Has anyone been reading the new rules ?

500guy
Posts
12468
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
Edited Date/Time 1/27/2012 9:01am
Here's a little sample

1. Champions may ride either region the following year but must only compete with the no. 1 plate when defending in the region in which they won the Championship. 2. A rider that wins a Supercross Lites Championship will be eligible to participate in the Supercross Lites class for a maximum of three years total regardless of what year he/she won the title. (i.e. if a rider wins the Championship in their third year of Supercross Lites competition, they will be ineligible for the Supercross Lites class regardless of points and therefore not eligible to defend their Supercross Lites Championship title) 3. After a rider wins a second Championship, in either region, the rider will be ineligible for the Supercross Lites class, regardless of points or number of years in class. g. Riders who are advanced to the Supercross class through points or Championships won will not be eligible to return to the Supercross Lites class.
|
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
11/25/2009 11:50am
Amateur rules in pro racing is stupid

It's either a pro class or it isn't


txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX, USA
11/25/2009 11:54am
flarider wrote:
Amateur rules in pro racing is stupid

It's either a pro class or it isn't


why is it stupid? It's a regional class...kind of in between the am and pro...
jbomx363
Posts
2008
Joined
9/4/2007
Location
Denham Springs, LA, USA
11/25/2009 12:00pm
I like em.
500guy
Posts
12468
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
11/25/2009 12:04pm
flarider wrote:
Amateur rules in pro racing is stupid

It's either a pro class or it isn't


There is a bunch of new technical stuff that will limit the factories modifying frames ect.

I haven't waded through it all, I will post a few things I see when I can.

I agree on AM rules but if that's the case make the 250F's run all 16 rounds

The Shop

flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
11/25/2009 12:10pm Edited Date/Time 11/25/2009 12:14pm
flarider wrote:
Amateur rules in pro racing is stupid

It's either a pro class or it isn't


txmxer wrote:
why is it stupid? It's a regional class...kind of in between the am and pro...
Because it is a pro class.

Shall we now have Pro A, Pro B and Pro C classes?

It's either a pro class or it isn't. This concept of pointing out of a pro class is stupid, period.

In all other forms of racing, a pro racer can move between divisions freely, because they're all PRO CLASSES.

A driver in NASCAR Cup can drive in the Nationwide (former Busch) or Camping World Trucks series...can race all three the same weekend if he wants

MotoGP rider could go race WSBK or any other series without restriction

Jeff Gordon could race a saturday night dirt track at the local fairgrounds if he wanted.

AMA hurts itself and the riders in the class by treating it like some amateur division where riders point out. It should be open to anyone, on their way up or their way down. All they're doing is building a cliff and shortening careers of riders. Not everyone can get a ride or excel on big bikes, some specialize on smaller bikes. With this rule, once you can't get a ride in the big class, your career is over, there is no where else to go...all the did is build a staircase that ends at a cliff....ending careers

It's bogus amateur rules in pro racing and it is stupid
Holigan
Posts
1448
Joined
6/18/2008
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
11/25/2009 12:21pm
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening where James won two Heats and both Mains.
500guy
Posts
12468
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
11/25/2009 12:23pm
Holigan wrote:
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening...
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening where James won two Heats and both Mains.
Can't double class
Holigan
Posts
1448
Joined
6/18/2008
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
11/25/2009 12:26pm
I like the new rules. The 450's (the premier class) will have better racing if they move the fast guys up.

Plus new riders will have a better chance of success if they are not having to line up at their first SX against guys that have been racing Lites for five or more years.
11/25/2009 12:27pm
flarider wrote:
Amateur rules in pro racing is stupid

It's either a pro class or it isn't


txmxer wrote:
why is it stupid? It's a regional class...kind of in between the am and pro...
flarider wrote:
Because it is a pro class.Shall we now have Pro A, Pro B and Pro C classes?It's either a pro class or it isn't. This concept...
Because it is a pro class.

Shall we now have Pro A, Pro B and Pro C classes?

It's either a pro class or it isn't. This concept of pointing out of a pro class is stupid, period.

In all other forms of racing, a pro racer can move between divisions freely, because they're all PRO CLASSES.

A driver in NASCAR Cup can drive in the Nationwide (former Busch) or Camping World Trucks series...can race all three the same weekend if he wants

MotoGP rider could go race WSBK or any other series without restriction

Jeff Gordon could race a saturday night dirt track at the local fairgrounds if he wanted.

