Remember when NBC used to only broadcast the first half of an NFL game?

Tbteam
Posts
2869
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Ormond Beach, FL, USA

Me neither. 

25
2
|
Johnny Ringo
Posts
8219
Joined
1/11/2016
Location
Tombstone, AZ, USA
6/28/2025 6:34am

Can you give me viewership numbers comparing Moto and NFL? Thx

19
9
FWYT
Posts
3567
Joined
5/25/2014
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
6/28/2025 6:49am

No, I don't recall that, but then again I don't really follow baseball.

32
2
6/28/2025 6:51am

Hit us back when the viewership climbs to NFL levels. 

Until then the tv package we have now is amazing. 

 

14
10
6/28/2025 6:56am

Lets just hope there isn't a last lap battle to the death between Eli and Jett and they cut away to Heidi.

 

10
1

The Shop

Tbteam
Posts
2869
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Ormond Beach, FL, USA
6/28/2025 7:04am

Can you give me viewership numbers comparing Moto and NFL? Thx

Irrelevant. They wouldn’t only broadcast half of a girls softball game. 

11
2
Dave v3.0
Posts
722
Joined
7/15/2022
Location
Ozark, AL, USA
6/28/2025 7:07am

They're just planning for the shortened moto due to circumstances beyond their control😂.  Like if the Wick gets too rough or someone has to throw away their goggles...

8
3
JMR1976
Posts
1164
Joined
5/15/2015
Location
Aptos, CA, USA
6/28/2025 7:30am

My butt hurts.

APLMAN99
Posts
12784
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR, USA
Fantasy
6/28/2025 7:43am

Can you give me viewership numbers comparing Moto and NFL? Thx

Tbteam wrote:

Irrelevant. They wouldn’t only broadcast half of a girls softball game. 

Girls softball is irrelevant because there is no natural ‘half’ for them to broadcast. 

I get the frustration, moto isn’t the same as most other sports. But for the ‘free’ broadcast I’d look at it as a bonus more than a slight. And to be honest, it’s probably packaged in the ideal format (1 hour at a time) for most of the ‘casual’ audience. 

But for a better comparison, I believe that there are plenty of golf events where the major outlet only telecasts the last two rounds and tennis tournaments that only show a small portion of the actual matches played. 

6
3
USA
Posts
2629
Joined
9/4/2016
Location
Richmond, TX, USA
Fantasy
6/28/2025 7:56am

Can you give me viewership numbers comparing Moto and NFL? Thx

Tbteam wrote:

Irrelevant. They wouldn’t only broadcast half of a girls softball game. 

APLMAN99 wrote:
Girls softball is irrelevant because there is no natural ‘half’ for them to broadcast. I get the frustration, moto isn’t the same as most other sports. But...

Girls softball is irrelevant because there is no natural ‘half’ for them to broadcast. 

I get the frustration, moto isn’t the same as most other sports. But for the ‘free’ broadcast I’d look at it as a bonus more than a slight. And to be honest, it’s probably packaged in the ideal format (1 hour at a time) for most of the ‘casual’ audience. 

But for a better comparison, I believe that there are plenty of golf events where the major outlet only telecasts the last two rounds and tennis tournaments that only show a small portion of the actual matches played. 

Lol, you say a stick and ball sport is irrelevant to compare and then reference other stick and ball sports. A better comparison would be NASCAR or IndyCar

2
1
APLMAN99
Posts
12784
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR, USA
Fantasy
6/28/2025 8:05am
Tbteam wrote:

Irrelevant. They wouldn’t only broadcast half of a girls softball game. 

APLMAN99 wrote:
Girls softball is irrelevant because there is no natural ‘half’ for them to broadcast. I get the frustration, moto isn’t the same as most other sports. But...

Girls softball is irrelevant because there is no natural ‘half’ for them to broadcast. 

I get the frustration, moto isn’t the same as most other sports. But for the ‘free’ broadcast I’d look at it as a bonus more than a slight. And to be honest, it’s probably packaged in the ideal format (1 hour at a time) for most of the ‘casual’ audience. 

But for a better comparison, I believe that there are plenty of golf events where the major outlet only telecasts the last two rounds and tennis tournaments that only show a small portion of the actual matches played. 

USA wrote:
Lol, you say a stick and ball sport is irrelevant to compare and then reference other stick and ball sports. A better comparison would be NASCAR...

Lol, you say a stick and ball sport is irrelevant to compare and then reference other stick and ball sports. A better comparison would be NASCAR or IndyCar

I said that “girls softball” is irrelevant, because there is no natural ‘half’ in it. 

But yes, it is very difficult to compare sports in general because they all have such different styles of play and structure of events. Even the examples I used are not perfect as they occur over multiple days, the competitors don’t play each other directly at all times, etc. 

But either way, the NBC ‘free’ moto broadcast is a bonus I think. 

2
3
Gworm
Posts
2816
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
6/28/2025 8:16am

I liked it better when we had to wait until the Pro Bowlers Tour was over so we could watch the Carlsbad USGP once a year. 

