3rd wave down coming soon...

dougie
Posts
2140
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Temecula, CA, USA
7/13/2009 7:03am
flarider wrote:
I think 13% unemployment is high, if not scare-mongering I think it MAY go as high as 11%, likely mid to upper 10's This is according...
I think 13% unemployment is high, if not scare-mongering
I think it MAY go as high as 11%, likely mid to upper 10's
This is according to many economists and forecasters.
If you look at the numbers, the rate of increase has been slowing over the last few months.
It was all in free fall prior to that, this is part of that slowing train analogy...you're not going to stop unemployment increases overnight, it takes time and is one of the last indicators....everything happens first and then unemployment moves, so if unemployment is slowing, that is a good indicator of other things improving, which the data shows.

Market is going to swing wildly for a while because of emotions and fear until the entire system stabilizes, which will take some time

The "Chicken Little" experts certainly aren't helping anything and are usually proven wrong
You mention the Chicken little experts and there are certainly a few out there but if you watch these Stk Mkt shows they have many more Pollyanna types on that keep saying that were about the "Break out" and if you dont get on the Gravy train now youre gonna miss out. They go on to say you need to have your head examined if you dont get in now at these bargin basement prices. I find it all quite funny because this is about money, its about percentages, Its about math. Id think that rational thought would overide optimism or pessimism. But the longer I watch this stuff the more Im convinced it never will. I guess its part of the human condition. Most of us are going to lean one way or another. If I were a businessman and/or had money in the market Id have a tuff time listening to anything negative. But Im not a business owner nor do I have a dog in this fight so it would make sense that Id be indifferent Instead I tend to see our economy as a turd in a toilet just waiting for a flush. My reason? Because when watching the Bulls talk I get that same feeling I do as when Im talking to a used car salesman. I "feel" I'm being lied to, Its a gut feelig.
kcadrenalin
Posts
1427
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Turney, MO, USA
7/13/2009 7:13am
rubarb wrote:
Its another pin the tail on the dj...

Waxman-Markey in my opinion will annihilate the US economy.
Sad but true. I'm sure I'll be called a fear-monger(er), but if that bill, as written, makes it to the Presidents desk, we will become a third world economy.

Ivan
Posts
792
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
7/13/2009 7:25am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 12:53am
dougie wrote:
If the S&P has risen 40% from its March lows and then it lost 7% this week does that mean that its up 33% from its...
If the S&P has risen 40% from its March lows and then it lost 7% this week does that mean that its up 33% from its March lows? How is that math done?
Motodude wrote:
It peaked 40% up from the March low...it is 7% off from that high. Well, lets hear Flavrider and Tiki give us their take on it...
It peaked 40% up from the March low...it is 7% off from that high.

Well, lets hear Flavrider and Tiki give us their take on it, or shall they continue to sit on the sidelines throwing rotten eggs like superior Monday morning quarterbacks.
dougie wrote:
My question was how high off of last March lows is it today? Obviously its no longer up 40%. Meridth Whitney was just on an she...
My question was how high off of last March lows is it today? Obviously its no longer up 40%.

Meridth Whitney was just on an she forecast Unemployment going to 13% and the market in the toilet (my intrepretation of her words) thru 2011.
When they talk about up 10% over this period or down 20% over that period they are usually never talking about the same baseline. The calc for a loss percentage is: High - low / high.
The calc for a gain is: high - low / low. The S&P loss 54% of it's value between Oct 07 and March 09'. Since then it's gained 30% off the lows. 880 - 680 / 680. But it's still off 41% from it's high of 1500. It's all in what point they are trying to make. I could say that it has only gotten back 13% of what it lost but you could say it's up 30%. Lotta snakeoil in that business. I saw Whitney also.
Ivan
Posts
792
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
7/13/2009 7:39am
Motodude wrote:
The 3rd wave is always the strongest and most significant step...earnings have been shit, unemployment hase been steadily growing depsite the bounce (wave 2) that started...
The 3rd wave is always the strongest and most significant step...earnings have been shit, unemployment hase been steadily growing depsite the bounce (wave 2) that started back in March. New data will only confirm the change in mood to drive the Dow toward 3500 or lower toward 1500. Ready???
Put your money where you mouth is and load the boat with (SDS). It's a radical mofo.

