Washington Rider Shot and Killed

early
Posts
9765
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH US
10/5/2023 9:39am
FGR01 wrote:
Some of you need to go back and read my post.  This occurred on FEDERAL property.   State laws about trespassing, stand your ground, yadda yadda... are...

Some of you need to go back and read my post.  This occurred on FEDERAL property.   State laws about trespassing, stand your ground, yadda yadda... are irrelevant.   This appears to not be a case of a crazy private property owner over reacting.  This appears to be a case of a Federal Agent protecting federal property/critical infrastructure.  If you are not familiar with the Federal laws pertaining to trespassing on federal property/critical infrastructure or the Rules of engagement that Federal Officers have to protect that, you really should not comment.

Looks like this property houses the transmission lines from the Grand Coullee dam to the substation. These may be the only transmission lines that service Spokane from the dam, but I could be wrong.

10/5/2023 10:26am Edited Date/Time 10/5/2023 10:27am

Satelite view is interesting. You can see the sub station, power lines and what looks like some trails in the area.

I seem to remember last year there was a rash of vandalism at sub stations around the northwest. I assume guys using the transformers for target practice. For a spell they were wondering if it was coordinated and a form of domestic terrorism. Just going off memory.

I'm not saying at all that that's what the guys were doing, but it does explain heightened security. In fact, ever since 9/11, the dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers got a LOT MORE SECURE. High powered cameras, guard stations, restricting the public from viewing fish ladders, boat locks and driving over the dams like a bridge. It really sucks to be honest. 

https://www.google.com/maps/place/2400+E+Hawthorne+Rd,+Mead,+WA+99021/@47.7501184,-117.3835593,1148m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x549e1dcc9cc067c5:0x57632294a1c250cd!8m2!3d47.7521344!4d-117.3726172!16s%2Fg%2F11c1jwqf5m?entry=ttu

8
10/5/2023 10:56am

What the fuck is wrong with people? Was it justified to shoot someone dead over a dispute? Was the guy who got shot overly aggressive? I really dislike the times we live in. 

Is this how the 2nd ammendment is supposed to work?

6
29
10/5/2023 10:58am

I doesnt sound like they were shot simply for riding their dirt bikes illegally on private property... From the KREM article, a physical altercation started between one of the riders and a security guard, then a 2nd rider got involved in the altercation.  I know we shouldn't speculate, but if I had to guess, sounds like the security guard grabbed the kid and then the dad got involved. 

3
1

The Shop

TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO US
10/5/2023 11:02am

This is why it’s better to just avoid confrontation. Your life isn’t worth your ego. 

12
GangGreen
Posts
470
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mechanicsburg, PA US
10/5/2023 11:03am
Farmer J wrote:

People need to quit trespassing.  

Shot forTrespassing - Not justified.   If the trail/ track is there and has been there Farmer J, it's not yours, even if you buy the land !!!

Shot for Physical Altercation - Always justified.

Actually, U.S. Citizens NEVER really own their land, so how could a Power Company.   Appears there are plenty of good riding around that area.

image-20231005135842-1

21
DEMONDAVE
Posts
673
Joined
9/6/2013
Location
Apple Valley, CA US
10/5/2023 11:03am
Meister wrote:

But yet the biker boys roam city streets n not one gets what they deserve. 

i agree HOWEVER tread lightly it seems the biker boys / bikelife / chino are highly protected / coveted here , seen a few posts clipped over that. 

3
14
FGR01
Posts
5989
Joined
10/1/2006
Location
AZ US
Fantasy
10/5/2023 11:05am
Boomslang wrote:
What the fuck is wrong with people? Was it justified to shoot someone dead over a dispute? Was the guy who got shot overly aggressive? I...

What the fuck is wrong with people? Was it justified to shoot someone dead over a dispute? Was the guy who got shot overly aggressive? I really dislike the times we live in. 

Is this how the 2nd ammendment is supposed to work?

I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man.

This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens.

This was a law enforcement encounter between a Federal Agent protecting Federal restricted land and 2 private citizens trespassing upon that land without authorization.  

While we do not know all the facts, we do know that much and we do know that 2 private citizens became engaged in a physical fight with a federal law enforcement official who was legally protecting federal land when he apparently contacted them about their illegal trespassing upon that federal land.  Draw your own conclusions from there, but logic dictates that when you are caught trespassing by a federal agent on restricted land you probably should not contest and get into a fight with that federal agent.

23
3
10/5/2023 11:13am
Boomslang wrote:
What the fuck is wrong with people? Was it justified to shoot someone dead over a dispute? Was the guy who got shot overly aggressive? I...

