Signal debacle

TeamGreen
Posts
37793
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
3/26/2025 3:27pm
Here's a live stream from Ward Carroll, a former Top Scope F-14 Naval Aviator and professor at the Naval War College. He says this kind of carelessness...

Here's a live stream from Ward Carroll, a former Top Scope F-14 Naval Aviator and professor at the Naval War College. 

He says this kind of carelessness has tremendous potential for unintended consequences including giving the bad guys plenty of time to get out of the crosshairs before the strike happens along with a chance to get their substantial anti-aircraft weapons on target against our aircrews.

https://www.youtube.com/live/t5uVwdKuN2Q?si=Eqcb82qP2K2k90rT&t=9

FastEddy wrote:
Maybe ole whiskey nose didn't get the memo - this wasn't a surprise attack. Civilian targets were hit..O Hospital.  By law they have to be warned...

Maybe ole whiskey nose didn't get the memo - this wasn't a surprise attack. Civilian targets were hit..O Hospital.  By law they have to be warned ahead of time. That is scary though - a fighter pilot that doesn't understand Article 57 of the GC and know we warn all targets that could involve civilian casualties far ahead of time. Now if they hit civilian targets and didnt warn like Obama would do with his drone strikes... I say lock them all up. 

 

It’s almost as if the affected populous was warned “4+” hours in advance?! 🤣

1
1
early
Posts
10109
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
3/26/2025 3:29pm

Luckily none of this will matter when the tariffs hit next week and the economy gets wrecked.

1
3
Miquon MX 28x
Posts
117
Joined
7/3/2020
Location
San Marino, CA, USA
3/26/2025 3:45pm
Here's a live stream from Ward Carroll, a former Top Scope F-14 Naval Aviator and professor at the Naval War College. He says this kind of carelessness...

Here's a live stream from Ward Carroll, a former Top Scope F-14 Naval Aviator and professor at the Naval War College. 

He says this kind of carelessness has tremendous potential for unintended consequences including giving the bad guys plenty of time to get out of the crosshairs before the strike happens along with a chance to get their substantial anti-aircraft weapons on target against our aircrews.

https://www.youtube.com/live/t5uVwdKuN2Q?si=Eqcb82qP2K2k90rT&t=9

FastEddy wrote:
Maybe ole whiskey nose didn't get the memo - this wasn't a surprise attack. Civilian targets were hit..O Hospital.  By law they have to be warned...

Maybe ole whiskey nose didn't get the memo - this wasn't a surprise attack. Civilian targets were hit..O Hospital.  By law they have to be warned ahead of time. That is scary though - a fighter pilot that doesn't understand Article 57 of the GC and know we warn all targets that could involve civilian casualties far ahead of time. Now if they hit civilian targets and didnt warn like Obama would do with his drone strikes... I say lock them all up. 

 

Hi Eddy,

Ward explains there were multiple targets including the girlfriend's house of a particularly high-value target that on-the-ground intelligence indicated would be at that location during the strike. 

BTW Top Scope is Navy talk for RIO (Radar Intercept Officer), not the pilot. 

Best

3
2
FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
3/26/2025 3:59pm
Hi Eddy,Ward explains there were multiple targets including the girlfriend's house of a particularly high-value target that on-the-ground intelligence indicated would be at that location during...

Hi Eddy,

Ward explains there were multiple targets including the girlfriend's house of a particularly high-value target that on-the-ground intelligence indicated would be at that location during the strike. 

BTW Top Scope is Navy talk for RIO (Radar Intercept Officer), not the pilot. 

Best

I know of the building and the collapse - from the messages. I'd also assume there were other civilians around the building. I wonder if he went to his GF's to hide out. Because he was aware the strikes were coming. Seems like we had decent intel on him...I'd also assume we had drone footage of his movements too along with an asset on the ground feeding intel to an intelligence officer. Then up the chain.

2

The Shop

Miquon MX 28x
Posts
117
Joined
7/3/2020
Location
San Marino, CA, USA
3/26/2025 4:04pm
Hi Eddy,Ward explains there were multiple targets including the girlfriend's house of a particularly high-value target that on-the-ground intelligence indicated would be at that location during...