The Shop

Ivan
Posts
792
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
7/13/2009 7:42am

dougie
Posts
2140
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Temecula, CA, USA
7/13/2009 7:45am
Motodude wrote:
It peaked 40% up from the March low...it is 7% off from that high. Well, lets hear Flavrider and Tiki give us their take on it...
It peaked 40% up from the March low...it is 7% off from that high.

Well, lets hear Flavrider and Tiki give us their take on it, or shall they continue to sit on the sidelines throwing rotten eggs like superior Monday morning quarterbacks.
dougie wrote:
My question was how high off of last March lows is it today? Obviously its no longer up 40%. Meridth Whitney was just on an she...
My question was how high off of last March lows is it today? Obviously its no longer up 40%.

Meridth Whitney was just on an she forecast Unemployment going to 13% and the market in the toilet (my intrepretation of her words) thru 2011.
Ivan wrote:
When they talk about up 10% over this period or down 20% over that period they are usually never talking about the same baseline. The calc...
When they talk about up 10% over this period or down 20% over that period they are usually never talking about the same baseline. The calc for a loss percentage is: High - low / high.
The calc for a gain is: high - low / low. The S&P loss 54% of it's value between Oct 07 and March 09'. Since then it's gained 30% off the lows. 880 - 680 / 680. But it's still off 41% from it's high of 1500. It's all in what point they are trying to make. I could say that it has only gotten back 13% of what it lost but you could say it's up 30%. Lotta snakeoil in that business. I saw Whitney also.
Thanks Bro. Thats what I was lookin for.
brainbasket
Posts
1531
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Ventura, CA, USA
7/13/2009 11:15am
Motodude wrote:
Next big drop is coming for the stock market.
flarider wrote:
Want to be the expert.... Give a day that your above prediction begins, for how long and how low....Let's hear it sport, otherwise you're a full...
Want to be the expert....

Give a day that your above prediction begins, for how long and how low....Let's hear it sport, otherwise you're a full of shit bullshit hack

Give us a DATE, TIME FRAME and MARKET LOSS PERCENTAGE

Motodude wrote:
How about you give us some details of what will happen over the next 3 weeks? I'm not predicting, I'm making forecasts of whats to come...
How about you give us some details of what will happen over the next 3 weeks? I'm not predicting, I'm making forecasts of whats to come, that is inhreantly fallable yet gives one a decent idea of whats coming.

I felt the DOW would rise above 9000 since March, but it has failed only getting to almost 8900, which shows it is still VERY bearish. It still might rise but highly doubtful. During the next month resistance will be around the 7800 area.
Uhhh ... sorry but no.

You certainly did not predict the Dow would rise since March - actually you predicted Dow 5000 right here on this board when the Dow hit 6500 in March. You also left open the possibility of Dow 3500 if it broke below 5000.

In late March as the market climbed and almost hit 8000 in the face of your 5000 call, I bumped the thread up for a laugh.
Then the Dow fell a few hundred points and you posted another thread about the market crashing to some other level, like 6000.
I bumped the original thread a second time and I talked to you about the hazards of using past performance (charts) to predict markets.

I searched for that thread and can't find it, but I'm sure I'm not the only one that remembers how ridiculous it looked having that completely misdirected call on page one with your later call after the fact....
kcadrenalin
Posts
1427
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Turney, MO, USA
7/13/2009 11:17am
I remember
Racer92
Posts
17965
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Central, TX, USA
7/13/2009 11:23am
I dont follow the markets and have zero credentials, but I think there is some serious shit looming in the distance. I think there are a lot of prop'd up numbers and sugar coated realities in the world of big business. The house of cards can only teeter so long.
Tiki
Posts
10677
Joined
8/1/2006
Location
Corona, CA, USA
Fantasy
7/13/2009 11:29am
Motodude wrote:
I dont do stocks I've told you. But you two brainiacs havent offered one bit of anything except sideline heckling.
This statement confuses me. "I don't do stocks" then what is it exactly the third wave you are referring to?

Definition of the Dow Jones:
Dow Jones Average indicators used to measure and report value changes in representative stock groupings on the New York stock exchange.

Whether it be individual or groupings wouldn't it play out to be knowledgeable in the Stock market to recognize the trends? I make no claim to being a financial expert as you have said previously with respect to the clients you represent.

Please correct me where I am wrong for the sake of the thread. This isn't heckling, just simple clarifications.
txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX, USA
7/13/2009 11:41am
Dougie talked about the pollyanna's predicting market gain. I don't know why it's gone up as high as it has. IMO, there is nothing to merit growth in the past 6 months other than the world didn't collapse.

