Hangtown 150' Jump

The Rock
Posts
8758
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI US
5/25/2016 6:21am
Everyone is missing the point. It's not dangerous because you are more likely to get hurt compared to a regular section, it's more dangerous because if...
Everyone is missing the point. It's not dangerous because you are more likely to get hurt compared to a regular section, it's more dangerous because if one little thing goes wrong you can be paralyzed or dead. A choppy section usually won't lead to serious injuries (usually) but 150 ft jumps can.
At least somebody gets it. Thank you for taking the time to contribute.
Mr. Info
Posts
1671
Joined
5/3/2010
Location
Perris, CA US
5/25/2016 6:21am
The Glen Helen triple step up is going to be a great place to watch the riders. Even if they choose to double its quite a sight. And very easy to do either. It's a natural arc to reach the top of the double or triple which ever they choose.
huck
Posts
17025
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Mountain Home, AR US
5/25/2016 6:31am
Everyone is missing the point. It's not dangerous because you are more likely to get hurt compared to a regular section, it's more dangerous because if...
Everyone is missing the point. It's not dangerous because you are more likely to get hurt compared to a regular section, it's more dangerous because if one little thing goes wrong you can be paralyzed or dead. A choppy section usually won't lead to serious injuries (usually) but 150 ft jumps can.
The Rock wrote:
At least somebody gets it. Thank you for taking the time to contribute.
Aren't you the one that was just 'bragging' about the jumps at REM?
The Rock
Posts
8758
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI US
5/25/2016 6:51am Edited Date/Time 5/25/2016 6:55am
huck wrote:
Aren't you the one that was just 'bragging' about the jumps at REM?
Yes that was me. I was bragging that REM has five 150 footers, three 120 footers but the best is yet to come:

Next REM there will be a 180 footer quintuple!

Seriously are you really that dense or just in a rush to be critical to imply REM jumps are the same as the 150 footer? Where's a face palm photo when you need one.

For the reading challenged Vitards please let me clarify:

1) MX definitely includes jumps
2) I don't want flat tracks devoid of any jumps
3) I don't want 100 foot jumps on my local track
4) I don't want to ride on a smooth outdoor SX track with a lot of jumps
5) I do want to ride and race on a rough gnarly outdoor MX track WITH reasonable jumps. This is why I am a REM fan.

BTW I would love to know how many of you big air tough guys even ride?

Same question about lifting. :-)

PS no answer from the guys saying REM is easy regarding if they've raced there. Classic blowhards

The Shop

seth505
Posts
10170
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SD, CA US
5/25/2016 6:58am
shanes wrote:
after reading some of these comments , it is scary to see how pussyfied the world has become . if your so worried about getting hurt...
after reading some of these comments , it is scary to see how pussyfied the world has become . if your so worried about getting hurt go and do something else , no one makes anyone jump it , you went them to build a tack any knobber can ride ? i would not hit that i wish i could but doesn't mean i want it removed from the track .

this is MX time grow a set
I just showed up to agree with this 100%
huck
Posts
17025
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Mountain Home, AR US
5/25/2016 6:58am Edited Date/Time 5/25/2016 7:03am
huck wrote:
Aren't you the one that was just 'bragging' about the jumps at REM?
The Rock wrote:
Yes that was me. I was bragging that REM has five 150 footers, three 120 footers but the best is yet to come: Next REM there...
Yes that was me. I was bragging that REM has five 150 footers, three 120 footers but the best is yet to come:

Next REM there will be a 180 footer quintuple!

Seriously are you really that dense or just in a rush to be critical to imply REM jumps are the same as the 150 footer? Where's a face palm photo when you need one.

For the reading challenged Vitards please let me clarify:

1) MX definitely includes jumps
2) I don't want flat tracks devoid of any jumps
3) I don't want 100 foot jumps on my local track
4) I don't want to ride on a smooth outdoor SX track with a lot of jumps
5) I do want to ride and race on a rough gnarly outdoor MX track WITH reasonable jumps. This is why I am a REM fan.

BTW I would love to know how many of you big air tough guys even ride?

Same question about lifting. :-)

PS no answer from the guys saying REM is easy regarding if they've raced there. Classic blowhards
You have lots of "EYES" in your post.
What YOU consider big or dangerous, maybe somebody else considers fun. What you consider fun, maybe somebody else considers dangerous and big.