2
APLMAN99
Posts
12784
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR, USA
Fantasy
6/28/2025 8:42am
Gworm wrote:

I liked it better when we had to wait until the Pro Bowlers Tour was over so we could watch the Carlsbad USGP once a year. 

And they would cut away ‘mid moto’ to show bits of things that you never even realized was a sport!  It wasn’t called Wide World of Sports for nothing!  

1
1
JM485
Posts
5823
Joined
10/1/2013
Location
Davis, CA, USA
6/28/2025 8:49am

Hit us back when the viewership climbs to NFL levels. 

Until then the tv package we have now is amazing. 

 

The TV package we had 10 years ago was better than it is now.  

2
8
yak651
Posts
8989
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI, USA
Fantasy
6/28/2025 8:50am

It would be much better to show the 2nd moto, at least then they can give first moto highlights and the casual fan that stumbles across it will know who the overall winner for the day is. It’s ok, all of you defending this can admit that it’s a bad decision to just air the first moto. JT, Weege and DC aren’t going to hold it against you…

2
davis224
Posts
7565
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Cornland, IL, USA
Fantasy
6/28/2025 9:01am
yak651 wrote:
It would be much better to show the 2nd moto, at least then they can give first moto highlights and the casual fan that stumbles across...

It would be much better to show the 2nd moto, at least then they can give first moto highlights and the casual fan that stumbles across it will know who the overall winner for the day is. It’s ok, all of you defending this can admit that it’s a bad decision to just air the first moto. JT, Weege and DC aren’t going to hold it against you…

Then they would have to start the day 2 hours earlier, the free time slot is the free time slot.

1
2
6/28/2025 9:25am
yak651 wrote:
It would be much better to show the 2nd moto, at least then they can give first moto highlights and the casual fan that stumbles across...

It would be much better to show the 2nd moto, at least then they can give first moto highlights and the casual fan that stumbles across it will know who the overall winner for the day is. It’s ok, all of you defending this can admit that it’s a bad decision to just air the first moto. JT, Weege and DC aren’t going to hold it against you…

Like CBS Sports does with the MXGP races ? 

6
6/28/2025 10:54am
Tbteam wrote:

Me neither. 

Remember when the nationals would draw 17.5 million viewers every week ?  Me neither. 

1
3
6/28/2025 10:58am

Can you give me viewership numbers comparing Moto and NFL? Thx

Tbteam wrote:

Irrelevant. They wouldn’t only broadcast half of a girls softball game. 

As a die hard college fast pitch women's softball fan you are wrong about that too. ESPN is busy with the pillow fighting and slippery stairs and car jitsu so half the softball games are joined in progress when its half over

 

2
HondaFan33
Posts
185
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lawrence, KS, USA
6/28/2025 11:04am

Cable television is dying and the importance of being on there isn’t what it was 10 years ago. 

3
AMetts
Posts
1183
Joined
6/15/2022
Location
Lincolnton, NC, USA
6/28/2025 6:50pm

How many people do you think just happen across a MX race they didn’t know was going on NBC then would stay and watch 2 more hours of racing? Anyone that into it is already watching it on peacock.

It’s just a bonus to have a moto on NBC and maybe will translate to someone getting a peacock subscription.

2
2
Wandell
Posts
7850
Joined
12/17/2008
Location
Cairo, GA, USA
6/28/2025 7:15pm Edited Date/Time 6/28/2025 7:16pm

Hit us back when the viewership climbs to NFL levels. 

Until then the tv package we have now is amazing. 

 

YOU ARE CORECT SIR. FOOTBALL IS AMERICAS NATIONAL PASSTIME AND I DOUBT PRO MX/SX WILL EVER COME CLOSE TO THAT LEVEL

3
RichieW13
Posts
2502
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
7/2/2025 9:39am

Hit us back when the viewership climbs to NFL levels. 

Until then the tv package we have now is amazing. 

 

JM485 wrote:

The TV package we had 10 years ago was better than it is now.  

The one that was on Fox Sports?  That would sometimes be delayed until later in the evening?  Sometimes delayed to the next day?  Sometimes pushed to a different channel.  Sometimes we'd miss the beginning because the event before ran long?  And, of course, there was zero option to stream a replay online (legally). 

I don't know how we could have a better TV package than we have right now.  Unless you don't count live streaming as a "TV package" since it isn't on broadcast or cable TV.  Right now we get the full live broadcast available every week.  And we have the full replay available indefinitely.  And sometimes it is broadcasted live or delayed on broadcast/cable TV stations.   

My only complaint is that if you wait more than about 90 minutes past the start to begin watching, the live broadcast doesn't go back that far, so you have to wait a couple hours until the full replay is available.

3
2
RichieW13
Posts
2502
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
7/2/2025 9:42am
HondaFan33 wrote:

Cable television is dying and the importance of being on there isn’t what it was 10 years ago. 