What the fuck is wrong with people? Was it justified to shoot someone dead over a dispute? Was the guy who got shot overly aggressive? I really dislike the times we live in. 

Is this how the 2nd ammendment is supposed to work?

FGR01 wrote:
I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man. This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens. This was...

I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man.

This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens.

This was a law enforcement encounter between a Federal Agent protecting Federal restricted land and 2 private citizens trespassing upon that land without authorization.  

While we do not know all the facts, we do know that much and we do know that 2 private citizens became engaged in a physical fight with a federal law enforcement official who was legally protecting federal land when he apparently contacted them about their illegal trespassing upon that federal land.  Draw your own conclusions from there, but logic dictates that when you are caught trespassing by a federal agent on restricted land you probably should not contest and get into a fight with that federal agent.

I'm sorry for asking but it just appears so unnecessary and unfortunate for the dude who got shot. It find it disturbing and feel pain for his family. May he RIP...

6
9
GPrider
Posts
741
Joined
4/10/2014
Location
La Mesa, CA US
10/5/2023 11:15am Edited Date/Time 10/5/2023 11:16am
FGR01 wrote:
I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man. This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens. This was...

I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man.

This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens.

This was a law enforcement encounter between a Federal Agent protecting Federal restricted land and 2 private citizens trespassing upon that land without authorization.  

While we do not know all the facts, we do know that much and we do know that 2 private citizens became engaged in a physical fight with a federal law enforcement official who was legally protecting federal land when he apparently contacted them about their illegal trespassing upon that federal land.  Draw your own conclusions from there, but logic dictates that when you are caught trespassing by a federal agent on restricted land you probably should not contest and get into a fight with that federal agent.

agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because it was on federal land, Miramar navel base stated patrolling it and arresting us all, and not with a smile. Getting thrown in the brig and pushed around. Running from them was not an option. I am guessing getting into a physical confrontation would possibly also end badly. Those guys don't fuck around. Just sayin

9
1
early
Posts
9765
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH US
10/5/2023 11:18am
Boomslang wrote:
What the fuck is wrong with people? Was it justified to shoot someone dead over a dispute? Was the guy who got shot overly aggressive? I...

What the fuck is wrong with people? Was it justified to shoot someone dead over a dispute? Was the guy who got shot overly aggressive? I really dislike the times we live in. 

Is this how the 2nd ammendment is supposed to work?

Not a second amendment issue necessarily, but getting in a fiight with a guy with a gun is the kind of behavior that's supposed to be discouraged when people say an armed society is a polite society. 

6
Andrew314
Posts
181
Joined
9/29/2023
Location
Montrose, CO US
10/5/2023 11:20am

The federal government has been taken over by communists. They will kill you without hesitation. Avoid any interaction with the Feds at all costs.

8
43
8tensolutions
Posts
3301
Joined
11/15/2009
Location
Salt Lake City, UT US
10/5/2023 11:23am Edited Date/Time 10/5/2023 11:24am
FGR01 wrote:
I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man. This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens. This was...

I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man.

This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens.

This was a law enforcement encounter between a Federal Agent protecting Federal restricted land and 2 private citizens trespassing upon that land without authorization.  

While we do not know all the facts, we do know that much and we do know that 2 private citizens became engaged in a physical fight with a federal law enforcement official who was legally protecting federal land when he apparently contacted them about their illegal trespassing upon that federal land.  Draw your own conclusions from there, but logic dictates that when you are caught trespassing by a federal agent on restricted land you probably should not contest and get into a fight with that federal agent.

GPrider wrote:
agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because...

agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because it was on federal land, Miramar navel base stated patrolling it and arresting us all, and not with a smile. Getting thrown in the brig and pushed around. Running from them was not an option. I am guessing getting into a physical confrontation would possibly also end badly. Those guys don't fuck around. Just sayin

It is incredible to me people posting here apparently cannot read.  This was not farmer Bob kicking them off his land by shooting them and has zero to do with the 2nd amendment.  This is on federal land and the "guard" was a federal agent. 

How in the hell do you get into a physical altercation with a federal agent or any law enforcement?  I don't know, but it will not end well.  I highly doubt the agent just shot them for riding dirt bikes.

I have no idea what actually happened and we never will, but just trying to share this is not a gun ownership issue or citizen dispute.

29
1
mxb2
Posts
22437
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD US
10/5/2023 11:30am
FGR01 wrote:
I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man. This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens. This was...

I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man.

This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens.

This was a law enforcement encounter between a Federal Agent protecting Federal restricted land and 2 private citizens trespassing upon that land without authorization.  

