Paging DC

Zoom
Posts
1408
Joined
10/21/2012
Location
Cypress, TX, USA
1/6/2022 9:43am
To all you vet riders complaining about the lack of vet classes at the worlds largest amateur event....

You know there is a Vet World Championship at Glen Helen every year. You can race your age group with whatever letter of the alphabet you want.
1
7
crusher773
Posts
2025
Joined
12/23/2009
Location
Coweta, OK, USA
1/6/2022 9:49am
Zoom wrote:
To all you vet riders complaining about the lack of vet classes at the worlds largest amateur event.... You know there is a Vet World Championship...
To all you vet riders complaining about the lack of vet classes at the worlds largest amateur event....

You know there is a Vet World Championship at Glen Helen every year. You can race your age group with whatever letter of the alphabet you want.
Yeah cause we've all heard how great GH is right? I'm not going all the way to the west coast for that crappy event.
7
3
yak651
Posts
8993
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI, USA
Fantasy
1/6/2022 9:51am
Zoom wrote:
To all you vet riders complaining about the lack of vet classes at the worlds largest amateur event.... You know there is a Vet World Championship...
To all you vet riders complaining about the lack of vet classes at the worlds largest amateur event....

You know there is a Vet World Championship at Glen Helen every year. You can race your age group with whatever letter of the alphabet you want.
Yep race the "world" vets and you can go in whatever practice you want and race whatever class you want no matter what your "normal" classification is. You get to find out how many laps you are racing by seeing the white flag as you come around the finish line, you can expect to maybe or maybe not have flaggers, you can expect the crew running to make up the rules as you go. Yep there are alternatives to LL, you just might have to change your expectations...
3
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13354
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
1/6/2022 10:04am Edited Date/Time 1/6/2022 10:04am
In some ways I am glad I was never good enough to be good enough for this event. And to know it.
8
1

The Shop

McG194
Posts
4139
Joined
9/7/2017
Location
Palm Coast, FL, USA
1/6/2022 10:05am
Zoom wrote:
To all you vet riders complaining about the lack of vet classes at the worlds largest amateur event.... You know there is a Vet World Championship...
To all you vet riders complaining about the lack of vet classes at the worlds largest amateur event....

You know there is a Vet World Championship at Glen Helen every year. You can race your age group with whatever letter of the alphabet you want.
Did you see that guy that had no business being on the track with Allessi? I'm that guy, I have no business being on a track with Allessi.

1
2
DC
Posts
3889
Joined
5/1/2009
Location
Morgantown, WV, USA
1/6/2022 10:19am
Meister wrote:
Looking for clarification on the new +30 name change for Lorettas. Is it truly a b/c class or still dictated by the ama point rule?
I've been out all week on lockdown, I will look into what happened here and why, and see if there is a more suitable class structure to put forward.

I do not personally make the rules for the supplemental classes at Loretta Lynn's, it's a group of folks including MX Sports officials, AMA officials, regional event promoters and input from the participants. The vet classes are always an issue because there has to be a balance between lifetime fast guys (some of whom were once pros) and amateur vet racers who want to also participate in the national. It's not as easy as just adding a class. The event is already at full capacity and we don't want to add days or shorten motos, or get into the whole qualifying thing at the national.

Hopefully we can find the right balance here, as this has not been as well-received as anyone might have hoped.

DC
Racer X


12
3
JBlain619
Posts
1855
Joined
6/10/2010
Location
Severna Park, MD, USA
1/6/2022 10:35am
DC wrote:
I've been out all week on lockdown, I will look into what happened here and why, and see if there is a more suitable class structure...
I've been out all week on lockdown, I will look into what happened here and why, and see if there is a more suitable class structure to put forward.

I do not personally make the rules for the supplemental classes at Loretta Lynn's, it's a group of folks including MX Sports officials, AMA officials, regional event promoters and input from the participants. The vet classes are always an issue because there has to be a balance between lifetime fast guys (some of whom were once pros) and amateur vet racers who want to also participate in the national. It's not as easy as just adding a class. The event is already at full capacity and we don't want to add days or shorten motos, or get into the whole qualifying thing at the national.

Hopefully we can find the right balance here, as this has not been as well-received as anyone might have hoped.

