Video re-run: MXDN 2006 “Everts Last Stand”

9/30/2009 3:50pm
Pondo1664 wrote:
Pondo1664 wrote: Just run their moto finishes past me one more time? yamaharider4life01 wrote: It is a TEAM event...individual moto finishes aren't important...and as a result...
Pondo1664 wrote: Just run their moto finishes past me one more time?


yamaharider4life01 wrote: It is a TEAM event...individual moto finishes aren't important...and as a result the riders don't have the I HAVE TO WIN THE RACE mentality (rather a WE have to win the event mentality) and the riders approach the event different, and may not ride to win a moto so as to gaurantee they'll win the event.

Get it?

TEAM EVENT...Say it one more time....TEAM EVENT....okay one more (I know some of you guys are really slow)...TEAM EVENT!!!

Got it? James wasnt' racing for an individual victory...he was racing for the TEAM! (which he won).

The chamberlain trophy goes to the top TEAM...individual results DO NOT MATTER!

James TEAM won...Everts TEAM lost. End of story.
=============================================================
Oh, I'm sorry - have we changed the topic of conversation in here? I thought we were talking about whether James beat Stefan or Stefan beat James? You can spout that crap all day long - in fact, you can spout it all day and all night and all next day, too, and I won't lose a whisker of sleep - but what you're REALLY doing is trying to move the argument onto different and irrelevant ground .

If you don't think James was trying that day, then I've got to question the relevance of your posts to this argument. No-one's trying to suggest that USA didn't win, or Belgium should have won, or Stefan's better than James who's better than Ricky who's better than whoever. All that's going on here is this - Stefan was the better rider on the day, and James couldn't beat him. As to whether or not that matters, or is a relevant point, or makes a difference to the world at large, I have to refer you to Zolder 2003.

By the by, if I ever learn how to quote without having to fuck about copy and pasting to avoid those adverts at the bottom, I'll be a happy man... Smile
Anyway, you mention "irrelevant ground" at the end of your first paragraph...let me tell you what is truly "irrelevant ground" when talking about the MXdN...what's irrelevant...
Anyway, you mention "irrelevant ground" at the end of your first paragraph...let me tell you what is truly "irrelevant ground" when talking about the MXdN...what's irrelevant is INDIVIDUAL RESULTS AT A TEAM EVENT.

You are the one talking about individual results at a team event and therefore you are the one talking all irrelevant n shit.

If it was an individual event James would have laid the hammer down and left Everts in the dust. You can bet your ass on that. Anyone that will deny that doesn't know a damn thing about moto.

(oh, and about quoting and the adds at the bottom..try F11...it'll move 'em right out the way.)
cillitbang wrote:
Put the hammer down? feck me if he did it anymore at Matterly he wouldn't have finished the race dude, he would have been packed up...
Put the hammer down? feck me if he did it anymore at Matterly he wouldn't have finished the race dude, he would have been packed up into an ambulance and on route to a + e!!! He was on the edge up until the final 5 mins of the second moto!!! Don't you understand? He had nothing there to challenge Stefan that day! Anyone that was there and watched it will tell you the same... now wake up and smell the coffee, because you wasn't there and obviously don't have a clue... you probably couldn't bear watching the end of the video the guy posted... swallow some pride and admit that the bettter guy one that day?
You're speculation is absolutely funny...

James had way more in the tank that he showed at Matterly...WAY more. I've watched him ride many many many times.

Really? I wasn't there? How do you know that?

And even so...I"ve seen video of the race...which is just as good as being there...


And the better guy DID WIN THAT DAY....James and Team USA took home the trophy.

Why can't you see this?
Pondo1664
Posts
30
Joined
9/6/2008
Location
Birmingham GB
9/30/2009 3:52pm
Because he didn't win - he went 2-2. Trophy schmophy, that's not what we're talking about...
9/30/2009 3:53pm
Anyway, you mention "irrelevant ground" at the end of your first paragraph...let me tell you what is truly "irrelevant ground" when talking about the MXdN...what's irrelevant...
Anyway, you mention "irrelevant ground" at the end of your first paragraph...let me tell you what is truly "irrelevant ground" when talking about the MXdN...what's irrelevant is INDIVIDUAL RESULTS AT A TEAM EVENT.

