we r starting a riders union

FreshTopEnd
Posts
13254
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
5/3/2010 10:42am
Keep it simple and straight forward. The more issues you take under the mantle, the harder it will be to get agreement.

In a perfect world the people who lay out and build tracks would listen and respond to rider input. For all of the rhetoric in here, it seems to me that what you're after is simply to have the riders be in a position where people with that responsibility will actually have to do so.
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
5/3/2010 10:42am Edited Date/Time 5/3/2010 10:43am
GuyB wrote:
Hang on, I'm going to clean some dumb out of this thread. BRB.
SH_105 wrote:
Leave it, it gives this topic character!!


105
I think this thread is for intelligent discussion on an important topic, not for a couple whack-jobs to vent their not-so-well-thought-out opinions.

Okay, carry on.
Roscoe33
Posts
942
Joined
12/10/2009
Location
London, CA
5/3/2010 10:44am
txrider44 wrote:
What about looking into better helmet technology/testing? Anyone know which helmets McFarlane and Masterpool were wearing?
The old blame game is way off...

This is about the riders having a voice about their own safety....
englishman
Posts
2801
Joined
3/7/2008
Location
England, GB
5/3/2010 10:45am
I'm sure Heinz Kinigardner would be a great guy to talk with as he is very active in rider safety in Europe.

The Shop

MxMouth
Posts
19
Joined
3/23/2009
Location
hemet, CA, USA
5/3/2010 10:48am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 10:35pm
Keep it simple and straight forward. The more issues you take under the mantle, the harder it will be to get agreement. In a perfect world...
Keep it simple and straight forward. The more issues you take under the mantle, the harder it will be to get agreement.

In a perfect world the people who lay out and build tracks would listen and respond to rider input. For all of the rhetoric in here, it seems to me that what you're after is simply to have the riders be in a position where people with that responsibility will actually have to do so.
Which is what they'll have to do at first to make it work...........

Most important issue................ Riders Safety. Get a united front to address track safety and let it grow from that.

txrider44
Posts
267
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
5/3/2010 10:48am
txrider44 wrote:
What about looking into better helmet technology/testing? Anyone know which helmets McFarlane and Masterpool were wearing?
Roscoe33 wrote:
The old blame game is way off...

This is about the riders having a voice about their own safety....
No blame game here. Just crazy that both riders were wearing a fox helmet. You dont think the riders should voice about helmet safety?
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
5/3/2010 10:55am
If you guys want to continue on with that, please take it to another thread. Don't derail this one.
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
5/3/2010 11:20am
GuyB wrote:
I think this thread is for intelligent discussion on an important topic, not for a couple whack-jobs to vent their not-so-well-thought-out opinions.

Okay, carry on.
Um, hello...VitalDrive.....
motomike137
Posts
8180
Joined
4/22/2010
Location
Fenton, MI, USA
5/3/2010 11:23am
Just curious what was at the bottom of the refusal to make adjustments on the tracks. Did they not want to hold up the show while they made the adjustments? It seems that everyone would have to be prepared for slight delays while changes get done. There will be cases where a certain obstacle is just not right or safe from lap 1 of practice and that will be a simpler fix. But when the danger developes over the course of an evening and really presents itself later in the program then all will need to be prepared for speedy and well thought out adjustments. As a fan (a harcore longtime fan) I am ready to back whatever it takes.

GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
5/3/2010 11:27am
In St. Louis, it might have had to do with something as simple as keeping the track the same for the first and second heat races. First gate pick is based on fastest heat race time. Do you give an advantage to one rider over another in that situation? Chad was in the first one.

