Why is McGrath "The King" in the Current Era?

1/24/2024 8:02pm
DonM wrote:

Yeah....ok....Leisk was good but was a nat on on Wardy's ass in comparison...

When they raced supercross together in 1988, they were a similar speed, both were good riders who achieved a lot in their careers, and both were...

When they raced supercross together in 1988, they were a similar speed, both were good riders who achieved a lot in their careers, and both were called "the flying freckle"!

DonM wrote:

Stop....Are you seriously trying to compare Leisk's career with Wardy's?....seriously...Leisk was a badass, but wasn't even in the same league as Wardy...

Are you saying 2 riders who finish 1 place from each other aren't a similar speed?

image-20240125145947-2

13
DonM
Posts
8383
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
Fantasy
1/24/2024 8:09pm
When they raced supercross together in 1988, they were a similar speed, both were good riders who achieved a lot in their careers, and both were...

When they raced supercross together in 1988, they were a similar speed, both were good riders who achieved a lot in their careers, and both were called "the flying freckle"!

DonM wrote:

Stop....Are you seriously trying to compare Leisk's career with Wardy's?....seriously...Leisk was a badass, but wasn't even in the same league as Wardy...

Are you saying 2 riders who finish 1 place from each other aren't a similar speed?

Are you saying 2 riders who finish 1 place from each other aren't a similar speed?

image-20240125145947-2

Are you seriously using one year of Wardy's career as a comparison? Leisk was a bad ass and had a great career but in comparison to Wardy's he wasn't even close...

4
3
-MAVERICK-
Posts
65515
Joined
3/26/2015
Location
Ontario CA
1/24/2024 8:23pm
Regis wrote:
Elvis is still the King.   MC will forever be the King. There will never be a replacement, even the GOAT had to earn his own...

Elvis is still the King.

 

MC will forever be the King. There will never be a replacement, even the GOAT had to earn his own rightful nickname.

I've got some bad news for you, Elvis is dead, sorry for your loss.

Regis wrote:
He’s still the King, even after death. That’s the point.  there is only one GOAT there is only one Hurricane. there is only one Bomber there...

He’s still the King, even after death. That’s the point. 

there is only one GOAT

there is only one Hurricane.

there is only one Bomber

there is only one jammin

there is only one O’show

there is only one Flyin Freckle. 

there is only one Golden Boy

there is only one Magoo

there is only one Burner

there is only one Dogger

there is only one Fro

there is only one sting-ray

there is only one budman

there is only one too-tall

there is only one cobra 

there is only one holeshot

there is only one flyin hawaiian

there Is only one big bird

there is only one Red Dog

there is only one airtime

there is only one the rock

these are all relevant today.

Nicknames are not repeated or passed on. MC was soooo good he had two.  Showtime and KING.  Now and forever.

All that effort and no Hollywood. 

6
1
hellion
Posts
1085
Joined
12/19/2009
Location
Westfield, MA US
1/24/2024 8:25pm Edited Date/Time 1/24/2024 8:31pm

You can only relate to what you’ve actually witnessed.  Reading about it or hearing stories only goes so far.  I grew up watching Bob Hannah, then RJ, then Bradshaw, then MC etc.   So I know how amazing they each were.  
 

You can tell me how great Tony Distefano or Gary Jones was but it has no impact on me as I didn’t see it.  

 

Any of the greats would be great today given the modern training and machinery. MC won a staggering number of races, against many great riders.  He is the King. Long live the King

The Shop

Boggins
Posts
402
Joined
7/30/2019
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA US
1/24/2024 8:37pm

Tough to compare young generation to older generations in Moto, F1, NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, etc.

McGrath is not only the King of SX, but is close the Man (RDecoster) in staying relevant a long time past retirement, and is still impacting the sport.  It is also very special to see McGrath at Mammoth, World Vet, and local races. He is very approachable, easy going and talks with most fans at the track....and most importantly, almost all people have great things to say about him.

The Greats are all great!

 

10
1/24/2024 8:58pm
OwenJakes wrote:

Lots of votes for relevant. explain your side for me.

So how old are you exactly? In 1999 there were 18 full factory riders and a couple of satellite riders on a 20 man gate. This was pre-KTM Group with 3 factory programs. And please explain to me how they are more "factory" now than before. The Yamaha, Kawi, Honda tracks are still in the exact same places they've been for about 30 years. Not much has changed. Winning a SX race is difficult, in any era. You can't just decide that one era is more difficult than another. Now, are the guys better riders now than before? That's debatable and here's why. How much better is the equipment now compared to the '90's? I would say massively better, EFI vs. a carb?? Suspension components , better engineers, etc, etc. Are the riders going faster, yes, but on better bikes, so to debate the era's is futile. 