You are the one talking about individual results at a team event and therefore you are the one talking all irrelevant n shit.

If it was an individual event James would have laid the hammer down and left Everts in the dust. You can bet your ass on that. Anyone that will deny that doesn't know a damn thing about moto.

(oh, and about quoting and the adds at the bottom..try F11...it'll move 'em right out the way.)
Pondo1664 wrote:
No, it's not irrelevant at all - the whole point of this post is to show how Stefan beat Stewart at the '06 des Nations. It's...
No, it's not irrelevant at all - the whole point of this post is to show how Stefan beat Stewart at the '06 des Nations. It's is absolutely and utterly as relevant as Ricky beating Everts at the des Nats in '03 - you can't have one without the other.

Let's have a look at race times - race one ran for 16 laps, that's 34 minutes and 51 seconds, Everts beating Stewart by 11 seconds. Race three also ran for 16 laps, but the winner crossed the line at 34 minutes and 27 seconds, Everts beating Stewart by less than five seconds. Both of them set their fastest lap on lap 14, some way faster than their fastet laps in the first moto.

Are you seriously telling me they weren't going for it? If so, that's an insult to James, 'cause I was there and that cat was not messing around.

Cheers for the shout on F11 BTW, that's made life a whole load easier! Smile
Ricky beating Everts in 03 is irrelevant...the MXdN is a TEAM event...individual results are meaningless.

Stewart was not going for it...Everts was, I have no doubt about that...But stewart had way more in the tank. I've watched him ride many many times, and he's way faster than he showed at Matterly.

He wanted the team win...he got it...mission accomplished.
9/30/2009 3:54pm
Pondo1664 wrote:
Because he didn't win - he went 2-2. Trophy schmophy, that's not what we're talking about...
Is the MXdN a team event???? YES

Is the Chamberlain Trophy the prize the TEAMS go there to win???? YES

Does the Chamberlain Trophy go to the winner??? YES

Did James Stewart and TEAM USA take home the trophy??? YES

How can you say "he didn't win"??? He got the trophy...he won....don't be stupid.

The Shop

9/30/2009 3:56pm Edited Date/Time 9/30/2009 3:57pm
Your specualtion is far more hilarious... How do you know how hard Everts was going for it?!!! Everts looked alot more confortable than Stewart... oh and if memory serves me right... he didnt take a soil sample either?!!! Jeeze u have been owned on this subject, go hide under a rock!!!
9/30/2009 3:56pm
robkinuk wrote:
[i]If it was an individual event James would have laid the hammer down and left Everts in the dust. You can bet your ass on that...
If it was an individual event James would have laid the hammer down and left Everts in the dust. You can bet your ass on that. Anyone that will deny that doesn't know a damn thing about moto.
LOL

Were you there that day?, thought not or you wouldn't embarass yourself making such dumb comments.

Go suck on JS sack some more!
He HE HE HE!

Keep jumping to conclusions....

You don't have to be there to have seen the race...all you Euro's love to attempt to give credibility to your half assed posts by saying "i was there"...big fuckin' deal...

When you are at a motocross race, you SEE far LESS than the people that watch it on TV. FAR LESS.

So take that and smoke it...
9/30/2009 4:00pm
cillitbang wrote:
Your specualtion is far more hilarious... How do you know how hard Everts was going for it?!!! Everts looked alot more confortable than Stewart... oh and...
Your specualtion is far more hilarious... How do you know how hard Everts was going for it?!!! Everts looked alot more confortable than Stewart... oh and if memory serves me right... he didnt take a soil sample either?!!! Jeeze u have been owned on this subject, go hide under a rock!!!
Whatever...that's how James rides, brah....he's not a smooth, precise rider like Everts and Windham and C. Pourcel (for example)...he's got an all over the place, feet off the pegs style-especially in 2006 (not as much as Hannah or RC, though).

If you go by who looks the most comfortable on the track equals the fastest rider then you must think RC is slow????

Come on...let's just be realistic...

James won. His Team took home the trophy everyone showed up to win. End of story. Saying he lost some stupid ass "individual" win at a TEAM event is stupid.

