3 on 3 and the Chase: A clue this is actually going to happen?

Crush
Posts
21077
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney AU
4/28/2016 8:36pm
JPT wrote:
Crush I disagree. A Chase would not be more exciting because a manufactured championship is meaningless.
Supercross is meaningless! It's a dirtbike race for crying out loud, we're such a small sport, no one cares except the participants, we're not solving cancer, it's just trying to make you get out of your seat instead of checking your stocks whilst Dungey roles around with a 10 second lead.
Jimmy_Sloan
Posts
1424
Joined
9/20/2015
Location
Oak Harbor, WA US
4/28/2016 8:37pm
JPT wrote:
Crush I disagree. A Chase would not be more exciting because a manufactured championship is meaningless.
Crush thinks that riders should get points for passing riders since guys like Canard and Tomac don't get good starts. Basically, if a guy got a bad start and worked up to third or second, he could have more points than the winner.

This just keeps getting sillier and sillier.
Mit12
Posts
2176
Joined
6/23/2014
Location
Lake Havasu City, AZ US
4/28/2016 8:50pm
Staggered starts based on runners times in qualifing for the 100meter races at the olimpics, now we can have close finishes?????? Change the points in SX so a rider that is not prepaired at the beginning of the season can compete with a guy that came in prepaired?????? Note to all, there are winners and there are loosers this is not T Ball.
akillerwombat
Posts
3211
Joined
10/16/2013
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
4/28/2016 8:53pm
In trying to understand the Chase Format a bit more (and doing some research today) I tried to put what I learned into a format my brain could understand...



I could be wrong on how I put it together, but by putting it into the format of what appears to be every other major sport, I think it could be pretty cool.

The Shop

Crush
Posts
21077
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney AU
4/28/2016 9:08pm
Crush thinks that riders should get points for passing riders since guys like Canard and Tomac don't get good starts. Basically, if a guy got a...
Crush thinks that riders should get points for passing riders since guys like Canard and Tomac don't get good starts. Basically, if a guy got a bad start and worked up to third or second, he could have more points than the winner.

This just keeps getting sillier and sillier.
If it means that instead of just watching some dude 10 seconds out front, the guy in 16th has to roller derby 10 guys to win the title and the crowd loses their shit, then fuck yes, why not.

We have MX, it's what it should be, but SX is broken as fuck. It's boring as hell, no matter how you want to frame its defence as some sort of anti-Berne rhetoric.
txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX US
4/28/2016 9:28pm
GuyB wrote:
I think it will add a lot of excitement through the end of what has often become a stale season. I can see it happening for...
I think it will add a lot of excitement through the end of what has often become a stale season. I can see it happening for thst reason alone.

Dungey could have clinched with two rounds left. That's great for him, but not very exciting.
Before we start praising it, shouldn't we wait and see what they are actually going to do?
Jimmy_Sloan
Posts
1424
Joined
9/20/2015
Location
Oak Harbor, WA US
4/28/2016 9:38pm
Crush wrote:
If it means that instead of just watching some dude 10 seconds out front, the guy in 16th has to roller derby 10 guys to win...
If it means that instead of just watching some dude 10 seconds out front, the guy in 16th has to roller derby 10 guys to win the title and the crowd loses their shit, then fuck yes, why not.

We have MX, it's what it should be, but SX is broken as fuck. It's boring as hell, no matter how you want to frame its defence as some sort of anti-Berne rhetoric.
Why not? Because then the winner doesn't win. Your ideas are so ridiculously silly that you want it so the guy who doesn't win, to win.

I give up, I can't deal with that kind of stupidity. Over and out, ground control to Major Tom.
Crush
Posts
21077
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney AU
4/28/2016 9:42pm Edited Date/Time 4/28/2016 9:43pm
Crush wrote:
If it means that instead of just watching some dude 10 seconds out front, the guy in 16th has to roller derby 10 guys to win...
If it means that instead of just watching some dude 10 seconds out front, the guy in 16th has to roller derby 10 guys to win the title and the crowd loses their shit, then fuck yes, why not.