Hi Eddy,

Ward explains there were multiple targets including the girlfriend's house of a particularly high-value target that on-the-ground intelligence indicated would be at that location during the strike. 

BTW Top Scope is Navy talk for RIO (Radar Intercept Officer), not the pilot. 

Best

FastEddy wrote:
I know of the building and the collapse - from the messages. I'd also assume there were other civilians around the building. I wonder if he...

I know of the building and the collapse - from the messages. I'd also assume there were other civilians around the building. I wonder if he went to his GF's to hide out. Because he was aware the strikes were coming. Seems like we had decent intel on him...I'd also assume we had drone footage of his movements too along with an asset on the ground feeding intel to an intelligence officer. Then up the chain.

I'm not sure, he didn't get into the details. I'm guessing you're right, he was hiding out there. Hopefully they got the bad guy without civilian casualties! 

 

1
APLMAN99
Posts
12996
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR, USA
Fantasy
3/26/2025 4:24pm
truck wrote:

I do not agree at all that because the mission didn't suffer that there's nothing to be concerned about. 

FastEddy wrote:
Please tell me what was compromised. What damage it's caused?  I've read everything on the subject. I haven't found anything that was a "Big Problem".The concerns...

Please tell me what was compromised. What damage it's caused?  I've read everything on the subject. I haven't found anything that was a "Big Problem".

The concerns are minor and have been addressed. It's also led to more security type investigations. They will beef up opsec with Elons consultants. 

What security concerns do you still have relating directly to this topic? 

Eddy, I understand what you’re saying but I don’t think that the MC comparison is apt. 

I’d compare it to workplace safety more than that. Imagine you have a large grinder/shredder that consumes cardboard for recycling. You have a maintenance tech working on the machine, and he intentionally leaves tools on the top of the grinder because he thinks it’ll save him time if he needs to work on it later. It’s obviously a safety hazard because the tools could fall in the grinder and cause catastrophic failure, and that might actually lead to injuries to people working nearby. 

Now, you discover that the tech left the tools there intentionally. Do you view it as not a big deal because luckily the tools didn’t fall into the grinder?  Or do you treat it as the unsafe act that it is and hold the tech accountable?

1
3
FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
3/26/2025 4:52pm Edited Date/Time 3/26/2025 5:07pm
APLMAN99 wrote:
Eddy, I understand what you’re saying but I don’t think that the MC comparison is apt. I’d compare it to workplace safety more than that. Imagine you...

Eddy, I understand what you’re saying but I don’t think that the MC comparison is apt. 

I’d compare it to workplace safety more than that. Imagine you have a large grinder/shredder that consumes cardboard for recycling. You have a maintenance tech working on the machine, and he intentionally leaves tools on the top of the grinder because he thinks it’ll save him time if he needs to work on it later. It’s obviously a safety hazard because the tools could fall in the grinder and cause catastrophic failure, and that might actually lead to injuries to people working nearby. 

Now, you discover that the tech left the tools there intentionally. Do you view it as not a big deal because luckily the tools didn’t fall into the grinder?  Or do you treat it as the unsafe act that it is and hold the tech accountable?

I understand what you are saying.  But there's no harm done. Other than a talk and making sure it doesn't happen again. No big deal. If they do it a second time... I'd of moved the tools and grind wood with the grinder and fill  it with saw dust.  Put the tools back and watch their reaction when it catches fire once they start grinding metal. lol  Then fire their ass if it was 2X tool misplacement guy.

I deal with people often in regards to security breaches ect...Fixed plenty of screw ups over the years.   I've done red team pen testing work and all that good consultant stuff. When we compromised a target - I always congratulated them. They would look at me like I was nuts.  I would say you learned something today and people much smarter than you have made bigger mistakes. Educate them and stay positive -that's all you can really do. If something happened twice...like lets say I was able to copy someones access badge to breach a facility and use it to get in to gather more intel ect... Now if I did lets twice within a year to that same employee - who had their access badge exposed in a public place where i could copy it easily. They were getting canned. 