Yeah, I don't think my 30-year-old son has watched cable television in 10 years.  He only watches streaming shows.  But he's not a sports fan.  Maybe millenials/Gen-Z who are sports fans watch a little more cable TV than he does?  But I don't think many.  I wonder what percentage of people under age 35, who don't live with their parents, even have cable TV?  10%?

1
motomike137
Posts
8180
Joined
4/22/2010
Location
Fenton, MI, USA
7/2/2025 9:44am
JM485 wrote:

The TV package we had 10 years ago was better than it is now.  

Get Peacock ya cheapskate and then get back to us on that statement.

3
1
Alex814
Posts
1248
Joined
12/18/2014
Location
USA
7/2/2025 9:46am

The hate is from people paying $100/month for cable that don't get motocross included with it.

Also. NFL doesn't have 35 x 4 minutes of gametime. It's less than two motos worth of time over the course of three hours.

1
motomike137
Posts
8180
Joined
4/22/2010
Location
Fenton, MI, USA
7/2/2025 9:46am
RichieW13 wrote:
Yeah, I don't think my 30-year-old son has watched cable television in 10 years.  He only watches streaming shows.  But he's not a sports fan.  Maybe...

Yeah, I don't think my 30-year-old son has watched cable television in 10 years.  He only watches streaming shows.  But he's not a sports fan.  Maybe millenials/Gen-Z who are sports fans watch a little more cable TV than he does?  But I don't think many.  I wonder what percentage of people under age 35, who don't live with their parents, even have cable TV?  10%?

I've been streaming just about as long as that. I have friends and family that still have traditional packages that they pay sky high prices for. I just chuckle. Things have changed and aren't going back ever.

motomike137
Posts
8180
Joined
4/22/2010
Location
Fenton, MI, USA
7/2/2025 9:51am
RichieW13 wrote:
The one that was on Fox Sports?  That would sometimes be delayed until later in the evening?  Sometimes delayed to the next day?  Sometimes pushed to...

The one that was on Fox Sports?  That would sometimes be delayed until later in the evening?  Sometimes delayed to the next day?  Sometimes pushed to a different channel.  Sometimes we'd miss the beginning because the event before ran long?  And, of course, there was zero option to stream a replay online (legally). 

I don't know how we could have a better TV package than we have right now.  Unless you don't count live streaming as a "TV package" since it isn't on broadcast or cable TV.  Right now we get the full live broadcast available every week.  And we have the full replay available indefinitely.  And sometimes it is broadcasted live or delayed on broadcast/cable TV stations.   

My only complaint is that if you wait more than about 90 minutes past the start to begin watching, the live broadcast doesn't go back that far, so you have to wait a couple hours until the full replay is available.

I was out on our pontoon all day Saturday and it was painful waiting for the replay to get posted. It was also tough to ignore the condensed highlight shows that showed the class winners. Actually I saw Haiden on was the thumbnail of one of them so I knew he likely won the 250's. I did manage to not know who won the 450's and was all geeked up to watch thinking there would be a batlle royal but Jett had other plans Sad

MOTO13
Posts
626
Joined
12/22/2017
Location
Elkhorn, WI, USA
7/2/2025 9:55am

I remember getting the results from a SX or outdoor the following Friday in the USA Today newspaper and then 2 months later get to watch a 30 minute TV breakdown/race recap on Speed. This wasn't even full heats or mains. What we have now is friggin amazing...quit bitching. You have no GD clue how bad it used to be. Frigging Karen's everywhere. 

2
1
RichieW13
Posts
2502
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
7/2/2025 10:00am
RichieW13 wrote:
Yeah, I don't think my 30-year-old son has watched cable television in 10 years.  He only watches streaming shows.  But he's not a sports fan.  Maybe...

Yeah, I don't think my 30-year-old son has watched cable television in 10 years.  He only watches streaming shows.  But he's not a sports fan.  Maybe millenials/Gen-Z who are sports fans watch a little more cable TV than he does?  But I don't think many.  I wonder what percentage of people under age 35, who don't live with their parents, even have cable TV?  10%?

I've been streaming just about as long as that. I have friends and family that still have traditional packages that they pay sky high prices for...

I've been streaming just about as long as that. I have friends and family that still have traditional packages that they pay sky high prices for. I just chuckle. Things have changed and aren't going back ever.

Yeah, I'm old.  I grew up on cable TV.  I still like having all the channels, and just flipping through to see what's on.  But I pay $325 for my cable/phone/internet bundle.  Every time I make that payment I question myself.  I have no idea why I still pay for a landline that I basically never use.  

1
3
LungButter
Posts
8684
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID, USA
7/2/2025 10:02am
JM485 wrote:

The TV package we had 10 years ago was better than it is now.  

Back when you had to have a $150/month cable package to watch the races?

How do you figure?

You aren't one of those guys who thinks it was "free" because it came with your $150 cable package are you?

4

Post a reply to: Remember when NBC used to only broadcast the first half of an NFL game?

The Latest