Posts
8758
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI
US
Edited Date/Time
12/6/2014 12:48am
Not crashing is obvioiusly better but in the event you're going to take a soil sample what is your preference? I've experienced both and in my experience I have gotten hurt just as bad if not worse when crashing at lower speeds. I have stepped off at speed and had a chance to scrub off some energy before coming to stop but in a low speed crash it is usually WHAM!
What's your take?
What's your take?
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
son on yz85 crashes happen like this.
slow speed = at least a set of handlebars and him being stuck under the bike for a few seconds.
High speed = bike fliping end over end, nothing getting damaged and body and bike far apart from each other.
and on the body well any crash is worthy of a ambulance ride and a cast to him lol.
High speed=shoulder/collarbone
I've just had a revelation. I'm going with high-speed.
I gotta say though...."most " of my bad injuries came at high speeds though. The lower speed crashes seem to target one specific area ( like where your body hits the ground )....at high speed....you do a lot of tumbling and hit multiple areas, multiple times , over and over and over.
Pit Row
https://youtu.be/-tUtaP83Dos
Was standing right there when that happened, thought he was dead. Scariest thing I've ever seen. Video doesn't make this seem as horrific as it actually was. He was hauling ass.
The 1990 crash at Carlsbad (actually had more than one there) on my CR500 where I fractured my pelvis was a high speed get off. It actually lasted long enough that I had time to think "this is NOT good!" while doing a reverse wheelie crossed up in third gear.
I was right but didn't realize this crash would haunt me to this day with hip issues. Man dirt bikes are fun. LOL
Post a reply to: Are high speed or low speed crashes worse?