Owned...please...you guys haven't even seen my A game yet...I'm still getting warmed up.
Pondo1664
Posts
30
Joined
9/6/2008
Location
Birmingham GB
9/30/2009 4:01pm
Pondo1664 wrote:
Because he didn't win - he went 2-2. Trophy schmophy, that's not what we're talking about...
Is the MXdN a team event???? YES Is the Chamberlain Trophy the prize the TEAMS go there to win???? YES Does the Chamberlain Trophy go to...
Is the MXdN a team event???? YES

Is the Chamberlain Trophy the prize the TEAMS go there to win???? YES

Does the Chamberlain Trophy go to the winner??? YES

Did James Stewart and TEAM USA take home the trophy??? YES

How can you say "he didn't win"??? He got the trophy...he won....don't be stupid.
MX1 class

Everts went 1-1
Stewart went 2-2

That's how I say he didn't win. Because, err... He didn't. His TEAM did, but he didn't. Some bloke called Everts beat him. You can look the results up and everything.

Good night, by the way - it's late here, more tomorrw. Smile
G-man
Posts
8920
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ US
9/30/2009 4:03pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 2:26am
cillitbang wrote:
Your specualtion is far more hilarious... How do you know how hard Everts was going for it?!!! Everts looked alot more confortable than Stewart... oh and...
Your specualtion is far more hilarious... How do you know how hard Everts was going for it?!!! Everts looked alot more confortable than Stewart... oh and if memory serves me right... he didnt take a soil sample either?!!! Jeeze u have been owned on this subject, go hide under a rock!!!
hehehehe all this banter is great stuff & part of what I luv about this race.

But according to Trip "Only me and a few others care" so in reality I only expect a few dozen people sitting on their hands bored to death to actually attend. lol

Can't wait till next yr i already have my tickets--oh wait I don't know who the promotor is and there is no PR so it can't be that big a deal anyway.....

Carry on
9/30/2009 4:13pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 2:26am
cillitbang wrote:
Your specualtion is far more hilarious... How do you know how hard Everts was going for it?!!! Everts looked alot more confortable than Stewart... oh and...
Your specualtion is far more hilarious... How do you know how hard Everts was going for it?!!! Everts looked alot more confortable than Stewart... oh and if memory serves me right... he didnt take a soil sample either?!!! Jeeze u have been owned on this subject, go hide under a rock!!!
Whatever...that's how James rides, brah....he's not a smooth, precise rider like Everts and Windham and C. Pourcel (for example)...he's got an all over the place, feet...
Whatever...that's how James rides, brah....he's not a smooth, precise rider like Everts and Windham and C. Pourcel (for example)...he's got an all over the place, feet off the pegs style-especially in 2006 (not as much as Hannah or RC, though).

If you go by who looks the most comfortable on the track equals the fastest rider then you must think RC is slow????

Come on...let's just be realistic...

James won. His Team took home the trophy everyone showed up to win. End of story. Saying he lost some stupid ass "individual" win at a TEAM event is stupid.

Owned...please...you guys haven't even seen my A game yet...I'm still getting warmed up.
Again your jumping to conclusions hey!!! Re-read my post and interpret it accordingly...

HOW do you know Everts was "going for it"? and JS7 wasn't?

My simple overview is this... JS7 crashed trying to keep up in moto 1(Yet he was cruising hey?), he didn't win either moto's, had a far slower best lap time and looked ragged (Oh forgot he was cruising hey?)... Now admit S72 was the better man!

BUT TEAM USA WAS THE BETTER TEAM, NOT JAMES AND THE TEAM AS YOU KEEP REFERRING... SIMPLY TEAM USA!!!

Pdub
Posts
1477
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
Wheaton, MD US
9/30/2009 4:13pm
Funny to me how the Brit blokes are suckling the Belgian (truly one of the greatest riders of all time), and not promoting one of their own... um... because... well, how did the British fare that year anyway?
WFO72
Posts
104
Joined
8/11/2009
Location
Gainesville, FL US
9/30/2009 4:16pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 2:26am
This stuff is great. Being there that day yes, Everts was fast and smooth and won the MX1 class,big deal. But like others have said, it's a TEAM event and JS was riding for the team. RC was there that day and I'm sure was bending JS's ear not to get got up in the crap with the Euro's and hand it too them. Bring home the trophy and that's what JS and the TEAM did. I mentioned to my British friends after the event that was the first time I ever saw JS not ride over the edge trying to win. And being from Florida, I have seen JS put in a hell of alot of moto's prior to that event.

