'Struggling with bike setup all weekend' can no longer be a valid excuse.

TXDirt
Posts
7784
Joined
7/29/2015
Location
Plano, TX US
8/31/2017 5:59am
aees wrote:
Sorry, but this just proof you have not ridden at the top. A few clicks can be the difference of seconds per lap. There is no...
Sorry, but this just proof you have not ridden at the top. A few clicks can be the difference of seconds per lap. There is no way in hell, Tomac would have gotten down 1.7 from 4 without changing something on the bike allowing him to go faster. If you are not 100% on the settings but maybe 97-98% that is your 2-3sec. It all depends how you like your bike setup. If you like it to be well balanced i can ensure you that every click counts.

Those last 2% is very hard to dial in, in practice mode, on a practice groomed track with few other riders pushing the pace.

Look at Tomac coming into this years Supercross. He left the bike, did not touch the settings or setup from Monstercup to A1 because he felt the bike was good, to then find out he was off. Took a few rounds to fix it but then he was back on top. Other examples:

- Roczen 2016, completely off until he switched triple clamps and some other things
- Colt Nichols (changed to Ferrandis setup for Ironman)

KTM has had 3 seasons to dial in the suspension. Even Dungey was struggeling in 2015 with settings.

Again, getting those last 1-2% is rarely something you are able to find on a practice track.
TXDirt wrote:
How do you define "ridden at the top"? Does holding an AMA Pro license and testing with Bones count? So a few clicks equals seconds per...
How do you define "ridden at the top"? Does holding an AMA Pro license and testing with Bones count?

So a few clicks equals seconds per lap?

That's a good joke.

I would consider triple clamps a fairly substantial change. You are mixing up minor and substantial changes but then say a few clicks equals "seconds per lap".

Sorry. That's not how it works.
aees wrote:
That is exactly how it works, you missed Ironman? Tomac was adjusting x3 in panic and shaved of 2.3 sec. I guess he did that for...
That is exactly how it works, you missed Ironman? Tomac was adjusting x3 in panic and shaved of 2.3 sec. I guess he did that for fun.

2-3 sec per lap, easilly on setup regardless if it is 1-2mm of offset, or changing clickers. AMA Pro licens says shit, i almost had a pro licens. I "worked" with top suspension tuners incl Factory ohlins boys.

Im guessing also you can just remove the pit area on the track since it makes no difference on lap times how you turn your clicks.

That just shows you have not been at the level where that makes a difference.
You couldn't be more wrong. Adjusting the clickers does not get you 2-3 seconds per lap.

Did you ever think it was possible that Tomac simply just put down a faster lap after seeing he was getting smoked by Herlings? Is that not a possibility?

See the problem is you keep looking for an answer as to why a guy had a good lap, or why a rider had a bad weekend. The majority of the time it's just because the rider wasn't feeling it and had a bad weekend. Or a rider just simply put down a better lap then he did previously. That had nothing to do with settings no matter how many times a rider blames his settings.

Changing push rods, clamps, sprockets etc would be considered substantial changes done back in the pits. Clickers are not substantial changes.

Glad you almost made it to the top. Please tell us more how you can save 2-3 seconds per lap when guys are searching to shave a tenth off.
3rdgearpinned
Posts
528
Joined
7/8/2016
Location
In the Mountains, NC US
8/31/2017 6:24am
first person I thought of when I read this was the 51 but it seems lately the 2 is doing the same. Hope the 18 model will do what the 2 wants. I like both guys.
vikingBoy
Posts
95
Joined
1/29/2016
Location
PA US
8/31/2017 7:21am
My opinion is that bike setup and confidence go hand in hand.

I was never a top rider, local hero that almost turned pro but injuries set me back. Growing up I never really paid attention to setup...didnt understand it enough. Now looking back on it, I sure wish I had, but hindsight is always 20/20.

