New Canadian 250 2 stroke rules.

Micahdogg
Posts
1263
Joined
1/3/2011
Location
USA
11/12/2014 7:46am
O___o wrote:
40-41? Bullshit asshole. Mitch's motors did 51 this year. Fact. Landman? Not sure if he's a moron or a bold faced liar.
That is awesome! I wondered if Mitch was making over 50HP or not. A few years ago DV12's dad was getting 54HP out of a YZ250 (the same motor for 2014). That was the bike Cedric was supposed to race in the states. And I'm sure it cost a hell of a lot less to get that 54HP than it does for Mitch to work his magic Smile Two strokes rule!
ML512
Posts
16999
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA, USA
Fantasy
11/12/2014 8:19am Edited Date/Time 11/12/2014 8:21am
"Mike Landman – Penrite Honda Racing team manager: In the Lites class, definitely not. Not a 250 two-stroke anyway, maybe a 150 or something like that...
"Mike Landman – Penrite Honda Racing team manager:
In the Lites class, definitely not. Not a 250 two-stroke anyway, maybe a 150 or something like that. A stock 250 four-stroke out of the box, is anywhere from 35, 36 to 38hp and a stock 250 two-stroke is 8-10 more horses than that. It is possible to get a 250 four-stroke to about 40 or 41hp but you can increase the power in the two-stroke as well and it’s faster to begin with. They should be in separate classes. I think that’s something that could be worked out. My concerns are with running the two together – one, is the big horsepower advantage, and two, I can see that the average person who goes to buy a bike is paying similar money for something that has 10 more hp, probably less in maintenance, and I can see it killing the 250 four-stroke class because you can’t blame people. If you’re a privateer riding in that class it’s a no brainer, you will ride a 250 two-stroke. I totally disagree with it because it’s not a fair and level playing field."

http://www.motoonline.com.au/2014/07/31/point-two-stroke-vs-four-stroke…
O___o wrote:
40-41? Bullshit asshole. Mitch's motors did 51 this year. Fact. Landman? Not sure if he's a moron or a bold faced liar.
One thing I've learned, dyno numbers are all over the place. The one I used at PC produces fairly high numbers on some stock bikes that I've run on different dyno as well. Realistically, the CRF250R isn't that strong out of the box, and I wouldn't be surprised if that's the numbers they saw on their dyno (by theirs, I mean Penrite's). Also, that Penrite team isn't going to have a modified engine that's near the level of what Pro Circuit, Factory Connection, TLD, etc. are building, so the gains are going to be smaller.

This is something to think about when complaining about the Australia and Canada rules, the teams up there aren't pulling the power out of a 250F that we see in the US or World GPs. So they aren't producing 250fs that are "trouncing" 250 2-strokes. A well jetted 2-stroke on race fuel with a good pipe combo up there, should be more than competitive against the 250Fs that are being run.
Gringoe
Posts
1586
Joined
4/12/2014
Location
MP
11/12/2014 9:49am Edited Date/Time 11/12/2014 9:50am
"Mike Landman – Penrite Honda Racing team manager: In the Lites class, definitely not. Not a 250 two-stroke anyway, maybe a 150 or something like that...
"Mike Landman – Penrite Honda Racing team manager:
In the Lites class, definitely not. Not a 250 two-stroke anyway, maybe a 150 or something like that. A stock 250 four-stroke out of the box, is anywhere from 35, 36 to 38hp and a stock 250 two-stroke is 8-10 more horses than that. It is possible to get a 250 four-stroke to about 40 or 41hp but you can increase the power in the two-stroke as well and it’s faster to begin with. They should be in separate classes. I think that’s something that could be worked out. My concerns are with running the two together – one, is the big horsepower advantage, and two, I can see that the average person who goes to buy a bike is paying similar money for something that has 10 more hp, probably less in maintenance, and I can see it killing the 250 four-stroke class because you can’t blame people. If you’re a privateer riding in that class it’s a no brainer, you will ride a 250 two-stroke. I totally disagree with it because it’s not a fair and level playing field."

http://www.motoonline.com.au/2014/07/31/point-two-stroke-vs-four-stroke…
O___o wrote:
40-41? Bullshit asshole. Mitch's motors did 51 this year. Fact. Landman? Not sure if he's a moron or a bold faced liar.
ML512 wrote:
One thing I've learned, dyno numbers are all over the place. The one I used at PC produces fairly high numbers on some stock bikes that...
One thing I've learned, dyno numbers are all over the place. The one I used at PC produces fairly high numbers on some stock bikes that I've run on different dyno as well. Realistically, the CRF250R isn't that strong out of the box, and I wouldn't be surprised if that's the numbers they saw on their dyno (by theirs, I mean Penrite's). Also, that Penrite team isn't going to have a modified engine that's near the level of what Pro Circuit, Factory Connection, TLD, etc. are building, so the gains are going to be smaller.

