen  crf250 2014-2017 Frame: Stiff. not much flex. front end needs clamps, rear end needs linkage, suspension NEEDS work. Clutch was not durable at all. Bike gained weight, motor needs modded to push the weight around.

4th gen Crf450 2013-2016 Frame: flex was okay actually, needed linkage needed suspension work. but after was decent.

 

4th gen Crf250 2018-2021 frame: Unsure, Engine was a trash factory, looked like something out of their lawn mower department.

5th gen crf450 2017-2020 Frame: unsure personally, but a friend of mine Daniel baker #431 had one and complained about rear end a little. so im assuming linkage. i also think he had tried some x trigs on it. not sure which offset. he never complained frame was too stiff.

 

5th gen crf250 2022-2024/25 frame: unsure

6th gen Crf450 2021-2023/24/25

Instant Hate mail received on this frame from multiple testers. I personally havent rode one. but i saw 4 pretty quick guys in my area buy one and instantly sell and move to a different brand bike. multiple complaints about too stiff intial hits, palms hurting, "bike was stinkbugged" one guy said, another said "feels like the front end is a springboard and the rear just is there" 

 

one would probably assume the newer the year, the stiffer the frame. The more spending/testing you will need to do to get it dialed, and within that phrase "dialed" would include Triple clamps, suspension, linkage, chain guide, slider, Bearing races is a possible. Without that probably kiss getting the stock bike to handle well goodbye. sorry for the long post.

 

"The more spending/testing you will need to do to get it dialed, and within that phrase "dialed" would include Triple clamps, suspension, linkage, chain guide, slider, Bearing races is a possible. Without that probably kiss getting the stock bike to handle well goodbye. sorry for the long post."

I have a 2023 crf450..chasing the harshness...what does Chain guide and sliders have to do with it? Any info on this an i'm all ears..

 

 Thanks

Luxon MX
Posts
1372
Joined
11/6/2017
Location
San Diego, CA US
Fantasy
1/13/2025 10:30am
I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info...

I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info on goggle but maybe you can reach out to him.

Did you try reducing torque on the swingarm nut?

I’d try from FCP mounts or reducing torque on stock mounts to see if you feel a change.


You can also loosen all the engine bolts including swingarm and rest all the torque spec, maybe things are bound up and just need to be reset

 

lowmass wrote:
ThanksYes I have been after Keefer about this for a few months now. He agrees. He says they came to same conclusion a while back. He...

Thanks

Yes I have been after Keefer about this for a few months now. He agrees. He says they came to same conclusion a while back. He may not understand exactly whats happening and some designers  get upset at his use of terms (sorry Kriss but word meaning matters ha) to describe things but his experience mirrors mine.

I did hear the podcast you talk about where they basically just break the square edge of the shock mounts structure with a file. I do understand at times a small change can make a useful difference BUT in FEA analysis just breaking that edge shows zero change in overall stiffness. Im struggling to believe that one but willing to try it as I see no possability of failure, just doubt it will do anything. The new shock tower is a seriously rigid and beefy  structure. The older honda shock towers (2007) were long structures with quite a bit more flex than the new design so who knows

I have tryed changing torques on various parts including engine mounts and swing pivot but so far no significant effect, I will at some point goto extreems on torque and ride over mild terrane to see if can isolate the issue. Taking torques to low values that mean connection failure can help here but be carful ha.

As for FCP I have talked to them as well. My plan is the hack up and mod the stock mounts from stiffer to flexyer to see the difference before I shell out that much $ for mounts. Stock mounts are cheap.  I actually have a design on paper for adjustable stiffness mounts that I may make  crude protos of for test but first just loosen etc to see what happens

Suspension should be your number one change. That will make by far the most difference of anything mentioned in this thread. 

Reducing bolt torque - does nothing. Unless you go too low, then you significantly increase the rate of fatigue on the bolt and/or you get slipping of the joint, which is a bad thing. All your bolts should be properly torqued such that everything is connected as it's supposed to be. A loose engine mount bolt can cause a lot of vibration.

