Historic Aircraft from back in the day

TeamGreen
Posts
37759
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
10/2/2026 12:43pm
PRM31 wrote:
The old F-16N was an awesome performing jet. For what it was intended…. The GE motors, strengthened wings, no gun, the old radar, basically just a...

The old F-16N was an awesome performing jet. For what it was intended…. The GE motors, strengthened wings, no gun, the old radar, basically just a hot rod. 

You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

IMG 1192 10
USN std “Aggressor? What The Hell???” colors
IMG 1191 1.jpeg?VersionId=xmmR.YmenH3OvPT4 d.JJKgQx
Dezert Bad Guy colors
IMG 1190 6
Russian Bad Guy colors 
4
1
plowboy
Posts
14827
Joined
1/3/2010
Location
Norwich, KS, USA
10/2/2026 12:46pm
TeamGreen wrote:
Here’s the coolest F16 EVER that actually evolved from the Agile F16 program…This is the Mitsubishi F2 Viper Zero…not kidding. Those strange looking wings are well…bigger...

Here’s the coolest F16 EVER that actually evolved from the Agile F16 program…

This is the Mitsubishi F2 Viper Zero…not kidding. Those strange looking wings are well…bigger, stronger, provide more range and…they’re Carbon-fiber.

But, get this, by the time the birds were built and the cost over-runs were calculated…one F2 could pay for 2-3 F16 Bloc 50-60 🤣IMG 1189 7

So much good stuff never makes it.  Most folks just couldn't fathom how the procurement system actually works.  Heads explode.

3
plowboy
Posts
14827
Joined
1/3/2010
Location
Norwich, KS, USA
10/2/2026 12:56pm
PRM31 wrote:
The old F-16N was an awesome performing jet. For what it was intended…. The GE motors, strengthened wings, no gun, the old radar, basically just a...

The old F-16N was an awesome performing jet. For what it was intended…. The GE motors, strengthened wings, no gun, the old radar, basically just a hot rod. 

TeamGreen wrote:
You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

IMG 1192 10
USN std “Aggressor? What The Hell???” colors
IMG 1191 1.jpeg?VersionId=xmmR.YmenH3OvPT4 d.JJKgQx
Dezert Bad Guy colors
IMG 1190 6
Russian Bad Guy colors 

I was at Holloman when they were dismantling the last of the F4 drones and gutting the cockpits/installing the Ironman in the F16's.  Sad seeing the coal burners gone and perfectly good 16's relegated to such work.  Oh well...in the words Mellencamp, "Life goes on".

3
LoudLove
Posts
3002
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
10/2/2026 1:14pm
PRM31 wrote:
The old F-16N was an awesome performing jet. For what it was intended…. The GE motors, strengthened wings, no gun, the old radar, basically just a...

The old F-16N was an awesome performing jet. For what it was intended…. The GE motors, strengthened wings, no gun, the old radar, basically just a hot rod. 

TeamGreen wrote:
You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

IMG 1192 10
USN std “Aggressor? What The Hell???” colors
IMG 1191 1.jpeg?VersionId=xmmR.YmenH3OvPT4 d.JJKgQx
Dezert Bad Guy colors
IMG 1190 6
Russian Bad Guy colors 
plowboy wrote:
I was at Holloman when they were dismantling the last of the F4 drones and gutting the cockpits/installing the Ironman in the F16's.  Sad seeing the...

I was at Holloman when they were dismantling the last of the F4 drones and gutting the cockpits/installing the Ironman in the F16's.  Sad seeing the coal burners gone and perfectly good 16's relegated to such work.  Oh well...in the words Mellencamp, "Life goes on".

Navy still have an aggressor squadron at NAS Key West?  That would have been a cool shore duty assignment. Beats ROTC instructor at some God-forsaken college in the Midwest. 

2

The Shop

PRM31
Posts
3870
Joined
8/7/2009
Location
Northern, VA, USA
Fantasy
10/2/2026 1:48pm
TeamGreen wrote:
You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

IMG 1192 10
USN std “Aggressor? What The Hell???” colors
IMG 1191 1.jpeg?VersionId=xmmR.YmenH3OvPT4 d.JJKgQx
Dezert Bad Guy colors
IMG 1190 6
Russian Bad Guy colors 

Ha ha, the F-16N (N for Navy) was a small number of dedicated adversary F-16s back in the 90s. They were flown by the two adversary squadrons, one at Oceana and the other Miramar, and with TopGun, which was still at Miramar.  These things started as F-16Cs and were stripped down to the bare minimum to be the lightest F-16s with the biggest motors at the time. Only thing lacking was the big-mouth intake. But these flew completely slick, approximately zero drag. They could turn and accelerate like nothing else! Escaping once in a dogfight was not an option. They could simply turn on a dime (turn into a white cloud) and get back to 600 kts to chase you, or shoot. I was flying with a young guy one day and we were in a good fight and we passed 180 out with an F-16N. We were pointed ~30deg down in full blower accelerating through ~300 kts. The F-16N was going up. He turned into a white cloud as we were passing and proceeded to be pointed at us in zero time and gained enough speed for a shot. That boys and girls was our lesson for the day. Do not try to escape!

