Federal Trump Indictment

Gworm
Posts
2785
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
6/19/2023 5:09am
Robgvx wrote:

 

So Trump had access and possibly retains privilege regarding classified information that Biden didn’t have until recent and Clinton has never had.    Hope he gets...

So Trump had access and possibly retains privilege regarding classified information that Biden didn’t have until recent and Clinton has never had. 
 

Hope he gets the chance to hold them accountable.

Robgvx wrote:
They’re not the people with an indictment hanging over them (and not the subject of this thread). That said, if they’re guilty, indict them. The rules...

They’re not the people with an indictment hanging over them (and not the subject of this thread).

That said, if they’re guilty, indict them. The rules are straightforward, as your man in the video has made quite clear.  Present the evidence (like Jack Smith has) and throw the book at them.

This argument reminds me of the children’s song “ there’s a hole in the bucket, dear Liza” it just keeps going in circles. 

The whole point is, there IS much more damning evidence on both Hillary and Joe, Comey actually admitted it and then said that no reasonable prosecutor would file charges because there was no intent, when Hillary destroyed emails that were subpoenad, and destroys evidence with bleachbit and hammers! No intent! BS!

The left keeps saying,” If they are guilty they should be charged, too”. The point is there IS evidence and they ARE guilty,  but no charges. 


 

3
6
early
Posts
9914
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
6/19/2023 5:54am Edited Date/Time 6/19/2023 6:41am
It’s complicated and no one is asking you to ignore the history.  But, redemption is an important part of American culture. It allows us to start...

It’s complicated and no one is asking you to ignore the history.  But, redemption is an important part of American culture. It allows us to start over, accept others, be accepted.  If it isn’t attainable we have a huge problem 

They didn’t  invent slavery, every culture had it. The difference is they should have been better and what they did and the war proved the Declaration of Independence right, it ended slavery  It was an important step  

They were forgiven. 

early wrote:
The fact that there was blatant segregation 100 years after the war that southerners (as well as whites all over the county) fought hard to keep...

The fact that there was blatant segregation 100 years after the war that southerners (as well as whites all over the county) fought hard to keep tells me they weren't at all sorry for having slaves, causing a civil war, and fostering a 2 tiered society. Redemption is earned.

The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 and England freed their slaves in the 1830s so abolition in the zeitgeist for a while before the first shots were fired at Ft Sumter. Southerners knew what they had. Even if only 25% of southerners owned slaves they had nearly 100% support from the rest of those states white populations.

We’re talking about slavery but you are bringing in discrimination. Ok.    Do you think the south was any different than the north regarding discrimination against...

We’re talking about slavery but you are bringing in discrimination. Ok. 
 

Do you think the south was any different than the north regarding discrimination against blacks?  In some ways yes, but they discriminated and segregated up until 1964. Some say the north is still doing it, specifically NY. 
 

Do you feel the same way about the north?

Also, England ended slavery and then decades later slave owners freed their slaves only after they were compensated.

"They were forgiven"

Who was forgiven? Why? Because Lee surrendered?

The point is when saying "slavery was part of the culture" it ignores the part of the culture that was saying slavery is wrong. The Missouri Compromise was written in 1820 because people were saying slavery is wrong and the US shouldn't have more of it. 

Edit: https://www.loc.gov/collections/slave-narratives-from-the-federal-write…

1
2
Robgvx
Posts
4048
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
6/19/2023 6:34am
So Trump had access and possibly retains privilege regarding classified information that Biden didn’t have until recent and Clinton has never had.    Hope he gets...

So Trump had access and possibly retains privilege regarding classified information that Biden didn’t have until recent and Clinton has never had. 
 

Hope he gets the chance to hold them accountable.

Robgvx wrote:
They’re not the people with an indictment hanging over them (and not the subject of this thread). That said, if they’re guilty, indict them. The rules...

They’re not the people with an indictment hanging over them (and not the subject of this thread).