Chamfering edges of the frame - Simply breaking the sharp edges won't do anything. It won't hurt, but it's largely a waste of time. 

Engine Mounts - Won't do much. You'll have to be REALLY sensitive to feel a change, and it won't at all be the massive change needed for you based on what you're after.

Split triple clamp - Will make things better, but won't be the magic answer to fix everything. 

Bars - Can help if you're not running something good already. Twinwalls are the worst, Evo or similar are good. 

Linkage - Won't do anything unless you're changing the actual linkage ratio. File this under suspension changes rather than structural changes.

Everything else - Wheels, tires, tire pressure, tubes, etc. can all change how things feel. You might try switching to a different brand of tire.

Stiffness may not be your main issue, it might be damping; not a whole lot you can do about that, though. It's not like you can change the location of the gas tank or how the subframe mounts up... You can try (carefully) filling the frame rails with foam to help dampen out vibrations. 

6
2
AssangeMX
Posts
466
Joined
3/12/2024
Location
Belmarsh, CA US
1/13/2025 11:40am

Have you tried standing up more?

lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/13/2025 11:49am Edited Date/Time 1/13/2025 12:12pm
mike44 wrote:
It may be simplistic what I'm about to say, but isn't the fact that the Honda is very precise, turns extremely well, and is very flickable...

It may be simplistic what I'm about to say, but isn't the fact that the Honda is very precise, turns extremely well, and is very flickable a corollary of this perceived 'rigidity,' given that other brands are more comfortable but don't have these qualities? Apart from the vibrations, what did you think of the Kawasaki's agility compared to the Yamaha?

Hmm not sure. I suspect the "quicker" geometry of the honda is not really the reason for what I feel. It is a definite harshness in the rear only that you wont notice on soft tracks. 

The Kaw turned better and is more agile than the Yamaha IMO but the Kow motor was anemic, especially when comparing to the yamaha. I suspect however the Kow may be a better bike for many. The yamaha is a handfull at times

1
1
lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/13/2025 11:54am Edited Date/Time 1/13/2025 8:16pm
AssangeMX wrote:
So the yam is not up to scratch,  the ktm needed 20 revalves and still wasn't right, green was a no go straight off the bat....And...

So the yam is not up to scratch,  the ktm needed 20 revalves and still wasn't right, green was a no go straight off the bat....

And the Honda is too harsh?

Did I miss anything?

lowmass wrote:
Im not completely sure about the yamaha yet. This spring will continue set up changes to see but  So far it has been as I say...

Im not completely sure about the yamaha yet. This spring will continue set up changes to see but  So far it has been as I say, a great work in the suspension and chassis comfort dept. And a great motor, BUT, for whatever reason it feels much less responsive to rider input than the honda and its  just not the flickable fun bounce house style geometry that I personally seem to gel better with

The green bike vibed a lot but was similar to Yamaha in chassis comfort.The vibes were deal breaker for me

The ktm was a test bed for me.That season I had time to do about 2 revalves a week.  I learned a lot about valving and chassis setup on that bike. This is a 2022sxf450. 

The honda has a harshness in the rear, not the front. It  seems so far to be mostly in the chassis, not the suspension. I do not want this to be so. I would absolutely love for someone to show this is wrong and heres the fix. 

 

wrc777 wrote:
I don't think you are going to get very far with the engine mounts. That will affect harshness in the front of the bike more than...

I don't think you are going to get very far with the engine mounts. That will affect harshness in the front of the bike more than the rear. You probably need to chase the shock tower and linkage. KTM went after both on the 2025 frame, and it helped harshness on both ends of the bike.

I had a 2025 sxf350 for about a month, sold it because I didnt like the motor BUT yes compared to the harshness I feel in the 2022SXF they did overcome it somewhat in the 2025

Tested LUXONs knuckle for the 2025 sxf and would recommend it for most people in most conditions.

