Posts
1889
Joined
9/12/2010
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
Edited Date/Time
8/25/2012 8:15am
Did a little looking at relative fast laps and average lap times for a few events this year. Many have blamed the 450 power and speed for the cause of the injuries this year. Seems to me it might be more a case of the 450 class simply having bad luck than anything else. Your thoughts?

Same reason I prefer a 125/150 over a 250 2 stroke.
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Some years are just worse for injuries than others, but it really doesn't seem to discriminate against what type of bike it is.
Personally I can't think of one 450 rider that got hurt because his bike was to fast.
Canard? Nope, he crashed rolling a triple.
Reed? Nope, he crashed changing up lines and his bike stuck in the mud.
RV? Nope, he put his foot down and twisted his knee.
So who then got hurt because the bike was to fast?
Damn, Burn beat me to it.
Pit Row
when i crash my 450, it pummels the living shit out of me like it's a job.
- Such is not the case on 450's. When top pros get together battling, they slowly keep turning up the pace like a thermostat, which seems to lead to a higher rate of implosion compared to someone running a 250 wide open.
-Mike Alessi is the only person to compete in every 450 event thus far this year.
-Only three riders in the 450 class competed in all the main events.
-Personally, I wouldn't mind if the lap times slowed 2-3 seconds if it meant the superstars of the sport didn't have to spend 25-50% of the time on the injured list the past two out of three years.
Post a reply to: Injuries: Is it really the 450?