Wanna buy a house cheap?

kaw rider9
Posts
4163
Joined
12/4/2007
Location
East Peoria, IL, USA
5/14/2008 5:33pm
Scotty wrote:
Exactly! The Banks are as much or even more to blame then the consumers. They relaxed their guidelines in order to get people into these houses...
Exactly! The Banks are as much or even more to blame then the consumers. They relaxed their guidelines in order to get people into these houses. Now their paying the price. People were so desperate to get into a house because of the escalating prices, they would take any loan they could get. The Banks did this to themselves. And quite honestly, I think the house flipping market is gonna be even bigger than before. All of these houses that people just dumped and have been sitting neglected for a couple of years, are going to be prime houses to buy up. I have two of them on my street right now. They've been sitting empty for two years, and these are brand new houses!
kaw rider9 wrote:
WOW!!!!! The banks are to blame for people over spending????? Yea, The bank said they would loan you the money for your house, BUT YOU HAVE...
WOW!!!!! The banks are to blame for people over spending????? Yea, The bank said they would loan you the money for your house, BUT YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR IT!! No matter what the bank(Or anyone else) say's, YOU STILL HAVE TO PAY FOR IT...
You say people were "So desperate to get into a house because of escalating prices) is a joke!!! If you can't afford a house payment-----Ya can't!!! End of story!!
Credit card debt is out of control.. Guess who is the problem..... The guy who has the credit card or the guy charging all the intrest???
I bought a house.. I read what my payment's would be...I pay them(On time!)...
I also understand how my loan work's, I read the fine print before I signed anything!!
If I fail to make the payments on my house and it get's taking away, I'll know it was my fault for not doing what I had to do to keep my house!!! Trust me, that will not happen!! Instead of bitching, I'll go make some more money, and pay my bills!!!!
Scotty wrote:
You're and idiot.. obviously, you have no clue what really went on with the mortgage industry over the past 5-6 years. Do you think everybody who...
You're and idiot.. obviously, you have no clue what really went on with the mortgage industry over the past 5-6 years. Do you think everybody who bought a house new EXACTLY what kind of loan they were getting into? Or is there a possibility that many of the unscrupulous lenders out there pulled the wool over their eyes? Banks not requiring proof of income before lending, etc. Now their paying for it.
You sir, are a fucking idiot!!!! I do have a clue how the mortgage industry has worked over the last SEVERAL years!!!!!!
You ask," Do you think everyone knew EXACTALLY what kind of loan they were getting in to"!!!!
HELLO, If you don't know what you're getting into, You're a moron!!!!
Ya buy a house ya got to pay for it!!!!!!!
Yea, Bad lenders.... They gave you money you can't pay back!!!! Fucking lenders...
You can't pay back what you borrowed so you bitch about the bank!!!!! Priceless!!!

Don't pay your bills, It help's me out alot!!!!!!

I buy peoples crap for pennies on the dollar and sell it for a good profit!!! Damn them banks and GWB!!!!!!!!! People can't pay their bills and I make a profit off their misfortunes!!!......I love stupid people!!!!!!
volcati
Posts
1182
Joined
12/16/2006
Location
Dam Mam, QA
5/14/2008 5:35pm
kaw rider9 wrote:
WOW!!!!! The banks are to blame for people over spending????? Yea, The bank said they would loan you the money for your house, BUT YOU HAVE...
WOW!!!!! The banks are to blame for people over spending????? Yea, The bank said they would loan you the money for your house, BUT YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR IT!! No matter what the bank(Or anyone else) say's, YOU STILL HAVE TO PAY FOR IT...
You say people were "So desperate to get into a house because of escalating prices) is a joke!!! If you can't afford a house payment-----Ya can't!!! End of story!!
Credit card debt is out of control.. Guess who is the problem..... The guy who has the credit card or the guy charging all the intrest???
I bought a house.. I read what my payment's would be...I pay them(On time!)...
I also understand how my loan work's, I read the fine print before I signed anything!!
If I fail to make the payments on my house and it get's taking away, I'll know it was my fault for not doing what I had to do to keep my house!!! Trust me, that will not happen!! Instead of bitching, I'll go make some more money, and pay my bills!!!!
Scotty wrote:
You're and idiot.. obviously, you have no clue what really went on with the mortgage industry over the past 5-6 years. Do you think everybody who...
You're and idiot.. obviously, you have no clue what really went on with the mortgage industry over the past 5-6 years. Do you think everybody who bought a house new EXACTLY what kind of loan they were getting into? Or is there a possibility that many of the unscrupulous lenders out there pulled the wool over their eyes? Banks not requiring proof of income before lending, etc. Now their paying for it.
kaw rider9 wrote:
You sir, are a fucking idiot!!!! I do have a clue how the mortgage industry has worked over the last SEVERAL years!!!!!! You ask," Do you...
You sir, are a fucking idiot!!!! I do have a clue how the mortgage industry has worked over the last SEVERAL years!!!!!!
You ask," Do you think everyone knew EXACTALLY what kind of loan they were getting in to"!!!!
HELLO, If you don't know what you're getting into, You're a moron!!!!
Ya buy a house ya got to pay for it!!!!!!!
Yea, Bad lenders.... They gave you money you can't pay back!!!! Fucking lenders...
You can't pay back what you borrowed so you bitch about the bank!!!!! Priceless!!!

