What is more or seems more dangerous?

BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
MOTOGP or AMERICAN SX?
You'd think at the speeds motogp goes there would be no comparison. Very rarely do I hear about these racers getting injured. Hope forkner heals up great and soon.
|
loftyair
Posts
2901
Joined
7/3/2009
Location
riverside, CA, USA
11/15/2017 4:57pm
Being more in touch with dirt, I hear about more broken bones and such. Although I think it happens more often in street than I know of. Death though, much higher risk in street bike.
NorCal 50+
Posts
1455
Joined
5/31/2017
Location
Grass Valley, CA, USA
11/15/2017 4:58pm
When they crash, they just slide for the most part. Sissy sport. Woohoo
gsxr6
Posts
1956
Joined
9/3/2011
Location
Anderson, CA, USA
11/15/2017 5:01pm Edited Date/Time 11/15/2017 5:03pm
Lol the airbag suits they wear nowdays inflate before they hit the ground. Def helps. Suit knows that your falling before u do hehe. Will make its way to Moto when riders realize a 2000 dollar suit is still cheaper than broken bones.
305FC250
Posts
428
Joined
9/18/2016
Location
Miami, FL, USA
11/15/2017 5:05pm
Like you said, I hear about serious injuries way less often in the road racing world. I would have to say SX carries a higher risk of injury.

The Shop

mauidex
Posts
2069
Joined
9/12/2011
Location
Haiku, HI, USA
11/15/2017 5:09pm
guess it all depends on the parameters of your "dangerous".............not many but racers die road racing or the potential is greater............in SX plan on getting hurt, not if when.........somehow, even dungy and the king had injuries and paralysis is very realUnsure Unsure
Motoxdoc
Posts
2710
Joined
11/8/2009
Location
Steamboat Springs, CO, USA
11/15/2017 5:39pm
BobbyM wrote:
MOTOGP or AMERICAN SX? You'd think at the speeds motogp goes there would be no comparison. Very rarely do I hear about these racers getting injured...
MOTOGP or AMERICAN SX?
You'd think at the speeds motogp goes there would be no comparison. Very rarely do I hear about these racers getting injured. Hope forkner heals up great and soon.
IMO...Supercross is more dangerous. Think about doing each discipline on the novice/entry level. In motoGP you can slowly work up to speed, learning as you go. In supercross you either do the obstacle or you don't; you can't slowly work up to it in increments. Also, the danger in SX can change each lap. MotoGP is fairly consistent throughout the race....unless you have an oil spill or something out of the ordinary. And if you want to talk about frequency of injuries....OMG, supercross is king! I would guess that someone leaves just about every SX race throughout the year with a severe injury. On the other hand, I'm guessing it's not uncommon to go multiple motoGP races without ANY injuries.
blusmbl
Posts
1284
Joined
3/19/2012
Location
Plymouth, MI, USA
11/15/2017 6:03pm
mauidex wrote:
guess it all depends on the parameters of your "dangerous".............not many but racers die road racing or the potential is greater............in SX plan on getting hurt...
guess it all depends on the parameters of your "dangerous".............not many but racers die road racing or the potential is greater............in SX plan on getting hurt, not if when.........somehow, even dungy and the king had injuries and paralysis is very realUnsure Unsure
x2. High profile people have died in MotoGP races. I can't think of anyone losing their life at a Supercross, and the last pro motocross death was possibly Josh Litchtle at Red Bud, from heat exhaustion. The chance of injury definitely seems higher from SX/MX, but the risk of death is higher in MotoGP.

If you start lumping in amateur races, things like the Isle of Man TT have to be included as well, which has a body count almost every year. It's pretty ridiculous.
11/15/2017 6:07pm Edited Date/Time 11/15/2017 6:07pm
blusmbl wrote:
x2. High profile people have died in MotoGP races. I can't think of anyone losing their life at a Supercross, and the last pro motocross death...
x2. High profile people have died in MotoGP races. I can't think of anyone losing their life at a Supercross, and the last pro motocross death was possibly Josh Litchtle at Red Bud, from heat exhaustion. The chance of injury definitely seems higher from SX/MX, but the risk of death is higher in MotoGP.

