Supercross = not worth the $$

Jesse318NW
Posts
69
Joined
8/6/2010
Location
Snoqualmie, WA US
1/16/2011 7:39pm
I was at Phx and thought it was a good program but way too short. I used to pay to fly to go to races but would never dream of doing that these days.

I do not believe anyone at Feld has answered the question as to why they will not move towards timed main events. It just makes so much more sense in that every race would be the same so the schedule would be even more consistent and they wouldn't have to debate less laps in the mud.

The only reason I can think of is they are embarrassed to publish how few minutes fans will actually see the racers.
bultokid
Posts
2132
Joined
8/13/2007
Location
Houston, TX US
1/16/2011 7:43pm Edited Date/Time 1/16/2011 7:45pm
jmar wrote:
Let's just take the sport to the grass roots level, so no one will be intimidated. Rules are that it's outdoors only with no jumps, the...
Let's just take the sport to the grass roots level, so no one will be intimidated. Rules are that it's outdoors only with no jumps, the bikes have to be two strokes, and at least five year old beaters, and everyone will be required to wear old style JT gear.

That should fix everything.
bultokid wrote:
The one and only thing that SX 2011 has going for it better than SX 1981 is the presentation is more professional.
jmar wrote:
The sport is much more professional, and the caliber of the riders is much better.

No local yokels in supercross today.
I have to respectfully disagree. I agree it does look more professional but todays riders are in no way of higher caliber than the guys from then, more specialized in a different era sure but better ? no way. Same as Babe Ruth or Hank Aaron - both great, just different era's
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK US
1/16/2011 7:48pm
ktm764 wrote:
Between all the heat races and lcq's and main events for both classes...60.70 minutes worth of racing...what a joke. They really need to do something about...
Between all the heat races and lcq's and main events for both classes...60.70 minutes worth of racing...what a joke. They really need to do something about this rather it be longer heats? longer lcqs longer mains? or bring back semis. Its a 3 hour show that takes 1 hour so the ticket should be like 8 bucks. Like everyone else on here I will pay the money to go see it just because i'm a fan but give me outdoors anyday.
Like other sponsors, San Manual doesn't think they will get their monies worth supporting the outdoor series.

It's reality.
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK US
1/16/2011 7:56pm
bultokid wrote:
The one and only thing that SX 2011 has going for it better than SX 1981 is the presentation is more professional.
jmar wrote:
The sport is much more professional, and the caliber of the riders is much better.

No local yokels in supercross today.
bultokid wrote:
I have to respectfully disagree. I agree it does look more professional but todays riders are in no way of higher caliber than the guys from...
I have to respectfully disagree. I agree it does look more professional but todays riders are in no way of higher caliber than the guys from then, more specialized in a different era sure but better ? no way. Same as Babe Ruth or Hank Aaron - both great, just different era's
I can agree with that, but the reality is that todays riders are prepped from a much younger age, and in a much more professional manner.

I am not saying that it's a good thing. In fact, if I had it to do all over again, I would have handled things differently with my son. Starting them at a young age may be great for the amateur career. But by the time they are ready to peak as a pro, they are mentally burned out, and their bodies are beat to shit.

The Shop

bultokid
Posts
2132
Joined
8/13/2007
Location
Houston, TX US
1/16/2011 8:19pm
jmar wrote:
The sport is much more professional, and the caliber of the riders is much better.

No local yokels in supercross today.
bultokid wrote:
I have to respectfully disagree. I agree it does look more professional but todays riders are in no way of higher caliber than the guys from...
I have to respectfully disagree. I agree it does look more professional but todays riders are in no way of higher caliber than the guys from then, more specialized in a different era sure but better ? no way. Same as Babe Ruth or Hank Aaron - both great, just different era's
jmar wrote:
I can agree with that, but the reality is that todays riders are prepped from a much younger age, and in a much more professional manner...
I can agree with that, but the reality is that todays riders are prepped from a much younger age, and in a much more professional manner.

