New 2023 YZ450F

swaldrop
Posts
121
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tampa, FL US
7/25/2023 6:24pm
Rider 5280 wrote:
You missed my point. This is not a "we vs. them" argument. I was kindly trying to say: be respectful, listen, and you might improve your...

You missed my point.

This is not a "we vs. them" argument.

I was kindly trying to say: be respectful, listen, and you might improve your craft - because around most corners are surprises. Teamwork makes the dream work - embrace the feedback of others you don't necessarily agree with and use it as a calibration. There's value there, really!

To be honest, I was rying to throw you a bone. An opportunity to take the high road and not turn me and others off of your company because I think your products are innovative and the industry can always use this.

But instead you went down this "burden of proof" hole and opened things up further. You use words like "stupid" and "absurd," etc. Strong company leaders don't do that. So don't. Help us help you grow - and up the professionalism.

Stop digging and continue some kicka$$ engineering.

The only reason I even waste my time with a response like this is that I often mentor engineers and engineering management. It's a serious disservice to them to perpetuate this "us vs. them" mentality - especially given many in this forum are going to school now to be MEs, EEs, etc. Everyone on the development team has value and biases, embrace them and make them superpowers. You can - it works - and it works amazingly! This is the last I will say on this, but I lost a lot of respect when you started slinging mud. Not cool - regardless of your opinion. Instead use your intelligence to offer another point of view and promote collaboration, not division. If you grow your company much, your demeanor and treatment of dissention will be CRITICAL to your success. Trust me.

DM me if you want to discuss this further.

 

Word. The moment you think you have it all figured and prove unwilling to accept another point of view is about where I lose interest in anything you’re trying to convince me of. Not interested in your products or services at that point, let alone the accolades you’re hanging your opinions on. 
 

My ‘23 YZ450F has finally settled in though 👍 I got the chassis to quit kicking my butt after ~20 hours of riding and dicking with clickers or sag. I ended up back at a relatively base setting and it’s been dialed since. Clutch is still a little soft and the rebound may be a bit too quick still in the rear, but I’m all in on this new gen bike. 

1
1
Luxon MX
Posts
1374
Joined
11/6/2017
Location
San Diego, CA US
Fantasy
7/25/2023 7:16pm
Rider 5280 wrote:
You missed my point. This is not a "we vs. them" argument. I was kindly trying to say: be respectful, listen, and you might improve your...

You missed my point.

This is not a "we vs. them" argument.

I was kindly trying to say: be respectful, listen, and you might improve your craft - because around most corners are surprises. Teamwork makes the dream work - embrace the feedback of others you don't necessarily agree with and use it as a calibration. There's value there, really!

To be honest, I was rying to throw you a bone. An opportunity to take the high road and not turn me and others off of your company because I think your products are innovative and the industry can always use this.

But instead you went down this "burden of proof" hole and opened things up further. You use words like "stupid" and "absurd," etc. Strong company leaders don't do that. So don't. Help us help you grow - and up the professionalism.

Stop digging and continue some kicka$$ engineering.

The only reason I even waste my time with a response like this is that I often mentor engineers and engineering management. It's a serious disservice to them to perpetuate this "us vs. them" mentality - especially given many in this forum are going to school now to be MEs, EEs, etc. Everyone on the development team has value and biases, embrace them and make them superpowers. You can - it works - and it works amazingly! This is the last I will say on this, but I lost a lot of respect when you started slinging mud. Not cool - regardless of your opinion. Instead use your intelligence to offer another point of view and promote collaboration, not division. If you grow your company much, your demeanor and treatment of dissention will be CRITICAL to your success. Trust me.

DM me if you want to discuss this further.

 

I have never made it an "we vs. them" situation, but it seems you have for some reason? In fact I've stated many times over that we need both engineers and test riders, in this thread and in others. You're making the argument that perhaps I'm wrong (the engineer), yet at the same time you seem to be making the argument that Keefer (the test rider) can't be wrong. Why is that? Why is there no burden of proof on his end? 

We've tested with A LOT of riders, from weekend warriors to top professionals who are much faster than Keefer. I understand the limitations of testing quite well, and there are a lot of them! Just as there are in engineering.

Last year we had a top professional rider (one everyone here has heard of) give very different feedback for two identical sets of triple clamps. And by identical, I mean they were as identical as they possibly could be! They were made in the same manufacturing run one right after the other, from the same bar of material, anodized in the same lot, assembled by the same mechanic to the same specifications, tested on the same track back to back, etc. I could not make them any more identical if I tried. Yet the rider felt a (rather significant) difference between the two. Would you argue that I should listen to his feedback when I know he tested two identical parts and got different results? What happened there is he went into the test expecting them to be different, so he came back with different results.

