All

So your using the AMA vs the GP riders in the MXdN for your argument on which series is better? How many top GP riders have had to stay home because there was no room on their home team? RV, RD, Barcia, Canard, Tomac, Bagget, Stewart, DM, Osborne, all could make a real good run at the front but 6...

So we dont win the ISDE because it just isn't as poplular here but when it comes to the MXDN the reverse cant be true? If your saying it's a combination of things then I agree with you..But to say population is the only reason is easily refuted.

If size is so important please explain the ISDE results.

If these are reasons why the US dominates at the MXDN then can someone please explain the ISDE results.

If these are reasons why the US dominates at the MXDN then please explain the ISDE results.

I love the Nationals and the GP's and think the top of both series are very close, but to help DC make a point. So a deep sand race like Lommel is what you're going to use as a deciding factor in comparing the two series? Well I suppose if thats the case then AC and JH better come to...

I love the Nationals and the GP's and think the top of both series are very close but to help DC make a point. So a deep sand race like Lommel is what you're going to use as a deciding factor in comparing the two series? Well I suppose if thats the case then AC and JH better come to...