We have MX, it's what it should be, but SX is broken as fuck. It's boring as hell, no matter how you want to frame its defence as some sort of anti-Berne rhetoric.
Why not? Because then the winner doesn't win. Your ideas are so ridiculously silly that you want it so the guy who doesn't win, to win...
Why not? Because then the winner doesn't win. Your ideas are so ridiculously silly that you want it so the guy who doesn't win, to win.

I give up, I can't deal with that kind of stupidity. Over and out, ground control to Major Tom.
It's not a one off event, there are 17 opportunities for whatever structure to shake out the overall winner.

The current system is just another format that favours dudes who can put in a heater and get the start. We have a car race series here that has mixed formats, the best guy still wins.

The Aussie SX championship had double headers, bracket racing, top-10 shoot outs, blah blah, when Chad, Jay and Hanny won, they were the best guys and beat Brayton, Peick, Moss and whoever else. No one questioned their legitimacy, it just added some excitement along the way, even when Reed was 15 seconds out front.
KlootZak
Posts
1324
Joined
7/15/2012
Location
Brussels BE
4/29/2016 1:34am
What's with the expression "we're not curing cancer here" in this thread? Huh "Hey boss, I am sorry we lost all our profit from last year due to my mistake but hey! at least we are not curing cancer over here ..."
Indy mxer
Posts
1836
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
The Villages, FL US
4/29/2016 4:24am
In trying to understand the Chase Format a bit more ([i]and doing some research today[/i]) I tried to put what I learned into a format my...
In trying to understand the Chase Format a bit more (and doing some research today) I tried to put what I learned into a format my brain could understand...



I could be wrong on how I put it together, but by putting it into the format of what appears to be every other major sport, I think it could be pretty cool.
Very well done. I agree it's worth trying. I think it will be a blast to watch. The only other thing I would like to see is a staggered start of some sort. We're the only form of racing where the fast qualifiers don't get to start in the front. Gate pick really doesn't mean shit for the first 7 or 8 riders.
I'd rather see the fastest guys up front every race from the start.

Yeah 20 bikes starting at once is exciting for 10 seconds, but I'd gladly trade that for having all the fast guys in the front battling from the get go. The fastest riders should be rewarded.
Dezerted
Posts
637
Joined
11/10/2011
Location
Temecula, CA US
4/29/2016 6:37am Edited Date/Time 4/29/2016 6:51am
I get why some are against the chase, I also get that Jimmy Sloan is a Dungey fanatic and is crying at the thought of him losing..

Jesus some of you are so dramatic about the chase

Supercross has been predictable for years. Is the chase the answer? Idk but I'm glad they are at least trying somethings which most of you obviously wouldn't do.
4/29/2016 6:43pm
http://racerxonline.com/2016/04/27/3-on-3-questions-we-must-ask I hate to say this because I think any kind of a Chase point system is a bad idea, but I think the guys gave...

http://racerxonline.com/2016/04/27/3-on-3-questions-we-must-ask

I hate to say this because I think any kind of a Chase point system is a bad idea, but I think the guys gave us a clue that this is going to happen. Weege even admits that 99.9% of the fans are against it, and yet he, JT$ and Matthes all claim to like the idea. It's just a hunch, but maybe the industry insiders were signaling because they know it's a done deal?

You don't have to be a Dungey fan to realize that it would be a miscarriage of justice if anyone other than him were to win the Supercross title this year (assuming he finishes the next two races). But that is exactly what could happen if some silly Chase idea is implemented. McGrath, Carmichael, Villopoto - any of these legends could have lost championships if they simply had some bad luck at the final round. Not cool.

Team sports like football need a playoff system because they can only play against each other, one team at a time. A playoff tournament is the best way for them to determine a champion. We don't need this in Supercross. The best available riders line up against each other all the time. A championship is rightfully earned by performing better over the course of an entire season, not just in the last 5 races.

Maybe those of us fans who are against changing the point system are overreacting, but I think the integrity of the sport is at stake here. Fire away at the Noob if you will, but I don't want a part-time champion.