Track testing can be quite valuable, but there can be some significant limitations to it too. Knowing and understanding these is critical. Keefer is a good rider and a good test rider. But he's simply off his rocker with this one. Go ahead and ask some other engineers their opinion and see what they say about it. Just because I told it like it really is doesn't make me hard to work with. I've found quite the opposite, really, and the good engineering managers appreciate it if I can back it up. If Illumina decides not to work with us because they read a post on Vital, well, that's fine with me. But that would be strange as they're already a client of ours...

4
2
scott15
Posts
8
Joined
12/5/2022
Location
Port Angeles, WA US
7/25/2023 7:22pm Edited Date/Time 7/25/2023 7:23pm
TomC31 wrote:
Hi Everyone, a further update on my problem I encountered, the bike is now stuck with the launch control on and does not come off, whether...

Hi Everyone, a further update on my problem I encountered, the bike is now stuck with the launch control on and does not come off, whether you change gears to 3rd, 4th it doesn't come off.

Also the orange light flashing indicating launch control is on stays on even when the bike is turned off. The only way to stop it is to disconnect the battery. 
 

On the power tuner app it comes up with Diagnostic Code 13.

Has anyone encountered this or know any solution?

I disconnected the kill/map switch completely and rode the bike and the launch control is still stuck on. 
 

 

I don’t know if it’s a possibility of this being the fix in your situation, but since that code pertains to the intake pressure sensor, it may be worth rerouting the CCV that goes into the airbox on the 23’s. Being the description is a circuit code and not the air temp port clogged code, it’s not likely the fix but worth a try to eliminate future issues after you inspect. On my 23 I have a 22 model CCV hose ran to the atmosphere and then capped the nipple on the airbox to prevent pressure sensor issues with the oil getting caked in there. 

Boggins
Posts
409
Joined
7/30/2019
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA US
7/25/2023 7:26pm

Yes '22 FMF muffler will fit '23 bike

The Shop

scott15
Posts
8
Joined
12/5/2022
Location
Port Angeles, WA US
7/25/2023 7:28pm Edited Date/Time 7/25/2023 7:28pm

Anyone know if the fmf 4.1 silencer for the 2022 fits the 2023

It does, I had one on my 23 for a bit. I just took it off for a full Akrapovic. 

tek14
Posts
4906
Joined
1/26/2014
Location
Vantaa FI
7/25/2023 11:44pm

After Keefer.. yes Keefer said FCP mounts were great I wanted to test what difference different engine mounts will do. Made cut out ones to test softer upper mounts still running stock at front. Coming down hill with braking bumps bike was moving side to side more with softer mounts as stock mounts bike stayed straight and felt like suspension was working better same time. Dont know how soft FCP mounts are but after this test I would save my money and run stock mounts. Will do more testing but that was feeling first week just testing mounts keeping everything else same. 

Anyone found stiffer clutch spring yet? I just cant deal soft spring and short time with plates in soft sand. Yes in hardpack soft feeling is great and plates will go longer but in deep sand they wont last. 

DB97
Posts
1179
Joined
7/28/2016
Location
Orlando, FL US
7/26/2023 1:18am
tek14 wrote:
After Keefer.. yes Keefer said FCP mounts were great I wanted to test what difference different engine mounts will do. Made cut out ones to test...

After Keefer.. yes Keefer said FCP mounts were great I wanted to test what difference different engine mounts will do. Made cut out ones to test softer upper mounts still running stock at front. Coming down hill with braking bumps bike was moving side to side more with softer mounts as stock mounts bike stayed straight and felt like suspension was working better same time. Dont know how soft FCP mounts are but after this test I would save my money and run stock mounts. Will do more testing but that was feeling first week just testing mounts keeping everything else same. 

Anyone found stiffer clutch spring yet? I just cant deal soft spring and short time with plates in soft sand. Yes in hardpack soft feeling is great and plates will go longer but in deep sand they wont last. 

I got the rekluse torq drive pack working well. The adjustment ring does change how much bite it has. The 3 it called for was way too soft down low but with setting 2 it pulls perfectly down low. I was able to lug 3rd easily on setting 2 which is what I wanted. Setting 1 was un rideable with the plate thickness I have. 

VPG43
Posts
59
Joined
10/16/2020
Location
NL
7/26/2023 1:22am
tek14 wrote:
After Keefer.. yes Keefer said FCP mounts were great I wanted to test what difference different engine mounts will do. Made cut out ones to test...

