AMA OnlyFans Ban

Broseph
Posts
1213
Joined
4/28/2018
Location
Stevenson, WA, USA
12/28/2023 11:02am
McG194 wrote:
Why does it have to be "fake morality"?  Are you not aware that some people have different values than you? To some people drinking after 21...

Why does it have to be "fake morality"? 

Are you not aware that some people have different values than you? To some people drinking after 21 years old is perfectly fine but they do not approve of porn or nudity at any age. That doesn't make them wrong or fake, it is just their beliefs. 

MX Guy wrote:
You can believe whatever you want, the discussion is about the rule and how it applies to certain sponsors. I don't think involving personal belief makes...

You can believe whatever you want, the discussion is about the rule and how it applies to certain sponsors. I don't think involving personal belief makes an argument more or less relevant, this is a black and white rule that OnlyFans clearly does not violate.

I still don’t get that argument… how is OF different than a brothel? All they do is connect customers to content creators for a fee, right?

1
2
12/28/2023 11:17am
plowboy wrote:
Billy Connolly said, "Times may change but standards must remain". The truth is...just because you need or want money...doesn't mean you should take it from any...

Billy Connolly said, "Times may change but standards must remain".

The truth is...just because you need or want money...doesn't mean you should take it from any quarter.  

Having said that...it's a great big world and it's full of smart and dumb people.  Use your head for more than just keeping your ears apart if you're capable (some folks just ain't got it in them).

Basically,  you either give a fuck about how your actions effect others or you couldn't care less.  Me or us...we all make that decision.  

Surprise....humanity and how we walk through life is no different now than when we climbed out of the ooze or if you prefer...when that snake convinced Eve to try that apple.  

This Billy Connolly? 

By the way, and this may make me look somewhat suspect as a cool guy but I loved the old Tom Snyder show on CBS

 

 

MX Guy
Posts
2693
Joined
7/18/2016
Location
Southern, CA, USA
Fantasy
12/28/2023 11:19am
Broseph wrote:

I still don’t get that argument… how is OF different than a brothel? All they do is connect customers to content creators for a fee, right?

I've never been to a brothel, but I imagine those probably advertise the adult content in which they host (meaning they advertise that they are a brothel), therefor they are different. OnlyFans does not advertise itself as an adult platform. Also, in both instances, nor the brothel or OnlyFans is kidnapping you off the street and forcing you to subject yourself to adult content. Merely seeing the OnlyFans logo on a shroud is not seeing adult content, and going to OnlyFans.com is not seeing adult content. This is why the wording in the rule allows for OnlyFans to operate as a sponsor. 

You are correct that the majority of their content creators use their platform for adult content. That doesn't mean OnlyFans promotes adult content within the platform, per the wording of the rule, they are not in violation.

6
Broseph
Posts
1213
Joined
4/28/2018
Location
Stevenson, WA, USA
12/28/2023 11:25am Edited Date/Time 12/28/2023 11:29am
Broseph wrote:

I still don’t get that argument… how is OF different than a brothel? All they do is connect customers to content creators for a fee, right?

MX Guy wrote:
I've never been to a brothel, but I imagine those probably advertise the adult content in which they host (meaning they advertise that they are a...

I've never been to a brothel, but I imagine those probably advertise the adult content in which they host (meaning they advertise that they are a brothel), therefor they are different. OnlyFans does not advertise itself as an adult platform. Also, in both instances, nor the brothel or OnlyFans is kidnapping you off the street and forcing you to subject yourself to adult content. Merely seeing the OnlyFans logo on a shroud is not seeing adult content, and going to OnlyFans.com is not seeing adult content. This is why the wording in the rule allows for OnlyFans to operate as a sponsor. 

You are correct that the majority of their content creators use their platform for adult content. That doesn't mean OnlyFans promotes adult content within the platform, per the wording of the rule, they are not in violation.

That’s a rational argument and I appreciate the civility. I don’t agree with it because I don’t think Onlyfans is paying Logan to promote their homepage. But I could be wrong. 
 

A brothel logo is also not exposure to adult content. But we all know what they’re selling. They should be allowed as well, right?

2

The Shop

GrapeApe
Posts
8934
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX, USA
12/28/2023 11:30am
JM485 wrote:

IMG 1093 0.jpeg?VersionId=0ws1ME3vcBTnD7S6NAAEd

yak651 wrote:

💯 Paging magoofan to the courtesy phone…please comment on how you called ol Bob out on his antics….

LungButter wrote:

Bump

"You see son, that's called a mustache ride. Don't tell your mother."