I remember one day in Socal I was riding @ cahuilla creek and for the life of me, cold not rail this outside berm! I would hit the thing and the bike kept standing up and the bike would unsettle and I had no flow through it. Sitting in my van the dude next to me striked up a conversation. I mentioned to him the trouble I was having in that one corner, and he said that maybe I should adjust some clickers. I thought to myself that it was just me and I sucked, and I needed to work on my corners, but to humor him, I did what he mentioned. I softened up the compression by 2 clicks in the front end, went back out and HOLLLLLYYYYY SHIIIIIIT!!!!!! Dude I could rail that berm with the best of them. It was an awakening moment for me! Couldnt believe I had wasted so many years just assuming that it was my skill that sucked, and that bike setup would have no impact on my performance. Man was I wrong. Skip to ahead 7 years, and I got into road racing and worked for a European dealer as a tech. There I learned a heck of a lot about bike setup and how important it is in road racing. looking back to my MX years I can now see how important it really was, and is, to have a bike that amplifies your confidence!!!!!
aees
Posts
2644
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
8/31/2017 7:53am
TXDirt wrote:
How do you define "ridden at the top"? Does holding an AMA Pro license and testing with Bones count? So a few clicks equals seconds per...
How do you define "ridden at the top"? Does holding an AMA Pro license and testing with Bones count?

So a few clicks equals seconds per lap?

That's a good joke.

I would consider triple clamps a fairly substantial change. You are mixing up minor and substantial changes but then say a few clicks equals "seconds per lap".

Sorry. That's not how it works.
aees wrote:
That is exactly how it works, you missed Ironman? Tomac was adjusting x3 in panic and shaved of 2.3 sec. I guess he did that for...
That is exactly how it works, you missed Ironman? Tomac was adjusting x3 in panic and shaved of 2.3 sec. I guess he did that for fun.

2-3 sec per lap, easilly on setup regardless if it is 1-2mm of offset, or changing clickers. AMA Pro licens says shit, i almost had a pro licens. I "worked" with top suspension tuners incl Factory ohlins boys.

Im guessing also you can just remove the pit area on the track since it makes no difference on lap times how you turn your clicks.

That just shows you have not been at the level where that makes a difference.
TXDirt wrote:
You couldn't be more wrong. Adjusting the clickers does not get you 2-3 seconds per lap. Did you ever think it was possible that Tomac simply...
You couldn't be more wrong. Adjusting the clickers does not get you 2-3 seconds per lap.

Did you ever think it was possible that Tomac simply just put down a faster lap after seeing he was getting smoked by Herlings? Is that not a possibility?

See the problem is you keep looking for an answer as to why a guy had a good lap, or why a rider had a bad weekend. The majority of the time it's just because the rider wasn't feeling it and had a bad weekend. Or a rider just simply put down a better lap then he did previously. That had nothing to do with settings no matter how many times a rider blames his settings.

Changing push rods, clamps, sprockets etc would be considered substantial changes done back in the pits. Clickers are not substantial changes.

Glad you almost made it to the top. Please tell us more how you can save 2-3 seconds per lap when guys are searching to shave a tenth off.
So why does anyone ever go into and adjust clickers unless it helps with going faster? And number of times Dungey had these issues 2015 where he lost 2sec a lap to second motor because they went in the wrong direction. Spare me it is all in his head please and to get comfortable on the bike.

Tomac shaved off 2.7 sec, after stopping in 3 times adjusting fork clickers and getting it done on final lap in practice.

I guess next time he should just save the time dropping into the pit and "go faster"...

I know myself, set the static sag 2-3mm wrong and that is 5sec a lap because bike behaves as shit and that you can feel when you try to up the speed.

So on a 2min 15sec lap time, affecting 2-3sec per lap is not a problem. That is 1/10 sec per corner because the bike is to low or to high in front, or stick in the ruts to much. 1 click on the CONE Valve or ohlins forks turn into a few mm of ride height.

The Shop

philG
Posts
10852
Joined
5/12/2012
Location
GB
8/31/2017 8:03am
I guess that's what you get for a stupid 1 day format with 2 15 minute sessions.

An hour of free practice on a Friday afternoon instead of everyone sitting with their thumbs up their arses might help.
-MAVERICK-
Posts
65244
Joined
3/26/2015
Location
Ontario CA
8/31/2017 8:28am
Wouldn't it make it a bit pointless having post race interviews?
Aren't they already pointless when no matter the questions asked the follow up answer is usually along the lines of the following:

Yeah. No. Monster Energy Pro Circuit Kawasaki, Dunlop tires hooking up great, Fox, Scott, Bell.....
8/31/2017 8:33am
Wouldn't it make it a bit pointless having post race interviews?
-MAVERICK- wrote:
Aren't they already pointless when no matter the questions asked the follow up answer is usually along the lines of the following: Yeah. No. Monster Energy...
Aren't they already pointless when no matter the questions asked the follow up answer is usually along the lines of the following:

