'24 KX 450 Suspension Valving

121x
Posts
196
Joined
3/9/2022
Location
Ontario, CA
Edited Date/Time 4/16/2025 2:42pm

I am looking to purchase a used '24 KX450. I have found one that has been valved for a 200lb vet rider. I am about 240lbs with gear. My concern is that it is going to be too soft. I realize that at my weight, I would need stiffer springs and possibly valving as well, long term. But my understanding is that the stock valving would likely be okay for a 240lb vet c rider, with only springs being necessary.

What I am asking is, would the suspension on this bike valved for a 200lb rider be too soft? I do not want to spend money on suspension work without knowing if I will keep the bike. So trying to determine if I should pass on this one or whether it would be okay to start with.

|
crmx105
Posts
690
Joined
5/7/2016
Location
Dunnellon, FL, USA
7/1/2024 7:20pm

Stock rear spring in the least to light for you and would think the 200lb setup would be closer for your weight than stock. 

1
Brent
Posts
5901
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Temecula, CA, USA
7/1/2024 7:22pm

depending on your skill level, an under-suspended bike will get you into trouble on the track quickly.

Jump kickers alone will get you if the bike is under sprung or incorrectly valved for your weight, and you risk injury if the suspension blows through the stroke.

I own this bike and it was seriously way too soft for my 168 pounds less gear.

If the price on the bike is ok then you will probably need to spend $500 to $1200 getting the suspension set up for your weight, it is a good investment if you jump or ride tracks.   

 

2
1
StillSmokin
Posts
739
Joined
3/18/2022
Location
Edmond, OK, USA
7/1/2024 7:26pm

You will never have correct rebound control when changing springs that much and not fix the valving.

3
121x
Posts
196
Joined
3/9/2022
Location
Ontario, CA
7/1/2024 7:35pm Edited Date/Time 4/16/2025 3:27am

Thanks guys. My understanding was that the stock valving on the KX was actually a bit stiffer, better suited to heavier or faster riders. Trying to determine whether this valving has made the bike closer to what I would need or further away in comparison to how stock would perform for my weight. I would do suspension work if I were to keep the bike.

The Shop

28hall
Posts
312
Joined
4/16/2019
Location
AU
7/2/2024 4:11am

Stock is generally aimed at 180-190 pounds so you would be closer to where you want to be than stock.

1
121x
Posts
196
Joined
3/9/2022
Location
Ontario, CA
7/2/2024 4:30am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2025 3:27am

Thank you! Kind what I was suspecting. I know the rear shock spring stock is way too soft and I have no problem fixing that immediately. That is a given with any bike. I believe the stock fork springs are/were pretty close to where I would need? As mentioned above, if the valving is too soft, obviously that is going to affect overall handling and suspension function. But if I go with this one, I assume it should be good enough for a few hours of easy paced riding to give me a reasonable feel for the bike overall, with the expectation to spend the money to get the suspension dialed in thereafter. 

7/2/2024 4:46am Edited Date/Time 7/2/2024 4:47am

I’m a 215lb winning Vet B motocross racer with a 2024 KX450.  I added oil to both forks and replaced the fork spring in one leg with an optional stiffer OE fork spring.  Out back, I went to a 5.9nm shock spring (which gave me the right amount of static sag), went out half a turn on high speed dampening, and in two or three clicks on rebound dampening (to compensate for the stiffer spring).  With those changes, I don’t feel like I would gain much from a revalve, and I am very happy with my suspension.  
If the one you are looking at was valved and sprung for a 200lb rider, you may need to go stiffer still, but I would doubt that the bike was revalved softer than stock for a customer that big.

1
28hall
Posts
312
Joined
4/16/2019
Location
AU
7/2/2024 4:55am

Fork springs will be too soft as well. I would change springs front and rear which you could do at home and you should be pretty dialed for what your describing. 

1
rpm.15
Posts
58
Joined
12/26/2018
Location
Wenatchee, WA, USA
7/2/2024 5:46am
121x wrote:
I am looking to purchase a used '24 KX450. I have found one that has been valved for a 200lb vet rider. I am about 240lbs...

I am looking to purchase a used '24 KX450. I have found one that has been valved for a 200lb vet rider. I am about 240lbs with gear. My concern is that it is going to be too soft. I realize that at my weight, I would need stiffer springs and possibly valving as well, long term. But my understanding is that the stock valving would likely be okay for a 240lb vet c rider, with only springs being necessary.

What I am asking is, would the suspension on this bike valved for a 200lb rider be too soft? I do not want to spend money on suspension work without knowing if I will keep the bike. So trying to determine if I should pass on this one or whether it would be okay to start with.

I'm 235 pounds. I went .52 on the fork springs 5.9 on the shock, stock valving. My 2024 KX 450 has been good with this set up. I'm a 57 year old intermediate Vet rider. 

1
121x
Posts
196
Joined
3/9/2022
Location
Ontario, CA
7/2/2024 5:58am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2025 3:27am

Very helpful. Thanks a lot guys. Appreciate it!

lumpy790
Posts
11788
Joined
9/18/2007
Location
York, SC, USA
7/2/2024 9:13am

1st find out what springs are on it. It may be as easy as going to a heavier rear spring and a couple clicks stiffer on the rebound to compensate for the spring.

Also ask when was the last time the suspension fluids were changed. I would start with servicing the forks and shock and framing it to grease so you know what you have.

2
ML512
Posts
17068
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA, USA
Fantasy
7/2/2024 10:07am
121x wrote:
Thank you! Kind what I was suspecting. I know the rear shock spring stock is way too soft and I have no problem fixing that immediately...

Thank you! Kind what I was suspecting. I know the rear shock spring stock is way too soft and I have no problem fixing that immediately. That is a given with any bike. I believe the stock fork springs are/were pretty close to where I would need? As mentioned above, if the valving is too soft, obviously that is going to affect overall handling and suspension function. But if I go with this one, I assume it should be good enough for a few hours of easy paced riding to give me a reasonable feel for the bike overall, with the expectation to spend the money to get the suspension dialed in thereafter. 

In stock trim, the forks are softer than the shock on this bike. The rear over powers the front in terms of balance.

2
7/2/2024 2:25pm

57nm rear and 5.4 front with 370ml oil and you are good to go.

1
121x
Posts
196
Joined
3/9/2022
Location
Ontario, CA
7/2/2024 3:23pm Edited Date/Time 4/16/2025 3:27am

Awesome. Thanks guys!

Cdubya
Posts
57
Joined
2/4/2024
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
7/3/2024 12:09pm

Its impossible to know since every suspension tuner has different settings. But stock would work for you with spring changes. Stock valving is good for a C rider. I've taken them apart and know whats inside. 

I have a rider who is a about 5lbs lighter than you. He's running a 5.8 on the rear and .54kg on the forks. You should be fine with a 5.8-6.0 kg rear spring and .54 fork springs.

Also the forks have plenty of reb dampening to handle heavier fork springs. Same with the rear. 

1

Post a reply to: '24 KX 450 Suspension Valving

The Latest