Let's try this again-Wordnerd on Alessi...

sergio
Posts
134
Joined
4/5/2010
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Edited Date/Time 1/27/2012 2:30pm
From Spinner -
Over at Racerhead. That was good stuff, Steve. Damn funny too!

Maybe a clean slate will keep this on topic.

It was a good read, Cox made some interesting points.
|
sergio
Posts
134
Joined
4/5/2010
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
5/28/2010 9:44pm
Okay, here’s Steve Cox with much more on Hangtown:
Mike Alessi is a great motocross racer, and he’s the best starter in the entire world, but what he has there is often offset (and then some) by the possibly thoughtless things he sometimes says or does. For example, the whole Ivan Tedesco incident at Glen Helen a bunch of years ago. No one knows exactly what he was thinking – maybe not even Alessi – but it happened regardless.
And the crazy thing is, after a year basically away from racing, Alessi still lets his emotions run rampant with no filter between his brain and his mouth. After an absolutely masterful performance in the second moto at Hangtown, where he got the holeshot and just left everyone behind on his sleek new KTM 350, Alessi rolled up to the podium and essentially moved people out of the way because they (understandably) weren’t expecting that. As he revved his bike on the podium, his competition was dumbfounded. His former teammate Chad Reed didn’t know what to make of it, and Alessi’s longtime rival Davi Millsaps just thought it was hilarious.
Then Alessi was informed that he didn’t win the overall. Chad Reed did. A 1-3 beats a 4-1 in any motocross series in existence. But that didn’t stop Alessi.
In the press conference, Alessi had the opportunity to be humble but, as usual, missed the mark. "After the second moto, I wasn’t even tired," he stated. "I mean, this is my helmet from the second moto, and it’s not even dirty." Later, he said that he didn’t even break a sweat. He went on to talk about how coming back from Europe to race at REM was the best thing he had done, because it exposed a lot of flaws in the bike. "We learned a lot on the motorcycle from being in Europe for a month and made the bike better, and then we came back to America and made the bike even better. I mean, honestly, the best thing that I did in the last month was racing the pre-races that I did at REM…. We learned a lot about the motorcycle: we had fuel-boiling, we had electronical [sic] problems, we had a shock blow out…. We had just different stuff. And it just shows that those races – those meaningless races that we did – proved that we had work to do, and for the last month we’ve been working hard to make the problem better. And it shows. The bike was frickin’ awesome today. It couldn’t have been any better…."
So if you’re buying a bike, would you want one that has all of those problems when it’s not a completely dialed-in factory bike? This is why most riders are tight-lipped about bike problems – because they’re being paid to sell bikes.
He went on, with a similar question, to end an answer with "We made some big improvements in the last couple of weeks and came here and just demolished them today." Of course, Alessi didn’t demolish them. He actually finished second.
Chad Reed was really funny when he got up, getting giggles from the entire audience when he immediately said, "I won, right? I won the overall? I was almost confused by listening to that…."

Two motos into a twenty-four-moto series, #800 has already managed to offend and anger most of his competition, including the guy who beat him last Saturday, Reed. And Reed is exactly the wrong kind of guy to give motivation to.
The amazing thing is that Mike made his professional debut at Millville in 2004 (compare that fiasco to what we saw from Eli Tomac). That was six years ago. But nothing has changed. That either means he’s incapable of changing or that he simply doesn’t recognize the need. But if fueling Chad Reed’s fire this summer doesn’t make him realize that he needs to change his way of thinking, nothing probably ever will.
Matthes
Posts
2755
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
5/29/2010 8:14pm
Alessi wasn't really pumped about this and spoke to Cox about it. I think they hashed it out.
rc4187
Posts
1086
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
5/29/2010 8:21pm Edited Date/Time 5/29/2010 9:57pm
Matthes wrote:
Alessi wasn't really pumped about this and spoke to Cox about it. I think they hashed it out.
Cox hit the nail on the head. He only stated what happened and how others reacted to it. Alessi can't really blame Cox for that. If MA doesn't want things like this written... Maybe he shouldn't do stupid things.
mxav8r
Posts
605
Joined
10/26/2006
Location
Atl, GA, USA
5/29/2010 8:26pm
Who gives a FUCK if Alessi wasn't " really pumped about this."....Are you guys reporters or PR publishers. God, this sport is so chicken shit when it comes to telling the truth/reporting. You all (most MX "journalist", not you Matthes) are so worried about getting the riders/managers/agents, etc... mad at you. It really is unbelievable how much of a popularity contest "journalistic" reporting has become ( With Swap/TWMX being the worst offender) in motocross.