2
1/13/2025 12:07pm
"The more spending/testing you will need to do to get it dialed, and within that phrase "dialed" would include Triple clamps, suspension, linkage, chain guide, slider...

"The more spending/testing you will need to do to get it dialed, and within that phrase "dialed" would include Triple clamps, suspension, linkage, chain guide, slider, Bearing races is a possible. Without that probably kiss getting the stock bike to handle well goodbye. sorry for the long post."

I have a 2023 crf450..chasing the harshness...what does Chain guide and sliders have to do with it? Any info on this an i'm all ears..

 

 Thanks

Cause they wear out and they are weak.

lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/13/2025 12:10pm
I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info...

I remember something Keefer was talking about years ago about debuting some edges of the Honda shock tower to reduce rigidity. I can’t find any info on goggle but maybe you can reach out to him.

Did you try reducing torque on the swingarm nut?

I’d try from FCP mounts or reducing torque on stock mounts to see if you feel a change.


You can also loosen all the engine bolts including swingarm and rest all the torque spec, maybe things are bound up and just need to be reset

 

lowmass wrote:
ThanksYes I have been after Keefer about this for a few months now. He agrees. He says they came to same conclusion a while back. He...

Thanks

Yes I have been after Keefer about this for a few months now. He agrees. He says they came to same conclusion a while back. He may not understand exactly whats happening and some designers  get upset at his use of terms (sorry Kriss but word meaning matters ha) to describe things but his experience mirrors mine.

I did hear the podcast you talk about where they basically just break the square edge of the shock mounts structure with a file. I do understand at times a small change can make a useful difference BUT in FEA analysis just breaking that edge shows zero change in overall stiffness. Im struggling to believe that one but willing to try it as I see no possability of failure, just doubt it will do anything. The new shock tower is a seriously rigid and beefy  structure. The older honda shock towers (2007) were long structures with quite a bit more flex than the new design so who knows

I have tryed changing torques on various parts including engine mounts and swing pivot but so far no significant effect, I will at some point goto extreems on torque and ride over mild terrane to see if can isolate the issue. Taking torques to low values that mean connection failure can help here but be carful ha.

As for FCP I have talked to them as well. My plan is the hack up and mod the stock mounts from stiffer to flexyer to see the difference before I shell out that much $ for mounts. Stock mounts are cheap.  I actually have a design on paper for adjustable stiffness mounts that I may make  crude protos of for test but first just loosen etc to see what happens

Luxon MX wrote:
Suspension should be your number one change. That will make by far the most difference of anything mentioned in this thread. Reducing bolt torque - does nothing...

Suspension should be your number one change. That will make by far the most difference of anything mentioned in this thread. 

Reducing bolt torque - does nothing. Unless you go too low, then you significantly increase the rate of fatigue on the bolt and/or you get slipping of the joint, which is a bad thing. All your bolts should be properly torqued such that everything is connected as it's supposed to be. A loose engine mount bolt can cause a lot of vibration.

Chamfering edges of the frame - Simply breaking the sharp edges won't do anything. It won't hurt, but it's largely a waste of time. 

Engine Mounts - Won't do much. You'll have to be REALLY sensitive to feel a change, and it won't at all be the massive change needed for you based on what you're after.

Split triple clamp - Will make things better, but won't be the magic answer to fix everything. 

Bars - Can help if you're not running something good already. Twinwalls are the worst, Evo or similar are good. 

Linkage - Won't do anything unless you're changing the actual linkage ratio. File this under suspension changes rather than structural changes.

Everything else - Wheels, tires, tire pressure, tubes, etc. can all change how things feel. You might try switching to a different brand of tire.

Stiffness may not be your main issue, it might be damping; not a whole lot you can do about that, though. It's not like you can change the location of the gas tank or how the subframe mounts up... You can try (carefully) filling the frame rails with foam to help dampen out vibrations. 