I am not saying that it's a good thing. In fact, if I had it to do all over again, I would have handled things differently with my son. Starting them at a young age may be great for the amateur career. But by the time they are ready to peak as a pro, they are mentally burned out, and their bodies are beat to shit.
I can see from your view with LL's, GNC, etc. point well taken. It does seem a lot of very talented kids are just done with it by 16-18, same thing I see in lot of youth sports these todays. Too much, too soon as most can only burn that candle for so long before mental/physical burnout hits.

If you don't mind me asking, when did your boy start and if I recall correctly he was giving it a go but does he still ride/race or on to other challenges ?
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL US
1/16/2011 8:20pm
Jesse318NW wrote:
I was at Phx and thought it was a good program but way too short. I used to pay to fly to go to races but...
I was at Phx and thought it was a good program but way too short. I used to pay to fly to go to races but would never dream of doing that these days.

I do not believe anyone at Feld has answered the question as to why they will not move towards timed main events. It just makes so much more sense in that every race would be the same so the schedule would be even more consistent and they wouldn't have to debate less laps in the mud.

The only reason I can think of is they are embarrassed to publish how few minutes fans will actually see the racers.
They won't do timed mains because you can't package it for TV properly

As stated earlier, SX is not packaged for you, jmar, myself or anyone on this forum, WE ARE THE MINORITY at a Supercross....REAL RACERS, are the minority.
Of the 30-40,000 people who go to a SX, how many do you think really race (or even ride) and how many do you think are there for the (*Insert voice of God here*) HIGH FLYING ACTION AND CRASHING OF SUPERCROSS?

Dude, you're a minority, trust me

So races are in laps because it's easier for average Jim-Bob to understand. It's a clear start and a clear finish. NASCAR is by laps, F1 is by laps, Saturday night dirt track is by laps and almost all racing is by laps.
Hell, the two moto system is to odd and difficult for Jim-Bob to understand....Jim-Bob doesn't understand why Jack Smithson won the final race, but Jimmy Twotits won the big trophy and something called an "overall," what the fuck is an "overall?" He won, Jim-Bob saw him cross the line of the last race first, but he didn't win? WTF??

This is why average Jim-Bob's don't go to Nationals or as many watch on TV, they don't get it.

Now, as to the length of "show"
If you show up at 6-7pm to see "the show," that's what you got, a 3 hour show
If you're a real racer and moto fan, you showed up at noon, waited for the gates to open and you watched every practice, changed seats a few times to check out different sections and how riders are doing them, you went through the pits during the "pit party" and you made a fucking day of it, drooling on the Monster chicks and feeling up all the other promotional babes.

So, if you show up at 6-7pm for the show, you got what you wanted...all you wanted
If you wanted more, you missed it, because it was available to you...a whole day of stuff and racing.
and that's your fault
1/16/2011 8:32pm
I wonder how many of the people that complain about lap times are in the stadium watching all the practices instead of out in the pits picking up swag/drooling over the Monster girls?
1/16/2011 8:37pm
SX better on TV, MX better in person, it's always been that way
AZ35
Posts
2912
Joined
6/1/2008
Location
Peoria, AZ US
Fantasy
1/16/2011 8:48pm Edited Date/Time 1/16/2011 8:54pm
flarider wrote:
They won't do timed mains because you can't package it for TV properly As stated earlier, SX is not packaged for you, jmar, myself or anyone...
They won't do timed mains because you can't package it for TV properly

As stated earlier, SX is not packaged for you, jmar, myself or anyone on this forum, WE ARE THE MINORITY at a Supercross....REAL RACERS, are the minority.
Of the 30-40,000 people who go to a SX, how many do you think really race (or even ride) and how many do you think are there for the (*Insert voice of God here*) HIGH FLYING ACTION AND CRASHING OF SUPERCROSS?