DC
Racer X


So is there a possible change in the works for the 2022 program?
5
team186
Posts
17
Joined
8/22/2009
Location
Danville, KY, USA
1/6/2022 11:30am Edited Date/Time 1/6/2022 11:32am
Simple solution but 1st. As it is now a 28 yr old A rider has 25+ and Pro Sport. Might not need to be in pro sport anymore I get it. 25+ is his class but only one to ride. A 37 yr old ex A rider used to have 25 and 30. Probably 25+ has passed him by so it all about 30+ for a shot to LL. Now doesn’t have that it’s 25 and pro sport until he hits 40+ = no chance now 30 is only B/C and do we really want 35+ guy (mid-pack A experience) in pro sport? Then in 40 45 50 B/C guys don’t want A guys or ex top pros A guys want sportsman former pros don’t want sportsman 40 and 50 guys don’t want to be forced to ride 25 or pro sport and on and on….

So why not make vet classes age specific just like all youth classes historically have been. No open age no B/C no sportsman. Once you hit 18 or 25 you race in your age class. Riders in 10 year age range will look alike probably ride alike act alike generally weigh alike scrub or not scrub alike. Just like if you showed up to run in a 10K or play in a senior tennis tournament or sign up for a senior golf scramble etc

Make age splits like this

College boy 18-24 (or 17-19)
Vet 1 25-29 (or 20-29)
Vet 2 30-39
Vet3 40-49
Vet4 50+

We’ll then it’ll be I only got one class blah blah. At the local level a vet can then ride the 250 or 450 A B or C class if they need two classes for there weekend fix.

But at LL fix all the problems by making the vet racing the national a one class gig like the pee wee kids. Then with these age splits 85% of vets will probably get in or chances highly increased and we’ll have like aged guys racing like aged guys regardless of A B C status. These 4 vet class splits could be expanded to to A/B and C only but not at LL. 4 vet classes are the standard at LL and would continue to be with these age range splits.

Thx
Steve Hunter
MX retired
Ken-f’ing-tucky USA

4
9
1/6/2022 11:31am
DC wrote:
I've been out all week on lockdown, I will look into what happened here and why, and see if there is a more suitable class structure...
I've been out all week on lockdown, I will look into what happened here and why, and see if there is a more suitable class structure to put forward.

I do not personally make the rules for the supplemental classes at Loretta Lynn's, it's a group of folks including MX Sports officials, AMA officials, regional event promoters and input from the participants. The vet classes are always an issue because there has to be a balance between lifetime fast guys (some of whom were once pros) and amateur vet racers who want to also participate in the national. It's not as easy as just adding a class. The event is already at full capacity and we don't want to add days or shorten motos, or get into the whole qualifying thing at the national.

Hopefully we can find the right balance here, as this has not been as well-received as anyone might have hoped.

DC
Racer X


DC, I am a 31 year old Vet rider. Never qualified for LL and I’m happy to see the change to the rules for Vet 30+ but also I do not think it’s a good thing for the event nor is it fair to the riders to bar them from competing. Why not do this, some other Vet riders who happen to have been pro years ago and I came up with this idea. Have a Vet 30+ Open class (former pros and A riders are allowed to race this class) and then have Vet 30+ Limited Class for those of us who have never had a pro license. Both will still be competitive yet fair and bring more riders to the Ranch. There are literally 8 C classes now for the kids, there used to only be 3. It really wouldn’t be an issue to drop a couple C classes and add another Vet class or even two in order to bring back Vet 35+. Right now the way it’s set up is very lop sided. Of course there’s people out there saying to Vets who are former pros “just get faster and race pro sport or A class” when we all
Know the majority of us dont want to go out there banging bars with kids half our age that are trying to get a factory ride or pro card, we want to compete amongst each other but still keep it fun. Also, if time constraints are an issue the Vet Class motos could be cut down to 15 minutes instead of 20, I get it that some guys would be upset about that but I think overall it would be better in order to be able to add a couple Vet classes
7
1/6/2022 11:36am
team186 wrote:
Simple solution but 1st. As it is now a 28 yr old A rider has 25+ and Pro Sport. Might not need to be in pro...
Simple solution but 1st. As it is now a 28 yr old A rider has 25+ and Pro Sport. Might not need to be in pro sport anymore I get it. 25+ is his class but only one to ride. A 37 yr old ex A rider used to have 25 and 30. Probably 25+ has passed him by so it all about 30+ for a shot to LL. Now doesn’t have that it’s 25 and pro sport until he hits 40+ = no chance now 30 is only B/C and do we really want 35+ guy (mid-pack A experience) in pro sport? Then in 40 45 50 B/C guys don’t want A guys or ex top pros A guys want sportsman former pros don’t want sportsman 40 and 50 guys don’t want to be forced to ride 25 or pro sport and on and on….

