Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
More human than human?
Thanks.
I love a good laugh.
Damn…that’s rich. 🤣
How many subsidies have been given to this cause? Of our money....
Oh, that?
That’s different!
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
I'm not sure what you're saying when you say not to trust the DOJ. Are you saying they're framing Trump? That's pretty unlikely. A grand jury saw the evidence and deemed it indictable. If there was no basis for their case, then it should have been an easy win in court
Wasn’t this case dismissed ?
Edit:
Also, I don’t trust anything that came out of the. Iden DOJ, Even their Grand Jury.
I think there were a few other cases recently where they made up cases against Trump, weren’t there?
Indeed it was, though that had nothing to do with the substance of the case. Judge Cannon ruled that the special counsel was improperly appointed so the case was dismissed without prejudice, but was never refiled because Trump became President. So the evidence in the case was never litigated.
Of course. But I just wanted to see some examples of what they are wrong about.
I have not heard about any cases made up against Trump. Maybe I am just forgetting about them. Do you know what they might have pertained to?
The most human. The biggest, most beautiful humans. Although in this context, biggest may not be betterer.
In my experience, the healthiest humans aren't the biggest in physical size or ego.
California did have a mandate for 100% of all new car sales to be zero emissions by 2035. Though the US Senate recently blocked that mandate, so we'll have to see how that goes. Yes, that would have only applied to California, but California buys so many cars that manufacturers could base their national sales plan on what California law requires.
https://calmatters.org/environment/2025/05/california-electric-car-mand…
The case in NY - the fraud case - struck me as dubious. There was no victim since the loans were repaid without any issue, and it’s the sort of case where even if illegal, would normally never be prosecuted if not for a prosecutor who was elected to go after Trump. This wasn’t the federal DOJ though. One of the things this shows is the perils of electing prosecutors, thereby politicizing what should be the impartial pursuit of justice.
The DOJ changes leadership at the top when there is a new President but for the most part, the same people are working there under the same rules. It’s not a radically different institution with a new set of rules with each new President and AG.
So to be clear, are you saying that a politicized DOJ literally fabricated evidence, so it’s not just the legal reasoning but the facts that are in dispute? I have nothing to say in response to that because that’s immune to falsification.
When the DOJ changes leadership I think most of the same people are still working underneath are pretty swampy, and their rules are dictated by what they can get away with.
You play dumb really well.
The fraud case is kind of like a DUI. The driver got caught before he crashed his car and caused damage or injury.
If we don't prosecute people for fraud, if the loan gets paid back; then more and more people will commit fraud to get loans. And many of those probably won't get paid back, which means investors are defrauded, and future loans will end up having higher interest rates.
I agree that most people probably wouldn't be charged in a case like this. But they should. It's one of the problems with our legal system where rich people can create massive fraud and nothing happens. But if some guy gets caught stealing a pack of cigarettes, he goes to jail.
OK, then give me an example of the DOJ making up a case against Trump.
😁
My sister in law lives on a fairway of a golf course with a sand bunker in front of her back porch. That move is the norm not the exception. 🤨
See what I mean? Wasting your time. You show facts, he doesn’t trust them (that was always going to be the response no matter what). Then instead of addressing the facts, they want you to argue over what the facts even are. They put out their “facts” from a far right wing station that’s completely false. You put out yours that’s actually true and they say well can’t trust em! Once they get you arguing over what the facts even are, you’ve lost. You ask him to defend his guy, he can’t. They just want to get you off in the weeds instead of actually acknowledging the guy they’ve made their cult leader is a convicted felon, held civilly liable of rape, who is a massive piece of shit and has cheated on every wife he’s had. @Gworm is big time deep in the cult. His orange cult leader can do no wrong. I’d guess he has flown the flag outside of his house for ten years, has a red hat on his head almost all the time, and a bumper sticker on his vehicle.
It's the apparent political motivation for the prosecution that's objectionable - again, going back to the principle that like cases ought to be treated alike.
I'm really not making any friends here by arguing with both sides, am I?
Pit Row
I don’t think he’s playing.
Well we know the two of you aren’t.
If you think I'm dumb because I can't remember the DOJ making up charges against Trump, then it should be easy for you to provide an example when they did.
Not technically the DOJ, but Tish James, Alvin Bragg, and Big Fany down in Fulton county were in cahoots with and meeting with the Biden administration.
Dave woke up!
He had flashbacks of screwing over his former partner while playing dumb. 😂
I have no clue who the fuck Dave is.
Would you be proud if your daughter or sister brought home someone exactly like your cult leader?
Wasting your time. They are in too deep to reason with.
I’ve said several times that I think he is a buffoon. Very far from a cult leader.
But I do think he’s been waaaay better of a president than I initially thought he would.
If you think Biden, or whoever was running the joint, was good president, or that Kamalhead would have been better, well, good for you.
Wait a minute.... you want @EVH4Ever to back up something he said with facts?
That's a good one bro, let me give you some advice, don't hold your breath for that to happen.
Again, you’re too stupid to reason with at all. You can’t even admit your cult leader lost in 2020. You’re pathetic.
Dude. Charles Mansons followers would have been embarrassed by the level of unwavering blind worship you guys have for Trump.
Post a reply to: Presidential cognitive issues