The only way to beat them was to get into a very tight fight and get them on their AOA limiter. Then, and only then, could our big motor F-14Ds outperform them. That was before digital flight controls were installed in the Toms. Good pilots could make that thing turn inside itself or do some unusual pirouettes. I had the best seat in the house for many, many great fights with Ns, as well as A4 Super F, F-15, F/A-18, F-16C, F-5, you name it. I was fortunate to fly with THE guy who in my opinion was the best 1v1 dogfight pilot in the Navy. We got calls from units all over the west to fight him personally. In a year and a half flying with him, he lost only 1 engagement. All we did was air-to-air in those days. That was the first one of the day against an F-16N being flown by a guy he trained. It was our first day flying with external tanks installed (working towards deployment) and we were at the range closest to Miramar so we were still very fat on gas. Jet wouldn't quite do what he wanted and he got beat. The next three engagements were the most aggressive I ever felt a Tomcat get flown and they resulted in three tracking guns kills on the F-16N. That was certainly not the norm. As I type this, I recall the last TopGun class to have the F-16Ns as adversaries was in late '94.  

The F-16 adversaries today are still cool jets, but they are not F-16Ns! 

7
TeamGreen
Posts
37759
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
10/2/2026 2:10pm Edited Date/Time 10/2/2026 2:12pm
TeamGreen wrote:
You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

IMG 1192 10
USN std “Aggressor? What The Hell???” colors
IMG 1191 1.jpeg?VersionId=xmmR.YmenH3OvPT4 d.JJKgQx
Dezert Bad Guy colors
IMG 1190 6
Russian Bad Guy colors 
PRM31 wrote:
Ha ha, the F-16N (N for Navy) was a small number of dedicated adversary F-16s back in the 90s. They were flown by the two adversary...

Ha ha, the F-16N (N for Navy) was a small number of dedicated adversary F-16s back in the 90s. They were flown by the two adversary squadrons, one at Oceana and the other Miramar, and with TopGun, which was still at Miramar.  These things started as F-16Cs and were stripped down to the bare minimum to be the lightest F-16s with the biggest motors at the time. Only thing lacking was the big-mouth intake. But these flew completely slick, approximately zero drag. They could turn and accelerate like nothing else! Escaping once in a dogfight was not an option. They could simply turn on a dime (turn into a white cloud) and get back to 600 kts to chase you, or shoot. I was flying with a young guy one day and we were in a good fight and we passed 180 out with an F-16N. We were pointed ~30deg down in full blower accelerating through ~300 kts. The F-16N was going up. He turned into a white cloud as we were passing and proceeded to be pointed at us in zero time and gained enough speed for a shot. That boys and girls was our lesson for the day. Do not try to escape!

The only way to beat them was to get into a very tight fight and get them on their AOA limiter. Then, and only then, could our big motor F-14Ds outperform them. That was before digital flight controls were installed in the Toms. Good pilots could make that thing turn inside itself or do some unusual pirouettes. I had the best seat in the house for many, many great fights with Ns, as well as A4 Super F, F-15, F/A-18, F-16C, F-5, you name it. I was fortunate to fly with THE guy who in my opinion was the best 1v1 dogfight pilot in the Navy. We got calls from units all over the west to fight him personally. In a year and a half flying with him, he lost only 1 engagement. All we did was air-to-air in those days. That was the first one of the day against an F-16N being flown by a guy he trained. It was our first day flying with external tanks installed (working towards deployment) and we were at the range closest to Miramar so we were still very fat on gas. Jet wouldn't quite do what he wanted and he got beat. The next three engagements were the most aggressive I ever felt a Tomcat get flown and they resulted in three tracking guns kills on the F-16N. That was certainly not the norm. As I type this, I recall the last TopGun class to have the F-16Ns as adversaries was in late '94.  

The F-16 adversaries today are still cool jets, but they are not F-16Ns! 

Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru the canopy into the never-never… please.

Also…did you ever make weapons decisions/selection?

Oh, and…how about some stories how the wings fold fwd and back based on speed and other inputs…like when you dragged those 16Ns into their uncomfortable situations…

Stoked that we have someone that flew the later-bad-ass variant!

1
1
TeamGreen
Posts
37759
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
10/2/2026 4:16pm Edited Date/Time 10/2/2026 4:16pm

From the fine folks at Lock-Mart…

The latest Viper: Bloc 70/72…The Humpback 😎

And a few deliverables…

IMG 0367 5
Welcome to the F16 Sales Brochure🤣
IMG 0370 2
The 2 Seat FUCK CHINA Model
IMG 0369 4
The Single Seat FUCK CHINA Model 
IMG 0368 3.jpeg?VersionId=GS3oIKbTr7ESm7Ijju
I believe this is the 1st Taiwan deliverable 

 

5
LoudLove
Posts
3002
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
10/3/2026 5:21am
TeamGreen wrote:
You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

You might wanna explain the “N” to the gallery or anyone that didn’t have the Aggressors in their notes…🤣

IMG 1192 10
USN std “Aggressor? What The Hell???” colors
IMG 1191 1.jpeg?VersionId=xmmR.YmenH3OvPT4 d.JJKgQx
Dezert Bad Guy colors
IMG 1190 6
Russian Bad Guy colors 
PRM31 wrote:
Ha ha, the F-16N (N for Navy) was a small number of dedicated adversary F-16s back in the 90s. They were flown by the two adversary...

Ha ha, the F-16N (N for Navy) was a small number of dedicated adversary F-16s back in the 90s. They were flown by the two adversary squadrons, one at Oceana and the other Miramar, and with TopGun, which was still at Miramar.  These things started as F-16Cs and were stripped down to the bare minimum to be the lightest F-16s with the biggest motors at the time. Only thing lacking was the big-mouth intake. But these flew completely slick, approximately zero drag. They could turn and accelerate like nothing else! Escaping once in a dogfight was not an option. They could simply turn on a dime (turn into a white cloud) and get back to 600 kts to chase you, or shoot. I was flying with a young guy one day and we were in a good fight and we passed 180 out with an F-16N. We were pointed ~30deg down in full blower accelerating through ~300 kts. The F-16N was going up. He turned into a white cloud as we were passing and proceeded to be pointed at us in zero time and gained enough speed for a shot. That boys and girls was our lesson for the day. Do not try to escape!