So why not make vet classes age specific just like all youth classes historically have been. No open age no B/C no sportsman. Once you hit 18 or 25 you race in your age class. Riders in 10 year age range will look alike probably ride alike act alike generally weigh alike scrub or not scrub alike. Just like if you showed up to run in a 10K or play in a senior tennis tournament or sign up for a senior golf scramble etc

Make age splits like this

College boy 18-24 (or 17-19)
Vet 1 25-29 (or 20-29)
Vet 2 30-39
Vet3 40-49
Vet4 50+

We’ll then it’ll be I only got one class blah blah. At the local level a vet can then ride the 250 or 450 A B or C class if they need two classes for there weekend fix.

But at LL fix all the problems by making the vet racing the national a one class gig like the pee wee kids. Then with these age splits 85% of vets will probably get in or chances highly increased and we’ll have like aged guys racing like aged guys regardless of A B C status. These 4 vet class splits could be expanded to to A/B and C only but not at LL. 4 vet classes are the standard at LL and would continue to be with these age range splits.

Thx
Steve Hunter
MX retired
Ken-f’ing-tucky USA

Read my comment too. I think you and I are on to something
4
Hi Side
Posts
708
Joined
9/19/2013
Location
USA
1/6/2022 12:10pm Edited Date/Time 1/6/2022 12:59pm
Let me preface this post by saying that I have enormous respect for MX Sports and DC. What DC and his family have done for our sport is immeasurable and all of us should be thankful for his/their commitment to the sport we all love.

With that said, I have gotten to the point where I couldn't care less anymore about the way the vet classes are structured. For a long time it has been somewhat tailored to former pros and the industry "bros". Just take a look at the past champions and it's pretty evident this is true. Working class guys who work five days a week minimum don't really stand a chance under the long standing format. I know some say that it would be awesome to line up against Emig, Brown, Carstens, K. Johnson and the list continues on and on. Would it really? Don't we all compete to do the best we can and finish as far up in the order as possible? Now, for 2022 the classes have changed a lot and it's far more fair for the Monday-Friday guys. The way I understand it is the former pros can only race 25+ and 50+, KUDOS!

Keep in mind this is billed as an "Amateur National". If that is indeed the true spirit of the event then these guys (former pros) have no business being there. How enjoyable is it for the names I mentioned to race a bunch of working class guys? Why don't they attempt to qualify in the Pro Sport class if they're truly there for the competition?

I don't have the answers but for me, my attention and money has shifted to the true amateur vet races that are beginning to gain traction throughout the country. It has been a dream of mine, like most of us here, to line up at the Ranch but under the previous years class structure it just isn't plausible.
3
4
1/6/2022 12:22pm
Hi Side wrote:
Let me preface this post by saying that I have enormous respect for MX Sports and DC. What DC and his family have done for our...
Let me preface this post by saying that I have enormous respect for MX Sports and DC. What DC and his family have done for our sport is immeasurable and all of us should be thankful for his/their commitment to the sport we all love.

With that said, I have gotten to the point where I couldn't care less anymore about the way the vet classes are structured. For a long time it has been somewhat tailored to former pros and the industry "bros". Just take a look at the past champions and it's pretty evident this is true. Working class guys who work five days a week minimum don't really stand a chance under the long standing format. I know some say that it would be awesome to line up against Emig, Brown, Carstens, K. Johnson and the list continues on and on. Would it really? Don't we all compete to do the best we can and finish as far up in the order as possible? Now, for 2022 the classes have changed a lot and it's far more fair for the Monday-Friday guys. The way I understand it is the former pros can only race 25+ and 50+, KUDOS!

Keep in mind this is billed as an "Amateur National". If that is indeed the true spirit of the event then these guys (former pros) have no business being there. How enjoyable is it for the names I mentioned to race a bunch of working class guys? Why don't they attempt to qualify in the Pro Sport class if they're truly there for the competition?