AMA hurts itself and the riders in the class by treating it like some amateur division where riders point out. It should be open to anyone, on their way up or their way down. All they're doing is building a cliff and shortening careers of riders. Not everyone can get a ride or excel on big bikes, some specialize on smaller bikes. With this rule, once you can't get a ride in the big class, your career is over, there is no where else to go...all the did is build a staircase that ends at a cliff....ending careers

It's bogus amateur rules in pro racing and it is stupid
I agree 100%.
newmann
Posts
24437
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/25/2009 12:28pm
Yes, it's stupid. That's one of the points where the 125 class needs to make a comeback. Keep it regional and limit the age. The 250F's are well beyond a level of professionalism that should have them continue to be treated like a bunch of heathens.
dirthead1
Posts
1440
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Southern, CA, USA
11/25/2009 12:28pm
Holigan wrote:
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening...
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening where James won two Heats and both Mains.
I would like to see him try that.
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
11/25/2009 12:29pm
Holigan wrote:
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening...
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening where James won two Heats and both Mains.
I think a rider should be able to double class if he wants.
JT$ used to do it

Teams won't want a top guy doing it for risk of injury in the SX2 and screwing up his ride in the SX1 class
dirthead1
Posts
1440
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Southern, CA, USA
11/25/2009 12:31pm
Holigan wrote:
I like the new rules. The 450's (the premier class) will have better racing if they move the fast guys up. Plus new riders will have...
I like the new rules. The 450's (the premier class) will have better racing if they move the fast guys up.

Plus new riders will have a better chance of success if they are not having to line up at their first SX against guys that have been racing Lites for five or more years.
Then they race the 450
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13361
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
11/25/2009 12:31pm
Holigan wrote:
I like the new rules. The 450's (the premier class) will have better racing if they move the fast guys up. Plus new riders will have...
I like the new rules. The 450's (the premier class) will have better racing if they move the fast guys up.

Plus new riders will have a better chance of success if they are not having to line up at their first SX against guys that have been racing Lites for five or more years.
All the fast guys need to be in one class. I don't care what size bike they're riding.
BobbyM
Posts
21435
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
11/25/2009 12:35pm
Holigan wrote:
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening...
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening where James won two Heats and both Mains.
do you really think james could win the lites class? Wink
BobbyM
Posts
21435
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
11/25/2009 12:38pm
Holigan wrote:
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening...
But if they are both equal pro classes, James and others could ride Lites as well. How would you like to set through a SX evening where James won two Heats and both Mains.
flarider wrote:
I think a rider should be able to double class if he wants. JT$ used to do it Teams won't want a top guy doing it...
I think a rider should be able to double class if he wants.
JT$ used to do it

Teams won't want a top guy doing it for risk of injury in the SX2 and screwing up his ride in the SX1 class
I AGREEEEEE!!!
jbomx363
Posts
2008
Joined
9/4/2007
Location
Denham Springs, LA, USA
11/25/2009 12:39pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 7:08pm
Ha.. I've been wanting to say this for a long long time.


Come up with a better system Dave and break it out how each rider would benefit from your system, how the fan would benefit, and how the teams would benefit.


As been said many a time, MX/SX is a sport like no other. Comparing how other sports do their pro ranks just isn't the same thing.

TeamGreen
Posts
37803
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
11/25/2009 12:42pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 7:08pm
This is all part of the move the AMA started a few years ago to establish some form of heirarchy/chronolgy to the classes and the entire Pro-Racing program...

You know...go thru the AX series to get to the SX series...etc. SX is an "Endorsement" on a Pro-MX license...etc. All of which get's trumped by various "letters of rec", etc.

Whatever happened to all that, anyways?
11/25/2009 12:48pm
Funny thing about the rule. They can kick you out of the 250f class but do they make you earn a spot in the 450 class? If they can kick you out of the 250f class it makes no sense that you can skip it and go straight to 450s.

Also, I can really see this shortening some careers before they ever get started. They make the rule you have to be 18 before you can race pro, then you can only race the entrance class for 3 years.

I can see some careers going like this. 1st year learning curve, 2nd year injured after 3 rounds 3rd year hit and miss mid pack. 4th year... wheres my 450 ride..... see ya.
As an example, what would a champion like Ivan Tedesco have become if he had rules like this to contend? He would have never gotten his opportunity at PC to succeed the way he did. He would have already been out of the class.
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
11/25/2009 12:58pm
jbomx363 wrote:
Ha.. I've been wanting to say this for a long long time. Come up with a better system Dave and break it out how each rider...
Ha.. I've been wanting to say this for a long long time.


Come up with a better system Dave and break it out how each rider would benefit from your system, how the fan would benefit, and how the teams would benefit.


As been said many a time, MX/SX is a sport like no other. Comparing how other sports do their pro ranks just isn't the same thing.

Simple.

Riders on their way up can race experienced vets who may be on their way down. Those vets may not have the speed to run up front in the SX1 class, but have the speed in the SX2 class.

The fan benefits by being able to see and cheer on their favorite rider for a longer period of time, as he rises through the ranks, peaks and is on the way down.

Experienced wily vets against less experienced rookies can make for great racing as well as show for the fans

Teams can benefit by getting name riders with fan following on their SX2 teams, garnering more attention and therefore additional sponsor dollars.

and finally, this system is a dead end system for the pro rider, as once he points out he has no where else to go, so once that rider is no longer a front runner or competitive in SX1 and cannot get a ride, his career is over, done.
Is that right?
To toss aside riders like chum on a shark fishing expedition?

Allowing riders to chose the division they can get a ride in and/or be competitive in benefits the rider, teams, fans, sponsors and other racers.

txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX, USA
11/25/2009 1:01pm
Both FTE and Newmann make great points. A 125 class and getting the fastest racers into the premier class.

