Is it time to change the rules?

ga_pike
Posts
2650
Joined
7/14/2011
Location
Valdosta, GA, USA
Edited Date/Time 10/11/2019 5:49am
With the current landscape of Pro Motocross and Supercross, is it time to figure out how to bring more manufacturers to both the SX ad MX series? We've all read about the potential of Suzuki dropping out. There are several guys struggling for rides that many people think "deserve" one. Could there be a production rule that allows for smaller, boutique manufacturers to compete? Would TM, Sherco, Gas Gas, or others be interested in fielding a team if the rules allowed without the minimum import/sales requirement?

If they found a way to make an exception, why shouldn't someone like JS17 or CR22 be allowed to race a factory TM in the states next year?

Thoughts?
14
3
|
kb228
Posts
6153
Joined
1/31/2018
Location
Mansfield, OH, USA
10/1/2019 7:35am
That homologation rule should be scrapped.

That being said i dont think beta is going to come in and produce a factory bike and team like the big 6 has and then also afford two factory level riders or find a sponsor
11
captmoto
Posts
5925
Joined
4/22/2009
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
10/1/2019 7:43am
There are plenty of privateer that would ride for expenses. I think the big costs are in the R&D it takes to get the bikes to AMA Pro level. It would be nice to see though. KTM owns 60% of Gas Gas now so who knows?
1
early
Posts
10110
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
10/1/2019 7:45am
Things don't look better in the GPs as far as good rides go without the production rule, I would say they look worse.
3
KDXGarage
Posts
2561
Joined
12/16/2010
Location
USA
10/1/2019 7:50am
Big 6?? Sit down. You aren't going to want to hear this, but I think it is time. ... Husqvarna is a white KTM. I know. I know. Be strong.

I don't think TM, etc. want to get their asses handed to them even if they had the money.
3
1

The Shop

DonM
Posts
9066
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
Fantasy
10/1/2019 7:53am
Rules won't change a thing...We need more asses in stands, more eyeballs watching and more people buying bikes...
13
ga_pike
Posts
2650
Joined
7/14/2011
Location
Valdosta, GA, USA
10/1/2019 7:55am Edited Date/Time 10/1/2019 7:56am
captmoto wrote:
There are plenty of privateer that would ride for expenses. I think the big costs are in the R&D it takes to get the bikes to...
There are plenty of privateer that would ride for expenses. I think the big costs are in the R&D it takes to get the bikes to AMA Pro level. It would be nice to see though. KTM owns 60% of Gas Gas now so who knows?
Do you not think there are deserving riders that would take a ride with TM or Beta and help develop the bike as opposed to going it alone in a privateer effort? Is the TM that far behind Honda and Kawasaki from a retail bike standpoint?

Sorry - Quoted the wrong post and not sure how to fix.
2
Red Crawford
Posts
312
Joined
12/28/2018
Location
Huntington Beach, CA, USA
10/1/2019 7:56am Edited Date/Time 10/1/2019 7:56am
I remember the Support Class, where privateer types and those on the verge could race competitively and make a little dough until slotting in big boy level.

Of course, that's when you ran the number you earned and riders traveled with their mechanics in box vans.

Yeah I'm old and like to travel back in my time machine.... Whistling
7
SoCalMX70
Posts
3603
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
10/1/2019 7:56am
I don't know, but I've believed for awhile now that the 250 class needs more restrictions on mods (mainly on the engines) and the 450 class can simply be open/no limits/run whatcha brung.

There's just something about the 250 class top teams having 50hp engines that last one race that seems ridiculous to me... And highly restrictive to anyone else trying to get to that level.
26
Stuntman949
Posts
2857
Joined
11/10/2015
Location
San Clemente, CA, USA
10/1/2019 8:12am
I would like to believe that the homologation rule has benefited us consumers with a better product on the retail side. I would also love nothing more than seeing Betas and TM's line up on the top level. Very conflicting.
7
BobPA
Posts
8342
Joined
10/31/2013
Location
USA
10/1/2019 8:16am
KDXGarage wrote:
Big 6?? Sit down. You aren't going to want to hear this, but I think it is time. ... Husqvarna is a white KTM. I know...
Big 6?? Sit down. You aren't going to want to hear this, but I think it is time. ... Husqvarna is a white KTM. I know. I know. Be strong.