 

2
Joey Bridges
Posts
10454
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN, USA
3/26/2025 5:49pm

In the meantime...

Gm QPs6XEAAnhvk
1
BH_84
Posts
392
Joined
10/28/2024
Location
Cameron, ON, CA
Fantasy
3/26/2025 6:01pm Edited Date/Time 3/26/2025 6:03pm
FastEddy wrote:
I understand what you are saying.  But there's no harm done. Other than a talk and making sure it doesn't happen again. No big deal. If...

I understand what you are saying.  But there's no harm done. Other than a talk and making sure it doesn't happen again. No big deal. If they do it a second time... I'd of moved the tools and grind wood with the grinder and fill  it with saw dust.  Put the tools back and watch their reaction when it catches fire once they start grinding metal. lol  Then fire their ass if it was 2X tool misplacement guy.

I deal with people often in regards to security breaches ect...Fixed plenty of screw ups over the years.   I've done red team pen testing work and all that good consultant stuff. When we compromised a target - I always congratulated them. They would look at me like I was nuts.  I would say you learned something today and people much smarter than you have made bigger mistakes. Educate them and stay positive -that's all you can really do. If something happened twice...like lets say I was able to copy someones access badge to breach a facility and use it to get in to gather more intel ect... Now if I did lets twice within a year to that same employee - who had their access badge exposed in a public place where i could copy it easily. They were getting canned. 

 

Have to disagree with you here. In your anectote, yes, give that guy a second chance. 

The level these guys are at, the power they wield and the lives that count on them mean that there is no margin for error here. You simply cannot have f ups of this scale. This is the US military, supposed to be the best in the world, and the guys at the very top of it have embarrassed every single soldier, sailor, marine, and pilot. 

Not only that, now that the world has seen this incompetence, there will be many more attempts to gain access to sensitive info passing between these people. Your enemies, who may have never even considered the possibility, will be trying more to worm their way in and access sensitive info. 

5
2
FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
3/26/2025 6:19pm Edited Date/Time 3/26/2025 6:22pm
BH_84 wrote:
Have to disagree with you here. In your anectote, yes, give that guy a second chance. The level these guys are at, the power they wield and...

Have to disagree with you here. In your anectote, yes, give that guy a second chance. 

The level these guys are at, the power they wield and the lives that count on them mean that there is no margin for error here. You simply cannot have f ups of this scale. This is the US military, supposed to be the best in the world, and the guys at the very top of it have embarrassed every single soldier, sailor, marine, and pilot. 

Not only that, now that the world has seen this incompetence, there will be many more attempts to gain access to sensitive info passing between these people. Your enemies, who may have never even considered the possibility, will be trying more to worm their way in and access sensitive info. 

Actually there was margin for error. The mission was a success even with their error.  That is fact. No and's if's or but's about it! 

By the way - every human on this planet is vulnerable to security issues. Even the best of the best in the sec industry. Shit happens to the best of them.

All we can do is train them and let them learn from their lessons. 

I don't know of one active duty person that is embarrassed.  lol Other than the folks involved in the convo. And they should be embarrassed. 

Plenty of our enemies try to worm their way in every second of the day,you can track the attacks here https://threatmap.checkpoint.com/

 

3
2
TeamGreen
Posts
37793
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
3/26/2025 6:24pm

You know what really, really, really makes these Kooky TDS sufferers sooooooooo pissed off?

Mission Success

Because, they don’t understand it.

😂

3
8
truck
Posts
4049
Joined
6/10/2015
Location
Louisville, KY, USA
Fantasy
3/26/2025 6:25pm
BH_84 wrote:
Have to disagree with you here. In your anectote, yes, give that guy a second chance. The level these guys are at, the power they wield and...

Have to disagree with you here. In your anectote, yes, give that guy a second chance. 

The level these guys are at, the power they wield and the lives that count on them mean that there is no margin for error here. You simply cannot have f ups of this scale. This is the US military, supposed to be the best in the world, and the guys at the very top of it have embarrassed every single soldier, sailor, marine, and pilot. 