You also probably think Lebron is better than MJ. Championships and race wins trumps your feelings everyday of the week and twice on Saturday nights!

And as an FYI, Jeremy was fucking difficult to beat. 

11
Hank_Thrill
Posts
4647
Joined
9/22/2008
Location
Arlen, TX US
1/24/2024 9:03pm

His level of progression was about a decade ahead of his competition. Still relevant. 

3
zehn
Posts
7861
Joined
1/15/2013
Location
Anchorage, AK US
1/24/2024 9:04pm
OwenJakes wrote:

Lots of votes for relevant. explain your side for me.

So how old are you exactly? In 1999 there were 18 full factory riders and a couple of satellite riders on a 20 man gate. This...

So how old are you exactly? In 1999 there were 18 full factory riders and a couple of satellite riders on a 20 man gate. This was pre-KTM Group with 3 factory programs. And please explain to me how they are more "factory" now than before. The Yamaha, Kawi, Honda tracks are still in the exact same places they've been for about 30 years. Not much has changed. Winning a SX race is difficult, in any era. You can't just decide that one era is more difficult than another. Now, are the guys better riders now than before? That's debatable and here's why. How much better is the equipment now compared to the '90's? I would say massively better, EFI vs. a carb?? Suspension components , better engineers, etc, etc. Are the riders going faster, yes, but on better bikes, so to debate the era's is futile. 

You also probably think Lebron is better than MJ. Championships and race wins trumps your feelings everyday of the week and twice on Saturday nights!

And as an FYI, Jeremy was fucking difficult to beat. 

Today’s technique is far better than it was even 25 years ago. The guys racing in 1999 could learn that technique if they were current pros

3
jeffro503
Posts
27629
Joined
7/22/2007
Location
St Helens, OR US
1/24/2024 9:30pm
OwenJakes wrote:
I made a single comment on a thread and was genuinely shocked by the +/- ratio but didnt want to derail the thread. This site is...

I made a single comment on a thread and was genuinely shocked by the +/- ratio but didnt want to derail the thread. This site is largely 45 and up dudes so I understand I'm going to be getting the golden era rage but I really want to know some opinions.

How is it that we equate 90's supercross to the ~2010 and onward era of full factory race teams, training facility living, and 15/20 riders on the gate being some form of past or current champion. Mcgrath did not line up against 17 factory bikes or whatever it is. I'm not saying the guy sucks but come on. A1 had the entire top 10 within one second of the lap times at one point.

I just don't see it. You cannot tell me that Tomac, Dungey, Stew, RV, etc, faced a similar challenge than Mcgrath did. I think the record is total apples to oranges and is tone deaf to keep comparing people to McGrath.

McGraths record is not relevant, change my mind.

You might want to study even harder this time around , on your ratio , right here , on this thread. 

" It's stupid ".....hence why you have a 99% thumbs down on it.  Maybe try thinking a bit different , or actually understanding the sport better would help? 

4
2
Sully
Posts
9195
Joined
8/24/2006
Location
JP
1/24/2024 9:56pm
DonM wrote:

Stop....Are you seriously trying to compare Leisk's career with Wardy's?....seriously...Leisk was a badass, but wasn't even in the same league as Wardy...

Are you saying 2 riders who finish 1 place from each other aren't a similar speed?

Are you saying 2 riders who finish 1 place from each other aren't a similar speed?

image-20240125145947-2

DonM wrote:
Are you seriously using one year of Wardy's career as a comparison? Leisk was a bad ass and had a great career but in comparison to...

Are you seriously using one year of Wardy's career as a comparison? Leisk was a bad ass and had a great career but in comparison to Wardy's he wasn't even close...

Based on the image, it looks like he's trying to use one race (Daytona). Overall for the year (1988), though, Wardy was 3rd in SX (Leisk was 6th), 1st in 250MX (Leisk again 6th) and 5th in 500MX (Leisk was 3rd), so he had a much better year. Wardy was also part of Team USA winning the MXdN, but he rode a 125 to Leisk's 500, so not comparable.

1
1
1/24/2024 10:38pm
Are you saying 2 riders who finish 1 place from each other aren't a similar speed?

Are you saying 2 riders who finish 1 place from each other aren't a similar speed?

image-20240125145947-2

DonM wrote:
Are you seriously using one year of Wardy's career as a comparison? Leisk was a bad ass and had a great career but in comparison to...

Are you seriously using one year of Wardy's career as a comparison? Leisk was a bad ass and had a great career but in comparison to Wardy's he wasn't even close...

