Active shooter in Roseburg Oregon

J.F.S
Posts
4383
Joined
10/20/2008
Location
Stockholm, SE
10/3/2015 7:43am Edited Date/Time 10/3/2015 7:48am
I think It´s is quite clear and obvious, for anyone. This shooter, an insane guy in his twenties, he owned 13 legal weapons. USA needs stricter gun laws so that insane people can not legally acquire 13 lethal weapons. I know people who hunt, I know police officers, I know a lot of people that own weapons, but no one has the arsenal this guy legally acquired.
Jimmy_Sloan
Posts
1424
Joined
9/20/2015
Location
Oak Harbor, WA, USA
10/3/2015 7:51am
CamP wrote:
Every time I hear a politician or media outlet use the term "epidemic" to describe a shooting, I want to scream. The FBI has tracked murder...
Every time I hear a politician or media outlet use the term "epidemic" to describe a shooting, I want to scream.

The FBI has tracked murder statistics since 1960. Guess what? The current murder rate in the US is the lowest it has been since 1960!

Don't tell anyone because keeping us scared buys votes, sells products and increases media ratings. It is also the perfect means for the puppet masters to disarm and control us.
How many school shootings, mall shootings, community college shootings did they have in the '60s, '70s, and '90s compared to now?

Gun related homicides peaked in the '80s and '90s and has since declined, not due to citizens owning more guns or having concealed weapons permits, but due to the decline of gang related activity and a change in the drug market away from crack/cocaine which also peaked in the '80s and '90s.

Your argument here is a bit misdirected here as well. When media outlets use the term "epidemic" they are referencing our gun related homicide rates compared to other developed countries in which ours is much higher.
Jimmy_Sloan
Posts
1424
Joined
9/20/2015
Location
Oak Harbor, WA, USA
10/3/2015 7:55am
newmann wrote:
If the anti-gunners could fix Chicago, maybe people would listen. But they can't even deal with one city yet they are going to solve the whole...
If the anti-gunners could fix Chicago, maybe people would listen. But they can't even deal with one city yet they are going to solve the whole country's problems.

I found some great prices on about 1000 rounds of 5.56, 9mm and .308 heading out to the Texas Hill Country this weekend. Beerfest in Fredericksburg! God Bless Texas...
Crash82 wrote:
The loons won't touch this Newman it makes too much sense an uses actual facts not charts from CNN! haha
Newmann's point has been addressed; having stricter gun laws in one city won't fix anything when gun carriers can just go outside the city to get a gun. Stricter gun laws need to be nationwide.
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
10/3/2015 8:00am Edited Date/Time 10/3/2015 8:06am
newmann wrote:
If the anti-gunners could fix Chicago, maybe people would listen. But they can't even deal with one city yet they are going to solve the whole...
If the anti-gunners could fix Chicago, maybe people would listen. But they can't even deal with one city yet they are going to solve the whole country's problems.

I found some great prices on about 1000 rounds of 5.56, 9mm and .308 heading out to the Texas Hill Country this weekend. Beerfest in Fredericksburg! God Bless Texas...
Crash82 wrote:
The loons won't touch this Newman it makes too much sense an uses actual facts not charts from CNN! haha
Newmann's point has been addressed; having stricter gun laws in one city won't fix anything when gun carriers can just go outside the city to get...
Newmann's point has been addressed; having stricter gun laws in one city won't fix anything when gun carriers can just go outside the city to get a gun. Stricter gun laws need to be nationwide.
There are 350 million guns out here right now. Tell us more about these nationwide stricter gun laws.

Stricter punishment for violent gun crimes seem to pretty far down the list for some though. Instead, the shooter not only gets his fifteen minutes of fame he gets 24/7 coverage for weeks on end. Inspires the next loon. Needs more bullet riddled body being drug through the street being pissed on before being set ablaze.

