Chad Reed explains it all.

swizcore
Posts
4234
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Fenton, MI, USA
4/21/2010 9:06am
Hey Chad, enjoy fatherhood!
DownSouth
Posts
9943
Joined
7/5/2008
Location
Tallapoosa, GA, USA
4/21/2010 9:25am
Crush wrote:
How correct was his first point!!!! They take away the berms for the small chance that a bike will go up into the stands... But they...
How correct was his first point!!!!

They take away the berms for the small chance that a bike will go up into the stands...

But they keep a dangerous jump that the riders have to jump 20 times in a main...
The flat berm thing has to be a product of Feld's lawyers. The monster jam series (produced by Feld) has had a couple of fans killed over the years from trucks/parts flying into the stands.

Jan 2009 in Tacoma WA http://www.komonews.com/news/37765479.html

Even though only one bike has ended up inthe stands, they are worried about it.

I agree with Chad that they need to think a bit motre about the riders safety as well.

The Shop

4/21/2010 10:01am
good gawd that man can talk alot
BobbyM
Posts
21436
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
4/21/2010 10:03am
bunch a whiney bitchy pooseys on here...know more than the real racers out there no doubt.
4/21/2010 10:10am Edited Date/Time 4/21/2010 10:11am
BobbyM wrote:
bunch a whiney bitchy pooseys on here...know more than the real racers out there no doubt.
If someone doesn't agree with you or a racer then they are a whiney, bitchy poosey? Afuggingmazing. You have a lot of great info but man you can be a complete fucking douche bag more than not.
BobbyM
Posts
21436
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
4/21/2010 10:33am
BobbyM wrote:
bunch a whiney bitchy pooseys on here...know more than the real racers out there no doubt.
If someone doesn't agree with you or a racer then they are a whiney, bitchy poosey? Afuggingmazing. You have a lot of great info but man...
If someone doesn't agree with you or a racer then they are a whiney, bitchy poosey? Afuggingmazing. You have a lot of great info but man you can be a complete fucking douche bag more than not.
no....hell no, just because all the pros agree with me is irrelevent... Wink
4/21/2010 10:44am
BobbyM wrote:
bunch a whiney bitchy pooseys on here...know more than the real racers out there no doubt.
If someone doesn't agree with you or a racer then they are a whiney, bitchy poosey? Afuggingmazing. You have a lot of great info but man...
If someone doesn't agree with you or a racer then they are a whiney, bitchy poosey? Afuggingmazing. You have a lot of great info but man you can be a complete fucking douche bag more than not.
BobbyM wrote:
no....hell no, just because all the pros agree with me is irrelevent... Wink
All the pro's? Who would those pro's be?

It is a misconception and arrogant to think that because a pro rider can race a motorcycle fast that he is right on all aspects of the game.
4/21/2010 10:49am
If someone doesn't agree with you or a racer then they are a whiney, bitchy poosey? Afuggingmazing. You have a lot of great info but man...
If someone doesn't agree with you or a racer then they are a whiney, bitchy poosey? Afuggingmazing. You have a lot of great info but man you can be a complete fucking douche bag more than not.
BobbyM wrote:
no....hell no, just because all the pros agree with me is irrelevent... Wink
All the pro's? Who would those pro's be? It is a misconception and arrogant to think that because a pro rider can race a motorcycle fast...
All the pro's? Who would those pro's be?

It is a misconception and arrogant to think that because a pro rider can race a motorcycle fast that he is right on all aspects of the game.
JT$ I'm pretty sure said the same thing. He said there was also a line of guys saying the same thing.

Here's what I'm gonna say about name calling and all that. If RV comes out and says, the same thing as Chad. And you guys say, still he is wrong, he would have still crashed. I'm gonna agree you are morons. Right now, it's each their own opinion. I'll take the side of Champion Supercrosser's and other pro's who were racing that event.
4/21/2010 10:57am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 10:18pm
BobbyM wrote:
no....hell no, just because all the pros agree with me is irrelevent... Wink
All the pro's? Who would those pro's be? It is a misconception and arrogant to think that because a pro rider can race a motorcycle fast...
All the pro's? Who would those pro's be?