That said, if they’re guilty, indict them. The rules are straightforward, as your man in the video has made quite clear.  Present the evidence (like Jack Smith has) and throw the book at them.

Gworm wrote:
This argument reminds me of the children’s song “ there’s a hole in the bucket, dear Liza” it just keeps going in circles.  The whole point...

This argument reminds me of the children’s song “ there’s a hole in the bucket, dear Liza” it just keeps going in circles. 

The whole point is, there IS much more damning evidence on both Hillary and Joe, Comey actually admitted it and then said that no reasonable prosecutor would file charges because there was no intent, when Hillary destroyed emails that were subpoenad, and destroys evidence with bleachbit and hammers! No intent! BS!

The left keeps saying,” If they are guilty they should be charged, too”. The point is there IS evidence and they ARE guilty,  but no charges. 


 

Then why didn't Trump and his guys charge during Trump's four years at the golf course, I mean, helm? If the evidence is so 'damning", as you say, surely the president who was going to "enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information", said, "No one will be above the law", and led chants of "Lock her up!" would have made sure that happened, right?

2
6
Gworm
Posts
2785
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
6/19/2023 6:44am
Robgvx wrote:
Then why didn't Trump and his guys charge during Trump's four years at the golf course, I mean, helm? If the evidence is so 'damning", as...

Then why didn't Trump and his guys charge during Trump's four years at the golf course, I mean, helm? If the evidence is so 'damning", as you say, surely the president who was going to "enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information", said, "No one will be above the law", and led chants of "Lock her up!" would have made sure that happened, right?

Trust me, I’m not happy about that. 
 

Trump was new to Washington, and he somewhat let the establishment set the tone, and they pushed the narrative that you shouldn’t prosecute a political opponent, which has been the norm, and he followed along. 

I sincerely doubt he will do that in second term.  Biden has reset that norm. 

2
5

The Shop

Robgvx
Posts
4048
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
6/19/2023 6:52am
Robgvx wrote:
Then why didn't Trump and his guys charge during Trump's four years at the golf course, I mean, helm? If the evidence is so 'damning", as...

Then why didn't Trump and his guys charge during Trump's four years at the golf course, I mean, helm? If the evidence is so 'damning", as you say, surely the president who was going to "enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information", said, "No one will be above the law", and led chants of "Lock her up!" would have made sure that happened, right?

Gworm wrote:
Trust me, I’m not happy about that.    Trump was new to Washington, and he somewhat let the establishment set the tone, and they pushed the...

Trust me, I’m not happy about that. 
 

Trump was new to Washington, and he somewhat let the establishment set the tone, and they pushed the narrative that you shouldn’t prosecute a political opponent, which has been the norm, and he followed along. 

I sincerely doubt he will do that in second term.  Biden has reset that norm. 

if there's something that defined Trump, 'Letting the establishment set the tone' isn't it.

 

4
6
Gworm
Posts
2785
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
6/19/2023 7:10am
Robgvx wrote:

if there's something that defined Trump, 'Letting the establishment set the tone' isn't it.

 

I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately. 
 

His biggest fail was that he trusted too many of the established, backstabbing republicans that hated him as much or more than the dems. 

I wish he had cleaned house immediately. 
 


 

1
5
Robgvx
Posts
4048
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
6/19/2023 7:26am
Robgvx wrote:

if there's something that defined Trump, 'Letting the establishment set the tone' isn't it.

 

Gworm wrote:
I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately.    His biggest fail...

I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately. 
 

His biggest fail was that he trusted too many of the established, backstabbing republicans that hated him as much or more than the dems. 

I wish he had cleaned house immediately. 
 


 

So essentially, everyone is corrupt, except the guy with the indictment/s.

Got it. 
 

 

3
5
R66
Posts
1344
Joined
4/16/2021
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
6/19/2023 7:54am

I can’t believe how far some of you have your heads up your ass. 

