Tucker gone

ToolMaker wrote:

So which stories in the last 2 weeks was he lying about? Or the last month?

TM

lappedrider wrote:

Once a man admits he has no honor, how do you trust anything he says? 

ToolMaker wrote:

So which stories in the last 2 weeks was he lying about? Or the last month?

TM

lappedrider wrote:

Once a man admits he has no honor, how do you trust anything he says? 

ToolMaker wrote:

So which stories in the last 2 weeks was he lying about? Or the last month?

TM

lappedrider wrote:

I would refer you to his own words, and hope that you realize what is in plain site.  

ToolMaker wrote:

Haven't watched your video and probably wont, because quite frankly it doesn't matter. Tucker was the golden goose for Fox. You don't kill off your golden...

Haven't watched your video and probably wont, because quite frankly it doesn't matter. Tucker was the golden goose for Fox.

You don't kill off your golden goose because of some internal opinion differences. The management has a duty to the

shareholders. How many of the irrelevant main stream media have ass hats for on air personalities? Stop the hammering!

Tucker is unique, like him or not, Tucker drives the news. He was not in step with all the other dem talking point talking heads.

He challenged the administration narrative and they did not like it. Why did they not like it? Because the had evidence that the

administration was and is always lying about everything and he called them out. There's not many personalities that drive the news.

Tucker is one. The only way the dems continue with power is to silence dissenting voices, Tucker being the biggest voice of dissent. I doubt he'll be quiet for long. However, if, which he probably is, suing Fox, if he gets right back out there it's pretty hard to claim damages.

TM

APLMAN99 wrote:

He should have been the golden goose based on ratings but….. From all reports it was difficult to monetize those ratings because the bigger, higher paying...

He should have been the golden goose based on ratings but…..

From all reports it was difficult to monetize those ratings because the bigger, higher paying advertisers were no longer willing to sponsor his act. 

3 Tres wrote:

I like how all of the "anti-establishment" and "progressive" types are cheering on a member of the media who is massively popular with the people, being...

I like how all of the "anti-establishment" and "progressive" types are cheering on a member of the media who is massively popular with the people, being taken down by advertising pressure from multi-national corporations.

 

lappedrider wrote:

Once a man admits he has no honor, how do you trust anything he says? 

ToolMaker wrote:

So which stories in the last 2 weeks was he lying about? Or the last month?

TM

lappedrider wrote:

I would refer you to his own words, and hope that you realize what is in plain site.  

ToolMaker wrote:

So which stories in the last 2 weeks was he lying about? Or the last month?

TM

lappedrider wrote:

I would refer you to his own words, and hope that you realize what is in plain site.  

ToolMaker wrote:

Why are you avoiding the question? Quite frankly I don't know the words or the context. The entire context is quite important. The context might even...

Why are you avoiding the question? Quite frankly I don't know the words or the context. The entire context is quite important. The context might even be something that's a continuation of conversation from a month before. There was prerace going on and RV2 slapped JLaw upside the head with his front wheel. If you didn't know the context, you very well point to that and say RV was a dirty rider, and stand your ground on that. Now that's "A" story but it's not "the" story" because when you know the context that JLaw was fucking with him you then realize RV was not a dirty rider. But it's still a true statement to say RV intentionally ran into JLaw. So, again, which stories in the last week did he lie about? Or even in the last month? Surely if he is the liar you make him out to be you should have examples from within the last month. I mean CNN ran with the Russia Hoax for years, and not just CNN, all of them. How hard are they pushing "insurrection"? And how long? Years. Pick a topic, any topic and chances are the it's being lied about on all the other networks. And if they don't outright lie, they cover it up like it never happened. Where's the manifesto? I hurts their narrative so they pretend it didn't happen. Worse yet, they blame the victims.

TM 

lappedrider wrote:

I would refer you to his own words, and hope that you realize what is in plain site.  

ToolMaker wrote:

Why are you avoiding the question? Quite frankly I don't know the words or the context. The entire context is quite important. The context might even...