I don't have the answers but for me, my attention and money has shifted to the true amateur vet races that are beginning to gain traction throughout the country. It has been a dream of mine, like most of us here, to line up at the Ranch but under the previous years class structure it just isn't plausible.
I think you and I are pretty much saying the same thing just in a little different way. If we have a Vet 30+ Open then former pros/pro sport and current A riders over 30 can race that class, I’m sure there’s enough of them to fill the gate at LL. The Vet 30+ Limited and Vet 35+ can be for all of us working class 5 day work week guys who never were pro. The funny thing is that these former pros kept saying “well if you wanna race LL stop complaining and just get faster” now that the shoe is on the other foot and they are getting told just get faster and race 25+, A, or Pro sport they aren’t liking it. I don’t blame them though, none of us really wanna duke it out with these kids trying to get a factory ride or pro card lol
1
2
dkurtd
Posts
1141
Joined
4/15/2018
Location
USA
1/6/2022 12:39pm Edited Date/Time 1/6/2022 12:42pm
My guess would be a few of the expro's who haven't turned 50 got into someones ear as they didn't want to ride the 25+ or Pro-sport classes as they too wouldn't be competitive (unless your name is Brown). So they changed the 40+ back to an open class from a sportsman to appease those expro's and made a compromise on the 30+ class hoping they could say "See we made a B/C vet class".

3
2
1/6/2022 12:46pm
dkurtd wrote:
My guess would be a few of the expro's who haven't turned 50 got into someones ear as they didn't want to ride the 25+ or...
My guess would be a few of the expro's who haven't turned 50 got into someones ear as they didn't want to ride the 25+ or Pro-sport classes as they too wouldn't be competitive (unless your name is Brown). So they changed the 40+ back to an open class from a sportsman to appease those expro's and made a compromise on the 30+ class hoping they could say "See we made a B/C vet class".

Yeah I think you’re most likely right there. The irritating thing is that we can find an easier and much better solution to this problem that will over all make most people happy and keep things fair. There is no need to have 8 C classes for these kids now, there’s used to only be 3. Drop it down to 450 C, 250 C stock and modified, 125-150 two stroke C, 125/250 C ages 13-17 or what ever age range you determine is best. Then add Vet 30 Open for former/current Pro/pro sport/A riders and Vet 30 limited for Amateurs and bring back Vet 35+. A lot more guys would be happy
1
yak651
Posts
8993
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI, USA
Fantasy
1/6/2022 1:02pm
dkurtd wrote:
My guess would be a few of the expro's who haven't turned 50 got into someones ear as they didn't want to ride the 25+ or...
My guess would be a few of the expro's who haven't turned 50 got into someones ear as they didn't want to ride the 25+ or Pro-sport classes as they too wouldn't be competitive (unless your name is Brown). So they changed the 40+ back to an open class from a sportsman to appease those expro's and made a compromise on the 30+ class hoping they could say "See we made a B/C vet class".

Yeah I think you’re most likely right there. The irritating thing is that we can find an easier and much better solution to this problem that...
Yeah I think you’re most likely right there. The irritating thing is that we can find an easier and much better solution to this problem that will over all make most people happy and keep things fair. There is no need to have 8 C classes for these kids now, there’s used to only be 3. Drop it down to 450 C, 250 C stock and modified, 125-150 two stroke C, 125/250 C ages 13-17 or what ever age range you determine is best. Then add Vet 30 Open for former/current Pro/pro sport/A riders and Vet 30 limited for Amateurs and bring back Vet 35+. A lot more guys would be happy
Yeah but they probably get more money for all those "kid" C classes at the qualifiers and regionals than they would for "vet" b/c classes
1
2
Robinson340
Posts
36
Joined
11/6/2020
Location
Ashville, OH, USA
1/6/2022 1:18pm
Meister wrote:
Looking for clarification on the new +30 name change for Lorettas. Is it truly a b/c class or still dictated by the ama point rule?
DC wrote:
I've been out all week on lockdown, I will look into what happened here and why, and see if there is a more suitable class structure...
I've been out all week on lockdown, I will look into what happened here and why, and see if there is a more suitable class structure to put forward.