Remote image

 

11
1
Magoofan
Posts
10401
Joined
5/4/2021
Location
Shadow Glen (for those who remember), CA, USA
12/28/2023 11:36am
Chance1216 wrote:
Probably my favorite era of SX.  Even Casper would agree. 

Probably my favorite era of SX. 
F547E3AB-9973-4F35-A382-FAAFD067CD17
Even Casper would agree. 

C2AF4A02-0D74-45FE-AB48-87637CBD4255

Mine too.   It was the best era.

I run a Camel SX sticker on my panniers....   (...and no, I've never smoked a day in my life, disgusting/filthy/unhealthy habit)

image-20231228113522-1

1
3
Gworm
Posts
2813
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
12/28/2023 11:38am
GrapeApe wrote:
"You see son, that's called a mustache ride. Don't tell your mother."  

"You see son, that's called a mustache ride. Don't tell your mother."

Remote image

 

Is her cooter close to her belly button??

 

3
2
MX Guy
Posts
2693
Joined
7/18/2016
Location
Southern, CA, USA
Fantasy
12/28/2023 11:40am
Broseph wrote:
That’s a rational argument and I appreciate the civility. I don’t agree with it because I don’t think Onlyfans is paying Logan to promote their homepage...

That’s a rational argument and I appreciate the civility. I don’t agree with it because I don’t think Onlyfans is paying Logan to promote their homepage. But I could be wrong. 
 

A brothel logo is also not exposure to adult content. But we all know what they’re selling. They should be allowed as well, right?

Per the wording of the rule, yes. As long as there is no explicit advertisement from the company itself, they are allowed to operate as a sponsor. 

dang472
Posts
618
Joined
6/26/2014
Location
Kingston, IL, USA
Fantasy
12/28/2023 11:42am

IMG 7673

12
plowboy
Posts
14553
Joined
1/3/2010
Location
Norwich, KS, USA
12/28/2023 11:42am
This Billy Connolly?  By the way, and this may make me look somewhat suspect as a cool guy but I loved the old Tom Snyder show...

This Billy Connolly? 

By the way, and this may make me look somewhat suspect as a cool guy but I loved the old Tom Snyder show on CBS

 

 

Snyder was a straight shooter.  Loved his show.  

1
1
Broseph
Posts
1213
Joined
4/28/2018
Location
Stevenson, WA, USA
12/28/2023 11:50am
Broseph wrote:
That’s a rational argument and I appreciate the civility. I don’t agree with it because I don’t think Onlyfans is paying Logan to promote their homepage...

That’s a rational argument and I appreciate the civility. I don’t agree with it because I don’t think Onlyfans is paying Logan to promote their homepage. But I could be wrong. 
 

A brothel logo is also not exposure to adult content. But we all know what they’re selling. They should be allowed as well, right?

MX Guy wrote:
Per the wording of the rule, yes. As long as there is no explicit advertisement from the company itself, they are allowed to operate as a...

Per the wording of the rule, yes. As long as there is no explicit advertisement from the company itself, they are allowed to operate as a sponsor. 

Well I guess that’s where we disagree. 

I believe the nature of their revenue stream is enough to label both OF and a brothel “adult related content” and disqualify them per the rule.

4
3
MX Guy
Posts
2693
Joined
7/18/2016
Location
Southern, CA, USA
Fantasy
12/28/2023 11:54am
Broseph wrote:
Well I guess that’s where we disagree.  I believe the nature of their revenue stream is enough to label both OF and a brothel “adult related...

Well I guess that’s where we disagree. 

I believe the nature of their revenue stream is enough to label both OF and a brothel “adult related content” and disqualify them per the rule.

Then you don’t understand the rule. 

3
Broseph
Posts
1213
Joined
4/28/2018
Location
Stevenson, WA, USA
12/28/2023 12:01pm Edited Date/Time 12/28/2023 12:03pm
Broseph wrote:
Well I guess that’s where we disagree.  I believe the nature of their revenue stream is enough to label both OF and a brothel “adult related...

Well I guess that’s where we disagree. 

I believe the nature of their revenue stream is enough to label both OF and a brothel “adult related content” and disqualify them per the rule.

MX Guy wrote:

Then you don’t understand the rule. 

Would you mind explaining it then? Particularly the part where a brothel is not “related to adult content”?

2
McG194
Posts
4126
Joined
9/7/2017
Location
Palm Coast, FL, USA
12/28/2023 12:04pm
McG194 wrote:
Why does it have to be "fake morality"?  Are you not aware that some people have different values than you? To some people drinking after 21...

Why does it have to be "fake morality"? 

Are you not aware that some people have different values than you? To some people drinking after 21 years old is perfectly fine but they do not approve of porn or nudity at any age. That doesn't make them wrong or fake, it is just their beliefs. 