If you start lumping in amateur races, things like the Isle of Man TT have to be included as well, which has a body count almost every year. It's pretty ridiculous.
Jason Ciarletta SX 2004. RIP
Highsider
Posts
7679
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Way Toasty, IA, USA
11/15/2017 6:09pm
blusmbl wrote:
x2. High profile people have died in MotoGP races. I can't think of anyone losing their life at a Supercross, and the last pro motocross death...
x2. High profile people have died in MotoGP races. I can't think of anyone losing their life at a Supercross, and the last pro motocross death was possibly Josh Litchtle at Red Bud, from heat exhaustion. The chance of injury definitely seems higher from SX/MX, but the risk of death is higher in MotoGP.

If you start lumping in amateur races, things like the Isle of Man TT have to be included as well, which has a body count almost every year. It's pretty ridiculous.
things like the Isle of Man TT

You posted just as I was going to. ;-)
Johnny Depp
Posts
6435
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
11/15/2017 6:15pm
Supercross has become "Last Man Standing".

MotoMalyDad
Posts
701
Joined
4/19/2012
Location
Santa Maria, CA, USA
11/15/2017 8:40pm
blusmbl wrote:
x2. High profile people have died in MotoGP races. I can't think of anyone losing their life at a Supercross, and the last pro motocross death...
x2. High profile people have died in MotoGP races. I can't think of anyone losing their life at a Supercross, and the last pro motocross death was possibly Josh Litchtle at Red Bud, from heat exhaustion. The chance of injury definitely seems higher from SX/MX, but the risk of death is higher in MotoGP.

If you start lumping in amateur races, things like the Isle of Man TT have to be included as well, which has a body count almost every year. It's pretty ridiculous.
Highsider wrote:
things like the Isle of Man TT

You posted just as I was going to. ;-)
Drop the mic bro. Isle of Man TT = death every year
Shawn142
Posts
2602
Joined
10/27/2008
Location
Burleson, TX, USA
11/15/2017 8:45pm
MotoGP and its supporting categories have had 4 deaths in the 2000s. While SX is more likely to result in injury, MotoGP is more likely to result in fatality. Most crashes are low-slides but everything is at much higher speed. So it depends on your definition of dangerous.
andyman
Posts
354
Joined
6/8/2013
Location
FI
11/15/2017 9:47pm
Moto gp guys dont ride moto gp between races.
sherro24
Posts
96
Joined
6/30/2011
Location
AU
11/15/2017 10:42pm Edited Date/Time 11/15/2017 10:44pm
theres not really an argument here at all. Iv crashed jumping 80ft jumps on a mx track. I can't even imagine crashing while braking at 300km heading for a 90 degree corner
sherro24
Posts
96
Joined
6/30/2011
Location
AU
11/15/2017 10:46pm
the safety in moto gp is top level, thats why these guys don't die every time they crash
Motofinne
Posts
11489
Joined
1/4/2014
Location
FI
11/16/2017 2:30am Edited Date/Time 11/16/2017 2:38am
The safety standards are really high in SBK and MotoGP. But even with the modern day tracks we've seen deaths. Simoncelli and Salom comes to mind.

Isle of Man and other racing on actual road is way, way, way more dangerous than SX or MX. Every year people die at the Isle of Man TT.

We see more broken bones in MX or SX but fatal crashes are very rare.

You're effed when things go wrong on a 600cc or 1000cc bike. The speeds in SX and MX are so much slower and the dirt is softer than asphalt. I would say that MX and SX is safer.
MotoMalyDad
Posts
701
Joined
4/19/2012
Location
Santa Maria, CA, USA
11/16/2017 7:40am
At the end of the day, what is YOUR definition of safe ? Broken bones, paralysis or death .
BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
11/16/2017 9:37am
Isle of Man type stuff is not in the mix here... Motogp vs sx. Last death in either discipline? Not sure.
Forty
Posts
3062
Joined
7/27/2009
Location
Saint Paul, MN, USA
11/16/2017 9:50am
Both are dangerous, it comes with the territory however IMO SX has less margin for error and greater opportunity for devastating injury so I think SX is a more dangerous.
Motofinne
Posts
11489
Joined
1/4/2014
Location
FI
11/16/2017 10:00am
BobbyM wrote:
Isle of Man type stuff is not in the mix here... Motogp vs sx. Last death in either discipline? Not sure.
Luis Salom 2016, Simoncelli 2011.

That's why i feel like MotoGP, SBK etc is more dangerous even though they have really high safety standards with the tracks and the rider equipment.