Thanks Billy

So far this is what I have found as well. Suspension changes  (clicks ,sag, oil levels) have made the most change but still the issue is there. Surprisingly the biggest change has been running a higher rear (102sag) vs say 105-7 sag. BUT I like 105 sag and 2mm fork ht best for handling on this one. however I am working the stock stuff still. Havent tryed a different tire yet BUT did go to extremes with pressures as a test and the issue remains.

The issue seems to be solidly in the rear end. 

 

1
spacecat
Posts
97
Joined
5/22/2011
Location
Spencer, OH US
1/13/2025 12:23pm

I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag is 113mm with a fork height of 2.5 -5mm. Seems a bit extreme but I'll give it a try. 165lbs intermediate rider. 

1
lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/13/2025 3:19pm
spacecat wrote:
I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag...

I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag is 113mm with a fork height of 2.5 -5mm. Seems a bit extreme but I'll give it a try. 165lbs intermediate rider. 

113mm?

On the new honda or some other bike?

I was talking to them the other day and they said they liked 105mm on the honda

501Ross
Posts
173
Joined
2/12/2022
Location
Sherwood, AR US
1/13/2025 3:27pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2025 3:57pm
spacecat wrote:
I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag...

I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag is 113mm with a fork height of 2.5 -5mm. Seems a bit extreme but I'll give it a try. 165lbs intermediate rider. 

They told me to start at 107 and increase until i noticed a difference of turn in

Edit: Fork Height of 2.5. 

1
soggy
Posts
8445
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
UT US
1/13/2025 3:35pm
spacecat wrote:
I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag...

I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag is 113mm with a fork height of 2.5 -5mm. Seems a bit extreme but I'll give it a try. 165lbs intermediate rider. 

501Ross wrote:

They told me to start at 107 and increase until i noticed a difference of turn in

Edit: Fork Height of 2.5. 

you might get different settings depending who and what shop you are talking too.

1
1
spacecat
Posts
97
Joined
5/22/2011
Location
Spencer, OH US
1/13/2025 5:35pm
spacecat wrote:
I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag...

I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag is 113mm with a fork height of 2.5 -5mm. Seems a bit extreme but I'll give it a try. 165lbs intermediate rider. 

lowmass wrote:

113mm?

On the new honda or some other bike?

I was talking to them the other day and they said they liked 105mm on the honda

2025 crf450r

lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/13/2025 8:04pm Edited Date/Time 1/13/2025 8:06pm
spacecat wrote:
I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag...

I just got my suspension back from Factory connection for a revalve to address the harshness issue I felt on stock settings. Their recommendation for sag is 113mm with a fork height of 2.5 -5mm. Seems a bit extreme but I'll give it a try. 165lbs intermediate rider. 

lowmass wrote:

113mm?

On the new honda or some other bike?

I was talking to them the other day and they said they liked 105mm on the honda

spacecat wrote:

2025 crf450r

hmmm well  107 start is in the ballpark, I guess play and see. Ive been from 101 to 108. I found anything more than about 105 and the rear feels like its ridding on the bumper. Very harsh BUT thats on stock suspension

I  find this bike to responded  well to fork height changes. There was a suprising difference between 2 and 5 mm. 

Im VERY curious to hear if the FC suspension mods reduce the harshness to your satisfaction. Will you be riding the bike soon?

 

1
1
1/14/2025 2:22am
lowmass wrote:
No. I am a development engineer. Most of my work has been developing scientific equipment used in Synchrotron labs but also have a fair amount of...

No. I am a development engineer. Most of my work has been developing scientific equipment used in Synchrotron labs but also have a fair amount of work in loudspeaker development and hold a couple of patents on an aluminum ribbon style transducers . These are very fragile devices that if you do not control the unwanted wiggles well they self destruct. Much of my appreciation for how critical proper damping can be was forged here

 

Fascinating. Congratulations on the patents. 

