How Long Before Feld Steals Karnow's Title Sponsor?

ns503
Profile picture for user ns503
Posts
4608
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NS Toolies, CA
ns503 10/26/2022 9:47am
10/26/2022 9:47am
fourfourone wrote:
Giving young females an easy platform to take of their clothes off for money and then taking a percentage is not exploitation?

ns503 wrote:
Is YouTube exploiting their content creators?
fourfourone wrote:
Not even in the same ball park.
Yes, it is.

Well, maybe not - could be that OF creators get a way better deal for themselves than YT creators.

I.e., less exploiting.
1
TeamGreen
Profile picture for user TeamGreen
Posts
37366
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
TeamGreen 10/26/2022 9:55am
10/26/2022 9:55am Edited Date/Time 10/26/2022 9:57am
peelout wrote:
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging...
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging deep to find it. you literally can not see anything on the home page. first you have to have an account, then after you search for the bad stuff, you still can't see anything without subscribing/purchasing a plan to view it. by that point it's no longer an accident, you have to go out of you way to access anything on OF.

you can literally find worse shit on Google. hell, sometimes i get some really bad shit with a seemingly innocent search. YouTube, IG, SnapChat, TikTok, Twitter... all those platforms it's easier to access "porn" than OF.

get the fuck outta' here
Well, that escalated quickly! Grinning

I’m gonna have to agree with my friend, Peely, here: we’ve got our own “Morality Police” that’re calling for CENSORSHIP based on false claims and lack of reality.

Are there some naked people doing some crazy shit on OF?
Sure!
Can you just pull it up…WITHOUT logging in and CREATING an account?
Uh, no.
(This is where someone is gonna make claims based on images others have -shared- on the web; so, how did they get those images? Oh, my! Do they have an acct?)
Blink
All the Torches & Pitchforks are based on what people THINK they know.

Then there’s those spewing crap in the face of Only Fans for merely attempting to market their site to sports fans for the purpose of expanding the base of…
Sport Fans…
Which, as I recall reading years ago…
Was the original intent of it’s creators.
11
4
MotoCosmo
Profile picture for user MotoCosmo
Posts
74
Joined
8/29/2022
Location
Bishop, CA, USA
MotoCosmo 10/26/2022 10:06am
10/26/2022 10:06am
Sandusky26 wrote:
I've been dating my hand for years and I turned out alright.
You're in luck, a little birdie told me the new RM-Z will be coming with a pull start!
8
1
whyZ
Profile picture for user whyZ
Posts
1158
Joined
4/15/2009
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
whyZ 10/26/2022 10:10am
10/26/2022 10:10am
peelout wrote:
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging...
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging deep to find it. you literally can not see anything on the home page. first you have to have an account, then after you search for the bad stuff, you still can't see anything without subscribing/purchasing a plan to view it. by that point it's no longer an accident, you have to go out of you way to access anything on OF.

you can literally find worse shit on Google. hell, sometimes i get some really bad shit with a seemingly innocent search. YouTube, IG, SnapChat, TikTok, Twitter... all those platforms it's easier to access "porn" than OF.

get the fuck outta' here
TeamGreen wrote:
Well, that escalated quickly! :lol: I’m gonna have to agree with my friend, Peely, here: we’ve got our own “Morality Police” that’re calling for CENSORSHIP based...
Well, that escalated quickly! Grinning

I’m gonna have to agree with my friend, Peely, here: we’ve got our own “Morality Police” that’re calling for CENSORSHIP based on false claims and lack of reality.

Are there some naked people doing some crazy shit on OF?
Sure!
Can you just pull it up…WITHOUT logging in and CREATING an account?
Uh, no.
(This is where someone is gonna make claims based on images others have -shared- on the web; so, how did they get those images? Oh, my! Do they have an acct?)
Blink
All the Torches & Pitchforks are based on what people THINK they know.

