Recent Activity
All
implicate order Added a reply to Why do we know so little?
8/8/2014 5:13pm Lie about what? If you think Stewart is going to lie, then you must be privy to some information.
More »
implicate order Added a reply to JS7 out for Unadilla - Already posted?
8/8/2014 5:08pm It seems to me that James' detractors are the ones who are ALWAYS blowing things out of proportion ready to crucify the guy at the drop of a hat. He's taken riders out and been taken out himself. Kicked Reed's bike? What about when Reed tried to intentionally take Stewart out at Vegas? Landed on someone once a season? He's...
implicate order Added a reply to Changing Of The Guard
8/8/2014 4:59pm This. The changing of the guard happened in 2010. Reed and Stewart will probably never win a major title again. Now the twi Ryan's (or at least one at this point) have to worry about Eli, Roczen, and then Eli and Roczen will have to worry about Adam C. in a couple of years.
implicate order Added a reply to Why do we know so little?
8/8/2014 4:56pm You have no right to know anything that James Stewart does not want to tell you. It's his life and his business.
implicate order Added a reply to Inside joke thing...dumb?
8/4/2014 5:04pm Ralph knows more about sx than most of the so-called experts on this board.
implicate order Added a reply to 13yr old passed away today in Tx
8/4/2014 4:38pm RIP little guy. So sad for the family and friends.
implicate order Added a reply to Matthes is great for the sport
8/4/2014 4:38pm I think Matthes is funny. He posted some drunk tweets a few years ago that had me laughing.
implicate order Added a reply to RC vs JS...
8/4/2014 4:36pm Stewart is a better rider in SX in my opinion. He was much faster than RC indoors. Outdoors, no one could touch RC on a regular basis. Not even Stewart.
implicate order Added a reply to Is this a deal?
8/4/2014 4:34pm Do not touch it with a ten foot pole. It is either stolen or someone wants to steal $1000.00 cash from you when you meet them. Report it to the police as suspicious and do not risk your safety. If it seems too good to be true it probably is.
implicate order Added a reply to KRoc....
8/4/2014 4:33pm I agree. I think if (a BIG if) Dungey can go 1-1 again and Roczen does 3-3, then Dungey will be sitting pretty. But who knows? Maybe Roczen will come out swinging and go 1-1. I do remember in 2011, Dungey had the momentum against RV leaving Washougal, and after the two week break, RV was a new man and...
implicate order Added a reply to The IV issue
8/3/2014 1:38pm Where is your evidence that Stewart cheated then? Were you there when he was allegedly taking a ped AND taking it for a performance hit? If not, you've assumed some things. What about what Matthes has said? Was Matthes there in Stewart's motor home in between motos? If not, then all you have is hearsay. You are of course, welcome...
implicate order Added a reply to MXA and the Big Brain
8/3/2014 1:22pmimplicate order Added a reply to The IV issue
8/3/2014 1:19pm Show me where I argued for James' innocence. I've said that those accusing him of cheating are lacking in the evidence department, which they are. Please don't confuse me pointing out your assumptions, most of which are based on hearsay, with defending James's innocence. As I said earlier, I don't have to argue for James's innocence since he is not...
implicate order Added a reply to The IV issue
8/3/2014 1:15pm And this is where I stop the discussion with you. Thanks.
implicate order Added a reply to The IV issue
8/3/2014 1:09pm They very well could.
implicate order Added a reply to The IV issue
8/3/2014 1:05pm There are plenty of sources. Look in any medical dictionary; adderall used for therapy isn't used as a ped and therefore is not a ped. It's as simple as that, and that is why the rules also state that if it is a medical prescription and the proper channels are followed, athletes can use adderall. My opinion, contrary to what...
implicate order Added a reply to The IV issue
8/3/2014 12:55pm Neither is a logical assumption, both are simply assumptions. Furthermore, just because one may be more reasonable to assume it doesn't follow that the other is as well.
implicate order Added a reply to The IV issue
8/3/2014 12:44pm I'm not sure since I'm not a medical professional. I assumed it was adderall and had thought that Stewart had said as such. But I was mistaken on that.
implicate order Added a reply to The IV issue
8/3/2014 12:43pm No, I'm not OK with that. That's why I corrected myself.
implicate order Added a reply to MXA - Loretta Lynn's
8/3/2014 12:41pm Do you subscribe to MXA or visit their website on a regular basis?