The only way to beat them was to get into a very tight fight and get them on their AOA limiter. Then, and only then, could our big motor F-14Ds outperform them. That was before digital flight controls were installed in the Toms. Good pilots could make that thing turn inside itself or do some unusual pirouettes. I had the best seat in the house for many, many great fights with Ns, as well as A4 Super F, F-15, F/A-18, F-16C, F-5, you name it. I was fortunate to fly with THE guy who in my opinion was the best 1v1 dogfight pilot in the Navy. We got calls from units all over the west to fight him personally. In a year and a half flying with him, he lost only 1 engagement. All we did was air-to-air in those days. That was the first one of the day against an F-16N being flown by a guy he trained. It was our first day flying with external tanks installed (working towards deployment) and we were at the range closest to Miramar so we were still very fat on gas. Jet wouldn't quite do what he wanted and he got beat. The next three engagements were the most aggressive I ever felt a Tomcat get flown and they resulted in three tracking guns kills on the F-16N. That was certainly not the norm. As I type this, I recall the last TopGun class to have the F-16Ns as adversaries was in late '94.  

The F-16 adversaries today are still cool jets, but they are not F-16Ns! 

TeamGreen wrote:
Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru...

Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru the canopy into the never-never… please.

Also…did you ever make weapons decisions/selection?

Oh, and…how about some stories how the wings fold fwd and back based on speed and other inputs…like when you dragged those 16Ns into their uncomfortable situations…

Stoked that we have someone that flew the later-bad-ass variant!

Tomcats are the most impressive aircraft in US Navy history. And this coming from an A-6 guy!  Their air-to-mud capabilities were discovered late in the game, and the retrofits didn’t do the F-14 justice. The navy was all-in on the F/A-18 had the go-forward platform, replacing both Tomcats and Intruders. Hornets remain an outstanding aircraft that still plays a large role 40+ years after its initial deployment, but for sheer brute force, range, and versatility, the F-14 is one of one. 

5
ShellyMX
Posts
1422
Joined
3/22/2026
Location
Smyrna, GA, USA
10/3/2026 12:06pm
IMG 2865 5
1
G-man
Posts
9423
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
10/3/2026 6:22pm

On 3 October 1967, a B-52 bomber took off over the Mojave Desert carrying a small black rocket plane under its wing. Inside it sat Air Force Major Pete Knight.

The plane was the X-15, built to fly faster than any aircraft before it. At those speeds the air itself becomes hot enough to destroy a plane, so engineers had covered this one in a special coating designed to burn away in flight instead of the metal. It would not be enough.

Near Mud Lake, Nevada, the B-52 released him. Knight fired the rocket engine.

The X-15 accelerated through Mach 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. At engine burnout, Knight was flying 4,520 mph, Mach 6.7, at 102,100 feet. A mile and a quarter every second. No pilot had ever flown an airplane that fast. No pilot has since.

The speed came at a price. Under the belly, the superheated air passed 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit, far more than the coating could take. The heat burned past it, into the plane itself. It melted a test engine clean off the aircraft. It burned holes in the tail fin. It damaged wiring and pressure lines. Passing Mach 5.5, a high-temperature warning lit up in the cockpit, and Knight brought the damaged plane home to Edwards Air Force Base.

Still in his pressure suit, he walked around the X-15 and saw what the flight had done. The damage stunned NASA's engineers. The plane was repaired, but it never flew again.

12 men flew the X-15. 1 of them was Neil Armstrong. None of them, and nobody since in any airplane, flew faster than Pete Knight did 59 years ago today. President Johnson handed him the Harmon Trophy. The program just called him Speedy Pete.

1000018694.jpg?VersionId=tPfq9AwuBRFjd
11
PRM31
Posts
3870
Joined
8/7/2009
Location
Northern, VA, USA
Fantasy
10/3/2026 6:32pm

That is cool! ^^^

3
ShellyMX
Posts
1422
Joined
3/22/2026
Location
Smyrna, GA, USA
10/3/2026 7:28pm
IMG 2868 6
2
PRM31
Posts
3870
Joined
8/7/2009
Location
Northern, VA, USA
Fantasy
10/3/2026 7:36pm Edited Date/Time 10/3/2026 7:40pm
TeamGreen wrote:
Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru...

Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru the canopy into the never-never… please.

Also…did you ever make weapons decisions/selection?

Oh, and…how about some stories how the wings fold fwd and back based on speed and other inputs…like when you dragged those 16Ns into their uncomfortable situations…

Stoked that we have someone that flew the later-bad-ass variant!

The RIO’s job goes back to the original mission of the Tomcat, long range Fleet defense. Operating the sensors to locate, track, and get off shots on Rooskie bombers carrying anti-ship missiles and employing heavy jamming. The radar displays were set up to show both synthetic radar tracks and to also see the raw radar return to help with identifying the jamming techniques. We also used that display for all the non-tracking modes.  We could pick from various radar modes, pulse repetition frequencies or sensors to defeat the jamming. Lots of tools in the tool box. Because there were so many what I’ll call ‘manual’ modes, the person could really make a difference in challenging situations.  While cruising around you could just put the radar in Track While Scan, set the scan volume, point it to the correct piece of sky and it worked very well.

Pilots only controlled radar when using dog fight modes.

For weapons, the pilot made the weapons selection. Either seat could shoot radar missiles. Only the pilot could shoot the sidewinders or gun. No real standard as to who shot the radar missiles, just a clear agreement that everything was good and nobody was going to mess it up by selecting a different weapon or sensor mode.