I don't think TM, etc. want to get their asses handed to them even if they had the money.
Everyone knows they are just a white KTM, but they still fund an entire team. In fact, they have 3 450 riders this year....along with a 250 squad. So how is it not the “big 6”??
9
10/1/2019 8:38am Edited Date/Time 10/1/2019 8:39am
SoCalMX70 wrote:
I don't know, but I've believed for awhile now that the 250 class needs more restrictions on mods (mainly on the engines) and the 450 class...
I don't know, but I've believed for awhile now that the 250 class needs more restrictions on mods (mainly on the engines) and the 450 class can simply be open/no limits/run whatcha brung.

There's just something about the 250 class top teams having 50hp engines that last one race that seems ridiculous to me... And highly restrictive to anyone else trying to get to that level.
That would be an excellent and affordable start, but would be tough on the aftermarket companies. And to add, I might be in the minority here but the 250cc Internal combustion engine produces enough power that it should be the premier class.
1
2
kxking
Posts
1990
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Fantasy
10/1/2019 5:55pm
SoCalMX70 wrote:
I don't know, but I've believed for awhile now that the 250 class needs more restrictions on mods (mainly on the engines) and the 450 class...
I don't know, but I've believed for awhile now that the 250 class needs more restrictions on mods (mainly on the engines) and the 450 class can simply be open/no limits/run whatcha brung.

There's just something about the 250 class top teams having 50hp engines that last one race that seems ridiculous to me... And highly restrictive to anyone else trying to get to that level.
peltier626 wrote:
That would be an excellent and affordable start, but would be tough on the aftermarket companies. And to add, I might be in the minority here...
That would be an excellent and affordable start, but would be tough on the aftermarket companies. And to add, I might be in the minority here but the 250cc Internal combustion engine produces enough power that it should be the premier class.
How would it be tough on the aftermarket companies?
dickjackson170
Posts
718
Joined
11/7/2017
Location
Navarre, OH, USA
10/1/2019 6:22pm
From the talk on podcasts, it's time for the promoters (FELD) to stop running a carnival that restricts sponsor dollars and percieved conflicts of interest, due to exclusive contracts THEY SIGN with sponsors.
15
10/1/2019 7:11pm Edited Date/Time 10/1/2019 7:13pm
SoCalMX70 wrote:
I don't know, but I've believed for awhile now that the 250 class needs more restrictions on mods (mainly on the engines) and the 450 class...
I don't know, but I've believed for awhile now that the 250 class needs more restrictions on mods (mainly on the engines) and the 450 class can simply be open/no limits/run whatcha brung.

There's just something about the 250 class top teams having 50hp engines that last one race that seems ridiculous to me... And highly restrictive to anyone else trying to get to that level.
peltier626 wrote:
That would be an excellent and affordable start, but would be tough on the aftermarket companies. And to add, I might be in the minority here...
That would be an excellent and affordable start, but would be tough on the aftermarket companies. And to add, I might be in the minority here but the 250cc Internal combustion engine produces enough power that it should be the premier class.
kxking wrote:
How would it be tough on the aftermarket companies?
In relation to a stock class. I'm all for it but it would initially negate companies who specialize in performance products. I do think that we have reached the threshold in power/speed ratio and costs, but long term i think stock classes would be viable to the future on this niche sport.
1
Johnny Depp
Posts
6433
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
10/1/2019 7:39pm Edited Date/Time 10/3/2019 8:41am
TM just a few years ago had several bikes with top finishes at the MXON. Sherco is winning againt the might of Team Austria in Hard Enduro. Beta is racking up EnduroGP, Endurocross and Scramble, Sprint Enduro and GNCC Titles the last few years. All of this against top level competition on Dirt Bikes. Beta has 4 new 4 stroke engine updates in the last 10 years, how many has Suzuki had?

For those that think there is some big development needed to get these bikes to the Pro level you are likely in for a surprise. Finding qualified riders is another thing.

It would be a breath of fresh air that MX/SX sorely needs, and they should revamp the CC rules and lift the 2 stroke "ban".
The Classes should both be "Open" (including electric) and separated only by age or not at all. A 125 class for 15 and under would be the cherry on Top.

Now somebody wake me up!
4
1
Tarz483
Posts
6344
Joined
2/25/2009
Location
Mankato, MN, USA
10/1/2019 8:10pm
There are a lot Of rules that need to be changed
2
Tarz483
Posts
6344
Joined
2/25/2009
Location
Mankato, MN, USA
10/1/2019 8:11pm
SoCalMX70 wrote:
I don't know, but I've believed for awhile now that the 250 class needs more restrictions on mods (mainly on the engines) and the 450 class...
I don't know, but I've believed for awhile now that the 250 class needs more restrictions on mods (mainly on the engines) and the 450 class can simply be open/no limits/run whatcha brung.