It is a misconception and arrogant to think that because a pro rider can race a motorcycle fast that he is right on all aspects of the game.
JT$ I'm pretty sure said the same thing. He said there was also a line of guys saying the same thing. Here's what I'm gonna say...
JT$ I'm pretty sure said the same thing. He said there was also a line of guys saying the same thing.

Here's what I'm gonna say about name calling and all that. If RV comes out and says, the same thing as Chad. And you guys say, still he is wrong, he would have still crashed. I'm gonna agree you are morons. Right now, it's each their own opinion. I'll take the side of Champion Supercrosser's and other pro's who were racing that event.
A line of guys yet we have only heard from one and you say JT$. I am not sure what you are debating but I am saying he was going to eat shit no matter if that jump was 1 or 2 ft lower. He was not in good shape coming off the jump. Someone pointed out , that as he came off the jump his skid plate threws dirt up. Would you agree that had that happened it would have slowed his momentum and/or kept him from getting the front end up? Also look at his body position as he hits the face of the jump. It looks like he is pushing the bike into it and trying to stay low. If that isn't what he was doing then maybe, just maybe, when his skid plate hit, that force pushed him into that position on the bike.


As for name calling, what type of thought process does someone have that thinks arguing a topic makes you a poosey?
4/21/2010 11:03am Edited Date/Time 4/21/2010 11:05am
A line of guys yet we have only heard from one and you say JT$. I am not sure what you are debating but I am...
A line of guys yet we have only heard from one and you say JT$. I am not sure what you are debating but I am saying he was going to eat shit no matter if that jump was 1 or 2 ft lower. He was not in good shape coming off the jump. Someone pointed out , that as he came off the jump his skid plate threws dirt up. Would you agree that had that happened it would have slowed his momentum and/or kept him from getting the front end up? Also look at his body position as he hits the face of the jump. It looks like he is pushing the bike into it and trying to stay low. If that isn't what he was doing then maybe, just maybe, when his skid plate hit, that force pushed him into that position on the bike.


As for name calling, what type of thought process does someone have that thinks arguing a topic makes you a poosey?
Again, quit changing the size. Chad Reed said 2-3 feet shorter. And, that would also make the landing more rounded being the case.

JT$ is saying a line of riders. So are you calling him a liar?
Overdrive
Posts
1614
Joined
7/13/2008
Location
Fort Myers, FL, USA
4/21/2010 11:08am
Track builder could come out and say yeah we messed up, Rv could say it was a messed up landing ramp. Every pro who raced the track could come out and say it was to dangerous...... In fact a celestial being could pop up and say this jump was too dangerous and these guys would still argue.......
4/21/2010 11:12am
Overdrive wrote:
Track builder could come out and say yeah we messed up, Rv could say it was a messed up landing ramp. Every pro who raced the...
Track builder could come out and say yeah we messed up, Rv could say it was a messed up landing ramp. Every pro who raced the track could come out and say it was to dangerous...... In fact a celestial being could pop up and say this jump was too dangerous and these guys would still argue.......
Sometimes I think they argue, just because they don't want to admit they are wrong. So they look more dumb from it. JHMO
4/21/2010 11:14am Edited Date/Time 4/21/2010 11:15am
All the pro's? Who would those pro's be? It is a misconception and arrogant to think that because a pro rider can race a motorcycle fast...
All the pro's? Who would those pro's be?

It is a misconception and arrogant to think that because a pro rider can race a motorcycle fast that he is right on all aspects of the game.
JT$ I'm pretty sure said the same thing. He said there was also a line of guys saying the same thing. Here's what I'm gonna say...
JT$ I'm pretty sure said the same thing. He said there was also a line of guys saying the same thing.

