Forkner - “bad news for them”

GrapeApe wrote:

Focus more on the first sentence of my post

GrapeApe wrote:

Sorry I may not have given you enough credit. Why don't you share with us the salary and bonus structure of their contacts plus the existence...

Sorry I may not have given you enough credit. Why don't you share with us the salary and bonus structure of their contacts plus the existence or non-existence of injury clauses and then we can have an educated discussion about whether those contracts were "earned".

Rosso391 wrote:

No. TO ME they haven't earned their rides because they can't stay healthy and get decent results. Odd crashes or someone crashing into you is one...

No. TO ME they haven't earned their rides because they can't stay healthy and get decent results. Odd crashes or someone crashing into you is one thing. But when you crash by yourself, get injured and can't ride..that's on the rider.

GrapeApe wrote:

How can you say whether they have earned their rides when you have no clue about the terms of their contracts? Both of them brought a...

How can you say whether they have earned their rides when you have no clue about the terms of their contracts? Both of them brought a decent amount of attention and exposure to the team and its sponsors, so they do have value. Whether that value is $5 or $5m is debatable, but without any information at all how can you say who has or hasn't "earned" their ride?

Joey Bridges wrote:

Somebody needs to get a pool going as to how many outdoor rounds before he destroys himself in some spectacular fashion.  (Of his own doing)  ...

Somebody needs to get a pool going as to how many outdoor rounds before he destroys himself in some spectacular fashion. 

(Of his own doing)

 

He seriously needs one of his hangerons to have the stones to tell him not to post shit like that. 

Joey Bridges wrote:

Somebody needs to get a pool going as to how many outdoor rounds before he destroys himself in some spectacular fashion.  (Of his own doing)  ...

Somebody needs to get a pool going as to how many outdoor rounds before he destroys himself in some spectacular fashion. 

(Of his own doing)

 

He seriously needs one of his hangerons to have the stones to tell him not to post shit like that. 

pops wrote:

I did

Joey Bridges wrote:

Somebody needs to get a pool going as to how many outdoor rounds before he destroys himself in some spectacular fashion.  (Of his own doing)  ...

Somebody needs to get a pool going as to how many outdoor rounds before he destroys himself in some spectacular fashion. 

(Of his own doing)

 

He seriously needs one of his hangerons to have the stones to tell him not to post shit like that. 

pops wrote:

I did

DonM wrote:

Man I hope you mean you told him not to post shit like that and not that you started a pool….😂

Rosso391 wrote:

You need to stop BRO. I deleted mine because I didn't need ML to ban me for swearing at a kid on a forum. You've put...

You need to stop BRO. I deleted mine because I didn't need ML to ban me for swearing at a kid on a forum. You've put exactly ZERO people in their place on here.

Magoofan wrote:

Checked our for a few days due to family matters.      So....the "off week" winner of what to argue about was Forkner.   I did not...

Checked our for a few days due to family matters.     

So....the "off week" winner of what to argue about was Forkner.   I did not see that one coming. 

 

Magoofan wrote:

Checked our for a few days due to family matters.      So....the "off week" winner of what to argue about was Forkner.   I did not...

Checked our for a few days due to family matters.     

So....the "off week" winner of what to argue about was Forkner.   I did not see that one coming. 

 

Magoofan wrote:

Checked our for a few days due to family matters.      So....the "off week" winner of what to argue about was Forkner.   I did not...

Checked our for a few days due to family matters.     

So....the "off week" winner of what to argue about was Forkner.   I did not see that one coming. 

 

Chris_Buehler wrote:

Hope everything is ok with the fam

DonM wrote:

And here I thought it was about who deleted the most posts….

DonM wrote:

And here I thought it was about who deleted the most posts….

MxAddic wrote:

They can argue all they want. If doesn’t change the fact it wasn’t me now, before or after, That’s why they are vitards.

DonM wrote:

Even more irony for those that pay attention.....

DonM wrote:

Even more irony for those that pay attention.....

MxAddic wrote:

I often think about the mods setting back and laughing at all the false accusations.

DonM wrote:

So you're saying you never deleted any posts or threads you started? Do you ever just let something go and just not respond?.....ever?

DonM wrote:

So you're saying you never deleted any posts or threads you started? Do you ever just let something go and just not respond?.....ever?

MxAddic wrote:

I never said that. I was speaking to the stuff folks constantly say I deleted that I didn’t. Just another feeble attempt at a cheap shot...

I never said that. I was speaking to the stuff folks constantly say I deleted that I didn’t. Just another feeble attempt at a cheap shot by you. I let a bunch of stuff go. You just have no way of knowing.

There is a little thing called context that the vitards live to distort.

fourfourone wrote:

You edit and delete constantly....

DeleteAddic

fourfourone wrote:

You edit and delete constantly....

DeleteAddic

MxAddic wrote:

And you Dingle my balls constantly. Which one is better?

And you Dingle my balls constantly. Which one is better?

DonM wrote:

So you're saying you never deleted any posts or threads you started? Do you ever just let something go and just not respond?.....ever?

MxAddic wrote:

I never said that. I was speaking to the stuff folks constantly say I deleted that I didn’t. Just another feeble attempt at a cheap shot...

I never said that. I was speaking to the stuff folks constantly say I deleted that I didn’t. Just another feeble attempt at a cheap shot by you. I let a bunch of stuff go. You just have no way of knowing.

There is a little thing called context that the vitards live to distort.

DonM wrote:

So now asking you a direct question is a feeble attempt at a cheap shot...ok...fact is you have deleted posts and threads you have started but...

So now asking you a direct question is a feeble attempt at a cheap shot...ok...fact is you have deleted posts and threads you have started but you then call out and blame others for doing the same thing..... the ironic part is you calling them vitards....if Vitard was in the dictionary your picture would be in the description....

Magoofan wrote:

Checked our for a few days due to family matters.      So....the "off week" winner of what to argue about was Forkner.   I did not...

Checked our for a few days due to family matters.     

So....the "off week" winner of what to argue about was Forkner.   I did not see that one coming. 

 

Chris_Buehler wrote:

Hope everything is ok with the fam

Magoofan wrote:

Thanks.  I appreciate the kind words.   My mom is close to passing.   She was near death and surprised everyone with pulling through, it's not the first...

Thanks.  I appreciate the kind words.   My mom is close to passing.   She was near death and surprised everyone with pulling through, it's not the first time either.   ...but it is just a matter of time now.   She's a fighter and apparently not yet ready to meet her maker.