Dude, you're a minority, trust me

So races are in laps because it's easier for average Jim-Bob to understand. It's a clear start and a clear finish. NASCAR is by laps, F1 is by laps, Saturday night dirt track is by laps and almost all racing is by laps.
Hell, the two moto system is to odd and difficult for Jim-Bob to understand....Jim-Bob doesn't understand why Jack Smithson won the final race, but Jimmy Twotits won the big trophy and something called an "overall," what the fuck is an "overall?" He won, Jim-Bob saw him cross the line of the last race first, but he didn't win? WTF??

This is why average Jim-Bob's don't go to Nationals or as many watch on TV, they don't get it.

Now, as to the length of "show"
If you show up at 6-7pm to see "the show," that's what you got, a 3 hour show
If you're a real racer and moto fan, you showed up at noon, waited for the gates to open and you watched every practice, changed seats a few times to check out different sections and how riders are doing them, you went through the pits during the "pit party" and you made a fucking day of it, drooling on the Monster chicks and feeling up all the other promotional babes.

So, if you show up at 6-7pm for the show, you got what you wanted...all you wanted
If you wanted more, you missed it, because it was available to you...a whole day of stuff and racing.
and that's your fault
So true MX racers/riders are in the minority as to the target audience (which is a statement I agree with and the facts support).



True MX racers/riders will come early and watch practice and timed qualifying trails to get their money's worth for the cost to entertainment value (which I also agree with and support).



So for the majority audience that you mention above (which is the non-racer, non die hard fan), they obviously only show up for the night show so how many times do you think they will keep coming back to watch 5 minute qualifying races and 15 minute finals?



At best 60 minutes of action with 120 minutes of filler. Yes NFL has a similar actual play action to length ratio but it is in small segments, so the down time does not cause the casual fan to get bored.



Or to put it in another "majority" of the target audience perspective- they come to see the guy that is the "star" of the show (Stewart, Villo, Dungey, etc) and they get to see that "star" for about 20 minutes during a 3 hour show (20 minutes along with 19 other riders stealing the same 20 minutes).



Longer tracks, more qualifying races (semi's). Why is that too much to ask?



While I am dreaming, how about bringing back the KTM 50cc kids for some great entertainment during the long breaks between the actual racing?
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK US
1/16/2011 8:56pm
bultokid wrote:
I have to respectfully disagree. I agree it does look more professional but todays riders are in no way of higher caliber than the guys from...
I have to respectfully disagree. I agree it does look more professional but todays riders are in no way of higher caliber than the guys from then, more specialized in a different era sure but better ? no way. Same as Babe Ruth or Hank Aaron - both great, just different era's
jmar wrote:
I can agree with that, but the reality is that todays riders are prepped from a much younger age, and in a much more professional manner...
I can agree with that, but the reality is that todays riders are prepped from a much younger age, and in a much more professional manner.

I am not saying that it's a good thing. In fact, if I had it to do all over again, I would have handled things differently with my son. Starting them at a young age may be great for the amateur career. But by the time they are ready to peak as a pro, they are mentally burned out, and their bodies are beat to shit.
bultokid wrote:
I can see from your view with LL's, GNC, etc. point well taken. It does seem a lot of very talented kids are just done with...
I can see from your view with LL's, GNC, etc. point well taken. It does seem a lot of very talented kids are just done with it by 16-18, same thing I see in lot of youth sports these todays. Too much, too soon as most can only burn that candle for so long before mental/physical burnout hits.

If you don't mind me asking, when did your boy start and if I recall correctly he was giving it a go but does he still ride/race or on to other challenges ?
He started racing at a national level at age 4. Very stellar amateur career, lot's of wins at a national level. He was in Suzuki's amature program from the age of 13 until he was 18. Turned pro in the late 90s, but injuries came one after another. Multiple arthroscopic shoulder surgery's. Three total Bankart shoulder surgery's. Mutable arthroscopic (to get him through the next race) knee surgery's and three ACLs, along with two broken wrist.

My sons body was worn out, and he had been at a race track on almost a daily basis for almost twenty years before he decided to hang up his boots. He was mentally burned out.

As of today, he doesn't ride. I am sure that one day he may be able to enjoy riding for fun, but he isn't at that point right now. He's very busy with his family, and he has a very good job that takes a good part of his time.