If the promoters and people like Matthes (who I am normally agree with) think having the championship clinched with two races to go is the worse thing that can happen, wait till the obvious champion gets screwed out the title due to some gimmick "Chase" and the fans begin to see the whole series as a farce. A "Chase" is a risky ploy that could go very very wrong.

Also, the whole point structure needs to be reconsidered. In NASCAR for instance, the car and set up are much more important. There is thus more variance in results for a driver. In SX, there is much less variance in results. As the same time, the point structures are much more top heavy in SX vs NASCAR. This means that one bad race, can destroy your chances, while in Nascar, it wont cost you as much, even once you are in the Chase.

As second class and poorly thought out as things are in this sport, they will probably adopt some Chase without considering the math of variance and point systems, then they will be shocked when the obvious champion gets screwed, and everyone is disgusted with the stupidity.
akillerwombat
Posts
3211
Joined
10/16/2013
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
4/29/2016 6:50pm Edited Date/Time 4/29/2016 6:59pm
If the promoters and people like Matthes (who I am normally agree with) think having the championship clinched with two races to go is the worse...
If the promoters and people like Matthes (who I am normally agree with) think having the championship clinched with two races to go is the worse thing that can happen, wait till the obvious champion gets screwed out the title due to some gimmick "Chase" and the fans begin to see the whole series as a farce. A "Chase" is a risky ploy that could go very very wrong.

Also, the whole point structure needs to be reconsidered. In NASCAR for instance, the car and set up are much more important. There is thus more variance in results for a driver. In SX, there is much less variance in results. As the same time, the point structures are much more top heavy in SX vs NASCAR. This means that one bad race, can destroy your chances, while in Nascar, it wont cost you as much, even once you are in the Chase.

As second class and poorly thought out as things are in this sport, they will probably adopt some Chase without considering the math of variance and point systems, then they will be shocked when the obvious champion gets screwed, and everyone is disgusted with the stupidity.
Nearly every broadcast sport: Football, Soccer, Baseball, Basketball, Hockey, Bowling, Darts, NASCAR, Tennis, Golf, etc use a variation of a Chase format: regular season, playoffs, championship, and such because it's essentially tournament format. I would assume for SX that few races would amount to single "game" of other sports but even then with sports like Baseball and Basketball we have "best of 7" so even then it doesn't come down to a single game.

I would be curious to know how many teams have been "screwed" out of a Championship. I feel like it's almost always a battle to the end and the winner is pretty much always the true Champion.

All said I think people are failing to recognize that we basically see a mini-Chase format every weekend:
The best times in practice get move on. (Regular Season)
The winners from from the heats / semi's / lcqs move on. (Post Season)
The winners race in the mains (Championship)

Now how often do people like Dungey and Roczen get dethroned by someone that doesn't belong there?
Crush
Posts
21077
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney AU
4/29/2016 10:29pm
If the promoters and people like Matthes (who I am normally agree with) think having the championship clinched with two races to go is the worse...
If the promoters and people like Matthes (who I am normally agree with) think having the championship clinched with two races to go is the worse thing that can happen, wait till the obvious champion gets screwed out the title due to some gimmick "Chase" and the fans begin to see the whole series as a farce. A "Chase" is a risky ploy that could go very very wrong.

Also, the whole point structure needs to be reconsidered. In NASCAR for instance, the car and set up are much more important. There is thus more variance in results for a driver. In SX, there is much less variance in results. As the same time, the point structures are much more top heavy in SX vs NASCAR. This means that one bad race, can destroy your chances, while in Nascar, it wont cost you as much, even once you are in the Chase.

As second class and poorly thought out as things are in this sport, they will probably adopt some Chase without considering the math of variance and point systems, then they will be shocked when the obvious champion gets screwed, and everyone is disgusted with the stupidity.
So what if that happens though? What happens, Vital will meltdown? Wait till James crashes into someone again, it'll happen then too.