Why are you avoiding the question? Quite frankly I don't know the words or the context. The entire context is quite important. The context might even be something that's a continuation of conversation from a month before. There was prerace going on and RV2 slapped JLaw upside the head with his front wheel. If you didn't know the context, you very well point to that and say RV was a dirty rider, and stand your ground on that. Now that's "A" story but it's not "the" story" because when you know the context that JLaw was fucking with him you then realize RV was not a dirty rider. But it's still a true statement to say RV intentionally ran into JLaw. So, again, which stories in the last week did he lie about? Or even in the last month? Surely if he is the liar you make him out to be you should have examples from within the last month. I mean CNN ran with the Russia Hoax for years, and not just CNN, all of them. How hard are they pushing "insurrection"? And how long? Years. Pick a topic, any topic and chances are the it's being lied about on all the other networks. And if they don't outright lie, they cover it up like it never happened. Where's the manifesto? I hurts their narrative so they pretend it didn't happen. Worse yet, they blame the victims.

TM 

eddie wrote:

You seem to be arguing that lies older than two weeks , don’t count as lies ? I don’t understand what you are getting at here...

You seem to be arguing that lies older than two weeks , don’t count as lies ? I don’t understand what you are getting at here lol . I can’t prove that Trump hasn’t lied in the past two weeks … ergo he isn’t a liar ? WTF LOL . The RV story was a poor attempt at deflection . 

ToolMaker wrote:

Why are you avoiding the question? Quite frankly I don't know the words or the context. The entire context is quite important. The context might even...

Why are you avoiding the question? Quite frankly I don't know the words or the context. The entire context is quite important. The context might even be something that's a continuation of conversation from a month before. There was prerace going on and RV2 slapped JLaw upside the head with his front wheel. If you didn't know the context, you very well point to that and say RV was a dirty rider, and stand your ground on that. Now that's "A" story but it's not "the" story" because when you know the context that JLaw was fucking with him you then realize RV was not a dirty rider. But it's still a true statement to say RV intentionally ran into JLaw. So, again, which stories in the last week did he lie about? Or even in the last month? Surely if he is the liar you make him out to be you should have examples from within the last month. I mean CNN ran with the Russia Hoax for years, and not just CNN, all of them. How hard are they pushing "insurrection"? And how long? Years. Pick a topic, any topic and chances are the it's being lied about on all the other networks. And if they don't outright lie, they cover it up like it never happened. Where's the manifesto? I hurts their narrative so they pretend it didn't happen. Worse yet, they blame the victims.

TM 

eddie wrote:

You seem to be arguing that lies older than two weeks , don’t count as lies ? I don’t understand what you are getting at here...

You seem to be arguing that lies older than two weeks , don’t count as lies ? I don’t understand what you are getting at here lol . I can’t prove that Trump hasn’t lied in the past two weeks … ergo he isn’t a liar ? WTF LOL . The RV story was a poor attempt at deflection . 

ToolMaker wrote:

No deflection at all. It was an example of using an isolated incident to create a false narrative. A deflection is something that takes the conversation...

No deflection at all. It was an example of using an isolated incident to create a false narrative. A deflection is something that takes the conversation away from the topic. I didn't change the topic. The topic is you're painting Tucker as someone who lies all the time. Well, give some examples. How far do you have to go back? Come on, disagreements with the higher ups? There's not a person in here or in this country that hasn't had a disagreement with their employer at some point in time. For most people it's a daily occurrence.

TM

eddie wrote:

You seem to be arguing that lies older than two weeks , don’t count as lies ? I don’t understand what you are getting at here...

You seem to be arguing that lies older than two weeks , don’t count as lies ? I don’t understand what you are getting at here lol . I can’t prove that Trump hasn’t lied in the past two weeks … ergo he isn’t a liar ? WTF LOL . The RV story was a poor attempt at deflection . 

ToolMaker wrote:

No deflection at all. It was an example of using an isolated incident to create a false narrative. A deflection is something that takes the conversation...

No deflection at all. It was an example of using an isolated incident to create a false narrative. A deflection is something that takes the conversation away from the topic. I didn't change the topic. The topic is you're painting Tucker as someone who lies all the time. Well, give some examples. How far do you have to go back? Come on, disagreements with the higher ups? There's not a person in here or in this country that hasn't had a disagreement with their employer at some point in time. For most people it's a daily occurrence.