The thing that makes me the most proud of my son isn't his racing career. It's the fact that he has a great work ethic, and has done very well for him self in the real world that the rest of us live in.
mhpopp
Posts
13
Joined
11/19/2010
Location
Kennewick, WA US
1/16/2011 9:04pm
I dont disagree. But football is no different, 60 minutes of actual playing time which actually takes several hours. Im just sayin....
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL US
1/16/2011 9:04pm
AZ35 wrote:
So true MX racers/riders are in the minority as to the target audience (which is a statement I agree with and the facts support). True MX...
So true MX racers/riders are in the minority as to the target audience (which is a statement I agree with and the facts support).



True MX racers/riders will come early and watch practice and timed qualifying trails to get their money's worth for the cost to entertainment value (which I also agree with and support).



So for the majority audience that you mention above (which is the non-racer, non die hard fan), they obviously only show up for the night show so how many times do you think they will keep coming back to watch 5 minute qualifying races and 15 minute finals?



At best 60 minutes of action with 120 minutes of filler. Yes NFL has a similar actual play action to length ratio but it is in small segments, so the down time does not cause the casual fan to get bored.



Or to put it in another "majority" of the target audience perspective- they come to see the guy that is the "star" of the show (Stewart, Villo, Dungey, etc) and they get to see that "star" for about 20 minutes during a 3 hour show (20 minutes along with 19 other riders stealing the same 20 minutes).



Longer tracks, more qualifying races (semi's). Why is that too much to ask?



While I am dreaming, how about bringing back the KTM 50cc kids for some great entertainment during the long breaks between the actual racing?
If they enjoy "the show," they'll come back.
They don't know 15 laps from 20 laps.
They want to see racing and more importantly, riders eating shit.

Want to kill the show so they don't return?
Make races 25 or 30 laps where everyone will play follow the leader or someone like RV, JS, RD, TC or CR runaway and make the race a complete yawner where everyone except the top 5 are lapped and then make tracks so easy no one crashes.

You're dealing with a monster truck audience, they want beer, loud noises, yelling, screaming, fireworks and the potential of death.

The sooner everyone comes to grips with the fact the a Supercross is A SHOW, interspersed with racing, the better you'll be.

People like the goofy t-shirt shooting, sumo race, freestyle or whatever crap they throw in between the races, because that is part of "the show"

Next time you go, step back and look at it from a blank slate point of view...where you know nothing, no riders, no teams and you're there to bring your boy or family to see an "exciting show"...it makes it all a little easier to understand
carson510
Posts
90
Joined
1/15/2011
Location
Orofino, ID US
1/16/2011 9:11pm
eh. it gives me something to watch during the winter when I can't ride the dirt scooter here. Never been to one live, I may try to catch the one in Seattle this year.
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK US
1/16/2011 9:13pm
AZ35 wrote:
So true MX racers/riders are in the minority as to the target audience (which is a statement I agree with and the facts support). True MX...
So true MX racers/riders are in the minority as to the target audience (which is a statement I agree with and the facts support).



True MX racers/riders will come early and watch practice and timed qualifying trails to get their money's worth for the cost to entertainment value (which I also agree with and support).



So for the majority audience that you mention above (which is the non-racer, non die hard fan), they obviously only show up for the night show so how many times do you think they will keep coming back to watch 5 minute qualifying races and 15 minute finals?



At best 60 minutes of action with 120 minutes of filler. Yes NFL has a similar actual play action to length ratio but it is in small segments, so the down time does not cause the casual fan to get bored.



Or to put it in another "majority" of the target audience perspective- they come to see the guy that is the "star" of the show (Stewart, Villo, Dungey, etc) and they get to see that "star" for about 20 minutes during a 3 hour show (20 minutes along with 19 other riders stealing the same 20 minutes).



Longer tracks, more qualifying races (semi's). Why is that too much to ask?