1
1
Gworm
Posts
2785
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
6/19/2023 7:58am
Robgvx wrote:

if there's something that defined Trump, 'Letting the establishment set the tone' isn't it.

 

Gworm wrote:
I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately.    His biggest fail...

I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately. 
 

His biggest fail was that he trusted too many of the established, backstabbing republicans that hated him as much or more than the dems. 

I wish he had cleaned house immediately. 
 


 

Robgvx wrote:

So essentially, everyone is corrupt, except the guy with the indictment/s.

Got it. 
 

 

Wow, I got thru to one. 
 

Glad I could help!

4
Robgvx
Posts
4048
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
6/19/2023 8:08am
Gworm wrote:
I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately.    His biggest fail...

I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately. 
 

His biggest fail was that he trusted too many of the established, backstabbing republicans that hated him as much or more than the dems. 

I wish he had cleaned house immediately. 
 


 

Robgvx wrote:

So essentially, everyone is corrupt, except the guy with the indictment/s.

Got it. 
 

 

Gworm wrote:

Wow, I got thru to one. 
 

Glad I could help!

😂😂😂😂

3
TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
6/19/2023 8:46am Edited Date/Time 6/19/2023 9:30am

As expected, 0 defense of Trump when asked to isolate his case in its own and defend it. All it is is whataboutism.

Lots of Biden Derangement Syndrome in this thread. The topic is a major news story about a former president being federally indicted for the first time in our history, yet some of you cannot type a response without saying Biden. He must live rent free in your heads.

If we are to believe that Biden has weaponized the entire justice system, then we have to believe that the POTUS has that authority and can do so. Based on that premise, Trump had 4 years of the presidency, 2 of which his party also controlled the House and Senate, to follow through with his promises and drain the swamp, holding officials accountable and making sure all classified information is secured. He did not. One of the following must be true. Which is it?

1. He was lying to everyone all along and doesn’t give a shit about anyone or securing classified information, and therefore added to the swamp instead of draining it. Failing to even attempt his major campaign promise.

2. The POTUS does not have the authority to weaponize every single agency against a political opponent, and therefore we then know that Biden is not and cannot be doing the same today.

3. He did weaponize the agencies against political opponents, but was unable to find anything at all on any of them, so no federal indictments were ever made.

Which is it? If the answer is none of the above, then you accept that they work independently from the POTUS and understand what Trump did is much worse than anyone else they’ve investigated, hence the indictments. Once again, a Grand Jury made up of regular every day Americans are the ones who decided to indict, not anyone in any organization or the Executive Branch.

All he had to do was return the documents when asked repeatedly. For reasons unknown, he refused. He was never indicted or even pursued criminally in any way for the 197 documents he did return.

What happened to backing the blue and supporting our brave men and women in law enforcement? Is that all out the window now?

1
8
6/19/2023 9:14am

Red team, blue team, who gives a shit.

1
TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
6/19/2023 9:32am
Robgvx wrote:
Then why didn't Trump and his guys charge during Trump's four years at the golf course, I mean, helm? If the evidence is so 'damning", as...

Then why didn't Trump and his guys charge during Trump's four years at the golf course, I mean, helm? If the evidence is so 'damning", as you say, surely the president who was going to "enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information", said, "No one will be above the law", and led chants of "Lock her up!" would have made sure that happened, right?

Gworm wrote:
Trust me, I’m not happy about that.    Trump was new to Washington, and he somewhat let the establishment set the tone, and they pushed the...

Trust me, I’m not happy about that. 
 

Trump was new to Washington, and he somewhat let the establishment set the tone, and they pushed the narrative that you shouldn’t prosecute a political opponent, which has been the norm, and he followed along. 

I sincerely doubt he will do that in second term.  Biden has reset that norm. 

There will be no second term. The sooner you accept that and jump ship to a candidate that can actually win, the better off the Republican Party will be. He’s done nothing to inspire voters to flip from Biden in 20 to him in 24. J6 lost him millions of voters, as did RvW. His candidates in 22 completely flopped. Wake up and shift your support to a different Republican, or just keep losing. Your call.

