Someone pleeeese field a 2-stroke rider in SX!

WORCSRacer
Posts
2295
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Clovis, CA, USA
11/15/2008 9:57am Edited Date/Time 11/15/2008 10:16am
WORCSRacer wrote:
The best thing about all this 2 stroke talk is that nobody goes out and buys them. You know who killed the two stroke? The people...
The best thing about all this 2 stroke talk is that nobody goes out and buys them. You know who killed the two stroke? The people who actually buy bikes.
OW38B wrote:
The AMA killed the 2 stroke with affirmative action for the four stroke.............still going on today, With most bikes racing today four strokes, why do they...
The AMA killed the 2 stroke with affirmative action for the four stroke.............still going on today,

With most bikes racing today four strokes, why do they still get double the displacement advantage?

There's a reason the AMA cleaned house this year,,,,,,,,they are all goobers.
The AMA killed the two stroke? Last time I checked very few people earn a living racing bikes. In the largest market for Dirtbikes, California, the AMA is a non factor. If displacement was a huge advantage open class bike would be all the rage but you know what nobody bought those either. Ifyou are paying the bills and a bike is simple, cheap and more fun to ride... it should be a best seller right? Apparently not.
Xracer
Posts
527
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/15/2008 10:03am
What's the two stroke fascination? I grew up on two-strokes and they are definitely fun to ride, but as soon as I hopped on a YZ426...
What's the two stroke fascination? I grew up on two-strokes and they are definitely fun to ride, but as soon as I hopped on a YZ426 I was in love. Plus, four strokes sound meaner and thus cooler.
I switched to a 4-stroke because as a intermediate rider, it made me faster and safer. I love riding them on a track, but I kept a 2-stroke for everything else and I occasionally ride it at the track also. It takes boatloads more skill and stamina to ride, so I guess that's why I like watching the elite riders on them...I can't fathom the skill it takes to get one around a track that fast. I get that 4 strokes are superior race platforms, but....you know......zzzzzzzzzzzzz.

The question is: Is racing for the racers, the manufadcturers, or for the fans? I think that most would agree that Supercross, like NASCAR, is a "show" and as such, the Fans should get what they want. The racing and the experience of going to one just isn't as good as it was pre-4-stroke, and I think the attendance numbers back that up. NASCAR could put huge mufflers on the cars that would allow them to produce the same horsepower, but they know that would be suicide....people like the sound of Thunder. I've noticed that the NHL is quietly allowing fighting again, as the anti-fighting rules nearly made the sport extinct. I hope SX figures out what the fans want, and sooner than later.

I guess if the object is to make the bikes get around a track as fast as possible, they should maybe put them all on rails and propel them with electromagnets. Woo. Hoo. And why does Formula1 car racing stick with those screaming little finicky, peaky 20,000rpm turbocharged engines when they could just shoehorn in a big-block Chevy. Sure, they'd be heavier....but they'd hook up and everyone could drive them fast. Wow.
Xracer
Posts
527
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/15/2008 10:14am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 9:13pm
Last year I showed up early in Atlanta and witnessed RC pegging an RM250 around the track. Was music to the ears... two strokes are still...
Last year I showed up early in Atlanta and witnessed RC pegging an RM250 around the track. Was music to the ears...


two strokes are still alive in the amateurs, for sure! Plenty of power to still be competitive.
Spinner wrote:
Sure, when the rules are changed, the two strokes can be competitive. I think with the OEM's dumping the technologically inferior pieces of shit are a...
Sure, when the rules are changed, the two strokes can be competitive.

I think with the OEM's dumping the technologically inferior pieces of shit are a sign of the times.
Technologically inferior? I remember reading that RC's 02' CR250 made somewhere between 52 and 55hp. From 250cc's. Explain technical superiority to me...I'm confused.

And if Technical Superiority is the goal and there is no regard for ease of maintenance and overhaul costs, then why aren't we using jet turbines or some sort of fusion-based powerplants? Turbos? Superchargers? Hell, the most R&D is going into electric power these days - let's go that route.

WORCSRacer
Posts
2295
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Clovis, CA, USA
11/15/2008 10:14am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 9:13pm
Xracer wrote:
I switched to a 4-stroke because as a intermediate rider, it made me faster and safer. I love riding them on a track, but I kept...
I switched to a 4-stroke because as a intermediate rider, it made me faster and safer. I love riding them on a track, but I kept a 2-stroke for everything else and I occasionally ride it at the track also. It takes boatloads more skill and stamina to ride, so I guess that's why I like watching the elite riders on them...I can't fathom the skill it takes to get one around a track that fast. I get that 4 strokes are superior race platforms, but....you know......zzzzzzzzzzzzz.