While I am dreaming, how about bringing back the KTM 50cc kids for some great entertainment during the long breaks between the actual racing?
flarider wrote:
If they enjoy "the show," they'll come back. They don't know 15 laps from 20 laps. They want to see racing and more importantly, riders eating...
If they enjoy "the show," they'll come back.
They don't know 15 laps from 20 laps.
They want to see racing and more importantly, riders eating shit.

Want to kill the show so they don't return?
Make races 25 or 30 laps where everyone will play follow the leader or someone like RV, JS, RD, TC or CR runaway and make the race a complete yawner where everyone except the top 5 are lapped and then make tracks so easy no one crashes.

You're dealing with a monster truck audience, they want beer, loud noises, yelling, screaming, fireworks and the potential of death.

The sooner everyone comes to grips with the fact the a Supercross is A SHOW, interspersed with racing, the better you'll be.

People like the goofy t-shirt shooting, sumo race, freestyle or whatever crap they throw in between the races, because that is part of "the show"

Next time you go, step back and look at it from a blank slate point of view...where you know nothing, no riders, no teams and you're there to bring your boy or family to see an "exciting show"...it makes it all a little easier to understand
Dave

You are 100% on everything you said. The one point that you didn't make is that Suprecross is what pays the bills.
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
1/16/2011 9:13pm
calimxer91 wrote:
.
So say the sport grows so much that there are 40,000 fans at each National. Give me your estimate about how long the lines in and out of each venue will be?

I'm guessing you'd also be first in line to say, "Who are all these people? They're obviously not core enough to be here."
Brent
Posts
5802
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Party in Temecula, CA US
1/16/2011 9:19pm Edited Date/Time 1/16/2011 9:21pm
Im Just bored with Supercross. Same track re done 5 different ways, same triple, corner, whoops, Etc. in a different spot every week.

Same guys finish at the top, Stewart, RV, Dungey, Reed - Next week it's RV, Reed Stewart, Dungey. Take the same boring podium speech,sounds the same no matter who's mouth it comes out of - I'd like to thank__________. It's like the movie Groundhog Day, week in week out. Even the friggin TV commercials are the same year after year after year...

I've been in this sport my entire adult life, and I can't remember Supercross ever being this vanilla before.
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK US
1/16/2011 9:19pm
ktm764 wrote:
Between all the heat races and lcq's and main events for both classes...60.70 minutes worth of racing...what a joke. They really need to do something about...
Between all the heat races and lcq's and main events for both classes...60.70 minutes worth of racing...what a joke. They really need to do something about this rather it be longer heats? longer lcqs longer mains? or bring back semis. Its a 3 hour show that takes 1 hour so the ticket should be like 8 bucks. Like everyone else on here I will pay the money to go see it just because i'm a fan but give me outdoors anyday.
No, San Manuel invested their money in the supercross series. JSE was the one who made the mistake of showing up at Unadilla.

AZ35
Posts
2912
Joined
6/1/2008
Location
Peoria, AZ US
Fantasy
1/16/2011 9:21pm
AZ35 wrote:
So true MX racers/riders are in the minority as to the target audience (which is a statement I agree with and the facts support). True MX...
So true MX racers/riders are in the minority as to the target audience (which is a statement I agree with and the facts support).



True MX racers/riders will come early and watch practice and timed qualifying trails to get their money's worth for the cost to entertainment value (which I also agree with and support).



So for the majority audience that you mention above (which is the non-racer, non die hard fan), they obviously only show up for the night show so how many times do you think they will keep coming back to watch 5 minute qualifying races and 15 minute finals?



At best 60 minutes of action with 120 minutes of filler. Yes NFL has a similar actual play action to length ratio but it is in small segments, so the down time does not cause the casual fan to get bored.



Or to put it in another "majority" of the target audience perspective- they come to see the guy that is the "star" of the show (Stewart, Villo, Dungey, etc) and they get to see that "star" for about 20 minutes during a 3 hour show (20 minutes along with 19 other riders stealing the same 20 minutes).



Longer tracks, more qualifying races (semi's). Why is that too much to ask?