Not only that, now that the world has seen this incompetence, there will be many more attempts to gain access to sensitive info passing between these people. Your enemies, who may have never even considered the possibility, will be trying more to worm their way in and access sensitive info. 

FastEddy wrote:
Actually there was margin for error. The mission was a success even with their error.  That is fact. No and's if's or but's about it! By...

Actually there was margin for error. The mission was a success even with their error.  That is fact. No and's if's or but's about it! 

By the way - every human on this planet is vulnerable to security issues. Even the best of the best in the sec industry. Shit happens to the best of them.

All we can do is train them and let them learn from their lessons. 

I don't know of one active duty person that is embarrassed.  lol Other than the folks involved in the convo. And they should be embarrassed. 

Plenty of our enemies try to worm their way in every second of the day,you can track the attacks here https://threatmap.checkpoint.com/

 

I'm confident you don't live your life in a way that reflects your continued statement that the end result means there's no problem with the process. If a pilot flies drunk but doesn't crash is that just a learning lesson? He good to fly tomorrow because he didn't crash? Run a red light and don't crash, no problem....? countless examples in every day life that do not line up at all with the approach you're taking on this. 

3
4
FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
3/26/2025 6:35pm Edited Date/Time 3/26/2025 6:56pm
truck wrote:
I'm confident you don't live your life in a way that reflects your continued statement that the end result means there's no problem with the process...

I'm confident you don't live your life in a way that reflects your continued statement that the end result means there's no problem with the process. If a pilot flies drunk but doesn't crash is that just a learning lesson? He good to fly tomorrow because he didn't crash? Run a red light and don't crash, no problem....? countless examples in every day life that do not line up at all with the approach you're taking on this. 

We aren't talking consuming booze and operating fighter jets. We are talking security. Yes I take it very serious. But I'm also smart enough to understand that people make mistakes. And the best way to learn is from a  mistake. It's part of the sec industry.  Especially in that area. It doesn't matter how smart they are. Everyone is vulnerable.  Dudes made a mistake and learned from it. Not much else can be done. We could fire them and then put someone else in there and it's possible they make a mistake too. I'd rather have the guy that fucked up once and learned then a new guy I would have to worry about. Now if they fuck up a second time - that just means there will be a third. So they would be gone. 

As for how I live my life - all is well. 

. by

 

5
1
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
3/26/2025 6:47pm
FastEddy wrote:
We aren't talking consuming booze and operating fighter jets. We are talking security. Yes I take it very serious. But I'm also smart enough to understand...

We aren't talking consuming booze and operating fighter jets. We are talking security. Yes I take it very serious. But I'm also smart enough to understand that people make mistakes. And the best way to learn is from a  mistake. It's part of the sec industry.  Especially in that area. It doesn't matter how smart they are. Everyone is vulnerable.  Dudes made a mistake and learned from it. Not much else can be done. We could fire them and then put someone else in there and it's possible they make a mistake too. I'd rather have the guy that fucked up once and learned then a new guy I would have to worry about. Now if they fuck up a second time - that just means there will be a third. So they would be gone. 

As for how I live my life - all is well. 

. by

 

You probably make in a day what I make in 2 weeks 🤣🤣

1
1
FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
3/26/2025 6:49pm Edited Date/Time 3/26/2025 6:50pm
FastEddy wrote:
We aren't talking consuming booze and operating fighter jets. We are talking security. Yes I take it very serious. But I'm also smart enough to understand...

We aren't talking consuming booze and operating fighter jets. We are talking security. Yes I take it very serious. But I'm also smart enough to understand that people make mistakes. And the best way to learn is from a  mistake. It's part of the sec industry.  Especially in that area. It doesn't matter how smart they are. Everyone is vulnerable.  Dudes made a mistake and learned from it. Not much else can be done. We could fire them and then put someone else in there and it's possible they make a mistake too. I'd rather have the guy that fucked up once and learned then a new guy I would have to worry about. Now if they fuck up a second time - that just means there will be a third. So they would be gone. 

As for how I live my life - all is well. 