Don't pay your bills, It help's me out alot!!!!!!

I buy peoples crap for pennies on the dollar and sell it for a good profit!!! Damn them banks and GWB!!!!!!!!! People can't pay their bills and I make a profit off their misfortunes!!!......I love stupid people!!!!!!
STFU idiot.

We'll make it the regulars job to run your ass off this site if you keep fucking with one of the nicest original members on Motodrive...I will at least.


kaw rider9
Posts
4163
Joined
12/4/2007
Location
East Peoria, IL, USA
5/14/2008 5:39pm
volcati wrote:
STFU idiot. We'll make it the regulars job to run your ass off this site if you keep fucking with one of the nicest original members...
STFU idiot.

We'll make it the regulars job to run your ass off this site if you keep fucking with one of the nicest original members on Motodrive...I will at least.


Bring it fool!!!!!
volcati
Posts
1182
Joined
12/16/2006
Location
Dam Mam, QA
5/14/2008 6:08pm
Ok. It will be when you least expect it. So just sit there and drink your Bud.

BTW--Sweet pic of you on the KX. Like you how you timed the rev with the photo.

The Shop

5/14/2008 6:28pm
volcati wrote:
You know...that's very easy for you to say, Scott. But until you walk in someone's shoes who has 1-3 kids, two people already working, and a...
You know...that's very easy for you to say, Scott.

But until you walk in someone's shoes who has 1-3 kids, two people already working, and a mortgage that is draining the fun out of life...you best STFU.

You know nothing about real life experience or what it means to a family to lose their house they probably were VERY proud to own. I told my cousin this just the other day when he said this. I also told him to STFU and quit acting like he could even comment on the situation while he's worried about SAT scores.
Volc I gotta call BS on your reply. The major reason for foreclosers is people over bought on a variable loan plain and simple. People wanted more then they could afford. Now our Government is rewarding failure, pretty friggen typical.

They Punish successfull people by taxing the shit out of them but rewards people who are to stupid to know better.
5/14/2008 6:29pm Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 6:58pm
Looks like this thread needs more Gwen.

Gwen Steffani
volcati
Posts
1182
Joined
12/16/2006
Location
Dam Mam, QA
5/14/2008 6:39pm
volcati wrote:
You know...that's very easy for you to say, Scott. But until you walk in someone's shoes who has 1-3 kids, two people already working, and a...
You know...that's very easy for you to say, Scott.

But until you walk in someone's shoes who has 1-3 kids, two people already working, and a mortgage that is draining the fun out of life...you best STFU.

You know nothing about real life experience or what it means to a family to lose their house they probably were VERY proud to own. I told my cousin this just the other day when he said this. I also told him to STFU and quit acting like he could even comment on the situation while he's worried about SAT scores.
UpTiTe wrote:
Volc I gotta call BS on your reply. The major reason for foreclosers is people over bought on a variable loan plain and simple. People wanted...
Volc I gotta call BS on your reply. The major reason for foreclosers is people over bought on a variable loan plain and simple. People wanted more then they could afford. Now our Government is rewarding failure, pretty friggen typical.

They Punish successfull people by taxing the shit out of them but rewards people who are to stupid to know better.
I wish it was that simple. This has been debated plenty on here...epecially when the govt allowed JP Morgan to buy Bear Stearns at 2 bucks a share.

I really don't have the fortitude to go back and debate this. So we win by default! :-)

txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX, USA
5/14/2008 6:56pm
There's fault on both sides. On the front end, lenders in a hurry to create a loan that could be sold or securitized such that they...
There's fault on both sides.

