Who here owns/or has ridden a 500AF?

holeshot413
Posts
688
Joined
2/24/2008
Location
Prosperity, SC, USA
12/21/2015 7:47pm
sick machine!!!
So I added a Stealhy 13 oz. Flywheel how did you get it too fit?? Even Stealy tells me it wont fit? PM if necessary thanks!
Cancerman wrote:
I was told I might need to stack an extra gasket or two, but I installed the weight and used one gasket with the boyesen ignition...
I was told I might need to stack an extra gasket or two, but I installed the weight and used one gasket with the boyesen ignition cover and had no problems. My engine is an 87 model with stock ignition. I never tried it with the stock plastic cover.
is it the same spacewise, between your 87 engine and my 98?
Cancerman
Posts
757
Joined
7/16/2011
Location
In Hell, FL, USA
12/21/2015 10:18pm
I would think so, the only thing I know of that is different is the RH outer case that houses the waterpump. The 89 clutch has an extra plate, so the basket, etc is different. The RH case that the clutch cover goes on sticks out a little more. After reading your post today, I was worried that maybe my weight Was rubbing, so after riding it today, I took it off just to be sure. There are no contact marks whatsoever on it. I can take a pic if you want to see what things look like. The weight is stated to fit 87-01. Let me know how I can help.
cmotodad
Posts
1008
Joined
12/18/2013
Location
Yorba Linda, CA, USA
12/21/2015 11:29pm
Older than 89 engines need the case bushings drilled to fit the larger swingarm bolt. The 89 and older engine makes it a little tougher to use the lowboy pipe needed on an AF. As far as vibrations go, when a 500 starts to get a little loose in the main bearings, they tend to vibrate more and that is transferred to the chassis. I have built a few and the ones with fresher motors vibrated less. Balanced motors are better but they are still a big bore, single-cylinder 2 stroke. I really enjoy riding my steel framed KX500 and CR500AF btu go faster on my450. I like the KX power better but the Honda quality is superior IMO.
holeshot413
Posts
688
Joined
2/24/2008
Location
Prosperity, SC, USA
12/22/2015 7:00am
Cancerman wrote:
I would think so, the only thing I know of that is different is the RH outer case that houses the waterpump. The 89 clutch has...
I would think so, the only thing I know of that is different is the RH outer case that houses the waterpump. The 89 clutch has an extra plate, so the basket, etc is different. The RH case that the clutch cover goes on sticks out a little more. After reading your post today, I was worried that maybe my weight Was rubbing, so after riding it today, I took it off just to be sure. There are no contact marks whatsoever on it. I can take a pic if you want to see what things look like. The weight is stated to fit 87-01. Let me know how I can help.
pics would be great!!