As Racer92 said, we have a lot to work through. One major problem is what is waiting on the other side of the rainbow? We have nothing the world wants. Our economic juggernaut was propelled by being a leader in having what others wanted. We don't make anything these days other than defense weapons that are at the forefront. We cannot compete on low cost manufacturing. Most of the last 20 years have been based on internal booms, meaning we pushed forward on technology and built houses--items for consumption.

Obama is right about one thing: if we don't find an area in which we lead the world, we are headed for mediocrity. He refers to energy, and that's probably our best hope. But, it will be short lived boom (again). If and when new technology is unveiled, it will be distributed throughout the world quickly enough.

For me, I don't foresee any significant growth in the market. Some contraction is virtually a must. A crash or rapid decline to 2,3,4000? Could happen. The fact that it hasn't happened already makes it less likely though.
jtomasik
Posts
12895
Joined
8/17/2006
Location
Golden, CO, USA
7/13/2009 11:45am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 12:53am
We're going to start exporting fast food drive-thru attendants and home loan writers. That'll put us into the black and start paying off the national debt.


Yeah, we're gonna be big.
Racer92
Posts
17965
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Central, TX, USA
7/13/2009 11:50am
"The fact that it hasn't happened already makes it less likely though."

Im not so sure on that. How long did Enron doctor the books before it was known they were broke? How long before Bernard Madoff got found out? Allen Stanford?

There are a lot of clever 'suits' out there trying to keep the natives from getting restless.
brainbasket
Posts
1531
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Ventura, CA, USA
7/13/2009 11:54am
Here's my 2 cents. well it's actually worth less than that cuz I'm posting it here for nothing.

I look at the movement of capital and try to predict where it might go to get returns rather than trying to predict prices. Capital always seeks a profit, and there's always somewhere to make a profit, so where might that be? If you predict where capital will go, you will find a market that's rising (prices).

Right now "the consumer is dead" is the conventional wisdom. But that's not the end of the story. The consumer is repositioning to a more sustainable financial state by paying down debt and increasing savings. I didn't think that was possible, but here we are. Are there soup kitchens? Not really, not yet anyway. I think that takes some fuel away from the "Depression" scenario in the US. Can't say it's the same in other countries though.

The consumer (retail investors) are out of stocks right now, not because they are a great judge of what direction the market might go, but because they have lost money in their IRA's and 401ks and are scared. What that means to me is that there is a lot of money on the sidelines because of "fear". Fear isn't a great predictor of markets.

Retail investors wont jump back into the market until after a sustained rally. They wont touch stocks until then, and then they will put the froth on whatever new rally forms.

Big Money has been similarly whacked, and Big Money (money managers) are managing somewhat smaller portfolios because of the flight to lower risk investments, so their ability to move markets is somewhat lessened now. Another Big Money problem is death of some prominent hedge funds. Shorting the market at these levels is a risky game IMO.

Big International Money is in more trouble than domestic US money IMO. These investors will look to the stability (relatively) of the US market, which will bring capital to US markets eventually, the current recession notwithstanding.

I think the case for sideways/higher is easier to make than a collapsing market, if for no other reason than there aren't many other places for capital to go ....
txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX, USA
7/13/2009 12:00pm
you make a point. I'm not expert, but I follow what you are saying.

The thoughts/ questions you raise for me are about what has happened already we just don't know it.

Cummulatively a tremendous amount of wealth (capital) vaporized...paper profits disappeared. But, not totally. I am afraid there are still paper losses and wealth vaporization to go. And this will be the scare that drops the market to another low level. It depends on how prepared we are when the other shoe falls if it will drop excessively or not.

Of course, I'm probably wrong. I certainly don't understand the current level of the market.
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
7/13/2009 12:02pm
Here's my 2 cents. well it's actually worth less than that cuz I'm posting it here for nothing. I look at the movement of capital and...
Here's my 2 cents. well it's actually worth less than that cuz I'm posting it here for nothing.

I look at the movement of capital and try to predict where it might go to get returns rather than trying to predict prices. Capital always seeks a profit, and there's always somewhere to make a profit, so where might that be? If you predict where capital will go, you will find a market that's rising (prices).