The question is: Is racing for the racers, the manufadcturers, or for the fans? I think that most would agree that Supercross, like NASCAR, is a "show" and as such, the Fans should get what they want. The racing and the experience of going to one just isn't as good as it was pre-4-stroke, and I think the attendance numbers back that up. NASCAR could put huge mufflers on the cars that would allow them to produce the same horsepower, but they know that would be suicide....people like the sound of Thunder. I've noticed that the NHL is quietly allowing fighting again, as the anti-fighting rules nearly made the sport extinct. I hope SX figures out what the fans want, and sooner than later.

I guess if the object is to make the bikes get around a track as fast as possible, they should maybe put them all on rails and propel them with electromagnets. Woo. Hoo. And why does Formula1 car racing stick with those screaming little finicky, peaky 20,000rpm turbocharged engines when they could just shoehorn in a big-block Chevy. Sure, they'd be heavier....but they'd hook up and everyone could drive them fast. Wow.
SX racing has been boring since 1994 the beginning of the MC era (and the beginning of BMX style SX tracks) who by the way was riding a two stroke as was every other SX Champion for the next 12 years.... Four strokes didn't make the racing boring MC, RC, CR and now JS did.


You want to make SX racing better? Tighten up the corners, tame the jumps and remove the whoops. Sure it will be boring for the top guys but it will be much tighter racing for the fans who by the way pay the bills.

The Shop

Jonezy
Posts
20
Joined
5/25/2008
Location
S4a2a3, CA
11/15/2008 11:33am
Does anyone remember James Stewart in `04 on his KX125? He really showed everyone how fast you can really go on one of those things. Until you can ride a 2-stroke as fast as that, and you need some kind of power advantage to go even faster, then you don`t need a four-stroke! The fact is, if you could ride a 125 at that speed, you could still do top 5 in outdoor nationals, probably better. Noone can tell me that the current top 5 (maybe villopoto is an exception) are riding there four strokes as fast as James rode that 125. And plus, they are dirt cheap right now, funner to ride, and a blind 5 year old with down syndrome could do a top end.
Bottom line is, people need to realize that unless you are trying to win a national championship, YOU DONT need one. We (the buyers) really are the ones who stopped production of the 2-stroke, not the ama. WE stopped buying them, so THEY stopped making them.
11/15/2008 12:16pm Edited Date/Time 11/15/2008 12:19pm
Jonezy wrote:
Does anyone remember James Stewart in `04 on his KX125? He really showed everyone how fast you can really go on one of those things. Until...
Does anyone remember James Stewart in `04 on his KX125? He really showed everyone how fast you can really go on one of those things. Until you can ride a 2-stroke as fast as that, and you need some kind of power advantage to go even faster, then you don`t need a four-stroke! The fact is, if you could ride a 125 at that speed, you could still do top 5 in outdoor nationals, probably better. Noone can tell me that the current top 5 (maybe villopoto is an exception) are riding there four strokes as fast as James rode that 125. And plus, they are dirt cheap right now, funner to ride, and a blind 5 year old with down syndrome could do a top end.
Bottom line is, people need to realize that unless you are trying to win a national championship, YOU DONT need one. We (the buyers) really are the ones who stopped production of the 2-stroke, not the ama. WE stopped buying them, so THEY stopped making them.
But see the point is no every one CAN ride a two stroke like that. With the coming of the four stroke and its power characteristics most of the people could play on an even playing field. It is evident even now, some people ride 450s better than 250Fs, because they don't have to ride over their head and there is so much on tap if needed.

I have to admit, I grew up around two strokes, rode two strokes, except for the occasional XR and XT or TT dirtbikes, but the first time I heard a racing 426 on track, it was something new and yes, MEAN sounding!! You would here all these bees go by and then bass boom of the 426 or the 250F when it came on later, it was awesome!!
11/15/2008 2:40pm
I still have a 2 stroke that I race locally. 06 Honda 250
WORCSRacer
Posts
2295
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Clovis, CA, USA
11/15/2008 11:47pm
I still have a 2 stroke that I race locally. 06 Honda 250
Really? Funny you didn't post a pic of you racing that bike for your avatar....
AJ
Posts
933
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lowell, IN, USA
11/16/2008 1:10am
well i have plenty of pics of racing /riding 2 strokes Smile

worcs - lol man-
its "funny" that you like KTMs, but dont mention they made a big comittment to developing and building the two strokes ,
and that is one of the big reasons they are the major player in woods racing..
KTM cant seem to keep the 2 stroke models they make in stock..

