Epstein list incoming today

soggy
Posts
8983
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
8/1/2025 3:42pm

Trump could piss on there head and say it’s raining and they’d not only agree they’d collect it to drink later. 

7
3
lappedrider
Posts
1561
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Tooele, UT, USA
8/1/2025 3:50pm

I was hoping for better. 

Removing the fact that he was impeached from the Smithsonian… firing the head labor statistics over not liking reality…..   

it’s just getting worse.  

6
1
TheGreat
Posts
157
Joined
3/26/2025
Location
Lincoln, NE, USA
8/1/2025 4:39pm
I was hoping for better. Removing the fact that he was impeached from the Smithsonian… firing the head labor statistics over not liking reality…..   it’s just getting...

I was hoping for better. 

Removing the fact that he was impeached from the Smithsonian… firing the head labor statistics over not liking reality…..   

it’s just getting worse.  

"doing exactly what i voted for!!!!111" - vitards

4
2
TheGreat
Posts
157
Joined
3/26/2025
Location
Lincoln, NE, USA
8/1/2025 7:58pm

the important things

image 1915
2
2

The Shop

8/2/2025 12:10pm
I was hoping for better. Removing the fact that he was impeached from the Smithsonian… firing the head labor statistics over not liking reality…..   it’s just getting...

I was hoping for better. 

Removing the fact that he was impeached from the Smithsonian… firing the head labor statistics over not liking reality…..   

it’s just getting worse.  

TheGreat wrote:

"doing exactly what i voted for!!!!111" - vitards

Like we even care about the head of labor stats.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads.

13
soggy
Posts
8983
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
8/2/2025 1:53pm
I was hoping for better. Removing the fact that he was impeached from the Smithsonian… firing the head labor statistics over not liking reality…..   it’s just getting...

I was hoping for better. 

Removing the fact that he was impeached from the Smithsonian… firing the head labor statistics over not liking reality…..   

it’s just getting worse.  

TheGreat wrote:

"doing exactly what i voted for!!!!111" - vitards

Like we even care about the head of labor stats.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads.

You don’t care if accurate reporting on jobs or unemployment happens? That adds up. 

4
1
Kenny Banyan
Posts
4673
Joined
6/2/2024
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
8/2/2025 2:50pm
I was hoping for better. Removing the fact that he was impeached from the Smithsonian… firing the head labor statistics over not liking reality…..   it’s just getting...

I was hoping for better. 

Removing the fact that he was impeached from the Smithsonian… firing the head labor statistics over not liking reality…..   

it’s just getting worse.  

TheGreat wrote:

"doing exactly what i voted for!!!!111" - vitards

Like we even care about the head of labor stats.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads.

IMG 6071 1IMG 6072 0.jpeg?VersionId=IWUKeLxWSFmsOrjRe0InqHM5aIMG 6073 2IMG 6074 3.jpeg?VersionId=DRllF
4
M8
Posts
154
Joined
11/13/2020
Location
OG, AU
8/2/2025 3:18pm
TheGreat wrote:

"doing exactly what i voted for!!!!111" - vitards

Like we even care about the head of labor stats.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads.

IMG 6071 1IMG 6072 0.jpeg?VersionId=IWUKeLxWSFmsOrjRe0InqHM5aIMG 6073 2IMG 6074 3.jpeg?VersionId=DRllF

If it doesn’t come from trumps mouth, it doesn’t matter..

Cult.

6
MPJC
Posts
2083
Joined
5/18/2017
Location
CA
Fantasy
8/2/2025 5:44pm
TheGreat wrote:

"doing exactly what i voted for!!!!111" - vitards

Like we even care about the head of labor stats.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads.

IMG 6071 1IMG 6072 0.jpeg?VersionId=IWUKeLxWSFmsOrjRe0InqHM5aIMG 6073 2IMG 6074 3.jpeg?VersionId=DRllF

I took Luke’s post to be saying he doesn’t care who’s in charge of reporting labor statistics, not that he doesn’t care about labor statistics (e.g. he’d be as concerned as anyone if unemployment skyrocketed). 

Apparently, Trump cares about who’s in charge of labor statistics. Sounds a bit like blaming the messenger. I wonder what, if any, evidence there is that she did a bad job. 