3
7
Robgvx
Posts
4048
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
6/19/2023 9:59am
Gworm wrote:

Wow, I got thru to one. 
 

Glad I could help!

Mark Esper, Trump’s Defence Secretary:


“If the allegations are true that it contained information about our nation’s security, about our vulnerabilities, about other items, it could be quite harmful to the nation. And, look, no one is above the law. And so I think this process needs to play out and people held to account, the president held to account,”

 

Another one of those corrupt Republicans (who Trump hired). 

3
5
Gworm
Posts
2785
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
6/19/2023 10:17am
TDeath21 wrote:
There will be no second term. The sooner you accept that and jump ship to a candidate that can actually win, the better off the Republican...

There will be no second term. The sooner you accept that and jump ship to a candidate that can actually win, the better off the Republican Party will be. He’s done nothing to inspire voters to flip from Biden in 20 to him in 24. J6 lost him millions of voters, as did RvW. His candidates in 22 completely flopped. Wake up and shift your support to a different Republican, or just keep losing. Your call.

Yes, it makes perfect sense. Biden is afraid he will beat Trump too badly, so he vowed to do everything he could to keep him from running again. 

He wants to run against someone that will probably beat him. He’s that good. 

3
4
APLMAN99
Posts
12513
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR, USA
Fantasy
6/19/2023 10:19am

PLANTED DOCUMENTS.jpg?VersionId=nupMvukWgwLHEQxYhz 3waQH7Wj1

 

3
5
zookrider62!
Posts
6825
Joined
12/22/2008
Location
Plano, TX, USA
6/19/2023 10:23am Edited Date/Time 6/19/2023 10:24am
TDeath21 wrote:
There will be no second term. The sooner you accept that and jump ship to a candidate that can actually win, the better off the Republican...

There will be no second term. The sooner you accept that and jump ship to a candidate that can actually win, the better off the Republican Party will be. He’s done nothing to inspire voters to flip from Biden in 20 to him in 24. J6 lost him millions of voters, as did RvW. His candidates in 22 completely flopped. Wake up and shift your support to a different Republican, or just keep losing. Your call.

Gworm wrote:
Yes, it makes perfect sense. Biden is afraid he will beat Trump too badly, so he vowed to do everything he could to keep him from...

Yes, it makes perfect sense. Biden is afraid he will beat Trump too badly, so he vowed to do everything he could to keep him from running again. 

He wants to run against someone that will probably beat him. He’s that good. 

FWIW, if Joe has the dementia that a lot of you swear by him having, he probably doesn't know who he is running against, or that he himself is running

3
2
Gworm
Posts
2785
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
6/19/2023 10:27am
TDeath21 wrote:
There will be no second term. The sooner you accept that and jump ship to a candidate that can actually win, the better off the Republican...

There will be no second term. The sooner you accept that and jump ship to a candidate that can actually win, the better off the Republican Party will be. He’s done nothing to inspire voters to flip from Biden in 20 to him in 24. J6 lost him millions of voters, as did RvW. His candidates in 22 completely flopped. Wake up and shift your support to a different Republican, or just keep losing. Your call.

Gworm wrote:
Yes, it makes perfect sense. Biden is afraid he will beat Trump too badly, so he vowed to do everything he could to keep him from...

Yes, it makes perfect sense. Biden is afraid he will beat Trump too badly, so he vowed to do everything he could to keep him from running again. 

He wants to run against someone that will probably beat him. He’s that good. 

FWIW, if Joe has the dementia that a lot of you swear by him having, he probably doesn't know who he is running against, or that...

FWIW, if Joe has the dementia that a lot of you swear by him having, he probably doesn't know who he is running against, or that he himself is running

God save the Queen, man. 
 