While we do not know all the facts, we do know that much and we do know that 2 private citizens became engaged in a physical fight with a federal law enforcement official who was legally protecting federal land when he apparently contacted them about their illegal trespassing upon that federal land.  Draw your own conclusions from there, but logic dictates that when you are caught trespassing by a federal agent on restricted land you probably should not contest and get into a fight with that federal agent.

GPrider wrote:
agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because...

agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because it was on federal land, Miramar navel base stated patrolling it and arresting us all, and not with a smile. Getting thrown in the brig and pushed around. Running from them was not an option. I am guessing getting into a physical confrontation would possibly also end badly. Those guys don't fuck around. Just sayin

It is incredible to me people posting here apparently cannot read.  This was not farmer Bob kicking them off his land by shooting them and has...

It is incredible to me people posting here apparently cannot read.  This was not farmer Bob kicking them off his land by shooting them and has zero to do with the 2nd amendment.  This is on federal land and the "guard" was a federal agent. 

How in the hell do you get into a physical altercation with a federal agent or any law enforcement?  I don't know, but it will not end well.  I highly doubt the agent just shot them for riding dirt bikes.

I have no idea what actually happened and we never will, but just trying to share this is not a gun ownership issue or citizen dispute.

Bingo. 

2
1
10/5/2023 12:05pm

Two guys get in a physical altercation with an armed federal security guard.  Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

I used to get harassed by cops for riding where I shouldn’t be quite a bit back in the day.  I always ran from them, not toward them.

9
10/5/2023 12:06pm
FGR01 wrote:
I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man. This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens. This was...

I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man.

This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens.

This was a law enforcement encounter between a Federal Agent protecting Federal restricted land and 2 private citizens trespassing upon that land without authorization.  

While we do not know all the facts, we do know that much and we do know that 2 private citizens became engaged in a physical fight with a federal law enforcement official who was legally protecting federal land when he apparently contacted them about their illegal trespassing upon that federal land.  Draw your own conclusions from there, but logic dictates that when you are caught trespassing by a federal agent on restricted land you probably should not contest and get into a fight with that federal agent.

GPrider wrote:
agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because...

agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because it was on federal land, Miramar navel base stated patrolling it and arresting us all, and not with a smile. Getting thrown in the brig and pushed around. Running from them was not an option. I am guessing getting into a physical confrontation would possibly also end badly. Those guys don't fuck around. Just sayin

Federal government uses contractors for security all the time. 

7
mxb2
Posts
22437
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD US
10/5/2023 12:10pm
FGR01 wrote:
I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man. This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens. This was...

I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man.

This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens.

This was a law enforcement encounter between a Federal Agent protecting Federal restricted land and 2 private citizens trespassing upon that land without authorization.  

While we do not know all the facts, we do know that much and we do know that 2 private citizens became engaged in a physical fight with a federal law enforcement official who was legally protecting federal land when he apparently contacted them about their illegal trespassing upon that federal land.  Draw your own conclusions from there, but logic dictates that when you are caught trespassing by a federal agent on restricted land you probably should not contest and get into a fight with that federal agent.

GPrider wrote:
agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because...

agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because it was on federal land, Miramar navel base stated patrolling it and arresting us all, and not with a smile. Getting thrown in the brig and pushed around. Running from them was not an option. I am guessing getting into a physical confrontation would possibly also end badly. Those guys don't fuck around. Just sayin

Federal government uses contractors for security all the time. 

And some places hire police for extra $$ and security in certain spots. Plenty police depts let their officers work security for extra $$

2
10/5/2023 12:10pm

Sorry, can someone explain what makes a federal agent so special? Are they not the same as law enforcement? 

I'm from Africa so forgive me.

5
4
jnickell
Posts
435
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
CA US
10/5/2023 12:13pm
FGR01 wrote:
I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man. This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens. This was...

I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man.

This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens.

This was a law enforcement encounter between a Federal Agent protecting Federal restricted land and 2 private citizens trespassing upon that land without authorization.  

While we do not know all the facts, we do know that much and we do know that 2 private citizens became engaged in a physical fight with a federal law enforcement official who was legally protecting federal land when he apparently contacted them about their illegal trespassing upon that federal land.  Draw your own conclusions from there, but logic dictates that when you are caught trespassing by a federal agent on restricted land you probably should not contest and get into a fight with that federal agent.

GPrider wrote:
agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because...

agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because it was on federal land, Miramar navel base stated patrolling it and arresting us all, and not with a smile. Getting thrown in the brig and pushed around. Running from them was not an option. I am guessing getting into a physical confrontation would possibly also end badly. Those guys don't fuck around. Just sayin

It is incredible to me people posting here apparently cannot read.  This was not farmer Bob kicking them off his land by shooting them and has...