Here's what I'm gonna say about name calling and all that. If RV comes out and says, the same thing as Chad. And you guys say, still he is wrong, he would have still crashed. I'm gonna agree you are morons. Right now, it's each their own opinion. I'll take the side of Champion Supercrosser's and other pro's who were racing that event.
A line of guys yet we have only heard from one and you say JT$. I am not sure what you are debating but I am...
A line of guys yet we have only heard from one and you say JT$. I am not sure what you are debating but I am saying he was going to eat shit no matter if that jump was 1 or 2 ft lower. He was not in good shape coming off the jump. Someone pointed out , that as he came off the jump his skid plate threws dirt up. Would you agree that had that happened it would have slowed his momentum and/or kept him from getting the front end up? Also look at his body position as he hits the face of the jump. It looks like he is pushing the bike into it and trying to stay low. If that isn't what he was doing then maybe, just maybe, when his skid plate hit, that force pushed him into that position on the bike.


As for name calling, what type of thought process does someone have that thinks arguing a topic makes you a poosey?
wow amazing such stupidity is allowed to live.
4/21/2010 11:22am Edited Date/Time 4/21/2010 11:27am
A line of guys yet we have only heard from one and you say JT$. I am not sure what you are debating but I am...
A line of guys yet we have only heard from one and you say JT$. I am not sure what you are debating but I am saying he was going to eat shit no matter if that jump was 1 or 2 ft lower. He was not in good shape coming off the jump. Someone pointed out , that as he came off the jump his skid plate threws dirt up. Would you agree that had that happened it would have slowed his momentum and/or kept him from getting the front end up? Also look at his body position as he hits the face of the jump. It looks like he is pushing the bike into it and trying to stay low. If that isn't what he was doing then maybe, just maybe, when his skid plate hit, that force pushed him into that position on the bike.


As for name calling, what type of thought process does someone have that thinks arguing a topic makes you a poosey?
Again, quit changing the size. Chad Reed said 2-3 feet shorter. And, that would also make the landing more rounded being the case. JT$ is saying...
Again, quit changing the size. Chad Reed said 2-3 feet shorter. And, that would also make the landing more rounded being the case.

JT$ is saying a line of riders. So are you calling him a liar?
Ok he as going to eat shit if the jump was 2 ft shorter, which is what you originally said. Did Chad say that RV told him he wouldn't have crashed if it was 3 ft lower?


True it would have been more rounded if they had chopped off the feet AND made it more rounded, which they should have done.





What about all the other things in my post or are you going to gloss over them?



You really trying to misconstrue what I said into me calling him a liar? You are searching hard.
4/21/2010 11:26am Edited Date/Time 4/21/2010 11:30am
JT$ I'm pretty sure said the same thing. He said there was also a line of guys saying the same thing. Here's what I'm gonna say...
JT$ I'm pretty sure said the same thing. He said there was also a line of guys saying the same thing.

Here's what I'm gonna say about name calling and all that. If RV comes out and says, the same thing as Chad. And you guys say, still he is wrong, he would have still crashed. I'm gonna agree you are morons. Right now, it's each their own opinion. I'll take the side of Champion Supercrosser's and other pro's who were racing that event.
A line of guys yet we have only heard from one and you say JT$. I am not sure what you are debating but I am...
A line of guys yet we have only heard from one and you say JT$. I am not sure what you are debating but I am saying he was going to eat shit no matter if that jump was 1 or 2 ft lower. He was not in good shape coming off the jump. Someone pointed out , that as he came off the jump his skid plate threws dirt up. Would you agree that had that happened it would have slowed his momentum and/or kept him from getting the front end up? Also look at his body position as he hits the face of the jump. It looks like he is pushing the bike into it and trying to stay low. If that isn't what he was doing then maybe, just maybe, when his skid plate hit, that force pushed him into that position on the bike.