I do not personally make the rules for the supplemental classes at Loretta Lynn's, it's a group of folks including MX Sports officials, AMA officials, regional event promoters and input from the participants. The vet classes are always an issue because there has to be a balance between lifetime fast guys (some of whom were once pros) and amateur vet racers who want to also participate in the national. It's not as easy as just adding a class. The event is already at full capacity and we don't want to add days or shorten motos, or get into the whole qualifying thing at the national.

Hopefully we can find the right balance here, as this has not been as well-received as anyone might have hoped.

DC
Racer X


Kill 45+ and add Vet 30+ A. I doubt many 45-49 year old will cry as much as these 30+ guys.
5
4
1/6/2022 1:35pm Edited Date/Time 1/6/2022 3:15pm
Fuck I thought the mini parents were the problem at amateur nationals , seems the vets are even worse

Can someone answer why the fuck does the USA need a b grade and c grade national champion ? Every other place in the world just puts the fastest 40 people in the line and let’s them race , and qualifies them if needed ,
16
5
1/6/2022 1:55pm
scott_nz wrote:
Fuck I thought the mini parents were the problem at amateur nationals , seems the vets are even worse Can someone answer why the fuck does...
Fuck I thought the mini parents were the problem at amateur nationals , seems the vets are even worse

Can someone answer why the fuck does the USA need a b grade and c grade national champion ? Every other place in the world just puts the fastest 40 people in the line and let’s them race , and qualifies them if needed ,
I mean you’re not wrong. The problem is you have all these former pros wanting to race an event that’s for amateurs. Solution is to just add a Vet 30 Open/Pro class, Vet 30+Intermediate/Amateur and a Vet 35+ and call it good. What’s really ridiculous is having 8 C classes at LL now. There used to only be 3
2
4
Meister
Posts
3324
Joined
3/21/2013
Location
Canton, OH, USA
1/6/2022 2:08pm
Ride it out for a year, then next year, refine sportsman. I benefit from the current change, but in all fairness the designation for sportsman, or I'll go as far as saying all vet classes should be: if you made the fast 40 at a national after 1995, or a supercross night show, you're ineligible.

There's just as many happy about this as there are pissed off guys. The ones happy for it just aren't standing up n yelling.
6
2
Radical
Posts
2927
Joined
10/20/2012
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
1/6/2022 2:52pm
ArmPumped wrote:
There seems to be enough support at American Amateur events that they could run qualifying times to line up classes for anyone over 25? I mean...
There seems to be enough support at American Amateur events that they could run qualifying times to line up classes for anyone over 25? I mean Loretta’s is like a week and a half long right? Couldn’t they run 10 minute qualifying practices at the beginning of the week with transponders and just have a computer assign classes?

Genuinely asking. No contention here. I wish we could get that kind of support and people that cared this much up here near me.
They could but I imagine that would open up the opportunity for people to back it down to be placed in a lower skill group
I don't understand why people do that. Then if you win, the trophy means nothing.
1
1911
Posts
5003
Joined
4/2/2008
Location
LAS VEGAS, NV, USA
1/6/2022 4:20pm
scott_nz wrote:
Fuck I thought the mini parents were the problem at amateur nationals , seems the vets are even worse Can someone answer why the fuck does...
Fuck I thought the mini parents were the problem at amateur nationals , seems the vets are even worse

Can someone answer why the fuck does the USA need a b grade and c grade national champion ? Every other place in the world just puts the fastest 40 people in the line and let’s them race , and qualifies them if needed ,
Because everyone thinks they are special, and all want participation ribbons.
4
1
Meister
Posts
3324
Joined
3/21/2013
Location
Canton, OH, USA
1/6/2022 4:21pm
If they do anything at all, I hope they add a Vet Pro 30 and over. I'm getting tons of texts and calls about people being happy with changing of +30 to b/c. You have a handful of guys being squeaky on Facebook and in email but for as many people I've seen bitching, I've had as many happy texts/calls about it. There's people bitching who make it in 25 on the reg too. I looked up a couple names and there's dudes that have ridden the ranch over 20 times. Taking away the extra 30 and over pro class from them won't stop them from getting to the ranch, where as the guys who belong in B/C, now have a place at the ranch. Don't go thinking a B/C class is gonna be any kind of slow class either..
4
3
Radical
Posts
2927
Joined
10/20/2012
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
1/6/2022 4:31pm
Do we really need classes for every 5 years of age? Can the 35+, and 45+ be repurposed?
I don't see 35+, 45+, 55+ at any local races, and that's never bothered me. Why does LL need those classes?