Lookout, simply do it as much as possible. If the pilot was fighting someone in the visual arena I was looking elsewhere and keeping an eye on altitude, airspeed, fuel, and keeping my thumb on the chaff dispenser, etc.  

Wings were easy, put them in auto. In a dog fight they would always be full forward. Big straight wings and a lot of flat fuselage created excellent lift at slow speeds. Big motors allowed the jet to stand on its tail too. About the only time they were manually positioned was to put them back when coming into the break to land. Looked cooler, and leaving them back as long as possible helped to bleed speed from 500-600 down to approach speed (~135 kts). Interesting trivia, the wings had an oversweep position for parking on the carrier, but you couldn’t fly with them there. Some paintings show the wings in oversweep while flying. Ugh.

We also had a reconnaissance mission. There was a big pod with three cameras. That was a favorite mission of mine. On deployment we got the cool missions to go places not typical to get the requested pics.

Once we got the LANTIRN targeting pod and started carrying bombs that added a whole new skillset. The Tom was a good precision bomber, but whether big bombs or small, we only carried four. Pretty pitiful compared to the A-6. But the way we carried them flush against the rail they didn’t add that much drag so our range or speed wasn’t hit too bad.

Having two people helped with the really dynamic and demanding CSAR and FAC(A) missions. (Combat Search and Rescue and Forward Air Controller-Airborne).  It would take a novel to capture the effort and complexity of those.

The Tom was a great jet during its time. The performance would still be solid today. The stealthy attributes and modern avionics on newer jets have come a long ways though. Time moves on.

The view was spectacular!

IMG 3024 3.jpeg?VersionId=YpvmlpA3qg52cOK8I9OYqFk


IMG 0125 4

13
Sully
Posts
9597
Joined
8/24/2006
Location
JP
10/3/2026 9:00pm
TeamGreen wrote:
Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru...

Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru the canopy into the never-never… please.

Also…did you ever make weapons decisions/selection?

Oh, and…how about some stories how the wings fold fwd and back based on speed and other inputs…like when you dragged those 16Ns into their uncomfortable situations…

Stoked that we have someone that flew the later-bad-ass variant!

PRM31 wrote:
The RIO’s job goes back to the original mission of the Tomcat, long range Fleet defense. Operating the sensors to locate, track, and get off shots...

The RIO’s job goes back to the original mission of the Tomcat, long range Fleet defense. Operating the sensors to locate, track, and get off shots on Rooskie bombers carrying anti-ship missiles and employing heavy jamming. The radar displays were set up to show both synthetic radar tracks and to also see the raw radar return to help with identifying the jamming techniques. We also used that display for all the non-tracking modes.  We could pick from various radar modes, pulse repetition frequencies or sensors to defeat the jamming. Lots of tools in the tool box. Because there were so many what I’ll call ‘manual’ modes, the person could really make a difference in challenging situations.  While cruising around you could just put the radar in Track While Scan, set the scan volume, point it to the correct piece of sky and it worked very well.

Pilots only controlled radar when using dog fight modes.

For weapons, the pilot made the weapons selection. Either seat could shoot radar missiles. Only the pilot could shoot the sidewinders or gun. No real standard as to who shot the radar missiles, just a clear agreement that everything was good and nobody was going to mess it up by selecting a different weapon or sensor mode.

Lookout, simply do it as much as possible. If the pilot was fighting someone in the visual arena I was looking elsewhere and keeping an eye on altitude, airspeed, fuel, and keeping my thumb on the chaff dispenser, etc.  

Wings were easy, put them in auto. In a dog fight they would always be full forward. Big straight wings and a lot of flat fuselage created excellent lift at slow speeds. Big motors allowed the jet to stand on its tail too. About the only time they were manually positioned was to put them back when coming into the break to land. Looked cooler, and leaving them back as long as possible helped to bleed speed from 500-600 down to approach speed (~135 kts). Interesting trivia, the wings had an oversweep position for parking on the carrier, but you couldn’t fly with them there. Some paintings show the wings in oversweep while flying. Ugh.

We also had a reconnaissance mission. There was a big pod with three cameras. That was a favorite mission of mine. On deployment we got the cool missions to go places not typical to get the requested pics.

Once we got the LANTIRN targeting pod and started carrying bombs that added a whole new skillset. The Tom was a good precision bomber, but whether big bombs or small, we only carried four. Pretty pitiful compared to the A-6. But the way we carried them flush against the rail they didn’t add that much drag so our range or speed wasn’t hit too bad.

Having two people helped with the really dynamic and demanding CSAR and FAC(A) missions. (Combat Search and Rescue and Forward Air Controller-Airborne).  It would take a novel to capture the effort and complexity of those.

The Tom was a great jet during its time. The performance would still be solid today. The stealthy attributes and modern avionics on newer jets have come a long ways though. Time moves on.

The view was spectacular!

IMG 3024 3.jpeg?VersionId=YpvmlpA3qg52cOK8I9OYqFk


IMG 0125 4

Man I’m glad I never had to go to a TARPs squadron as a PH. Unless they got sent TAD to the ship’s photo lab or CVIC (carrier intel center) underway, those poor Photomates were just over educated airframers when you guys weren’t flying the pod. 

3
LoudLove
Posts
3002
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
10/4/2026 5:41am
TeamGreen wrote:
Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru...

Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru the canopy into the never-never… please.

Also…did you ever make weapons decisions/selection?

Oh, and…how about some stories how the wings fold fwd and back based on speed and other inputs…like when you dragged those 16Ns into their uncomfortable situations…

Stoked that we have someone that flew the later-bad-ass variant!

PRM31 wrote:
The RIO’s job goes back to the original mission of the Tomcat, long range Fleet defense. Operating the sensors to locate, track, and get off shots...