Then there’s those spewing crap in the face of Only Fans for merely attempting to market their site to sports fans for the purpose of expanding the base of…
Sport Fans…
Which, as I recall reading years ago…
Was the original intent of it’s creators.
Educators are indoctrinating grade school children on gender identity, with pushing surgical trans gendering and we're worried about moto sponsors lack of morality?
7
10

The Shop

See All »
agn5008
Profile picture for user agn5008
Posts
2031
Joined
3/8/2021
Location
PA, PA, USA
Fantasy
66th
agn5008 10/26/2022 10:22am
10/26/2022 10:22am
R VanKamp77 wrote:
Taking advantage of gullible young girls fetish for being desired and addiction to status by offering them a seamless platform to expose themselves is absolutely exploitation...
Taking advantage of gullible young girls fetish for being desired and addiction to status by offering them a seamless platform to expose themselves is absolutely exploitation. Anyone who disagrees is checked out of reality. Nevermind the underage girls problem they have.
agn5008 wrote:
So you consider someone doing something completely under their own free power to make money is exploitation? These girls are given 100% free reign over their...
So you consider someone doing something completely under their own free power to make money is exploitation? These girls are given 100% free reign over their choice to do this, the type of content they produce, and amount of money they charge. You consider that exploitation? And yeah, of course onlyfans has to make a profit. It would be a pretty awful business model if they didn’t.

Shit, I better have a conversation with my employer. They make me do stuff I don’t wanna do all the time. I must be getting exploited big time! I must be a victim!
fourfourone wrote:
#facepalm
Are you gonna show proof where onlyfans is exploiting women? Or just use silly hashtags to make you feel superior?
1
3
fourfourone
Profile picture for user fourfourone
Posts
3046
Joined
10/14/2017
Location
86oh, CT, USA
fourfourone 10/26/2022 10:28am
10/26/2022 10:28am
agn5008 wrote:
So you consider someone doing something completely under their own free power to make money is exploitation? These girls are given 100% free reign over their...
So you consider someone doing something completely under their own free power to make money is exploitation? These girls are given 100% free reign over their choice to do this, the type of content they produce, and amount of money they charge. You consider that exploitation? And yeah, of course onlyfans has to make a profit. It would be a pretty awful business model if they didn’t.

Shit, I better have a conversation with my employer. They make me do stuff I don’t wanna do all the time. I must be getting exploited big time! I must be a victim!
fourfourone wrote:
#facepalm
agn5008 wrote:
Are you gonna show proof where onlyfans is exploiting women? Or just use silly hashtags to make you feel superior?
It's been explained a few times. I know you can't read that well but it's clear as day.
13
H.E.penyypacker432 10/26/2022 10:35am
10/26/2022 10:35am
fourfourone wrote:
It's been explained a few times. I know you can't read that well but it's clear as day.
You've got a real loose definition of exploitation. You seem like the type to call assault anytime something goes south. Its been explained to you a few times that it isn't exploitation. You just can't seem to wrap your head around the fact that some girls actually can think for themselves and are cool with showing there warlocks for a few bucks. More power to them. Wish people would pay to see me crank the hog on camera...
4
3
agn5008
Profile picture for user agn5008
Posts
2031
Joined
3/8/2021
Location
PA, PA, USA
Fantasy
66th
agn5008 10/26/2022 10:36am
10/26/2022 10:36am
fourfourone wrote:
#facepalm
agn5008 wrote:
Are you gonna show proof where onlyfans is exploiting women? Or just use silly hashtags to make you feel superior?
fourfourone wrote:
It's been explained a few times. I know you can't read that well but it's clear as day.
😂
1
2
soggy
Profile picture for user soggy
Posts
8853
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
soggy 10/26/2022 10:43am
10/26/2022 10:43am
fourfourone wrote:
#facepalm
agn5008 wrote:
Are you gonna show proof where onlyfans is exploiting women? Or just use silly hashtags to make you feel superior?
fourfourone wrote:
It's been explained a few times. I know you can't read that well but it's clear as day.
The only people being exploited are the horny people that can’t get enough of it. You’ve made no good argument for how the content creators are exploited and you know it. Spotify and YouTube actually exploit the creators.
2
5
fourfourone
Profile picture for user fourfourone
Posts
3046
Joined
10/14/2017
Location
86oh, CT, USA
fourfourone 10/26/2022 10:55am
10/26/2022 10:55am
fourfourone wrote:
It's been explained a few times. I know you can't read that well but it's clear as day.
H.E.penyypacker432 wrote:
You've got a real loose definition of exploitation. You seem like the type to call assault anytime something goes south. Its been explained to you a...
You've got a real loose definition of exploitation. You seem like the type to call assault anytime something goes south. Its been explained to you a few times that it isn't exploitation. You just can't seem to wrap your head around the fact that some girls actually can think for themselves and are cool with showing there warlocks for a few bucks. More power to them. Wish people would pay to see me crank the hog on camera...
blah blah blah. Try again.
7
soggy
Profile picture for user soggy
Posts
8853
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
soggy 10/26/2022 10:57am
10/26/2022 10:57am
fourfourone wrote:
blah blah blah. Try again.
Typical response when you know you’re wrong. It’s ok to admit it.
2
3
Rosso391 10/26/2022 11:27am
10/26/2022 11:27am
526 wrote:
Billion Dollar Company they should be all over that soonSad
Rosso391 wrote:
Its a billion dollar whore sponsor essentially. I'm sure Feld and AMA will stop him from having that on his bike. Honestly I'm glad the guy...
Its a billion dollar whore sponsor essentially. I'm sure Feld and AMA will stop him from having that on his bike. Honestly I'm glad the guy got some support. But don't use THAT company. Kids watch motocross...KIDS. And kids don't need to be influenced towards that kind of content. That's why he wont be on the line with those graphics. He should know better than to bring a porn streaming company into motocross. How is it any different then if say, Rockstar husky gets PRNHB as the new yellow colored title sponsor on their bike? Its pretty messed up. That content doesn't need to be a sponsor on anyone's bike or vehicle. Everyone knows they banned tobacco and beer sponsors a long time ago. What makes anyone think its okay to put a porn company on their bikes? Its baffling.