. by

 

You probably make in a day what I make in 2 weeks 🤣🤣

Get into tech stuff. I got @smoker  into it back in 2014.  He had nothing going on at the time...he started making cash - then started his own company. He's become successful last I talked to him.

inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
3/26/2025 6:51pm

Lot of Karens in here...

"I said no mustard and there's mustard on this burger!"

"I'm sorry ma'am. I'll fix a fresh one and we'll take this off your bill."

"No, I want you fired!!! Get the manager!! And don't assume my gender!!"

5
5
TeamGreen
Posts
37793
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
3/26/2025 7:08pm
truck wrote:
I'm confident you don't live your life in a way that reflects your continued statement that the end result means there's no problem with the process...

I'm confident you don't live your life in a way that reflects your continued statement that the end result means there's no problem with the process. If a pilot flies drunk but doesn't crash is that just a learning lesson? He good to fly tomorrow because he didn't crash? Run a red light and don't crash, no problem....? countless examples in every day life that do not line up at all with the approach you're taking on this. 

FastEddy wrote:
We aren't talking consuming booze and operating fighter jets. We are talking security. Yes I take it very serious. But I'm also smart enough to understand...

We aren't talking consuming booze and operating fighter jets. We are talking security. Yes I take it very serious. But I'm also smart enough to understand that people make mistakes. And the best way to learn is from a  mistake. It's part of the sec industry.  Especially in that area. It doesn't matter how smart they are. Everyone is vulnerable.  Dudes made a mistake and learned from it. Not much else can be done. We could fire them and then put someone else in there and it's possible they make a mistake too. I'd rather have the guy that fucked up once and learned then a new guy I would have to worry about. Now if they fuck up a second time - that just means there will be a third. So they would be gone. 

As for how I live my life - all is well. 

. by

 

Like I was sayin’…

Mission Success 👍🏼

4
1
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
3/26/2025 7:22pm

Did The Atlantic ever provide proof that classified info was shared in the chat?

1
1
BH_84
Posts
392
Joined
10/28/2024
Location
Cameron, ON, CA
Fantasy
3/26/2025 7:22pm
BH_84 wrote:
Have to disagree with you here. In your anectote, yes, give that guy a second chance. The level these guys are at, the power they wield and...

Have to disagree with you here. In your anectote, yes, give that guy a second chance. 

The level these guys are at, the power they wield and the lives that count on them mean that there is no margin for error here. You simply cannot have f ups of this scale. This is the US military, supposed to be the best in the world, and the guys at the very top of it have embarrassed every single soldier, sailor, marine, and pilot. 

Not only that, now that the world has seen this incompetence, there will be many more attempts to gain access to sensitive info passing between these people. Your enemies, who may have never even considered the possibility, will be trying more to worm their way in and access sensitive info. 

FastEddy wrote:
Actually there was margin for error. The mission was a success even with their error.  That is fact. No and's if's or but's about it! By...

Actually there was margin for error. The mission was a success even with their error.  That is fact. No and's if's or but's about it! 

By the way - every human on this planet is vulnerable to security issues. Even the best of the best in the sec industry. Shit happens to the best of them.

All we can do is train them and let them learn from their lessons. 

I don't know of one active duty person that is embarrassed.  lol Other than the folks involved in the convo. And they should be embarrassed. 

Plenty of our enemies try to worm their way in every second of the day,you can track the attacks here https://threatmap.checkpoint.com/

 

If beating the Houthis is all you aspire to then yeah, I guess it’s fine to have F ups this bad. 

If being the military that leads the free world is what you want, then this type of shit absolutely can not happen. 

3
3
FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
3/26/2025 7:26pm
BH_84 wrote:
If beating the Houthis is all you aspire to then yeah, I guess it’s fine to have F ups this bad. If being the military that leads...

If beating the Houthis is all you aspire to then yeah, I guess it’s fine to have F ups this bad. 

If being the military that leads the free world is what you want, then this type of shit absolutely can not happen. 

Ok, thank you. I will advise the President on Truth Social.