The Shop

newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
10/3/2015 8:02am
J.F.S wrote:
I think It´s is quite clear and obvious, for anyone. This shooter, an insane guy in his twenties, he owned 13 legal weapons. USA needs stricter...
I think It´s is quite clear and obvious, for anyone. This shooter, an insane guy in his twenties, he owned 13 legal weapons. USA needs stricter gun laws so that insane people can not legally acquire 13 lethal weapons. I know people who hunt, I know police officers, I know a lot of people that own weapons, but no one has the arsenal this guy legally acquired.
So you agree it is an insanity issue more so that a gun issue. No argument here.
J.F.S
Posts
4383
Joined
10/20/2008
Location
Stockholm, SE
10/3/2015 8:06am Edited Date/Time 10/3/2015 8:15am
J.F.S wrote:
I think It´s is quite clear and obvious, for anyone. This shooter, an insane guy in his twenties, he owned 13 legal weapons. USA needs stricter...
I think It´s is quite clear and obvious, for anyone. This shooter, an insane guy in his twenties, he owned 13 legal weapons. USA needs stricter gun laws so that insane people can not legally acquire 13 lethal weapons. I know people who hunt, I know police officers, I know a lot of people that own weapons, but no one has the arsenal this guy legally acquired.
newmann wrote:
So you agree it is an insanity issue more so that a gun issue. No argument here.
The issue is that the gun control is not strict enough, so that anyone sane or insane is given the opportunity to kill people. So it is a gun issue, because you will always have a number of insane people in a society, but you do not have to have an insane number of accessible guns in a society. The gun issue is something you can do something about. The weapon lobby is so far up peoples behinds in USA, so that some americans become totally irrational, unreasonable and totally illogical, enough so that the rest of the world is just staring in disbelief. Intelligent people talk and reason as if the were totally retarded when it comes to guns sometimes.
DE262
Posts
328
Joined
8/20/2015
Location
The bar, OR, USA
10/3/2015 8:19am
DE262 wrote:
They did allow it at that school. I grew up about 100 miles from Roseburg. It's the wild west down there- everybody has guns in that...
They did allow it at that school. I grew up about 100 miles from Roseburg.
It's the wild west down there- everybody has guns in that area.

People will never agree on this, and it's getting further away from the point of the thread.

RACERX69 wrote:
Not quite correct. They allowed CC on the campus, but not inside the buildings. A CC holder outside the building where the shooting was taking place...
Not quite correct. They allowed CC on the campus, but not inside the buildings. A CC holder outside the building where the shooting was taking place tried to go inside to intervene, but school officials wouldn't allow it.

Time for metal detectors and armed security guards at all schools.Sucks, but it's the age we now live in.
It looks like it's a grey area that nobody really knows the answer to. Private property schools vs. community colleges, on campus vs. inside buildings. Nobody wants to speak up- there always seems to be loop-hole.

The CC holder wasn't in a position to help- "he was in lock down in another room".

And does this guy know tactical procedure? how do the cops know he's a "good guy" when they show up?
If he kills someone trying to "help" does the Good Sam law cover him?

I am not anti-gun. As I said I grew up in those woods and have hunted and shot guns my whole life.

We will always have guns, but I believe that large mag handguns and assault rifles need to be regulated much tighter.

I do agree that we need detectors and armed guards at schools and the like.
lestat
Posts
1762
Joined
10/3/2008
Location
Piut, RE
10/3/2015 8:41am
@chrisrockyoz: Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but I wish mental health care were as easy to get as, say, a gun.
10/3/2015 8:49am Edited Date/Time 10/3/2015 8:49am
struth wrote:
Glad I live Australia n not American. Some of the logic of why not to ban guns is beyond belief. How many innocent children have to...
Glad I live Australia n not American.
Some of the logic of why not to ban guns is beyond belief.
How many innocent children have to die.

Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia Blink

Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming the responsible people
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
10/3/2015 8:54am
lestat wrote:
@chrisrockyoz: Maybe I'm just a dreamer, but I wish mental health care were as easy to get as, say, a gun.
I have always had to PAY for my guns. What's he trying to say again???
DPR250R
Posts
2183
Joined
9/14/2006
Location
USA
10/3/2015 9:00am
struth wrote:
Glad I live Australia n not American. Some of the logic of why not to ban guns is beyond belief. How many innocent children have to...
Glad I live Australia n not American.
Some of the logic of why not to ban guns is beyond belief.
How many innocent children have to die.

Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia :blink: Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming...
Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia Blink

Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming the responsible people
Australia

In one of his first acts as leader, Prime Minister John Howard announced major reforms to Australia's gun control laws just 12 days after 35 people died at the hands of a lone gunman wielding a military-style semi-automatic rifle at a popular tourist spot in Tasmania on April 28, 1996.

In the wave of public revulsion against what became known as the Port Arthur massacre, the move for stricter gun controls was led by Howard, who had taken office just seven weeks earlier.

He took his anti-gun campaign around the country, at one stage addressing a hostile pro-gun rally wearing a bullet-proof vest. He also oversaw a successful gun "buy-back" scheme that took some 650,000 guns out of circulation.

