Posts
804
Joined
8/21/2016
Location
Spring, TX, USA
Edited Date/Time
1/22/2018 3:58pm
I've been on the hunt for a KTM350sxf and just ran across one I really like. It's a 17, but the owner swapped the forks for the 4CS and had Enzo set them up. The guy is a well known racer and he won 2 of 3 motos at Loretta's last year on these forks.
The forks are the only thing holding me back from buying this bike. Everything I've read about the 4CS forks is terrible, but I'm curious about what Enzo could have done to them to make them choose those forks over the AER. I'm going to call Enzo today to see if they can tell me anything about them and what was done internally.
Just curious if anyone here has any experience with properly setup 4CS forks and how they would compare.
Thanks
The forks are the only thing holding me back from buying this bike. Everything I've read about the 4CS forks is terrible, but I'm curious about what Enzo could have done to them to make them choose those forks over the AER. I'm going to call Enzo today to see if they can tell me anything about them and what was done internally.
Just curious if anyone here has any experience with properly setup 4CS forks and how they would compare.
Thanks
I'm a slow vet B (if that is even a category) and I bottomed my forks out 3 times yesterday. Mine have been revalved from FC.
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
These are KYB SSS forks
I called Craig Decker at Enzo and he informed me that he hadn't touched these forks and that someone else had done them. I know he was with Powerband before so I spoke with Billy. Billy told me he hadn't setup any 4CS forks for this rider either and that he always ran the AER forks on his race bikes.
It sounds like they either pieced together a bike, or swapped forks because they prefer the AER.
It makes me question what I was told about him winning 2 motos at Loretta's on these forks when his suspension guy told me point blank that he much prefers the AER and always ran them. Might have to pass on the bike based on this info.
That said, he has a garage full of bikes. Everything he's riding now is 18. I can't tell you why he would have a set of 4CS forks laying around other than they keep getting swapped off of bikes because they actually prefer AER. If I had to guess, it started in 16 when he was on a FE250 with AER and then wanted to upgrade his 350 with AER or conevalves.
Either way, I've decided I'm not going to mess with the 4CS. I text them and said I'm ready to buy the bike if he puts AER forks on it.
Fade to future...I couldn’t leave well enough alone and came across a used set of AER. Did back to back tests at a track I’m very familiar with (mod 4cs vs. stock AER). Spent all day messing with pressure and clickers on AER. The mod 4cs were better in virtually all areas. So then I had him revalve the AER, and now like the AER more overall. Small bump absorption better with AER, slap landings annoying, but overall sticking with AER. Also boils down to a feel. Don’t feel the settle in corners as much with AER compared to spring, something I’ve gotten used to. Prob too much info, 1 Red Bull in the tank, avoiding bike maintenance.
Pit Row
They work so much better then stock. They can be made to work.
Just not a lot of guys can really do them right.
I'll let you take a ride on my 14Fe at Rio if you like, but I need to fix my sub frame from getting center punch 2 weeks ago.
Give me until next week, still working on a Maico 490 rebuild.
Post a reply to: Enzo tuned 4CS vs stock AER48 forks?