This is something to think about when complaining about the Australia and Canada rules, the teams up there aren't pulling the power out of a 250F that we see in the US or World GPs. So they aren't producing 250fs that are "trouncing" 250 2-strokes. A well jetted 2-stroke on race fuel with a good pipe combo up there, should be more than competitive against the 250Fs that are being run.
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2 stroke holeshotting every Moto, ktm or yami making a factory effort)

IMO the usa 250f are just amazing fast, without motor work a 250 smoker would be slower than a team 250f in America. And that's just drag race power, obviously they would smoke 2 strokes everywhere else where you can't put half the power of your smoker down compared to 250f where you would have much better traction in 90% more spots obviously.

No sand tracks, no clear "two stroke tracks"..

What do you think?

Micahdogg
Posts
1263
Joined
1/3/2011
Location
USA
11/12/2014 9:54am
Mike Landman is still off base with this "A stock 250 four-stroke out of the box, is anywhere from 35, 36 to 38hp and a stock 250 two-stroke is 8-10 more horses than that. It is possible to get a 250 four-stroke to about 40 or 41hp but you can increase the power in the two-stroke as well and it’s faster to begin with. "

For 2014 MXA got these results:
CRF250 = 37.25HP, 250SXF = 42.89HP!!!!, KX250F = 41.14HP, RMZ = 39.23HP, YZ250F = 40.61HP. The 250F averages out to 40HP now. Granted he is right, the two stroke makes 8-10HP more.

The Shop

O___o
Posts
730
Joined
9/25/2014
Location
CA
11/12/2014 10:10am Edited Date/Time 11/12/2014 10:11am
"Mike Landman – Penrite Honda Racing team manager: In the Lites class, definitely not. Not a 250 two-stroke anyway, maybe a 150 or something like that...
"Mike Landman – Penrite Honda Racing team manager:
In the Lites class, definitely not. Not a 250 two-stroke anyway, maybe a 150 or something like that. A stock 250 four-stroke out of the box, is anywhere from 35, 36 to 38hp and a stock 250 two-stroke is 8-10 more horses than that. It is possible to get a 250 four-stroke to about 40 or 41hp but you can increase the power in the two-stroke as well and it’s faster to begin with. They should be in separate classes. I think that’s something that could be worked out. My concerns are with running the two together – one, is the big horsepower advantage, and two, I can see that the average person who goes to buy a bike is paying similar money for something that has 10 more hp, probably less in maintenance, and I can see it killing the 250 four-stroke class because you can’t blame people. If you’re a privateer riding in that class it’s a no brainer, you will ride a 250 two-stroke. I totally disagree with it because it’s not a fair and level playing field."

http://www.motoonline.com.au/2014/07/31/point-two-stroke-vs-four-stroke…
O___o wrote:
40-41? Bullshit asshole. Mitch's motors did 51 this year. Fact. Landman? Not sure if he's a moron or a bold faced liar.
ML512 wrote:
One thing I've learned, dyno numbers are all over the place. The one I used at PC produces fairly high numbers on some stock bikes that...
One thing I've learned, dyno numbers are all over the place. The one I used at PC produces fairly high numbers on some stock bikes that I've run on different dyno as well. Realistically, the CRF250R isn't that strong out of the box, and I wouldn't be surprised if that's the numbers they saw on their dyno (by theirs, I mean Penrite's). Also, that Penrite team isn't going to have a modified engine that's near the level of what Pro Circuit, Factory Connection, TLD, etc. are building, so the gains are going to be smaller.

This is something to think about when complaining about the Australia and Canada rules, the teams up there aren't pulling the power out of a 250F that we see in the US or World GPs. So they aren't producing 250fs that are "trouncing" 250 2-strokes. A well jetted 2-stroke on race fuel with a good pipe combo up there, should be more than competitive against the 250Fs that are being run.
I'll buy slight deviation in dyno numbers, correction factors, but 40-41hp from a top tier modified 250F is simply exaggerating for the sake of embellishment.

If I were KTM, I would make a KTM250SX "Factory Edition", with revised port timing and compression ratio, race gas only, that produces around 56hp from the dealership, and just destroy and exploit this rule, and sell an orange bike to every privateer in Oz and Canada. It would fall in line great with the suspension support and whatnot that they offer for the proverbial "little guy".
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
11/12/2014 10:29am
O___o wrote:
I'll buy slight deviation in dyno numbers, correction factors, but 40-41hp from a top tier modified 250F is simply exaggerating for the sake of embellishment. If...
I'll buy slight deviation in dyno numbers, correction factors, but 40-41hp from a top tier modified 250F is simply exaggerating for the sake of embellishment.

If I were KTM, I would make a KTM250SX "Factory Edition", with revised port timing and compression ratio, race gas only, that produces around 56hp from the dealership, and just destroy and exploit this rule, and sell an orange bike to every privateer in Oz and Canada. It would fall in line great with the suspension support and whatnot that they offer for the proverbial "little guy".
56hp from a 250F?