High-caliber rifles and shotguns were banned, licensing was tightened and remaining firearms were registered to uniform national standards -- an accomplishment regarded by many in the country as Howard's enduring legacy.

Australia has been compared to the United States for its "frontier mentality." But unlike the U.S., there is no constitutional right to bear arms and gun ownership is markedly lower.


In the years after the Port Arthur massacre, the risk of dying by gunshot in Australia fell by more than 50% -- and stayed there. A 2012 study by Andrew Leigh of Australian National University and Christine Neill of Wilfrid Laurier University also found the buyback led to a drop in firearm suicide rates of almost 80% in the following decade.
10/3/2015 9:13am
DE262 wrote:
They did allow it at that school. I grew up about 100 miles from Roseburg. It's the wild west down there- everybody has guns in that...
They did allow it at that school. I grew up about 100 miles from Roseburg.
It's the wild west down there- everybody has guns in that area.

People will never agree on this, and it's getting further away from the point of the thread.

The story I read said it was a gun free campus with one unarmed security guard.
TailSoHard
Posts
1656
Joined
10/18/2014
Location
Beer City, MI, USA
10/3/2015 9:36am Edited Date/Time 10/3/2015 11:16am
Not one person here has mentioned what actually stopped the shooter from killing more people. What actually ended the shooting?

The only difference between a fist fight, a murder, and a standoff is the number of guns involved.
jamma10
Posts
10573
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol, GB
10/3/2015 9:59am
struth wrote:
Glad I live Australia n not American. Some of the logic of why not to ban guns is beyond belief. How many innocent children have to...
Glad I live Australia n not American.
Some of the logic of why not to ban guns is beyond belief.
How many innocent children have to die.

Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia :blink: Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming...
Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia Blink

Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming the responsible people
Well there definitely haven't been 264 mass murders in Australia over the past ten months.
10/3/2015 10:28am
DE262 wrote:
They did allow it at that school. I grew up about 100 miles from Roseburg. It's the wild west down there- everybody has guns in that...
They did allow it at that school. I grew up about 100 miles from Roseburg.
It's the wild west down there- everybody has guns in that area.

People will never agree on this, and it's getting further away from the point of the thread.

RACERX69 wrote:
Not quite correct. They allowed CC on the campus, but not inside the buildings. A CC holder outside the building where the shooting was taking place...
Not quite correct. They allowed CC on the campus, but not inside the buildings. A CC holder outside the building where the shooting was taking place tried to go inside to intervene, but school officials wouldn't allow it.

Time for metal detectors and armed security guards at all schools.Sucks, but it's the age we now live in.
im sorry to say, its the country you live in, not the age, most of the the rest of the developed world does not need them
10/3/2015 10:31am
struth wrote:
Glad I live Australia n not American. Some of the logic of why not to ban guns is beyond belief. How many innocent children have to...
Glad I live Australia n not American.
Some of the logic of why not to ban guns is beyond belief.
How many innocent children have to die.

Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia :blink: Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming...
Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia Blink

Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming the responsible people
there has not been one since they made much stricter gun control laws,
Orange724
Posts
366
Joined
12/25/2010
Location
Vancouver, WA, USA
10/3/2015 10:38am
Rest in peace to the victims down in Roseburg. I hope the SOB burns in hell. It's nice to see the news and police agencies around here focus almost completely on the victims, and not mentioning much about the sick POS.

On another note about all this taking away our liberties talk:


Just got my first AR-15 today. Man this thing is a nice feeling, fun, sporty rifle. I enjoyed them in the military, and now I can at the range. Stocked up on ammo too.





The guy at the sportsman's store was saying that it's been crazy for AR's since Thursday night, some people buying multiple at the same time.

DPR250R
Posts
2183
Joined
9/14/2006
Location
USA
10/3/2015 10:44am
TailSoHard wrote:
Not one person here has mentioned what actually stopped the shooter from killing more people. What actually ended the shooting? The only difference between a fist...
Not one person here has mentioned what actually stopped the shooter from killing more people. What actually ended the shooting?

The only difference between a fist fight, a murder, and a standoff is the number of guns involved.
A vet slowed him down, then the police stopped him.
jamma10
Posts
10573
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol, GB
10/3/2015 10:56am
Orange724 wrote:
Rest in peace to the victims down in Roseburg. I hope the SOB burns in hell. It's nice to see the news and police agencies around...
Rest in peace to the victims down in Roseburg. I hope the SOB burns in hell. It's nice to see the news and police agencies around here focus almost completely on the victims, and not mentioning much about the sick POS.

