Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
I need to avoid certain topics, not due to any lack of knowledge or respect for differing opinions, it's due to the lack of compassion and empathy some seem to show for others that becomes bothersome, so I'll have to avoid it and those people.
By the same token, there are obviously times when using deadly force is justified on someone who is 'unarmed' as well. Whether the kid had a weapon is not relevant, unless he was using that weapon in a manner that was a reasonable threat to others.
That's a pet peeve of mine, when people are talking about a victim of a shooting/killing being 'unarmed'. It infers that being armed is reason enough for being killed, and we all know deep down that that simply isn't true.
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
There are no words for the lack of justice and accountability in that entire debacle.
WOW...
I hope you and your family are well.
Those who point the finger are usually the most guilty
I hope there was another witness that saw what happened and heard what words were exchanged. Not that I think the wife was not telling the truth but another random witnesses corroboration would seal the deal.
This is on Youtube btw.
Pit Row
It will be interesting to see what kind of a case the defense puts on. Looks bad for Reeves but it usually does look bad for the defendant at this point. Self defense is a real stretch unless popcorn is considered a deadly weapon.
1. That all the witnesses got together in the theater lobby and agreed on a story. (No evidence of this at all).
2. The video, which almost completely belies the defendants statement, cannot be relied on. (The video is the most impartial witness).
3. The detectives botched the crime scene investigation. ( Boiler plate guilty defendant defense tactic).
4. The victim was the aggressor and attacked the defendant. (Unfortunately this is partially true.)
5. The defendant was a feeble and scared old man. (This seems like they are admitting that the self defense claim would be a real stretch by normal standards).
Pretty slow start. Maybe they are saving the best for last.
I don't think it has enough legs to keep him out of prison
The two expert witnesses turned out to be "who gives a shit".
What baffles me is why the defense called Mrs. Reeves. She was a disaster. To me, between the two wives, she was the more truthful and it didn't help her husband at all. The prosecution should have called her.
Friday was not a good day for the defense and today was worse.
Mrs. Reeves strikes me as a person who just does not want to lie. Mrs. Oulson, not so much.
Nobody knows how a jury will rule but that's how I see it.
I almost don't care how the jury finds. I'm more saddened by what's left in the wake of testosterone dumbfuckery.
I hope that old man has no peaceful days left in his future.
So a guy is dead, a child loses a father and a wife loses her husband, etc.
I guess Reeves wanted to be the...Lone Survivor.
Post a reply to: Local Rider May Finally Get Justice