"funny" for those acting like its completyely "dead"
.Wink

for a dead bike, in the mid west and east, you'll see more 2 strokes at any given HS race than anything else.

perhaps not in the west,,

anyone checked your local dealers sales of 4 strokes last year and this year?
a bet he is thrilled at the sales numbers..
i know the OEMs are.

of course they arnt selling 2 strokes ,few even offer them,
(how many new 09 YZ250's can you find and buy?
i bet i can sell everyone yamaha sends me,, what you like to wager? Wink )

the harsh truth is,, in general dirt bike sales,
nothing sold much last year, and less this year.. for your average local dealer.

we did decent on most dirt bikes actually, (but that wasnt the case for most dealerships i'm afraid) and we did great,,on a couple wacky two stroke models.

i certainly recognize that many of the OEM's arnt going to mass produce a
2 stroke bike now,
and certainly not in a climate were they cant even sell what they've marketed so hard for a several years in any quantity they'ed consider decent..

Honda did not even have a dealer convention this year,, first time in forever..
and only an online "intro" of the *hottest new thing*.. in their dirtbike world.?
I bet it was because they were expecting untold thousands of 09 CRF450R sales right?

if your logic is that the public quite buying them (2 strokes)
so the OEMs stopped making them..

thats hard to debate, its true!!
(now wether marketing, hype, or truly a better mousetrap did it, is the debate?)

but i'm looking at a few green red and yellow, EFI 08/09 models sitting here ,
that based on sales, they may not make anymore either.. Wink

so ultimately,
you're right.
i just wouldnt gloat much about it Wink

with what the OEMs are selling world wide,
expect less models offered in any engine configuration.

i don't really see that as anything positive.







WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
USA
11/16/2008 4:16am
It's odd to me that motocross is a sport in a big time decline right now because of the risk and cost. And the way to alleviate that is to produce a motorcycle that is cheaper to buy, cheaper to ride and makes a lot less noise - and that's the exact type of motorcycle that factories have largely phased out in favor of one that is more expensive to buy, more expensive to ride and is much louder. People all over the country are griping that American car manufacturers did a poor job of anticipating their markets - well, Japanese motorcycle manufacturers didn't do such a great job either.

The future of the sport has to be less expense and less risk. It has to be two strokes on tracks with few do-or-die obstacles or it's going to be some very lean times coming up. In most economic downturns, there are some parts of the world that are doing well and some parts that aren't, so factories still have some areas where sales are normal - in this case, no parts of the world are doing very well, and that is going to go on for a year or two; and during that time, motorcycle sales are going to be very poor. Just like normal people cut back on luxuries and figure out how to cut spending to core functions only, motorcycle manufacturers are going to do the same thing - and if they're warehousing a bunch of '09 CRF450Rs that cost a lot to build and have low markup, they may decide to make the '010 CRF450R a BNG year, make very few of them, and if things don't turn around, maybe not build any '011s at all.
AJ
Posts
933
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lowell, IN, USA
11/16/2008 10:26am
sam,
as far as in the realm of just dirt bikes, the US is such a large percentage of the world market that it really drives the models made ,how many etc.

i'm not all gloom and doom.. even though my post may have come off that way...lol
certainly stepping up, not back.

i have several new bikes to release,in the near future ,
and yeah mostly 2 stroke.
KX250AF and AFX version (as well as a 300 model)
RM250AF and AFX version (as well as 300 model)

i'll likely toy with the idea of ordering up all the new parts and
putting the nice 96/ or 01 CR250 engine i nthe 09 CRF250R (and X) chassis
just for fun..

and release a big bore yamaha..
YZ300



TerryB
Posts
2830
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Cambridge, MN, USA
11/16/2008 1:14pm
AJ, I assume the RM250AF will be using the 250F chassis?

If the financial Gods smile upon me, I'll be on your build list.

