Posts
5281
Joined
2/2/2008
Location
Sydney, AU
Edited Date/Time
1/24/2012 1:41pm
These backyard BMX tracks that suit Stewarts style to the ground suk. Its painfully obvious, so obvious even the blind freddy's of Vital can see how boring the tracks are. When the only challenge for Bubba is raw speed, he dominates, when it gets technically challenging he wads up.
We get your point about the need for an American Hero dominating, but this is seriously rediculous now, everyone can see it.
zzzzzsnnoooozercross
We get your point about the need for an American Hero dominating, but this is seriously rediculous now, everyone can see it.
zzzzzsnnoooozercross
P
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
I cant believe you are blaming the tracks now..... whats next?
If that was the case , all of us that post on here would be out there racing every weekend.
you are off on this one, The Promoter is in charge of the track not the AMA , the AMA can make them change it if it's dangerous for the riders but not the layout of the track.
Unfortunately for Reed if the tracks get tougher Stewart's gap will be bigger and then the gap from Reed back more.
Maybe last year they did the same thing to give Reed an advantage over Windham.
I've heard some good ones but this is priceless.
Pit Row
People who talk about SX tracks being easy to ride never rode one. Now, SX isn't the same as MX in terms of conditioning and toughness, but it ain't easy to do.
Could you please tell me what "issues" Reed is having.
Maybe their both on their "A" game, and Stewart is faster.
A1 has been the only track built with passing in mind.
regardless of the outcome of the race, whether stewart wins or not, the tracks are not built for passing. they look like they are being built to keep everyone together. that translates to no passing spots, which translates to get a holeshot or dick around behind mike alessi for 4 laps.
houston and san francisco have been rediculous layouts with the same shitty obstacles just mismatched. both tracks have been built so the only fast way is to rail the corner and take the same rythem through every section. gay.
and for whoever said Bailey designed San-Fran, Anaheim 3 is going to be the first track to offer a custom design, and it's MC's. Bailey just did the track walk on RacerX.
Who exactly at the AMA is making the decision to build Stewart friendly SX tracks? When they come up with the track layout that works to Stewarts advantage, who are they then passing this mandate on to to ensure it's built to Stewarts liking?
Oh, and what's the AMA's motivation to build tracks to Stewart's liking? Seems odd that anyone would want to give Stewart an advantage with the track design and turn the races into bigger snooze fests...wouldn't that eventually effect attendance?
Have any other conspiracy theories you've been working on?
Post a reply to: Can the AMA sak up and ditch the easy shit tracks???