While I am dreaming, how about bringing back the KTM 50cc kids for some great entertainment during the long breaks between the actual racing?
flarider wrote:
If they enjoy "the show," they'll come back. They don't know 15 laps from 20 laps. They want to see racing and more importantly, riders eating...
If they enjoy "the show," they'll come back.
They don't know 15 laps from 20 laps.
They want to see racing and more importantly, riders eating shit.

Want to kill the show so they don't return?
Make races 25 or 30 laps where everyone will play follow the leader or someone like RV, JS, RD, TC or CR runaway and make the race a complete yawner where everyone except the top 5 are lapped and then make tracks so easy no one crashes.

You're dealing with a monster truck audience, they want beer, loud noises, yelling, screaming, fireworks and the potential of death.

The sooner everyone comes to grips with the fact the a Supercross is A SHOW, interspersed with racing, the better you'll be.

People like the goofy t-shirt shooting, sumo race, freestyle or whatever crap they throw in between the races, because that is part of "the show"

Next time you go, step back and look at it from a blank slate point of view...where you know nothing, no riders, no teams and you're there to bring your boy or family to see an "exciting show"...it makes it all a little easier to understand
I agree with everything you posted.

It is not about 15 or 20 laps, it is about entertainment and action.

With 50 second lap times, at about the time the casual fan begins to understand who is winning or trying to pass for the win- and starting to cheer for the guy charging from behind- the race is over.

Not more laps, not timed races. Just slow the shit down. Add more obstacles and turns.

Semi's were the best qualifying idea, but I guess that does not fit into the TV program because it is actual racing and not fluff bullshit.
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK US
1/16/2011 9:29pm
calimxer91 wrote:
.
GuyB wrote:
So say the sport grows so much that there are 40,000 fans at each National. Give me your estimate about how long the lines in and...
So say the sport grows so much that there are 40,000 fans at each National. Give me your estimate about how long the lines in and out of each venue will be?

I'm guessing you'd also be first in line to say, "Who are all these people? They're obviously not core enough to be here."
Back east, some of the biggest willy billies ever attend the outdoor nationals. They are in a drunken stupor from early morning, until they pass out, or the races get over. I use to hate going to Troy. It was one of the worse.

This is one of the reasons sponsors are not inclined to invest money into this series.
mxb2
Posts
22437
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD US
1/16/2011 9:32pm
True, i think some people come to the races to get out of the house and have no clue who any of the riders or anything about the sport! Just another reason to get drunk!
andymoto
Posts
4771
Joined
11/28/2007
Location
Carmichael, CA US
1/16/2011 9:51pm
Seems to me SX tracks have shrunk over the years due to a smaller stadium floor that the promoter has to work with due to insurance requirements I believe.
The power of these 450s and 250s also contribute to faster laps than the old 250/125 2 strokes.
tobz
Posts
3891
Joined
3/5/2007
Location
Adelaide AU
1/16/2011 10:11pm
ktm764 wrote:
Its a 3 hour live show..
Sorry, the torrent i d/l goes for 2. Smile
RaceFace
Posts
1608
Joined
8/15/2010
Location
US
1/16/2011 10:56pm
calimxer91 wrote:
.
jmar wrote:
With out supercross, there would be no race team budgets for the outdoors.
calimxer91 wrote:
.
But they have firework explosions on the start and at the checkers! That's growth!
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK US
1/16/2011 11:00pm
jmar wrote:
With out supercross, there would be no race team budgets for the outdoors.
calimxer91 wrote:
.
RaceFace wrote:
But they have firework explosions on the start and at the checkers! That's growth!
It's got nothing to do with fireworks. It has to do with demographics, and sponsors that are willing to invest their money into the series.

Fat Fingers
Posts
857
Joined
7/18/2009
Location
Auckland NZ
1/17/2011 1:35am
If you think its to expensive, don't go.

I wouldn't want a race to go on any longer than 20 laps - it would send most people to sleep.

If the main event had been 25 laps in Phoenix, the result would have been the same.