The bikes you build, are proof-positive that there is still a market for building 2-strokes with the latest chassis and suspension technology.
AJ
Posts
933
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lowell, IN, USA
11/16/2008 3:31pm
terryb -
thanks and yes it will be on a new RMZ250 chassis.

while kind of known for 2 strokes,
I do build 4 stroke models as well when i see a niche market..
Smile

I think an RM250AF (or 300) would be a great handling bike,and great all around bike for many riding situations.

thats just me.. we'll see how it goes..Wink

in the meantime , its fun stuff ? Smile



lumpy790
Posts
11623
Joined
9/18/2007
Location
York, SC, USA
11/16/2008 4:14pm
WORCSRacer wrote:
The best thing about all this 2 stroke talk is that nobody goes out and buys them. You know who killed the two stroke? The people...
The best thing about all this 2 stroke talk is that nobody goes out and buys them. You know who killed the two stroke? The people who actually buy bikes.
OW38B wrote:
The AMA killed the 2 stroke with affirmative action for the four stroke.............still going on today, With most bikes racing today four strokes, why do they...
The AMA killed the 2 stroke with affirmative action for the four stroke.............still going on today,

With most bikes racing today four strokes, why do they still get double the displacement advantage?

There's a reason the AMA cleaned house this year,,,,,,,,they are all goobers.
You really should know the history of the rules. The 4 stroke displacement rules were written and in the rule books from the 70's to give the heavy and slow 4 strokes an advantage. Yamaha was smart enough to create the technology and change the sport and the others followed.

I still ride/race a 2001 YZ250.

Back to the OP.......why would a professional rider put himself at a huge disadvantage and attempt to race a 2 smoker?
Adam43
Posts
3311
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
WF
11/16/2008 4:28pm
WORCSRacer wrote:
The best thing about all this 2 stroke talk is that nobody goes out and buys them. You know who killed the two stroke? The people...
The best thing about all this 2 stroke talk is that nobody goes out and buys them. You know who killed the two stroke? The people who actually buy bikes.
The central problem with just sticking with a two-stroke is that no one who is remotely serious about their racing is willing to put themselves at an immediate, if even slight, disadvantage.

I love two-strokes, I truly do. I raced them for many years and well past the point when everyone else switched to the thumper. The fact is that the AMA and other sanctioning bodies adopted these rules packages and have put the 2-strokes at large competitive disadvantage. Unless things are brought back closer to equal, no one will be willing to handicap themselves just for fun's sake. It may already be too late.
Adam43
Posts
3311
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
WF
11/16/2008 4:33pm
lumpy790 wrote:
You really should know the history of the rules. The 4 stroke displacement rules were written and in the rule books from the 70's to give...
You really should know the history of the rules. The 4 stroke displacement rules were written and in the rule books from the 70's to give the heavy and slow 4 strokes an advantage. Yamaha was smart enough to create the technology and change the sport and the others followed.

I still ride/race a 2001 YZ250.

Back to the OP.......why would a professional rider put himself at a huge disadvantage and attempt to race a 2 smoker?
You yourself should know the history of the rules. While there were rules allowing 4-strokes a displacement advantage for decades, the limit was actually increased to 550cc in the late 1990's to encourage development.

Once Yamaha built the first YZFs and were immediately competitive at only 400cc, it was realized 550cc was too high at the displacement rule was lowered to 450cc at the end of the 2002 season. (Remember the pack of 540cc KTMs in '02 that ran really strong with Dowd, Cooper, Carpenter, etc?)
Racer92
Posts
17965
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Central, TX, USA
11/16/2008 4:38pm
RM300AF

MMmMmmmmmmmm
lumpy790
Posts
11623
Joined
9/18/2007
Location
York, SC, USA
11/16/2008 4:47pm
lumpy790 wrote:
You really should know the history of the rules. The 4 stroke displacement rules were written and in the rule books from the 70's to give...
You really should know the history of the rules. The 4 stroke displacement rules were written and in the rule books from the 70's to give the heavy and slow 4 strokes an advantage. Yamaha was smart enough to create the technology and change the sport and the others followed.

I still ride/race a 2001 YZ250.

Back to the OP.......why would a professional rider put himself at a huge disadvantage and attempt to race a 2 smoker?
Adam43 wrote:
You yourself should know the history of the rules. While there were rules allowing 4-strokes a displacement advantage for decades, the limit was actually increased to...
You yourself should know the history of the rules. While there were rules allowing 4-strokes a displacement advantage for decades, the limit was actually increased to 550cc in the late 1990's to encourage development.