3
3
LoudLove
Posts
2883
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
6/19/2023 10:33am
Gworm wrote:
Yes, it makes perfect sense. Biden is afraid he will beat Trump too badly, so he vowed to do everything he could to keep him from...

Yes, it makes perfect sense. Biden is afraid he will beat Trump too badly, so he vowed to do everything he could to keep him from running again. 

He wants to run against someone that will probably beat him. He’s that good. 

FWIW, if Joe has the dementia that a lot of you swear by him having, he probably doesn't know who he is running against, or that...

FWIW, if Joe has the dementia that a lot of you swear by him having, he probably doesn't know who he is running against, or that he himself is running

Gworm wrote:

God save the Queen, man. 
 

Whodathunk Biden was a Sex Pistols fan?!

2
LoudLove
Posts
2883
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
6/19/2023 10:39am
Robgvx wrote:

if there's something that defined Trump, 'Letting the establishment set the tone' isn't it.

 

Gworm wrote:
I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately.    His biggest fail...

I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately. 
 

His biggest fail was that he trusted too many of the established, backstabbing republicans that hated him as much or more than the dems. 

I wish he had cleaned house immediately. 
 


 

Or was his biggest fail not trusting republicans enough?  As Trump learned, navigating D.C. requires a skill set that does not readily translate from the corporate sector. Yet his “my way or the highway” approach and long history of distrusting others forged an inevitable path to (relative) failure. 
 

Let’s not forget, Trump hand-picked every advisor and cabinet member. Is he such a bad judge of character that everyone up to and including his VP turned out to be a rebellious traitor?  Or maybe, just maybe, Trump is re-elected if he took his foot off the gas, even just a little. But that was never going to happen. 

2
4
TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
6/19/2023 10:50am
Robgvx wrote:

if there's something that defined Trump, 'Letting the establishment set the tone' isn't it.

 

Gworm wrote:
I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately.    His biggest fail...

I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately. 
 

His biggest fail was that he trusted too many of the established, backstabbing republicans that hated him as much or more than the dems. 

I wish he had cleaned house immediately. 
 


 

LoudLove wrote:
Or was his biggest fail not trusting republicans enough?  As Trump learned, navigating D.C. requires a skill set that does not readily translate from the corporate...

Or was his biggest fail not trusting republicans enough?  As Trump learned, navigating D.C. requires a skill set that does not readily translate from the corporate sector. Yet his “my way or the highway” approach and long history of distrusting others forged an inevitable path to (relative) failure. 
 

Let’s not forget, Trump hand-picked every advisor and cabinet member. Is he such a bad judge of character that everyone up to and including his VP turned out to be a rebellious traitor?  Or maybe, just maybe, Trump is re-elected if he took his foot off the gas, even just a little. But that was never going to happen. 

Every person on his team is an absolute genius and amazing for the job when he puts them there. When they leave they were the worst ever.

So either he’s a god awful judge of character and he should never be president because of the type of people he puts in his cabinet and inner circle.

Or he puts terrible people in positions of power on purpose, knowing they’re terrible, and thus should never be president because of this action.

Which is it?

2
6
Gworm
Posts
2785
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
6/19/2023 11:58am
Gworm wrote:
I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately.    His biggest fail...

I would agree with you in regards to most issues, but with some issues he did let them lead him around, unfortunately. 
 

His biggest fail was that he trusted too many of the established, backstabbing republicans that hated him as much or more than the dems. 

I wish he had cleaned house immediately. 
 


 

LoudLove wrote:
Or was his biggest fail not trusting republicans enough?  As Trump learned, navigating D.C. requires a skill set that does not readily translate from the corporate...

Or was his biggest fail not trusting republicans enough?  As Trump learned, navigating D.C. requires a skill set that does not readily translate from the corporate sector. Yet his “my way or the highway” approach and long history of distrusting others forged an inevitable path to (relative) failure. 
 