MX Guy wrote:
You can believe whatever you want, the discussion is about the rule and how it applies to certain sponsors. I don't think involving personal belief makes...

You can believe whatever you want, the discussion is about the rule and how it applies to certain sponsors. I don't think involving personal belief makes an argument more or less relevant, this is a black and white rule that OnlyFans clearly does not violate.

The discussion has gone way off the rails. Some people are making the stretch that if you are ok with cigs and drink you have to be ok with sex. I was just adding that everyone has a moral line. If you notice I didn't mention where mine was. I don't subscribe to any OF girls because I'm not a simp and I'm well aware that there is plenty of free porn on the web. I also don't have any kids to raise and guide their morality, I just look at it all from an interested observer. 

2
LungButter
Posts
8684
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID, USA
12/28/2023 12:04pm
Gworm wrote:

Is her cooter close to her belly button??

 

Ok then, so we are talking a lot about what is "implied" in this thread it seems....so what exactly was Mr. Hannah trying to do in this photo since you are implying he wasn't pretending to eat her pussy?

2
MX Guy
Posts
2693
Joined
7/18/2016
Location
Southern, CA, USA
Fantasy
12/28/2023 12:17pm
Broseph wrote:

Would you mind explaining it then? Particularly the part where a brothel is not “related to adult content”?

image-20231228120947-1

These stipulations act as the definition of the term "related to," there is no reason that you should be leaving that up to your own interpretation when the guidelines are clearly stated.

OnlyFans as a sponsor, meaning the company itself, abides by all of these stipulations. Therefor, they are allowed. Any company that abides by all of these stipulations would also be allowed to operate as a sponsor. 

2
Magoofan
Posts
10401
Joined
5/4/2021
Location
Shadow Glen (for those who remember), CA, USA
12/28/2023 12:29pm
Gworm wrote:

Is her cooter close to her belly button??

 

Exactly.

The Hannah thing was such a ridiculously weak argument, it didn't even warrant a response to legitimatize it.   

There is racier action in the Dirty Dancing movie clubhouse dancing scene.

I'm not condoning what Hannah did either...

 

Nobody in their right mind is fooled by what is being promoted.  Even the announcers last year were giggling and making comments (wink wink) about karnow and his sponsor.   I can't remember if it was Weege, RC or another pair.

 

10
Broseph
Posts
1213
Joined
4/28/2018
Location
Stevenson, WA, USA
12/28/2023 12:32pm
Broseph wrote:

Would you mind explaining it then? Particularly the part where a brothel is not “related to adult content”?

MX Guy wrote:
These stipulations act as the definition of the term "related to," there is no reason that you should be leaving that up to your own interpretation...

image-20231228120947-1

These stipulations act as the definition of the term "related to," there is no reason that you should be leaving that up to your own interpretation when the guidelines are clearly stated.

OnlyFans as a sponsor, meaning the company itself, abides by all of these stipulations. Therefor, they are allowed. Any company that abides by all of these stipulations would also be allowed to operate as a sponsor. 

Well we disagree again. Onlyfans is not a social media platform. It’s an online broker that sells 98% adult content. If that’s not considered “adult related” then I don’t know what is. 

2
12/28/2023 12:34pm

Isnt this Ward Robinson with the Old Milwaukee and Billy Keefe smiling in the background?

LungButter
Posts
8684
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID, USA
12/28/2023 12:38pm Edited Date/Time 12/28/2023 1:05pm
Magoofan wrote:
Exactly. The Hannah thing was such a ridiculously weak argument, it didn't even warrant a response to legitimatize it.    There is racier action in the...

Exactly.

The Hannah thing was such a ridiculously weak argument, it didn't even warrant a response to legitimatize it.   

There is racier action in the Dirty Dancing movie clubhouse dancing scene.

I'm not condoning what Hannah did either...

 

Nobody in their right mind is fooled by what is being promoted.  Even the announcers last year were giggling and making comments (wink wink) about karnow and his sponsor.   I can't remember if it was Weege, RC or another pair.

 

Why did Hannah pick her up like that if it wasn't to pretend he was eating her pussy?

I can hear you lying to your kid right now....

"Daddy, why did Mr. Bob pick her up like that?"

"To kiss her belly button son."

 

1
3
12/28/2023 12:52pm

If the gay Suzuki rider was still racing I bet he could secure a vape sponsorship.

3
MX Guy
Posts
2693
Joined
7/18/2016
Location
Southern, CA, USA
Fantasy
12/28/2023 12:52pm
Broseph wrote:
Well we disagree again. Onlyfans is not a social media platform. It’s an online broker that sells 98% adult content. If that’s not considered “adult related”...