The manufacturers won't pull out, the sponsors will get coverage, the TV people will have some controversy and excitement and maybe one rider will be pissed. Which happens every damn week for something or other. Who fucking cares. The world won't end. It really won't.
gnarwhip
Posts
1969
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
4/30/2016 11:22am
Seems like a dumb idea to me. The best part is we will have to hear Ralph explain how it works every week. Oh and it's gonna be super cool to have them mention that MC's 7 titles were pre-chase so they don't really count anymore and they'll have an asterisk next to his name. Such a stupid idea
ando
Posts
4181
Joined
8/20/2009
Location
Perth AU
4/30/2016 11:36am
If the championship is too often being decided well in advance of the final round, the real root cause of the problem is that the series is too long.

The longer the series, the more likely that a dominant rider will win, and that they'll build up an insurmountable points lead well before the end.
akillerwombat
Posts
3211
Joined
10/16/2013
Location
Los Angeles, CA US
4/30/2016 11:41am
ando wrote:
If the championship is too often being decided well in advance of the final round, the real root cause of the problem is that the series...
If the championship is too often being decided well in advance of the final round, the real root cause of the problem is that the series is too long.

The longer the series, the more likely that a dominant rider will win, and that they'll build up an insurmountable points lead well before the end.
I agree.

But do you shorten the series by number of times we show it on TV (number of races) or shorten it by condensing the points at a few different positions essentially shortening the series into stages?
4/30/2016 12:01pm
ando wrote:
If the championship is too often being decided well in advance of the final round, the real root cause of the problem is that the series...
If the championship is too often being decided well in advance of the final round, the real root cause of the problem is that the series is too long.

The longer the series, the more likely that a dominant rider will win, and that they'll build up an insurmountable points lead well before the end.
True, but I guess this is one reason that I just have a hard time supporting any kind of Chase format. What is the reasoning behind it? One guy is doing too good, so let's artificially reset the points and make him really earn it?

I'm sorry, but it's just a gimmick that is being implemented at the expense of true competition. In my opinion, they would do better to entertain us by finding ways to make the racing more exciting each night. Resetting the points is the wrong solution.
Indy mxer
Posts
1836
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
The Villages, FL US
4/30/2016 2:11pm
ando wrote:
If the championship is too often being decided well in advance of the final round, the real root cause of the problem is that the series...
If the championship is too often being decided well in advance of the final round, the real root cause of the problem is that the series is too long.

The longer the series, the more likely that a dominant rider will win, and that they'll build up an insurmountable points lead well before the end.
True, but I guess this is one reason that I just have a hard time supporting any kind of Chase format. What is the reasoning behind...
True, but I guess this is one reason that I just have a hard time supporting any kind of Chase format. What is the reasoning behind it? One guy is doing too good, so let's artificially reset the points and make him really earn it?

I'm sorry, but it's just a gimmick that is being implemented at the expense of true competition. In my opinion, they would do better to entertain us by finding ways to make the racing more exciting each night. Resetting the points is the wrong solution.
By that logic all sports should end after the regular season, since you're basically saying playoffs are a gimmick.
Just give the team with the best record the championship.

I know a lot of people on here don't follow NASCAR.
But I do, and when they announced the chase it was the same "the sky is falling/change is bad" bullshit.
It turned out to be a real success. The drivers race like hell to get into the chase, then it's a dog fight all the way to the end. Some of the best racing I've seen has been since they invented the chase.

What if it turns out to be a better system for SX and makes the season more exciting?
Hell, lets give it a try.
Jimmy_Sloan
Posts
1424
Joined
9/20/2015
Location
Oak Harbor, WA US
4/30/2016 2:28pm
Indy mxer wrote:
By that logic all sports should end after the regular season, since you're basically saying playoffs are a gimmick. Just give the team with the best...
By that logic all sports should end after the regular season, since you're basically saying playoffs are a gimmick.
Just give the team with the best record the championship.

I know a lot of people on here don't follow NASCAR.
But I do, and when they announced the chase it was the same "the sky is falling/change is bad" bullshit.
It turned out to be a real success. The drivers race like hell to get into the chase, then it's a dog fight all the way to the end. Some of the best racing I've seen has been since they invented the chase.

What if it turns out to be a better system for SX and makes the season more exciting?
Hell, lets give it a try.
Let's not give it a try and say we did.
4/30/2016 2:54pm
Indy mxer wrote:
By that logic all sports should end after the regular season, since you're basically saying playoffs are a gimmick. Just give the team with the best...
By that logic all sports should end after the regular season, since you're basically saying playoffs are a gimmick.
Just give the team with the best record the championship.