If you don't want to jump 150 footers, the simple solution is to not jump them.

I've ridden at REM and Glen Helen. I didn't jump the big step up jump at GH...but I also didn't start a campaign to have it shortened either....

seth505
Posts
10170
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SD, CA US
5/25/2016 7:00am
Everyone is missing the point. It's not dangerous because you are more likely to get hurt compared to a regular section, it's more dangerous because if...
Everyone is missing the point. It's not dangerous because you are more likely to get hurt compared to a regular section, it's more dangerous because if one little thing goes wrong you can be paralyzed or dead. A choppy section usually won't lead to serious injuries (usually) but 150 ft jumps can.
The Rock wrote:
At least somebody gets it. Thank you for taking the time to contribute.
Really? Where are the numbers that prove this kind of claim? I can think of a few people off the top of my head who have broken their neck on rough sections of different tracks and I don't know any who have done that on a jump.
Lefty Right
Posts
733
Joined
5/20/2009
Location
Carmichael, CA US
5/25/2016 7:05am
Lucky it's really only 130'
slipdog
Posts
10055
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Nor Cal, CA US
5/25/2016 7:08am
huck wrote:
Aren't you the one that was just 'bragging' about the jumps at REM?
The Rock wrote:
Yes that was me. I was bragging that REM has five 150 footers, three 120 footers but the best is yet to come: Next REM there...
Yes that was me. I was bragging that REM has five 150 footers, three 120 footers but the best is yet to come:

Next REM there will be a 180 footer quintuple!

Seriously are you really that dense or just in a rush to be critical to imply REM jumps are the same as the 150 footer? Where's a face palm photo when you need one.

For the reading challenged Vitards please let me clarify:

1) MX definitely includes jumps
2) I don't want flat tracks devoid of any jumps
3) I don't want 100 foot jumps on my local track
4) I don't want to ride on a smooth outdoor SX track with a lot of jumps
5) I do want to ride and race on a rough gnarly outdoor MX track WITH reasonable jumps. This is why I am a REM fan.

BTW I would love to know how many of you big air tough guys even ride?

Same question about lifting. :-)

PS no answer from the guys saying REM is easy regarding if they've raced there. Classic blowhards
huck wrote:
You have lots of "EYES" in your post. What YOU consider big or dangerous, maybe somebody else considers fun. What you consider fun, maybe somebody else...
You have lots of "EYES" in your post.
What YOU consider big or dangerous, maybe somebody else considers fun. What you consider fun, maybe somebody else considers dangerous and big.

If you don't want to jump 150 footers, the simple solution is to not jump them.

I've ridden at REM and Glen Helen. I didn't jump the big step up jump at GH...but I also didn't start a campaign to have it shortened either....

I'm 43 with two 4yr olds at home and I willingly choose not to jump the 150 every time I ride out there. I proved myself in the '90's so I gotz nuttin' to prove now. Plus, I don't loose any time when I'm behind a kid that hucks it anyway.
huck
Posts
17025
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Mountain Home, AR US
5/25/2016 7:17am
slipdog wrote:
I'm 43 with two 4yr olds at home and I willingly choose not to jump the 150 every time I ride out there. I proved myself...
I'm 43 with two 4yr olds at home and I willingly choose not to jump the 150 every time I ride out there. I proved myself in the '90's so I gotz nuttin' to prove now. Plus, I don't loose any time when I'm behind a kid that hucks it anyway.
"At least somebody gets it. Thank you for taking the time to contribute."
MattE303
Posts
27
Joined
5/24/2016
Location
Paradise, TX US
5/25/2016 7:41am
aeffertz wrote:
"This jump is awesome!" -Justin Bogle, pro motocross racer that had to actually ride the track. "This jump is ruining the sport!" -Joe Blow, professional bench...
"This jump is awesome!"

-Justin Bogle, pro motocross racer that had to actually ride the track.

"This jump is ruining the sport!"

-Joe Blow, professional bench racer that watches through a TV screen.