But damn, Everts did rail the berms like he was glued to them. It was an impressive ride unlike when I seen him ride and get smoked at Unadilla years back at a national event.

This sunday 6 a.m. my eye's will be watching on the net. GO USA and may the best team win the Motocross Des Nations. Those of us on this site love this sport and let's remember that!
9/30/2009 4:18pm Edited Date/Time 9/30/2009 4:19pm
Pdub wrote:
Funny to me how the Brit blokes are suckling the Belgian (truly one of the greatest riders of all time), and not promoting one of their...
Funny to me how the Brit blokes are suckling the Belgian (truly one of the greatest riders of all time), and not promoting one of their own... um... because... well, how did the British fare that year anyway?
What on earth has how the Brits did got to do with this subject...
41NDT
Posts
855
Joined
3/19/2007
Location
AU
9/30/2009 4:19pm
From a TV point of view
Stewart did back it off when he realised he couldn't keep up with Stefan
Yes USA won a team event thanks to James keeping it on 2 wheels.
I thought Carolli's ride was the best though.
KAWboy14
Posts
6502
Joined
12/31/2007
Location
Austin, TX US
9/30/2009 4:21pm
teggers wrote:
- but the Americans did win the overall so hats off to them!

Cruised. I was there. Never jumped the uphill triple. Cruised.
mumhra wrote:
Jumping the uphill triple was not faster. If i remember correctly only a few guys tried it and it was slower then doubling it and then...
Jumping the uphill triple was not faster. If i remember correctly only a few guys tried it and it was slower then doubling it and then singling into that left hander.

I really wonder why Stewart made so many mistakes if he was only cruising. Lap after lap he looked like he was going to crash.
Get over it. He lost. And a few years later he admitted it. Wonder why you guys can't admit that.
he was messing up because the euro food made him sick?
jamma10
Posts
10573
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol GB
9/30/2009 4:31pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 2:26am
Pdub wrote:
Funny to me how the Brit blokes are suckling the Belgian (truly one of the greatest riders of all time), and not promoting one of their...
Funny to me how the Brit blokes are suckling the Belgian (truly one of the greatest riders of all time), and not promoting one of their own... um... because... well, how did the British fare that year anyway?
You guys like to lump all of us 'Euros' together, so a Brit backing up Everts is geographically about the same as a Texan backing Stewart.


The ironic thing - and Im not taking anything away from the USA because they're fugging incredible riders - is if Strijbos hadn't crashed in '06 and Boissierre hadn't suffered a puncture in '08, Team USA would have ended up 2nd both years...


GB came 6th in '06 by the way.


And PW80YAMAHARIDER or whatever your name is, wtf are you talking about individual results don't matter? Of course they matter, thats how the 'TEAM' earn points!
Pdub
Posts
1477
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
Wheaton, MD US
9/30/2009 4:48pm
Pdub wrote:
Funny to me how the Brit blokes are suckling the Belgian (truly one of the greatest riders of all time), and not promoting one of their...
Funny to me how the Brit blokes are suckling the Belgian (truly one of the greatest riders of all time), and not promoting one of their own... um... because... well, how did the British fare that year anyway?
jamma10 wrote:
You guys like to lump all of us 'Euros' together, so a Brit backing up Everts is geographically about the same as a Texan backing Stewart...
You guys like to lump all of us 'Euros' together, so a Brit backing up Everts is geographically about the same as a Texan backing Stewart.


The ironic thing - and Im not taking anything away from the USA because they're fugging incredible riders - is if Strijbos hadn't crashed in '06 and Boissierre hadn't suffered a puncture in '08, Team USA would have ended up 2nd both years...


GB came 6th in '06 by the way.


And PW80YAMAHARIDER or whatever your name is, wtf are you talking about individual results don't matter? Of course they matter, thats how the 'TEAM' earn points!
Ya, I'm just messin' with y'all. Wink
MX479Guy
Posts
2577
Joined
4/5/2009
Location
Atlantic Beach, FL US
9/30/2009 5:15pm
ShookOne wrote:
So he didn't win any. Ok thanks.
Traveling from COUNTRY to COUNTRY and winning 10 WORLD MOTOCROSS titles is no joke.

Try going to a different country each week and dealing with everything that comes with it and get back to us.