TM

eddie wrote:

You are really hung up on this two week time frame . Why is that ? Seems that we both agree that Tucker is a proven...

You are really hung up on this two week time frame . Why is that ? Seems that we both agree that Tucker is a proven liar , we just disagree on the frequency of his lies . 

eddie wrote:

You seem to be arguing that lies older than two weeks , don’t count as lies ? I don’t understand what you are getting at here...

You seem to be arguing that lies older than two weeks , don’t count as lies ? I don’t understand what you are getting at here lol . I can’t prove that Trump hasn’t lied in the past two weeks … ergo he isn’t a liar ? WTF LOL . The RV story was a poor attempt at deflection . 

ToolMaker wrote:

No deflection at all. It was an example of using an isolated incident to create a false narrative. A deflection is something that takes the conversation...

No deflection at all. It was an example of using an isolated incident to create a false narrative. A deflection is something that takes the conversation away from the topic. I didn't change the topic. The topic is you're painting Tucker as someone who lies all the time. Well, give some examples. How far do you have to go back? Come on, disagreements with the higher ups? There's not a person in here or in this country that hasn't had a disagreement with their employer at some point in time. For most people it's a daily occurrence.

TM

eddie wrote:

You are really hung up on this two week time frame . Why is that ? Seems that we both agree that Tucker is a proven...

You are really hung up on this two week time frame . Why is that ? Seems that we both agree that Tucker is a proven liar , we just disagree on the frequency of his lies . 

ToolMaker wrote:

No deflection at all. It was an example of using an isolated incident to create a false narrative. A deflection is something that takes the conversation...

No deflection at all. It was an example of using an isolated incident to create a false narrative. A deflection is something that takes the conversation away from the topic. I didn't change the topic. The topic is you're painting Tucker as someone who lies all the time. Well, give some examples. How far do you have to go back? Come on, disagreements with the higher ups? There's not a person in here or in this country that hasn't had a disagreement with their employer at some point in time. For most people it's a daily occurrence.

TM

eddie wrote:

You are really hung up on this two week time frame . Why is that ? Seems that we both agree that Tucker is a proven...

You are really hung up on this two week time frame . Why is that ? Seems that we both agree that Tucker is a proven liar , we just disagree on the frequency of his lies . 

ToolMaker wrote:

Reading compression issue? I asked how far you need to go back. I didn't conceded he's a proven liar. Where did you get that? Tell me...

Reading compression issue? I asked how far you need to go back. I didn't conceded he's a proven liar. Where did you get that? Tell me what he's currently lying about and how far back you had to go.

TM

eddie wrote:

You are really hung up on this two week time frame . Why is that ? Seems that we both agree that Tucker is a proven...

You are really hung up on this two week time frame . Why is that ? Seems that we both agree that Tucker is a proven liar , we just disagree on the frequency of his lies . 

ToolMaker wrote:

Reading compression issue? I asked how far you need to go back. I didn't conceded he's a proven liar. Where did you get that? Tell me...

Reading compression issue? I asked how far you need to go back. I didn't conceded he's a proven liar. Where did you get that? Tell me what he's currently lying about and how far back you had to go.

TM

jjavaman wrote:

 Remember when he was pushing that immigrants were going to replace white voters, then some yahoo went and shot up a Buffalo grocery store. How about...

 Remember when he was pushing that immigrants were going to replace white voters, then some yahoo went and shot up a Buffalo grocery store. How about the litter boxes in schools bullshit? How about Russia is in the right for invading Ukraine? That fucking rich prick has done more to divide your country than just about any politician other than orange blob. Yet you eat it up like it’s the gospel, bloody cultists…

 I’m just asking the question 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

ToolMaker wrote:

Reading compression issue? I asked how far you need to go back. I didn't conceded he's a proven liar. Where did you get that? Tell me...

Reading compression issue? I asked how far you need to go back. I didn't conceded he's a proven liar. Where did you get that? Tell me what he's currently lying about and how far back you had to go.

TM

jjavaman wrote:

 Remember when he was pushing that immigrants were going to replace white voters, then some yahoo went and shot up a Buffalo grocery store. How about...