It is incredible to me people posting here apparently cannot read.  This was not farmer Bob kicking them off his land by shooting them and has zero to do with the 2nd amendment.  This is on federal land and the "guard" was a federal agent. 

How in the hell do you get into a physical altercation with a federal agent or any law enforcement?  I don't know, but it will not end well.  I highly doubt the agent just shot them for riding dirt bikes.

I have no idea what actually happened and we never will, but just trying to share this is not a gun ownership issue or citizen dispute.

Agreed.  Let's also consider the federal agent's position. Joe Blow fed agent is tasked with guarding an important piece of infrastructure. A couple of folks ride up on dirt bikes, and he confronts them. Things get physical when the rider acts like a hard guy in front of his son. The agent, who is carrying, considers what could happen if the rider immobilizes him with Jiu Jitsu, a left hook or any other aggressive action and takes his gun. One of the burdens of being armed is wrestling with the idea that if your gun isn't used quickly enough, it could be used on you. Especially out in the middle of nowhere. The other side of it is using it too quickly.

This scenario is pure speculation but it's no different than you dudes saying the agent just gunned him down without cause. Either way, RIP brother.

6
3
Radical
Posts
2820
Joined
10/20/2012
Location
San Diego, CA US
10/5/2023 12:19pm
FGR01 wrote:
I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man. This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens. This was...

I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man.

This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens.

This was a law enforcement encounter between a Federal Agent protecting Federal restricted land and 2 private citizens trespassing upon that land without authorization.  

While we do not know all the facts, we do know that much and we do know that 2 private citizens became engaged in a physical fight with a federal law enforcement official who was legally protecting federal land when he apparently contacted them about their illegal trespassing upon that federal land.  Draw your own conclusions from there, but logic dictates that when you are caught trespassing by a federal agent on restricted land you probably should not contest and get into a fight with that federal agent.

GPrider wrote:
agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because...

agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because it was on federal land, Miramar navel base stated patrolling it and arresting us all, and not with a smile. Getting thrown in the brig and pushed around. Running from them was not an option. I am guessing getting into a physical confrontation would possibly also end badly. Those guys don't fuck around. Just sayin

It is incredible to me people posting here apparently cannot read.  This was not farmer Bob kicking them off his land by shooting them and has...

It is incredible to me people posting here apparently cannot read.  This was not farmer Bob kicking them off his land by shooting them and has zero to do with the 2nd amendment.  This is on federal land and the "guard" was a federal agent. 

How in the hell do you get into a physical altercation with a federal agent or any law enforcement?  I don't know, but it will not end well.  I highly doubt the agent just shot them for riding dirt bikes.

I have no idea what actually happened and we never will, but just trying to share this is not a gun ownership issue or citizen dispute.

If they're attacking my son, I'm going to protect him, even if it costs me my life.

Resolving issues without violence should always be the first goal, but mess with someone's kid, there's going to be trouble.

We need to see details on what happened.  It's possible the victim and his son handled the interaction poorly, but it could also turn out that the security guard is at fault.  If he is, I could give a F whether he's a federal agent.  He needs to be held accountable.

The rules of engagement in this country should be equal for everyone, whether or not they're in law enforcement.

If it's not right for a citizen to shoot someone, it should not be OK for law enforcement to shoot someone in that exact same situation.

8
12
10/5/2023 12:21pm

Before looking at google maps I was picturing a bunch of vast forestry land but that's not the case, this property is actually in town.  It's a few flat lots in an industrial area with several turn tracks located around the property.  Before knowing it was a federal agent on federal property I would have pictured the riders possibly trying to run from a rent-a-cop out in the boonies which always results in tempers flaring.  A lot of us have done this.  One time a big group of us ran and then found the ranger and sheriff waiting at our trucks when we got back.  They were understandably pissed and gave us all tickets/fines.  

But looking at this property I don't think anyone would try to run as it's a very small piece of property.  Without a rent-a-cop being involved, not sure how a rider would get into an altercation with a Federal Agent.

1
3
mxb2
Posts
22437
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD US
10/5/2023 12:26pm
GPrider wrote:
agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because...

agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because it was on federal land, Miramar navel base stated patrolling it and arresting us all, and not with a smile. Getting thrown in the brig and pushed around. Running from them was not an option. I am guessing getting into a physical confrontation would possibly also end badly. Those guys don't fuck around. Just sayin

It is incredible to me people posting here apparently cannot read.  This was not farmer Bob kicking them off his land by shooting them and has...