The Shop

plynn41
Posts
153
Joined
5/10/2012
Location
Jonesboro, AR, USA
12/22/2015 9:31am
I've been racing a '05 CRF250R chassis with a later model CR500 engine for the last couple of years, and have had 500s for the last 5 years. I won the Arkansas State Motocross Championship 50+ vet class this year on it. I love the bike, and enjoy the looks and feedback in the pits that it gets, but I'm definitely faster on about anything else. I rode my son's '12 KTM250SX at one event this year and was instantly faster on that bike. The 500 is very tiring to ride, and I am in pretty good shape for my age.
I've got a CR250R ignition on my bike with a 10oz flywheel weight. I do recommend this. Bike is very easy to start, idles well, and doesn't stall in the corners like it used to with the 250 ignition and no flywheel weight. Also doesn't break the rear tire loose as badly coming out of corners. I run a PWK 38mm carb off of a YZ250 that I taper bored last year to 40mm. Pipe is a ProCircuit. The power of the bike is reasonably linear, but definitely not as strong as the 450's off of the bottom. I catch them in the mid-range, but have to shift more often than a 450.
Get one if you want one, but remember to practice good body position on the bike. A 500 2-stroke is the worst bike to get whisky throttle on. It's not very forgiving if you get out of shape on a whoop or roller section. I also learned to jump most jumps a gear higher than absolutely necessary to avoid unexpected sky wheelies. I had a bad get off last June when the throttle stuck WFO in 3rd gear and it threw me off the back. Result: broken tail bone, 2 sprained ankles and whiplash.
cmotodad
Posts
1008
Joined
12/18/2013
Location
Yorba Linda, CA, USA
12/22/2015 9:47am
Did you ride the bike with the 250 ignition first or did you put the flywheel right on it? I like the 250 ignition for turn in and curious if the flywheel changed that. My bike starts fine with the 250 ignition too.
Moto_Geek
Posts
1826
Joined
6/26/2007
Location
Golden, CO, USA
12/22/2015 9:58am
Im 53 My AF was built on a 2006 Honda CR 250 R frame, 2 stroke, 98 CR 500 motor, I absolutely love it way lighter...
Im 53 My AF was built on a 2006 Honda CR 250 R frame, 2 stroke, 98 CR 500 motor, I absolutely love it way lighter than my 450. I never lack power, and have tamed it with gearing. It starts great, runs and handles awesome, the vibration is NOT noticeable more or less than my yz 250 2 smoke. Ive had it just about a year now and love it. I still have my 450, a 250 2 stroke but this 500 makes me smile. The only thing ONLY is that this Honda suspension is not as good as my Yamaha suspension, Ive revalved it twice now trying to get that SSS feel and Im getting it closer but...
here is my race a week ago
https://youtu.be/PgvSR1RgQyY
Anger management issues at 6:50 mark.. "common.. Fuck!!!" Actually this is great video. Guess shows 500 can be fun no matter how fast you ride it.
plynn41
Posts
153
Joined
5/10/2012
Location
Jonesboro, AR, USA
12/22/2015 10:00am
I've only rode this bike with the 250 ignition, but experimented with 500 and 250 ignitions on previous bikes. On my old '88 steel frame, I couldn't tell much difference in cornering with either ignition, but I suck at cornering. I suppose the 10oz flywheel weight on this current bike more or less makes up the difference in weight on the smaller 250 flywheel, but I've never been able to learn what is the actual difference in weight between a 500 and 250 flywheel.
Moto_Geek
Posts
1826
Joined
6/26/2007
Location
Golden, CO, USA
12/22/2015 10:08am
Cancerman wrote:
[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/12/20/116072/s1200_1114151512a.jpg[/img] OK, here we go.......I built my own RM500AF using a 07RMZ250 chassis, and a 87CR500 motor. I chose the RMZ 250, as I wanted a...


OK, here we go.......I built my own RM500AF using a 07RMZ250 chassis, and a 87CR500 motor. I chose the RMZ 250, as I wanted a lighter, narrower chassis. The RMZ450 was a little stiff and heavy feeling. The aluminum CR's and my CRF450 always transmitted too much stiffness and would wear me out. The RMZ250 never felt that way to me. At first it was a little spooky. I started with suspension balance, or should I say chassis balance. Getting your sag correct vs your steering angle(forks up and down in the clamps). Once I found that, and reduced the HS compression, then slowed the rebound down also. I had to stiffen the forks from .44 springs to .47 springs. Big difference. Now it feels balanced, goes straight, does not swap, and turn almost automatic. The Suzuki trait. I may try a lowering link next, for more chassis tuning and lower the bike height some.

Now for the engine. A lot of people are afraid of the big bore 2 stroke 500's. I've played with several pipes and such. The 87 chassis config had a PSI pipe, it was brutal. Flat, then boom. No amount of jetting helped. So I've tried a FMF fatty, still a pretty good kick, but better. The FMF Narly pipe is great off the bottom, but you lose too much top end. I then tried the PC. That was the ticket. Good low end, strong middle, revs out great. No blast, just keeps building. Then I dumped the PJ carb, and added a PWK 39.5. Another big plus. Great, clean low end, strong mid and top. I still felt it rushed through the power, breaking the rear tire a bit much though. Normal for a CR500. So I added a Stealhy 13 oz. Flywheel weight. About as perfect as you can get. It did not slow the rev much, but just enough. The aftermarket ignition covers fit, no problems. I also took a tooth off the rear sprocket, to a 14/50 config. It really helps reduce stalling in tight turns, as well.