11/16/2017 10:10am
It's probably a lot to do with the way the energy is dissipated in the crashes. Most of the time when they crash in MotoGP they hit the ground and keep sliding, thus dissipating the speed and energy of the crash. Compare that to Ken Roczens big crash for example, where he landed abruptly on the face of a jump. All that energy has nowhere to go and results in broken bones.
ak23
Posts
300
Joined
12/18/2009
Location
All Over, MI, USA
11/16/2017 10:27am
Just thru vital alone i hear a half dozen or so kids/people dying each year doing moto at the amateur ranks - curious how amateur road racing is?
kkawboy14
Posts
11486
Joined
6/5/2015
Location
USA
11/16/2017 10:30am
Isle of Man is a moto race with an occasional cow, chicken or goat crossing the track!
Zaugg
Posts
1083
Joined
9/1/2012
Location
Not California, CA, USA
11/16/2017 11:45am
ak23 wrote:
Just thru vital alone i hear a half dozen or so kids/people dying each year doing moto at the amateur ranks - curious how amateur road...
Just thru vital alone i hear a half dozen or so kids/people dying each year doing moto at the amateur ranks - curious how amateur road racing is?
I think in regional road racing, the risk of death is high (like at the highest level of the sport) but serious injuries are relatively low due to high safety standards for tracks and equipment.

On the flip side, compare your local motorcross track compared to a racing circuit. MX tracks let ANYBODY on the track regardless of their ability or knowledge. Some tracks don't even have flaggers. It's very rare you see that in road racing because of the chances of death. Factor in the lack of standards when constructing mx tracks and the potential for injury is much higher.

I'd rather go 100+ mph on a road race circuit or supermoto track than race or ride at 25 mph on a poorly constructed and poorly prepped mx track.

If dangerous = minor to serious injury (SX is more dangerous)
If dangerous = death (MotoGP)
Shawn142
Posts
2602
Joined
10/27/2008
Location
Burleson, TX, USA
11/17/2017 6:21am
BobbyM wrote:
Isle of Man type stuff is not in the mix here... Motogp vs sx. Last death in either discipline? Not sure.
Motofinne wrote:
Luis Salom 2016, Simoncelli 2011. That's why i feel like MotoGP, SBK etc is more dangerous even though they have really high safety standards with the...
Luis Salom 2016, Simoncelli 2011.

That's why i feel like MotoGP, SBK etc is more dangerous even though they have really high safety standards with the tracks and the rider equipment.

Shoya Tomizawa had also died in an on-track incident in 2010 in the Moto2 support class. Before that it was Kato who died at Suzuka in 2004ish, right at the beginning of the 4-stroke era.
11/17/2017 6:44am
Shawn142 wrote:
Shoya Tomizawa had also died in an on-track incident in 2010 in the Moto2 support class. Before that it was Kato who died at Suzuka in...
Shoya Tomizawa had also died in an on-track incident in 2010 in the Moto2 support class. Before that it was Kato who died at Suzuka in 2004ish, right at the beginning of the 4-stroke era.
Kato died in 2003, I remember the incident like it was yesterday. He's bike swerved left into the wall just before the chicane at about 120mph. He died 2 weeks later but he was basically dead at the scene. The marshals just dumped him onto the stretcher & you could see his head roll to one side. I still believe he couldn't been Japan's first big bike WC.

Andrea Antonelli was killed in a WSS race in Russia, 2013.
Bearuno
Posts
5401
Joined
6/28/2014
Location
AU
11/17/2017 7:20am
Life is dangerous.

And racing - any type - makes things more dangerous.

At the final round of AFT last year (2016), 2 died - a young lady and a young man. I've no idea of when there last was a fatality at an AFT National round, but 2 in one weekend was terrible.
philG
Posts
10990
Joined
5/12/2012
Location
GB
11/17/2017 7:48am
andyman wrote:
Moto gp guys dont ride moto gp between races.
No, but they do ride MX, Flat track and Supermoto... and they do crash and they do get hurt.

11/17/2017 7:50am
Having raced MX and Road racing and being injured doing both I feel the rate of being injured is higher in SX. Majority of my injuries were on a MX bike but the likely hood of a life ending injury is higher road racing

I have had 2 friends die road racing, both at Daytona and we've had a few die during club races in FL. I became a Quadriplegic from a road racing crash in 05, I high sided at 35 mph on a warm up lap.

A few MotoGP guys were injured while training on MX bikes this season between races

Post a reply to: What is more or seems more dangerous?

The Latest