Kx500 braaaaaap porn (Video Inside)

Edited Date/Time 1/27/2012 1:26pm
For your viewing pleasure.

https://youtu.be/cC_8P_IBfZs?hd=1
|
10/6/2011 8:15am Edited Date/Time 10/6/2011 8:17am
Double Post....
10/6/2011 8:19am
Nice. That makes my palms sweaty and my forearms ache just watching. I just know my shoulders are gonna be sore tomorrow.

H
adamdf
Posts
2129
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
St. Michael BB
10/6/2011 8:22am
Very nice. That track looks excellent too, where is that?

Also, you gotta be in shape to have held on to that thing for more than one lap, that bike is a beast.
tblazier
Posts
8808
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA US
10/6/2011 8:32am
Major boner material

The Shop

BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
10/6/2011 8:36am
I'll race that kid for pinks!
AEIOU
Posts
131
Joined
2/2/2009
Location
Las Vegas, NV US
10/6/2011 8:41am
Nice. Imagine how bummed you would be if you just spent $9.000.00 or more on a new bike and someone has the nerve to scrub the next jump after passing you on a 20 year old 500?
BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
10/6/2011 8:44am
mx400bee
Posts
237
Joined
7/1/2010
Location
Kannapolis, NC US
10/6/2011 8:44am
BobbyM wrote:
I'll race that kid for pinks!
Good Luck!
BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
10/6/2011 8:46am
BobbyM wrote:
I'll race that kid for pinks!
mx400bee wrote:
Good Luck!
Don't need luck, just need him to strap his left leg to his ass
Orange724
Posts
366
Joined
12/25/2010
Location
Vancouver, WA US
10/6/2011 8:49am
Nice vid, looks like you know how to ride a 5 hundo.

Keep it in the mid, be smooth in and out of the corners, and you'll be surpirsed how fast you start moving around a track
mx400bee
Posts
237
Joined
7/1/2010
Location
Kannapolis, NC US
10/6/2011 9:09am
BobbyM wrote:
I'll race that kid for pinks!
mx400bee wrote:
Good Luck!
BobbyM wrote:
Don't need luck, just need him to strap his left leg to his ass
Damn BobbyM that`s impressive. Had I waited a couple more minutes before posting I might have said something different. But then again you probably waited to post the video to see what idiot would bite first. You still got it going on.
bigmaico
Posts
971
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Kingwood, TX US
10/6/2011 9:16am
adamdf wrote:
Very nice. That track looks excellent too, where is that? Also, you gotta be in shape to have held on to that thing for more than...
Very nice. That track looks excellent too, where is that?

Also, you gotta be in shape to have held on to that thing for more than one lap, that bike is a beast.
The track is Cycle Ranch in Floriesville,TX

About 35 miles southwest of San Antonio,TX
mxpunk
Posts
358
Joined
10/5/2011
Location
Perrineville, NJ US
10/6/2011 9:17am
cycle ranch!

cant wait to move to texas!
Robgvx
Posts
3988
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
10/6/2011 11:21am
Needs to be a gear higher on that KX IMO.
rg4
Posts
163
Joined
1/9/2011
Location
Eastern, WA US
10/6/2011 12:28pm
You do a good job riding that beast. Love the sound and the acceleration from a big bore 2-stroke.
Motodrew295
Posts
1025
Joined
5/2/2008
Location
Kennewick, WA US
10/6/2011 12:34pm
Make me wonder why they ever bothered with a 450 4 stroke.
Shawn142
Posts
2602
Joined
10/27/2008
Location
Burleson, TX US
10/6/2011 1:26pm
Make me wonder why they ever bothered with a 450 4 stroke.
Because a 4-stroke 450 is far easier to ride? It cracks me up how nostalgic people get over something like this. These things weren't even popular when they were new. The bike wasn't good and while the kid riding it is doing okay he isn't lighting the world on fire. The same kid could probably turn faster laps on a 125.

Those guys on 4-strokes getting passed probably don't feel any worse than when a fast kid on an 80 blows by them. Should they all quit and go home in shame?
Hut
Posts
10281
Joined
4/27/2010
Location
WA US
10/6/2011 1:37pm
Shawn142 wrote:
Because a 4-stroke 450 is far easier to ride? It cracks me up how nostalgic people get over something like this. These things weren't even popular...
Because a 4-stroke 450 is far easier to ride? It cracks me up how nostalgic people get over something like this. These things weren't even popular when they were new. The bike wasn't good and while the kid riding it is doing okay he isn't lighting the world on fire. The same kid could probably turn faster laps on a 125.