On the front end, lenders in a hurry to create a loan that could be sold or securitized such that they turned a blind eye to the borrowers limitations. On the back end, early on the lenders didn't react to this as a broad problem rather than routine circumstantial individual defaults. They evaluated this, and the value of workouts, as if they were taking a house back, not thousands and thousands of houses. Banks don't make money owning property that continues to diminish in value. IMO, they would have been better off renegotiating those loans that were going to or did adjust beyond the borrowers means to keep the owner in the property paying something. They would have lost less and not contributed to declining values that were compounding the problem.
I agree to an extent, but how many of those loans could really be re-negotiated? And why would a borrower do that?

They were/are upside down on the loans. Refinance for 110% or more of the value of the house? Not a good bet.

It's unfortunate, but part of the problem.
Mr_ Money
Posts
105
Joined
4/30/2008
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
5/14/2008 7:00pm Edited Date/Time 5/14/2008 7:01pm
Mr_ Money wrote:
Already turning a corner, Las Vegas is improving, National forecloses are down %5 pre FC down %7.5

http://www.lvrj.com/business/18887509.html
volcati wrote:
Genius... Nevada is still No. 1 for mortgage failure, based on April stats, in a new report from RealtyTrac. The online foreclosure site noted: "Despite a...
Genius...

Nevada is still No. 1 for mortgage failure, based on April stats, in a new report from RealtyTrac.

The online foreclosure site noted:

"Despite a 5 percent month-over-month decrease in foreclosure activity in April, Nevada continued to document the nation's highest state foreclosure rate. One in every 146 Nevada households received a foreclosure filing in April, 3.6 times the national average, and the state's foreclosure activity was up 95 percent from April 2007."
If that weren't enough, Nevada has jumped from 37th place in 2004 for mortgage fraud to 2nd in 2007, according to another new report. (Florida rated No. 1.)

This report was done by the Mortgage Asset Research Institute. (See a chart below for Nevada's increase over the years; click to enlarge it.)

It was calculated based on information sent to the Mortgage Industry Data Exchange, which is endorsed by the Mortgage Bankers Association. I'm not an expert but that seems like a pretty legitimate source.

Based on the data submitted from lenders and various agencies, Nevada got a "mortgage fraud index" rating of 204. Basically, this means that Nevada is seeing twice the rate of mortgage fraud that one would expect to see based on the number of loans.

To explain this a bit further: If the rating had been 100, that would mean that Nevada was having exactly the rate of fraud one would expect based on the number of loans. So Nevada has more than twice the fraud expected. By contrast, the state rated 10th worst for mortgage fraud (Minnesota) had a mortgage fraud index rating of 90, meaning it had 10 percent fewer fraud cases than one would expect based on the number of loans. Thus Nevada really is pretty bad.

The FBI put out a report today that mortgage fraud is on the rise everywhere: "Although there is no central way to track the total extent of the problem, we received 46,717 Suspicious Activity Reports related to mortgage fraud last year -- compared to 35,617 in 2006 and just 6,936 in 2003. Only seven percent of these reports documented an exact dollar amount in terms of losses, but even so, the total loss from this seven percent was $813 million. Our caseload has also escalated. By the end of fiscal year 2007, we were handling just over 1,200 mortgage fraud investigations -- a 47 percent increase from 2006 and a whopping 176 percent increase from 2003."

The FBI ranked Nevada at 14th for mortgage fraud states for mortgage fraud, based on reporting from a number of different places.

Its down Nationwide like i said, Did i say anything against anything in that copy and paste, No, Mad copy-paste skills there.

Mr_ Money
Posts
105
Joined
4/30/2008
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
5/14/2008 7:37pm Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 6:58pm
It went from 1.5 in a 1000 to 3 in a 1000, If it was 100 in a 1000 then its doom, I was talking to a young guy during the 2001-02 depression, he watched the doom on the news and said he was shocked that people came into his store like they had in 1998.


Most of this stuff gets blown out of proportion.


Volcati bait

Nevada has desert


Now he will copy and paste a 1000 word story on Nevada mountains after he says some lame put down as if its fact..
kaw rider9
Posts
4163
Joined
12/4/2007
Location
East Peoria, IL, USA
5/14/2008 8:01pm
volcati wrote:
Ok. It will be when you least expect it. So just sit there and drink your Bud. BTW--Sweet pic of you on the KX. Like you...
Ok. It will be when you least expect it. So just sit there and drink your Bud.