FlaNard
Posts
3620
Joined
10/13/2009
Location
Layton, UT US
1/17/2011 2:44am
ktm764 wrote:
Between all the heat races and lcq's and main events for both classes...60.70 minutes worth of racing...what a joke. They really need to do something about...
Between all the heat races and lcq's and main events for both classes...60.70 minutes worth of racing...what a joke. They really need to do something about this rather it be longer heats? longer lcqs longer mains? or bring back semis. Its a 3 hour show that takes 1 hour so the ticket should be like 8 bucks. Like everyone else on here I will pay the money to go see it just because i'm a fan but give me outdoors anyday.
I went to Salt Lake and Vegas every year for a long assed time (well, SLC whenever it was on the list) but I stopped going years ago. Its pathetic now. If you want more bang for your buck, go to a National. But even those are cutting down on the amount of moto you get to see. So go to a National ASAP before it turns into an outdoor Supercross. Cause its heading that way.
FlaNard
Posts
3620
Joined
10/13/2009
Location
Layton, UT US
1/17/2011 2:57am Edited Date/Time 1/17/2011 2:59am
Oh, and I am BEYOND sick of hearing "Its not for you" from half of you guys. Guess what? Turning motocross into a sport where the stands are nothing but spectators and not riders KILLS IT. Nascar seems to be the model that you all live off of. What is good for tv is good for the sport right? Who cares if they sell bikes right? Well, Nascar is losing cash big time right now. With more fans unwilling to pay such a high price to see the sport they love, the attendance WILL go down. How long do you think randoms will pay big bucks to go see a shorter and shorter race just because it can fit onto live tv? You guys are off your nut. The "Shit hun, there isnt anything else going on tonight. How bout we go see that Supercross thing?" fans will get wise and move on to something that provides more bang for your buck. And the core fans (you know, who actually buy the bikes and gear and show up to the local races that some of you seem to think mean nothing in the grand scheme of things) wont be there to pick up the slack. Its only a matter of time. Some of you are so blind about this its stunning. But hey, I see a whole lot of "Defend the status quo at all costs" from the same guys spouting off about 10 minute Supercrosses not being a problem because its just bitchen for tv. So maybe I shouldnt be surprised.
RIDE
Posts
22
Joined
1/12/2011
Location
Coeur D Alene Spokane, ID US
1/17/2011 3:33am
jmar wrote:
Longer mains would do nothing but get more people hurt in supercross. Think about your logic the next time you are at a hot dusty outdoor...
Longer mains would do nothing but get more people hurt in supercross.

Think about your logic the next time you are at a hot dusty outdoor national, siting around an entire day waiting for the next 30min + 2 lap race, in the middle of nowhere, where you have to pick a turn or section, and you only see a very small part of the track.
Are you nuts. Ive been to Glen Helen and Hangtown and you can see 80-90 percent of the track. Supercross is just a circus show.
themrtoad
Posts
1239
Joined
5/29/2009
Location
SE
1/17/2011 3:52am
FlaNard wrote:
Oh, and I am BEYOND sick of hearing "Its not for you" from half of you guys. Guess what? Turning motocross into a sport where the...
Oh, and I am BEYOND sick of hearing "Its not for you" from half of you guys. Guess what? Turning motocross into a sport where the stands are nothing but spectators and not riders KILLS IT. Nascar seems to be the model that you all live off of. What is good for tv is good for the sport right? Who cares if they sell bikes right? Well, Nascar is losing cash big time right now. With more fans unwilling to pay such a high price to see the sport they love, the attendance WILL go down. How long do you think randoms will pay big bucks to go see a shorter and shorter race just because it can fit onto live tv? You guys are off your nut. The "Shit hun, there isnt anything else going on tonight. How bout we go see that Supercross thing?" fans will get wise and move on to something that provides more bang for your buck. And the core fans (you know, who actually buy the bikes and gear and show up to the local races that some of you seem to think mean nothing in the grand scheme of things) wont be there to pick up the slack. Its only a matter of time. Some of you are so blind about this its stunning. But hey, I see a whole lot of "Defend the status quo at all costs" from the same guys spouting off about 10 minute Supercrosses not being a problem because its just bitchen for tv. So maybe I shouldnt be surprised.
I tend to agree with you on most subjects and this one as well.