1
Kenny Banyan
Posts
4673
Joined
6/2/2024
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
8/2/2025 6:07pm Edited Date/Time 8/2/2025 8:38pm

Like we even care about the head of labor stats.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads.

IMG 6071 1IMG 6072 0.jpeg?VersionId=IWUKeLxWSFmsOrjRe0InqHM5aIMG 6073 2IMG 6074 3.jpeg?VersionId=DRllF
MPJC wrote:
I took Luke’s post to be saying he doesn’t care who’s in charge of reporting labor statistics, not that he doesn’t care about labor statistics (e.g...

I took Luke’s post to be saying he doesn’t care who’s in charge of reporting labor statistics, not that he doesn’t care about labor statistics (e.g. he’d be as concerned as anyone if unemployment skyrocketed). 

Apparently, Trump cares about who’s in charge of labor statistics. Sounds a bit like blaming the messenger. I wonder what, if any, evidence there is that she did a bad job. 

Well that’s how I took it as well. My point in posting what did, is to show that it’s an extremely important job because it can affect the economy and various other things if the reporting is not accurate. 

2
burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA, USA
8/2/2025 6:10pm Edited Date/Time 8/2/2025 6:11pm
LungButter wrote:
I love the irony in posts like this..... it's wild that some of ya'll can't see that you are the pot calling the kettle black.So you...

I love the irony in posts like this..... it's wild that some of ya'll can't see that you are the pot calling the kettle black.

So you shit on soggy for watching CNN but I'm sure you take Fox News as the gospel truth right?

You say Soggy doesn't care about the real truth on the Epstein shit....where I'm sitting the Trump Dick Suckers don't either....ya'll are literally ok with your Daddy Donald protecting a bunch of folks who fucked kids just because Daddy Donald told you not to worry about it.

You ain't any better than the folks you disagree with man....you are just as fucking brainwashed as they are....how the fuck can some of you not see that?

America is absolutely FUCKED because of this.  Some of you need to wake the fuck up and think for yourselves instead of just being dumb fucks that worship politicians.

Fox News? Fox news is utter complete garbage. You know that. They only report on fluff stories that don’t matter. Yeah, soggy onmxguy are just plain Trump haters. There’s nothing there and they don’t really have anything else.

Please tell me you’re not defending CNN. I know you’re smarter than that.

 

1
6
soggy
Posts
8983
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
8/2/2025 7:06pm
LungButter wrote:
I love the irony in posts like this..... it's wild that some of ya'll can't see that you are the pot calling the kettle black.So you...

I love the irony in posts like this..... it's wild that some of ya'll can't see that you are the pot calling the kettle black.

So you shit on soggy for watching CNN but I'm sure you take Fox News as the gospel truth right?

You say Soggy doesn't care about the real truth on the Epstein shit....where I'm sitting the Trump Dick Suckers don't either....ya'll are literally ok with your Daddy Donald protecting a bunch of folks who fucked kids just because Daddy Donald told you not to worry about it.

You ain't any better than the folks you disagree with man....you are just as fucking brainwashed as they are....how the fuck can some of you not see that?

America is absolutely FUCKED because of this.  Some of you need to wake the fuck up and think for yourselves instead of just being dumb fucks that worship politicians.

burn1986 wrote:
Fox News? Fox news is utter complete garbage. You know that. They only report on fluff stories that don’t matter. Yeah, soggy onmxguy are just plain...

Fox News? Fox news is utter complete garbage. You know that. They only report on fluff stories that don’t matter. Yeah, soggy onmxguy are just plain Trump haters. There’s nothing there and they don’t really have anything else.

Please tell me you’re not defending CNN. I know you’re smarter than that.

 

Oh god. Does this mean you watch newsmax? OAN?  

trump fired this person who I don’t know from a whole in the wall and that doesn’t matter. What matters is he fired her because he didn’t like the answers she gave because he can’t use it to control his delusional narrative. 

 

4
2
whethefakawe
Posts
254
Joined
10/14/2021
Location
Scottsdale, AZ, USA
8/2/2025 7:15pm

Okay let’s have one. First answer this super easy question then we can start.

Who legitimately won the 2020 US Presidential Election?

Nobody.

US elections are rigged wiith massive mail-in voting scams. Until that is limited to overseas military and verified home-bound individuals, voting will be a farce. 

Does that answer your stupid, one-track question?  