edit*: If the sport was a 18+ sport, this wouldn't be an issue. Its a family sport, and it doesn't belong in this sport.
yak651 wrote:
Are you ok with the cancer water sponsors in front of your “kids”??
Baseless claim. Next..
4
str8line
Profile picture for user str8line
Posts
3651
Joined
9/20/2018
Location
Sandy, UT, USA
str8line 10/26/2022 11:31am
10/26/2022 11:31am
Broseph wrote:
Welcome to Bang Bros Supercross! Brought to you by Pornhub. 15 minutes on Pornhub could save you 18 years (or more!) on your child support.

LOL. Nice.
2
Rosso391 10/26/2022 11:32am
10/26/2022 11:32am
peelout wrote:
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging...
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging deep to find it. you literally can not see anything on the home page. first you have to have an account, then after you search for the bad stuff, you still can't see anything without subscribing/purchasing a plan to view it. by that point it's no longer an accident, you have to go out of you way to access anything on OF.

you can literally find worse shit on Google. hell, sometimes i get some really bad shit with a seemingly innocent search. YouTube, IG, SnapChat, TikTok, Twitter... all those platforms it's easier to access "porn" than OF.

get the fuck outta' here
TeamGreen wrote:
Well, that escalated quickly! :lol: I’m gonna have to agree with my friend, Peely, here: we’ve got our own “Morality Police” that’re calling for CENSORSHIP based...
Well, that escalated quickly! Grinning

I’m gonna have to agree with my friend, Peely, here: we’ve got our own “Morality Police” that’re calling for CENSORSHIP based on false claims and lack of reality.

Are there some naked people doing some crazy shit on OF?
Sure!
Can you just pull it up…WITHOUT logging in and CREATING an account?
Uh, no.
(This is where someone is gonna make claims based on images others have -shared- on the web; so, how did they get those images? Oh, my! Do they have an acct?)
Blink
All the Torches & Pitchforks are based on what people THINK they know.