I know a lot of people on here don't follow NASCAR.
But I do, and when they announced the chase it was the same "the sky is falling/change is bad" bullshit.
It turned out to be a real success. The drivers race like hell to get into the chase, then it's a dog fight all the way to the end. Some of the best racing I've seen has been since they invented the chase.

What if it turns out to be a better system for SX and makes the season more exciting?
Hell, lets give it a try.
I'll give you a few of reasons why I don't believe the playoffs in team sports are analogous to Supercross.

1) In team sports, the regular season has to be used for seeding of the playoff round. In the NFL, there are over 30 teams. But everybody only plays a 16 game schedule. You can't be a champion if you don't have to beat everybody else. So, what about the NBA, NHL and MLB? They play against everybody else in the league during the regular season, but at least they each require a playoff series to advance. It's not just one and done for their championship. It takes another 15 wins or so in the playoffs to win a championship.

2) In team sports, they can only play against one other team at a time. The only fair way to determine a champion is to set up a playoff tournament.

3) In team sports, non-playoff team cannot affect the outcome. You didn't see some hapless defensive tackle from the Detroit Lions chasing after Payton Manning in the Super Bowl because he was sitting at home watching in on TV. Here, we're going to have non-chase qualified riders getting in the way.

4) NASCAR sources tacitly admitted that they only really came up with their Chase as a way to keep people interested in watching after football season started - they didn't do it for competitive integrity.



Falcon
Posts
12231
Joined
11/16/2011
Location
Menifee, CA US
4/30/2016 3:13pm
I don't like a chase format. Not because I'm a crochety, old-time traditionalist, but because it hurts the guy who suffers the most so he can be the champ.
Motocross (and Supercross, by extension,) is a sport of speed, skill and ENDURANCE. Not just enduring 20 laps, but enduring 20 laps on seventeen evenings. The mindset, prep, and yes, luck required to make it that far are part of the attraction, and don't tell me that the next few races will be boring just because there isn't a championship on the line anymore. I'll be watching, and so will most or all of you.
A chase format greatly reduces the importance of being a 100% badass and it will undo the importance of hard work, perseverance and dedication.

NotCore
Posts
741
Joined
8/9/2011
Location
Alpharetta, GA US
4/30/2016 4:06pm Edited Date/Time 4/30/2016 4:07pm
Crush wrote:
So what if that happens though? What happens, Vital will meltdown? Wait till James crashes into someone again, it'll happen then too. The manufacturers won't pull...
So what if that happens though? What happens, Vital will meltdown? Wait till James crashes into someone again, it'll happen then too.

The manufacturers won't pull out, the sponsors will get coverage, the TV people will have some controversy and excitement and maybe one rider will be pissed. Which happens every damn week for something or other. Who fucking cares. The world won't end. It really won't.
You seem to care quite a bit, for someone that keeps repeating, 'who fucking cares'.

I get that you won't change your mind. No worries bro. Time will tell.
Crush
Posts
21077
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney AU
4/30/2016 4:24pm
ando wrote:
If the championship is too often being decided well in advance of the final round, the real root cause of the problem is that the series...
If the championship is too often being decided well in advance of the final round, the real root cause of the problem is that the series is too long.

The longer the series, the more likely that a dominant rider will win, and that they'll build up an insurmountable points lead well before the end.
Dungey had basically a race lead by round 5. I don't think Feld will drop a single race, let alone 12.
Indy mxer
Posts
1836
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
The Villages, FL US
4/30/2016 4:27pm
Indy mxer wrote:
By that logic all sports should end after the regular season, since you're basically saying playoffs are a gimmick. Just give the team with the best...
By that logic all sports should end after the regular season, since you're basically saying playoffs are a gimmick.
Just give the team with the best record the championship.

I know a lot of people on here don't follow NASCAR.
But I do, and when they announced the chase it was the same "the sky is falling/change is bad" bullshit.
It turned out to be a real success. The drivers race like hell to get into the chase, then it's a dog fight all the way to the end. Some of the best racing I've seen has been since they invented the chase.