3
7
TheGreat
Posts
157
Joined
3/26/2025
Location
Lincoln, NE, USA
8/2/2025 7:50pm
1754079367582
6
8/2/2025 8:25pm
TheGreat wrote:

"doing exactly what i voted for!!!!111" - vitards

Like we even care about the head of labor stats.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads.

soggy wrote:

You don’t care if accurate reporting on jobs or unemployment happens? That adds up. 

ESL?

2
8/2/2025 8:26pm

Okay let’s have one. First answer this super easy question then we can start.

Who legitimately won the 2020 US Presidential Election?

Nobody.US elections are rigged wiith massive mail-in voting scams. Until that is limited to overseas military and verified home-bound individuals, voting will be a farce. Does that...

Nobody.

US elections are rigged wiith massive mail-in voting scams. Until that is limited to overseas military and verified home-bound individuals, voting will be a farce. 

Does that answer your stupid, one-track question?  

I think ono hombre is on the spectrum.....true story.

 

1
4
JM485
Posts
5824
Joined
10/1/2013
Location
Davis, CA, USA
8/2/2025 10:50pm

Like we even care about the head of labor stats.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads.

IMG 6071 1IMG 6072 0.jpeg?VersionId=IWUKeLxWSFmsOrjRe0InqHM5aIMG 6073 2IMG 6074 3.jpeg?VersionId=DRllF
MPJC wrote:
I took Luke’s post to be saying he doesn’t care who’s in charge of reporting labor statistics, not that he doesn’t care about labor statistics (e.g...

I took Luke’s post to be saying he doesn’t care who’s in charge of reporting labor statistics, not that he doesn’t care about labor statistics (e.g. he’d be as concerned as anyone if unemployment skyrocketed). 

Apparently, Trump cares about who’s in charge of labor statistics. Sounds a bit like blaming the messenger. I wonder what, if any, evidence there is that she did a bad job. 

In this case I will back up Trump's decision, there have been multiple threads on it over the past few years but the level of "revisions" that needed to be done to the initially reported jobs numbers were almost comical.  Essentially the labor statistics would be reported, the market would react, then months later when the real data came in (rather than the predictions that were used in the initial reporting) the changes would be so astronomical that they painted an entirely different economic picture than what was initially reported.  By this time the media and market had long since moved on though, and it was largely ignored.  

 

Now, whether this was intentional or whether this was just pure incompetence is up for debate.  The more cynical among us (myself included) believed that these number were intentionally misreported initially to show a stronger economy than what truly existed, but that's pure speculation.

2
2
MPJC
Posts
2083
Joined
5/18/2017
Location
CA
Fantasy
8/3/2025 12:22am
IMG 6071 1IMG 6072 0.jpeg?VersionId=IWUKeLxWSFmsOrjRe0InqHM5aIMG 6073 2IMG 6074 3.jpeg?VersionId=DRllF
MPJC wrote:
I took Luke’s post to be saying he doesn’t care who’s in charge of reporting labor statistics, not that he doesn’t care about labor statistics (e.g...

I took Luke’s post to be saying he doesn’t care who’s in charge of reporting labor statistics, not that he doesn’t care about labor statistics (e.g. he’d be as concerned as anyone if unemployment skyrocketed). 

Apparently, Trump cares about who’s in charge of labor statistics. Sounds a bit like blaming the messenger. I wonder what, if any, evidence there is that she did a bad job. 

JM485 wrote:
In this case I will back up Trump's decision, there have been multiple threads on it over the past few years but the level of "revisions"...

In this case I will back up Trump's decision, there have been multiple threads on it over the past few years but the level of "revisions" that needed to be done to the initially reported jobs numbers were almost comical.  Essentially the labor statistics would be reported, the market would react, then months later when the real data came in (rather than the predictions that were used in the initial reporting) the changes would be so astronomical that they painted an entirely different economic picture than what was initially reported.  By this time the media and market had long since moved on though, and it was largely ignored.  

 

Now, whether this was intentional or whether this was just pure incompetence is up for debate.  The more cynical among us (myself included) believed that these number were intentionally misreported initially to show a stronger economy than what truly existed, but that's pure speculation.

That’s quite informative. Thanks for that. 

2
8/3/2025 2:44am
JM485 wrote:
In this case I will back up Trump's decision, there have been multiple threads on it over the past few years but the level of "revisions"...