It is incredible to me people posting here apparently cannot read.  This was not farmer Bob kicking them off his land by shooting them and has zero to do with the 2nd amendment.  This is on federal land and the "guard" was a federal agent. 

How in the hell do you get into a physical altercation with a federal agent or any law enforcement?  I don't know, but it will not end well.  I highly doubt the agent just shot them for riding dirt bikes.

I have no idea what actually happened and we never will, but just trying to share this is not a gun ownership issue or citizen dispute.

Radical wrote:
If they're attacking my son, I'm going to protect him, even if it costs me my life. Resolving issues without violence should always be the first...

If they're attacking my son, I'm going to protect him, even if it costs me my life.

Resolving issues without violence should always be the first goal, but mess with someone's kid, there's going to be trouble.

We need to see details on what happened.  It's possible the victim and his son handled the interaction poorly, but it could also turn out that the security guard is at fault.  If he is, I could give a F whether he's a federal agent.  He needs to be held accountable.

The rules of engagement in this country should be equal for everyone, whether or not they're in law enforcement.

If it's not right for a citizen to shoot someone, it should not be OK for law enforcement to shoot someone in that exact same situation.

Would you take a child on private property?   And if approached by police,security etc, refuse to cooperate? Knowing you dont belong there? 

9
2
whyZ
Posts
1158
Joined
4/15/2009
Location
Phoenix, AZ US
10/5/2023 12:31pm

In the article tagged in Josh42 post, it' states, "Witnesses to the altercation....."  How many witnesses are they talking about?  Are these more feds, or other dirt bike riders, riding in what the satellite photo shows as a pretty common place to ride.  

1
2
GPrider
Posts
741
Joined
4/10/2014
Location
La Mesa, CA US
10/5/2023 12:33pm
FGR01 wrote:
I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man. This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens. This was...

I was really hoping we wouldn't start dissecting and debating to respect the fallen man.

This was not an interaction between 2 private citizens.

This was a law enforcement encounter between a Federal Agent protecting Federal restricted land and 2 private citizens trespassing upon that land without authorization.  

While we do not know all the facts, we do know that much and we do know that 2 private citizens became engaged in a physical fight with a federal law enforcement official who was legally protecting federal land when he apparently contacted them about their illegal trespassing upon that federal land.  Draw your own conclusions from there, but logic dictates that when you are caught trespassing by a federal agent on restricted land you probably should not contest and get into a fight with that federal agent.

GPrider wrote:
agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because...

agreed, federal land will be protected by a federal officer, not a rent a cop. We have nearby trails where I grew up riding on. Because it was on federal land, Miramar navel base stated patrolling it and arresting us all, and not with a smile. Getting thrown in the brig and pushed around. Running from them was not an option. I am guessing getting into a physical confrontation would possibly also end badly. Those guys don't fuck around. Just sayin

Federal government uses contractors for security all the time. 

not disagreeing with you, but, the protocols are different. Federal laws apply while on duty on their watch. 

10/5/2023 12:36pm Edited Date/Time 10/5/2023 1:35pm

Quit talking like this" child" was 5 years old. Must have been big enough and old enough to throw down.

9
1
mxb2
Posts
22437
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD US
10/5/2023 12:41pm
lostboy819 wrote:

Quit talking like this" child" was 5 years old. Must have been big enough and old enough to throw down.

Naw man its the cool.thing now to confront people instead of making stuff simple. Knowing you are already wrong.  

2
2
toroP
Posts
4450
Joined
4/6/2009
Location
Cincinnati, OH US
10/5/2023 12:47pm

Vital has a bunch of crime scene investigators, none of which have access to the crime scene, and have almost no facts regarding the case.

19
dsc131
Posts
477
Joined
8/4/2021
Location
Temecula, WY US
Fantasy
10/5/2023 12:59pm

It's funny how some of the footage shows gates and razorwire, but also this shot which looks pretty open to me.

You can see the little trail they have laid out...probably tracks from the last lap the guy and his son did.

How many of us have ridden for God knows how long in a place like this???

powerlineride

9
1
mx317
Posts
5281
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
TN US
10/5/2023 1:01pm

From the picture of the son riding, he appears to be at least a teenager. I hate this happened to a fellow rider, but two on one isn't cool either.  RIP

Coach529
Posts
396
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Coeur d'Alene, ID US
10/5/2023 1:23pm

The incident happened in a parking lot. The guard pulled them over and the incident occured. The bike was in the truck, not sure if they just got done riding.

Son is 18.

7

Post a reply to: Washington Rider Shot and Killed

The Latest