 Remember when he was pushing that immigrants were going to replace white voters, then some yahoo went and shot up a Buffalo grocery store. How about the litter boxes in schools bullshit? How about Russia is in the right for invading Ukraine? That fucking rich prick has done more to divide your country than just about any politician other than orange blob. Yet you eat it up like it’s the gospel, bloody cultists…

 I’m just asking the question 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

ToolMaker wrote:

"immigrants were going to replace white voters" I have to do some research on that because my recollection was this was an oped by the NY...

"immigrants were going to replace white voters"

I have to do some research on that because my recollection was this was an oped by the NY times that started all this Replacement Theory

The litter boxes in schools? I did with your favorite liberal search engine did Tucker promote litter boxes in schools and got zilch.

The Russia thing? I don't believe he claims Russia is in the right to invade Ukraine but he also does not believe we should be doing what we are doing. We are effectively marching towards WWIII. And whether you sympathize with Ukraine (I do, see my posts where we should have stopped this in the beginning when it was easily stoppable) or not. It's a legitimate point of view that Bidens path is taking us to WWIII.

TM

TeamGreen wrote:

I’m laughing at the haters celebrating as if Carlson is somehow NOT gonna make out like a bandit in this. He was already at odds with...

I’m laughing at the haters celebrating as if Carlson is somehow NOT gonna make out like a bandit in this. He was already at odds with Fox mgmt for everything from their shitty “Fox Nation” subscriber service to their absolutely shitty on-line streaming of both FNC & Fox Nation. 

And, in regards to who has been explaining this from the on-set…Megan Kelly…she’s been making educated guess based analysis of “cause and effect/how and why” of Tucker’s situation and it looks like she’s on the money with her well informed place in all of it. 

Meanwhile, Leftist Narrative Lap-Dogs revel in their hate and, as usual, point their angry socialist adoring fingers while they continue to forget the THREE F’ING YEARS that CNN-MSNBC Cuomo-Lemon-Anderson & Rachel Maddow along with Joy Reid & ALL the lefty-liars told them RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA or that they should all get vaxxed and then the virus won’t touch them or…as of late…2 years into the administration they elected…”Everything that’s f’d up is STILL The Donald’s Fault!”.

Bwaaaaahaaaaaahaaaaaa

You can not make this shit up. 

TeamGreen wrote:

I’m laughing at the haters celebrating as if Carlson is somehow NOT gonna make out like a bandit in this. He was already at odds with...

I’m laughing at the haters celebrating as if Carlson is somehow NOT gonna make out like a bandit in this. He was already at odds with Fox mgmt for everything from their shitty “Fox Nation” subscriber service to their absolutely shitty on-line streaming of both FNC & Fox Nation. 

And, in regards to who has been explaining this from the on-set…Megan Kelly…she’s been making educated guess based analysis of “cause and effect/how and why” of Tucker’s situation and it looks like she’s on the money with her well informed place in all of it. 

Meanwhile, Leftist Narrative Lap-Dogs revel in their hate and, as usual, point their angry socialist adoring fingers while they continue to forget the THREE F’ING YEARS that CNN-MSNBC Cuomo-Lemon-Anderson & Rachel Maddow along with Joy Reid & ALL the lefty-liars told them RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA or that they should all get vaxxed and then the virus won’t touch them or…as of late…2 years into the administration they elected…”Everything that’s f’d up is STILL The Donald’s Fault!”.

Bwaaaaahaaaaaahaaaaaa

You can not make this shit up. 

Jeremy A.K. wrote:

Well said

TeamGreen wrote:

I’m laughing at the haters celebrating as if Carlson is somehow NOT gonna make out like a bandit in this. He was already at odds with...

I’m laughing at the haters celebrating as if Carlson is somehow NOT gonna make out like a bandit in this. He was already at odds with Fox mgmt for everything from their shitty “Fox Nation” subscriber service to their absolutely shitty on-line streaming of both FNC & Fox Nation. 

And, in regards to who has been explaining this from the on-set…Megan Kelly…she’s been making educated guess based analysis of “cause and effect/how and why” of Tucker’s situation and it looks like she’s on the money with her well informed place in all of it. 