In this case I will back up Trump's decision, there have been multiple threads on it over the past few years but the level of "revisions" that needed to be done to the initially reported jobs numbers were almost comical.  Essentially the labor statistics would be reported, the market would react, then months later when the real data came in (rather than the predictions that were used in the initial reporting) the changes would be so astronomical that they painted an entirely different economic picture than what was initially reported.  By this time the media and market had long since moved on though, and it was largely ignored.  

 

Now, whether this was intentional or whether this was just pure incompetence is up for debate.  The more cynical among us (myself included) believed that these number were intentionally misreported initially to show a stronger economy than what truly existed, but that's pure speculation.

I don’t understand why he didn’t fire her right after getting back into office. 

2
1
8/3/2025 4:36am
JM485 wrote:
In this case I will back up Trump's decision, there have been multiple threads on it over the past few years but the level of "revisions"...

In this case I will back up Trump's decision, there have been multiple threads on it over the past few years but the level of "revisions" that needed to be done to the initially reported jobs numbers were almost comical.  Essentially the labor statistics would be reported, the market would react, then months later when the real data came in (rather than the predictions that were used in the initial reporting) the changes would be so astronomical that they painted an entirely different economic picture than what was initially reported.  By this time the media and market had long since moved on though, and it was largely ignored.  

 

Now, whether this was intentional or whether this was just pure incompetence is up for debate.  The more cynical among us (myself included) believed that these number were intentionally misreported initially to show a stronger economy than what truly existed, but that's pure speculation.

I don’t understand why he didn’t fire her right after getting back into office. 

What is your most obscure product in HA? : r/homeassistant

2
1
8/3/2025 5:50pm Edited Date/Time 8/3/2025 5:50pm

I'm typing this slow, because I know some of the libby Demorots do not read very fast.

I'll try to explain it so even you can understand it.

==============================================

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads. ~ you vitards get into hysterics over anything Trump. (We are in a cult, sure......if that let's you sleep at night.)

And where is your Epstein lists? Trump still on it?

3
8/3/2025 6:03pm
I'm typing this slow, because I know some of the libby Demorots do not read very fast.I'll try to explain it so even you can understand...

I'm typing this slow, because I know some of the libby Demorots do not read very fast.

I'll try to explain it so even you can understand it.

==============================================

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads. ~ you vitards get into hysterics over anything Trump. (We are in a cult, sure......if that let's you sleep at night.)

And where is your Epstein lists? Trump still on it?

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.

If the numbers were falsified, and the head was sacked, the markets will lose confidence in the historical numbers, confidence will need to be rebuilt for trust in future numbers.

If the numbers were accurate, and the head was sacked for political reasons, the markets will lose confidence in future numbers.

Either way the markets will not be happy.

"And where is your Epstein lists?"

Good question, has the President issued a Presidential order releasing the files yet, if not, why?

look over there 2.gif?VersionId=0wHPnVFF2edFIR17fHayXMmNH4JDTz8
5
2
burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA, USA
8/3/2025 6:18pm
"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.If the numbers...

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.

If the numbers were falsified, and the head was sacked, the markets will lose confidence in the historical numbers, confidence will need to be rebuilt for trust in future numbers.

If the numbers were accurate, and the head was sacked for political reasons, the markets will lose confidence in future numbers.

Either way the markets will not be happy.

"And where is your Epstein lists?"

Good question, has the President issued a Presidential order releasing the files yet, if not, why?

look over there 2.gif?VersionId=0wHPnVFF2edFIR17fHayXMmNH4JDTz8

Again, why does Australia care?

4
8/3/2025 6:20pm
"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.If the numbers...

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.

If the numbers were falsified, and the head was sacked, the markets will lose confidence in the historical numbers, confidence will need to be rebuilt for trust in future numbers.

If the numbers were accurate, and the head was sacked for political reasons, the markets will lose confidence in future numbers.

Either way the markets will not be happy.

"And where is your Epstein lists?"

Good question, has the President issued a Presidential order releasing the files yet, if not, why?

look over there 2.gif?VersionId=0wHPnVFF2edFIR17fHayXMmNH4JDTz8
burn1986 wrote:

Again, why does Australia care?

Popcorn 1
2
2
burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA, USA
8/3/2025 8:19pm Edited Date/Time 8/3/2025 8:20pm
TheGreat wrote:
1754079367582

I can’t stand Collins, but if what I’ve heard is true about how she recruited for Epstein, then I would have to agree with her. 