Sully wrote:
Based on the image, it looks like he's trying to use one race (Daytona). Overall for the year (1988), though, Wardy was 3rd in SX (Leisk...

Based on the image, it looks like he's trying to use one race (Daytona). Overall for the year (1988), though, Wardy was 3rd in SX (Leisk was 6th), 1st in 250MX (Leisk again 6th) and 5th in 500MX (Leisk was 3rd), so he had a much better year. Wardy was also part of Team USA winning the MXdN, but he rode a 125 to Leisk's 500, so not comparable.

@Regis claimed there was only one "flying freckle", that is incorrect, there are 2 professional riders who were known as "the flying freckle".

The photo I posted showed them next to each other on the starting gate of the 1988 Daytona supercross, they finished within 1 position of each other, to do that they had similar speed, not the same speed, but similar speed on that day, at that track. They were both great riders.

Ricky Carmichael is known as the King of supercross, Ricky Carmichael is known as the GOAT, but some time in the future, somebody will come along and take their titles, records are made to be broken, crowns don't last forever.

16
sumdood
Posts
8659
Joined
3/11/2013
Location
San Clemente, CA US
Fantasy
1/24/2024 11:34pm

Fun McGrath fact. When our daughter was in the Navy she was on the Ronald Reagan carrier. (CVN76) Mcgrath showed up onboard on one of her deployments and bullshitted and swapped stories with the sailors. Nothing about it in the Magazines or internet, no attention seeking about it. Just hanging out swapping stories and taking a few pictures with the crew. The guys a class act besides being the winningest supercross rider ever. Why someone would start a thread to downplay his role in the sport is beyond me. OP must've really wanted to bitch about something. Surely there has to be a better fish to throw in the roasting pan than MC.  

18
Richy
Posts
3086
Joined
7/18/2020
Location
UK GB
1/24/2024 11:46pm Edited Date/Time 1/25/2024 11:43pm
sumdood wrote:
Fun McGrath fact. When our daughter was in the Navy she was on the Ronald Reagan carrier. (CVN76) Mcgrath showed up onboard on one of her...

Fun McGrath fact. When our daughter was in the Navy she was on the Ronald Reagan carrier. (CVN76) Mcgrath showed up onboard on one of her deployments and bullshitted and swapped stories with the sailors. Nothing about it in the Magazines or internet, no attention seeking about it. Just hanging out swapping stories and taking a few pictures with the crew. The guys a class act besides being the winningest supercross rider ever. Why someone would start a thread to downplay his role in the sport is beyond me. OP must've really wanted to bitch about something. Surely there has to be a better fish to throw in the roasting pan than MC.  

Great story, hearing things like that just add to the legend 👍

4
Lippy111
Posts
86
Joined
2/16/2013
Location
Newcastle, NSW AU
1/24/2024 11:54pm Edited Date/Time 1/25/2024 12:07am
Regis wrote:
He’s still the King, even after death. That’s the point.  there is only one GOAT there is only one Hurricane. there is only one Bomber there...

He’s still the King, even after death. That’s the point. 

there is only one GOAT

there is only one Hurricane.

there is only one Bomber

there is only one jammin

there is only one O’show

there is only one Flyin Freckle. 

there is only one Golden Boy

there is only one Magoo

there is only one Burner

there is only one Dogger

there is only one Fro

there is only one sting-ray

there is only one budman

there is only one too-tall

there is only one cobra 

there is only one holeshot

there is only one flyin hawaiian

there Is only one big bird

there is only one Red Dog

there is only one airtime

there is only one the rock

these are all relevant today.

Nicknames are not repeated or passed on. MC was soooo good he had two.  Showtime and KING.  Now and forever.

I love this post. So many iconic nicknames. Not to derail the thread, but I've got some more. See if anyone can pick the riders. Most of them are pretty easy. In no particular order....

 

Yogi

Hollywood

The Diesel

Factory

One Punch

Chicken

Ernie

The Little Professor

RonRon

Hot Sauce

Wacho

Ping

El Hombre

Nate Dog

The Doctor

Mini Coop

Rocket

Troll

Shorty

Holeshot

Seven Deuce Deuce

Mookie

MX Kied

Bam Bam

Kickstart

The Professor

Philthy

The Beast From The East

El Chupacabra

The Cowboy

Junkyard Dog

Bad Boy

Six Time

The Man

 

Have Fun!!!

5
1
Bluelion
Posts
1272
Joined
9/10/2013
Location
Lafayette, IN US
1/25/2024 3:29am
OwenJakes wrote:

Lots of votes for relevant. explain your side for me.