After Keefer.. yes Keefer said FCP mounts were great I wanted to test what difference different engine mounts will do. Made cut out ones to test softer upper mounts still running stock at front. Coming down hill with braking bumps bike was moving side to side more with softer mounts as stock mounts bike stayed straight and felt like suspension was working better same time. Dont know how soft FCP mounts are but after this test I would save my money and run stock mounts. Will do more testing but that was feeling first week just testing mounts keeping everything else same. 

Anyone found stiffer clutch spring yet? I just cant deal soft spring and short time with plates in soft sand. Yes in hardpack soft feeling is great and plates will go longer but in deep sand they wont last. 

I had contact with Hinson but it will be a couple of months before one will be introduced.

TomC31
Posts
216
Joined
3/15/2017
Location
Temecula, CA US
7/26/2023 4:41am
scott15 wrote:
I don’t know if it’s a possibility of this being the fix in your situation, but since that code pertains to the intake pressure sensor, it...

I don’t know if it’s a possibility of this being the fix in your situation, but since that code pertains to the intake pressure sensor, it may be worth rerouting the CCV that goes into the airbox on the 23’s. Being the description is a circuit code and not the air temp port clogged code, it’s not likely the fix but worth a try to eliminate future issues after you inspect. On my 23 I have a 22 model CCV hose ran to the atmosphere and then capped the nipple on the airbox to prevent pressure sensor issues with the oil getting caked in there. 

Hi Scott,

Thankyou for your reply.

So after a bit of work and some help from a team here in Australia. I unplugged my ECU and found some water and grit in there. I cleaned it all out, dried it, plugged it back in and now it's all good!

I will be doing this every few rides now to make sure that it is dry and not happen again.

The bike now runs fine and fault code is gone.

HerlingsFTW
Posts
66
Joined
4/29/2020
Location
Jacksonville, FL US
7/26/2023 8:32am Edited Date/Time 7/26/2023 8:32am

does someone know when they usually introduce the next years bike?

Im not sure if I should buy a 23 now or wait for the 24..

VPG43
Posts
59
Joined
10/16/2020
Location
NL
7/26/2023 8:39am
scott15 wrote:
I don’t know if it’s a possibility of this being the fix in your situation, but since that code pertains to the intake pressure sensor, it...

I don’t know if it’s a possibility of this being the fix in your situation, but since that code pertains to the intake pressure sensor, it may be worth rerouting the CCV that goes into the airbox on the 23’s. Being the description is a circuit code and not the air temp port clogged code, it’s not likely the fix but worth a try to eliminate future issues after you inspect. On my 23 I have a 22 model CCV hose ran to the atmosphere and then capped the nipple on the airbox to prevent pressure sensor issues with the oil getting caked in there. 

TomC31 wrote:
Hi Scott, Thankyou for your reply. So after a bit of work and some help from a team here in Australia. I unplugged my ECU and...

Hi Scott,

Thankyou for your reply.

So after a bit of work and some help from a team here in Australia. I unplugged my ECU and found some water and grit in there. I cleaned it all out, dried it, plugged it back in and now it's all good!

I will be doing this every few rides now to make sure that it is dry and not happen again.

The bike now runs fine and fault code is gone.

Tape the rubber boot around the plug. 

VPG43
Posts
59
Joined
10/16/2020
Location
NL
7/26/2023 8:39am

does someone know when they usually introduce the next years bike?

Im not sure if I should buy a 23 now or wait for the 24..

Someone said today….

DB97
Posts
1179
Joined
7/28/2016
Location
Orlando, FL US
7/26/2023 8:58am
scott15 wrote:
I don’t know if it’s a possibility of this being the fix in your situation, but since that code pertains to the intake pressure sensor, it...

I don’t know if it’s a possibility of this being the fix in your situation, but since that code pertains to the intake pressure sensor, it may be worth rerouting the CCV that goes into the airbox on the 23’s. Being the description is a circuit code and not the air temp port clogged code, it’s not likely the fix but worth a try to eliminate future issues after you inspect. On my 23 I have a 22 model CCV hose ran to the atmosphere and then capped the nipple on the airbox to prevent pressure sensor issues with the oil getting caked in there. 

TomC31 wrote:
Hi Scott, Thankyou for your reply. So after a bit of work and some help from a team here in Australia. I unplugged my ECU and...

Hi Scott,

Thankyou for your reply.

So after a bit of work and some help from a team here in Australia. I unplugged my ECU and found some water and grit in there. I cleaned it all out, dried it, plugged it back in and now it's all good!

I will be doing this every few rides now to make sure that it is dry and not happen again.

The bike now runs fine and fault code is gone.

That’s exactly what I found too. 

