JS7 @ RedBud?

davistld01
Posts
9314
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Springfield, MO, USA
Edited Date/Time 7/3/2014 11:23am
I may be late on this...but has Stewart been cleared to ride this weekend at RedBud? In the Yoshimura video after Muddy Creek he kept saying he "hoped" he'd be racing next (this) weekend.
|
Olson
Posts
4605
Joined
4/14/2012
Location
SE
7/2/2014 1:00pm
He should be cleared as long as USADA/WADA says anything different, the june 30th is only FIM.
davistld01
Posts
9314
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Springfield, MO, USA
7/2/2014 1:06pm
Olson wrote:
He should be cleared as long as USADA/WADA says anything different, the june 30th is only FIM.
That makes sense.
kongols
Posts
24228
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga, LV
7/2/2014 1:09pm
Olson wrote:
He should be cleared as long as USADA/WADA says anything different, the june 30th is only FIM.
What about June 30th?
kongols
Posts
24228
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga, LV
7/2/2014 1:11pm
Olson wrote:
He should be cleared as long as USADA/WADA says anything different, the june 30th is only FIM.
What is about June 30th you keep on talking about??

The Shop

Mikkis
Posts
380
Joined
1/8/2014
Location
FI
7/2/2014 1:14pm
Olson wrote:
He should be cleared as long as USADA/WADA says anything different, the june 30th is only FIM.
kongols wrote:
What is about June 30th you keep on talking about??
Calm down Huh
Olson
Posts
4605
Joined
4/14/2012
Location
SE
7/2/2014 1:16pm
Olson wrote:
He should be cleared as long as USADA/WADA says anything different, the june 30th is only FIM.
kongols wrote:
What about June 30th?
"Mr James Stewart is provisionally suspended with effect from 20 June until further notice." -FIM

It was later talked about the date being June 30th, which I can't confirm. What matters is as long as it's just a provisional suspension it won't affect competition outside of FIM.
kongols
Posts
24228
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga, LV
7/2/2014 1:17pm
Olson wrote:
He should be cleared as long as USADA/WADA says anything different, the june 30th is only FIM.
kongols wrote:
What about June 30th?
Olson wrote:
[i]"Mr James Stewart is provisionally suspended with effect from 20 June until further notice."[/i] -FIM It was later talked about the date being June 30th, which...
"Mr James Stewart is provisionally suspended with effect from 20 June until further notice." -FIM

It was later talked about the date being June 30th, which I can't confirm. What matters is as long as it's just a provisional suspension it won't affect competition outside of FIM.
Where it was talked about?
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
7/2/2014 1:18pm
Olson wrote:
[i]"Mr James Stewart is provisionally suspended with effect from 20 June until further notice."[/i] -FIM It was later talked about the date being June 30th, which...
"Mr James Stewart is provisionally suspended with effect from 20 June until further notice." -FIM

It was later talked about the date being June 30th, which I can't confirm. What matters is as long as it's just a provisional suspension it won't affect competition outside of FIM.
That suspension has no bearing on him racing the nationals. That was discussed on the show this weekend.

The deciding factor will be what happens at his provisional hearing, which I have not seen a date for as of yet.
Olson
Posts
4605
Joined
4/14/2012
Location
SE
7/2/2014 1:19pm
kongols wrote:
What is about June 30th you keep on talking about??
Really? I can't be away from this post for 5min without you freaking out?
Olson
Posts
4605
Joined
4/14/2012
Location
SE
7/2/2014 1:21pm
IceMan446 wrote:
That suspension has no bearing on him racing the nationals. That was discussed on the show this weekend. The deciding factor will be what happens at...
That suspension has no bearing on him racing the nationals. That was discussed on the show this weekend.

The deciding factor will be what happens at his provisional hearing, which I have not seen a date for as of yet.
That's what I said? HE IS CLEARED TO RACE AS LONG AS AN AUTHORITY SAYS ANYTHING DIFFERENT!

If something where to be said, we would know.
kongols
Posts
24228
Joined
9/22/2009
Location
Riga, LV
7/2/2014 1:22pm
kongols wrote:
What is about June 30th you keep on talking about??
Olson wrote:
Really? I can't be away from this post for 5min without you freaking out?
I wanted to edit my first post but instead wrote another. If it helps you I can delete one of them.
Olson
Posts
4605
Joined
4/14/2012
Location
SE
7/2/2014 1:23pm
kongols wrote:
I wanted to edit my first post but instead wrote another. If it helps you I can delete one of them.
It's cool. Cool
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
7/2/2014 1:42pm
Olson wrote:
That's what I said? [u][b]HE IS CLEARED TO RACE AS LONG AS AN AUTHORITY SAYS ANYTHING DIFFERENT! [/b][/u] If something where to be said, we would...
That's what I said? HE IS CLEARED TO RACE AS LONG AS AN AUTHORITY SAYS ANYTHING DIFFERENT!