The RIO’s job goes back to the original mission of the Tomcat, long range Fleet defense. Operating the sensors to locate, track, and get off shots on Rooskie bombers carrying anti-ship missiles and employing heavy jamming. The radar displays were set up to show both synthetic radar tracks and to also see the raw radar return to help with identifying the jamming techniques. We also used that display for all the non-tracking modes.  We could pick from various radar modes, pulse repetition frequencies or sensors to defeat the jamming. Lots of tools in the tool box. Because there were so many what I’ll call ‘manual’ modes, the person could really make a difference in challenging situations.  While cruising around you could just put the radar in Track While Scan, set the scan volume, point it to the correct piece of sky and it worked very well.

Pilots only controlled radar when using dog fight modes.

For weapons, the pilot made the weapons selection. Either seat could shoot radar missiles. Only the pilot could shoot the sidewinders or gun. No real standard as to who shot the radar missiles, just a clear agreement that everything was good and nobody was going to mess it up by selecting a different weapon or sensor mode.

Lookout, simply do it as much as possible. If the pilot was fighting someone in the visual arena I was looking elsewhere and keeping an eye on altitude, airspeed, fuel, and keeping my thumb on the chaff dispenser, etc.  

Wings were easy, put them in auto. In a dog fight they would always be full forward. Big straight wings and a lot of flat fuselage created excellent lift at slow speeds. Big motors allowed the jet to stand on its tail too. About the only time they were manually positioned was to put them back when coming into the break to land. Looked cooler, and leaving them back as long as possible helped to bleed speed from 500-600 down to approach speed (~135 kts). Interesting trivia, the wings had an oversweep position for parking on the carrier, but you couldn’t fly with them there. Some paintings show the wings in oversweep while flying. Ugh.

We also had a reconnaissance mission. There was a big pod with three cameras. That was a favorite mission of mine. On deployment we got the cool missions to go places not typical to get the requested pics.

Once we got the LANTIRN targeting pod and started carrying bombs that added a whole new skillset. The Tom was a good precision bomber, but whether big bombs or small, we only carried four. Pretty pitiful compared to the A-6. But the way we carried them flush against the rail they didn’t add that much drag so our range or speed wasn’t hit too bad.

Having two people helped with the really dynamic and demanding CSAR and FAC(A) missions. (Combat Search and Rescue and Forward Air Controller-Airborne).  It would take a novel to capture the effort and complexity of those.

The Tom was a great jet during its time. The performance would still be solid today. The stealthy attributes and modern avionics on newer jets have come a long ways though. Time moves on.

The view was spectacular!

IMG 3024 3.jpeg?VersionId=YpvmlpA3qg52cOK8I9OYqFk


IMG 0125 4

The F-14 on the cat and working its way through burner zones was a sight to behold, especially at night. Even approaching the shuttle the Tomcat would lower the front gear (the crouch?), giving it even more of a hot rod look. 

The Intruder’s radar and avionics were mediocre at best.  The FLIR pod was awesome, but the navigation computer had a tendency to “walk” from the target. Meaning the B/N could set the cursor on a specific point and watch that cursor drift away. We were constantly slewing the cursor back on target while desperately stabbing at the update button. Sometimes it even worked. 

Being a side by side cockpit the pilot and B/N shared recovery duties.  This was especially valuable at night as the pilot would fly the needles while I got a visual on lineup, meatball, and AOA. At 3/4 mile I’d call the ball and bring my scan inside while the pilot simultaneously went eyes-up.  From there I’d monitor the VSI and call out the rate of descent. The VSI would provide feedback before the ball, so the pilot could add power or go easy with it and catch the ball before it moved. Night time landings are never routine, and my pilot buddies who transitioned to Hornets often said that’s when they missed the A-6 the most. 

8
lappedrider
Posts
1566
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Tooele, UT, USA
10/4/2026 8:07am
SEEMEFIRST wrote:
Dad flew with VMFA-312. They had distinctive checkerboard markings. (Checkerboard squadron). They were just VMF-312 back then.They later added the helmeted bulldog, but that was after...

Dad flew with VMFA-312. They had distinctive checkerboard markings. (Checkerboard squadron). They were just VMF-312 back then.

They later added the helmeted bulldog, but that was after his time, I think.

Something like this....

1000005224 1.jpg?VersionId=TpasvJRmB VIGiVE0Xsy.z4zx KB

Can’t see a Fury/Sabre without thinking about Lee Majors

IMG 8803 2IMG 8801 4.jpeg?VersionId=yTvWW1G0LXWr7p mF36QA97h10IMG 8800 6.jpeg?VersionId=RY5lp4HvFezsY
2
ShellyMX
Posts
1422
Joined
3/22/2026
Location
Smyrna, GA, USA
10/4/2026 9:33am
IMG 2875 7.jpeg?VersionId=d1wB.GNB8l0ayinfFxd9tPY
4
TeamGreen
Posts
37759
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
10/4/2026 2:05pm
TeamGreen wrote:
Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru...

Give us some background on your job in the back seat and using your skills on the scope and how your eyes are always searching thru the canopy into the never-never… please.

Also…did you ever make weapons decisions/selection?

Oh, and…how about some stories how the wings fold fwd and back based on speed and other inputs…like when you dragged those 16Ns into their uncomfortable situations…

Stoked that we have someone that flew the later-bad-ass variant!

PRM31 wrote:
The RIO’s job goes back to the original mission of the Tomcat, long range Fleet defense. Operating the sensors to locate, track, and get off shots...