Once Yamaha built the first YZFs and were immediately competitive at only 400cc, it was realized 550cc was too high at the displacement rule was lowered to 450cc at the end of the 2002 season. (Remember the pack of 540cc KTMs in '02 that ran really strong with Dowd, Cooper, Carpenter, etc?)
Yes I knew about the rule changes.......some times the years get a little fuzzy though. Smile
WORCSRacer
Posts
2295
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Clovis, CA, USA
11/16/2008 7:47pm
AJ wrote:
well i have plenty of pics of racing /riding 2 strokes :) worcs - lol man- its "funny" that you like KTMs, but dont mention they...
well i have plenty of pics of racing /riding 2 strokes Smile

worcs - lol man-
its "funny" that you like KTMs, but dont mention they made a big comittment to developing and building the two strokes ,
and that is one of the big reasons they are the major player in woods racing..
KTM cant seem to keep the 2 stroke models they make in stock..

"funny" for those acting like its completyely "dead"
.Wink

for a dead bike, in the mid west and east, you'll see more 2 strokes at any given HS race than anything else.

perhaps not in the west,,

anyone checked your local dealers sales of 4 strokes last year and this year?
a bet he is thrilled at the sales numbers..
i know the OEMs are.

of course they arnt selling 2 strokes ,few even offer them,
(how many new 09 YZ250's can you find and buy?
i bet i can sell everyone yamaha sends me,, what you like to wager? Wink )

the harsh truth is,, in general dirt bike sales,
nothing sold much last year, and less this year.. for your average local dealer.

we did decent on most dirt bikes actually, (but that wasnt the case for most dealerships i'm afraid) and we did great,,on a couple wacky two stroke models.

i certainly recognize that many of the OEM's arnt going to mass produce a
2 stroke bike now,
and certainly not in a climate were they cant even sell what they've marketed so hard for a several years in any quantity they'ed consider decent..

Honda did not even have a dealer convention this year,, first time in forever..
and only an online "intro" of the *hottest new thing*.. in their dirtbike world.?
I bet it was because they were expecting untold thousands of 09 CRF450R sales right?

if your logic is that the public quite buying them (2 strokes)
so the OEMs stopped making them..

thats hard to debate, its true!!
(now wether marketing, hype, or truly a better mousetrap did it, is the debate?)

but i'm looking at a few green red and yellow, EFI 08/09 models sitting here ,
that based on sales, they may not make anymore either.. Wink

so ultimately,
you're right.
i just wouldnt gloat much about it Wink

with what the OEMs are selling world wide,
expect less models offered in any engine configuration.

i don't really see that as anything positive.







Ah AJ don't despair, things are going to get better!!

Funny thing, I rode KTM's all year in the WORCS and a Honda in the Baja. In WORCS races the 300 was my bike of choice. It is freaking soooo easy to ride. The biggest drawback is the fast courses like Hangtown and Taft where a 300 flat sucks and where the 505 rocks. In BAJA there really is no other choice but Honda.

Deciding what to ride in 09 was pretty easy there had to be a contingency paying two stroke in the line up... Ultimately it was a no brainer and I am now getting adjusted to what a razor sharp handling bike with a yellow front fender feels like.

The industry needs 5K to 6K dirtbikes and Japan needs to wake up and give the market RM300's, YZ300'S and KX300's. We need normal guys to see 2 strokes can be fun and cool. You can forget about Honda ever making another two stoke. That's their corporate philosophy and there sticking to it! (AJ ask them to sell you CR250 bottom ends and add a over bore cylinder!) There of course is a manufacture already making a great 300 two stroke and I have been begging the guys at KTM to add what i think would be great seller for them:

A KTM 300SX. They just don't think it would sell. I say they are wrong.

11/16/2008 8:22pm
Personally, I think a 450cc two stroke would sell, and sell rather well. It could be set up very mild and reliable, but still put out 60hp. The latest in power valve and ignition technology would keep it very tractable. Package it with a 6 speed wide ratio trans, a lightweight modern frame, with an under 220lb dry weight. Sign me up.
AJ
Posts
933
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lowell, IN, USA
11/16/2008 8:33pm
Worcs- I knew you rode the 300, thats why i was razzing you in particular..lol

Lumpy700.
Since i was an AMA congressman for a long time
(and still a district prez)
The "historonics" of how the modern 4 stroke rules and regs went down get revised with every post and year Smile

Yamaha did NOT, build a production bike that first year that met criteria.
remember this was a time of the "production rule"

The came to the AMA basically begging to let Doug ride their new prototype,
despite it not being production, or meeting criteria,
allowances were made so that they could run it ,
in hopes of developing the 4 stroke,

