Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
C & P of the important stuff.
Well, with a lot of effort, over the weekend at the Santa Clara Supercross—despite the fact that neither any Kawasaki representative nor Millsaps were willing to speak on the record about the incident—a couple journalists were able to put their heads and sources together to explain what went down between Kawasaki and Davi Millsaps:
Sources close to the situation have indicated that a member of the Monster Energy Kawasaki MX/SX racing team found something in Millsaps’ personal locker that constitutes a violation of the WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) anti-doping code, and as a results terminated Millsaps’ contract with the team.
There have been two WADA tests during the 2015 Monster Energy/AMA Supercross Championship, and Millsaps wasn’t tested either time, which means that Millsaps has not—and could not have—failed any WADA drug tests.
Some sources have indicated on a condition of anonymity that Millsaps maintains that he has/had a prescription for what was found, but other sources have indicated that couldn’t be proven.
The 27-year-old Millsaps has indicated that he’d like to find a new home in the AMA Pro pits in order to continue his largely successful racing career, which recently saw him win the 2014 Monster Energy Cup in his debut ride for the Monster Energy Kawasaki team, as well as finish second overall in the 2012 and 2013 450cc Supercross Championships.
Unfortunately, we don’t know if this is where this story ends, as WADA and USADA have a history of launching investigations that often lead to sanctions against athletes without requiring that they actually fail a drug test. This is referred to as a “non-analytical positive,” meaning that the athlete isn’t, or can’t be, found “guilty” due to direct evidence of doping (such as failing an actual drug test), but is instead determined to be guilty of doping on the basis of other facts suggesting use, which could range from written admissions of doping all the way down to testimony from people close to the situation.
Steve Cox
Why not, I contribute Dribble as much as the next member~mostly Positive dribble thou...keep my standards high...
Here it is;
If a rider is sponsored by a particular energy drink and that rider is caught drinking another brand...is that considered "Breach of Contract"?
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Some of the weirdest non-journalism and WTF PR ever.
Dude lit it up two years which nobody expected.
http://www.cyclenews.com/690/32840/Racing-Article/Supercross--Davi-Mill…
"Wow...I cannot believe that's what it was! Sorry cannot give any details...WOW!"
Pit Row
Dont try and restart that, your post might get deleted lol.
There have been a lot of hints bros.
https://www.facebook.com/chad.sanner.3/posts/10200659201758602
http://stgmx.com/why-davi-millsaps-was-fired/
Think about it. Your the manager and you happen to see so questionable pills in your riders locker and he hasnt said anything about it to you. If he were to get caught, he's sidelined and you have a huge PR nightmare that is even worse since it would be the second big rider to get busted in the sport. especially if he isnt able to furnish proof right away.
let's see some proper reporting/journalism.
this kind of garbage kills your credibility.
you owe the MX/SX community more than what you're giving us.
Post a reply to: What was found in Davi's locker? (Updated)