The Shop

JB 19
Posts
4353
Joined
3/8/2009
Location
Marion, OH, USA
5/29/2010 8:30pm
I've NEVER been an Alessi fan....mostly due to his old man, but I don't see what he said that was so wrong. Maybe the bit about demolishing everyone, but whatever. The guy won a moto in his first AMA pro race since last summer on a bike that many doubted.....he deserves to be excited.
jaeckle
Posts
630
Joined
3/31/2010
Location
Hell, WI, USA
5/29/2010 8:37pm Edited Date/Time 5/29/2010 8:38pm
mxav8r wrote:
Who gives a FUCK if Alessi wasn't " really pumped about this."....Are you guys reporters or PR publishers. God, this sport is so chicken shit when...
Who gives a FUCK if Alessi wasn't " really pumped about this."....Are you guys reporters or PR publishers. God, this sport is so chicken shit when it comes to telling the truth/reporting. You all (most MX "journalist", not you Matthes) are so worried about getting the riders/managers/agents, etc... mad at you. It really is unbelievable how much of a popularity contest "journalistic" reporting has become ( With Swap/TWMX being the worst offender) in motocross.
Well said. There should be zero pay for the current crop of moto journalist and websites. Let's stop going to the magazine websites until they nut up. Let them pay through the ass to attract the mainstream crowd instead of us who actually ride and race. This "keep them dumb shit" has got to stop.
jaeckle
Posts
630
Joined
3/31/2010
Location
Hell, WI, USA
5/29/2010 8:40pm
Matthes has a gold mine. He just doesnt know it yet.
DrSweden
Posts
6761
Joined
8/30/2008
Location
Stockholm, SE
5/29/2010 8:44pm Edited Date/Time 5/29/2010 8:48pm
mxav8r wrote:
Who gives a FUCK if Alessi wasn't " really pumped about this."....Are you guys reporters or PR publishers. God, this sport is so chicken shit when...
Who gives a FUCK if Alessi wasn't " really pumped about this."....Are you guys reporters or PR publishers. God, this sport is so chicken shit when it comes to telling the truth/reporting. You all (most MX "journalist", not you Matthes) are so worried about getting the riders/managers/agents, etc... mad at you. It really is unbelievable how much of a popularity contest "journalistic" reporting has become ( With Swap/TWMX being the worst offender) in motocross.
2 that. Dunno, but he behaves like he has been living in a social shell for a decade. Kid needs some mental input or mentor with social skills.
plowboy
Posts
14839
Joined
1/3/2010
Location
Norwich, KS, USA
5/29/2010 8:51pm
I didn't read a word of un-truth in Nerds article. These same sentiments just keep getting repeated by different people in different forums. Sad to say, but I don't think Mikey is socially mature enough to speak in public. I believe Tony loves his kids to death but he did not impart any sense of appropriate situational behavior to the boys simply because he doesn't possess any to pass on. Mike and Jeff were raised at the track and that means they didn't come in contact with or learn from the other 99.9% of humans that don't know squat about moto. That's probably not a totally bad thing but Mike especially has zero social skills. Simply put he never had to know what acceptable and appropriate speech and behavior are. Everybody in his world is totally dedicated to HIM. Life is tough for all the racers who have spent their life chasing the dream...most don't have the added burden of father who doesn't know how to do the right thing. This is not a hater post...I've always liked the A's....even Tony is funny and cool..in small doses.
Matthes
Posts
2755
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
5/29/2010 8:54pm
mxav8r wrote:
Who gives a FUCK if Alessi wasn't " really pumped about this."....Are you guys reporters or PR publishers. God, this sport is so chicken shit when...
Who gives a FUCK if Alessi wasn't " really pumped about this."....Are you guys reporters or PR publishers. God, this sport is so chicken shit when it comes to telling the truth/reporting. You all (most MX "journalist", not you Matthes) are so worried about getting the riders/managers/agents, etc... mad at you. It really is unbelievable how much of a popularity contest "journalistic" reporting has become ( With Swap/TWMX being the worst offender) in motocross.
DrSweden wrote:
2 that. Dunno, but he behaves like he has been living in a social shell for a decade. Kid needs some mental input or mentor with...
2 that. Dunno, but he behaves like he has been living in a social shell for a decade. Kid needs some mental input or mentor with social skills.
You're right, there's a lot of sucking up out there (myself included when I have to) but you guys don't realize that there is no "Professional MX Writers Union" like in stick and ball sports to protect you and make you're credentialed at each and every race.