The RIO’s job goes back to the original mission of the Tomcat, long range Fleet defense. Operating the sensors to locate, track, and get off shots on Rooskie bombers carrying anti-ship missiles and employing heavy jamming. The radar displays were set up to show both synthetic radar tracks and to also see the raw radar return to help with identifying the jamming techniques. We also used that display for all the non-tracking modes.  We could pick from various radar modes, pulse repetition frequencies or sensors to defeat the jamming. Lots of tools in the tool box. Because there were so many what I’ll call ‘manual’ modes, the person could really make a difference in challenging situations.  While cruising around you could just put the radar in Track While Scan, set the scan volume, point it to the correct piece of sky and it worked very well.

Pilots only controlled radar when using dog fight modes.

For weapons, the pilot made the weapons selection. Either seat could shoot radar missiles. Only the pilot could shoot the sidewinders or gun. No real standard as to who shot the radar missiles, just a clear agreement that everything was good and nobody was going to mess it up by selecting a different weapon or sensor mode.

Lookout, simply do it as much as possible. If the pilot was fighting someone in the visual arena I was looking elsewhere and keeping an eye on altitude, airspeed, fuel, and keeping my thumb on the chaff dispenser, etc.  

Wings were easy, put them in auto. In a dog fight they would always be full forward. Big straight wings and a lot of flat fuselage created excellent lift at slow speeds. Big motors allowed the jet to stand on its tail too. About the only time they were manually positioned was to put them back when coming into the break to land. Looked cooler, and leaving them back as long as possible helped to bleed speed from 500-600 down to approach speed (~135 kts). Interesting trivia, the wings had an oversweep position for parking on the carrier, but you couldn’t fly with them there. Some paintings show the wings in oversweep while flying. Ugh.

We also had a reconnaissance mission. There was a big pod with three cameras. That was a favorite mission of mine. On deployment we got the cool missions to go places not typical to get the requested pics.

Once we got the LANTIRN targeting pod and started carrying bombs that added a whole new skillset. The Tom was a good precision bomber, but whether big bombs or small, we only carried four. Pretty pitiful compared to the A-6. But the way we carried them flush against the rail they didn’t add that much drag so our range or speed wasn’t hit too bad.

Having two people helped with the really dynamic and demanding CSAR and FAC(A) missions. (Combat Search and Rescue and Forward Air Controller-Airborne).  It would take a novel to capture the effort and complexity of those.

The Tom was a great jet during its time. The performance would still be solid today. The stealthy attributes and modern avionics on newer jets have come a long ways though. Time moves on.

The view was spectacular!

IMG 3024 3.jpeg?VersionId=YpvmlpA3qg52cOK8I9OYqFk


IMG 0125 4

Thanks for explaining the multiple missions and the breadth of your capabilities. 

3
APLMAN99
Posts
12944
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR, USA
Fantasy
10/4/2026 2:27pm

The video is from a flight simulator, but the terrain is crazily realistic. The place I grew up in is approximately 10:26 in. There are a lot more houses there now than when I grew up (it was all orchards way back then). This is VR1350 from Whidbey Island.  A lot of the time the planes would dive down after crossing the ridge just before getting to us, and the lowest altitude there was only 200’ above ground level. 

Seemed like most of the planes as I got older were A-6/EA-6 types but there were some others that I’m not really sure about. 

 

2
LoudLove
Posts
3002
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
10/4/2026 5:44pm
APLMAN99 wrote:
The video is from a flight simulator, but the terrain is crazily realistic. The place I grew up in is approximately 10:26 in. There are a...

The video is from a flight simulator, but the terrain is crazily realistic. The place I grew up in is approximately 10:26 in. There are a lot more houses there now than when I grew up (it was all orchards way back then). This is VR1350 from Whidbey Island.  A lot of the time the planes would dive down after crossing the ridge just before getting to us, and the lowest altitude there was only 200’ above ground level. 

Seemed like most of the planes as I got older were A-6/EA-6 types but there were some others that I’m not really sure about. 

 

 VRs were super challenging.  Even though the course was laid out, things can go south quickly when doing 420 kts at <500’ AGL. I have several friends and compatriots who wound up on the wrong side of a VR route, including one that hit the Columbia River outside of Wenatchee.  

2
ShellyMX
Posts
1422
Joined
3/22/2026
Location
Smyrna, GA, USA
10/4/2026 5:55pm
PRM31 wrote:
The RIO’s job goes back to the original mission of the Tomcat, long range Fleet defense. Operating the sensors to locate, track, and get off shots...

The RIO’s job goes back to the original mission of the Tomcat, long range Fleet defense. Operating the sensors to locate, track, and get off shots on Rooskie bombers carrying anti-ship missiles and employing heavy jamming. The radar displays were set up to show both synthetic radar tracks and to also see the raw radar return to help with identifying the jamming techniques. We also used that display for all the non-tracking modes.  We could pick from various radar modes, pulse repetition frequencies or sensors to defeat the jamming. Lots of tools in the tool box. Because there were so many what I’ll call ‘manual’ modes, the person could really make a difference in challenging situations.  While cruising around you could just put the radar in Track While Scan, set the scan volume, point it to the correct piece of sky and it worked very well.

Pilots only controlled radar when using dog fight modes.

For weapons, the pilot made the weapons selection. Either seat could shoot radar missiles. Only the pilot could shoot the sidewinders or gun. No real standard as to who shot the radar missiles, just a clear agreement that everything was good and nobody was going to mess it up by selecting a different weapon or sensor mode.

Lookout, simply do it as much as possible. If the pilot was fighting someone in the visual arena I was looking elsewhere and keeping an eye on altitude, airspeed, fuel, and keeping my thumb on the chaff dispenser, etc.  