I'm 57, in poor health trying to get back from cancer issues/complications. Building this has been great therapy. I'm slowly getting faster on a track with it. I'm usually riding with 17 year old kids, I'm chasing them. Any straight away, I can eat anything up, other than another 500 2t. The power is almost 4T, but just enough 2t to keep it fun. Everyone I've let ride this thing, loves it. Lug it, rev it, just respect it. I've been riding/racing for 45 years. I think I've found my ultimate bike. I can off road it, woods, mx, maybe not trials thoughWink .

I also have an RM125, and a KLX thumper. I've owned well over 50 bikes, including a CRF450. I really can't imagine wanting anything else. Maybe a trials bike to ride in the yard.Tongue

Oh, and as far as vibration goes, it does not vibrate any more than it did in the steel frame. My AF Honda's vibrated me more than this does. And, nothing has broke or fell off so far, either. Just my experience. It is badass.Evil
After reading this, I somehow have "I touch my self" song stuck in my head.

https://youtu.be/wv-34w8kGPM
holeshot413
Posts
688
Joined
2/24/2008
Location
Prosperity, SC, USA
12/22/2015 5:34pm
Im 53 My AF was built on a 2006 Honda CR 250 R frame, 2 stroke, 98 CR 500 motor, I absolutely love it way lighter...
Im 53 My AF was built on a 2006 Honda CR 250 R frame, 2 stroke, 98 CR 500 motor, I absolutely love it way lighter than my 450. I never lack power, and have tamed it with gearing. It starts great, runs and handles awesome, the vibration is NOT noticeable more or less than my yz 250 2 smoke. Ive had it just about a year now and love it. I still have my 450, a 250 2 stroke but this 500 makes me smile. The only thing ONLY is that this Honda suspension is not as good as my Yamaha suspension, Ive revalved it twice now trying to get that SSS feel and Im getting it closer but...
here is my race a week ago
https://youtu.be/PgvSR1RgQyY
Moto_Geek wrote:
Anger management issues at 6:50 mark.. "common.. Fuck!!!" Actually this is great video. Guess shows 500 can be fun no matter how fast you ride it.
Anger management issues at 6:50 mark.. "common.. Fuck!!!" Actually this is great video. Guess shows 500 can be fun no matter how fast you ride it.
sometimes, I get frustrated Sad Ill take my pills the next race Smile
T.Page
Posts
116
Joined
11/23/2014
Location
Swanzey, NH, USA
12/22/2015 6:03pm
I like my Service Honda allot. Fun bike and easy to ride.



holeshot413
Posts
688
Joined
2/24/2008
Location
Prosperity, SC, USA
12/22/2015 6:51pm
T.Page wrote:
I like my Service Honda allot. Fun bike and easy to ride.[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/12/22/116409/s1200_IMG_20150918_094018013.jpg[/img] [img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/12/22/116410/s1200_IMG_20150310_192548021.jpg[/img]
I like my Service Honda allot. Fun bike and easy to ride.