If you piss some dude off and he doesn't talk to you, you don't get the story or the interview or whatever. You do that enough times and soon, you're writing without getting any real info or scoops. Then there's a Vital thread about how so-and-so sucks balls cause their site/story or whatever has no real info.

So you have to play the game here and there. I text and talk to an incredible amount of riders during the week (we all do) and they give us info, answer questions and we pass it all on to you guys. You think Tiger or LeBron are answering texts and calls from nosy journalists? No. We're lucky we're still small enough that these guys do that.

Almost everyone tries to look at things with a critical eye but you have to do your best to remember that it's possible some rider won't talk to you or you'll be blackballed by a team or whatever.

Also, keep in mind that there aren't too many journos in the sport making a lot of money. Times are tight, I have a couple of other gigs as do some other guys to make ends meet and when you're mortgage depends on getting a story from a guy, maybe you play nice.
plowboy
Posts
14839
Joined
1/3/2010
Location
Norwich, KS, USA
5/29/2010 9:05pm
That's a tightrope walk for sure. The only way around your dilemna is to get so "big" that everyone in the sport is beatin' down yer door to get interviewed (ala Letterman/Leno). That was meant as a joke but it's still true I believe. Until then I guess you do what ya gotta do to put bologna on the table.
5/29/2010 9:08pm
Matthes wrote:
You're right, there's a lot of sucking up out there (myself included when I have to) but you guys don't realize that there is no "Professional...
You're right, there's a lot of sucking up out there (myself included when I have to) but you guys don't realize that there is no "Professional MX Writers Union" like in stick and ball sports to protect you and make you're credentialed at each and every race.

If you piss some dude off and he doesn't talk to you, you don't get the story or the interview or whatever. You do that enough times and soon, you're writing without getting any real info or scoops. Then there's a Vital thread about how so-and-so sucks balls cause their site/story or whatever has no real info.

So you have to play the game here and there. I text and talk to an incredible amount of riders during the week (we all do) and they give us info, answer questions and we pass it all on to you guys. You think Tiger or LeBron are answering texts and calls from nosy journalists? No. We're lucky we're still small enough that these guys do that.

Almost everyone tries to look at things with a critical eye but you have to do your best to remember that it's possible some rider won't talk to you or you'll be blackballed by a team or whatever.

Also, keep in mind that there aren't too many journos in the sport making a lot of money. Times are tight, I have a couple of other gigs as do some other guys to make ends meet and when you're mortgage depends on getting a story from a guy, maybe you play nice.
straight shootin homeboy...

p.s. nice crib
DrSweden
Posts
6761
Joined
8/30/2008
Location
Stockholm, SE
5/29/2010 9:18pm
Matthes wrote:
You're right, there's a lot of sucking up out there (myself included when I have to) but you guys don't realize that there is no "Professional...
You're right, there's a lot of sucking up out there (myself included when I have to) but you guys don't realize that there is no "Professional MX Writers Union" like in stick and ball sports to protect you and make you're credentialed at each and every race.

If you piss some dude off and he doesn't talk to you, you don't get the story or the interview or whatever. You do that enough times and soon, you're writing without getting any real info or scoops. Then there's a Vital thread about how so-and-so sucks balls cause their site/story or whatever has no real info.

So you have to play the game here and there. I text and talk to an incredible amount of riders during the week (we all do) and they give us info, answer questions and we pass it all on to you guys. You think Tiger or LeBron are answering texts and calls from nosy journalists? No. We're lucky we're still small enough that these guys do that.

Almost everyone tries to look at things with a critical eye but you have to do your best to remember that it's possible some rider won't talk to you or you'll be blackballed by a team or whatever.