As for name calling, what type of thought process does someone have that thinks arguing a topic makes you a poosey?
Dirt_Dawg wrote:
wow amazing such stupidity is allowed to live.
Thanks for your contribution intellectual giant. I am sure with all of your wisdom you say it was all the landings fault but it was ok every time he hit it prior to that incident.
4/21/2010 11:36am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 10:18pm
Ok he as going to eat shit if the jump was 2 ft shorter, which is what you originally said. Did Chad say that RV told...
Ok he as going to eat shit if the jump was 2 ft shorter, which is what you originally said. Did Chad say that RV told him he wouldn't have crashed if it was 3 ft lower?


True it would have been more rounded if they had chopped off the feet AND made it more rounded, which they should have done.





What about all the other things in my post or are you going to gloss over them?



You really trying to misconstrue what I said into me calling him a liar? You are searching hard.
It sounds like RV told someone inside Kawi that told Chad. We will see if that is the case when RV talks. I've said from the beginning that from what I can tell the bike hit about 2 foot down from the top. And, RV was pushing down on the bike. I actually think he would have hit right at the top with the front wheel if he stayed on. But that wouldn't have been any better. So yes, at 2-3 foot shorter and rounded more to match. He wouldn't have "ate shit"

It does not matter regarding anything other than the landing. I'm sure he did drag. Doesn't negate the fact that the landing was 6 foot tall and it should have been 3 foot tall. Have you ever ridden a supercross track? Different landings have different decisions on when you bail or don't bail. There have been a ton of times riders came up short on a 3-4 foot landing and just case it and ride it out. But when there is a landing that is actually higher than a takeoff, not the case. Plus, RV may not have dragged his frame, which has a skid plate on it, if he didn't have to worry about preloading and jumping so high to clear the 6 foot landing. With the change of that landing, many things would have changed, including how RV took off.
4/21/2010 11:40am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 10:18pm
Ok he as going to eat shit if the jump was 2 ft shorter, which is what you originally said. Did Chad say that RV told...
Ok he as going to eat shit if the jump was 2 ft shorter, which is what you originally said. Did Chad say that RV told him he wouldn't have crashed if it was 3 ft lower?


True it would have been more rounded if they had chopped off the feet AND made it more rounded, which they should have done.





What about all the other things in my post or are you going to gloss over them?



You really trying to misconstrue what I said into me calling him a liar? You are searching hard.
It sounds like RV told someone inside Kawi that told Chad. We will see if that is the case when RV talks. I've said from the...
It sounds like RV told someone inside Kawi that told Chad. We will see if that is the case when RV talks. I've said from the beginning that from what I can tell the bike hit about 2 foot down from the top. And, RV was pushing down on the bike. I actually think he would have hit right at the top with the front wheel if he stayed on. But that wouldn't have been any better. So yes, at 2-3 foot shorter and rounded more to match. He wouldn't have "ate shit"

It does not matter regarding anything other than the landing. I'm sure he did drag. Doesn't negate the fact that the landing was 6 foot tall and it should have been 3 foot tall. Have you ever ridden a supercross track? Different landings have different decisions on when you bail or don't bail. There have been a ton of times riders came up short on a 3-4 foot landing and just case it and ride it out. But when there is a landing that is actually higher than a takeoff, not the case. Plus, RV may not have dragged his frame, which has a skid plate on it, if he didn't have to worry about preloading and jumping so high to clear the 6 foot landing. With the change of that landing, many things would have changed, including how RV took off.
Yep sounds like. Wait and see. I am anxious to hear RV's side of it.

So nothing on the take off, just mid air and the landing? Why do you think he was in the predicament he was in while mid-air?


He would have "eaten shit" had it been 2 or 3 feet shorter IMO.
tlw109
Posts
139
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Picayune, MS, USA
4/21/2010 11:43am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 10:18pm
I think it's funny that everyone knows that he wouldn't have crashed had the jump been shorter. Nobody knows what difference it would have made.