What if it turns out to be a better system for SX and makes the season more exciting?
Hell, lets give it a try.
I'll give you a few of reasons why I don't believe the playoffs in team sports are analogous to Supercross. 1) In team sports, the regular...
I'll give you a few of reasons why I don't believe the playoffs in team sports are analogous to Supercross.

1) In team sports, the regular season has to be used for seeding of the playoff round. In the NFL, there are over 30 teams. But everybody only plays a 16 game schedule. You can't be a champion if you don't have to beat everybody else. So, what about the NBA, NHL and MLB? They play against everybody else in the league during the regular season, but at least they each require a playoff series to advance. It's not just one and done for their championship. It takes another 15 wins or so in the playoffs to win a championship.

2) In team sports, they can only play against one other team at a time. The only fair way to determine a champion is to set up a playoff tournament.

3) In team sports, non-playoff team cannot affect the outcome. You didn't see some hapless defensive tackle from the Detroit Lions chasing after Payton Manning in the Super Bowl because he was sitting at home watching in on TV. Here, we're going to have non-chase qualified riders getting in the way.

4) NASCAR sources tacitly admitted that they only really came up with their Chase as a way to keep people interested in watching after football season started - they didn't do it for competitive integrity.



1. Playoffs work in all sports. See golf and NASCAR, and oh yeah AX. And I don't think it's going to be a 1 and done.

2. In baseball they play pretty much everyone. Then they basically erase the 162 games played and start over.

3. You can always find exceptions. Nothing is perfect

4. Hello! Isn't that why all sports have playoffs? To create excitement and drama? God knows SX could use some late in the series

Competitive integrity? So when the Patriots (who I hate) go 16-0 and don't win it all, thats ok. But if we crown a regular season champ in SX and a chase winner that's not fair? Or like last year when the Cubs and the Pirates beat the hell out of each other all season long and had some of the best records in baseball, then get paired up in the 1 and done wildcard game. It was exciting as hell but I felt bad for the Pirates. Just part of it.
SF45
Posts
438
Joined
5/7/2013
Location
Bay Area, CA US
4/30/2016 4:34pm
Yeah, I think people are over reacting, BIG time. The horrors you are imagining aren't going to happen. Wait until you see a season then if it sucks they will switch back.
Indy mxer
Posts
1836
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
The Villages, FL US
4/30/2016 4:45pm
SF45 wrote:
Yeah, I think people are over reacting, BIG time. The horrors you are imagining aren't going to happen. Wait until you see a season then if...
Yeah, I think people are over reacting, BIG time. The horrors you are imagining aren't going to happen. Wait until you see a season then if it sucks they will switch back.
Exactly!!
No one has been able to answer, or doesn't want to answer my simple question.
What if it works?
Crush
Posts
21077
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney AU
4/30/2016 5:09pm Edited Date/Time 4/30/2016 5:10pm
Crush wrote:
So what if that happens though? What happens, Vital will meltdown? Wait till James crashes into someone again, it'll happen then too. The manufacturers won't pull...
So what if that happens though? What happens, Vital will meltdown? Wait till James crashes into someone again, it'll happen then too.

The manufacturers won't pull out, the sponsors will get coverage, the TV people will have some controversy and excitement and maybe one rider will be pissed. Which happens every damn week for something or other. Who fucking cares. The world won't end. It really won't.
NotCore wrote:
You seem to care quite a bit, for someone that keeps repeating, 'who fucking cares'. I get that you won't change your mind. No worries bro...
You seem to care quite a bit, for someone that keeps repeating, 'who fucking cares'.

I get that you won't change your mind. No worries bro. Time will tell.
Way to change the subject to ignore the point, bro.

If all you want to see is what we have, that's ok, but it's pretty ridiculous to suggest it upsetting a single-yet-in-theory-different-rider in any season, or that a potential ensuing controversy and fan discussion are reasons not to change.

75% of the time SX is a runaway. How is that good entertainment? How does that draw anyone, new or old in? Why not change when it's already a 45 second shit show and you have another series, that realistically appeals to the core fans only?