Right now "the consumer is dead" is the conventional wisdom. But that's not the end of the story. The consumer is repositioning to a more sustainable financial state by paying down debt and increasing savings. I didn't think that was possible, but here we are. Are there soup kitchens? Not really, not yet anyway. I think that takes some fuel away from the "Depression" scenario in the US. Can't say it's the same in other countries though.

The consumer (retail investors) are out of stocks right now, not because they are a great judge of what direction the market might go, but because they have lost money in their IRA's and 401ks and are scared. What that means to me is that there is a lot of money on the sidelines because of "fear". Fear isn't a great predictor of markets.

Retail investors wont jump back into the market until after a sustained rally. They wont touch stocks until then, and then they will put the froth on whatever new rally forms.

Big Money has been similarly whacked, and Big Money (money managers) are managing somewhat smaller portfolios because of the flight to lower risk investments, so their ability to move markets is somewhat lessened now. Another Big Money problem is death of some prominent hedge funds. Shorting the market at these levels is a risky game IMO.

Big International Money is in more trouble than domestic US money IMO. These investors will look to the stability (relatively) of the US market, which will bring capital to US markets eventually, the current recession notwithstanding.

I think the case for sideways/higher is easier to make than a collapsing market, if for no other reason than there aren't many other places for capital to go ....
Not that I know anything, but I tend to agree with pretty much all of this.

Consumers are scared
Players are wounded
Big players are laying low

But as they say (or something similar), "wealth doesn't go away, it just changes hands"

Right now, IMO, everyone is sitting on the sidelines for one reason or another.
The market is going to fluctuate and have good days and bad, like always.
It's going to react to things as it always has, but it's just going to do it at a lower level, like it is now.
It's not going to jump to 10, 12 or 14,000 overnight.
It's going to go sideways for a long time and it'll be a long gentle climb back to the old heights.

It is also my opinion anyone playing chicken little or candy and rainbows is full of shit.

But, I'm a dumbass, what do I know?
Nerd
Posts
6155
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
7/13/2009 12:14pm
DOW is up 150 right now.
txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX, USA
7/13/2009 12:23pm
Here's my 2 cents. well it's actually worth less than that cuz I'm posting it here for nothing. I look at the movement of capital and...
Here's my 2 cents. well it's actually worth less than that cuz I'm posting it here for nothing.

I look at the movement of capital and try to predict where it might go to get returns rather than trying to predict prices. Capital always seeks a profit, and there's always somewhere to make a profit, so where might that be? If you predict where capital will go, you will find a market that's rising (prices).

Right now "the consumer is dead" is the conventional wisdom. But that's not the end of the story. The consumer is repositioning to a more sustainable financial state by paying down debt and increasing savings. I didn't think that was possible, but here we are. Are there soup kitchens? Not really, not yet anyway. I think that takes some fuel away from the "Depression" scenario in the US. Can't say it's the same in other countries though.

The consumer (retail investors) are out of stocks right now, not because they are a great judge of what direction the market might go, but because they have lost money in their IRA's and 401ks and are scared. What that means to me is that there is a lot of money on the sidelines because of "fear". Fear isn't a great predictor of markets.

Retail investors wont jump back into the market until after a sustained rally. They wont touch stocks until then, and then they will put the froth on whatever new rally forms.

Big Money has been similarly whacked, and Big Money (money managers) are managing somewhat smaller portfolios because of the flight to lower risk investments, so their ability to move markets is somewhat lessened now. Another Big Money problem is death of some prominent hedge funds. Shorting the market at these levels is a risky game IMO.

Big International Money is in more trouble than domestic US money IMO. These investors will look to the stability (relatively) of the US market, which will bring capital to US markets eventually, the current recession notwithstanding.

I think the case for sideways/higher is easier to make than a collapsing market, if for no other reason than there aren't many other places for capital to go ....
flarider wrote:
Not that I know anything, but I tend to agree with pretty much all of this. Consumers are scared Players are wounded Big players are laying...
Not that I know anything, but I tend to agree with pretty much all of this.

Consumers are scared
Players are wounded
Big players are laying low

But as they say (or something similar), "wealth doesn't go away, it just changes hands"

Right now, IMO, everyone is sitting on the sidelines for one reason or another.
The market is going to fluctuate and have good days and bad, like always.
It's going to react to things as it always has, but it's just going to do it at a lower level, like it is now.
It's not going to jump to 10, 12 or 14,000 overnight.
It's going to go sideways for a long time and it'll be a long gentle climb back to the old heights.