Bunch of damn psychics on this board.
4/21/2010 11:44am
tlw109 wrote:
I think it's funny that everyone knows that he wouldn't have crashed had the jump been shorter. Nobody knows what difference it would have made. Bunch...
I think it's funny that everyone knows that he wouldn't have crashed had the jump been shorter. Nobody knows what difference it would have made.

Bunch of damn psychics on this board.
X2
4/21/2010 11:50am
tlw109 wrote:
I think it's funny that everyone knows that he wouldn't have crashed had the jump been shorter. Nobody knows what difference it would have made. Bunch...
I think it's funny that everyone knows that he wouldn't have crashed had the jump been shorter. Nobody knows what difference it would have made.

Bunch of damn psychics on this board.
X2
Wow, I didn't know Chad Reed was psychic. Freakin cool. He's a Supercross champ and a psychic. You know, cuz he is the one who said RV wouldn't have crashed if the landing was lower.
4/21/2010 11:55am Edited Date/Time 4/21/2010 11:58am
tlw109 wrote:
I think it's funny that everyone knows that he wouldn't have crashed had the jump been shorter. Nobody knows what difference it would have made. Bunch...
I think it's funny that everyone knows that he wouldn't have crashed had the jump been shorter. Nobody knows what difference it would have made.

Bunch of damn psychics on this board.
X2
Wow, I didn't know Chad Reed was psychic. Freakin cool. He's a Supercross champ and a psychic. You know, cuz he is the one who said...
Wow, I didn't know Chad Reed was psychic. Freakin cool. He's a Supercross champ and a psychic. You know, cuz he is the one who said RV wouldn't have crashed if the landing was lower.
And exactly how the hell does he or RV or ANYONE know for sure what would or wouldn't have happened? You keep bypassing the take off aspect of the whole thing. That is where it went bad, not the landing. Did you even bother to read this thread and watch the vid?

http://www.vitalmx.com/...ing-and-crash,897996
4/21/2010 12:09pm Edited Date/Time 4/21/2010 12:10pm
X2
Wow, I didn't know Chad Reed was psychic. Freakin cool. He's a Supercross champ and a psychic. You know, cuz he is the one who said...
Wow, I didn't know Chad Reed was psychic. Freakin cool. He's a Supercross champ and a psychic. You know, cuz he is the one who said RV wouldn't have crashed if the landing was lower.
And exactly how the hell does he or RV or ANYONE know for sure what would or wouldn't have happened? You keep bypassing the take off...
And exactly how the hell does he or RV or ANYONE know for sure what would or wouldn't have happened? You keep bypassing the take off aspect of the whole thing. That is where it went bad, not the landing. Did you even bother to read this thread and watch the vid?

http://www.vitalmx.com/...ing-and-crash,897996
I answered the takeoff issue. If you'd read. second, so RV riding probably a million (exageration) laps and then saying he wouldn't know if he would have crashed or not, is the dumbest shit I've ever read.
4/21/2010 12:13pm
Wow, I didn't know Chad Reed was psychic. Freakin cool. He's a Supercross champ and a psychic. You know, cuz he is the one who said...
Wow, I didn't know Chad Reed was psychic. Freakin cool. He's a Supercross champ and a psychic. You know, cuz he is the one who said RV wouldn't have crashed if the landing was lower.
And exactly how the hell does he or RV or ANYONE know for sure what would or wouldn't have happened? You keep bypassing the take off...
And exactly how the hell does he or RV or ANYONE know for sure what would or wouldn't have happened? You keep bypassing the take off aspect of the whole thing. That is where it went bad, not the landing. Did you even bother to read this thread and watch the vid?