Who should I side with? Whistling
mx836 wrote:
Ahhhh.....yes. Bogle is probably only the best jumper out there. Short didn't do it and we all know how much he sucks.
Last year pretty much all of the 450 (and a few 250) guys were hitting it and clearing it cleanly. All of those guys not doing it this year (or trying and coming up a little short) didn't suddenly get scared, the difference was a track design change; the corner before the 150 normally has a big outside berm, so guys at that skill level don't have too much trouble railing the outside and getting enough speed to clear the jump. But this year, for some reason, they added a bunch of dirt in that corner and filled in the inside so it was basically flat all the way across, no big outside berm, much harder to get the necessary speed to clear the triple cleanly.
The Rock
Posts
8758
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI US
5/25/2016 7:47am
huck wrote:
You have lots of "EYES" in your post. What YOU consider big or dangerous, maybe somebody else considers fun. What you consider fun, maybe somebody else...
You have lots of "EYES" in your post.
What YOU consider big or dangerous, maybe somebody else considers fun. What you consider fun, maybe somebody else considers dangerous and big.

If you don't want to jump 150 footers, the simple solution is to not jump them.

I've ridden at REM and Glen Helen. I didn't jump the big step up jump at GH...but I also didn't start a campaign to have it shortened either....

So now expressing one's opinion is starting a campaign?

Hope you didn't hurt yourself stretching that far.
The Rock
Posts
8758
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI US
5/25/2016 7:49am
seth505 wrote:
Really? Where are the numbers that prove this kind of claim? I can think of a few people off the top of my head who have...
Really? Where are the numbers that prove this kind of claim? I can think of a few people off the top of my head who have broken their neck on rough sections of different tracks and I don't know any who have done that on a jump.
You are right Seth and I couldn't be more wrong. No one ever gets hurt on jumps especially big ones.

Thanks for straightening me out.
seth505
Posts
10170
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SD, CA US
5/25/2016 8:07am
seth505 wrote:
Really? Where are the numbers that prove this kind of claim? I can think of a few people off the top of my head who have...
Really? Where are the numbers that prove this kind of claim? I can think of a few people off the top of my head who have broken their neck on rough sections of different tracks and I don't know any who have done that on a jump.
The Rock wrote:
You are right Seth and I couldn't be more wrong. No one ever gets hurt on jumps especially big ones.

Thanks for straightening me out.
Come on man, we all know people get hurt on any type of obstacle as far as mx goes. Hell, RV tore his knee going into a basic turn on an SX track.
If I happen to know a few people personally that have broken their neck on rough flat sections of track and none who have broken their neck on a jump, that says something about the sampling of injuries. That said, if we have a bunch of newb riders hit a 150 ft jump, we'll end up with some broken body parts but that is just stupid as everyone has a choice not to jump it. Plus, we are talking about a pro race here, there are pros who had hit 150 ft jumps by the time they were 12.
EEE299
Posts
418
Joined
8/21/2014
Location
NJ US
5/25/2016 8:07am
Jumps are too big, bikes are too fast, boobs are too awesome. If were talking about the good ole days. Maybe we should talk about the...
Jumps are too big, bikes are too fast, boobs are too awesome. If were talking about the good ole days. Maybe we should talk about the good ole days that middle aged men didn't know how to use a computer, or a cell phone
By far the best post in here Laughing Woohoo

I may have to quote you an that first part!!!
Benihana225
Posts
116
Joined
8/13/2015
Location
Orlando, FL US
5/25/2016 8:12am
Jumps are too big, bikes are too fast, boobs are too awesome. If were talking about the good ole days. Maybe we should talk about the...
Jumps are too big, bikes are too fast, boobs are too awesome. If were talking about the good ole days. Maybe we should talk about the good ole days that middle aged men didn't know how to use a computer, or a cell phone
EEE299 wrote:
By far the best post in here Laughing Woohoo

I may have to quote you an that first part!!!
Feel free
shanes
Posts
578
Joined
3/4/2014
Location
AD
5/25/2016 9:26am
Jumps are too big, bikes are too fast, boobs are too awesome. If were talking about the good ole days. Maybe we should talk about the...
Jumps are too big, bikes are too fast, boobs are too awesome. If were talking about the good ole days. Maybe we should talk about the good ole days that middle aged men didn't know how to use a computer, or a cell phone
EEE299 wrote:
By far the best post in here Laughing Woohoo