BTW--Sweet pic of you on the KX. Like you how you timed the rev with the photo.
Volcati, You're acting like a child.

Go back and read my posts from the begining!!!!!!

People spend more than they can pay!!!....

If you can't afford something, DON'T BUY IT!!!!!!!

To say you'll get me" when I least expect it" is funny stuff!!!!!

What the hell does "Drink my Bud mean"???? I can drink a beer and have a polite conversation with you... Are you willing???

It is a sweet pic, I may look like a goon but at least I ride!!! I did not time anything for the pic, It is what it is!!!
Mr_ Money
Posts
105
Joined
4/30/2008
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
5/14/2008 8:11pm
Volcati seems pissed in this thread, I wonder if his house was repoed.

Things like
It will be when you least expect it.
volcati
Posts
1182
Joined
12/16/2006
Location
Dam Mam, QA
5/14/2008 8:30pm
That's great. Seriously.

But your responsibilities are the norm for a kid your age. Relative to rent.

But to generalize people losing their homes because they don't want to work hard...is far fetched. I know plenty of friends who have great jobs, great mortgages and they're even having to cutback due to gas and food rising exponentially.

For example I was talking with my best friend about his finances--he's fucked.

1. Car payments--owes around 40K in car debt
2. Owns a house in Laguna Hills and it's upside down even with renters
3. Owns a home in Santa Barbara (a shack) that him and his wife are paying a mortgage on. It was their rental for investment purposes
4. Drives to Calabasa every day for work. (Nationwide of all places) and spends $450 month on gas.
5. Has over $150K in student loans.
6.2 Kids
7. And everything other normal shit--medical, dental, car, home owners, daycare, etc..

Their monthly bills are around 9500.

It's a lot of people like this that are caught in the crunch. They never once took an 2 yr ARM. Getting an extra job at night won't even help them. When your an exempt employee you don't get overtime...so that's out of the question. So...they sit and hope things will turn around for the better. In the meantime...I might be a partial owner of home in Laguna because I feel their crunch.

So...you caught me at the wrong time...I might of taken your comments out of context due to this being on my mind and trying to help a friend.

Anyway, I'm done with this subject and will say...every situation is different. And yes...some people did abandon their homes...but the other 50% I believe are still hoping for a turn.








volcati
Posts
1182
Joined
12/16/2006
Location
Dam Mam, QA
5/14/2008 8:33pm
Mr_ Money wrote:
Volcati seems pissed in this thread, I wonder if his house was repoed.

Things like
It will be when you least expect it.
Tell me a good stock tip Mr Money? I need help.
noteethleroy
Posts
108
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Corning, CA, USA
5/14/2008 8:44pm
Some of the price drops around here have been crazy, I can see how paying on your house that you bought for 389,000 would grate on you when you know it's only worth 279,000 now, doesn't mean you should walk, but I understand the urge.
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13361
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
5/14/2008 9:02pm
The people who really screwed themselves were not the ones who thought they had a shot at a house and bought their first one on a teaser rate to get in.

The ones who screwed themselves were the people who had good loans and equity and started using ARMS and teasers to pull equity out to buy cars and boats and other toys and blew their debt up thinking they'd be able to perpetually roll those loans over before they adjusted as their property value went up. There's more that a few folks that lost what they had and what they got doing that.

But the big banks and investors who securitized and traded all of that made the same bet.
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13361
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
5/14/2008 9:05pm
This a pretty good book, and a good read.



Scotty
Posts
4139
Joined
3/21/2008
Location
USA
5/14/2008 9:11pm
There's fault on both sides. On the front end, lenders in a hurry to create a loan that could be sold or securitized such that they...
There's fault on both sides.

On the front end, lenders in a hurry to create a loan that could be sold or securitized such that they turned a blind eye to the borrowers limitations. On the back end, early on the lenders didn't react to this as a broad problem rather than routine circumstantial individual defaults. They evaluated this, and the value of workouts, as if they were taking a house back, not thousands and thousands of houses. Banks don't make money owning property that continues to diminish in value. IMO, they would have been better off renegotiating those loans that were going to or did adjust beyond the borrowers means to keep the owner in the property paying something. They would have lost less and not contributed to declining values that were compounding the problem.
Thanks for saying what i wanted to FTE.. Sometimes its hard to type into words what you really mean to say over a computer.. I agree with you, there is fault on both sides, but I think the Banks take most of it. My best friend WAS a mortgage broker.. He made a TON of money off of fools like many of us, who didn't grasp exactly what they were getting into. All people see in their eyes is the fact that housing prices were skyrocketing, and they need to get in a house asap. But wait, I dont make enough money to qualify. Well no biggie, my mortgage guy will fudge the #'s and ill get in.. I know its not a rational way of thinking, but people tend to get themselves into situations without throughly thinking it all the way through. They should be able to trust these so called professionals to help them get into a loan that will work. I truly feel bad for these folks who lost basically everything. One of them was my next door neighbor.
huck
Posts
17050
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Mountain Home, AR, USA
5/15/2008 7:08am
volcati wrote:
That's great. Seriously. But your responsibilities are the norm for a kid your age. Relative to rent. But to generalize people losing their homes because they...
That's great. Seriously.