On another note about all this taking away our liberties talk:


Just got my first AR-15 today. Man this thing is a nice feeling, fun, sporty rifle. I enjoyed them in the military, and now I can at the range. Stocked up on ammo too.





The guy at the sportsman's store was saying that it's been crazy for AR's since Thursday night, some people buying multiple at the same time.

And with those sales comes an increased risk to you all.

Good luck.
10/3/2015 11:02am
scott_nz wrote:
there has not been one since they made much stricter gun control laws,
The biggest thing Australia did (rightly imo) was to get serious about their licencing system - I'm all for keeping guns out of certain hands. Where I disagree with Australia and the UK laws is in the banning of certain types of firearms. In Australia (and actually I think perhaps even Canada??) they've even banned some guns for aesthetic reasons - so nothing that looks too scary i.e military. To me this makes no sense and is purely ideologically driven.
watson
Posts
712
Joined
7/15/2012
Location
Houston, TX, USA
10/3/2015 11:04am
First off, horrible atrocity that happened in Oregon. Terrible. Literally made me sick to my stomach yesterday.

How the causation of these horrors always boils down to just a gun debate is beyond me. The origin is multi-factorial; with mental health and the media "glorification" of these shooters (which is exactly what they want, and we give it to them) likely being the biggest culprits. Our perception as a society of mental health issues is archaic (and that's putting it mildly).

That said, guns do make it easier to kill more people in these scenarios. Do you really think this guy could have killed as many people if he went into that school with a katana, crossbow, or kitchen knife? He also obtained the firearms legally. To say that the easy access to weapons for the mentally ill isn't part of the problem is a total cop-out. Don't be a mouthpiece for the NRA, as they are just a lobbying body for gun manufacturers to keep their money flowing and flowing well (thus they do not always have the people's best interests in mind). For the record, I have no problem with law-abiding and mentally-sound citizens owning firearms. However, establishing the latter part is the problem as of now. There is a such thing as common-sense gun control, but we can't even get that conversation started because people will either sweep this factor of the problem under the rug entirely or only support completely unrealistic gun bans (i.e. total bans) in the United States.
TailSoHard
Posts
1656
Joined
10/18/2014
Location
Beer City, MI, USA
10/3/2015 11:12am
TailSoHard wrote:
Not one person here has mentioned what actually stopped the shooter from killing more people. What actually ended the shooting? The only difference between a fist...
Not one person here has mentioned what actually stopped the shooter from killing more people. What actually ended the shooting?

The only difference between a fist fight, a murder, and a standoff is the number of guns involved.
DPR250R wrote:
A vet slowed him down, then the police stopped him.
They shot him. With guns.
DPR250R
Posts
2183
Joined
9/14/2006
Location
USA
10/3/2015 11:18am
TailSoHard wrote:
Not one person here has mentioned what actually stopped the shooter from killing more people. What actually ended the shooting? The only difference between a fist...
Not one person here has mentioned what actually stopped the shooter from killing more people. What actually ended the shooting?

The only difference between a fist fight, a murder, and a standoff is the number of guns involved.
DPR250R wrote:
A vet slowed him down, then the police stopped him.
TailSoHard wrote:
They shot him. With guns.
So... Then guns do kill people? They are not inatimate objects?

Cause I keep hearing that guns don't kill people. People kill people. Can't have the argument both ways. Only the lefty anti gunners can do that.
10/3/2015 11:19am
struth wrote:
Glad I live Australia n not American. Some of the logic of why not to ban guns is beyond belief. How many innocent children have to...
Glad I live Australia n not American.
Some of the logic of why not to ban guns is beyond belief.
How many innocent children have to die.

Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia :blink: Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming...
Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia Blink

Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming the responsible people
jamma10 wrote:
Well there definitely haven't been 264 mass murders in Australia over the past ten months.
We have a lot more people to... 320 million compared to 23 million in Australia. School shootings are still statistically rare and gun violence is down compared to 20 years ago. The media and the Democrats would like you to think it happens once a week

CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
10/3/2015 11:21am
CamP wrote:
Every time I hear a politician or media outlet use the term "epidemic" to describe a shooting, I want to scream. The FBI has tracked murder...
Every time I hear a politician or media outlet use the term "epidemic" to describe a shooting, I want to scream.