sweet machine!
Cancerman
Posts
757
Joined
7/16/2011
Location
In Hell, FL, USA
12/22/2015 8:05pm
Cancerman wrote:
I would think so, the only thing I know of that is different is the RH outer case that houses the waterpump. The 89 clutch has...
I would think so, the only thing I know of that is different is the RH outer case that houses the waterpump. The 89 clutch has an extra plate, so the basket, etc is different. The RH case that the clutch cover goes on sticks out a little more. After reading your post today, I was worried that maybe my weight Was rubbing, so after riding it today, I took it off just to be sure. There are no contact marks whatsoever on it. I can take a pic if you want to see what things look like. The weight is stated to fit 87-01. Let me know how I can help.
pics would be great!!
I'll shoot a pic of the Ignition cover, weight, etc, tomorrow morning before I go out for my daily ride on it. I'm having too much fun.Woohoo I think all this talk about how hard they are to ride is to learn to ride smooth, and use the low and mid power. If you ride it all the time in the 65 HP zone, it does get tiring. When you figure it out, having that power on tap means you can use it when you need it. Relax a bit when you ride it. If I ride it like I ride my 125, I'd be back in the hospital.Blink
T.Page
Posts
116
Joined
11/23/2014
Location
Swanzey, NH, USA
12/22/2015 8:05pm
Thanks.
Cancerman
Posts
757
Joined
7/16/2011
Location
In Hell, FL, USA
12/22/2015 8:08pm
T.Page wrote:
I like my Service Honda allot. Fun bike and easy to ride.[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/12/22/116409/s1200_IMG_20150918_094018013.jpg[/img] [img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/12/22/116410/s1200_IMG_20150310_192548021.jpg[/img]
I like my Service Honda allot. Fun bike and easy to ride.



I'm a Suzuki guy, but that is one clean CR500AF. That could be OEM. Needs boyesen side covers. Bling!Wink
T.Page
Posts
116
Joined
11/23/2014
Location
Swanzey, NH, USA
12/23/2015 2:34am
Thank you.
davis224
Posts
7516
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Cornland, IL, USA
Fantasy
12/23/2015 4:31am
Well I feel like I've been mostly talked out of it. Anybody in Illinois have one they'd be willing to let me test ride?
12/23/2015 4:33am
20 years riding a 500, had my AF for a while, although I don't have a LOT of time on it. It's off being redone by...
20 years riding a 500, had my AF for a while, although I don't have a LOT of time on it. It's off being redone by a REAL fabricator, that POS Fanelli built is a memory. A bad one, but a memory nonetheless. No question that the AF is great choice for that 500, the Steelies were a pig in comparison.

First off, how much experience do you have on a 500, to begin with? That's a huge part of the equation. If you have none, or close to none, I'd say don't do it. That's a lot of motor, if you aren't familiar with it, this could be your worst spend ever. There is no doubt, the 500 will be harder to ride than the 450, even in the same chassis. I could go on and on about this, pointing out the negatives. If you strictly want a bike that will be an absolute thrill ride, and don't care about lap times, then pull the trigger. Metaphorically speaking, wait 'til you do that on the AF. Evil

The 10 is a decent chassis, but it will still have the handling it did as a 4 stroke, nothing will change that. There are a couple of places that sell kits to do this swap, and guys on FB who offer their services as well. It will cost a decent buck to get a conversion done, don't kid yourself. However, finding a good guy is worth every dime, because using a cheap shop means huge disappointment. Let me know if you want to get more info, I can get you onto the CR500 Conversion on FB, assuming you have a page already. A guy from Illinois does conversions, cranks out all the parts himself, quality stuff. Google M-Works, guys name is Mike. Another guy in Ohio, just do your homework. If you use MPS, don't tell me, and don't ever speak to me again. Lol You've been warned.

Lastly, don't expect an AF to turn you into the next Ricky Carmicheal, ain't going to happen. They are just a blast to ride, and they command respect and attention. Fun factor goes through the roof, though. Isn't that why we ride?
DrSweden wrote:
That's the best "sums up" read ever on a AF. Decades of experience goes into that paragraph. Tnx Andy.
This is the truth. After20-30 minutes, your concentration needs to be on point, because it demands respect. It is a great bike for a second ride to have around, 450s are easier to race hands down. As for vibration, I only ever noticed it at a standing idle, especially when it's not warmed up.

That being said, 500s are another world and an absolute blast. 3rd gear holeshots for days (touchy on concrete), and in some vet classes, that's all you need to do and hang on!
12/23/2015 5:26am
I've raced multiple 500s competitively. Here's what I've found. Opinions can and will vary.