Also, keep in mind that there aren't too many journos in the sport making a lot of money. Times are tight, I have a couple of other gigs as do some other guys to make ends meet and when you're mortgage depends on getting a story from a guy, maybe you play nice.
I would newer do a better job than you, or the other guys doing this, nor would I survive, because I would probably burn all bridges in a week and as a consequence I would be butthurt because being left out in the cold. I know it's almost an impossible task, but I think despite us not being able to walk your shoes we have to be critical towards this syndrome because it's wrong to support it? So I understand it, but I don't want stand behind it? Fair?

I know you have been left in the cold a couple of times, but it seems you survived, maybe you survived just because of that?

Just saying of course...
Matthes
Posts
2755
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
5/29/2010 9:25pm
DrSweden wrote:
I would newer do a better job than you, or the other guys doing this, nor would I survive, because I would probably burn all bridges...
I would newer do a better job than you, or the other guys doing this, nor would I survive, because I would probably burn all bridges in a week and as a consequence I would be butthurt because being left out in the cold. I know it's almost an impossible task, but I think despite us not being able to walk your shoes we have to be critical towards this syndrome because it's wrong to support it? So I understand it, but I don't want stand behind it? Fair?

I know you have been left in the cold a couple of times, but it seems you survived, maybe you survived just because of that?

Just saying of course...
Yeah I mean there are definitely dudes that don't like me very much (Hanny, Millsaps, Grant, J-Law) but I'm ok with that. I think some of my being able to "survive" being critical of some people is because for 12 years I was a mechanic, I was there on the test days, in the shop, bullshitting with the riders, at the bar with them, etc, etc and maybe there's a bit of "he knows what hes talking about" syndrome.

And I mean, just a bit...
*
Posts
694
Joined
4/18/2010
Location
TK
5/30/2010 12:07am
sergio wrote:
From Spinner - Over at Racerhead. That was good stuff, Steve. Damn funny too! Maybe a clean slate will keep this on topic. It was a...
From Spinner -
Over at Racerhead. That was good stuff, Steve. Damn funny too!

Maybe a clean slate will keep this on topic.

It was a good read, Cox made some interesting points.
It's annoying when people say they had a good read somewhere and then do not post a link for it.

5/30/2010 12:37am
plowboy wrote:
I didn't read a word of un-truth in Nerds article. These same sentiments just keep getting repeated by different people in different forums. Sad to say...
I didn't read a word of un-truth in Nerds article. These same sentiments just keep getting repeated by different people in different forums. Sad to say, but I don't think Mikey is socially mature enough to speak in public. I believe Tony loves his kids to death but he did not impart any sense of appropriate situational behavior to the boys simply because he doesn't possess any to pass on. Mike and Jeff were raised at the track and that means they didn't come in contact with or learn from the other 99.9% of humans that don't know squat about moto. That's probably not a totally bad thing but Mike especially has zero social skills. Simply put he never had to know what acceptable and appropriate speech and behavior are. Everybody in his world is totally dedicated to HIM. Life is tough for all the racers who have spent their life chasing the dream...most don't have the added burden of father who doesn't know how to do the right thing. This is not a hater post...I've always liked the A's....even Tony is funny and cool..in small doses.
This quote should preface every Alessi drama thread...
DrSweden
Posts
6761
Joined
8/30/2008
Location
Stockholm, SE
6/1/2010 10:13am
Matthes wrote:
Yeah I mean there are definitely dudes that don't like me very much (Hanny, Millsaps, Grant, J-Law) but I'm ok with that. I think some of...
Yeah I mean there are definitely dudes that don't like me very much (Hanny, Millsaps, Grant, J-Law) but I'm ok with that. I think some of my being able to "survive" being critical of some people is because for 12 years I was a mechanic, I was there on the test days, in the shop, bullshitting with the riders, at the bar with them, etc, etc and maybe there's a bit of "he knows what hes talking about" syndrome.

And I mean, just a bit...
I'm glad you're ok with not being "liked" because of the obvious consequences. I bit pathetic though that these riders can't take it and continue this childish stubbornness.

Critique makes us improve mentally. Their loss really...
Hank_Thrill
Posts
4664
Joined
9/22/2008
Location
Arlen, TX, USA
6/1/2010 10:28am Edited Date/Time 6/1/2010 10:33am
I'd consider myself an Alessi fan, but as someone in the mental health profession, Mike might quite possibly be the dumbest fastest guy on the track. This write up was a perfect example of how his emotions, and idiocy get the best of him. This sort of behavior probably has more to do with his development from his father than anything else, but the guy has emotional hi-jackings all the time.

