Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
Also seems to me since they were introduced years ago we have not heard of as many riders being parylized. For awhile there it seemed like we were losing many to catostrophic injuries. Maybe that is why David Bailey spoke so highly of the benefits of the next brace. I am done with MX racing but if I or my children were still on the track there would be no doubt that we would be wearing them
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Free shipping: VITALMX
the docs but they never really seemed too bothered by it. Am I lucky it saved my neck or lucky it didn't snap my spine?!
The fucker of it is even though I saved my neck and back, the bike hit my leg so hard it damaged a nerve and paralysed my lower leg
Luckily that's recovering very slowly but it's less than ideal
I don't think there is a right or wrong with neck braces, they just change probable outcomes. They may cause damage themselves and they may stop damage from happening that would of otherwise
http://www.leatt-brace.com/product_uploads/lab_docs/LEATT_WHITE_PAPER_F…
Not necessarily, no. I'm just giving it my best guess and ultimately making a choice etc. Until we have some in-depth scientific research, that's all any individual can really do on the matter of wearing one vs not. My response was basically aimed at the post of Racer142 (not in a negative way), and this sentence especially "You can't tell me that putting a direct line from my helmet to my back is going to save my spine without it having some sort of crumple zone itself to absorb the energy otherwise it's simply going to move the energy somewhere else which I believe is why we see the collar bone injuries". As I said at the start of this post, I have no idea if that's true or not. But on the assumption that it is (and for now it does seem logical - after all that energy does have to go somewhere) then the decision does "potentially" come down to a choice of decreasing the risk of injury in one place at the expense of increasing it elsewhere.
Pit Row
Good chatting with you in Daytoner
Also, for those saying they simply transfer force, I don't think that is entirely correct. It seems like the braces are designed to flex when contacted by the helmet, rather than be a rigid block. Obviously not all force can be consumed by the brace, and will thus be transferred elsewhere, but the amount of force transferred will be reduced. At least that is how I understand it, someone more involved with braces please correct me if I'm wrong.
They will work worse in certain kinds of wrecks.
Which one are you planning on having today when you snap on that Russian Roulette wheel?
As for Mini parents,
the kid in a Leatt looks great from the side of the track. A good $400 and up helmet that actually works?
I don't see nearly as many of those as I want to.
nice husky btw i had the black tank 79 390, fun bike to race, a little hard to turn though
Post a reply to: Are neck braces outta here?