1. The best chassis for that bike is the 02-07 250 frame. They just handle better than the four-stroke frames. for one reason or another, the front end is very vague when it is in the 05-08, 09-12, or 13+ frame. The front tire is consistently 4 inches to the outside of where you try to put it.
2. If you keep it on the pipe, you dont have to worry about the hit. So it hits hard at 6,500rpms? You'd never know if it never drops below 7,000. The powervalve is the lever on the left side of the bars. (Similar to guys who say one 125 is better than the other because it has more bottom end... are you lugging a 125?)
3. The best combination for going fast on a 500 on an MX track is just putting Showa twinchambers and the bigger brake on a 91+ steel chassis. Sorry guys.
4. yes, a 450 is better for casual riders. But if a diehard were to ride/train/set-up a 500 as his primary bike, you could actually be faster on the 500 simply because it's a 10+hp advantage, and 15lbs lighter right under the gas tank.
Nom DeGuerre
Posts
173
Joined
12/20/2015
Location
Cheyenne, WY, USA
12/23/2015 7:19am
Spend the bux and get the Vortex, lots of flexibility in mapping, etc. If you don't like it, you should be able to sell it without much loss.
Cancerman
Posts
757
Joined
7/16/2011
Location
In Hell, FL, USA
12/23/2015 9:10am
Cancerman wrote:
I would think so, the only thing I know of that is different is the RH outer case that houses the waterpump. The 89 clutch has...
I would think so, the only thing I know of that is different is the RH outer case that houses the waterpump. The 89 clutch has an extra plate, so the basket, etc is different. The RH case that the clutch cover goes on sticks out a little more. After reading your post today, I was worried that maybe my weight Was rubbing, so after riding it today, I took it off just to be sure. There are no contact marks whatsoever on it. I can take a pic if you want to see what things look like. The weight is stated to fit 87-01. Let me know how I can help.
pics would be great!!
Cancerman wrote:
I'll shoot a pic of the Ignition cover, weight, etc, tomorrow morning before I go out for my daily ride on it. I'm having too much...
I'll shoot a pic of the Ignition cover, weight, etc, tomorrow morning before I go out for my daily ride on it. I'm having too much fun.Woohoo I think all this talk about how hard they are to ride is to learn to ride smooth, and use the low and mid power. If you ride it all the time in the 65 HP zone, it does get tiring. When you figure it out, having that power on tap means you can use it when you need it. Relax a bit when you ride it. If I ride it like I ride my 125, I'd be back in the hospital.Blink




After doing a little research, I think from the Honda parts micros, there are 4 different part numbers for Ignitions and flywheels, and that is for the 87-01 CR500. The 85-86 is different as well. Stealhy indicates that the 87-01 flywheel weight can be adapted to the 85-86. I measured the distance from the cover mounting surface to the center flat surface of the flywheel (most outside of weight)is 21 mm. I hope this helps. I expected to possibly need more clearance, as my RM250 and 125 needed a spacer or different cover. I planned to make a spacer if needed, as all my RM's benefited greatly from the weight. I used the 8 oz on the 250 and the 5 oz (very rare) on the 125. It thickened up the power band. Less stalling, all the stuff everyone talks about. I see no negatives as long as you don't go too heavy. When I first put the 500 weight on, I was a little disappointed, as I didn't see a difference. Once I went out for while and rode it hard, then I could see all the benefits. I would never consider taking it off. It works for me, I hear all the talk about standing up in the turns, etc. Being that my 500 is in a Suzuki chassis, the thing turns great. The only bike that turns easier, I feel, is my RM125. Riding an RM125 is like riding a broomstick with a motor.
Cancerman
Posts
757
Joined
7/16/2011
Location
In Hell, FL, USA
12/23/2015 9:33am
I've raced multiple 500s competitively. Here's what I've found. Opinions can and will vary. 1. The best chassis for that bike is the 02-07 250 frame...
I've raced multiple 500s competitively. Here's what I've found. Opinions can and will vary.