But your responsibilities are the norm for a kid your age. Relative to rent.

But to generalize people losing their homes because they don't want to work hard...is far fetched. I know plenty of friends who have great jobs, great mortgages and they're even having to cutback due to gas and food rising exponentially.

For example I was talking with my best friend about his finances--he's fucked.

1. Car payments--owes around 40K in car debt
2. Owns a house in Laguna Hills and it's upside down even with renters
3. Owns a home in Santa Barbara (a shack) that him and his wife are paying a mortgage on. It was their rental for investment purposes
4. Drives to Calabasa every day for work. (Nationwide of all places) and spends $450 month on gas.
5. Has over $150K in student loans.
6.2 Kids
7. And everything other normal shit--medical, dental, car, home owners, daycare, etc..

Their monthly bills are around 9500.

It's a lot of people like this that are caught in the crunch. They never once took an 2 yr ARM. Getting an extra job at night won't even help them. When your an exempt employee you don't get overtime...so that's out of the question. So...they sit and hope things will turn around for the better. In the meantime...I might be a partial owner of home in Laguna because I feel their crunch.

So...you caught me at the wrong time...I might of taken your comments out of context due to this being on my mind and trying to help a friend.

Anyway, I'm done with this subject and will say...every situation is different. And yes...some people did abandon their homes...but the other 50% I believe are still hoping for a turn.








Sounds like your friend over extended himself...nobody's fault but his own...

Tiki
Posts
10687
Joined
8/1/2006
Location
Corona, CA, USA
Fantasy
5/15/2008 7:23am
How many users here are wealthy enough to get thoses free subscriptions to crap magazines wealthy living, etc. How many get telemarketing calls from Brokers looking to invest money?

This isnt me by any means. I guess what I am saying is theres a lot of advice going out, most MX people I know are more in Debt then actual wealth. We can all see the future. Housing is screwed and its all credit related. Eliminating the gold standard may not have been such a good idea.
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
5/15/2008 7:28am
The problem's on both sides of the fence. The masses aren't that bright, and the banks did some really dumb things as well. This situation just shows how stupid people can be. Heck, I'm no genius myself. I feel lucky I didn't get sucked into this. Ok, I actually looked at doing one of those interest free loans, but I was just barely smart enough to run the numbers, and in the long run they looked terrible. I'm sure I could've put myself into a $500K house, and now be in big trouble.
BMSOB
Posts
1191
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
PN
5/15/2008 7:41am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 6:58pm
Check this out. This was back in 2004 but it was already in the works in 2002. It would seem that what happened in the housing market was by design & the fact that there was no oversight of the banking & finance side of the market looks like a license to steal to me. Couple that with the bailout of the banks who got too greedy & the Bear Stearns deal & you have what we laughingly call a "free market economy". Yes a lot of people shouldn't have done what they did but when you have the government encouraging you to spend spend spend & assist you in doing so & the bankers having virtually no risk it all starts to smell pretty bad. Looks like the government got what they wanted. Love that Bush.




For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
September 2, 2004

Increasing Affordable Housing and Expanding Homeownership




We live in a time of change, and our dynamic economy can create great opportunities for America's families to realize their dreams. During this time of change, President Bush believes that government should help families to have the security, dignity, and independence that comes with owning their piece of the American dream.

President Bush has a bold agenda for promoting an ownership society: giving young people the option of voluntary personal accounts under Social Security to give them more control over their retirement savings; Health Savings Accounts to give individuals expanded access and choice in health care; lower taxes and less burdensome regulations on entrepreneurs; and policies to eliminate barriers to homeownership.