It is also my opinion anyone playing chicken little or candy and rainbows is full of shit.

But, I'm a dumbass, what do I know?
wealth can go away. Just as it can be "created"

Tiki
Posts
10677
Joined
8/1/2006
Location
Corona, CA, USA
Fantasy
7/13/2009 12:26pm
A percentage of investors were also waiting to see how the election would pan out. As things started to happen, decisions were made. On the west coast the confidence in buying has increased from where it was three, four months ago. If using the past few years as a standard, that will be a hard act to follow. Much of the buying was done from the real estate greed. In the manner of having instant cash from the home buying. Again from the West Coast perspective people had money to by a lot of non necessities. RV's, Boats, bikes, extravagant cars and trucks, TV's and other high tech stuff. That all trickles down. If measuring at the WalMart scale, I doubt their business has been impacted in the cheap Chinese items. That stuff tractors out of the building.

My take on it, but its just a observation.
brainbasket
Posts
1531
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Ventura, CA, USA
7/13/2009 12:29pm
txmxer wrote:
you make a point. I'm not expert, but I follow what you are saying. The thoughts/ questions you raise for me are about what has happened...
you make a point. I'm not expert, but I follow what you are saying.

The thoughts/ questions you raise for me are about what has happened already we just don't know it.

Cummulatively a tremendous amount of wealth (capital) vaporized...paper profits disappeared. But, not totally. I am afraid there are still paper losses and wealth vaporization to go. And this will be the scare that drops the market to another low level. It depends on how prepared we are when the other shoe falls if it will drop excessively or not.

Of course, I'm probably wrong. I certainly don't understand the current level of the market.
You're right there's been wealth destruction and the Baby Boomers are a factor in this.
We could see the retirement finish line ahead and my guess is a lot of Baby Boomers lost a lot of ouir nesteggs in this.

But these people need to accumulate wealth and put themselves in a better financial postiion within the next 10-20 years more than ever. My guess is a lot of their wealth is in Treasuries and other "safe" investments right now. But the income from these investments can't produce the growth the baby boomers need to make up for what they've lost.
I think the bb's will have to return to the market via equities at some point - they're a lot of the sideline money at the moment, and their capital needs to work harder than ever now.
brainbasket
Posts
1531
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Ventura, CA, USA
7/13/2009 1:14pm
Motodude wrote:
Next big drop is coming for the stock market.
Maybe -

But after today it has to retrace another 185 pts. .......
brainbasket
Posts
1531
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Ventura, CA, USA
7/13/2009 3:48pm
Ba-da-Bump....
WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
USA
7/13/2009 4:47pm
Here's my 2 cents. well it's actually worth less than that cuz I'm posting it here for nothing. I look at the movement of capital and...
Here's my 2 cents. well it's actually worth less than that cuz I'm posting it here for nothing.

I look at the movement of capital and try to predict where it might go to get returns rather than trying to predict prices. Capital always seeks a profit, and there's always somewhere to make a profit, so where might that be? If you predict where capital will go, you will find a market that's rising (prices).

Right now "the consumer is dead" is the conventional wisdom. But that's not the end of the story. The consumer is repositioning to a more sustainable financial state by paying down debt and increasing savings. I didn't think that was possible, but here we are. Are there soup kitchens? Not really, not yet anyway. I think that takes some fuel away from the "Depression" scenario in the US. Can't say it's the same in other countries though.

The consumer (retail investors) are out of stocks right now, not because they are a great judge of what direction the market might go, but because they have lost money in their IRA's and 401ks and are scared. What that means to me is that there is a lot of money on the sidelines because of "fear". Fear isn't a great predictor of markets.

Retail investors wont jump back into the market until after a sustained rally. They wont touch stocks until then, and then they will put the froth on whatever new rally forms.

Big Money has been similarly whacked, and Big Money (money managers) are managing somewhat smaller portfolios because of the flight to lower risk investments, so their ability to move markets is somewhat lessened now. Another Big Money problem is death of some prominent hedge funds. Shorting the market at these levels is a risky game IMO.

Big International Money is in more trouble than domestic US money IMO. These investors will look to the stability (relatively) of the US market, which will bring capital to US markets eventually, the current recession notwithstanding.