1. The best chassis for that bike is the 02-07 250 frame. They just handle better than the four-stroke frames. for one reason or another, the front end is very vague when it is in the 05-08, 09-12, or 13+ frame. The front tire is consistently 4 inches to the outside of where you try to put it.
2. If you keep it on the pipe, you dont have to worry about the hit. So it hits hard at 6,500rpms? You'd never know if it never drops below 7,000. The powervalve is the lever on the left side of the bars. (Similar to guys who say one 125 is better than the other because it has more bottom end... are you lugging a 125?)
3. The best combination for going fast on a 500 on an MX track is just putting Showa twinchambers and the bigger brake on a 91+ steel chassis. Sorry guys.
4. yes, a 450 is better for casual riders. But if a diehard were to ride/train/set-up a 500 as his primary bike, you could actually be faster on the 500 simply because it's a 10+hp advantage, and 15lbs lighter right under the gas tank.
You have some interesting points:

1. AJ, from service Honda, has stated that the 02-07 CR250 has a very dated feel, compared to the more refined and developed 4T chassis, that is why they used the 4T chassis. If you ride a 02-07 2T chassis 500AF, then jump on a 4T 500AF, the difference is immediately noticed. Not that the 02-07 2T is bad, but the 4T is just a more modern, refined feel.

2.As far as the "Hit" goes, you want some hit, after all, it's a 2 stroke. That was the problem with the 02-07 CR250's, there was no real hit. There are advantages in riding a motor in the lower rpm range. Mainly, you don't load the rear suspension. I upshift my 500 anywhere it's really rough, it's really noticeable. You don't want to ride a 500 2T like a 250 unless it's powerband is way up there. If it is, somethings wrong. As far as the 125 thing goes, having more lower power makes is easier to recover from mistakes, and again, riding in the rough stuff rear suspension wise. And I agree though, what is "Low End" on a 125? Does it really exists? Not on a racing 125 engine, but you get my point.

3. I know you feel that the 91+ chassis is the best, but I think there are narrower, better chassis. I like steel frame Hondas myself, I have 2, and the early Aluminum chassis beat me to death. I've had a 98, 01, 04, and they all beat me to death. That's why I did my 500AF with an RMZ250 chassis. Feels softer, narrower, etc. And it has twin chambers, stock. Easy to dial in, lots of spring choices, valving data available.

4. Yep, a Four stroke is more forgiving, but my CRF 450 wore me out way faster than my RM500AF does. But again, it's not for everyone, but you can say the same for 4 strokes.
brewrabb
Posts
362
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
CA
12/23/2015 10:19am
Has anyone tried the Kx500 motor in a '05-'07 steel frame from a Kx? The LaPorte/Emler bike using the cromo frame from a SX250 mated to a Kx500 motor seemed to get good reviews.
holeshot413
Posts
688
Joined
2/24/2008
Location
Prosperity, SC, USA
12/23/2015 3:46pm
pics would be great!!
Cancerman wrote:
I'll shoot a pic of the Ignition cover, weight, etc, tomorrow morning before I go out for my daily ride on it. I'm having too much...
I'll shoot a pic of the Ignition cover, weight, etc, tomorrow morning before I go out for my daily ride on it. I'm having too much fun.Woohoo I think all this talk about how hard they are to ride is to learn to ride smooth, and use the low and mid power. If you ride it all the time in the 65 HP zone, it does get tiring. When you figure it out, having that power on tap means you can use it when you need it. Relax a bit when you ride it. If I ride it like I ride my 125, I'd be back in the hospital.Blink
Cancerman wrote:
[img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/12/23/116483/s1200_1223151003.jpg[/img] [img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2015/12/23/116484/s1200_1223151001a.jpg[/img] After doing a little research, I think from the Honda parts micros, there are 4 different part numbers for Ignitions and flywheels, and that...