President Bush supports homeownership, which gives Americans a greater stake in their communities. The President has been leading a three-part strategy for increasing homeownership by:

Supporting low-income families who are saving for a downpayment, and ensuring that good financing options are available;
Ensuring that the homebuying process is fair to consumers and that consumers understand their options; and
Creating a larger supply of affordable housing units available for ownership.
The President's New Proposals for Affordable Housing and Increased Homeownership

To help more Americans achieve the American dream of owning their own home, President Bush set a new public-private goal of increasing the supply of affordable housing by seven million over the next 10 years. To meet this goal, the President is calling for passage of his Homeownership Tax Credit and encouraging communities to reduce regulatory barriers through the Department of Housing and Urban Development's America's Affordable Communities Initiative and the President's new Opportunity Zones initiative.

The Homeownership Tax Credit. Under the President's plan, homebuilders that build affordable homes for middle-income purchases will receive a tax credit. Federal government estimates indicate that this Homeownership Tax Credit will result in an additional 40-50,000 affordable single-family homes annually. The Homeownership Tax Credit would allow state housing finance agencies to award tax credits to single-family developments located in a census tract with median income equal to 80 percent or less of area median income. The credits could not exceed 50 percent of the cost of constructing a new home or rehabilitating an existing property. The program would be limited to homebuyers who earn no more than 80 percent of area median income. Each state would have a homeownership credit ceiling adjusted for inflation each year and equal to the greater of 1.75 times the state population or $2 million.
Regulatory Reform. Studies have shown that regulatory barriers can add to the costs of a home by 20 to 35 percent. Removing these barriers would reduce development costs and enable millions of American families to buy or rent suitable housing that they otherwise could not afford. Removing regulatory barriers that add to the costs of a home are integral to meeting housing needs for middle-income individuals such as teachers, firefighters, police officers, nurses, service sector employees, and others.
The America's Affordable Communities Initiative was launched by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to focus more attention on the need for regulatory reform. The initiative is an aggressive effort to help communities across America identify and overcome regulatory barriers to affordable housing.
HUD has identified regulations contributing to higher housing costs and production delays, including: out-of-date building codes; duplicative or time-consuming design review or approval processes; burdensome rehabilitation codes; restrictive or exclusionary zoning ordinances; unnecessary or excessive fees or taxes; extreme environmental restrictions; and excessive or "gold-plated" land development standards.
While many of these regulations were well-intentioned and even useful in their early implementation, many have become outdated and cause unintended harm to local communities. By helping local communities remove these regulatory barriers, HUD seeks to open doors for millions of American families who want to buy or rent an affordable home in the community of their choice.
The Federal government will not become a super zoning authority. In fact, it is just the opposite. The President wants state and local governments to look at their laws and make changes that are best suited for their particular jurisdiction, just as the Federal government will lead by example by examining its own regulations.
Challenging the Private Sector. The President is calling upon the housing industry, including the, Federal Home Loan Banks, the homebuilders, and the mortgage and finance industry to join with Federal, State, and local governments to help America meet the goal of increasing the supply of affordable housing.
Increasing the Supply of Affordable Housing Units Available for Ownership

The lack of affordable housing can be an insurmountable barrier for low- and moderate-income homebuyers in many parts of the country, especially along the coasts. Traditionally, affordable housing efforts have focused on the short-term goal of increasing the affordability and number of available rental units, and have not focused on ownership. As part of the President's plan to build an ownership society, he has focused on encouraging homeownership, particularly among minorities and low-income families. In 2003, the number of homeowners increased by 1.7 million as the number of renters declined in the United States by over one million families.

The President's Homeownership Accomplishments

Congress and the President have worked together to accomplish important elements of his strategy - providing downpayment support for low-income families and good financing options for rural buyers. Under President Bush's leadership, overall U.S. homeownership in the second quarter of 2004 reached an all-time high of 69.2 percent. Single-family housing affordability is at its highest level in 30 years, and minority homeownership set a new record-high of 51 percent in the second quarter.

The President has called on Congress to work with him on additional steps to promote homeownership in America. He has set bold goals for homeownership, including his challenge to the Nation to create 5.5 million new minority homeowners by the end of the decade - and he has now set an additional goal of 7 million new affordable homes.