(now if you buy the eco friendly line, please get in a time machine and truthfully test emissions on dougs race bike, and then on any of the other 250's lined up at a nat that same year..lol)


to me th ewhole thing was incredibly ODD,
since the AMA had for years waved the sound issue flag !!!
.. less sound=more ground. add campaignes etc etc.
it was a HUGE issue and the yknew it.

and they knew very well that the new high strung breed of 4 strokes ,if allowed ,
would certainly not go in a quieter direction.
(and if they regulated them , it would kill thier development as much as displacement)

Yamaha asked for , and got, allowences that no other factory did that year.

quite ironiocally, (since it was a 400)
Since this is the same Yamaha that (and suzuki) cried to the AMA to get rid of the open class , since they dint make a bike for it.

perhaps look into who the AMA board of trustees where at those times , and the advisery committee of OEMs then Follow the money....?? just sayin...

Listen to all Yamaha fans (hey i'm a yamaha dealer as well)
I certainly dont blame Yamaha for fanagaling things to help them in thier race programs and overall sales.That ssmart business!
but they certainly did plenty of *fanagaling* .or whatever you'd like to call it..
lol

it was not just a case of
"they where smarter than everyone else and saw a opening in the rule book"
Wink









AJ
Posts
933
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lowell, IN, USA
11/16/2008 8:34pm
workin' on it matt Wink
englishman
Posts
2812
Joined
3/7/2008
Location
England, GB
11/16/2008 9:30pm Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 9:14pm
AJ
So are you saying Yamaha manipulated people, rules & governing bodies to make more money and to f**k with the consequences to the sport ?
AJ
Posts
933
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lowell, IN, USA
11/16/2008 11:58pm
They are not the only manufactuer, that might do such?
i'm not intentionally singling them out Wink
there's plenty of conspircey theories out there on lots of things lol

just the case in point, I feel they had just a bit more to do with it, than what was posted here.. but hey i'm just another silly opinion ,on the I'net, of all places Wink

CR250Rider
Posts
6706
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Moses Lake, WA, USA
11/17/2008 5:20am
300cc smoker at 205 lbs would sell great.
Racer92
Posts
17965
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Central, TX, USA
11/17/2008 5:35am
If AJ shoe-horns a nice 300cc smoker into a RMZ250 chassis, that would get my attention.
-eagle-
Posts
1610
Joined
5/9/2008
Location
ZW
11/17/2008 6:01am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 9:14pm
1. Its bullshit that the 250t cannot compete with 250f in the pro ranks.
Especially since 250f's can race against 450's in sx.
2. I"m all for a regional/support class but it would be hard to do with 125's because they do not get imported. 250f & 250t for regional sx and the ax series.
3. A 350ish Japanese two stroke would be the berries. There has been a few threads about this on here and one option right now that someone posted:
Buy a ktm250sx and put the 300exc top end on it. I"m not sure of the compatibility but they said it would work. I would kill for a cr 300 motor in the new crf chassis.
englishman
Posts
2812
Joined
3/7/2008
Location
England, GB
11/17/2008 8:37am
AJ wrote:
They are not the only manufactuer, that might do such? i'm not intentionally singling them out ;) there's plenty of conspircey theories out there on lots...
They are not the only manufactuer, that might do such?
i'm not intentionally singling them out Wink
there's plenty of conspircey theories out there on lots of things lol

just the case in point, I feel they had just a bit more to do with it, than what was posted here.. but hey i'm just another silly opinion ,on the I'net, of all places Wink

AJ If you made enough 300 cc smokers could you get it homolugated ????Wink .
AJ
Posts
933
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lowell, IN, USA
11/17/2008 9:03am
well the 500AF is,(in AMA diciplines where a 500 2 stroke has a class)
so yes ,
if i made enoiugh of them! it wouldnt be a problem.Smile
the rule is really there, to insure timely availibilty.

if honda/yam/kaw/sux have that many bikes and that may parts in th ewharehouse to mee tthe rule,,and we have th eabilty to purchase the mas adaler and to remanufactur ethe minthe time frame, desgnated
it meets the AMA's requirements (at least to them it always has),
(as a franchised dealer, ,i dont have to wharehouse the parts if Honda
for example already is , and they are availible to me,or to th customer. )

its more a matter of bike allotment.


Post a reply to: Someone pleeeese field a 2-stroke rider in SX!

The Latest