Why not:
30+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)
40+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)
50+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)

125 2T A, B, C (or A, B/C)
250 2T A, B, C (or A, B/C)

Ex-pros simply race the A classes.

Also, only some ex-pros are going to retain top level speed as they age, and some amateurs like myself are going to get faster as we age. Steve Mathes stated recently that when he races, he's now more at the intermediate speed for his age class. I believe that for an ex-pro to run an intermediate class, they'd have to register early, then prove they're no longer at the A class level by referencing race results from the previous 2 years.

I'm 59 now. I'll be 60 before the next LL.
Under this system I'd attempt to qualify for 50+ C (or B/C) and 125 C (or B/C).

If I can gain enough speed in the coming years, I'll go for the ProAm class and then do my freaking best to earn my pro-card!

I'd love to race Emig, Brown, etc... on 125s, but if I do, I'll be going for the win!
I'm not quite there yet. Ok, I'm not even close to there yet, but I'm working on it Smile .

Granted, I don't know a ton about LL, but if we want to make it fair and fun, this is one way to do it.
3
2
1/6/2022 4:40pm
I mean you’re not wrong. The problem is you have all these former pros wanting to race an event that’s for amateurs. Solution is to just...
I mean you’re not wrong. The problem is you have all these former pros wanting to race an event that’s for amateurs. Solution is to just add a Vet 30 Open/Pro class, Vet 30+Intermediate/Amateur and a Vet 35+ and call it good. What’s really ridiculous is having 8 C classes at LL now. There used to only be 3
How many c classes did there used to be?
1
1
wiggins419
Posts
84
Joined
2/14/2016
Location
Motor City, MI, USA
1/6/2022 5:07pm
This rule change benefits me 100% but I’ll gladly admit it’s ridiculous. What a kick in the nuts to the 30+ A rider who has never even tried to qualify for a national.
4
crusher773
Posts
2025
Joined
12/23/2009
Location
Coweta, OK, USA
1/6/2022 5:24pm
Radical wrote:
Do we really need classes for every 5 years of age? Can the 35+, and 45+ be repurposed? I don't see 35+, 45+, 55+ at any...
Do we really need classes for every 5 years of age? Can the 35+, and 45+ be repurposed?
I don't see 35+, 45+, 55+ at any local races, and that's never bothered me. Why does LL need those classes?

Why not:
30+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)
40+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)
50+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)

125 2T A, B, C (or A, B/C)
250 2T A, B, C (or A, B/C)

Ex-pros simply race the A classes.

Also, only some ex-pros are going to retain top level speed as they age, and some amateurs like myself are going to get faster as we age. Steve Mathes stated recently that when he races, he's now more at the intermediate speed for his age class. I believe that for an ex-pro to run an intermediate class, they'd have to register early, then prove they're no longer at the A class level by referencing race results from the previous 2 years.

I'm 59 now. I'll be 60 before the next LL.
Under this system I'd attempt to qualify for 50+ C (or B/C) and 125 C (or B/C).

If I can gain enough speed in the coming years, I'll go for the ProAm class and then do my freaking best to earn my pro-card!

I'd love to race Emig, Brown, etc... on 125s, but if I do, I'll be going for the win!
I'm not quite there yet. Ok, I'm not even close to there yet, but I'm working on it Smile .

Granted, I don't know a ton about LL, but if we want to make it fair and fun, this is one way to do it.
Yep this would be a perfectly fine structure. It could also be run on an advancement system. Like top 5 at the ranch and you move up to A or 2 years in a row top 10 and move up. Just like with the younger classes. I'm with the guy that asked is it really fun to race pros if you aren't one? Hell no! I have no problem being on the track with them and try to hang and have fun on a practice day but it's no fun to have to try and race someone that was at a pro level.
3
2
Meister
Posts
3324
Joined
3/21/2013
Location
Canton, OH, USA
1/6/2022 6:05pm
Radical wrote:
Do we really need classes for every 5 years of age? Can the 35+, and 45+ be repurposed? I don't see 35+, 45+, 55+ at any...
Do we really need classes for every 5 years of age? Can the 35+, and 45+ be repurposed?
I don't see 35+, 45+, 55+ at any local races, and that's never bothered me. Why does LL need those classes?

