Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
1) 15K is too much for a motocross bike? Well, apparently, 10,000 people disagree with you on that, as that's how many orders Stark now has for the Varg. Wait, make that 10,000 and one. A friend of mine ordered his yesterday.
2) It takes 200 acres and costs millions of dollars to open a motocross track? Where? Monaco?
3) I can't have 30 of my friends over for a Ride Day? Why? Is there some new totalitarian government in power now? Because I had around 30 of them over last year, and the year before that, and the year before that - and that was with me having the only electric bike. With so many of my buds now getting electric bikes next year, hell, I'm thinking maybe twice that can come over and ride. I guess the Stasi had better get their handcuffs and dobermans ready - we will not be sent off to the Gulag without a fight.
I could go on (and on and on and on and on and on), but the thing about a dude like this is, he's got all the time in the world to be as wrong as a rainstorm during monsoon season, and I just don't.
The future of the sport of motocross is bright, my friends, but not for anyone who lets some bitter, jaded, angry, sarcastic, antagonistic, naysayer convince them that everything sucks and the future is gonna suck even worse. To anyone young who reads these threads, let me say this: pick wisely who you let bend your ear and direct your inner voice, for if that inner voice becomes dark and narrow-minded, one day you'll be too old and tired to overcome it.
If you think about it, why wouldn’t the Stark be the faster bike? Weight, weight distribution, suspension, max. power, tires and brakes are the same, whereas the power is more controllable and no time is wasted shifting. The only uncertainties are the chassis flex and geometry and it seems like they nailed that.
Before the media event and at a different track a young guy broke the track record by 3 seconds on a Varg (lap time just under 2 minutes). He normally rides 125 2T. It would be interesting to do a real analysis but my guess is that guys who are used 2T adapt to the Varg very quickly. They are good at carrying speed through corners but also have 450 power available -- therefore the faster time.
You could also see in the videos how round they could do the turns on the Stark. If that makes any sense..
Just get a Surron for the fraction of the price. My neighbor has one and it's a blast, can ride it over to the gas station lol.
1. Torque to pull you through
2. Enough gear to not top out before reaching the end of the set (which is why guys will start them in 4th gear)
Electric will give you all the torque you want, plus it just keeps driving forward without any worry of topping out. I’ve also found it to be a lot easier to time jumps on electric, but that’s not everyone’s experience.
Pit Row
Here some rough calculations for the internal gearing: If the Varg is geared for 130 km/h or 80 mph or 36 m/s top speed with a rear wheel circumference of about 2 m, the rear wheel needs to spin with ~1000 rpm. The electric motor has a max rpm of 14000. Assuming a standard 13:50 outside gearing means that the internal gearing has to be about 1:3.5, which would be possible with just one set of gears. This would also mean that the motor of the Varg spins backwards, which would counteract wheelies while acceleration and so on. The inertia of the electric motor is of course less than that of a crank, but still there.
A lot of MotoGP bikes have backwards spinning cranks, but has any manufacturers ever tried that on an MX bike?
Please check the math. I’m already five beers in..
Unless they specialize in REM and older two strokes only?
I'm just expecting relevant journalism, that's all. I guess it might need an extra tooth on the rear sprocket?
EDIT: sorry, you said circumference. I was thinking diameter. Probably more like 2.5m circumference in that case. Now I want to go measure my wheel diameter...
Close...
Screen grab from media reviews shows 51km/h at 5,125rpm
Website advertises maximum motor speed of 14,200rpm, so top speed of 141km/h or 87mpg.
19" rear wheel has 2.168m circumference.
5125 * 2.168 * 60 / (51 * 1000) = 13.07 total reduction.
Photos of bike show 13 front sprocket and 49 tooth rear sprocket, so 3.77 final drive reduction.
13.07 / 3.77 = 3.47, so 1:3.47 internal gearing.
So it seems likely that they only have one set of gears. That should in theory have a positive on handling at higher speeds because the counterrotating motor cancel out part of the forces of the wheels.
Do you have any info on the suspension? Do the different weight options mean different springs and clickers or are there also shim changes?
Being in a specific gear at a specific throttle setting helps us judge speed off jumps. Will it be difficult to judge that speed when there's less noise and only one gear?
Post a reply to: Stark Varg Reviews