Downpayment Assistance and Homebuying Education:
American Dream Downpayment Initiative. To help low-income families overcome the hurdle of a downpayment, the President proposed the American Dream Downpayment Initiative in June 2002 and signed the American Dream Downpayment Act into law on December 16, 2003. In June 2004, HUD announced $160 million in funding for this initiative to 400 local and state governments across the country to assist low-income families with down payment funds. The President requested $200 million for the American Dream Downpayment Initiative in his FY 2005 budget, which will assist an estimated 40,000 families.
Zero-Downpayment Initiative. In his FY 2005 budget, the President proposed the Zero-Downpayment Initiative. Preliminary projections indicate this Initiative would help about 150,000 homebuyers in the first year alone. This proposal would eliminate the statutory requirement of a minimum three percent down payment for FHA-insured single-family mortgages for first-time homebuyers.
Housing Counseling and Homebuying Education. Since 2001, President Bush has doubled the funding for housing counseling for families. These HUD housing counseling grants help take the uncertainty out of home buying for thousands of Americans, empowering them to avoid predatory lending, make more informed home purchases, and understand the lending process more clearly. The President has also called for an increase in funding for comprehensive housing counseling and education, including pre-purchase and default services, and renter counseling to potential homeowners and tenants. The President's FY 2005 budget request for these important programs is $45 million, more than doubling the $20 million level in FY 2001.
America's Homeownership Challenge. In June 2002, President Bush issued America's Homeownership Challenge to the real estate and mortgage finance industries - to encourage them to join the effort to close the gap that exists between the homeownership rates of minorities and non-minorities. Due to the President's leadership, more than 2 dozen companies have made commitments to increase minority homeownership, including pledges to finance more than $1.1 trillion in mortgage purchases for minority homebuyers this decade.
Affordable Housing:
Tripling funding for Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program. Since 2001, the President's Budget requests have tripled funding for the Self-Help Homeownership Opportunities Program (SHOP), which provides grants for land acquisition and infrastructure improvement to nonprofit organizations, such as Habitat for Humanity, that offer homeownership opportunities to families willing to contribute their own "sweat equity." The President has requested funding for the Program in each of his budgets.
Federal Regulatory Relief. In April 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that there was no need for a proposed national Effluent Guideline Limitation for stormwater runoff from construction and development sites. EPA determined that locally tailored programs can better account for the site-specific nature of stormwater management, and that imposing a one-size-fits-all federal approach - which would have cost an estimated $4.2 billion a year - would not be the most effective way to address post-construction stormwater runoff. Estimates were that this proposal could have raised the average cost of new homes by $1,000 to over $2,000; shut out 135,000 low-income families from owning a new home; eliminated up to 18,000 jobs; shut down as many as 800 construction firms; and unduly burdened 150,000 small businesses.
volcati
Posts
1182
Joined
12/16/2006
Location
Dam Mam, QA
5/15/2008 8:33am
volcati wrote:
That's great. Seriously. But your responsibilities are the norm for a kid your age. Relative to rent. But to generalize people losing their homes because they...
That's great. Seriously.

But your responsibilities are the norm for a kid your age. Relative to rent.

But to generalize people losing their homes because they don't want to work hard...is far fetched. I know plenty of friends who have great jobs, great mortgages and they're even having to cutback due to gas and food rising exponentially.

For example I was talking with my best friend about his finances--he's fucked.

1. Car payments--owes around 40K in car debt
2. Owns a house in Laguna Hills and it's upside down even with renters
3. Owns a home in Santa Barbara (a shack) that him and his wife are paying a mortgage on. It was their rental for investment purposes
4. Drives to Calabasa every day for work. (Nationwide of all places) and spends $450 month on gas.
5. Has over $150K in student loans.
6.2 Kids
7. And everything other normal shit--medical, dental, car, home owners, daycare, etc..

Their monthly bills are around 9500.

It's a lot of people like this that are caught in the crunch. They never once took an 2 yr ARM. Getting an extra job at night won't even help them. When your an exempt employee you don't get overtime...so that's out of the question. So...they sit and hope things will turn around for the better. In the meantime...I might be a partial owner of home in Laguna because I feel their crunch.

So...you caught me at the wrong time...I might of taken your comments out of context due to this being on my mind and trying to help a friend.

Anyway, I'm done with this subject and will say...every situation is different. And yes...some people did abandon their homes...but the other 50% I believe are still hoping for a turn.








huck wrote:
Sounds like your friend over extended himself...nobody's fault but his own...

Absolutely he is over exented. But those are the risks he took. In the end he'll be fine...as long as he's not laid-off from Countrywide...which is a pretty good possibiltiy. Though he doesn't work in the load dept.

It was just a point to make that a lot of these people losing their homes are not losing them because of lack of effort.