Yeah. No. Monster Energy Pro Circuit Kawasaki, Dunlop tires hooking up great, Fox, Scott, Bell.....
"I struggled a bit with my start in that second moto... My Dunlop tires helped me to get off to a great start..."
Signed Aaron Plessinger
LittleDragon
Posts
154
Joined
6/25/2014
Location
Sacramento, CA US
8/31/2017 8:46am
Eric Kehoe killed this excuse back in the 90's
cali11
Posts
1545
Joined
2/28/2016
Location
Federal Way, WA US
8/31/2017 8:49am
You could not of posted this, in one of the other 20 threads?
-MAVERICK-
Posts
65244
Joined
3/26/2015
Location
Ontario CA
8/31/2017 10:13am Edited Date/Time 8/31/2017 10:14am
Wouldn't it make it a bit pointless having post race interviews?
-MAVERICK- wrote:
Aren't they already pointless when no matter the questions asked the follow up answer is usually along the lines of the following: Yeah. No. Monster Energy...
Aren't they already pointless when no matter the questions asked the follow up answer is usually along the lines of the following:

Yeah. No. Monster Energy Pro Circuit Kawasaki, Dunlop tires hooking up great, Fox, Scott, Bell.....
crusty_xx wrote:
"I struggled a bit with my start in that second moto... My Dunlop tires helped me to get off to a great start..."
Signed Aaron Plessinger
LOL when was that? I don't recall hearing that one.
8/31/2017 10:14am
Why wouldn't they struggle with set up when they test on the same goat trail everyday?
8/31/2017 10:28am
I don't think the OP, who I agree with, was saying that bike setup doesn't matter. The question is whether or not it is a valid excuse. At their level, they have access to any parts and settings they desire so if the bike isn't set up correctly, it's on them. If they let the bike setup hold them back, its on them.

Regardless, it's a bad excuse.

At the same time, I can see why our riders struggle to get comfortable outdoors. With 2 weeks before hangtown and about 2 weeks off during the season, the average US rider rides about 16 weeks of the year on "motocross" tracks. Assuming they take 2 weeks off before testing for monster cup, that leaves the rest of the year, or about 34 weeks, where their main focus is supercross.

They ride literally twice as much supercross as motocross, and maybe the correct setup for either is much more different than they want to admit. But then they run into the issue where making such drastic changes to the bike, even if ultimately it would have a faster potential, feels so foreign to them with such little amount of time to adjust, that they can go faster on a stiffer bike they are more comfortable on than a softer bike with a higher potential but that makes them uncomfortable.

I only expect this to get worse before it gets better with more and more focus going towards supercross (22 race series anyone?)
Falcon
Posts
12191
Joined
11/16/2011
Location
Menifee, CA US
8/31/2017 10:37am
JMB used to set it and forget it. ALL SEASON!
8/31/2017 11:00am
I just don't get how they can't find a set-up for multiple months when they are on a factory team, have a pool of mechanics and suspension experts around them and the ability to test and train multiple hours per week. If they can't find it, how could privateers or weekend warriors ever?

Just an example: after Ironman, Nicholls said his first few rounds were good, then he had a few bad ones because of his bike set-up. Maybe I'm clueless but why didn't they go back to what was comfortable earlier? Does it really take a few races to find a good set-up, even after you already had a good one? I don't buy it. (no hate on the guy on anything just an example that came to mind)
aeffertz
Posts
12375
Joined
7/16/2015
Location
La Crosse, WI US
8/31/2017 12:20pm
HenryA wrote:
The best part is the riders that has been on the same bike for 2-3 years and all of sudden is struggling with bike setup.:huh: Feels...
The best part is the riders that has been on the same bike for 2-3 years and all of sudden is struggling with bike setup.Huh

Feels more like "I was moody the last 3 races and didn't give it my all because of X"
That was my main point. This isn't a 'Herlings is the best, America Sucks' thread.