Let’s not forget, Trump hand-picked every advisor and cabinet member. Is he such a bad judge of character that everyone up to and including his VP turned out to be a rebellious traitor?  Or maybe, just maybe, Trump is re-elected if he took his foot off the gas, even just a little. But that was never going to happen. 

TDeath21 wrote:
Every person on his team is an absolute genius and amazing for the job when he puts them there. When they leave they were the worst...

Every person on his team is an absolute genius and amazing for the job when he puts them there. When they leave they were the worst ever.

So either he’s a god awful judge of character and he should never be president because of the type of people he puts in his cabinet and inner circle.

Or he puts terrible people in positions of power on purpose, knowing they’re terrible, and thus should never be president because of this action.

Which is it?

image 56
 

image 57
 

Speaking of cabinet members…

 

it’s hard to tell sometimes when someone will backstab you. 
 

These two have issues that were right in front of  Joe’s eyes. 
 

 

8
6
TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
6/19/2023 12:08pm
LoudLove wrote:
Or was his biggest fail not trusting republicans enough?  As Trump learned, navigating D.C. requires a skill set that does not readily translate from the corporate...

Or was his biggest fail not trusting republicans enough?  As Trump learned, navigating D.C. requires a skill set that does not readily translate from the corporate sector. Yet his “my way or the highway” approach and long history of distrusting others forged an inevitable path to (relative) failure. 
 

Let’s not forget, Trump hand-picked every advisor and cabinet member. Is he such a bad judge of character that everyone up to and including his VP turned out to be a rebellious traitor?  Or maybe, just maybe, Trump is re-elected if he took his foot off the gas, even just a little. But that was never going to happen. 

TDeath21 wrote:
Every person on his team is an absolute genius and amazing for the job when he puts them there. When they leave they were the worst...

Every person on his team is an absolute genius and amazing for the job when he puts them there. When they leave they were the worst ever.

So either he’s a god awful judge of character and he should never be president because of the type of people he puts in his cabinet and inner circle.

Or he puts terrible people in positions of power on purpose, knowing they’re terrible, and thus should never be president because of this action.

Which is it?

Gworm wrote:
    Speaking of cabinet members…   it’s hard to tell sometimes when someone will backstab you.    These two have issues that were right in...

image 56
 

image 57
 

Speaking of cabinet members…

 

it’s hard to tell sometimes when someone will backstab you. 
 

These two have issues that were right in front of  Joe’s eyes. 
 

 

More whataboutism. You still can’t defend Trump in this case when it’s isolated. So you, and everyone on the Trump Train, will try everything you can to derail the thread and go off topic. Whether it be insults or whataboutism or pushing Confederate propaganda. Because you know, deep down, you can’t defend Trump here in this case. You just won’t admit it because admitting you were wrong about Trump for 7 years now would be too much for you to handle. It’s an extremely difficult thing for us to do as a species. Admit we fucked up. I hope you find the courage to do so someday.

7
9
6/19/2023 7:53pm
TDeath21 wrote:
As expected, 0 defense of Trump when asked to isolate his case in its own and defend it. All it is is whataboutism. Lots of Biden...

As expected, 0 defense of Trump when asked to isolate his case in its own and defend it. All it is is whataboutism.

Lots of Biden Derangement Syndrome in this thread. The topic is a major news story about a former president being federally indicted for the first time in our history, yet some of you cannot type a response without saying Biden. He must live rent free in your heads.

If we are to believe that Biden has weaponized the entire justice system, then we have to believe that the POTUS has that authority and can do so. Based on that premise, Trump had 4 years of the presidency, 2 of which his party also controlled the House and Senate, to follow through with his promises and drain the swamp, holding officials accountable and making sure all classified information is secured. He did not. One of the following must be true. Which is it?

1. He was lying to everyone all along and doesn’t give a shit about anyone or securing classified information, and therefore added to the swamp instead of draining it. Failing to even attempt his major campaign promise.

2. The POTUS does not have the authority to weaponize every single agency against a political opponent, and therefore we then know that Biden is not and cannot be doing the same today.