If Chad had made the same request before or after practice, rather than following the first heat race of the night, would the answer have been the same? I guessing not.
JBR13
Posts
37
Joined
6/15/2009
Location
Lexington Park, MD, USA
5/3/2010 11:35am
I think if it was to keep the jump that way for the second heat race, they could have then changed it for the main events. So I am guessing not too!
5/3/2010 11:37am
JBR13 wrote:
I think if it was to keep the jump that way for the second heat race, they could have then changed it for the main events...
I think if it was to keep the jump that way for the second heat race, they could have then changed it for the main events. So I am guessing not too!
According to someone on here that was right in front of the seciton where Villopoto crashed he said that they did work on the track prior to the lites main event.
motomike137
Posts
8180
Joined
4/22/2010
Location
Fenton, MI, USA
5/3/2010 11:41am
GuyB wrote:
In St. Louis, it might have had to do with something as simple as keeping the track the same for the first and second heat races...
In St. Louis, it might have had to do with something as simple as keeping the track the same for the first and second heat races. First gate pick is based on fastest heat race time. Do you give an advantage to one rider over another in that situation? Chad was in the first one.

If Chad had made the same request before or after practice, rather than following the first heat race of the night, would the answer have been the same? I guessing not.
That makes sense as to why they would not want to do it. That just illustrates one point as to how complicated this could get. We are dealing with very dynamic circumstances when it comes to these tracks (especially a SX track in a open stadium). Then you add in the way the rules are structured it will take a lot of thought and cooperation.
magoo23
Posts
27
Joined
3/1/2010
Location
Lincoln, CA, USA
5/3/2010 11:53am
GuyB wrote:
In St. Louis, it might have had to do with something as simple as keeping the track the same for the first and second heat races...
In St. Louis, it might have had to do with something as simple as keeping the track the same for the first and second heat races. First gate pick is based on fastest heat race time. Do you give an advantage to one rider over another in that situation? Chad was in the first one.

If Chad had made the same request before or after practice, rather than following the first heat race of the night, would the answer have been the same? I guessing not.
I'm guessing there was plenty of time to fix the jump after both heats... During intermission, maybe... With the rider union that SH is working on, the main events may have had a new jump in place. And we, as fans, would maybe be watching RD and RV battle to the end... And on another note, I'm not seeing some of my posts... I'm assuming I was included in your 'whack job' group, and I'll actually take that as a compliment! I'll stick up for the riders, even if their wrong... Anybody who's studied just basic psychology knows that people are followers... But it only takes one to change the path of the group... One dork casting doubt on SHs ideas could cause him to second guess himself and give up, regardless of the scores of others that are supportive... I'll do my part to make sure GL and SH don't have any doubts. Proud to be a whack job!!!
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
5/3/2010 11:57am
magoo23 wrote:
I'm guessing there was plenty of time to fix the jump after both heats... During intermission, maybe... With the rider union that SH is working on...
I'm guessing there was plenty of time to fix the jump after both heats... During intermission, maybe... With the rider union that SH is working on, the main events may have had a new jump in place. And we, as fans, would maybe be watching RD and RV battle to the end... And on another note, I'm not seeing some of my posts... I'm assuming I was included in your 'whack job' group, and I'll actually take that as a compliment! I'll stick up for the riders, even if their wrong... Anybody who's studied just basic psychology knows that people are followers... But it only takes one to change the path of the group... One dork casting doubt on SHs ideas could cause him to second guess himself and give up, regardless of the scores of others that are supportive... I'll do my part to make sure GL and SH don't have any doubts. Proud to be a whack job!!!
If you were quoting someone else, and their message went out with the tide, yours goes, too.

I meant more like the guy who suggested that everyone boycott Vegas. For what? To get this started off on the wrong foot?
5/3/2010 12:05pm
I really hope that they can make this work,but happens when you get a top rider who says he wont ride and then lines up anyway like Emig did at Vegas to get a easy win. will a riders union be able to fine or penalize a rider who breaks from the ranks?
nobhead
Posts
428
Joined
5/14/2008
Location
USA
5/3/2010 12:24pm
GuyB wrote:
In St. Louis, it might have had to do with something as simple as keeping the track the same for the first and second heat races...
In St. Louis, it might have had to do with something as simple as keeping the track the same for the first and second heat races. First gate pick is based on fastest heat race time. Do you give an advantage to one rider over another in that situation? Chad was in the first one.