If something where to be said, we would know.
Ok, so next time, leave the June 30th date out of your response, as it has zero effect on him racing.

Until the hearing is done, he will be there.
rcm406
Posts
3639
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
7/2/2014 1:46pm
davistld01 wrote:
I may be late on this...but has Stewart been cleared to ride this weekend at RedBud? In the Yoshimura video after Muddy Creek he kept saying...
I may be late on this...but has Stewart been cleared to ride this weekend at RedBud? In the Yoshimura video after Muddy Creek he kept saying he "hoped" he'd be racing next (this) weekend.
Or unless the results come back from Thunder Valley and they're positive, then he has a whole new set of problems!
davistld01
Posts
9314
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Springfield, MO, USA
7/2/2014 3:10pm Edited Date/Time 7/2/2014 3:13pm
I said it made sense thinking I'd missed something away from the board & the 30th and the FIM had some connection. They don't.

The answer to my question seems to be that the FIM has no connection to the Outdoor Nationals, and unless the authorities decide to stop him & until the hearing is over, he's still good to go. No new news.

Wonder why James was questioning whether he'd be able to race?
Olson
Posts
4605
Joined
4/14/2012
Location
SE
7/2/2014 3:20pm
davistld01 wrote:
I said it made sense thinking I'd missed something away from the board & the 30th and the FIM had some connection. They don't. The answer...
I said it made sense thinking I'd missed something away from the board & the 30th and the FIM had some connection. They don't.

The answer to my question seems to be that the FIM has no connection to the Outdoor Nationals, and unless the authorities decide to stop him & until the hearing is over, he's still good to go. No new news.

Wonder why James was questioning whether he'd be able to race?
IceMan446
Posts
4676
Joined
1/10/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
7/2/2014 4:01pm
davistld01 wrote:
I said it made sense thinking I'd missed something away from the board & the 30th and the FIM had some connection. They don't. The answer...
I said it made sense thinking I'd missed something away from the board & the 30th and the FIM had some connection. They don't.

The answer to my question seems to be that the FIM has no connection to the Outdoor Nationals, and unless the authorities decide to stop him & until the hearing is over, he's still good to go. No new news.

Wonder why James was questioning whether he'd be able to race?
Maybe he knows the hearing is this week sometime?

davistld01
Posts
9314
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Springfield, MO, USA
7/2/2014 5:03pm
davistld01 wrote:
I said it made sense thinking I'd missed something away from the board & the 30th and the FIM had some connection. They don't. The answer...
I said it made sense thinking I'd missed something away from the board & the 30th and the FIM had some connection. They don't.

The answer to my question seems to be that the FIM has no connection to the Outdoor Nationals, and unless the authorities decide to stop him & until the hearing is over, he's still good to go. No new news.

Wonder why James was questioning whether he'd be able to race?
Olson wrote:
Gave me a headache...but yeah, good read.
rcm406
Posts
3639
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
7/2/2014 5:12pm
davistld01 wrote:
I said it made sense thinking I'd missed something away from the board & the 30th and the FIM had some connection. They don't. The answer...
I said it made sense thinking I'd missed something away from the board & the 30th and the FIM had some connection. They don't.

The answer to my question seems to be that the FIM has no connection to the Outdoor Nationals, and unless the authorities decide to stop him & until the hearing is over, he's still good to go. No new news.

Wonder why James was questioning whether he'd be able to race?
IceMan446 wrote:
Maybe he knows the hearing is this week sometime?

or knows the Thunder Valley results are about to be in.
7/2/2014 6:16pm
One of the AMA officials was interviewed before Muddy Creek. It was pretty clear what their position was:
#1: As long as the FIM suspension is provisional, AMA/MX Sports will take no action.
#2: The AMA has an association with FIM/WADA, but it is not a signatory member, etc.
#3: Only when a final sanction is made, and the suspension is no longer provisional, will they consider action. Even then, they have discretion in how they will respond.