SX can exist on the same logic as Nascar. However when you twist and turn the rules and formats for a sport to fit tv and spectators that's not really into it from the beginning, you loose the hardcore fans. I belive the competition between lot's of sports over the same money is razorsharp. Small sports are sometimes reday to change almoist everything in a small amount of time to get the money. I'm sure everyone that runs a business wanna do profit, so you can't really blame someone because of it.

I do however belive that sometimes it's better to stay calm and not reinvent the sport over and over again. It's shortsighted and it might comeback and punish them. When the wind turns and it's suddenly really cool to work with sports that stayed the same supercross and motocross are really small sports without active riders and hardcore fans. I think a good strategy would be to say what is actually good with our sports they way they were. Tell the market mx and sx has a wida fanbase consisting of people who have decent jobs and money to spend. I figure a lot of the active riders or their familys have their own company etc.

Monster/Redbull etc can change their marketing plans tomorrow and they would do so without feeling sad for motocross. It's in the interest of the sport that at least 75% of the income comes from companys who is dependent on a healthy mx-scene on the grassrootlevel IMO
Indy mxer
Posts
1831
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
The Villages, FL US
1/17/2011 4:09am
Jesse318NW wrote:
I was at Phx and thought it was a good program but way too short. I used to pay to fly to go to races but...
I was at Phx and thought it was a good program but way too short. I used to pay to fly to go to races but would never dream of doing that these days.

I do not believe anyone at Feld has answered the question as to why they will not move towards timed main events. It just makes so much more sense in that every race would be the same so the schedule would be even more consistent and they wouldn't have to debate less laps in the mud.

The only reason I can think of is they are embarrassed to publish how few minutes fans will actually see the racers.
flarider wrote:
They won't do timed mains because you can't package it for TV properly As stated earlier, SX is not packaged for you, jmar, myself or anyone...
They won't do timed mains because you can't package it for TV properly

As stated earlier, SX is not packaged for you, jmar, myself or anyone on this forum, WE ARE THE MINORITY at a Supercross....REAL RACERS, are the minority.
Of the 30-40,000 people who go to a SX, how many do you think really race (or even ride) and how many do you think are there for the (*Insert voice of God here*) HIGH FLYING ACTION AND CRASHING OF SUPERCROSS?

Dude, you're a minority, trust me

So races are in laps because it's easier for average Jim-Bob to understand. It's a clear start and a clear finish. NASCAR is by laps, F1 is by laps, Saturday night dirt track is by laps and almost all racing is by laps.
Hell, the two moto system is to odd and difficult for Jim-Bob to understand....Jim-Bob doesn't understand why Jack Smithson won the final race, but Jimmy Twotits won the big trophy and something called an "overall," what the fuck is an "overall?" He won, Jim-Bob saw him cross the line of the last race first, but he didn't win? WTF??

This is why average Jim-Bob's don't go to Nationals or as many watch on TV, they don't get it.

Now, as to the length of "show"
If you show up at 6-7pm to see "the show," that's what you got, a 3 hour show
If you're a real racer and moto fan, you showed up at noon, waited for the gates to open and you watched every practice, changed seats a few times to check out different sections and how riders are doing them, you went through the pits during the "pit party" and you made a fucking day of it, drooling on the Monster chicks and feeling up all the other promotional babes.

So, if you show up at 6-7pm for the show, you got what you wanted...all you wanted
If you wanted more, you missed it, because it was available to you...a whole day of stuff and racing.
and that's your fault
Very well put Flarider.
I agree, they know they have us no matter what. As you said, we're not the target audience.

Btw, NFL games are 60 minutes. Hows that working out for them?

That said, I would like to see the lap times a little longer.
A lap or 2 more in tthe LCQ wouldn't hurt either. It seems like those end just when the battles really heat up.

Post a reply to: Supercross = not worth the $$

The Latest