Then there’s those spewing crap in the face of Only Fans for merely attempting to market their site to sports fans for the purpose of expanding the base of…
Sport Fans…
Which, as I recall reading years ago…
Was the original intent of it’s creators.
Unbelievable you guys are trying to justify porn sponsors for a family sport. Yes you need an account to view. But seriously, you are paving a direct route to view it. How hard is it to google a top stars onlyfans acct and find it for free somewhere? Its everywhere. Its disgusting to think some of you would be fine with OF graphics on the KTM Challenge bikes. No morals left for the kids.
16
early
Profile picture for user early
Posts
10017
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
early 10/26/2022 11:36am
10/26/2022 11:36am
Rosso391 wrote:
Unbelievable you guys are trying to justify porn sponsors for a family sport. Yes you need an account to view. But seriously, you are paving a...
Unbelievable you guys are trying to justify porn sponsors for a family sport. Yes you need an account to view. But seriously, you are paving a direct route to view it. How hard is it to google a top stars onlyfans acct and find it for free somewhere? Its everywhere. Its disgusting to think some of you would be fine with OF graphics on the KTM Challenge bikes. No morals left for the kids.
**clutching at pearls intensifies**
5
5
uncledaddy69
Profile picture for user uncledaddy69
Posts
2547
Joined
4/2/2011
Location
Huntington Beach, CA, USA
uncledaddy69 10/26/2022 11:36am
10/26/2022 11:36am
peelout wrote:
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging...
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging deep to find it. you literally can not see anything on the home page. first you have to have an account, then after you search for the bad stuff, you still can't see anything without subscribing/purchasing a plan to view it. by that point it's no longer an accident, you have to go out of you way to access anything on OF.

you can literally find worse shit on Google. hell, sometimes i get some really bad shit with a seemingly innocent search. YouTube, IG, SnapChat, TikTok, Twitter... all those platforms it's easier to access "porn" than OF.

get the fuck outta' here
The “woke” crowd is typically very pro sex work. I think they would be the ones encouraging this.

Not attacking you at all, because I completely agree with the rest of your post.
1
3
early
Profile picture for user early
Posts
10017
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
early 10/26/2022 11:42am
10/26/2022 11:42am
uncledaddy69 wrote:
The “woke” crowd is typically very pro sex work. I think they would be the ones encouraging this. Not attacking you at all, because I completely...
The “woke” crowd is typically very pro sex work. I think they would be the ones encouraging this.

Not attacking you at all, because I completely agree with the rest of your post.
If your definition of "woke" is white knighting for camgirls that don't want your help or being the purveyor of cancel culture then the Ban Only Fans crowd is "woke".
4

Pit Row

See All »
301w
Profile picture for user 301w
Posts
123
Joined
6/24/2011
Location
Pala, CA, USA
301w 10/26/2022 11:52am
10/26/2022 11:52am
Herrin
1
1
thatswhathappens 10/26/2022 11:55am
10/26/2022 11:55am Edited Date/Time 10/26/2022 12:21pm
Some of you guys must really hate privateers, huh? Karnow got fucked last year with his sponsor ghosting him, dude made the absolute best out of the absolute worst situation. That should be getting the spotlight here.

Besides, if you give your kid access to the internet these days, they probably already know what OF is, and will just play dumb acting like they don’t know so they can avoid an awkward conversation with their parents, lol.
5
2
Madmax31
Profile picture for user Madmax31
Posts
2143
Joined
1/7/2009
Location
Cincinnati, OH, USA
Fantasy
183rd
Madmax31 10/26/2022 12:19pm
10/26/2022 12:19pm
526 wrote:
Billion Dollar Company they should be all over that soonSad
Rosso391 wrote:
Its a billion dollar whore sponsor essentially. I'm sure Feld and AMA will stop him from having that on his bike. Honestly I'm glad the guy...
Its a billion dollar whore sponsor essentially. I'm sure Feld and AMA will stop him from having that on his bike. Honestly I'm glad the guy got some support. But don't use THAT company. Kids watch motocross...KIDS. And kids don't need to be influenced towards that kind of content. That's why he wont be on the line with those graphics. He should know better than to bring a porn streaming company into motocross. How is it any different then if say, Rockstar husky gets PRNHB as the new yellow colored title sponsor on their bike? Its pretty messed up. That content doesn't need to be a sponsor on anyone's bike or vehicle. Everyone knows they banned tobacco and beer sponsors a long time ago. What makes anyone think its okay to put a porn company on their bikes? Its baffling.

edit*: If the sport was a 18+ sport, this wouldn't be an issue. Its a family sport, and it doesn't belong in this sport.
You sir are a loon.
2
1
Hammer 663s
Profile picture for user Hammer 663s
Posts
3111
Joined
6/2/2016
Location
Forest Grove, OR, USA
Hammer 663s 10/26/2022 12:27pm
10/26/2022 12:27pm Edited Date/Time 10/26/2022 12:30pm
Boy I miss Tumblr. They'd have been a hell of a sponsor. But they dropped porn and bam, out of business in less than 6 months.