There's just something about the 250 class top teams having 50hp engines that last one race that seems ridiculous to me... And highly restrictive to anyone else trying to get to that level.
peltier626 wrote:
That would be an excellent and affordable start, but would be tough on the aftermarket companies. And to add, I might be in the minority here...
That would be an excellent and affordable start, but would be tough on the aftermarket companies. And to add, I might be in the minority here but the 250cc Internal combustion engine produces enough power that it should be the premier class.
kxking wrote:
How would it be tough on the aftermarket companies?
Right if The have Stock and Mod class , problem solved.
ccullins
Posts
295
Joined
11/24/2016
Location
Riverside, CA, USA
10/1/2019 9:40pm
I’m very familiar with the “exotic” brands and how their teams are run.
Beta and Sherco have zero interest in MX. That goes for both the US and Europe. They are off-road bikes only and they are extremely successful at it.

TM on the other hand does make MX bikes and is in it. However TM is way too small to field a MX team if the production rule was lifted. They don’t have the funds to pay a rider, pay a mechanic, buy a truck or any of that. What they might be able to do is supply a couple bikes and parts to a guy who is capable of making the night show at best. Sure it would be cool to see a TM out there, but that doesn’t at all help the main focus of this thread of getting deserving riders factory rides.
4
cwtoyota
Posts
2424
Joined
3/11/2013
Location
Tacoma, WA, USA
10/1/2019 10:11pm
kb228 wrote:
That homologation rule should be scrapped. That being said i dont think beta is going to come in and produce a factory bike and team like...
That homologation rule should be scrapped.

That being said i dont think beta is going to come in and produce a factory bike and team like the big 6 has and then also afford two factory level riders or find a sponsor
All they need to do is add a low volume manufacturer exemption.

Another option is to change the number from 400 motorcycles (or whatever it is) to a percentage of their motocross models in that dispacement class available to the public.

Let's say for example the race team must use cases, frames, swing-arms, etc that are common to 25% of the available 124cc to 250cc motocross models the company has available in dealers for sale through the season.

Something like that can both eliminate the abuse of the rule (Factory Editions) and eliminate the exclusion of manufacturers like TM, GasGas, etc.
Johnny Depp
Posts
6433
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
10/2/2019 7:59am Edited Date/Time 10/2/2019 8:00am
kb228 wrote:
That homologation rule should be scrapped. That being said i dont think beta is going to come in and produce a factory bike and team like...
That homologation rule should be scrapped.

That being said i dont think beta is going to come in and produce a factory bike and team like the big 6 has and then also afford two factory level riders or find a sponsor
cwtoyota wrote:
All they need to do is add a low volume manufacturer exemption. Another option is to change the number from 400 motorcycles (or whatever it is)...
All they need to do is add a low volume manufacturer exemption.

Another option is to change the number from 400 motorcycles (or whatever it is) to a percentage of their motocross models in that dispacement class available to the public.

Let's say for example the race team must use cases, frames, swing-arms, etc that are common to 25% of the available 124cc to 250cc motocross models the company has available in dealers for sale through the season.

Something like that can both eliminate the abuse of the rule (Factory Editions) and eliminate the exclusion of manufacturers like TM, GasGas, etc.
Way too complex.
Open classes would eliminate all that shit. Bring on the factory editions, they have them in GP's and it doesn't mean shit. Electric bikes need to be let in, and not with a bunch of stupid rules that no one understands. 2 strokes need to be let in. Building 1 race wonder 250's is just stupid for the "up and comer" class where the riders are just as fast as the "premier" class. Who cares if someone builds a one off "bespoke" bike and joins the show? This sport doesn't have a lot of room to be kicking people out.

1
1
Johnny Depp
Posts
6433
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
10/2/2019 8:02am
ccullins wrote:
I’m very familiar with the “exotic” brands and how their teams are run. Beta and Sherco have zero interest in MX. That goes for both the...
I’m very familiar with the “exotic” brands and how their teams are run.
Beta and Sherco have zero interest in MX. That goes for both the US and Europe. They are off-road bikes only and they are extremely successful at it.