Dudes on the same factory bike, year after year, with unlimited budget and unlimited sources still can't get comfortable on the bike? Just bizarre. Head cases, all of them. Grinning

I'm not saying bike setup isn't important, of course it is. Struggling with bike setup all year doesn't make sense at the professional level. Either the teams aren't doing their job or the rider is just struggling with conditions and someone was better than them. Which seems more likely?
Prejump
Posts
221
Joined
8/4/2017
Location
GB
8/31/2017 12:35pm
aeffertz wrote:
That was my main point. This isn't a 'Herlings is the best, America Sucks' thread. Dudes on the same factory bike, year after year, with unlimited...
That was my main point. This isn't a 'Herlings is the best, America Sucks' thread.

Dudes on the same factory bike, year after year, with unlimited budget and unlimited sources still can't get comfortable on the bike? Just bizarre. Head cases, all of them. Grinning

I'm not saying bike setup isn't important, of course it is. Struggling with bike setup all year doesn't make sense at the professional level. Either the teams aren't doing their job or the rider is just struggling with conditions and someone was better than them. Which seems more likely?
Without doubt its simply the riders hitting the limit of their talent for the conditions.

Their setups wont be a mile off. Im sure sag & springs are all set to rider weight. They would have done a ton of testing for set ups. You will never be able to set a bike up for every section of a track. Riders like Herlings know how to read terrain, it's a world class technique.

I expect many riders rider better after a few clicks but that doesnt prove it was the clicks, we can all work things things out, get more confident, better line developed etc

Through my racing years I set up & got on with it for the season.
8/31/2017 12:44pm
Man it's so hard to know whether setup is really an excuse or not. I mean on one hand you have situations like TXDirt mentioned where...
Man it's so hard to know whether setup is really an excuse or not. I mean on one hand you have situations like TXDirt mentioned where the tuner tells the rider he made a change when he really didn't and it's apparently better. But on the other hand you have situations like Chad Reed who can ride with the best of them when he's comfortable on his bike, but when he's not he's just a top 10 guy. There's also Tomac in SX who couldn't get out of his own way the first three rounds and then makes some changes and goes on a tear. I guess you can chock that up to being mental, I'm not sure but I kind of think if they aren't mentally comfortable with their setup some changes should be made.
Chad had RC and JS as his main rivals he flat out could not beat them of course he whined about the bike. Tomac what happened...
Chad had RC and JS as his main rivals he flat out could not beat them of course he whined about the bike.

Tomac what happened during round 3? Someone got hurt and Tomac magically looked like a new human from there on I wonder why?
What about this very same someone you mention, just a year and a half ago who started winning because they got the setup the way he wanted?

And if you actually think that's why Tomac started winning I think you need to take your own advice and drink more water and less alcohol.
aees
Posts
2644
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
8/31/2017 1:48pm
TriRacer27 wrote:
I don't think the OP, who I agree with, was saying that bike setup doesn't matter. The question is whether or not it is a valid...
I don't think the OP, who I agree with, was saying that bike setup doesn't matter. The question is whether or not it is a valid excuse. At their level, they have access to any parts and settings they desire so if the bike isn't set up correctly, it's on them. If they let the bike setup hold them back, its on them.

Regardless, it's a bad excuse.

At the same time, I can see why our riders struggle to get comfortable outdoors. With 2 weeks before hangtown and about 2 weeks off during the season, the average US rider rides about 16 weeks of the year on "motocross" tracks. Assuming they take 2 weeks off before testing for monster cup, that leaves the rest of the year, or about 34 weeks, where their main focus is supercross.

They ride literally twice as much supercross as motocross, and maybe the correct setup for either is much more different than they want to admit. But then they run into the issue where making such drastic changes to the bike, even if ultimately it would have a faster potential, feels so foreign to them with such little amount of time to adjust, that they can go faster on a stiffer bike they are more comfortable on than a softer bike with a higher potential but that makes them uncomfortable.

I only expect this to get worse before it gets better with more and more focus going towards supercross (22 race series anyone?)
The issue is the same on every level. Practice track shape, and race shape are two completely different worlds.

They talked about this so many times, you can not find tracks in US that are beaten down to the level it reaches for a race. Neither do you get the same pace (read speed) during practice. In Europe you have less problem finding rough tracks to practice on.

How many times have you arrived at Pala, Milestone or Cauhilla and the track has been left as is for 2-3 practice days?

On Supercross the issue is that no one wants to take the risks it comes with and practice on a non-prepped supercross track.

So i fully understand they cant get that last bit out of the bike until they are in it.