Wings were easy, put them in auto. In a dog fight they would always be full forward. Big straight wings and a lot of flat fuselage created excellent lift at slow speeds. Big motors allowed the jet to stand on its tail too. About the only time they were manually positioned was to put them back when coming into the break to land. Looked cooler, and leaving them back as long as possible helped to bleed speed from 500-600 down to approach speed (~135 kts). Interesting trivia, the wings had an oversweep position for parking on the carrier, but you couldn’t fly with them there. Some paintings show the wings in oversweep while flying. Ugh.

We also had a reconnaissance mission. There was a big pod with three cameras. That was a favorite mission of mine. On deployment we got the cool missions to go places not typical to get the requested pics.

Once we got the LANTIRN targeting pod and started carrying bombs that added a whole new skillset. The Tom was a good precision bomber, but whether big bombs or small, we only carried four. Pretty pitiful compared to the A-6. But the way we carried them flush against the rail they didn’t add that much drag so our range or speed wasn’t hit too bad.

Having two people helped with the really dynamic and demanding CSAR and FAC(A) missions. (Combat Search and Rescue and Forward Air Controller-Airborne).  It would take a novel to capture the effort and complexity of those.

The Tom was a great jet during its time. The performance would still be solid today. The stealthy attributes and modern avionics on newer jets have come a long ways though. Time moves on.

The view was spectacular!

IMG 3024 3.jpeg?VersionId=YpvmlpA3qg52cOK8I9OYqFk


IMG 0125 4

You sir, are a bad ass.🫡

1
APLMAN99
Posts
12944
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR, USA
Fantasy
10/4/2026 6:00pm
APLMAN99 wrote:
The video is from a flight simulator, but the terrain is crazily realistic. The place I grew up in is approximately 10:26 in. There are a...

The video is from a flight simulator, but the terrain is crazily realistic. The place I grew up in is approximately 10:26 in. There are a lot more houses there now than when I grew up (it was all orchards way back then). This is VR1350 from Whidbey Island.  A lot of the time the planes would dive down after crossing the ridge just before getting to us, and the lowest altitude there was only 200’ above ground level. 

Seemed like most of the planes as I got older were A-6/EA-6 types but there were some others that I’m not really sure about. 

 

LoudLove wrote:
 VRs were super challenging.  Even though the course was laid out, things can go south quickly when doing 420 kts at <500’ AGL. I have several...

 VRs were super challenging.  Even though the course was laid out, things can go south quickly when doing 420 kts at <500’ AGL. I have several friends and compatriots who wound up on the wrong side of a VR route, including one that hit the Columbia River outside of Wenatchee.  

I remember the one that clipped the rocks coming down the Palisades. I also remember one in that same area that clipped a power line. He didn’t completely realize it until he landed but the wire came down just behind the cab of a truck and demolished the camper (and the truck too, just didn’t kill any of the occupants!).  I’m pretty sure that I posted the news story about that incident a while back. 

That area is a little over an hour’s drive south of where I grew up. 

The rocks that the pilot clipped are right about where the number for HWY 28 is on this map.  He was coming down the canyon/coulee SW and where it meets the Columbia River valley, he was hugging just a bit too close on his left. 

Hard not to think about it when you go by it. A few more feet and he likely would have made it home. 

IMG 0881 3

2
LoudLove
Posts
3002
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
10/4/2026 6:07pm
APLMAN99 wrote:
The video is from a flight simulator, but the terrain is crazily realistic. The place I grew up in is approximately 10:26 in. There are a...

The video is from a flight simulator, but the terrain is crazily realistic. The place I grew up in is approximately 10:26 in. There are a lot more houses there now than when I grew up (it was all orchards way back then). This is VR1350 from Whidbey Island.  A lot of the time the planes would dive down after crossing the ridge just before getting to us, and the lowest altitude there was only 200’ above ground level. 

Seemed like most of the planes as I got older were A-6/EA-6 types but there were some others that I’m not really sure about. 

 

LoudLove wrote:
 VRs were super challenging.  Even though the course was laid out, things can go south quickly when doing 420 kts at <500’ AGL. I have several...

 VRs were super challenging.  Even though the course was laid out, things can go south quickly when doing 420 kts at <500’ AGL. I have several friends and compatriots who wound up on the wrong side of a VR route, including one that hit the Columbia River outside of Wenatchee.  

APLMAN99 wrote:
I remember the one that clipped the rocks coming down the Palisades. I also remember one in that same area that clipped a power line. He...

I remember the one that clipped the rocks coming down the Palisades. I also remember one in that same area that clipped a power line. He didn’t completely realize it until he landed but the wire came down just behind the cab of a truck and demolished the camper (and the truck too, just didn’t kill any of the occupants!).  I’m pretty sure that I posted the news story about that incident a while back. 

That area is a little over an hour’s drive south of where I grew up. 

The rocks that the pilot clipped are right about where the number for HWY 28 is on this map.  He was coming down the canyon/coulee SW and where it meets the Columbia River valley, he was hugging just a bit too close on his left. 

Hard not to think about it when you go by it. A few more feet and he likely would have made it home. 

IMG 0881 3

My buddy’s crash was in 1991. I was at sea when we got the news (so around Sept or Oct). Grady was a super guy from Shreveport, LA. 

2
G-man
Posts
9423
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
1 day ago

Awesome Bomber for its day.

The Convair B-36 Peacemaker was truly one of the great giants of the Cold War. With its enormous wingspan, six piston engines and later four additional jet engines, the B-36 looked almost unreal when it took to the sky. 

Compared with the sleek B-58 Hustler and the futuristic XB-70 Valkyrie, the Peacemaker represented a completely different approach to strategic air power. The B-58 was built around speed, while the XB-70 was designed to push toward Mach 3. The B-36 relied on something more fundamental: enormous size, long range, and the ability to carry a massive bomb load across continents. 