TM on the other hand does make MX bikes and is in it. However TM is way too small to field a MX team if the production rule was lifted. They don’t have the funds to pay a rider, pay a mechanic, buy a truck or any of that. What they might be able to do is supply a couple bikes and parts to a guy who is capable of making the night show at best. Sure it would be cool to see a TM out there, but that doesn’t at all help the main focus of this thread of getting deserving riders factory rides.
Of course they have no interest, they know the rules will never let them in. That is what this thread is about.
1
RCF
Posts
548
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
10/2/2019 9:24am
peltier626 wrote:
In relation to a stock class. I'm all for it but it would initially negate companies who specialize in performance products. I do think that we...
In relation to a stock class. I'm all for it but it would initially negate companies who specialize in performance products. I do think that we have reached the threshold in power/speed ratio and costs, but long term i think stock classes would be viable to the future on this niche sport.
I don't think it would hurt after market,weekend warrior still want their bikes to look cool.
1
BobPA
Posts
8342
Joined
10/31/2013
Location
USA
10/2/2019 9:35am
peltier626 wrote:
That would be an excellent and affordable start, but would be tough on the aftermarket companies. And to add, I might be in the minority here...
That would be an excellent and affordable start, but would be tough on the aftermarket companies. And to add, I might be in the minority here but the 250cc Internal combustion engine produces enough power that it should be the premier class.
kxking wrote:
How would it be tough on the aftermarket companies?
Tarz483 wrote:
Right if The have Stock and Mod class , problem solved.
Stock classes can also be extremely expensive. Big teams will still spend big $ for the slightest of advantages. Saw it happen with jet ski racing. The "stock" class ended up costing as much as a limited setup.

People always find a way to "massage" the rules, especially when the amount of mods are limited. Guys with big budgets always find a way to bend the rules, just a fact of racing.
2
Tarz483
Posts
6344
Joined
2/25/2009
Location
Mankato, MN, USA
10/2/2019 11:50am
kb228 wrote:
That homologation rule should be scrapped. That being said i dont think beta is going to come in and produce a factory bike and team like...
That homologation rule should be scrapped.

That being said i dont think beta is going to come in and produce a factory bike and team like the big 6 has and then also afford two factory level riders or find a sponsor
cwtoyota wrote:
All they need to do is add a low volume manufacturer exemption. Another option is to change the number from 400 motorcycles (or whatever it is)...
All they need to do is add a low volume manufacturer exemption.

Another option is to change the number from 400 motorcycles (or whatever it is) to a percentage of their motocross models in that dispacement class available to the public.

Let's say for example the race team must use cases, frames, swing-arms, etc that are common to 25% of the available 124cc to 250cc motocross models the company has available in dealers for sale through the season.

Something like that can both eliminate the abuse of the rule (Factory Editions) and eliminate the exclusion of manufacturers like TM, GasGas, etc.
Way too complex. Open classes would eliminate all that shit. Bring on the factory editions, they have them in GP's and it doesn't mean shit. Electric...
Way too complex.
Open classes would eliminate all that shit. Bring on the factory editions, they have them in GP's and it doesn't mean shit. Electric bikes need to be let in, and not with a bunch of stupid rules that no one understands. 2 strokes need to be let in. Building 1 race wonder 250's is just stupid for the "up and comer" class where the riders are just as fast as the "premier" class. Who cares if someone builds a one off "bespoke" bike and joins the show? This sport doesn't have a lot of room to be kicking people out.

I have Nothing against electric bikes , I'm all for them , I think they likely are the future, who knows when, but
In my opinion I really really think and hope that they keep them separate, welcome them with open arms , but give them there own class , if it comes to the point they are equal or better they will then eventually be the top class or whatever , they will find there place , but I completely disagree with Mixing them.
I think when 250f's came they should have given them there own class too and even more so at a local level.
4
WFO
Posts
601
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Terrell, TX, USA
10/2/2019 11:53am
The almighty 250 class was to be the stepping stone to the big boy class.
The 250 class should be almost stock. The sport will keep dying until they do this.
SX and MX has so much politics is Laughable.
Its all about money and Power. Start a riders union and watch what those in power do.
4
Johnny Depp
Posts
6433
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
10/2/2019 1:27pm Edited Date/Time 10/2/2019 1:29pm
cwtoyota wrote:
All they need to do is add a low volume manufacturer exemption. Another option is to change the number from 400 motorcycles (or whatever it is)...
All they need to do is add a low volume manufacturer exemption.

Another option is to change the number from 400 motorcycles (or whatever it is) to a percentage of their motocross models in that dispacement class available to the public.