The math of the situation makes it relevant. even if somebody had multiple perfect seasons, it would take 4.2 years to get 72 wins. just think about that math for a minute? you cannot lose a race for 4.2 years to get 72 wins. So let’s cut that number in half. If you won half the races every season, it would take 8.4 years to get 72 wins. And so on.
All the variables involved to achieve 72 wins in a career is mind-boggling. just the last two races is proof of those variables that you cannot predict on achieving that amount of wins in a career..

6
1/25/2024 3:44am Edited Date/Time 1/25/2024 2:53pm
OwenJakes wrote:

Lots of votes for relevant. explain your side for me.

Bluelion wrote:
The math of the situation makes it relevant. even if somebody had multiple perfect seasons, it would take 4.2 years to get 72 wins. just think about...

The math of the situation makes it relevant. even if somebody had multiple perfect seasons, it would take 4.2 years to get 72 wins. just think about that math for a minute? you cannot lose a race for 4.2 years to get 72 wins. So let’s cut that number in half. If you won half the races every season, it would take 8.4 years to get 72 wins. And so on.
All the variables involved to achieve 72 wins in a career is mind-boggling. just the last two races is proof of those variables that you cannot predict on achieving that amount of wins in a career..

Yet it has been done by McGrath, so it's possible to do, if one person can do it, another person can do it.

A perfect motocross season was considered impossible until Carmichael did it, now it's been done four times.

1
6
Bluelion
Posts
1272
Joined
9/10/2013
Location
Lafayette, IN US
1/25/2024 4:06am
OwenJakes wrote:

Lots of votes for relevant. explain your side for me.

Bluelion wrote:
The math of the situation makes it relevant. even if somebody had multiple perfect seasons, it would take 4.2 years to get 72 wins. just think about...

The math of the situation makes it relevant. even if somebody had multiple perfect seasons, it would take 4.2 years to get 72 wins. just think about that math for a minute? you cannot lose a race for 4.2 years to get 72 wins. So let’s cut that number in half. If you won half the races every season, it would take 8.4 years to get 72 wins. And so on.
All the variables involved to achieve 72 wins in a career is mind-boggling. just the last two races is proof of those variables that you cannot predict on achieving that amount of wins in a career..

Yet it has been done by McGrath, so it's possible to do, if one person can do it, another person can do it. A perfect motocross...

Yet it has been done by McGrath, so it's possible to do, if one person can do it, another person can do it.

A perfect motocross season was considered impossible until Carmichael did it, now it's been done four times.

I never said it was impossible for someone to do. I said this is the reason McGrath is still king of SX and is relevant. The math of the record speaks volumes of how hard it is to do.

7
Regis
Posts
2767
Joined
6/17/2008
Location
Gonzales, LA US
Fantasy
1/25/2024 4:52am

I've got some bad news for you, Elvis is dead, sorry for your loss.

Regis wrote:
He’s still the King, even after death. That’s the point.  there is only one GOAT there is only one Hurricane. there is only one Bomber there...

He’s still the King, even after death. That’s the point. 

there is only one GOAT

there is only one Hurricane.

there is only one Bomber

there is only one jammin

there is only one O’show

there is only one Flyin Freckle. 

there is only one Golden Boy

there is only one Magoo

there is only one Burner

there is only one Dogger

there is only one Fro

there is only one sting-ray

there is only one budman

there is only one too-tall

there is only one cobra 

there is only one holeshot

there is only one flyin hawaiian

there Is only one big bird

there is only one Red Dog

there is only one airtime

there is only one the rock

these are all relevant today.

Nicknames are not repeated or passed on. MC was soooo good he had two.  Showtime and KING.  Now and forever.

-MAVERICK- wrote:

All that effort and no Hollywood. 

OMG

cannot believe I forgot Hollywood.

Regis
Posts
2767
Joined
6/17/2008
Location
Gonzales, LA US
Fantasy
1/25/2024 4:53am
OwenJakes wrote:

Lots of votes for relevant. explain your side for me.

Bluelion wrote:
The math of the situation makes it relevant. even if somebody had multiple perfect seasons, it would take 4.2 years to get 72 wins. just think about...

The math of the situation makes it relevant. even if somebody had multiple perfect seasons, it would take 4.2 years to get 72 wins. just think about that math for a minute? you cannot lose a race for 4.2 years to get 72 wins. So let’s cut that number in half. If you won half the races every season, it would take 8.4 years to get 72 wins. And so on.
All the variables involved to achieve 72 wins in a career is mind-boggling. just the last two races is proof of those variables that you cannot predict on achieving that amount of wins in a career..