His emotions dictate his behavior, in contrast to someone like Christophe Pourcel who uses the muscle between his ears, keeps his cool, methodically thinks things out, and strikes like a shark!

I'm totally convinced intelligence has a lot to do with how fast someone can go on a bike. Riders coming up with unique creative lines is an example of intelligence, but judging by Mike's behaviors, I honestly think he might have one of the lowest I.Q.'s on the track. Just as some people can judge I.Q. by a persons writing or behavior, I'm pretty confident I can get a decent idea how smart someone is by their riding and podium speeches, and it wouldn't surprise me if Mike had an I.Q. somewhere around 90. He's obviously extremely fast, just not smart. I think the biggest threat to Mike's chance at a title this year isn't other competitors, but his mind. I'm not trying to be rude, just realistic. Just as Mike has worked on his bike to become faster, I hope he can work on himself in the same ways, to improve his performance.

I'd say the contact with BT101, is another recent example. That could come back to bite him in the ass later. Look at how clean RC raced people. He also always gave tons of respect to lapers, and look at the respect RC received in return from his competitors. Mike really could benefit from learning a lot.
6/1/2010 11:05am
I agree Hank. And listening to BT speak is refreshing in comparison.

Let's see what Grandal has to say.
WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
USA
6/1/2010 11:15am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 11:16pm
I don't see where Alessi is doing anything different than he always does. He's gone out of his way to alienate riders and make enemies since his amateur days. It's stupid - he's a big, big target in the first turn for a lot of guys - and it could wind up costing him a title. If riders start going to the line and getting three gates inside Alessi and just saying, "I'm holding it WFO and when Alessi turns, he's history", then he's going down.

There's nothing smart about making guys want to beat you specifically. Everyone wants to win, but when guys go out there and don't really care where they finish as long as Alessi finishes on the ground, then he's being stupid. "Us against the world" is Tony's battle cry, but of course Tony doesn't have to do any of the fighting.
devonb
Posts
177
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
6/1/2010 11:31am
I'd consider myself an Alessi fan, but as someone in the mental health profession, Mike might quite possibly be the dumbest fastest guy on the track...
I'd consider myself an Alessi fan, but as someone in the mental health profession, Mike might quite possibly be the dumbest fastest guy on the track. This write up was a perfect example of how his emotions, and idiocy get the best of him. This sort of behavior probably has more to do with his development from his father than anything else, but the guy has emotional hi-jackings all the time.

His emotions dictate his behavior, in contrast to someone like Christophe Pourcel who uses the muscle between his ears, keeps his cool, methodically thinks things out, and strikes like a shark!

I'm totally convinced intelligence has a lot to do with how fast someone can go on a bike. Riders coming up with unique creative lines is an example of intelligence, but judging by Mike's behaviors, I honestly think he might have one of the lowest I.Q.'s on the track. Just as some people can judge I.Q. by a persons writing or behavior, I'm pretty confident I can get a decent idea how smart someone is by their riding and podium speeches, and it wouldn't surprise me if Mike had an I.Q. somewhere around 90. He's obviously extremely fast, just not smart. I think the biggest threat to Mike's chance at a title this year isn't other competitors, but his mind. I'm not trying to be rude, just realistic. Just as Mike has worked on his bike to become faster, I hope he can work on himself in the same ways, to improve his performance.

I'd say the contact with BT101, is another recent example. That could come back to bite him in the ass later. Look at how clean RC raced people. He also always gave tons of respect to lapers, and look at the respect RC received in return from his competitors. Mike really could benefit from learning a lot.
His emotions dictate his behavior, in contrast to someone like Christophe Pourcel who uses the muscle between his ears, keeps his cool, methodically thinks things out, and strikes like a shark!

"Everybody knows I was the Champ last year"

Enough said.
Hank_Thrill
Posts
4664
Joined
9/22/2008
Location
Arlen, TX, USA
6/1/2010 11:39am
I'd consider myself an Alessi fan, but as someone in the mental health profession, Mike might quite possibly be the dumbest fastest guy on the track...
I'd consider myself an Alessi fan, but as someone in the mental health profession, Mike might quite possibly be the dumbest fastest guy on the track. This write up was a perfect example of how his emotions, and idiocy get the best of him. This sort of behavior probably has more to do with his development from his father than anything else, but the guy has emotional hi-jackings all the time.

