The DNC

Titan1 wrote:

The point is that all anyone on the DNC talks about is "trump bad"...that's it!  And that's the problem...if they'd talk more about why their policies...

The point is that all anyone on the DNC talks about is "trump bad"...that's it!  And that's the problem...if they'd talk more about why their policies are so great, and why they are better than Trumps policies...and less about trump being evil...nobody would have to google their policies because that's what I'd see on every video on YouTube (rather than "Trump bad")...the problem is that they aren't running on their policies...and that's why its a perfectly valid question to ask what their policies are...this is the first time in my lifetime when the entire position of one political party isn't policy based, but . 

Kids the original sin?  Tell me you know nothing about Christianity without telling me you know nothing about Christianity...no, kids aren't the original sin. And are you now trying to equate the death penalty (for the absolute worst in our society) with killing innocent babies...good grief...You saying crap like that is why trying to have an adult conversation with you is pointless.  

LoudLove wrote:

The goal of either campaign is victory in November, and the DNC is focusing on their greatest asset:  Trump.  A majority of voters are exhausted by...

The goal of either campaign is victory in November, and the DNC is focusing on their greatest asset:  Trump.  A majority of voters are exhausted by his antics and will surrender a few policy issues to see him gone.  I’m one of those people. 

Inflation has slowed, as have border crossings, and the Fed may soon lower rates.  Our economy grew at record rates under Obama and could do the same under a Harris administration.  While I lean heavily towards republican platforms, I don’t rely on the Executive branch for literally anything, and I’ll accept Harris as president if it finally rids my beloved Republican Party of Trump. 

Zycki11 wrote:

This right here…. I am not pointing this out to single you personally out. However, this thinking is what got us in this position in the...

This right here…. I am not pointing this out to single you personally out. However, this thinking is what got us in this position in the first place. It is short sighted, based off of personal emotions rather than the hard facts. Policy is what matters right now, not feelings, not “hope”. Hard nosed actions. 

The border is a complete disaster that Kamala helped open. The economy is still a disaster, until government stops spending and printing out of their bum this will continue. The fed is in the middle of adding another .25 hike. Crime is a complete joke, transparency is all gone and it is all optics.  Notice she is skipping past the last 4 years? I mean come on my guy. Wake up and smell the bull shit 
 

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

Stage is officially set. Convicted felon and civilly liable rapist vs former prosecutor. Felon vs Prosecutor to be short. I know many of us here value...

Stage is officially set. Convicted felon and civilly liable rapist vs former prosecutor. Felon vs Prosecutor to be short. I know many of us here value law and order and family values, so I know this board will be overwhelmingly voting for Kamala Harris. Not the convicted felon, which goes against a law and order stance, or the civilly liable rapist, which goes against a family values stance.

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

Stage is officially set. Convicted felon and civilly liable rapist vs former prosecutor. Felon vs Prosecutor to be short. I know many of us here value...

Stage is officially set. Convicted felon and civilly liable rapist vs former prosecutor. Felon vs Prosecutor to be short. I know many of us here value law and order and family values, so I know this board will be overwhelmingly voting for Kamala Harris. Not the convicted felon, which goes against a law and order stance, or the civilly liable rapist, which goes against a family values stance.

Gworm wrote:

And you need more proof that the left wants to turn us into a third world country?

 

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

Stage is officially set. Convicted felon and civilly liable rapist vs former prosecutor. Felon vs Prosecutor to be short. I know many of us here value...

Stage is officially set. Convicted felon and civilly liable rapist vs former prosecutor. Felon vs Prosecutor to be short. I know many of us here value law and order and family values, so I know this board will be overwhelmingly voting for Kamala Harris. Not the convicted felon, which goes against a law and order stance, or the civilly liable rapist, which goes against a family values stance.

Gworm wrote:

And you need more proof that the left wants to turn us into a third world country?

 

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

Are you trying to imply that someone committing a crime, then getting charged, having a trial, then getting unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers...

Are you trying to imply that someone committing a crime, then getting charged, having a trial, then getting unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers is turning us into a third world country? 

jchek779 wrote:

It seems you've come here the last few weeks with the same rhetoric - no conviction in your stance and hoping for external validation that what...

It seems you've come here the last few weeks with the same rhetoric - no conviction in your stance and hoping for external validation that what you feel is the right course of action.
 

Boarder crossing have slowed down? Do you not think that the border disaster since 2021 wasn't on purpose, and now that they've been totally exposed is the only reason they've slowed it down? 20+ million illegals. It could have been solved in a day...

View the whole chess board - they did this shit on purpose.  Guys like you are being replaced in America.  You will finally come around and realize what the D party is doing (they are the American arm of the Globalist Cabal) - They're actions are going to hit your bank account, your neighborhood, or a wife/daughter close to you. When you finally come around, it'll be too late. They've already replaced you with illegal immigrant robots addicted to the drip of Democratic promises and programs.

If you don't like Trump due to his character, what do you like about the Harris-Walz campaign aligning themselves with the son of the most evil being we'll see in our lifetime?

ns503 wrote:

Who is that?

SEEMEFIRST wrote:

Alex Soros. Son of big dAddy George.