Rider 5280
Posts
2389
Joined
11/9/2011
Location
Denver Metro, CO US
7/26/2023 9:04am Edited Date/Time 7/26/2023 9:23am

does someone know when they usually introduce the next years bike?

Im not sure if I should buy a 23 now or wait for the 24..

VPG43 wrote:

Someone said today….

VPG43
Posts
59
Joined
10/16/2020
Location
NL
7/26/2023 9:22am

does someone know when they usually introduce the next years bike?

Im not sure if I should buy a 23 now or wait for the 24..

VPG43 wrote:

Someone said today….

Rider 5280 wrote:

Seems to be no changes on the 450..

Motofinne
Posts
11408
Joined
1/4/2014
Location
FI
7/26/2023 9:22am Edited Date/Time 7/26/2023 9:25am

does someone know when they usually introduce the next years bike?

Im not sure if I should buy a 23 now or wait for the 24..

VPG43 wrote:

Someone said today….

Rider 5280 wrote:

Man why did they go with black rims on the 50th Anniversary Edition? Should've been silver.

1
1
swaldrop
Posts
121
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tampa, FL US
7/26/2023 9:27am
VPG43 wrote:

Seems to be no changes on the 450..

Either no changes were made or they fixed some of the issues without shining a light on them. Curious to see more details from the mags about changes 

tek14
Posts
4906
Joined
1/26/2014
Location
Vantaa FI
7/26/2023 11:22am
VPG43 wrote:

Seems to be no changes on the 450..

swaldrop wrote:
Either no changes were made or they fixed some of the issues without shining a light on them. Curious to see more details from the mags...

Either no changes were made or they fixed some of the issues without shining a light on them. Curious to see more details from the mags about changes 

Usually updated parts numbers for update parts. Maybe they are happy with engine/clutch if no updated parts. 

HerlingsFTW
Posts
66
Joined
4/29/2020
Location
Jacksonville, FL US
7/26/2023 11:23am

image-20230726202200-1

 

image-20230726202342-2

 

fantic or yamaha?

2
TomC31
Posts
216
Joined
3/15/2017
Location
Temecula, CA US
7/26/2023 4:15pm
VPG43 wrote:

Tape the rubber boot around the plug. 

I will look into that !

1
TomC31
Posts
216
Joined
3/15/2017
Location
Temecula, CA US
7/26/2023 4:16pm
DB97 wrote:

That’s exactly what I found too. 

Hopefully this information on here can help some others!

7/26/2023 6:46pm
tek14 wrote:
After Keefer.. yes Keefer said FCP mounts were great I wanted to test what difference different engine mounts will do. Made cut out ones to test...

After Keefer.. yes Keefer said FCP mounts were great I wanted to test what difference different engine mounts will do. Made cut out ones to test softer upper mounts still running stock at front. Coming down hill with braking bumps bike was moving side to side more with softer mounts as stock mounts bike stayed straight and felt like suspension was working better same time. Dont know how soft FCP mounts are but after this test I would save my money and run stock mounts. Will do more testing but that was feeling first week just testing mounts keeping everything else same. 

Anyone found stiffer clutch spring yet? I just cant deal soft spring and short time with plates in soft sand. Yes in hardpack soft feeling is great and plates will go longer but in deep sand they wont last. 

DB97 wrote:
I got the rekluse torq drive pack working well. The adjustment ring does change how much bite it has. The 3 it called for was way...

I got the rekluse torq drive pack working well. The adjustment ring does change how much bite it has. The 3 it called for was way too soft down low but with setting 2 it pulls perfectly down low. I was able to lug 3rd easily on setting 2 which is what I wanted. Setting 1 was un rideable with the plate thickness I have. 

DB97 

Got any sand set up tips you've found with set up ? 

DB97
Posts
1179
Joined
7/28/2016
Location
Orlando, FL US
7/27/2023 3:08am

DB97 

Got any sand set up tips you've found with set up ? 

Right now I’m running 4mm fork height with 104 sag. I’ve tried 2mm up and flush with the forks but didn’t like the way it felt. I’m still chasing a setting where I don’t feel everything in my hands. I’m using all of the suspension and it’s not that it feels bad, just too much feedback for my liking. I have FCP mounts coming and also have a 17 swingarm to try still. 

2
7/27/2023 4:39am

DB97 

Got any sand set up tips you've found with set up ? 

DB97 wrote:
Right now I’m running 4mm fork height with 104 sag. I’ve tried 2mm up and flush with the forks but didn’t like the way it felt...