Those guys on 4-strokes getting passed probably don't feel any worse than when a fast kid on an 80 blows by them. Should they all quit and go home in shame?
I always liked the 500s and was sad to see them go so I am one of those people that enjoy the nostalgia. but, I'd have to agree with your comments in general.
Motodrew295
Posts
1025
Joined
5/2/2008
Location
Kennewick, WA US
10/6/2011 1:44pm
Make me wonder why they ever bothered with a 450 4 stroke.
Shawn142 wrote:
Because a 4-stroke 450 is far easier to ride? It cracks me up how nostalgic people get over something like this. These things weren't even popular...
Because a 4-stroke 450 is far easier to ride? It cracks me up how nostalgic people get over something like this. These things weren't even popular when they were new. The bike wasn't good and while the kid riding it is doing okay he isn't lighting the world on fire. The same kid could probably turn faster laps on a 125.

Those guys on 4-strokes getting passed probably don't feel any worse than when a fast kid on an 80 blows by them. Should they all quit and go home in shame?
Have you ridden a 500? I've ridden a CR500 in a modern frame and the whole time I was thinking this is pretty much a 450. A 450 isn't easier to ride like a 125 is easier to ride than a 250F. The 500 has tons of low-end and mid range providing the traction of a 450. The only thing is it signed off a little early, but all you have to do is shift.

I'm personally not nostalgic at all, for the 500s. I got into the sport after they were cut from the nationals, and by the time I could ride big bikes, there were none being produced. But after riding one with a decent set-up I couldn't help but wonder why the companies just didn't invest in modernizing their 500s, that were left unchanged for 13+ years. It would have saved them and the consumers a lot of R&D dollars. But thanks to the AMA there was no place for them in professional motocross racing so the companies abandoned an awesome motorcycle.

And that guy was cruising on that thing. I think he rode that heavy, ill suspended beast pretty damn good. I think its a stretch to say he could have turned faster times on a 125 (definitely not the same year). even a 250F... watch it with the sound off and look at the momentum hes carrying. At first I thought he was coasting a lot (no throttle) but I bet it was a chore to get that thing slowed down, and probably the reason why hes taking outsides everywhere.
ocscottie
Posts
69092
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Redding, CA US
10/6/2011 1:55pm
That was pure awesomeness! and i just made a mess all over myself Blink
Foster576
Posts
1166
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
El Paso, TX US
10/6/2011 2:08pm
Make me wonder why they ever bothered with a 450 4 stroke.
Shawn142 wrote:
Because a 4-stroke 450 is far easier to ride? It cracks me up how nostalgic people get over something like this. These things weren't even popular...
Because a 4-stroke 450 is far easier to ride? It cracks me up how nostalgic people get over something like this. These things weren't even popular when they were new. The bike wasn't good and while the kid riding it is doing okay he isn't lighting the world on fire. The same kid could probably turn faster laps on a 125.

Those guys on 4-strokes getting passed probably don't feel any worse than when a fast kid on an 80 blows by them. Should they all quit and go home in shame?
Have you ridden a 500? I've ridden a CR500 in a modern frame and the whole time I was thinking this is pretty much a 450...
Have you ridden a 500? I've ridden a CR500 in a modern frame and the whole time I was thinking this is pretty much a 450. A 450 isn't easier to ride like a 125 is easier to ride than a 250F. The 500 has tons of low-end and mid range providing the traction of a 450. The only thing is it signed off a little early, but all you have to do is shift.

I'm personally not nostalgic at all, for the 500s. I got into the sport after they were cut from the nationals, and by the time I could ride big bikes, there were none being produced. But after riding one with a decent set-up I couldn't help but wonder why the companies just didn't invest in modernizing their 500s, that were left unchanged for 13+ years. It would have saved them and the consumers a lot of R&D dollars. But thanks to the AMA there was no place for them in professional motocross racing so the companies abandoned an awesome motorcycle.

And that guy was cruising on that thing. I think he rode that heavy, ill suspended beast pretty damn good. I think its a stretch to say he could have turned faster times on a 125 (definitely not the same year). even a 250F... watch it with the sound off and look at the momentum hes carrying. At first I thought he was coasting a lot (no throttle) but I bet it was a chore to get that thing slowed down, and probably the reason why hes taking outsides everywhere.
250F is much "easier" to ride than a 125. 450 is "easier" to ride than a 250 2stroke or a 500 2stroke. By saying "easier" most people mean more forgiving. No need to be in the perfect gear the torque of the 4stroke will just pull right on out. 500 have plenty of torque but the hard hit when you hit the power band is what made them harder to ride than 450s. The 450s just pull evenly pretty much all the way thru where the 500 pulls out of the corner even if your in too high of a gear but when it gets near that powerband you better be holdin on cause that thing will rip right out from you if your not ready for it. (seen it happen to a few people and its hilarious!) 500's had alot more people scared riding them than enjoying riding them. Things ripped!

Traction on any 2 stroke 125 250 500 whatever it may be will never be nearly as good as traction on a 4 stroke due to the 2 stroke firing every stroke up and the fourstroke has that little extra delay between fires.