After doing a little research, I think from the Honda parts micros, there are 4 different part numbers for Ignitions and flywheels, and that is for the 87-01 CR500. The 85-86 is different as well. Stealhy indicates that the 87-01 flywheel weight can be adapted to the 85-86. I measured the distance from the cover mounting surface to the center flat surface of the flywheel (most outside of weight)is 21 mm. I hope this helps. I expected to possibly need more clearance, as my RM250 and 125 needed a spacer or different cover. I planned to make a spacer if needed, as all my RM's benefited greatly from the weight. I used the 8 oz on the 250 and the 5 oz (very rare) on the 125. It thickened up the power band. Less stalling, all the stuff everyone talks about. I see no negatives as long as you don't go too heavy. When I first put the 500 weight on, I was a little disappointed, as I didn't see a difference. Once I went out for while and rode it hard, then I could see all the benefits. I would never consider taking it off. It works for me, I hear all the talk about standing up in the turns, etc. Being that my 500 is in a Suzuki chassis, the thing turns great. The only bike that turns easier, I feel, is my RM125. Riding an RM125 is like riding a broomstick with a motor.
Thanks so much for the pic, I just ordered one from Rocky Mountain Smile Cant wait to out it on and race with it!
holeshot413
Posts
688
Joined
2/24/2008
Location
Prosperity, SC, USA
12/25/2015 11:43am
I put on the flywheel today, Merry CHRISTmas to me, fit perfect and bikes sounds so much smoother just on the bike stand. Cant wait to race it January 2 16!!
Cancerman
Posts
757
Joined
7/16/2011
Location
In Hell, FL, USA
12/26/2015 12:12pm
If you can, take it out for some test riding to get used to it. Oh, and I like your video! You role pretty good for an old guy like me. I'm 57. I'm slowly trying to work my way back into a condition to race safely. Right now it's a little iffy. I would of yelled at that guy too. Done it lots, and the panic rev as well. You look like you respect you 500. Let me know how it goes for you.
slipdog
Posts
10054
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Nor Cal, CA, USA
12/26/2015 12:45pm
brewrabb wrote:
Has anyone tried the Kx500 motor in a '05-'07 steel frame from a Kx? The LaPorte/Emler bike using the cromo frame from a SX250 mated to...
Has anyone tried the Kx500 motor in a '05-'07 steel frame from a Kx? The LaPorte/Emler bike using the cromo frame from a SX250 mated to a Kx500 motor seemed to get good reviews.
Funny I found this thread because I just emailed an offer to a guy that has an '05 steel frame kxf250 with a kx500 motor fabbed into it. He said open to trades so I offered up my low hour '08 CRF 450...
holeshot413
Posts
688
Joined
2/24/2008
Location
Prosperity, SC, USA
12/26/2015 4:33pm
Cancerman wrote:
If you can, take it out for some test riding to get used to it. Oh, and I like your video! You role pretty good for...
If you can, take it out for some test riding to get used to it. Oh, and I like your video! You role pretty good for an old guy like me. I'm 57. I'm slowly trying to work my way back into a condition to race safely. Right now it's a little iffy. I would of yelled at that guy too. Done it lots, and the panic rev as well. You look like you respect you 500. Let me know how it goes for you.
I will update you hopefully tomorrow at Glen Helen. I do feel Im respecting it and careful when riding, I know pain all too well Smile
holeshot413
Posts
688
Joined
2/24/2008
Location
Prosperity, SC, USA
12/27/2015 2:25pm Edited Date/Time 12/27/2015 3:06pm
Cancerman wrote:
If you can, take it out for some test riding to get used to it. Oh, and I like your video! You role pretty good for...
If you can, take it out for some test riding to get used to it. Oh, and I like your video! You role pretty good for an old guy like me. I'm 57. I'm slowly trying to work my way back into a condition to race safely. Right now it's a little iffy. I would of yelled at that guy too. Done it lots, and the panic rev as well. You look like you respect you 500. Let me know how it goes for you.
I will update you hopefully tomorrow at Glen Helen. I do feel Im respecting it and careful when riding, I know pain all too well Smile
WOW , what a huge difference! So much smoother, better bottom end and better traction. I shoulda got this a year ago...Smile
Track was crap and dry and dusty so it was a good test!

Post a reply to: Who here owns/or has ridden a 500AF?

The Latest