4
1
EVH4Ever
Posts
1857
Joined
3/6/2025
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
3/26/2025 7:35pm
IMG 2699 0.jpeg?VersionId=bu5cUVAxoSMf5gatkzItsp6EDp53AY
6
6
truck
Posts
4049
Joined
6/10/2015
Location
Louisville, KY, USA
Fantasy
3/26/2025 7:36pm

congrats....

040416 campaign daily vlarge5p 0.jpg?VersionId=Emdtog6rdHNAivVSyQ
2
3
BH_84
Posts
392
Joined
10/28/2024
Location
Cameron, ON, CA
Fantasy
3/26/2025 7:57pm
EVH4Ever wrote:
IMG 2699 0.jpeg?VersionId=bu5cUVAxoSMf5gatkzItsp6EDp53AY

Peaceful protesters. Lol. 

Ask the citizens of Ottawa how peaceful those assholes we’re

1
2
EVH4Ever
Posts
1857
Joined
3/6/2025
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
3/26/2025 8:04pm
BH_84 wrote:

Peaceful protesters. Lol. 

Ask the citizens of Ottawa how peaceful those assholes we’re

I’m asking you since you’re from Quebec, I think.

1
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
3/26/2025 8:09pm
BH_84 wrote:

Peaceful protesters. Lol. 

Ask the citizens of Ottawa how peaceful those assholes we’re

EVH4Ever wrote:

I’m asking you since you’re from Quebec, I think.

He's definitely from Quebec. He's the Oracle of Quebec. 

giphy %281%29 4
2
1
lappedrider
Posts
1567
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Tooele, UT, USA
3/26/2025 8:16pm
EVH4Ever wrote:
IMG 2699 0.jpeg?VersionId=bu5cUVAxoSMf5gatkzItsp6EDp53AY

You do realize who was president when these things went into effect? 

2
1
EVH4Ever
Posts
1857
Joined
3/6/2025
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
3/26/2025 8:43pm

Yes, thank you.

2
TeamGreen
Posts
37793
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
3/26/2025 10:13pm
BH_84 wrote:

Peaceful protesters. Lol. 

Ask the citizens of Ottawa how peaceful those assholes we’re

EVH4Ever wrote:

I’m asking you since you’re from Quebec, I think.

He's definitely from Quebec. He's the Oracle of Quebec. 

He's definitely from Quebec. He's the Oracle of Quebec. 

giphy %281%29 4

There’s no Canada like French Canada!🇨🇦 

2
1
eins4eins
Posts
227
Joined
10/2/2012
Location
DE
3/27/2025 12:47am
FastEddy wrote:
We aren't talking consuming booze and operating fighter jets. We are talking security. Yes I take it very serious. But I'm also smart enough to understand...

We aren't talking consuming booze and operating fighter jets. We are talking security. Yes I take it very serious. But I'm also smart enough to understand that people make mistakes. And the best way to learn is from a  mistake. It's part of the sec industry.  Especially in that area. It doesn't matter how smart they are. Everyone is vulnerable.  Dudes made a mistake and learned from it. Not much else can be done. We could fire them and then put someone else in there and it's possible they make a mistake too. I'd rather have the guy that fucked up once and learned then a new guy I would have to worry about. Now if they fuck up a second time - that just means there will be a third. So they would be gone. 

As for how I live my life - all is well. 

. by

 

I agree that mistakes happen. But they all have the same root cause and at one point you should learn from it. Firing the wrong people, publishing wrong numbers, chatting with the wrong people, etc. Those mistakes are as unnecessary as easily avoidable and yet they keep happening, hurting the perception and acception of the administration. They shoot their own foot, hurt their own credibility. Their life could be so much easier if they would just be more professional and thoughtful. Are they incapable to manage that better or do they simply not care?

 

2
2
Airick
Posts
243
Joined
1/27/2017
Location
Hollywood, MD, USA
3/27/2025 2:42am

The fucked part to me is the hypocrisy. All the OPSEC shit we deal with at the lower level, and the consequences we face if we fuck up. But, when the top fools fuck up it’s no big deal.  Just another middle finger to the military and fed employees. 

6
3

Post a reply to: Signal debacle

The Latest