Translated: We are not banning James unless we have to.
slipdog
Posts
10054
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Nor Cal, CA, USA
7/2/2014 6:25pm
One of the AMA officials was interviewed before Muddy Creek. It was pretty clear what their position was: #1: As long as the FIM suspension is...
One of the AMA officials was interviewed before Muddy Creek. It was pretty clear what their position was:
#1: As long as the FIM suspension is provisional, AMA/MX Sports will take no action.
#2: The AMA has an association with FIM/WADA, but it is not a signatory member, etc.
#3: Only when a final sanction is made, and the suspension is no longer provisional, will they consider action. Even then, they have discretion in how they will respond.

Translated: We are not banning James unless we have to.
That's what I got from the interview as well.
jeffro503
Posts
27646
Joined
7/22/2007
Location
St Helens, OR, USA
7/2/2014 8:06pm
One of the AMA officials was interviewed before Muddy Creek. It was pretty clear what their position was: #1: As long as the FIM suspension is...
One of the AMA officials was interviewed before Muddy Creek. It was pretty clear what their position was:
#1: As long as the FIM suspension is provisional, AMA/MX Sports will take no action.
#2: The AMA has an association with FIM/WADA, but it is not a signatory member, etc.
#3: Only when a final sanction is made, and the suspension is no longer provisional, will they consider action. Even then, they have discretion in how they will respond.

Translated: We are not banning James unless we have to.
slipdog wrote:
That's what I got from the interview as well.
" I think "....and I may be totally wrong on this.....BUT , what the FIM and WADA may do........is if James keeps racing , it's like sticking up the big middle finger to the both of them. And from what FTE said in one of his posts is......." They could make him wish he didn't ".

As in.......if he keeps racing the nationals....it may very well reflect on his future SX series. Like full penalty type stuff. Which is something like 2 friggin' years!

IF that happens.......I just don't see James switching to outdoors , US nationals only.
MxKing809
Posts
6374
Joined
10/13/2013
Location
Big Sand Whoops, MI, USA
Fantasy
7/2/2014 8:11pm Edited Date/Time 7/2/2014 8:12pm
One of the AMA officials was interviewed before Muddy Creek. It was pretty clear what their position was: #1: As long as the FIM suspension is...
One of the AMA officials was interviewed before Muddy Creek. It was pretty clear what their position was:
#1: As long as the FIM suspension is provisional, AMA/MX Sports will take no action.
#2: The AMA has an association with FIM/WADA, but it is not a signatory member, etc.
#3: Only when a final sanction is made, and the suspension is no longer provisional, will they consider action. Even then, they have discretion in how they will respond.

Translated: We are not banning James unless we have to.
slipdog wrote:
That's what I got from the interview as well.
jeffro503 wrote:
" I think "....and I may be totally wrong on this.....BUT , what the FIM and WADA may do........is if James keeps racing , it's like...
" I think "....and I may be totally wrong on this.....BUT , what the FIM and WADA may do........is if James keeps racing , it's like sticking up the big middle finger to the both of them. And from what FTE said in one of his posts is......." They could make him wish he didn't ".

As in.......if he keeps racing the nationals....it may very well reflect on his future SX series. Like full penalty type stuff. Which is something like 2 friggin' years!

IF that happens.......I just don't see James switching to outdoors , US nationals only.
Hey Jeffro, I'm under the impression that he can race he nationals now because there hasn't been a suspension levied yet, once the FIM and WADA make a judgement however I think it applies to ALL Motocross and Supercross races. So that would keep him from doing the outdoors as well.
Paul B
Posts
25
Joined
6/1/2014
Location
Oak Creek, WI, USA
7/2/2014 8:14pm
I would say if he gets a lengthy ban, he may just retire. I'd hate to see that happen. He's always a threat to win and the racing is so much better with him in the mix.
jeffro503
Posts
27646
Joined
7/22/2007
Location
St Helens, OR, USA
7/2/2014 8:25pm
slipdog wrote:
That's what I got from the interview as well.
jeffro503 wrote:
" I think "....and I may be totally wrong on this.....BUT , what the FIM and WADA may do........is if James keeps racing , it's like...
" I think "....and I may be totally wrong on this.....BUT , what the FIM and WADA may do........is if James keeps racing , it's like sticking up the big middle finger to the both of them. And from what FTE said in one of his posts is......." They could make him wish he didn't ".

As in.......if he keeps racing the nationals....it may very well reflect on his future SX series. Like full penalty type stuff. Which is something like 2 friggin' years!