The FBI has tracked murder statistics since 1960. Guess what? The current murder rate in the US is the lowest it has been since 1960!

Don't tell anyone because keeping us scared buys votes, sells products and increases media ratings. It is also the perfect means for the puppet masters to disarm and control us.
How many school shootings, mall shootings, community college shootings did they have in the '60s, '70s, and '90s compared to now? Gun related homicides peaked in...
How many school shootings, mall shootings, community college shootings did they have in the '60s, '70s, and '90s compared to now?

Gun related homicides peaked in the '80s and '90s and has since declined, not due to citizens owning more guns or having concealed weapons permits, but due to the decline of gang related activity and a change in the drug market away from crack/cocaine which also peaked in the '80s and '90s.

Your argument here is a bit misdirected here as well. When media outlets use the term "epidemic" they are referencing our gun related homicide rates compared to other developed countries in which ours is much higher.
Our current murder rate is the LOWEST it's been in 55 YEARS! The current problem is the media and a handful of insane wackjobs looking to become infamous!
jamma10
Posts
10573
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol, GB
10/3/2015 11:24am Edited Date/Time 10/3/2015 11:29am
Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia :blink: Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming...
Right....because there has never been mass murders in Australia Blink

Take away guns and they will find other ways. You cant stop it by simply disarming the responsible people
jamma10 wrote:
Well there definitely haven't been 264 mass murders in Australia over the past ten months.
We have a lot more people to... 320 million compared to 23 million in Australia. School shootings are still statistically rare and gun violence is down...
We have a lot more people to... 320 million compared to 23 million in Australia. School shootings are still statistically rare and gun violence is down compared to 20 years ago. The media and the Democrats would like you to think it happens once a week

Supposedly there have been 294 mass murders in the US this year alone, that's one almost every day, let alone one a week! (I was just the 30 mass murders short in my earlier post about Australia, no big deal though I guess...)

The Oregon incident was the 994th in US in three years!!!!! That's fucking ridiculous considering you're supposed to be a civilised nation.
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
10/3/2015 11:27am Edited Date/Time 10/3/2015 11:28am
jamma10 wrote:
Well there definitely haven't been 264 mass murders in Australia over the past ten months.
Not sure where you get your stats but the average number of deaths due to mass shootings in the US is 32 a year. That means you have a 1 in 10,000,000 chance of being the victim of a mass shooting in the US.

These atrocities are outrageous and senseless, but they are far from common. You are just as likely to hit the lottery as being shot by a deranged psychopath looking to make the national news.
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
10/3/2015 11:31am
The anti-gun crowd needs to study the FBI data on the following link. Mass hysteria and paranoia should not cloud anyone's judgement.

http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm
10/3/2015 11:33am
jamma10 wrote:
Supposedly there have been 294 mass murders in the US this year alone, that's one almost every day, let alone one a week! (I was just...
Supposedly there have been 294 mass murders in the US this year alone, that's one almost every day, let alone one a week! (I was just the 30 mass murders short in my earlier post about Australia, no big deal though I guess...)

The Oregon incident was the 994th in US in three years!!!!! That's fucking ridiculous considering you're supposed to be a civilised nation.
I don't think those numbers are correct man. Where did you see this? Its more like one or two "mass" shootings a year
jamma10
Posts
10573
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol, GB
10/3/2015 11:34am Edited Date/Time 10/3/2015 11:46am
jamma10 wrote:
Well there definitely haven't been 264 mass murders in Australia over the past ten months.
CamP wrote:
Not sure where you get your stats but the average number of deaths due to mass shootings in the US is 32 a year. That means...
Not sure where you get your stats but the average number of deaths due to mass shootings in the US is 32 a year. That means you have a 1 in 10,000,000 chance of being the victim of a mass shooting in the US.

These atrocities are outrageous and senseless, but they are far from common. You are just as likely to hit the lottery as being shot by a deranged psychopath looking to make the national news.
This website defines a mass shooting as; 'when four or more people are shot in an event'

http://shootingtracker.com/wiki/Mass_Shootings_in_2015

Edit - 294 was the total number of incidents where a multiple number of people were killed OR wounded, so I should rephrase what I wrote to 'mass shootings' rather than mass murders. But that doesn't make them any less serious IMO.

http://shootingtracker.com/wiki/Main_Page

Post a reply to: Active shooter in Roseburg Oregon

The Latest