3. He did weaponize the agencies against political opponents, but was unable to find anything at all on any of them, so no federal indictments were ever made.

Which is it? If the answer is none of the above, then you accept that they work independently from the POTUS and understand what Trump did is much worse than anyone else they’ve investigated, hence the indictments. Once again, a Grand Jury made up of regular every day Americans are the ones who decided to indict, not anyone in any organization or the Executive Branch.

All he had to do was return the documents when asked repeatedly. For reasons unknown, he refused. He was never indicted or even pursued criminally in any way for the 197 documents he did return.

What happened to backing the blue and supporting our brave men and women in law enforcement? Is that all out the window now?

They were lying all along. 

 

 

4
6/19/2023 8:33pm
TDeath21 wrote:
Every person on his team is an absolute genius and amazing for the job when he puts them there. When they leave they were the worst...

Every person on his team is an absolute genius and amazing for the job when he puts them there. When they leave they were the worst ever.

So either he’s a god awful judge of character and he should never be president because of the type of people he puts in his cabinet and inner circle.

Or he puts terrible people in positions of power on purpose, knowing they’re terrible, and thus should never be president because of this action.

Which is it?

Gworm wrote:
    Speaking of cabinet members…   it’s hard to tell sometimes when someone will backstab you.    These two have issues that were right in...

image 56
 

image 57
 

Speaking of cabinet members…

 

it’s hard to tell sometimes when someone will backstab you. 
 

These two have issues that were right in front of  Joe’s eyes. 
 

 

TDeath21 wrote:
More whataboutism. You still can’t defend Trump in this case when it’s isolated. So you, and everyone on the Trump Train, will try everything you can...

More whataboutism. You still can’t defend Trump in this case when it’s isolated. So you, and everyone on the Trump Train, will try everything you can to derail the thread and go off topic. Whether it be insults or whataboutism or pushing Confederate propaganda. Because you know, deep down, you can’t defend Trump here in this case. You just won’t admit it because admitting you were wrong about Trump for 7 years now would be too much for you to handle. It’s an extremely difficult thing for us to do as a species. Admit we fucked up. I hope you find the courage to do so someday.

Your question has been answered you’re ignoring it because you don’t like it. 

3
6
Robgvx
Posts
4048
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
6/19/2023 11:03pm Edited Date/Time 6/20/2023 4:50am

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/15/us/politics/judge-trump-documents-security-clearances.html

 

From the above link:

“The judge overseeing former President Donald J. Trump’s indictment on charges of illegally retaining national defense information issued an order on Thursday instructing any lawyer who wants to take part in the case to start the process of obtaining a security clearance to handle classified material by early next week.”

 

If Trump declassified all of the documents in his possession - and that is his primary defence - why is he not contesting judge Cannon’s order that both the prosecution and defence teams must obtain classified security clearances ahead of the trial?

3
6
Joey Bridges
Posts
9600
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN, USA
6/20/2023 3:21am

This just in !!!

Apparently the contents of the "classified documents" contain the, oh so classified plans for the railroad from the pacific, across the indian ocean.

No wonder biden wants to throw trump behind bars.

 

Can't have him taking credit for one of his, build back better programs. 

🤔

2
9
6/20/2023 6:26am
This just in !!! Apparently the contents of the "classified documents" contain the, oh so classified plans for the railroad from the pacific, across the indian...

This just in !!!

Apparently the contents of the "classified documents" contain the, oh so classified plans for the railroad from the pacific, across the indian ocean.

No wonder biden wants to throw trump behind bars.

 

Can't have him taking credit for one of his, build back better programs. 

🤔

Source?

early
Posts
9914
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
6/20/2023 6:55am

It's so over for this guy

FzEgn37aAAInG2 .jpeg?VersionId=oNngoc5qvS07oNMb7rBB

 

2

Post a reply to: Federal Trump Indictment

The Latest