If James was that fast he could have beaten Everts easy right?

team or no team, he could have done it easy...but he wasn't not on that day.
ShookOne
Posts
86
Joined
1/8/2009
Location
Bodega Bay, CA US
9/30/2009 6:10pm
MX479Guy wrote:
Traveling from COUNTRY to COUNTRY and winning 10 WORLD MOTOCROSS titles is no joke. Try going to a different country each week and dealing with everything...
Traveling from COUNTRY to COUNTRY and winning 10 WORLD MOTOCROSS titles is no joke.

Try going to a different country each week and dealing with everything that comes with it and get back to us.

If James was that fast he could have beaten Everts easy right?

team or no team, he could have done it easy...but he wasn't not on that day.
Ya you know all about that cause you have sooo much experience doing it right. Adapting to SX after riding MX half the year is easy too, huh? GTFO of here SK and go back to non-moto.
pilotdude
Posts
3829
Joined
1/12/2009
Location
Vancouver, WA US
9/30/2009 7:18pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 2:27am
There has been a hell of a lot of talk about Stewart VS Everts in 06, but that is a somewhat strange thing for a GP fan to crow about. Some things to consider:

1. Stewart was in his first year on a 450 and finished FOURTH in the 450 Nationals behind RC, Windham, and Davi Millsaps. The Stewart of today is NOT the Stewart of 2006. So the discussion is really about how Everts did against the 2006 AMA FOURTH place finisher.

2. Stewart was thrust into the big-bike spotlight via Carmichael's injury only 2 weeks earlier at Glen Helen.

3. A Carmichael-Villopoto-Stewart team would have raced with a whole different dynamic than the Stewart-Villopoto-Tedesco team did. Racing with Carmichael always brought out the best in Stewart.

4. RC would probably have crushed Everts that day, but that is something we'll never know for fact. I would have bet very big money on it however.

5. Stewart almost certainly was instructed by DeCoster (and RC) to avoid AT ALL COSTS the kind of ragdoll crash that he was prone to in order to win the TEAM race.


the_wood109
Posts
3008
Joined
7/6/2008
Location
Edgewater, FL US
9/30/2009 8:42pm
Everts is a bad mofo. He was the best on that day hands down. Its not hard to admit it.

However, they didn't race each other enough for anyone to be able to say that Everts was faster. It was two motos, and he was faster in those motos. Everts had him covered on that day, under those circumstances. I would have loved to see them race each other more times.
jdbmx
Posts
34
Joined
6/17/2009
Location
Crondall GB
9/30/2009 11:47pm
pilotdude wrote:
There has been a hell of a lot of talk about Stewart VS Everts in 06, but that is a somewhat strange thing for a GP...
There has been a hell of a lot of talk about Stewart VS Everts in 06, but that is a somewhat strange thing for a GP fan to crow about. Some things to consider:

1. Stewart was in his first year on a 450 and finished FOURTH in the 450 Nationals behind RC, Windham, and Davi Millsaps. The Stewart of today is NOT the Stewart of 2006. So the discussion is really about how Everts did against the 2006 AMA FOURTH place finisher.

2. Stewart was thrust into the big-bike spotlight via Carmichael's injury only 2 weeks earlier at Glen Helen.

3. A Carmichael-Villopoto-Stewart team would have raced with a whole different dynamic than the Stewart-Villopoto-Tedesco team did. Racing with Carmichael always brought out the best in Stewart.

4. RC would probably have crushed Everts that day, but that is something we'll never know for fact. I would have bet very big money on it however.

5. Stewart almost certainly was instructed by DeCoster (and RC) to avoid AT ALL COSTS the kind of ragdoll crash that he was prone to in order to win the TEAM race.



5. Stewart almost certainly was instructed by DeCoster (and RC) to avoid AT ALL COSTS the kind of ragdoll crash that he was prone to in order to win the TEAM race.



But he has admitted since that Everts was quicker that day, " almost certainly " " probably ". Thats a lot of uncertainty from someone so sure.
teggers
Posts
3700
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Winter Park, FL US
10/1/2009 12:35am Edited Date/Time 10/1/2009 1:11am
teggers wrote:
- but the Americans did win the overall so hats off to them!