Let's say for example the race team must use cases, frames, swing-arms, etc that are common to 25% of the available 124cc to 250cc motocross models the company has available in dealers for sale through the season.

Something like that can both eliminate the abuse of the rule (Factory Editions) and eliminate the exclusion of manufacturers like TM, GasGas, etc.
Way too complex. Open classes would eliminate all that shit. Bring on the factory editions, they have them in GP's and it doesn't mean shit. Electric...
Way too complex.
Open classes would eliminate all that shit. Bring on the factory editions, they have them in GP's and it doesn't mean shit. Electric bikes need to be let in, and not with a bunch of stupid rules that no one understands. 2 strokes need to be let in. Building 1 race wonder 250's is just stupid for the "up and comer" class where the riders are just as fast as the "premier" class. Who cares if someone builds a one off "bespoke" bike and joins the show? This sport doesn't have a lot of room to be kicking people out.

Tarz483 wrote:
I have Nothing against electric bikes , I'm all for them , I think they likely are the future, who knows when, but In my opinion...
I have Nothing against electric bikes , I'm all for them , I think they likely are the future, who knows when, but
In my opinion I really really think and hope that they keep them separate, welcome them with open arms , but give them there own class , if it comes to the point they are equal or better they will then eventually be the top class or whatever , they will find there place , but I completely disagree with Mixing them.
I think when 250f's came they should have given them there own class too and even more so at a local level.
Too many classes is killing this sport.

Who is the fastest around the track is all I need to know, ride whatever you want and strap on your big boy panties.

Changes in this sport come slower than Global Warming. If we get the chance let's get it done, once.
3
10/2/2019 1:35pm
More brands won't help much, and might make things worse.

Further fragmentation will just yield lower total sales for each, but the R&D costs remain the same, which would likely increase the cost of bikes even more, limiting top-line growth for all brands....it becomes a vicious cycle.

Without solutions that increase total participation in the sport (i.e. bike sales), it will just keep getting harder for smaller manufacturers like Suzuki.
Johnny Depp
Posts
6433
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
10/2/2019 4:02pm
TriRacer27 wrote:
More brands won't help much, and might make things worse. Further fragmentation will just yield lower total sales for each, but the R&D costs remain the...
More brands won't help much, and might make things worse.

Further fragmentation will just yield lower total sales for each, but the R&D costs remain the same, which would likely increase the cost of bikes even more, limiting top-line growth for all brands....it becomes a vicious cycle.

Without solutions that increase total participation in the sport (i.e. bike sales), it will just keep getting harder for smaller manufacturers like Suzuki.
Right, let's not do anything then.

You do realize that the boutique companies are ALREADY selling and developing bikes?
2
Rooster
Posts
4432
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edmonton, CA
10/2/2019 4:19pm
Restrict them to 1 engine per season (west coast/ east coast) with a points penalty if they need to swap one out.

That way the aftermarket companies still get to sell mods (and run teams) and it helps show they can build performance engines that can last more than an hour.

Everything inside the engine is sealed and can't be replaced or rebuilt. You can change maps, pipes, plugs and clutches, but not pistons, valves, cams, rods, cranks, transmissions, etc.

Sure the top teams will still find a way to eke out an advantage where they can, but it won't be as big. With the limited amount of bikes that are homologated for the series, coming up with tamper evident fasteners shouldn't be too difficult. They can be added and checked easily during tech before each event. Get caught cheating and the points penalty triples.
4
8
Johnny Depp
Posts
6433
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
10/2/2019 4:32pm
Rooster wrote:
Restrict them to 1 engine per season (west coast/ east coast) with a points penalty if they need to swap one out. That way the aftermarket...
Restrict them to 1 engine per season (west coast/ east coast) with a points penalty if they need to swap one out.

That way the aftermarket companies still get to sell mods (and run teams) and it helps show they can build performance engines that can last more than an hour.

Everything inside the engine is sealed and can't be replaced or rebuilt. You can change maps, pipes, plugs and clutches, but not pistons, valves, cams, rods, cranks, transmissions, etc.

Sure the top teams will still find a way to eke out an advantage where they can, but it won't be as big. With the limited amount of bikes that are homologated for the series, coming up with tamper evident fasteners shouldn't be too difficult. They can be added and checked easily during tech before each event. Get caught cheating and the points penalty triples.
There is no need to make it complicated with the "Pit Police".

Open Class solves all the problems. No one is forced to run a bottle rocket with a short fuse.
1

Post a reply to: Is it time to change the rules?

The Latest