1
Darrin Willis
Posts
1105
Joined
11/16/2020
Location
Red Deer County, AB CA
1/14/2025 5:54am

Im sorry everyone but I really get a kick out of imagining The Hurricane reading this thread. 

1
2
crowe660
Posts
2264
Joined
8/15/2020
Location
US
1/14/2025 6:37am

How fast are y’all?  

1
lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/14/2025 8:02am

Im sorry everyone but I really get a kick out of imagining The Hurricane reading this thread. 

what do ya think he would say?

lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/14/2025 8:02am
crowe660 wrote:

How fast are y’all?  

speed has nothing to do with this one

1
crc245
Posts
1325
Joined
10/29/2007
Location
Yorba Linda, CA US
1/14/2025 8:48am

lowmass - Still waiting for some basic information: Current hours on the bike, rider size/weight/ability, vet or main track riding, moto/off-road/sx!, changes from stock, etc. If on the bubble, weight-wise, the Honda usually prefers a stiffer shock spring and less preload over a heavily tensioned spring. If spring rates have already been updated, what brand? Even springs aren’t apples to apples…

Comparing the RWE and R is fruitless, by the way. 18mm shock shaft, coatings, setup are completely bike specific. You mentioned CRF450 in your original post, just verifying it’s an R and not RWE we’re talking about. 

1
Village Idiot
Posts
2384
Joined
5/19/2023
Location
MXoN - a term used by newbs, goobs and rubes, PW US
1/14/2025 9:14am

I'd be curious to see how an 18" rear affects this sensation.

3
lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/14/2025 12:47pm Edited Date/Time 1/14/2025 12:53pm
crc245 wrote:
lowmass - Still waiting for some basic information: Current hours on the bike, rider size/weight/ability, vet or main track riding, moto/off-road/sx!, changes from stock, etc. If...

lowmass - Still waiting for some basic information: Current hours on the bike, rider size/weight/ability, vet or main track riding, moto/off-road/sx!, changes from stock, etc. If on the bubble, weight-wise, the Honda usually prefers a stiffer shock spring and less preload over a heavily tensioned spring. If spring rates have already been updated, what brand? Even springs aren’t apples to apples…

Comparing the RWE and R is fruitless, by the way. 18mm shock shaft, coatings, setup are completely bike specific. You mentioned CRF450 in your original post, just verifying it’s an R and not RWE we’re talking about. 

crf450R  not the WE

all stock , 12 hrs on bike on quite rough tracks both sand and hardpack

fork at 2mm sag at 103 , Ive been from fork at 5mm and sags from 101-108. I find 105 best but 103 is a bit less harsh I have to run the stock forks rebound clicker at only 2-3 out from full hard ( comp clicker does next to nothing stock so using the crossover effect of the rebound circuit to get some comp damp) and added 50cc oil in outers to get a fork that had anywhere near enough hold up to ride the bike at speed. Believe it or not the fork , even in this config, isnt all that bad

Im 182lbs vet expert, I no longer huck the big triples ( can but usually dont) BUT can still give local fast guys a go.  however I dont ride there most of the time. Probably more a fast intermediate AND I dont ride like an old guy. Blessed with a youthful build and I ride light on the bike

Out of all the settings the sag has had the largest effect on the rear ends harshness. Blowing out comp and HS comps on shock can help BUT no control at speed with such a setting and even the stock settings blow through too easily in the deeper power on stuff anyway

Also perhaps important I dont use hands /arms as my strength to hang on. I never get arm pump 

and btw no matter what speed Im at I can feel the rear ends issue. Its not simply overloaded

 

1
lowmass
Posts
183
Joined
6/19/2024
Location
LANSING, NY US
1/14/2025 12:48pm

I'd be curious to see how an 18" rear affects this sensation.

me too. a bit more meat and damp

1
1

Post a reply to: Honda CRF Chassis harshness

The Latest