If we had 100 SX riders that were truly competitive, I would be all for having two national classes. We don't. You make it national and now you've cut out 40 or so riders from ever having a chance to race SX.

The career issue cuts both ways.
The Rock
Posts
8758
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI, USA
11/25/2009 4:43pm
500guy wrote:
There is a bunch of new technical stuff that will limit the factories modifying frames ect. I haven't waded through it all, I will post a...
There is a bunch of new technical stuff that will limit the factories modifying frames ect.

I haven't waded through it all, I will post a few things I see when I can.

I agree on AM rules but if that's the case make the 250F's run all 16 rounds
When did they start allowing the factories (or anyone) to modify frames?
Sunhouse
Posts
3674
Joined
3/2/2009
Location
NO
11/25/2009 4:57pm
It´s a great idea! Make it or break it! Should make mini parents think twice about homeschooling! I guess they aren´t real pros before they enter the 450 class with this rule
TerryB
Posts
2840
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Cambridge, MN, USA
11/25/2009 5:00pm
flarider wrote:
Because it is a pro class.Shall we now have Pro A, Pro B and Pro C classes?It's either a pro class or it isn't. This concept...
Because it is a pro class.

Shall we now have Pro A, Pro B and Pro C classes?

It's either a pro class or it isn't. This concept of pointing out of a pro class is stupid, period.

In all other forms of racing, a pro racer can move between divisions freely, because they're all PRO CLASSES.

A driver in NASCAR Cup can drive in the Nationwide (former Busch) or Camping World Trucks series...can race all three the same weekend if he wants

MotoGP rider could go race WSBK or any other series without restriction

Jeff Gordon could race a saturday night dirt track at the local fairgrounds if he wanted.

AMA hurts itself and the riders in the class by treating it like some amateur division where riders point out. It should be open to anyone, on their way up or their way down. All they're doing is building a cliff and shortening careers of riders. Not everyone can get a ride or excel on big bikes, some specialize on smaller bikes. With this rule, once you can't get a ride in the big class, your career is over, there is no where else to go...all the did is build a staircase that ends at a cliff....ending careers

It's bogus amateur rules in pro racing and it is stupid
Damn, Dave, you're being way to logical and easy to agree with lately...
adamdf
Posts
2132
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
St. Michael, BB
11/25/2009 5:15pm
flarider wrote:
Amateur rules in pro racing is stupid

It's either a pro class or it isn't


txmxer wrote:
why is it stupid? It's a regional class...kind of in between the am and pro...
So your saying Mitch Payton hires a bunch of "semi-pros" to go after his titles? No way and you know that. I agree with FLarider, and also 500guy is right, they should just run 16 rounds now, there really are hardly any "true privateers" left in the class anyway. In fact there are probably more privateers trying to qualify for the 450 class just because a 450 is cheaper to run.
DAG
Posts
216
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Mooresville, NC, USA
11/25/2009 5:16pm
I think the main issue here is that there are no enough teams for all the riders to ride with. I do not know the total payback amounts lately for not making the show so don't beat me up too much for it.What I do know is that a privateer cannot have a job doing it on their own with the way the money is distributed. It seems to me that the series should have a higher point fund so that you could have more riders able to make a living in the 450 class. That way pointing out isn't a big deal and the cliff goes away. Supercross still seems ridiculus to me that riders in the last chance get $200 for their troubles for an entire nights work. Surely with all the ticket sales and Tv contracts there should be more money available for the lower riders. Last time I saw a main event win was $5000. That is absurd!
oldx
Posts
3046
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Camano Island, WA, USA
11/25/2009 5:26pm
flarider wrote:
Amateur rules in pro racing is stupid

It's either a pro class or it isn't


X2
zippy895
Posts
5495
Joined
7/15/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
11/25/2009 5:36pm
lites 'pro ' should run all rounds,mixed in with freshman,sophmore,junior,senior riders.
pros go for a yearlong title,all others east or west title as up and comers.if they earn enough points by the time they reach senior'4th yr.',they are put into the pro lites or 450 class .
simple.
pro lites
pro 450
pro /am...east and west titles(max 4 years limit)only for am. grads.
same starting line w/ pro lites
Ing
Posts
3654
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Spring Hill, FL, USA
11/25/2009 5:39pm
Open up both classes and run 16 races in both classes. Why complicate it?.
creed
Posts
171
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/25/2009 5:45pm
I don't agree with the riders having to move up regardless of results after 3 years, this is a Pro class and should be treated like one.
Just bring in the 125cc class for 16 to 18 years eg u/19 like in Australia.
A lot of riders don't seem to get it together till early 20's while others are burnt out or reach their full potential by the time they are 21.
An extra class and keep bikes as stock and lets Go Racing, who wouldn't want to see more racing at a SX event.
I see the Riders getting jammed up the ass once again.

I can't wait till the AMA move to having different racing programs like the SX in Australia.
Jeremy wanted to change this a few years back and I am sure even BOBBY M will vote for it once he gets to see the LIVE 2 hr packages. It is freakin Insane, I am old but I get So Excited I even told my 5 yr old daughter to call 000 for an Ambo if I go down.

Post a reply to: Has anyone been reading the new rules ?

The Latest