I may have to quote you an that first part!!!
Feel free
hmmmm boobies

Tracktor
Posts
2343
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
The RTF/Amboy, WA US
5/25/2016 9:39am
Everyone is missing the point. It's not dangerous because you are more likely to get hurt compared to a regular section, it's more dangerous because if...
Everyone is missing the point. It's not dangerous because you are more likely to get hurt compared to a regular section, it's more dangerous because if one little thing goes wrong you can be paralyzed or dead. A choppy section usually won't lead to serious injuries (usually) but 150 ft jumps can.
The Rock wrote:
At least somebody gets it. Thank you for taking the time to contribute.
Actually I don't think that is statistically accurate. Being around this sport and building tracks for years I have seen more serious injuries on rough high speed sections than "big jumps". A correctly built jump is probably one of the safest obstacles on a track & rough high speed straights or whoops the most dangerous...............
5/25/2016 9:53am
Boobs ARE too awesome - they might even make me try a 150' jump that I'll face.
NotCore
Posts
738
Joined
8/9/2011
Location
Alpharetta, GA US
5/25/2016 10:13am
seth505 wrote:
Really? Where are the numbers that prove this kind of claim? I can think of a few people off the top of my head who have...
Really? Where are the numbers that prove this kind of claim? I can think of a few people off the top of my head who have broken their neck on rough sections of different tracks and I don't know any who have done that on a jump.
The Rock wrote:
You are right Seth and I couldn't be more wrong. No one ever gets hurt on jumps especially big ones.

Thanks for straightening me out.
seth505 wrote:
Come on man, we all know people get hurt on any type of obstacle as far as mx goes. Hell, RV tore his knee going into...
Come on man, we all know people get hurt on any type of obstacle as far as mx goes. Hell, RV tore his knee going into a basic turn on an SX track.
If I happen to know a few people personally that have broken their neck on rough flat sections of track and none who have broken their neck on a jump, that says something about the sampling of injuries. That said, if we have a bunch of newb riders hit a 150 ft jump, we'll end up with some broken body parts but that is just stupid as everyone has a choice not to jump it. Plus, we are talking about a pro race here, there are pros who had hit 150 ft jumps by the time they were 12.
I like big jumps on pro tracks. But I don't need to commission a study to determine that when things go wrong, the result is likely worse over a 150ft jump than a 30 ft jump. My question to you Seth, is why would you argue this point?

With that being said, a 150 step up is safer than a 150 step down or flat jump. The track builders are doing it right in terms of safety in this regard.
Buster B
Posts
8
Joined
5/24/2016
Location
Boise, ID US
5/25/2016 10:20am
I am glad I do not live in SoCal and have to deal with this Rock character on a daily basis at the track. My girlfriend bitches and moans enough at home, don't need it when I am getttin' my ride on.
NotCore
Posts
738
Joined
8/9/2011
Location
Alpharetta, GA US
5/25/2016 10:22am
Jumps are too big, bikes are too fast, boobs are too awesome. If were talking about the good ole days. Maybe we should talk about the...
Jumps are too big, bikes are too fast, boobs are too awesome. If were talking about the good ole days. Maybe we should talk about the good ole days that middle aged men didn't know how to use a computer, or a cell phone
The middle aged men invented all the things you mentioned, and appear to covet.

And the days before cell phones and computers were better, You could take off, do what you wanted all day, and when you got back, you just said, 'sorry' couldn't find a phone. Your wife, your mom, or your boss would shrug, and that was the end of it, Nobody in your business. Life was good. But we had to invent this crap, so people could all migrate to become nagging wives, and complain about everything all day. Be careful what you wish for. Take a look at Pam Anderson lately?

seth505
Posts
10170
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SD, CA US
5/25/2016 10:29am
The Rock wrote:
You are right Seth and I couldn't be more wrong. No one ever gets hurt on jumps especially big ones.

Thanks for straightening me out.
seth505 wrote:
Come on man, we all know people get hurt on any type of obstacle as far as mx goes. Hell, RV tore his knee going into...
Come on man, we all know people get hurt on any type of obstacle as far as mx goes. Hell, RV tore his knee going into a basic turn on an SX track.
If I happen to know a few people personally that have broken their neck on rough flat sections of track and none who have broken their neck on a jump, that says something about the sampling of injuries. That said, if we have a bunch of newb riders hit a 150 ft jump, we'll end up with some broken body parts but that is just stupid as everyone has a choice not to jump it. Plus, we are talking about a pro race here, there are pros who had hit 150 ft jumps by the time they were 12.
NotCore wrote:
I like big jumps on pro tracks. But I don't need to commission a study to determine that when things go wrong, the result is likely...
I like big jumps on pro tracks. But I don't need to commission a study to determine that when things go wrong, the result is likely worse over a 150ft jump than a 30 ft jump. My question to you Seth, is why would you argue this point?