Interesting that this is almost solely a US discussion. Tight @ss CT and MN dudes whose ancestors were too scared to go west, young man. Euros not chiming in - they just look at us and shake their heads. Hell, UK Channel 4 is running a documentary called "My Massive C0ck". ON PUBLIC TV, gasp!

Raise your kids to recognize gray. It ain't all black and white fellas. I heard my 16 YO tell his buddy the other day "yes, I have an interest in a girl. She's orange and black and wears #500. That's where my time goes." Proud papa moment.

No skin in the game here, don't really care. Energy drinks, booze, pot, boobs. All "sins" in someone's eyes.
5
2
Sandusky26
Profile picture for user Sandusky26
Posts
3498
Joined
7/28/2021
Location
Eastern, NC, USA
Sandusky26 10/26/2022 12:34pm
10/26/2022 12:34pm
There’s a few privateers that have GF’s with only fans. My buddy told me of one, I didn’t believe him so I had to check it out myself.

I’m fuckin pissed and I want my 10 bucks back.
4
2
Dirty Points 10/26/2022 12:40pm
10/26/2022 12:40pm Edited Date/Time 10/26/2022 1:03pm
ns503 wrote:
Is YouTube exploiting their content creators?
fourfourone wrote:
Not even in the same ball park.
ns503 wrote:
Yes, it is.

Well, maybe not - could be that OF creators get a way better deal for themselves than YT creators.

I.e., less exploiting.
LOL.

Is there anybody here that is under the impression that Monster Energy Supercross Girls have been just showing up voluntarily to races, with no knowledge of their sexual marketing, fully unpaid in that regard in their typical full spandex and pleather outfits?
1
1
bvm111
Profile picture for user bvm111
Posts
10138
Joined
7/1/2008
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
bvm111 10/26/2022 12:41pm
10/26/2022 12:41pm Edited Date/Time 10/26/2022 12:41pm
fourfourone wrote:
It's been explained a few times. I know you can't read that well but it's clear as day.
You sure seem to know a lot about OF, Porn, and the exploitation of women.... why is that?
4
H.E.penyypacker432 10/26/2022 12:42pm
10/26/2022 12:42pm
Rosso391 wrote:
Unbelievable you guys are trying to justify porn sponsors for a family sport. Yes you need an account to view. But seriously, you are paving a...
Unbelievable you guys are trying to justify porn sponsors for a family sport. Yes you need an account to view. But seriously, you are paving a direct route to view it. How hard is it to google a top stars onlyfans acct and find it for free somewhere? Its everywhere. Its disgusting to think some of you would be fine with OF graphics on the KTM Challenge bikes. No morals left for the kids.
Becomes a business when you're racing for pay checks. No longer a family sport past Lorettas. Sure families help but its ultimately on the rider to make something of themselves once they hit the pro ranks. OF logo isn't going to be on KTM challenge bikes. Its on a 15th place guys bike that you'll never see unless you follow him. Unbelievable how this such a hard concept for some of you to grasp. Were you throwing this big of a tantrum when twisted tea came into the sport? Rather have my kid figure out what OF is before he thinks its sick to slam twisted teas at any time. Its almost like if you're a decent parent your kids would know better. But hey you keep on goin brotha
2
3
fourfourone
Profile picture for user fourfourone
Posts
3046
Joined
10/14/2017
Location
86oh, CT, USA
fourfourone 10/26/2022 12:43pm
10/26/2022 12:43pm
fourfourone wrote:
It's been explained a few times. I know you can't read that well but it's clear as day.
bvm111 wrote:
You sure seem to know a lot about OF, Porn, and the exploitation of women.... why is that?
That's one sad attempt to try and be funny.
6
TeamGreen
Profile picture for user TeamGreen
Posts
37366
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
TeamGreen 10/26/2022 12:44pm
10/26/2022 12:44pm
peelout wrote:
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging...
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging deep to find it. you literally can not see anything on the home page. first you have to have an account, then after you search for the bad stuff, you still can't see anything without subscribing/purchasing a plan to view it. by that point it's no longer an accident, you have to go out of you way to access anything on OF.