G-man
Posts
9465
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
5/15/2008 8:57am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 6:58pm
I don't feel sorry for you're friend he is like many who bit off way more then they can chew. Anyone with 40k in car debts is not too bright imo....

Time to sell that "look at me vehicle" pay it off & drive a beater....
APLMAN
Posts
439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
East Wenatchee, WA, USA
5/15/2008 9:02am
$150K in student loans? Damn, that's hard to stomach unless you are just about done with a medical residency or something!

volcati
Posts
1182
Joined
12/16/2006
Location
Dam Mam, QA
5/15/2008 9:09am
G-man wrote:
I don't feel sorry for you're friend he is like many who bit off way more then they can chew. Anyone with 40k in car debts...
I don't feel sorry for you're friend he is like many who bit off way more then they can chew. Anyone with 40k in car debts is not too bright imo....

Time to sell that "look at me vehicle" pay it off & drive a beater....
I doubt anyone would feel sorry for him. That wasn't the point. His life was relative to what him and his wife were making. They still both have their jobs. While they took a risk to secure their future...they are now on the brink of collapse.

I agree...with the auto debt. But it's also easier said than done to just dump it. I advised him several years back to only buy a car you can afford to pay cash with at the time. I haven't financed a car in 13 years. I hate car payments.

G-man
Posts
9465
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
5/15/2008 9:14am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 6:58pm
volcati wrote:
I doubt anyone would feel sorry for him. That wasn't the point. His life was relative to what him and his wife were making. They still...
I doubt anyone would feel sorry for him. That wasn't the point. His life was relative to what him and his wife were making. They still both have their jobs. While they took a risk to secure their future...they are now on the brink of collapse.

I agree...with the auto debt. But it's also easier said than done to just dump it. I advised him several years back to only buy a car you can afford to pay cash with at the time. I haven't financed a car in 13 years. I hate car payments.

Me too, I'm still driving my 90 van that got T-boned on the way to LL's while the 99 sits in the garage. The 90 gets a little better mileage & just keeps on truckin. If I sold it I MIGHT be able to get 1800 for it even though she runs great and the A/C blows COLD. It's not worth it to me to dump it right now although I could use the extra space.

The 02 Intrepid barely gets used.

I'd like to get a street bike but having three vehicles right now is enough....
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
5/15/2008 9:17am Edited Date/Time 5/15/2008 9:26am
volcati wrote:
That's great. Seriously. But your responsibilities are the norm for a kid your age. Relative to rent. But to generalize people losing their homes because they...
That's great. Seriously.

But your responsibilities are the norm for a kid your age. Relative to rent.

But to generalize people losing their homes because they don't want to work hard...is far fetched. I know plenty of friends who have great jobs, great mortgages and they're even having to cutback due to gas and food rising exponentially.

For example I was talking with my best friend about his finances--he's fucked.

1. Car payments--owes around 40K in car debt
2. Owns a house in Laguna Hills and it's upside down even with renters
3. Owns a home in Santa Barbara (a shack) that him and his wife are paying a mortgage on. It was their rental for investment purposes
4. Drives to Calabasa every day for work. (Nationwide of all places) and spends $450 month on gas.
5. Has over $150K in student loans.
6.2 Kids
7. And everything other normal shit--medical, dental, car, home owners, daycare, etc..

Their monthly bills are around 9500.

It's a lot of people like this that are caught in the crunch. They never once took an 2 yr ARM. Getting an extra job at night won't even help them. When your an exempt employee you don't get overtime...so that's out of the question. So...they sit and hope things will turn around for the better. In the meantime...I might be a partial owner of home in Laguna because I feel their crunch.

So...you caught me at the wrong time...I might of taken your comments out of context due to this being on my mind and trying to help a friend.

Anyway, I'm done with this subject and will say...every situation is different. And yes...some people did abandon their homes...but the other 50% I believe are still hoping for a turn.








So, your buddy and his wife pull down about $175K gross annually just to make ends meet, right?
Mr_ Money
Posts
105
Joined
4/30/2008
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
5/15/2008 9:23am
Gotta have that new car even though your squeaking by on bills, If you have kids and live like that your an idiot..
volcati
Posts
1182
Joined
12/16/2006
Location
Dam Mam, QA
5/15/2008 10:08am
Mr_ Money wrote:
Gotta have that new car even though your squeaking by on bills, If you have kids and live like that your an idiot..
You should change your name to Mr. Obvious. It would fit better.

Where's my stock tip?

Post a reply to: Wanna buy a house cheap?

The Latest