With that being said, a 150 step up is safer than a 150 step down or flat jump. The track builders are doing it right in terms of safety in this regard.
My answer is that I wasn't arguing that. What you quoted has no discussion of large jumps vs small jumps. All I brought up was large jumps vs other parts of a track (not jumps). I agree with larger the jump, larger the consequences but that goes along with anything fun that is challenging (risk/reward).

If we are discussing 30 ft. jumps, I definitely don't care to watch pros hit a jump smaller than ones I hit on a mountain bike.
Phillip_Lamb
Posts
2049
Joined
12/14/2010
Location
ORANGEVALE, CA US
5/25/2016 10:33am
aeffertz wrote:
"This jump is awesome!" -Justin Bogle, pro motocross racer that had to actually ride the track. "This jump is ruining the sport!" -Joe Blow, professional bench...
"This jump is awesome!"

-Justin Bogle, pro motocross racer that had to actually ride the track.

"This jump is ruining the sport!"

-Joe Blow, professional bench racer that watches through a TV screen.

Who should I side with? Whistling
mx836 wrote:
Ahhhh.....yes. Bogle is probably only the best jumper out there. Short didn't do it and we all know how much he sucks.
MattE303 wrote:
Last year pretty much all of the 450 (and a few 250) guys were hitting it and clearing it cleanly. All of those guys not doing...
Last year pretty much all of the 450 (and a few 250) guys were hitting it and clearing it cleanly. All of those guys not doing it this year (or trying and coming up a little short) didn't suddenly get scared, the difference was a track design change; the corner before the 150 normally has a big outside berm, so guys at that skill level don't have too much trouble railing the outside and getting enough speed to clear the jump. But this year, for some reason, they added a bunch of dirt in that corner and filled in the inside so it was basically flat all the way across, no big outside berm, much harder to get the necessary speed to clear the triple cleanly.
actually maybe 9 guys did it last year with no consistency barring tomac. and only one guy, AC went for it and cased it.

i actually like the way the jump is built. i like the option of staying low and i prefer the "hill" as opposed to how it used to be with a jump down the backside (which both me and my brother were hurt on).

honestly the way the jump is built it is relatively safe, it has a large landing zone so margin of error is good, and the face was kept smooth. most people i see get hurt are due to a jump getting rough and sketchy with ruts kickers, and i see more people with regular injuries from cartwheeling through some rough section without jumps o
JWACK
Posts
2560
Joined
8/7/2009
Location
NM US
5/25/2016 10:41am
On a new 450. 150 feet isn't that far. 3rd ripping depending on the face of the jump.. Pro motocross is a young mans sport that's not for sissies. In my opinion If you can't jump your motorcycle over 150ft confidently these days I don't think you have any business racing professional motocross. Now ameture racing is a different story.
kkawboy14
Posts
11486
Joined
6/5/2015
Location
TX US
5/25/2016 10:43am Edited Date/Time 5/25/2016 10:44am
JWACK wrote:
On a new 450. 150 feet isn't that far. 3rd ripping depending on the face of the jump.. Pro motocross is a young mans sport that's...
On a new 450. 150 feet isn't that far. 3rd ripping depending on the face of the jump.. Pro motocross is a young mans sport that's not for sissies. In my opinion If you can't jump your motorcycle over 150ft confidently these days I don't think you have any business racing professional motocross. Now ameture racing is a different story.
Is it truly 150' or do they somehow factor in the stepup aspect of the jump? Because if it's 150 AND stepping up, whew that's a big jump
JWACK
Posts
2560
Joined
8/7/2009
Location
NM US
5/25/2016 10:49am
JWACK wrote:
On a new 450. 150 feet isn't that far. 3rd ripping depending on the face of the jump.. Pro motocross is a young mans sport that's...
On a new 450. 150 feet isn't that far. 3rd ripping depending on the face of the jump.. Pro motocross is a young mans sport that's not for sissies. In my opinion If you can't jump your motorcycle over 150ft confidently these days I don't think you have any business racing professional motocross. Now ameture racing is a different story.
kkawboy14 wrote:
Is it truly 150' or do they somehow factor in the stepup aspect of the jump? Because if it's 150 AND stepping up, whew that's a...
Is it truly 150' or do they somehow factor in the stepup aspect of the jump? Because if it's 150 AND stepping up, whew that's a big jump
I'm not sure how they factor it. But I have always measured from the time the wheels leave the ground till they land. Just air distance.
MattE303
Posts
27
Joined
5/24/2016
Location
Paradise, TX US
5/25/2016 11:14am Edited Date/Time 5/25/2016 11:15am
actually maybe 9 guys did it last year with no consistency barring tomac. and only one guy, AC went for it and cased it. i actually...
actually maybe 9 guys did it last year with no consistency barring tomac. and only one guy, AC went for it and cased it.