It may have been slower and older-looking than its supersonic successors, but for a time, the B-36 was quite simply the giant of America's Cold War skies.

1000018803.jpg?VersionId=uIWA6ZdQw3KZtXcWkBFiZe1pdxo9R9
1
1 day ago
G-man wrote:
Awesome Bomber for its day.The Convair B-36 Peacemaker was truly one of the great giants of the Cold War. With its enormous wingspan, six piston engines...

Awesome Bomber for its day.

The Convair B-36 Peacemaker was truly one of the great giants of the Cold War. With its enormous wingspan, six piston engines and later four additional jet engines, the B-36 looked almost unreal when it took to the sky. 

Compared with the sleek B-58 Hustler and the futuristic XB-70 Valkyrie, the Peacemaker represented a completely different approach to strategic air power. The B-58 was built around speed, while the XB-70 was designed to push toward Mach 3. The B-36 relied on something more fundamental: enormous size, long range, and the ability to carry a massive bomb load across continents. 

It may have been slower and older-looking than its supersonic successors, but for a time, the B-36 was quite simply the giant of America's Cold War skies.

1000018803.jpg?VersionId=uIWA6ZdQw3KZtXcWkBFiZe1pdxo9R9

"6 turning, 4 burning"

1
lappedrider
Posts
1566
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Tooele, UT, USA
17 hours ago Edited Date/Time 14 hours ago

There is a lot of crazy speculation online about a possible refurbishment and return to service of a SR71 to use as a test bed for modern engines.  

Edit, just seeing the other thread making this old news.  

2
plowboy
Posts
14827
Joined
1/3/2010
Location
Norwich, KS, USA
13 hours ago
There is a lot of crazy speculation online about a possible refurbishment and return to service of a SR71 to use as a test bed for...

There is a lot of crazy speculation online about a possible refurbishment and return to service of a SR71 to use as a test bed for modern engines.  

Edit, just seeing the other thread making this old news.  

I honestly would have thought NASA would have pickled one for some future need to test something strapped to a really fast plane.  

Hell,  is there anyone left that can revive those avionics?

I only "worked" on an SR twice.  I didn't actually work on it.  I was called out to confirm a discrepancy on a Transinent bird.  Damn SP with an M16 at arms length all the time.  Almost as bad as AF1 or an old RC135.🙃

1
PRM31
Posts
3870
Joined
8/7/2009
Location
Northern, VA, USA
Fantasy
12 hours ago
G-man wrote:
Awesome Bomber for its day.The Convair B-36 Peacemaker was truly one of the great giants of the Cold War. With its enormous wingspan, six piston engines...

Awesome Bomber for its day.

The Convair B-36 Peacemaker was truly one of the great giants of the Cold War. With its enormous wingspan, six piston engines and later four additional jet engines, the B-36 looked almost unreal when it took to the sky. 

Compared with the sleek B-58 Hustler and the futuristic XB-70 Valkyrie, the Peacemaker represented a completely different approach to strategic air power. The B-58 was built around speed, while the XB-70 was designed to push toward Mach 3. The B-36 relied on something more fundamental: enormous size, long range, and the ability to carry a massive bomb load across continents. 

It may have been slower and older-looking than its supersonic successors, but for a time, the B-36 was quite simply the giant of America's Cold War skies.

1000018803.jpg?VersionId=uIWA6ZdQw3KZtXcWkBFiZe1pdxo9R9

Can you even imagine the maintenance man hours per flight hour on that beast! 

2
Sully
Posts
9597
Joined
8/24/2006
Location
JP
10 hours ago
G-man wrote:
Awesome Bomber for its day.The Convair B-36 Peacemaker was truly one of the great giants of the Cold War. With its enormous wingspan, six piston engines...

Awesome Bomber for its day.

The Convair B-36 Peacemaker was truly one of the great giants of the Cold War. With its enormous wingspan, six piston engines and later four additional jet engines, the B-36 looked almost unreal when it took to the sky. 

Compared with the sleek B-58 Hustler and the futuristic XB-70 Valkyrie, the Peacemaker represented a completely different approach to strategic air power. The B-58 was built around speed, while the XB-70 was designed to push toward Mach 3. The B-36 relied on something more fundamental: enormous size, long range, and the ability to carry a massive bomb load across continents. 

It may have been slower and older-looking than its supersonic successors, but for a time, the B-36 was quite simply the giant of America's Cold War skies.

1000018803.jpg?VersionId=uIWA6ZdQw3KZtXcWkBFiZe1pdxo9R9

Supposedly, there were only a handful of air fields they could fly the B36 into, because most runways weren't rated for an aircraft that heavy.

1
G-man
Posts
9423
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
10 hours ago
Sully wrote:

Supposedly, there were only a handful of air fields they could fly the B36 into, because most runways weren't rated for an aircraft that heavy.

WoW!! 😲

Here is another awesome aircraft, and the fact the belly pod contained fuel and also a bomb!!

Man stuff was wild back then.!!!! 😲

The B-58 was built for extreme speed. It had a very slim fuselage, a delta wing, and four jet engines in separate pods. That shape helped it reach Mach 2, but it also created a major problem: It had no normal internal bomb bay so Convairs solution was to carry the main weapon and extra fuel in a large streamlined pod under the fuselage.

The early pod was the MB-1C pod. This was a combined fuel-and-weapon pod. The forward section carried fuel, and the rear section carried a nuclear weapon. During a mission, the B-58 could use fuel from the pod to extend its range, then release the entire pod over the target.

1000018814
2

Post a reply to: Historic Aircraft from back in the day

The Latest