If Chad had made the same request before or after practice, rather than following the first heat race of the night, would the answer have been the same? I guessing not.
Simple change the track then first in both heats flip a coin for first gate pick. It's better than a broken leg or 9 ribs and lung. The coin works for football.
smc916
Posts
594
Joined
8/9/2007
Location
Hesperia, CA, USA
5/3/2010 12:28pm
lostboy819 wrote:
I really hope that they can make this work,but happens when you get a top rider who says he wont ride and then lines up anyway...
I really hope that they can make this work,but happens when you get a top rider who says he wont ride and then lines up anyway like Emig did at Vegas to get a easy win. will a riders union be able to fine or penalize a rider who breaks from the ranks?
My thoughts exactly.
Hank_Thrill
Posts
4653
Joined
9/22/2008
Location
Arlen, TX, USA
5/3/2010 12:29pm
I'm STOKED!

You guys rule!
chadwik74
Posts
1257
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
CA
5/3/2010 1:06pm
"we r starting a riders union" Dry

Is everyone just overlookin' rule#1 of fight club? No text talk??Huh
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
5/3/2010 1:09pm
Not sure if that one was typed up on his phone or not. Regardless, I think he gets a pass on this one. The message is more important than the infraction.
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13254
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
5/3/2010 1:21pm
Have there been more concerns with the tracks since they dropped the Friday session a couple years ago? I wonder if some of these issues got solved in the past with all parties having more time to get a feel for the track and make adjustments.

That's a serious question.
5/3/2010 1:23pm
Have there been more concerns with the tracks since they dropped the Friday session a couple years ago? I wonder if some of these issues got...
Have there been more concerns with the tracks since they dropped the Friday session a couple years ago? I wonder if some of these issues got solved in the past with all parties having more time to get a feel for the track and make adjustments.

That's a serious question.
That's also a very valid question.
5/3/2010 1:31pm
Have there been more concerns with the tracks since they dropped the Friday session a couple years ago? I wonder if some of these issues got...
Have there been more concerns with the tracks since they dropped the Friday session a couple years ago? I wonder if some of these issues got solved in the past with all parties having more time to get a feel for the track and make adjustments.

That's a serious question.
That's also a very valid question.
A little more time for everyone involved would probably cure most concerns.
Faceaz
Posts
1364
Joined
7/28/2008
Location
Glendale, AZ, USA
5/3/2010 2:12pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 10:35pm
Great to hear GL8, figures it would take a couple foreigners to come here & make some good changes lol.

Obviously safety is you guys main priority, but do you know everything you guys are going to be involved in? It would be awesome if you guys did some sort of major medical & an AFLAC type of thing for members. So often with injuries, we hear of riders not having coverage & if the injury is life changing, they’re left with nothing after. It would be great to see you guys have some help getting back on your feet.
5/3/2010 5:24pm
Bump. This is a great idea. As a privateer that stopped racing in 2005 I can only imagine where I would be now if there was a union. I hope they address the paltry payouts for privateers.
one"O"three
Posts
57
Joined
11/17/2008
Location
Westlake Village, CA, USA
5/3/2010 6:16pm
The promoters have all the face cards in the deck, don't expect them to give any away!

FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
5/3/2010 6:24pm
A riders union is most definitely way overdue in this sport...
Glad to see the top guys stepping up and organizing!
GOOSE
Posts
1
Joined
5/3/2010
Location
Spokane, WA, USA
5/3/2010 6:41pm
This is something that has been talked about lately with the pressing concerns of track design. Let's hope for some movement here.
ridge
Posts
2394
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Apple Valley, CA, USA
5/3/2010 7:08pm
I'm excited that the stars of our sport are doing this. It's about time!

For the record, none of the racers who sat out the 199? Las Vegas SX did so because of the letter which was passed around, certainly not MC. As I understood, Emig was following the boss' orders to race that night, just as the rest of team Yamaha did.

Post a reply to: we r starting a riders union

The Latest