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

Stage is officially set. Convicted felon and civilly liable rapist vs former prosecutor. Felon vs Prosecutor to be short. I know many of us here value...

Stage is officially set. Convicted felon and civilly liable rapist vs former prosecutor. Felon vs Prosecutor to be short. I know many of us here value law and order and family values, so I know this board will be overwhelmingly voting for Kamala Harris. Not the convicted felon, which goes against a law and order stance, or the civilly liable rapist, which goes against a family values stance.

Gworm wrote:

And you need more proof that the left wants to turn us into a third world country?

 

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

Are you trying to imply that someone committing a crime, then getting charged, having a trial, then getting unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers...

Are you trying to imply that someone committing a crime, then getting charged, having a trial, then getting unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers is turning us into a third world country? 

ns503 wrote:

Who is that?

SEEMEFIRST wrote:

Alex Soros. Son of big dAddy George.

George Costanza wrote:

And do you know who alex soros is engaged to?Huma Mahmood Abedin is an American political staffer who was vice chair of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign...

And do you know who alex soros is engaged to?

Huma Mahmood Abedin is an American political staffer who was vice chair of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign for President of the United States. Before that, Abedin was deputy chief of staff to Clinton when she was U.S. Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013

 

Globalist soros will marry into the DNC!!

ns503 wrote:

Who is that?

SEEMEFIRST wrote:

Alex Soros. Son of big dAddy George.

George Costanza wrote:

And do you know who alex soros is engaged to?Huma Mahmood Abedin is an American political staffer who was vice chair of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign...

And do you know who alex soros is engaged to?

Huma Mahmood Abedin is an American political staffer who was vice chair of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign for President of the United States. Before that, Abedin was deputy chief of staff to Clinton when she was U.S. Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013

 

Globalist soros will marry into the DNC!!

SEEMEFIRST wrote:

Alex Soros. Son of big dAddy George.

George Costanza wrote:

And do you know who alex soros is engaged to?Huma Mahmood Abedin is an American political staffer who was vice chair of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign...

And do you know who alex soros is engaged to?

Huma Mahmood Abedin is an American political staffer who was vice chair of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign for President of the United States. Before that, Abedin was deputy chief of staff to Clinton when she was U.S. Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013

 

Globalist soros will marry into the DNC!!

TeamGreen wrote:

Wasn’t she married to another leftist genius politician…previously? 

Gworm wrote:

And you need more proof that the left wants to turn us into a third world country?

 

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

Are you trying to imply that someone committing a crime, then getting charged, having a trial, then getting unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers...

Are you trying to imply that someone committing a crime, then getting charged, having a trial, then getting unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers is turning us into a third world country? 

Gworm wrote:

It’s sad that you think that is all legit. 

George Costanza wrote:

And do you know who alex soros is engaged to?Huma Mahmood Abedin is an American political staffer who was vice chair of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign...

And do you know who alex soros is engaged to?

Huma Mahmood Abedin is an American political staffer who was vice chair of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign for President of the United States. Before that, Abedin was deputy chief of staff to Clinton when she was U.S. Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013

 

Globalist soros will marry into the DNC!!

TeamGreen wrote:

Wasn’t she married to another leftist genius politician…previously? 

Sandberm656 wrote:

😃I holeshot you Green.Any time i get the chance, I love referencing Carlos Danger!(Anthony Weiner)...it just cracks me up.[img]https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/01/poy_.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=1024[/img] 

😃

I holeshot you Green.

Any time i get the chance, I love referencing Carlos Danger!(Anthony Weiner)...it just cracks me up.

 

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

Are you trying to imply that someone committing a crime, then getting charged, having a trial, then getting unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers...

Are you trying to imply that someone committing a crime, then getting charged, having a trial, then getting unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers is turning us into a third world country? 

Gworm wrote:

It’s sad that you think that is all legit. 

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

I am sad you and millions of others have fallen so far deep into the cult that you deny fact after fact after fact after fact...

I am sad you and millions of others have fallen so far deep into the cult that you deny fact after fact after fact after fact and instead buy into crazy conspiracies such as the election being stolen. We all know you will not accept a loss in November no matter what. Because he won’t no matter what and you’ll follow him blindly like a sheep.

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

Are you trying to imply that someone committing a crime, then getting charged, having a trial, then getting unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers...

Are you trying to imply that someone committing a crime, then getting charged, having a trial, then getting unanimously convicted by a jury of their peers is turning us into a third world country? 

Gworm wrote:

It’s sad that you think that is all legit. 

ThatOneMXGuy wrote:

I am sad you and millions of others have fallen so far deep into the cult that you deny fact after fact after fact after fact...

I am sad you and millions of others have fallen so far deep into the cult that you deny fact after fact after fact after fact and instead buy into crazy conspiracies such as the election being stolen. We all know you will not accept a loss in November no matter what. Because he won’t no matter what and you’ll follow him blindly like a sheep.

Titan1 wrote:

I honestly haven't watched a second of the the DNC thing (I didn't watch a second of the RNC thing either)...I have WAY better things to...