Right now I’m running 4mm fork height with 104 sag. I’ve tried 2mm up and flush with the forks but didn’t like the way it felt. I’m still chasing a setting where I don’t feel everything in my hands. I’m using all of the suspension and it’s not that it feels bad, just too much feedback for my liking. I have FCP mounts coming and also have a 17 swingarm to try still. 

How much longer is the 17 swingarm? 😀

DB97
Posts
1179
Joined
7/28/2016
Location
Orlando, FL US
7/27/2023 5:18am
MadsDausel wrote:

How much longer is the 17 swingarm? 😀

13mm or so. But as you know on the 23 you can’t have the wheel all the way back with the current 13-50 ratio. So when I get it on I’ll measure the swingarm pivot to axle length on both and see where it ends up. I’m assuming I’ll have an extra link or two on the chain.

2
GPrider
Posts
750
Joined
4/10/2014
Location
La Mesa, CA US
7/27/2023 7:53am
MadsDausel wrote:

How much longer is the 17 swingarm? 😀

DB97 wrote:
13mm or so. But as you know on the 23 you can’t have the wheel all the way back with the current 13-50 ratio. So when...

13mm or so. But as you know on the 23 you can’t have the wheel all the way back with the current 13-50 ratio. So when I get it on I’ll measure the swingarm pivot to axle length on both and see where it ends up. I’m assuming I’ll have an extra link or two on the chain.

I have a 14/51 setup and its pretty much all the way back. 14 tooth also calms the rear too, its a win win

GPrider
Posts
750
Joined
4/10/2014
Location
La Mesa, CA US
7/27/2023 8:00am

also, I found the stock engine hangers modified did help no doubt on the hands, no question about it. I machined out my stock ones, not the FCP. Although I plan on buying the FCP as it also comes with the front mounts too. I honestly believe in works. I tested back to back on my modified stock ones and it was quite a difference. The comfort was noticeable, took away the jarring feel in rough stuff. 

tek14
Posts
4906
Joined
1/26/2014
Location
Vantaa FI
7/27/2023 9:51am
GPrider wrote:
also, I found the stock engine hangers modified did help no doubt on the hands, no question about it. I machined out my stock ones, not...

also, I found the stock engine hangers modified did help no doubt on the hands, no question about it. I machined out my stock ones, not the FCP. Although I plan on buying the FCP as it also comes with the front mounts too. I honestly believe in works. I tested back to back on my modified stock ones and it was quite a difference. The comfort was noticeable, took away the jarring feel in rough stuff. 

How much you did cut them and what kind of track you riding? Just upper mounts or front also? 

GPrider
Posts
750
Joined
4/10/2014
Location
La Mesa, CA US
7/27/2023 11:32am
GPrider wrote:
also, I found the stock engine hangers modified did help no doubt on the hands, no question about it. I machined out my stock ones, not...

also, I found the stock engine hangers modified did help no doubt on the hands, no question about it. I machined out my stock ones, not the FCP. Although I plan on buying the FCP as it also comes with the front mounts too. I honestly believe in works. I tested back to back on my modified stock ones and it was quite a difference. The comfort was noticeable, took away the jarring feel in rough stuff. 

tek14 wrote:

How much you did cut them and what kind of track you riding? Just upper mounts or front also? 

I machined basically the same shape as the FCP, just a little smaller as I didn't want to start too big and junk the mount. Yes, just the upper mounts. But it was noticeable right away with the chassis just not being so stiff and deflective feeling in the forks mainly. I ride off road only, so cal desert chop and square edge whoops kind of stuff. It would really be noticeable I believe at places like Glen Helen where it gets all shitty later in the day. Just haven't made it there yet. I'm so convinced I'm going to just buy the FCP because I also want to front one peace ti mounts too. 

scott15
Posts
8
Joined
12/5/2022
Location
Port Angeles, WA US
7/27/2023 6:06pm Edited Date/Time 7/27/2023 10:19pm
MadsDausel wrote:

How much longer is the 17 swingarm? 😀

DB97 wrote:
13mm or so. But as you know on the 23 you can’t have the wheel all the way back with the current 13-50 ratio. So when...

13mm or so. But as you know on the 23 you can’t have the wheel all the way back with the current 13-50 ratio. So when I get it on I’ll measure the swingarm pivot to axle length on both and see where it ends up. I’m assuming I’ll have an extra link or two on the chain.

GPrider wrote:

I have a 14/51 setup and its pretty much all the way back. 14 tooth also calms the rear too, its a win win

Mine is between 12-14mm further back with 13/50 and 17 swing arm. Noticeably more balanced and stable in the chop, less pitching from what I can tell and still turns great.

4

Post a reply to: New 2023 YZ450F

The Latest