Cruised. I was there. Never jumped the uphill triple. Cruised.
mumhra wrote:
Jumping the uphill triple was not faster. If i remember correctly only a few guys tried it and it was slower then doubling it and then...
Jumping the uphill triple was not faster. If i remember correctly only a few guys tried it and it was slower then doubling it and then singling into that left hander.

I really wonder why Stewart made so many mistakes if he was only cruising. Lap after lap he looked like he was going to crash.
Get over it. He lost. And a few years later he admitted it. Wonder why you guys can't admit that.
Yes it was. Get real. That was a local pro jump here. Yah, if you miss the landing it will slow you down. Half the riders in that race couldn't win a Winter Am pro class here in FL. (It really is that weak) Look at the big picture ---- James did. He rode awesome that day. Nowhere near his natural speed, and he gets nailed for getting beaten (singularly) in a team race....and then SE says RC would have "at least" raced him for the individual..How insulting...That's just funny....They're not even on the same level.

Gee, wonder why he is not there this year? Please re-read line #1. You make the rules and then try to fry the riders who win by the rules.
Fucking insanity at some point. What would you do? Would you subject yourself to the endless bullshit?
If you were honest.
PaleBlue
Posts
1529
Joined
6/16/2009
Location
Essex GB
10/1/2009 12:45am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 2:27am
I find Yamharider4etc's posts quite touching really. He really, truly, deeply believes the drivel he is spouting! Laughing

SO much fun to wind up!!!
10/1/2009 1:01am Edited Date/Time 10/1/2009 1:05am
pilotdude wrote:
There has been a hell of a lot of talk about Stewart VS Everts in 06, but that is a somewhat strange thing for a GP...
There has been a hell of a lot of talk about Stewart VS Everts in 06, but that is a somewhat strange thing for a GP fan to crow about. Some things to consider:

1. Stewart was in his first year on a 450 and finished FOURTH in the 450 Nationals behind RC, Windham, and Davi Millsaps. The Stewart of today is NOT the Stewart of 2006. So the discussion is really about how Everts did against the 2006 AMA FOURTH place finisher.

2. Stewart was thrust into the big-bike spotlight via Carmichael's injury only 2 weeks earlier at Glen Helen.

3. A Carmichael-Villopoto-Stewart team would have raced with a whole different dynamic than the Stewart-Villopoto-Tedesco team did. Racing with Carmichael always brought out the best in Stewart.

4. RC would probably have crushed Everts that day, but that is something we'll never know for fact. I would have bet very big money on it however.

5. Stewart almost certainly was instructed by DeCoster (and RC) to avoid AT ALL COSTS the kind of ragdoll crash that he was prone to in order to win the TEAM race.


4th in the AMA that year... mmmm yeahh, but jeeeeze he didn't finish like 10 moto's! James was rocking in his rookie year (Finishing first and second in moto's) and the only one to beat Ricky all year...

but at the mxdn... he could'nt keep up with an old man!
Fraser
Posts
780
Joined
9/12/2008
Location
Leics GB
10/1/2009 1:10am
WTF is "breh"???? Is that "brah" with an english accent or something??? And let me tell you what I know deep down...Three things: -Moto is the...
WTF is "breh"???? Is that "brah" with an english accent or something???

And let me tell you what I know deep down...Three things:

-Moto is the best sport on the planet
-RC is the best ever
-And James Stewart (TEAM USA) won the MXdN 2006

You can take that to the bank.

Well we could, if yours hadn't all gone bankrupt and ruined the world's economy.

What you all need to accept is that JS lied on that video. I was there and saw him lose on the track. I was also in that press conference and saw the embarassed smirk on his face when he claimed he'd 'taken one for the team'. Not a single person there believed him. He's since admitted he was utterly beaten by a better rider on that day. Stefan humiliated him, he wasn't used to that and didn't know how to handle it. He should have been man enough to admit what happened there and then. AS it was he didn't, and Stefan had to set the record straight.