Collins us at the center of a lying media machine, so it’s tough to get the real story of what happened to Giuffre. 

3
8/3/2025 8:32pm
I'm typing this slow, because I know some of the libby Demorots do not read very fast.I'll try to explain it so even you can understand...

I'm typing this slow, because I know some of the libby Demorots do not read very fast.

I'll try to explain it so even you can understand it.

==============================================

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads. ~ you vitards get into hysterics over anything Trump. (We are in a cult, sure......if that let's you sleep at night.)

And where is your Epstein lists? Trump still on it?

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.If the numbers...

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.

If the numbers were falsified, and the head was sacked, the markets will lose confidence in the historical numbers, confidence will need to be rebuilt for trust in future numbers.

If the numbers were accurate, and the head was sacked for political reasons, the markets will lose confidence in future numbers.

Either way the markets will not be happy.

"And where is your Epstein lists?"

Good question, has the President issued a Presidential order releasing the files yet, if not, why?

look over there 2.gif?VersionId=0wHPnVFF2edFIR17fHayXMmNH4JDTz8

You need a presidential order to post your list?

And I know its hard for your people but try and stay on topic.

Thank you 

Luke

3
8/3/2025 8:46pm
I'm typing this slow, because I know some of the libby Demorots do not read very fast.I'll try to explain it so even you can understand...

I'm typing this slow, because I know some of the libby Demorots do not read very fast.

I'll try to explain it so even you can understand it.

==============================================

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.

Good grief, you guys are just like broads. ~ you vitards get into hysterics over anything Trump. (We are in a cult, sure......if that let's you sleep at night.)

And where is your Epstein lists? Trump still on it?

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.If the numbers...

"Like we even care about the head of labor stats." ~ it does not really matter who the "HEAD" is, it's just the numbers.

If the numbers were falsified, and the head was sacked, the markets will lose confidence in the historical numbers, confidence will need to be rebuilt for trust in future numbers.

If the numbers were accurate, and the head was sacked for political reasons, the markets will lose confidence in future numbers.

Either way the markets will not be happy.

"And where is your Epstein lists?"

Good question, has the President issued a Presidential order releasing the files yet, if not, why?

look over there 2.gif?VersionId=0wHPnVFF2edFIR17fHayXMmNH4JDTz8

You need a presidential order to post your list?

And I know its hard for your people but try and stay on topic.

Thank you 

Luke

Yes, stay on topic, the government has the list, your President can release the list with a Presidential Order...

image 1919
1
2
burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA, USA
8/3/2025 8:57pm
Yes, stay on topic, the government has the list, your President can release the list with a Presidential Order...

Yes, stay on topic, the government has the list, your President can release the list with a Presidential Order...

image 1919

You’ve already said the Pres Order about a hundred times, with a sole focus to indict Trump. Period. 

4
8/3/2025 9:03pm
Yes, stay on topic, the government has the list, your President can release the list with a Presidential Order...

Yes, stay on topic, the government has the list, your President can release the list with a Presidential Order...

image 1919
burn1986 wrote:

You’ve already said the Pres Order about a hundred times, with a sole focus to indict Trump. Period. 

Trump will never be indicted, period.

Trump did promise to release the Epstein files, he has the power, but he hasn't done so, why do you think he hasn't released the files?

3
3
8/3/2025 9:29pm
Yes, stay on topic, the government has the list, your President can release the list with a Presidential Order...

Yes, stay on topic, the government has the list, your President can release the list with a Presidential Order...

image 1919
burn1986 wrote:

You’ve already said the Pres Order about a hundred times, with a sole focus to indict Trump. Period. 

Trump will never be indicted, period.Trump did promise to release the Epstein files, he has the power, but he hasn't done so, why do you think...

Trump will never be indicted, period.

Trump did promise to release the Epstein files, he has the power, but he hasn't done so, why do you think he hasn't released the files?

Do you understand the question?

I'm sure you have a list of people that are on this so-called pedo list? We just need you to enlighten us of WHO YOU thinks is on said list.

Ono hombre and you seem to think you are the two smartest guys on VitalMX correct?

Everyone of you people are dodging the question.......be a man and let us see it! Don't be like the other malcontents.

Thank you 

Luke

5

Post a reply to: Epstein list incoming today

The Latest