Even if every vitard hated it, but the controversy and talking points meant media mentions improved, sponsors are happy, the TV people see a reason to really pay for tv coverage, help the promoters etc, then that's all actually an improvement on 40 years of formulaic results, story lines and promotion strategies.

No one would argue Regal wasn't legitamate last year in AX, or that Faith isn't deserving this year.. and the Hayes pass was setup because of the tights point racing. It was a crazy event, got their best coverage etc. That's great!

People talk about wanting to grow the sport but there is never any real change. Bikes are more expensive than ever, people are more aware about the dangers of dirtbikes, and there is a saying about expecting different results yet doing the same things.

It might be shithouse, it might not work but then you try something else... it might not matter because we have a fucking podium robot on a KTM out there, but fuck, try something. If this is the catalyst to change, then go ahead, you can always change it back.
JPT
Posts
7209
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Cedar Falls, IA US
4/30/2016 5:09pm
SF45 wrote:
Yeah, I think people are over reacting, BIG time. The horrors you are imagining aren't going to happen. Wait until you see a season then if...
Yeah, I think people are over reacting, BIG time. The horrors you are imagining aren't going to happen. Wait until you see a season then if it sucks they will switch back.
Indy mxer wrote:
Exactly!!
No one has been able to answer, or doesn't want to answer my simple question.
What if it works?
Who gets to decide it sucks? Big corps are so good at admitting they screwed up.The riders won't be able to speak out against it, negative tweets won't make the show, Ralph and Fro will be required to declare it a success, don't kid yourself. There is no legitimate method to gauge success in this.
NotCore
Posts
741
Joined
8/9/2011
Location
Alpharetta, GA US
4/30/2016 5:18pm
Crush wrote:
So what if that happens though? What happens, Vital will meltdown? Wait till James crashes into someone again, it'll happen then too. The manufacturers won't pull...
So what if that happens though? What happens, Vital will meltdown? Wait till James crashes into someone again, it'll happen then too.

The manufacturers won't pull out, the sponsors will get coverage, the TV people will have some controversy and excitement and maybe one rider will be pissed. Which happens every damn week for something or other. Who fucking cares. The world won't end. It really won't.
NotCore wrote:
You seem to care quite a bit, for someone that keeps repeating, 'who fucking cares'. I get that you won't change your mind. No worries bro...
You seem to care quite a bit, for someone that keeps repeating, 'who fucking cares'.

I get that you won't change your mind. No worries bro. Time will tell.
Crush wrote:
Way to change the subject to ignore the point, bro. If all you want to see is what we have, that's ok, but it's pretty ridiculous...
Way to change the subject to ignore the point, bro.

If all you want to see is what we have, that's ok, but it's pretty ridiculous to suggest it upsetting a single-yet-in-theory-different-rider in any season, or that a potential ensuing controversy and fan discussion are reasons not to change.

75% of the time SX is a runaway. How is that good entertainment? How does that draw anyone, new or old in? Why not change when it's already a 45 second shit show and you have another series, that realistically appeals to the core fans only?

Even if every vitard hated it, but the controversy and talking points meant media mentions improved, sponsors are happy, the TV people see a reason to really pay for tv coverage, help the promoters etc, then that's all actually an improvement on 40 years of formulaic results, story lines and promotion strategies.

No one would argue Regal wasn't legitamate last year in AX, or that Faith isn't deserving this year.. and the Hayes pass was setup because of the tights point racing. It was a crazy event, got their best coverage etc. That's great!

People talk about wanting to grow the sport but there is never any real change. Bikes are more expensive than ever, people are more aware about the dangers of dirtbikes, and there is a saying about expecting different results yet doing the same things.

It might be shithouse, it might not work but then you try something else... it might not matter because we have a fucking podium robot on a KTM out there, but fuck, try something. If this is the catalyst to change, then go ahead, you can always change it back.
Change the subject? At least you are being very consistent with the 'who fucking cares' argument. You've been making the same point for 7 pages now.

Post a reply to: 3 on 3 and the Chase: A clue this is actually going to happen?

The Latest