That was also the day that Cairoli showed his true potential. The mid-race nac-nac was an unbelievable sight, the crowd noise and atmosphere unreal. It was the motocross des nations, not the USA vs Europe motocross. Unfortunately though it felt like that at times due to the way the US team behaved (and still do). Walk round the pits and all the GP stars are mixed in together, you can go and speak to whoever you like, everyone's happy to chat. Cairoli even came up to the fairground on the saturday night to join in the (somewhat drunken) fun. Contrast that with Team USA's fort knox pit area, their special dispensation on noise/fuel/drugs tests and you can see the 'them and us' thing being entirely of their own making.
The pit area for Donington last year was even more ridiculous. You needed special VIP passes to get into the monster energy pit area, then an extra pass to get anywhere near Team USA.
No-one else does all this, why do they think its neccessary? I'd love to see them relax a bit and join in with the fun and the atmosphere of this special event like all the other teams do. That way the European fans would respect them a lot more, maybe even grow to like them.
jamma10
Posts
10573
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol GB
10/1/2009 1:24am
teggers wrote:
- but the Americans did win the overall so hats off to them!

Cruised. I was there. Never jumped the uphill triple. Cruised.
mumhra wrote:
Jumping the uphill triple was not faster. If i remember correctly only a few guys tried it and it was slower then doubling it and then...
Jumping the uphill triple was not faster. If i remember correctly only a few guys tried it and it was slower then doubling it and then singling into that left hander.

I really wonder why Stewart made so many mistakes if he was only cruising. Lap after lap he looked like he was going to crash.
Get over it. He lost. And a few years later he admitted it. Wonder why you guys can't admit that.
teggers wrote:
Yes it was. Get real. That was a local pro jump here. Yah, if you miss the landing it will slow you down. Half the riders...
Yes it was. Get real. That was a local pro jump here. Yah, if you miss the landing it will slow you down. Half the riders in that race couldn't win a Winter Am pro class here in FL. (It really is that weak) Look at the big picture ---- James did. He rode awesome that day. Nowhere near his natural speed, and he gets nailed for getting beaten (singularly) in a team race....and then SE says RC would have "at least" raced him for the individual..How insulting...That's just funny....They're not even on the same level.

Gee, wonder why he is not there this year? Please re-read line #1. You make the rules and then try to fry the riders who win by the rules.
Fucking insanity at some point. What would you do? Would you subject yourself to the endless bullshit?
If you were honest.
The only insanity is that most American fans can not and will not show some modesty and respect towards anyone but their own.

PilotDude just pointed out that Stewart came 4th in the AMA in '06... so why is it so hard to say 'yeah ok, Everts had the measure of him that day'? Stewart IS probably even better now, but at the time he was the new Superstar of Motocross and you guys know it, he was chosen above the others, which is why some of you simply refuse to accept it.

Perhaps the most significant thing about '06 is that Everts also beat Stewart in the first race, straight up, before Stewart knew how the rest of the day was going to pan out.

I don't believe us 'Euros' should cling on to that day too much, it happened three years ago and Everts has retired now. But when RC beat Everts in '03 and when Villopoto crushed the entire field at Budds Creek we are able to say the best man won. Americans it seems, are not.

Maybe we need to watch this, just to even things up...
teggers
Posts
3700
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Winter Park, FL US
10/1/2009 1:27am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 2:27am
Well we could, if yours hadn't all gone bankrupt and ruined the world's economy.


Look in Mirror.

Lied on the video.


Excellent.


Embarrassed smirk.


Awesome.


Not a single person there believed him.


You just lied. (I was there - I know James' riding as good as his Dad.) Yes, he took one.


As far as USA's pits....there were HUNDREDS of people (maybe a thousand) trying to get a view of USA pits (mainly RC). When RC arrived, there were 40-50 kids chasing his car from the front gate. Across the pit lane (5 meters away) in Evert's' pits, there was no barrier and no people. Please don't be a drama queen. It was what it was.


There comes a point when the bullshit (or denial) get's so deep you can't breath.
jamma10
Posts
10573
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol GB
10/1/2009 1:30am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 2:27am
GP fans have been able to walk around and chat easily to Stefan Everts for 10 years+ .


RC has been to England twice during that time.


There were ALOT of fans around Everts at the end of the day.


Plus, if no one paid any attention to the US team you would be even more put out!
teggers
Posts
3700
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Winter Park, FL US
10/1/2009 1:39am Edited Date/Time 10/1/2009 1:54am
MXoN Third Turn Tony Cairoli - Right click and View Image...than click to zoom in.

Post a reply to: Video re-run: MXDN 2006 “Everts Last Stand”

The Latest