His emotions dictate his behavior, in contrast to someone like Christophe Pourcel who uses the muscle between his ears, keeps his cool, methodically thinks things out, and strikes like a shark!

I'm totally convinced intelligence has a lot to do with how fast someone can go on a bike. Riders coming up with unique creative lines is an example of intelligence, but judging by Mike's behaviors, I honestly think he might have one of the lowest I.Q.'s on the track. Just as some people can judge I.Q. by a persons writing or behavior, I'm pretty confident I can get a decent idea how smart someone is by their riding and podium speeches, and it wouldn't surprise me if Mike had an I.Q. somewhere around 90. He's obviously extremely fast, just not smart. I think the biggest threat to Mike's chance at a title this year isn't other competitors, but his mind. I'm not trying to be rude, just realistic. Just as Mike has worked on his bike to become faster, I hope he can work on himself in the same ways, to improve his performance.

I'd say the contact with BT101, is another recent example. That could come back to bite him in the ass later. Look at how clean RC raced people. He also always gave tons of respect to lapers, and look at the respect RC received in return from his competitors. Mike really could benefit from learning a lot.
devonb wrote:
[b]His emotions dictate his behavior, in contrast to someone like Christophe Pourcel who uses the muscle between his ears, keeps his cool, methodically thinks things out...
His emotions dictate his behavior, in contrast to someone like Christophe Pourcel who uses the muscle between his ears, keeps his cool, methodically thinks things out, and strikes like a shark!

"Everybody knows I was the Champ last year"

Enough said.
As Jeff Emig said, "Christophe Pourcel won the championship last year in his mind. Now this year it's his chance to win it in everybody else's."

If that's the "dumbest" thing you can dig up on the guy, try again. There's really nothing dumb or stupid about what Christophe is saying, from his perspective. From your perspective, and nearly everyone else, it may be dumb because Dungey was the one holding up the trophy. CP just believes had the bike not broke he would have won, and odds are, he's probably right - but that's racing.
Crash82
Posts
9022
Joined
9/16/2006
Location
MONTGOMERY, AL, USA
6/1/2010 11:43am
"No filter between his brain and his mouth." Same could be said for Nerd and a lot folks. At this point Mike isn't going to make any new friends anyway, it's a war and he's proven warrior, keep on kicking ass Mike and get up on the podium when you win a moto, overall or not, damn straight!..............................When did RC race people clean?
motomike137
Posts
8180
Joined
4/22/2010
Location
Fenton, MI, USA
6/1/2010 11:50am
Mikey is a wonderful example of home schooling at its finest.
Adam43
Posts
3318
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
WF
6/1/2010 12:14pm
I'd consider myself an Alessi fan, but as someone in the mental health profession, Mike might quite possibly be the dumbest fastest guy on the track...
I'd consider myself an Alessi fan, but as someone in the mental health profession, Mike might quite possibly be the dumbest fastest guy on the track. This write up was a perfect example of how his emotions, and idiocy get the best of him. This sort of behavior probably has more to do with his development from his father than anything else, but the guy has emotional hi-jackings all the time.

His emotions dictate his behavior, in contrast to someone like Christophe Pourcel who uses the muscle between his ears, keeps his cool, methodically thinks things out, and strikes like a shark!

I'm totally convinced intelligence has a lot to do with how fast someone can go on a bike. Riders coming up with unique creative lines is an example of intelligence, but judging by Mike's behaviors, I honestly think he might have one of the lowest I.Q.'s on the track. Just as some people can judge I.Q. by a persons writing or behavior, I'm pretty confident I can get a decent idea how smart someone is by their riding and podium speeches, and it wouldn't surprise me if Mike had an I.Q. somewhere around 90. He's obviously extremely fast, just not smart. I think the biggest threat to Mike's chance at a title this year isn't other competitors, but his mind. I'm not trying to be rude, just realistic. Just as Mike has worked on his bike to become faster, I hope he can work on himself in the same ways, to improve his performance.