I think the case for sideways/higher is easier to make than a collapsing market, if for no other reason than there aren't many other places for capital to go ....
I think that's an excellent analysis. I don't think the market is going back to 14,000, but it's not going to 5,000 either. Companies are profitable, people have at least a little more confidence in the economy than they've had up to now, and there's a good base to move forward. As people start putting some of their 401Ks into stocks again, the market will move - and they really have to eventually, have you checked what they're getting in money markets these days?

But we're never going back to 14,000 because we never should have been there to start with. We got there by reckless consumer puchasing that was stimulated by reckless credit practices. We didn't get there by making better things and being creative and productive. Unemployment is still bad and it's likely to be a while before it gets a lot better, but we were at almost 11% back in 1982 and we survived that. In fact, we not only survived it, we went into a strong growth period afterward.

We're not going to go from bust to boom again, but we should be happy about that. We shouldn't want that. We should be happy with a business base that creates and produces stuff - and that's where we're going.
Motodude
Posts
5320
Joined
2/2/2008
Location
Sydney, AU
7/13/2009 5:30pm Edited Date/Time 7/13/2009 5:44pm
So late in the trading day we get the monthly US treasury budget...$-94.30b...forecast was for $-65b..the biggest decline in 30yrs. This is too late for any significant impact on orders for the trading day. Dj rose before hand on expectations of better figures and fuzzy company data (remember that data is a month out of date already), tomorrow might see a correction in light of this. Foreign interests have made the treasury auctions boom of sorts recently...when that abates we'll see an end of the bear market bull.
dougie
Posts
2140
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Temecula, CA, USA
7/13/2009 8:30pm
I was out all morning and walked in the door at the close. Oil had been down like a buck and a half earlier and now it was positve. The dow was down when I walked out the door but now was 175 and rising. I was like WTF? did someone brew up a new batch of Koolaid?

Something to think about here when looking at unemployment numbers. We have alot of people out of work. We have kids coming out of College and Highschool looking for work. We have record numbers of illegals looking for work. We have H1-B and like 7 other types of imported workers trying to keep their new American jobs AND...........this time we have alot of older workers who were thinking of retireing in the next few years but since they all took it up the ass with their 401ks many of them now want to stay in the work force. And Im thinking that in past recessions we werent exporting jobs at the pace we are today. Guess we'll see eh?
Ivan
Posts
792
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
7/13/2009 8:54pm
The estimates that I have heard are that it requires 100,000 to 150,000 new jobs per month to keep up with the number of people entering the work force.
Motodude
Posts
5320
Joined
2/2/2008
Location
Sydney, AU
7/14/2009 4:07am Edited Date/Time 7/14/2009 4:08am
Gold works when there's inflation, its supposedly an inflation hedge, if so then it should have been at $2000 late 07. All the trillions the feds are pumping into the system still cant create inflation yet. They're fighting tooth, nail and spin cycle to prevent DEFLATION. Sell your gold, re-buy at $650. Deflation will override the kool aid Goldman Sachs bounce.
Grendel
Posts
2559
Joined
5/17/2008
Location
USA
7/14/2009 5:41am
Gold is worth more during an inflation. Brilliant.

Say , do we need air to breathe?
CR250Rider
Posts
6706
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Moses Lake, WA, USA
7/14/2009 6:12am Edited Date/Time 7/14/2009 6:47am
1 ) this is all about real estate. the equity markets crashed because of it, and will recover when property does.



2 ) People still believe that the United States is the land of opportunity and the place to be.



3 ) greed is more powerful than fear.


4 ) nobody likes a gloom and doomer.....motod00d

Rooster
Posts
4432
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edmonton, CA
7/14/2009 8:58am
1) That's an overly simplistic view. Real estate only boomed because of cheap and easy access to money and an on-going wall street scam to sell bad mortgages as AAA grade investment paper. The boom was not driven by a need for additional housing. It was mainly market speculation.

2) If you have a college degree in a field in demand perhaps. Since the US has such a high drop out rate (30%) and has to import so many foreigners to fill the vacant positions in the tech heavy jobs it's hardly the land of opportunity for many Americans today. Unskilled labor jobs pay shit and very few even offer benefits anymore. If your idea of opportunity is a low paying minimum wage part-time job then yeah. There's opportunity to be had.

3) If that were true Wall Street wouldn't need trillion dollar bailout packages. They are truly rich with greed.

4) Reality sucks.

Post a reply to: 3rd wave down coming soon...

The Latest