I honestly haven't watched a second of the the DNC thing (I didn't watch a second of the RNC thing either)...I have WAY better things to do than get involved in that staged WWE non-sense...but Akillerwombat...what policies ARE they discussing and talking about at that convention?  I'd honestly like to know what policies Harris is running on...I see so many of her adds on YouTube every day...and EVERY SINGLE ONE has been about Trump...I legit have no clue what her positions are?  (I heard about the price fixing...which is communism 101...I heard about supporting abortion/fixing row v. wade...which is murder...Anything else?)

akillerwombat wrote:

"I haven't watch the DNC and I haven't googled her policies so I have no idea what their policies are." No shit you don't know what...

"I haven't watch the DNC and I haven't googled her policies so I have no idea what their policies are." No shit you don't know what she's running on. Do some research.

RE: Price Fixing, Government does it all the time and no one screams communism.

RE: Abortion being murder, you're a Christian guy, right? And you believe in the death penalty for sinners, yeah? Well, aren't kids the original sin?

Titan1 wrote:

I took your advice and google her...Her website has no mention of her platform...https://kamalaharris.com/  Its just asking for donations. I did find this bbc article from today...https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx924r4d5ynoWhich...

I took your advice and google her...

Her website has no mention of her platform...https://kamalaharris.com/  Its just asking for donations. 

I did find this bbc article from today...https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx924r4d5yno

Which says: "Although she has yet to release a comprehensive platform, her time as a California senator and prosecutor, her 2020 bid for the presidency and subsequent role in the White House give hints as to where Ms Harris stands on a number of policy areas.

Over the years, some of her positions have shifted and even people close to her acknowledge she has sometimes struggled to define herself."

How long has she been the presumptive nominee? And hasn't even bothered to release a platform statement? Leaving everyone to speculate her positions? Which is hard because her positions "have shifted" and she has "struggled to define herself"...we are trying to guess what her positions are, and we have a moving target.  This proves my point...she isn't even running on policies at all...just running against Trump...for all we know she's an avowed communist who is planning to destroy the constitution and start assassinating all dissenters...how anyone can say they'll vote for her at this point...I don't get that? 

On the other hand...you can go to https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform and see exactly what he's running for/on.  And can at least make an educated decision...

Titan1 wrote:

I took your advice and google her...Her website has no mention of her platform...https://kamalaharris.com/  Its just asking for donations. I did find this bbc article from today...https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx924r4d5ynoWhich...

I took your advice and google her...

Her website has no mention of her platform...https://kamalaharris.com/  Its just asking for donations. 

I did find this bbc article from today...https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx924r4d5yno

Which says: "Although she has yet to release a comprehensive platform, her time as a California senator and prosecutor, her 2020 bid for the presidency and subsequent role in the White House give hints as to where Ms Harris stands on a number of policy areas.

Over the years, some of her positions have shifted and even people close to her acknowledge she has sometimes struggled to define herself."

How long has she been the presumptive nominee? And hasn't even bothered to release a platform statement? Leaving everyone to speculate her positions? Which is hard because her positions "have shifted" and she has "struggled to define herself"...we are trying to guess what her positions are, and we have a moving target.  This proves my point...she isn't even running on policies at all...just running against Trump...for all we know she's an avowed communist who is planning to destroy the constitution and start assassinating all dissenters...how anyone can say they'll vote for her at this point...I don't get that? 

On the other hand...you can go to https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform and see exactly what he's running for/on.  And can at least make an educated decision...

akillerwombat wrote:

Did you watch any of the DNC speeches?

Titan1 wrote:

Absolutely not...If I wanted to watch WWE, I'll just watch WWE...I have no patients for political rallies...Do an interview, update your website, have a debate...I'll watch/read/listen...

Absolutely not...If I wanted to watch WWE, I'll just watch WWE...I have no patients for political rallies...Do an interview, update your website, have a debate...I'll watch/read/listen to those.  But I'll never invest even a second of time into a political rally... 

The point is, that she hasn't even released a platform yet...to me that wreaks of weak policies, or that she just doesn't respect he American people enough to even give them the opportunity to learn about her, and she'll just appeal to the lowest common denominator with "Trump bad"...pathetic!

Titan1 wrote:

Absolutely not...If I wanted to watch WWE, I'll just watch WWE...I have no patients for political rallies...Do an interview, update your website, have a debate...I'll watch/read/listen...

Absolutely not...If I wanted to watch WWE, I'll just watch WWE...I have no patients for political rallies...Do an interview, update your website, have a debate...I'll watch/read/listen to those.  But I'll never invest even a second of time into a political rally... 

The point is, that she hasn't even released a platform yet...to me that wreaks of weak policies, or that she just doesn't respect he American people enough to even give them the opportunity to learn about her, and she'll just appeal to the lowest common denominator with "Trump bad"...pathetic!

akillerwombat wrote:

You asked for where you could get the information, I gave you the answer, and you refuse to follow the advice I'm providing that will supply...

You asked for where you could get the information, I gave you the answer, and you refuse to follow the advice I'm providing that will supply you that information.

I suppose it's pointless to chat any further about it if you're not willing to put in the work.

Have a good one!