I'd say the contact with BT101, is another recent example. That could come back to bite him in the ass later. Look at how clean RC raced people. He also always gave tons of respect to lapers, and look at the respect RC received in return from his competitors. Mike really could benefit from learning a lot.
Interesting take Hank, I don't think you can base an IQ on that though.

I think Mike's behavior is a reflection on the fact that he is a 22 year old man with essentially no education, minimal social skill, and that he is basically not even in control of his own life.

Since Mike isn't doing SX anymore, if I were Tony I would do a helpful thing for my son and send him to college over the winter. Would help the boy immensely.
Racer92
Posts
17965
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Central, TX, USA
6/1/2010 12:24pm
Cox was right. Dont shoot the messenger.
zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX, USA
6/1/2010 12:24pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 11:16pm
I'd consider myself an Alessi fan, but as someone in the mental health profession, Mike might quite possibly be the dumbest fastest guy on the track...
I'd consider myself an Alessi fan, but as someone in the mental health profession, Mike might quite possibly be the dumbest fastest guy on the track. This write up was a perfect example of how his emotions, and idiocy get the best of him. This sort of behavior probably has more to do with his development from his father than anything else, but the guy has emotional hi-jackings all the time.

His emotions dictate his behavior, in contrast to someone like Christophe Pourcel who uses the muscle between his ears, keeps his cool, methodically thinks things out, and strikes like a shark!

I'm totally convinced intelligence has a lot to do with how fast someone can go on a bike. Riders coming up with unique creative lines is an example of intelligence, but judging by Mike's behaviors, I honestly think he might have one of the lowest I.Q.'s on the track. Just as some people can judge I.Q. by a persons writing or behavior, I'm pretty confident I can get a decent idea how smart someone is by their riding and podium speeches, and it wouldn't surprise me if Mike had an I.Q. somewhere around 90. He's obviously extremely fast, just not smart. I think the biggest threat to Mike's chance at a title this year isn't other competitors, but his mind. I'm not trying to be rude, just realistic. Just as Mike has worked on his bike to become faster, I hope he can work on himself in the same ways, to improve his performance.

I'd say the contact with BT101, is another recent example. That could come back to bite him in the ass later. Look at how clean RC raced people. He also always gave tons of respect to lapers, and look at the respect RC received in return from his competitors. Mike really could benefit from learning a lot.
i find it interesting that RC was considered clean.



kjm33
Posts
31
Joined
6/18/2007
Location
Ny, NY, USA
6/1/2010 12:25pm
Mikey is a wonderful example of home schooling at its finest.
Isn't it spelt "Home Scooling"...thats how I learnt it when I wuz in the progrum.
Hank_Thrill
Posts
4664
Joined
9/22/2008
Location
Arlen, TX, USA
6/1/2010 1:52pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 11:16pm
sergio wrote:
From Spinner - Over at Racerhead. That was good stuff, Steve. Damn funny too! Maybe a clean slate will keep this on topic. It was a...
From Spinner -
Over at Racerhead. That was good stuff, Steve. Damn funny too!

Maybe a clean slate will keep this on topic.

It was a good read, Cox made some interesting points.
Okay, maybe clean wasn't the right adjective. How about, blatantly disrespectful? RC had no problem runing it in on guys, getting aggressive, and bumping bars, but you rarely ever saw the guy deliberately take another rider out, and do things like stand on top of their bike while they were trying to restart. RC gave his competitors respect, even the lappers, and the respect was reciprocated back to him. Hell, he even let MC pass him back after he accidentally put a dirty move on his biggest rival at the time.


Watch this, respectful clean racing. Even David Bailey comments on how nice they were racing each other (that's just one race tho).

Mike's move on BT is going to come back to bite him in the ass. Don't think for a second BT won't remember that when the roles are reversed and he has a chance to give MA800 some heat. Don't get me wrong, I'm a MA800 fan.





6/1/2010 2:19pm
i think your onto something here, Mike and Tony seem don't seem to realise that at times they need the respect from the other riders on the track, the recent interviews with Josh Grant, Chad, RV and BT all show that none of these riders respect Alessi, infact they seem to enjoy taking shots at him, this is bad for the Alessi's as you do not need to give these guys extra motivation to want to beat you.

Post a reply to: Let's try this again-Wordnerd on Alessi...

The Latest