IF that happens.......I just don't see James switching to outdoors , US nationals only.
MxKing809 wrote:
Hey Jeffro, I'm under the impression that he can race he nationals now because there hasn't been a suspension levied yet, once the FIM and WADA...
Hey Jeffro, I'm under the impression that he can race he nationals now because there hasn't been a suspension levied yet, once the FIM and WADA make a judgement however I think it applies to ALL Motocross and Supercross races. So that would keep him from doing the outdoors as well.
Well.....that is a tricky situation though. DC said that ( in so many words ) that the FIM and WADA would really have to put their foot down before MX sports caved in and gave him a suspension. At least that is what I got out of it. But " If they did "....he made it sound like MX sports would bow down and follow the FIM and WADA ruling.

Who knows? I'm hoping for the best for James. But God damn it! Who the hell was it that dropped the ball on getting a TUE filed before the SX season?

THAT.....right there could be the straw that breaks the camels back! If FIM and WADA think that James is " Giving them the middle finger " in all this......they may come down on him like a ton of bricks......which WILL affect his National series!

We'll have to see how this plays out.
Mickolobe7
Posts
1076
Joined
9/5/2013
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
7/2/2014 9:02pm
jeffro503 wrote:
" I think "....and I may be totally wrong on this.....BUT , what the FIM and WADA may do........is if James keeps racing , it's like...
" I think "....and I may be totally wrong on this.....BUT , what the FIM and WADA may do........is if James keeps racing , it's like sticking up the big middle finger to the both of them. And from what FTE said in one of his posts is......." They could make him wish he didn't ".

As in.......if he keeps racing the nationals....it may very well reflect on his future SX series. Like full penalty type stuff. Which is something like 2 friggin' years!

IF that happens.......I just don't see James switching to outdoors , US nationals only.
MxKing809 wrote:
Hey Jeffro, I'm under the impression that he can race he nationals now because there hasn't been a suspension levied yet, once the FIM and WADA...
Hey Jeffro, I'm under the impression that he can race he nationals now because there hasn't been a suspension levied yet, once the FIM and WADA make a judgement however I think it applies to ALL Motocross and Supercross races. So that would keep him from doing the outdoors as well.
jeffro503 wrote:
Well.....that is a tricky situation though. DC said that ( in so many words ) that the FIM and WADA would really have to put their...
Well.....that is a tricky situation though. DC said that ( in so many words ) that the FIM and WADA would really have to put their foot down before MX sports caved in and gave him a suspension. At least that is what I got out of it. But " If they did "....he made it sound like MX sports would bow down and follow the FIM and WADA ruling.

Who knows? I'm hoping for the best for James. But God damn it! Who the hell was it that dropped the ball on getting a TUE filed before the SX season?

THAT.....right there could be the straw that breaks the camels back! If FIM and WADA think that James is " Giving them the middle finger " in all this......they may come down on him like a ton of bricks......which WILL affect his National series!

We'll have to see how this plays out.
I think this is a bunch of crap! Let the man be and race or dont!

Which I hope they just clear him already and he can move on and start killing it again!
visser62
Posts
2531
Joined
5/2/2013
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
7/2/2014 9:10pm
I don't see them "making him wish he didn't race the outdoors" just for amphetamines.
Robgvx
Posts
4085
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
7/2/2014 11:51pm
rcm406 wrote:
Or unless the results come back from Thunder Valley and they're positive, then he has a whole new set of problems!
And if they're negative he's going to need a whole new explanation for how his supercross fail was down to prescription drugs to treat a long term medical condition.
daemon616
Posts
2025
Joined
2/19/2012
Location
Euless, TX, USA
7/3/2014 2:41am
Olson
Posts
4605
Joined
4/14/2012
Location
SE
7/3/2014 4:44am
jeffro503 wrote:
" I think "....and I may be totally wrong on this.....BUT , what the FIM and WADA may do........is if James keeps racing , it's like...
" I think "....and I may be totally wrong on this.....BUT , what the FIM and WADA may do........is if James keeps racing , it's like sticking up the big middle finger to the both of them. And from what FTE said in one of his posts is......." They could make him wish he didn't ".

As in.......if he keeps racing the nationals....it may very well reflect on his future SX series. Like full penalty type stuff. Which is something like 2 friggin' years!

IF that happens.......I just don't see James switching to outdoors , US nationals only.
Nope, that is not how it works. If they did'nt want a rider to race they would not call it provisional suspension. The rules are super clear. And I honestly dont think FIM gives a shit if a riders races in another series they got nothing to do with. It's out of their jurisdiction.

Post a reply to: JS7 @ RedBud?

The Latest