Meanwhile, Leftist Narrative Lap-Dogs revel in their hate and, as usual, point their angry socialist adoring fingers while they continue to forget the THREE F’ING YEARS that CNN-MSNBC Cuomo-Lemon-Anderson & Rachel Maddow along with Joy Reid & ALL the lefty-liars told them RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA or that they should all get vaxxed and then the virus won’t touch them or…as of late…2 years into the administration they elected…”Everything that’s f’d up is STILL The Donald’s Fault!”.

Bwaaaaahaaaaaahaaaaaa

You can not make this shit up. 

Jeremy A.K. wrote:

Well said

TeamGreen wrote:

Thanks!  Now let’s see how much rent free mental real estate I get from The Minions…? They have no tangible response; so, they hide. 

Thanks! 

Now let’s see how much rent free mental real estate I get from The Minions…?

They have no tangible response; so, they hide. 

Jeremy A.K. wrote:

Well said

TeamGreen wrote:

Thanks!  Now let’s see how much rent free mental real estate I get from The Minions…? They have no tangible response; so, they hide. 

Thanks! 

Now let’s see how much rent free mental real estate I get from The Minions…?

They have no tangible response; so, they hide. 

lappedrider wrote:

Seems you can 100%, make this shit up.  

jjavaman wrote:

 Remember when he was pushing that immigrants were going to replace white voters, then some yahoo went and shot up a Buffalo grocery store. How about...

 Remember when he was pushing that immigrants were going to replace white voters, then some yahoo went and shot up a Buffalo grocery store. How about the litter boxes in schools bullshit? How about Russia is in the right for invading Ukraine? That fucking rich prick has done more to divide your country than just about any politician other than orange blob. Yet you eat it up like it’s the gospel, bloody cultists…

 I’m just asking the question 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

ToolMaker wrote:

"immigrants were going to replace white voters" I have to do some research on that because my recollection was this was an oped by the NY...

"immigrants were going to replace white voters"

I have to do some research on that because my recollection was this was an oped by the NY times that started all this Replacement Theory

The litter boxes in schools? I did with your favorite liberal search engine did Tucker promote litter boxes in schools and got zilch.

The Russia thing? I don't believe he claims Russia is in the right to invade Ukraine but he also does not believe we should be doing what we are doing. We are effectively marching towards WWIII. And whether you sympathize with Ukraine (I do, see my posts where we should have stopped this in the beginning when it was easily stoppable) or not. It's a legitimate point of view that Bidens path is taking us to WWIII.

TM

jjavaman wrote:

Sorry I forgot the big one, there was no election fraud yet he and the rest of the fake faux news kept pushing that lie…

Shiftfaced wrote:

What is Glenn Beck up to these days? How about Bill O’Reilly?   Useful idiots, discarded at will. Without Faux News, they have no wind in...

What is Glenn Beck up to these days?
How about Bill O’Reilly?

 

Useful idiots, discarded at will.

Without Faux News, they have no wind in their sails.

Shiftfaced wrote:

What is Glenn Beck up to these days? How about Bill O’Reilly?   Useful idiots, discarded at will. Without Faux News, they have no wind in...

What is Glenn Beck up to these days?
How about Bill O’Reilly?

 

Useful idiots, discarded at will.

Without Faux News, they have no wind in their sails.

TeamGreen wrote:

Thanks!  Now let’s see how much rent free mental real estate I get from The Minions…? They have no tangible response; so, they hide. 

Thanks! 

Now let’s see how much rent free mental real estate I get from The Minions…?

They have no tangible response; so, they hide. 

lappedrider wrote:

Seems you can 100%, make this shit up.  

TeamGreen wrote:

I rest my case. 

 

ToolMaker wrote:

"immigrants were going to replace white voters" I have to do some research on that because my recollection was this was an oped by the NY...

"immigrants were going to replace white voters"

I have to do some research on that because my recollection was this was an oped by the NY times that started all this Replacement Theory

The litter boxes in schools? I did with your favorite liberal search engine did Tucker promote litter boxes in schools and got zilch.