Someone like Nicols however, should have no excuse. He had all season to ride Ferrandis bike to compare, and chose to do it before the last race of the year.
8/31/2017 1:49pm
-MAVERICK- wrote:
Aren't they already pointless when no matter the questions asked the follow up answer is usually along the lines of the following: Yeah. No. Monster Energy...
Aren't they already pointless when no matter the questions asked the follow up answer is usually along the lines of the following:

Yeah. No. Monster Energy Pro Circuit Kawasaki, Dunlop tires hooking up great, Fox, Scott, Bell.....
crusty_xx wrote:
"I struggled a bit with my start in that second moto... My Dunlop tires helped me to get off to a great start..."
Signed Aaron Plessinger
-MAVERICK- wrote:
LOL when was that? I don't recall hearing that one.
I can't really remember, it was on the podium after some national last year.
Not sure if he said that about the tires or his bike but he literally said that in two consecutive sentences
BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
8/31/2017 2:10pm
aeffertz wrote:
Tired of this excuse from dudes who have been on the bike for over a year. Bro, if you can't find a setting on the factory...
Tired of this excuse from dudes who have been on the bike for over a year. Bro, if you can't find a setting on the factory bike you've been riding for multiple years, it ain't the bike.

If you do well one weekend and struggle the next on practically the same track, it ain't the bike.

If a GP dude can come over, run a completely new bike, with a different frame and tires than what he ever runs, and goes 1-1 (coming from dead last one moto) on the day... It ain't the bike.
You don't need a perfect set up... But you do need a scooter that doesn't surprise you, to ride confidently. Like a good woman, trust is essential.
Katoomey
Posts
1714
Joined
1/18/2013
Location
WY US
8/31/2017 2:44pm
Its part of your job as a pro rider to get the bike set-up to work for you. So whether its the bike or the rider, the rider is to blame.
KirkChandler
Posts
1676
Joined
7/31/2015
Location
Oceanside, CA US
8/31/2017 3:58pm Edited Date/Time 8/31/2017 6:28pm
Who's to say he wasn't actually immediately comfortable on the AMA KTM? Or that the AMA KTM is better than his GP KTM setup? Yes it could be different, but sometimes one clicks right away.

I have two 2014 KX 450s, built exactly the same (same bars/suspension/pipe/gearing/etc.), one I like and prefer to ride, the other feels foreign to me as soon as I get on the track and takes several laps to get used to. Makes no sense that one feels better than the other.

Also sometimes doing all of those frame modifications and works parts can actually be a detriment. (Kenny going back to stock clamps?) The amount of engineering and R&D dollars the production development team spends dwarfs what the race teams can spend and engineer for a few one off frames and bikes.
avidchimp
Posts
5692
Joined
7/9/2008
Location
EGL, MN US
8/31/2017 6:05pm
Who's to say he wasn't actually immediately comfortable on the AMA KTM? Or that the AMA KTM is better than his GP KTM setup? Yes it...
Who's to say he wasn't actually immediately comfortable on the AMA KTM? Or that the AMA KTM is better than his GP KTM setup? Yes it could be different, but sometimes one clicks right away.

I have two 2014 KX 450s, built exactly the same (same bars/suspension/pipe/gearing/etc.), one I like and prefer to ride, the other feels foreign to me as soon as I get on the track and takes several laps to get used to. Makes no sense that one feels better than the other.

Also sometimes doing all of those frame modifications and works parts can actually be a detriment. (Kenny going back to stock clamps?) The amount of engineering and R&D dollars the production development team spends dwarfs what the race teams can spend and engineer for a few one off frames and bikes.
And to add further to this, as DV has said, the factory/ factory supported riders NEVER start with a true stock bike for testing perspective. It almost always has some factory suspension/parts before they even test the bike the first time.
8/31/2017 8:18pm
Crush wrote:
I bet the bike isn't that bad/different anyways. In reality, if Dungey and Musquinn are winning on it, then whatever difference there is can't be so...
I bet the bike isn't that bad/different anyways. In reality, if Dungey and Musquinn are winning on it, then whatever difference there is can't be so huge that it's a turd compared to his bike.