Well done

kage173
Posts
2964
Joined
11/27/2015
Location
TX US
1/25/2024 5:21am

OP definitely screams "DEEPEST FIELD EVER" at A1 every single year

TAUTOG
Posts
1583
Joined
1/27/2023
Location
Mohrsville, PA US
1/25/2024 5:34am
Magoofan wrote:

image-20240124181647-1

What show/movie is this? Friends?

OwenJakes
Posts
1681
Joined
6/30/2023
Location
sebree, KY US
1/25/2024 6:05am Edited Date/Time 1/25/2024 6:05am

Everyone took it so personal, like MC is your uncle or something. I never said anything about him as a rider just the records and whether it was relevant today given how the sport is changed. My position is that the 72 wins thing is not apples to oranges. You guys are in here talking about how he visited marines or something on the carrier and how he's nice to fans at races. What?? What is wrong with you lmao

32
OwenJakes
Posts
1681
Joined
6/30/2023
Location
sebree, KY US
1/25/2024 6:07am
kage173 wrote:

OP definitely screams "DEEPEST FIELD EVER" at A1 every single year

dude that was so funny and heckin relevant I hope you get a lot of likes for that comment because that is literally me.

1
11
Big Ragu
Posts
29
Joined
3/8/2017
Location
Greenville, SC US
1/25/2024 6:12am
OwenJakes wrote:
I made a single comment on a thread and was genuinely shocked by the +/- ratio but didnt want to derail the thread. This site is...

I made a single comment on a thread and was genuinely shocked by the +/- ratio but didnt want to derail the thread. This site is largely 45 and up dudes so I understand I'm going to be getting the golden era rage but I really want to know some opinions.

How is it that we equate 90's supercross to the ~2010 and onward era of full factory race teams, training facility living, and 15/20 riders on the gate being some form of past or current champion. Mcgrath did not line up against 17 factory bikes or whatever it is. I'm not saying the guy sucks but come on. A1 had the entire top 10 within one second of the lap times at one point.

I just don't see it. You cannot tell me that Tomac, Dungey, Stew, RV, etc, faced a similar challenge than Mcgrath did. I think the record is total apples to oranges and is tone deaf to keep comparing people to McGrath.

McGraths record is not relevant, change my mind.

'Cause we need a placeholder until Jett crushes 72 Wink

4
earthmx
Posts
43
Joined
3/8/2020
Location
Riverside, CA US
1/25/2024 6:17am
mxb2 wrote:

Record book says. 72.  The end of story

OwenJakes wrote:

tremendously low iq take

The wins should speak for themselves but another reason I think it is very relevant Is the fact Jeremy did quite a bit to bring the sport more mainstream as well as setting the stage for the current riders to receive bigger paychecks, he also brought in numerous sponsors outside of the industry. Of course you have your opinion and others have theirs

1
-MAVERICK-
Posts
65515
Joined
3/26/2015
Location
Ontario CA
1/25/2024 6:57am
Magoofan wrote:

image-20240124181647-1

TAUTOG wrote:

What show/movie is this? Friends?

Friends. 

3
1/25/2024 7:01am Edited Date/Time 1/25/2024 7:03am
OwenJakes wrote:
Everyone took it so personal, like MC is your uncle or something. I never said anything about him as a rider just the records and whether...

Everyone took it so personal, like MC is your uncle or something. I never said anything about him as a rider just the records and whether it was relevant today given how the sport is changed. My position is that the 72 wins thing is not apples to oranges. You guys are in here talking about how he visited marines or something on the carrier and how he's nice to fans at races. What?? What is wrong with you lmao

I am not sure what response you are looking for out of people. I mean what do you mean its not "apples to oranges" are you saying his wins aren't irrelevant bc he raced before you watched the sport? Like I am not getting the specific points you are making to signify his wins being "easier". 

It is really not that hard, you line up 20 guys on the gate and drop the fucker, whoever wins, wins. He won 72 times, and won 7 titles.

If you want to make a case for some titles being easier than others, sure. But that extends much outside of MC. Dungey, Reed, etc all won titles in years where the field was mostly depleted...

1
1
Kawboy14!
Posts
496
Joined
5/15/2021
Location
Georgetown, TX US
1/25/2024 7:22am

Until someone knocks him off, he’s the king of all times!

1
Magoofan
Posts
10401
Joined
5/4/2021
Location
Shadow Glen (for those who remember), CA US
1/25/2024 7:22am
Magoofan wrote:

image-20240124181647-1

TAUTOG wrote:

What show/movie is this? Friends?

Yes.  It was Friends.   Funny thing is, I just learned about this a few years ago myself here on good ol Vital. 

 

1

Post a reply to: Why is McGrath "The King" in the Current Era?

The Latest