i actually like the way the jump is built. i like the option of staying low and i prefer the "hill" as opposed to how it used to be with a jump down the backside (which both me and my brother were hurt on).

honestly the way the jump is built it is relatively safe, it has a large landing zone so margin of error is good, and the face was kept smooth. most people i see get hurt are due to a jump getting rough and sketchy with ruts kickers, and i see more people with regular injuries from cartwheeling through some rough section without jumps o
you're right, went back and watched some of the 1st 450 from last last year, not as many guys as I thought I remembered hitting it. I agree it looked pretty forgiving for the guys that did sack up and hit it this year; I stood right by the 150 for most of the 1st 450 moto and lots of guys were coming up a little short and bouncing, but I only saw one crash all day there. Only a couple guys seemed to be able to really backside it cleanly every lap; Seely and Bogle had it dialed.
FreshTopEnd
Posts
12988
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA US
5/25/2016 11:28am
JWACK wrote:
On a new 450. 150 feet isn't that far. 3rd ripping depending on the face of the jump.. Pro motocross is a young mans sport that's...
On a new 450. 150 feet isn't that far. 3rd ripping depending on the face of the jump.. Pro motocross is a young mans sport that's not for sissies. In my opinion If you can't jump your motorcycle over 150ft confidently these days I don't think you have any business racing professional motocross. Now ameture racing is a different story.
kkawboy14 wrote:
Is it truly 150' or do they somehow factor in the stepup aspect of the jump? Because if it's 150 AND stepping up, whew that's a...
Is it truly 150' or do they somehow factor in the stepup aspect of the jump? Because if it's 150 AND stepping up, whew that's a big jump
JWACK wrote:
I'm not sure how they factor it. But I have always measured from the time the wheels leave the ground till they land. Just air distance.
Yup, it's a 150' jump for the guy who lands a 150' from take off.

It's certainly not the riskiest part of the Hangtown track, and about as forgiving as any jump that big could be.

It seems like this is one of those deals where people are mixing different issues. If the point is big artificial jumps are not part of motocross, that's just a difference of opinion and a subjective thing. If the point is that big jumps are too dangerous for motocross, that is a risk issue that ought to be tied to data and not beg the question of whether a feature is designed well by using "big jump" as a proxy for bad. A badly designed small jump may be a bigger risk, especially to nonpros. Shoot, Bailey was paralyzed trying to work a line off what was no more a small mound.

kkawboy14
Posts
11486
Joined
6/5/2015
Location
TX US
5/25/2016 12:01pm Edited Date/Time 5/25/2016 12:01pm
JWACK wrote:
On a new 450. 150 feet isn't that far. 3rd ripping depending on the face of the jump.. Pro motocross is a young mans sport that's...
On a new 450. 150 feet isn't that far. 3rd ripping depending on the face of the jump.. Pro motocross is a young mans sport that's not for sissies. In my opinion If you can't jump your motorcycle over 150ft confidently these days I don't think you have any business racing professional motocross. Now ameture racing is a different story.
kkawboy14 wrote:
Is it truly 150' or do they somehow factor in the stepup aspect of the jump? Because if it's 150 AND stepping up, whew that's a...
Is it truly 150' or do they somehow factor in the stepup aspect of the jump? Because if it's 150 AND stepping up, whew that's a big jump
JWACK wrote:
I'm not sure how they factor it. But I have always measured from the time the wheels leave the ground till they land. Just air distance.
That's what I would think!

But like golf if your hitting 150' uphill, you gotta hit it like its 200'.....that is just crazy!

Post a reply to: Hangtown 150' Jump

The Latest