Why not:
30+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)
40+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)
50+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)

125 2T A, B, C (or A, B/C)
250 2T A, B, C (or A, B/C)

Ex-pros simply race the A classes.

Also, only some ex-pros are going to retain top level speed as they age, and some amateurs like myself are going to get faster as we age. Steve Mathes stated recently that when he races, he's now more at the intermediate speed for his age class. I believe that for an ex-pro to run an intermediate class, they'd have to register early, then prove they're no longer at the A class level by referencing race results from the previous 2 years.

I'm 59 now. I'll be 60 before the next LL.
Under this system I'd attempt to qualify for 50+ C (or B/C) and 125 C (or B/C).

If I can gain enough speed in the coming years, I'll go for the ProAm class and then do my freaking best to earn my pro-card!

I'd love to race Emig, Brown, etc... on 125s, but if I do, I'll be going for the win!
I'm not quite there yet. Ok, I'm not even close to there yet, but I'm working on it Smile .

Granted, I don't know a ton about LL, but if we want to make it fair and fun, this is one way to do it.
They do a,b,c at vet only races. Time will never allow that at Lorettas.
1
1/6/2022 6:09pm
I mean you’re not wrong. The problem is you have all these former pros wanting to race an event that’s for amateurs. Solution is to just...
I mean you’re not wrong. The problem is you have all these former pros wanting to race an event that’s for amateurs. Solution is to just add a Vet 30 Open/Pro class, Vet 30+Intermediate/Amateur and a Vet 35+ and call it good. What’s really ridiculous is having 8 C classes at LL now. There used to only be 3
shiftmx_22 wrote:
How many c classes did there used to be?
In the mid 2000s it used to be 250 C, 125 C Stock and 125 C modified. Of course they change the classes to 450 and 250 but same same
1/6/2022 6:11pm
wiggins419 wrote:
This rule change benefits me 100% but I’ll gladly admit it’s ridiculous. What a kick in the nuts to the 30+ A rider who has never...
This rule change benefits me 100% but I’ll gladly admit it’s ridiculous. What a kick in the nuts to the 30+ A rider who has never even tried to qualify for a national.
I thought it was just regular A class and former and current pro license holders that couldn’t race Vet 30 anymore. Pretty sure you can if your Vet 30 A. If not then I might be SOL
Radical
Posts
2927
Joined
10/20/2012
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
1/6/2022 6:15pm
Radical wrote:
Do we really need classes for every 5 years of age? Can the 35+, and 45+ be repurposed? I don't see 35+, 45+, 55+ at any...
Do we really need classes for every 5 years of age? Can the 35+, and 45+ be repurposed?
I don't see 35+, 45+, 55+ at any local races, and that's never bothered me. Why does LL need those classes?

Why not:
30+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)
40+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)
50+ A, B, C (or A, B/C)

125 2T A, B, C (or A, B/C)
250 2T A, B, C (or A, B/C)

Ex-pros simply race the A classes.

Also, only some ex-pros are going to retain top level speed as they age, and some amateurs like myself are going to get faster as we age. Steve Mathes stated recently that when he races, he's now more at the intermediate speed for his age class. I believe that for an ex-pro to run an intermediate class, they'd have to register early, then prove they're no longer at the A class level by referencing race results from the previous 2 years.

I'm 59 now. I'll be 60 before the next LL.
Under this system I'd attempt to qualify for 50+ C (or B/C) and 125 C (or B/C).

If I can gain enough speed in the coming years, I'll go for the ProAm class and then do my freaking best to earn my pro-card!

I'd love to race Emig, Brown, etc... on 125s, but if I do, I'll be going for the win!
I'm not quite there yet. Ok, I'm not even close to there yet, but I'm working on it Smile .

Granted, I don't know a ton about LL, but if we want to make it fair and fun, this is one way to do it.
Meister wrote:
They do a,b,c at vet only races. Time will never allow that at Lorettas.
Well, we don't need A, B, C. That's why I listed an option to have A, plus combined B/C per 30+, 40+, 50+.
2 of the 3 additional classes can take the timeslots of the 35+ and 45+ classes.
I'm seeing more value in breaking up 30, 40, and 50, than in having the 35 and 45 classes.
1
1

Post a reply to: Paging DC

The Latest