http://www.vitalmx.com/...ing-and-crash,897996
I answered the takeoff issue. If you'd read. second, so RV riding probably a million (exageration) laps and then saying he wouldn't know if he would...
I answered the takeoff issue. If you'd read. second, so RV riding probably a million (exageration) laps and then saying he wouldn't know if he would have crashed or not, is the dumbest shit I've ever read.
More than half of what you post is the dumbest shit I read on here so I might have missed where you talked about the reason he crashed, the take off. Out.
Regis
Posts
2774
Joined
6/17/2008
Location
Gonzales, LA, USA
Fantasy
4/21/2010 12:14pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 10:18pm
tlw109 wrote:
I think it's funny that everyone knows that he wouldn't have crashed had the jump been shorter. Nobody knows what difference it would have made. Bunch...
I think it's funny that everyone knows that he wouldn't have crashed had the jump been shorter. Nobody knows what difference it would have made.

Bunch of damn psychics on this board.
X2
Wow, I didn't know Chad Reed was psychic. Freakin cool. He's a Supercross champ and a psychic. You know, cuz he is the one who said...
Wow, I didn't know Chad Reed was psychic. Freakin cool. He's a Supercross champ and a psychic. You know, cuz he is the one who said RV wouldn't have crashed if the landing was lower.
In the history of SX's, I am willing to bet that we would have had about 50% less crashes if the jumps were shorter, the landings were round, they didn't have whoops and made sure there was no ruts. (sarcasm alert)

Chad Reed was right. It was way dangerous, there is absolutely no arguing that.

My question to all the people that are arguing on the side of blaming the track, Dirt Werx, AMA and anybody else is...

Where do you draw the line? Do you change something whenever anybody complains? OR just Chad Reed, "factory guys"? What if, there is a dangerous section few are doing and one rider doesn't feel comfortable, do you change it becasue that rider doesn't like it?

I wish it were like that because I spent years puckering my ass everytime I went for something I wasn't comfortable doing.

This is a tough argument to have over the internet, because I am all for safety, I am sure NOBODY here on these boards wants to see anyone hurt.. Shit I wish nobody got hurt.... EVER.

I remember hearing at times of problems because a particular factory would complain about something and another would want the obstacle to stay for an advantage. I am willing to bet the Dean Wilson din't mind the obstacle being there since it gave himself a place to pass CP.... Without CP choosing to double Dean may have never had an opportunity to get around him. It's a tough call.
4/21/2010 12:25pm Edited Date/Time 4/21/2010 12:27pm
Regis wrote:
In the history of SX's, I am willing to bet that we would have had about 50% less crashes if the jumps were shorter, the landings...
In the history of SX's, I am willing to bet that we would have had about 50% less crashes if the jumps were shorter, the landings were round, they didn't have whoops and made sure there was no ruts. (sarcasm alert)

Chad Reed was right. It was way dangerous, there is absolutely no arguing that.

My question to all the people that are arguing on the side of blaming the track, Dirt Werx, AMA and anybody else is...

Where do you draw the line? Do you change something whenever anybody complains? OR just Chad Reed, "factory guys"? What if, there is a dangerous section few are doing and one rider doesn't feel comfortable, do you change it becasue that rider doesn't like it?

I wish it were like that because I spent years puckering my ass everytime I went for something I wasn't comfortable doing.

This is a tough argument to have over the internet, because I am all for safety, I am sure NOBODY here on these boards wants to see anyone hurt.. Shit I wish nobody got hurt.... EVER.

I remember hearing at times of problems because a particular factory would complain about something and another would want the obstacle to stay for an advantage. I am willing to bet the Dean Wilson din't mind the obstacle being there since it gave himself a place to pass CP.... Without CP choosing to double Dean may have never had an opportunity to get around him. It's a tough call.
Pretty sure that is why Chad gave some good options on how to fix the problem. Someone who would be the voice of the riders. Again, there were many who went and said that jump was bad, not just Chad. He was just the most outspoken about it. It wasn't about 1 rider. Again.