His suspension setup looks way more compliant and active than any US based rider except for Kenny, that was the thing I saw and I bet that made more difference than any 1-2mm frame difference would make, especially on the great traction at Iron Man.
I have spoken to someone (close friend) and he has had Febvres settings to test and they aren't much firmer than what you can get off the showroom floor.
Sodipop
Posts
863
Joined
5/10/2016
Location
Petaluma, CA US
8/31/2017 10:43pm
Herlings is a freak talent. Just like roczen. They are basically spawn of james Stewart. A lot of people didn't want to believe how good he is but he's amazing and he showed it this past weekend. Just because he won doesn't mean his set up was ideal.
brimx153
Posts
3344
Joined
5/3/2012
Location
IE
9/1/2017 12:08am
herlings and kroc tecnique is way different , that the biggest difference , not bike set up . both of them ride so many turns with both feet on the pegs or standing up . bike set up has nothing to do with that . people saying his softer set up make him hook up out of turn s is the big difference . i disagree its the fact he doesnt brake as hard carries his costing speed so much , then u dont need to hit the gas hard cause which equals no wheel spin . its the new tecnique of riding where the mxgp guys are exceling at the mo .
aees
Posts
2644
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
9/1/2017 1:52am
brimx153 wrote:
herlings and kroc tecnique is way different , that the biggest difference , not bike set up . both of them ride so many turns with...
herlings and kroc tecnique is way different , that the biggest difference , not bike set up . both of them ride so many turns with both feet on the pegs or standing up . bike set up has nothing to do with that . people saying his softer set up make him hook up out of turn s is the big difference . i disagree its the fact he doesnt brake as hard carries his costing speed so much , then u dont need to hit the gas hard cause which equals no wheel spin . its the new tecnique of riding where the mxgp guys are exceling at the mo .
Yes, but if you dont brake hard you neither need to have stiff forks. Braking hard puts load on the forks making them dive.

markit
Posts
2641
Joined
1/10/2013
Location
Bogalusa, LA US
9/1/2017 5:45am
PRM31 wrote:
Maybe Pirellis are really superior?!
They are.
aees
Posts
2644
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
US
9/4/2017 1:28pm
TXDirt wrote:
How do you define "ridden at the top"? Does holding an AMA Pro license and testing with Bones count? So a few clicks equals seconds per...
How do you define "ridden at the top"? Does holding an AMA Pro license and testing with Bones count?

So a few clicks equals seconds per lap?

That's a good joke.

I would consider triple clamps a fairly substantial change. You are mixing up minor and substantial changes but then say a few clicks equals "seconds per lap".

Sorry. That's not how it works.
aees wrote:
That is exactly how it works, you missed Ironman? Tomac was adjusting x3 in panic and shaved of 2.3 sec. I guess he did that for...
That is exactly how it works, you missed Ironman? Tomac was adjusting x3 in panic and shaved of 2.3 sec. I guess he did that for fun.

2-3 sec per lap, easilly on setup regardless if it is 1-2mm of offset, or changing clickers. AMA Pro licens says shit, i almost had a pro licens. I "worked" with top suspension tuners incl Factory ohlins boys.

Im guessing also you can just remove the pit area on the track since it makes no difference on lap times how you turn your clicks.

That just shows you have not been at the level where that makes a difference.
TXDirt wrote:
You couldn't be more wrong. Adjusting the clickers does not get you 2-3 seconds per lap. Did you ever think it was possible that Tomac simply...
You couldn't be more wrong. Adjusting the clickers does not get you 2-3 seconds per lap.

Did you ever think it was possible that Tomac simply just put down a faster lap after seeing he was getting smoked by Herlings? Is that not a possibility?

See the problem is you keep looking for an answer as to why a guy had a good lap, or why a rider had a bad weekend. The majority of the time it's just because the rider wasn't feeling it and had a bad weekend. Or a rider just simply put down a better lap then he did previously. That had nothing to do with settings no matter how many times a rider blames his settings.

Changing push rods, clamps, sprockets etc would be considered substantial changes done back in the pits. Clickers are not substantial changes.

Glad you almost made it to the top. Please tell us more how you can save 2-3 seconds per lap when guys are searching to shave a tenth off.
Really interesting Tomac changed a few settings on suspension at WW and went from 10-13 guy and a few seconds off, to suddenly being at the top.

Setup does not mean that much... Wink
9/4/2017 1:56pm
TriRacer27 wrote:
It's never really been a very valid excuse to begin with.

It's just been an excuse.
X100

Post a reply to: 'Struggling with bike setup all weekend' can no longer be a valid excuse.

The Latest