Well we disagree again. Onlyfans is not a social media platform. It’s an online broker that sells 98% adult content. If that’s not considered “adult related” then I don’t know what is. 

I'm not here to argue with you, I'm explaining what the reality is, and this isn't an opinion based discussion, even though you're refusing to let go of making it one. If you refuse to accept factual information then I see no reason to keep wasting my time. 

Broseph
Posts
1213
Joined
4/28/2018
Location
Stevenson, WA, USA
12/28/2023 1:00pm Edited Date/Time 12/28/2023 1:10pm
Broseph wrote:
Well we disagree again. Onlyfans is not a social media platform. It’s an online broker that sells 98% adult content. If that’s not considered “adult related”...

Well we disagree again. Onlyfans is not a social media platform. It’s an online broker that sells 98% adult content. If that’s not considered “adult related” then I don’t know what is. 

MX Guy wrote:
I'm not here to argue with you, I'm explaining what the reality is, and this isn't an opinion based discussion, even though you're refusing to let...

I'm not here to argue with you, I'm explaining what the reality is, and this isn't an opinion based discussion, even though you're refusing to let go of making it one. If you refuse to accept factual information then I see no reason to keep wasting my time. 

Reality? The reality is they’re an online adult content broker and therefore their sponsorship is “related to adult content” and this makes them ineligible per the rules until that wording is changed. 

1
7
LungButter
Posts
8684
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID, USA
12/28/2023 1:03pm
Broseph wrote:
Reality? The reality is they’re an online adult content broker and therefore their sponsorship is “related to adult content” and this makes them ineligible per the...

Reality? The reality is they’re an online adult content broker and therefore their sponsorship is “related to adult content” and this makes them ineligible per the rules until that wording is changed. 

That's not reality.

Reality is that Karnow will be lining up at A1 with OnlyFans graphics.....so, you're wrong, that's reality.

6
2
Broseph
Posts
1213
Joined
4/28/2018
Location
Stevenson, WA, USA
12/28/2023 1:08pm
Broseph wrote:
Reality? The reality is they’re an online adult content broker and therefore their sponsorship is “related to adult content” and this makes them ineligible per the...

Reality? The reality is they’re an online adult content broker and therefore their sponsorship is “related to adult content” and this makes them ineligible per the rules until that wording is changed. 

LungButter wrote:

That's not reality.

Reality is that Karnow will be lining up at A1 with OnlyFans graphics.....so, you're wrong, that's reality.

Well you’re right. Selective rule enforcement is reality. 
 

2
LungButter
Posts
8684
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID, USA
12/28/2023 1:12pm
Broseph wrote:

Well you’re right. Selective rule enforcement is reality. 
 

We can agree on that.  That's the AMA we know and love.

2
Gworm
Posts
2813
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
12/28/2023 1:14pm
Gworm wrote:

Is her cooter close to her belly button??

 

LungButter wrote:
Ok then, so we are talking a lot about what is "implied" in this thread it seems....so what exactly was Mr. Hannah trying to do in...

Ok then, so we are talking a lot about what is "implied" in this thread it seems....so what exactly was Mr. Hannah trying to do in this photo since you are implying he wasn't pretending to eat her pussy?

LungButter
Posts
8684
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID, USA
12/28/2023 1:16pm

Give me a break....there is absolutely zero chance you actually truly think that's what he was doing and we all know that Bob would think you guys were fucking pussies for thinking he was trying to do anything other than chow that box.

But kudos for going the extra mile to keep your argument going.

 

3
2
Gworm
Posts
2813
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
12/28/2023 1:23pm
Magoofan wrote:
Mav....love ya man.  ;) ...but nobody is fooled by what is being promoted.    Straight from the horses ass.... [img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/stories/2022/10/20/max_karnow2_744790.jpg?1666322940[/img]    

Mav....love ya man.  Wink

...but nobody is fooled by what is being promoted.   

Straight from the horses ass....

 

If all of the girls are as ugly as this one, how are they making any money?

early
Posts
10016
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
12/28/2023 1:23pm

If you go on "The official Twitter page of Monster Energy Supercross" this is what you'll find, just saying.

Screenshot 20231228 161613 Chrome 0.jpg?VersionId=5IcRVMpuhAXNPWjfY0KY9VPOD.2

Screenshot 20231228 161536 Chrome 0.jpg?VersionId=NHmyeevVm7PJmuaoQQhmHnI6Y

Screenshot 20231228 161502 Chrome.jpg?VersionId=aUSzzLoVUeVnV.

1
3

Post a reply to: AMA OnlyFans Ban

The Latest