4 strokes in general are just more forgiving motors where you dont need to be up in the rpms, or in the exact gear or you can relax and still make the 4 stroke pull hard everywhere. The 2 stroke you need to stay agressive, on the pipe, and in the right gear to keep the bike in peak horsepower making the 4 stroke an "easier" bike to ride.

That being said one of my dream bikes is still a 500AF. got my 450, 250smoker already now just need to work on that 500AF and life will be perfect. Although I am leaning toward a KTM300 pretty badly.
Foster576
Posts
1166
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
El Paso, TX US
10/6/2011 2:29pm
BobbyM wrote:
Moriarity New Mexico right??
rg4
Posts
163
Joined
1/9/2011
Location
Eastern, WA US
10/6/2011 2:59pm
Make me wonder why they ever bothered with a 450 4 stroke.
Shawn142 wrote:
Because a 4-stroke 450 is far easier to ride? It cracks me up how nostalgic people get over something like this. These things weren't even popular...
Because a 4-stroke 450 is far easier to ride? It cracks me up how nostalgic people get over something like this. These things weren't even popular when they were new. The bike wasn't good and while the kid riding it is doing okay he isn't lighting the world on fire. The same kid could probably turn faster laps on a 125.

Those guys on 4-strokes getting passed probably don't feel any worse than when a fast kid on an 80 blows by them. Should they all quit and go home in shame?
" These things weren't even popular when they were new. The bike wasn't good." Jeff Ward in 1989 & 1990, Mike Kiedrowski in1992 and Mike Larocco in 1993 may disagree with your statement after they won the 500 MX championships.

Also, Larry Rosseler, Danny LaPorte, Pual Krause, Ted Hunnicutt, Danny Hamel, Garth Sweetland, Paul Ostbo, Ty Davis and Marty Smith may also disagree about the KX 500 not being a good bike after the mighty KX500 consecutively won the Baja 1000 from 1988-1996.

The KX500 may be the most dominant dirt bike of all time.
tblazier
Posts
8808
Joined
7/20/2011
Location
Leesburg, VA US
10/6/2011 3:16pm
I took my CR500R out to Budds Creek last year and we all took turns on it between riding our 450's. Most of my buddies were amazed how fast they could go on the old beast. For me yes my YZ450F was easier to ride because the power is indeed easier to handle but you could pretty much ride the whole track in third gear on the 5-honey and go pretty damn fast. The main thing that slows you down is the brakes not the power. My 1990 CR500R has all the power any one south of RC could ever need but man brakes have come a LONG way in 20 years.


5honeys (24) by teyblyy, on Flickr
rg4
Posts
163
Joined
1/9/2011
Location
Eastern, WA US
10/6/2011 3:22pm Edited Date/Time 10/6/2011 3:27pm
tblazier wrote:
I took my CR500R out to Budds Creek last year and we all took turns on it between riding our 450's. Most of my buddies were...
I took my CR500R out to Budds Creek last year and we all took turns on it between riding our 450's. Most of my buddies were amazed how fast they could go on the old beast. For me yes my YZ450F was easier to ride because the power is indeed easier to handle but you could pretty much ride the whole track in third gear on the 5-honey and go pretty damn fast. The main thing that slows you down is the brakes not the power. My 1990 CR500R has all the power any one south of RC could ever need but man brakes have come a LONG way in 20 years.


5honeys (24) by teyblyy, on Flickr
WOW! Nice pair man. Love how the 1990 is stock including the pipe. You are a blessed man with a pair of CR's like that.
yam261
Posts
449
Joined
4/28/2011
Location
CA
10/6/2011 5:38pm
Great videos guys.
user760a
Posts
1202
Joined
9/15/2008
Location
Shelby, NC US
10/6/2011 7:06pm
tblazier wrote:
I took my CR500R out to Budds Creek last year and we all took turns on it between riding our 450's. Most of my buddies were...
I took my CR500R out to Budds Creek last year and we all took turns on it between riding our 450's. Most of my buddies were amazed how fast they could go on the old beast. For me yes my YZ450F was easier to ride because the power is indeed easier to handle but you could pretty much ride the whole track in third gear on the 5-honey and go pretty damn fast. The main thing that slows you down is the brakes not the power. My 1990 CR500R has all the power any one south of RC could ever need but man brakes have come a LONG way in 20 years.


5honeys (24) by teyblyy, on Flickr
I had a 1990 like that when I was 16, in 1991. Man I learned to tuck and roll...
AMA714
Posts
780
Joined
12/27/2007
Location
San Antonio, TX US
10/6/2011 7:22pm
user760a wrote:
I had a 1990 like that when I was 16, in 1991. Man I learned to tuck and roll...
[/img]

Thats why I have this...

Post a reply to: Kx500 braaaaaap porn (Video Inside)

The Latest