you can literally find worse shit on Google. hell, sometimes i get some really bad shit with a seemingly innocent search. YouTube, IG, SnapChat, TikTok, Twitter... all those platforms it's easier to access "porn" than OF.

get the fuck outta' here
TeamGreen wrote:
Well, that escalated quickly! :lol: I’m gonna have to agree with my friend, Peely, here: we’ve got our own “Morality Police” that’re calling for CENSORSHIP based...
Well, that escalated quickly! Grinning

I’m gonna have to agree with my friend, Peely, here: we’ve got our own “Morality Police” that’re calling for CENSORSHIP based on false claims and lack of reality.

Are there some naked people doing some crazy shit on OF?
Sure!
Can you just pull it up…WITHOUT logging in and CREATING an account?
Uh, no.
(This is where someone is gonna make claims based on images others have -shared- on the web; so, how did they get those images? Oh, my! Do they have an acct?)
Blink
All the Torches & Pitchforks are based on what people THINK they know.

Then there’s those spewing crap in the face of Only Fans for merely attempting to market their site to sports fans for the purpose of expanding the base of…
Sport Fans…
Which, as I recall reading years ago…
Was the original intent of it’s creators.
Rosso391 wrote:
Unbelievable you guys are trying to justify porn sponsors for a family sport. Yes you need an account to view. But seriously, you are paving a...
Unbelievable you guys are trying to justify porn sponsors for a family sport. Yes you need an account to view. But seriously, you are paving a direct route to view it. How hard is it to google a top stars onlyfans acct and find it for free somewhere? Its everywhere. Its disgusting to think some of you would be fine with OF graphics on the KTM Challenge bikes. No morals left for the kids.
Dude, did you see/hear Karnow’s comments on OF’s intent with marketing thru him?

Also, from your TV to YouTube to typical Social Media: if you are as concerned as you seem to be? You’ve got MUCH bigger problems than OF.
2
2
MotoTribology 10/26/2022 12:44pm
10/26/2022 12:44pm
peelout wrote:
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging...
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging deep to find it. you literally can not see anything on the home page. first you have to have an account, then after you search for the bad stuff, you still can't see anything without subscribing/purchasing a plan to view it. by that point it's no longer an accident, you have to go out of you way to access anything on OF.

you can literally find worse shit on Google. hell, sometimes i get some really bad shit with a seemingly innocent search. YouTube, IG, SnapChat, TikTok, Twitter... all those platforms it's easier to access "porn" than OF.

get the fuck outta' here
TeamGreen wrote:
Well, that escalated quickly! :lol: I’m gonna have to agree with my friend, Peely, here: we’ve got our own “Morality Police” that’re calling for CENSORSHIP based...
Well, that escalated quickly! Grinning

I’m gonna have to agree with my friend, Peely, here: we’ve got our own “Morality Police” that’re calling for CENSORSHIP based on false claims and lack of reality.

Are there some naked people doing some crazy shit on OF?
Sure!
Can you just pull it up…WITHOUT logging in and CREATING an account?
Uh, no.
(This is where someone is gonna make claims based on images others have -shared- on the web; so, how did they get those images? Oh, my! Do they have an acct?)
Blink
All the Torches & Pitchforks are based on what people THINK they know.

Then there’s those spewing crap in the face of Only Fans for merely attempting to market their site to sports fans for the purpose of expanding the base of…
Sport Fans…
Which, as I recall reading years ago…
Was the original intent of it’s creators.
Rosso391 wrote:
Unbelievable you guys are trying to justify porn sponsors for a family sport. Yes you need an account to view. But seriously, you are paving a...
Unbelievable you guys are trying to justify porn sponsors for a family sport. Yes you need an account to view. But seriously, you are paving a direct route to view it. How hard is it to google a top stars onlyfans acct and find it for free somewhere? Its everywhere. Its disgusting to think some of you would be fine with OF graphics on the KTM Challenge bikes. No morals left for the kids.
nrosso391
↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓
1
2

Post a reply to: How Long Before Feld Steals Karnow's Title Sponsor?