For the reading impared.
Doesn't negate the fact that the landing was 6 foot tall and it should have been 3 foot tall. Have you ever ridden a supercross track? Different landings have different decisions on when you bail or don't bail. There have been a ton of times riders came up short on a 3-4 foot landing and just case it and ride it out. But when there is a landing that is actually higher than a takeoff, not the case. Plus, RV may not have dragged his frame, which has a skid plate on it, if he didn't have to worry about preloading and jumping so high to clear the 6 foot landing. With the change of that landing, many things would have changed, including how RV took off.
Regis
Posts
2774
Joined
6/17/2008
Location
Gonzales, LA, USA
Fantasy
4/21/2010 1:21pm Edited Date/Time 4/21/2010 1:26pm
Regis wrote:
In the history of SX's, I am willing to bet that we would have had about 50% less crashes if the jumps were shorter, the landings...
In the history of SX's, I am willing to bet that we would have had about 50% less crashes if the jumps were shorter, the landings were round, they didn't have whoops and made sure there was no ruts. (sarcasm alert)

Chad Reed was right. It was way dangerous, there is absolutely no arguing that.

My question to all the people that are arguing on the side of blaming the track, Dirt Werx, AMA and anybody else is...

Where do you draw the line? Do you change something whenever anybody complains? OR just Chad Reed, "factory guys"? What if, there is a dangerous section few are doing and one rider doesn't feel comfortable, do you change it becasue that rider doesn't like it?

I wish it were like that because I spent years puckering my ass everytime I went for something I wasn't comfortable doing.

This is a tough argument to have over the internet, because I am all for safety, I am sure NOBODY here on these boards wants to see anyone hurt.. Shit I wish nobody got hurt.... EVER.

I remember hearing at times of problems because a particular factory would complain about something and another would want the obstacle to stay for an advantage. I am willing to bet the Dean Wilson din't mind the obstacle being there since it gave himself a place to pass CP.... Without CP choosing to double Dean may have never had an opportunity to get around him. It's a tough call.
Pretty sure that is why Chad gave some good options on how to fix the problem. Someone who would be the voice of the riders. Again...
Pretty sure that is why Chad gave some good options on how to fix the problem. Someone who would be the voice of the riders. Again, there were many who went and said that jump was bad, not just Chad. He was just the most outspoken about it. It wasn't about 1 rider. Again.

For the reading impared.
Doesn't negate the fact that the landing was 6 foot tall and it should have been 3 foot tall. Have you ever ridden a supercross track? Different landings have different decisions on when you bail or don't bail. There have been a ton of times riders came up short on a 3-4 foot landing and just case it and ride it out. But when there is a landing that is actually higher than a takeoff, not the case. Plus, RV may not have dragged his frame, which has a skid plate on it, if he didn't have to worry about preloading and jumping so high to clear the 6 foot landing. With the change of that landing, many things would have changed, including how RV took off.
personally, I have never ridden SX. Although...... I did do a track walk one time with Rob Buydos (great guy!) after a friend of mine sold enough Moose tire balls at the local dealer Parts unlimited hooked us up. So I do know what I am talking about as far as track obstacles. I have been there and seen them and no way that landing was 6 feet tall.
Ozy
Posts
2269
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
4/21/2010 1:27pm
Regis, I would think that anybody with an AMA championship should be listened to if they say some element of the track is unsafe
Regis
Posts
2774
Joined
6/17/2008
Location
Gonzales, LA, USA
Fantasy
4/21/2010 1:33pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 10:18pm
Ozy wrote:
Regis, I would think that anybody with an AMA championship should be listened to if they say some element of the track is unsafe
Once again.

Chad Reed was 100% right it was unsafe to triple that section with the third jump being peaked and the take off having ruts.

I mean jesus, who is going to argue with CHAD REED? Seriously, that isn't what I am saying. I think you would have to be retarted to argue with that.

Post a reply to: Chad Reed explains it all.

The Latest