The Russia thing? I don't believe he claims Russia is in the right to invade Ukraine but he also does not believe we should be doing what we are doing. We are effectively marching towards WWIII. And whether you sympathize with Ukraine (I do, see my posts where we should have stopped this in the beginning when it was easily stoppable) or not. It's a legitimate point of view that Bidens path is taking us to WWIII.

TM

jjavaman wrote:

Sorry I forgot the big one, there was no election fraud yet he and the rest of the fake faux news kept pushing that lie…

ToolMaker wrote:

Apparently you didn't see the actual video of people pulling ballots out of suitcases that were hidden under the tables and running them through the counting...

Apparently you didn't see the actual video of people pulling ballots out of suitcases that were hidden

under the tables and running them through the counting machines. So when you say there was

"no election fraud" that makes you the liar not Tucker. 

Just sayin

jjavaman wrote:

Sorry, I have to leave this thread. I didn’t realize I was talking to a full blown Q guy. Enjoy your delusional life where a twice...

Sorry, I have to leave this thread. I didn’t realize I was talking to a full blown Q guy. Enjoy your delusional life where a twice impeached one term criminal can make shit up and you cultists believe it. I mean it’s not like EVERY case of alleged voter fraud has been laughed out of court or anything. It’s not like your cultist tv station had to pay out almost $800 million because they were pushing a lie about voter fraud, but by all means keep following “your guy”. 
 What’s the latest bullshit that the fat orange loser is spreading, they want to abort children on their way out of the birth canal or in some cases kill the new born child. Fucking stable genius there.

jjavaman wrote:

Sorry I forgot the big one, there was no election fraud yet he and the rest of the fake faux news kept pushing that lie…

ToolMaker wrote:

Apparently you didn't see the actual video of people pulling ballots out of suitcases that were hidden under the tables and running them through the counting...

Apparently you didn't see the actual video of people pulling ballots out of suitcases that were hidden

under the tables and running them through the counting machines. So when you say there was

"no election fraud" that makes you the liar not Tucker. 

Just sayin

jjavaman wrote:

Sorry, I have to leave this thread. I didn’t realize I was talking to a full blown Q guy. Enjoy your delusional life where a twice...

Sorry, I have to leave this thread. I didn’t realize I was talking to a full blown Q guy. Enjoy your delusional life where a twice impeached one term criminal can make shit up and you cultists believe it. I mean it’s not like EVERY case of alleged voter fraud has been laughed out of court or anything. It’s not like your cultist tv station had to pay out almost $800 million because they were pushing a lie about voter fraud, but by all means keep following “your guy”. 
 What’s the latest bullshit that the fat orange loser is spreading, they want to abort children on their way out of the birth canal or in some cases kill the new born child. Fucking stable genius there.

ToolMaker wrote:

Apparently you didn't see the actual video of people pulling ballots out of suitcases that were hidden under the tables and running them through the counting...

Apparently you didn't see the actual video of people pulling ballots out of suitcases that were hidden

under the tables and running them through the counting machines. So when you say there was

"no election fraud" that makes you the liar not Tucker. 

Just sayin

jjavaman wrote:

Sorry, I have to leave this thread. I didn’t realize I was talking to a full blown Q guy. Enjoy your delusional life where a twice...

Sorry, I have to leave this thread. I didn’t realize I was talking to a full blown Q guy. Enjoy your delusional life where a twice impeached one term criminal can make shit up and you cultists believe it. I mean it’s not like EVERY case of alleged voter fraud has been laughed out of court or anything. It’s not like your cultist tv station had to pay out almost $800 million because they were pushing a lie about voter fraud, but by all means keep following “your guy”. 
 What’s the latest bullshit that the fat orange loser is spreading, they want to abort children on their way out of the birth canal or in some cases kill the new born child. Fucking stable genius there.

ToolMaker wrote:

Yup, there's the name calling. That's when you know you've won. They can't defend their position and have to start name calling. Sal Alinsky rule 4...

Yup, there's the name calling. That's when you know you've won.

They can't defend their position and have to start name calling.

Sal Alinsky rule 4, Make them live to their own standards.

Buh bye.