Dream on...
O___o
Posts
730
Joined
9/25/2014
Location
CA
11/12/2014 10:33am
O___o wrote:
I'll buy slight deviation in dyno numbers, correction factors, but 40-41hp from a top tier modified 250F is simply exaggerating for the sake of embellishment. If...
I'll buy slight deviation in dyno numbers, correction factors, but 40-41hp from a top tier modified 250F is simply exaggerating for the sake of embellishment.

If I were KTM, I would make a KTM250SX "Factory Edition", with revised port timing and compression ratio, race gas only, that produces around 56hp from the dealership, and just destroy and exploit this rule, and sell an orange bike to every privateer in Oz and Canada. It would fall in line great with the suspension support and whatnot that they offer for the proverbial "little guy".
CamP wrote:
56hp from a 250F?

Dream on...
I said KTM250SX. Those are two-strokes. They fire at TDC every revolution and use an exhaust pipe that looks a bit like a musical instrument. they get their lubrication from oil dissolved in the fuel.

They are very innovative. You should really go check one out.

I can't even comprehend how you couldn't comprehend my post.
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
11/12/2014 10:54am Edited Date/Time 11/12/2014 10:55am
O___o wrote:
I said KTM250SX. Those are two-strokes. They fire at TDC every revolution and use an exhaust pipe that looks a bit like a musical instrument. they...
I said KTM250SX. Those are two-strokes. They fire at TDC every revolution and use an exhaust pipe that looks a bit like a musical instrument. they get their lubrication from oil dissolved in the fuel.

They are very innovative. You should really go check one out.

I can't even comprehend how you couldn't comprehend my post.
56hp from a production 250SX?

Dream on...
WRH
Posts
191
Joined
5/5/2014
Location
Saraland, AL, USA
11/12/2014 11:00am
And that is how the 2 stroke engine evolves... If there is a market then someone will seize the opportuninty to master it and be "THE" manufacture of the bike to own, if you want to go to the front. Eventually the 4 strokes go away or they make different classes for them to race in.
And there are so many ways to change how that 2 stroke runs "within" the stock class rules.
.kyle
Posts
469
Joined
6/5/2011
Location
GB
11/12/2014 11:02am
O___o wrote:
I said KTM250SX. Those are two-strokes. They fire at TDC every revolution and use an exhaust pipe that looks a bit like a musical instrument. they...
I said KTM250SX. Those are two-strokes. They fire at TDC every revolution and use an exhaust pipe that looks a bit like a musical instrument. they get their lubrication from oil dissolved in the fuel.

They are very innovative. You should really go check one out.

I can't even comprehend how you couldn't comprehend my post.
CamP wrote:
56hp from a production 250SX?

Dream on...
The stock 2003 KTM 250sx (apparently) made 51bhp. So 11 years of R&D later, I'm sure it wouldn't be hard for them to get to 56bhp.
O___o
Posts
730
Joined
9/25/2014
Location
CA
11/12/2014 11:04am
O___o wrote:
I said KTM250SX. Those are two-strokes. They fire at TDC every revolution and use an exhaust pipe that looks a bit like a musical instrument. they...
I said KTM250SX. Those are two-strokes. They fire at TDC every revolution and use an exhaust pipe that looks a bit like a musical instrument. they get their lubrication from oil dissolved in the fuel.

They are very innovative. You should really go check one out.

I can't even comprehend how you couldn't comprehend my post.
CamP wrote:
56hp from a production 250SX?

Dream on...
you don't think KTM could produce another 5hp from their 250SX, coat the frame orange, put redbull graphics on it and call it a Factory Edition, thus taking advantage of the Oz and Aus rulebook?

you're definitely an idiot. but, keep calm and mill .030 off the base of everything.



CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
11/12/2014 11:14am
Nice pic! That's former US National #38 behind me!
sybro
Posts
165
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Montreal, CA
11/12/2014 12:22pm
How about using just SXS parts (head, piston ....) that would be consider OEM no ?
Micahdogg
Posts
1263
Joined
1/3/2011
Location
USA
11/12/2014 12:39pm
.kyle wrote:
The stock 2003 KTM 250sx (apparently) made 51bhp. So 11 years of R&D later, I'm sure it wouldn't be hard for them to get to 56bhp.
It made more like 49HP, about what they make now (after all that R&D). But like I said earlier, if DV12's dad can make a stock (2010?) YZ250 go from 45HP to 53HP, surely KTM could improve on that number. .
slipdog
Posts
10054
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Nor Cal, CA, USA
11/12/2014 12:57pm
Most of you guys don't know shit... That is all.
mxb2
Posts
22437
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD, USA
11/12/2014 1:57pm
CamP wrote:
Nice pic! That's former US National #38 behind me!
Whats his name? #38, did you beat him.in a moto?
SwapperMX
Posts
2153
Joined
6/16/2010
Location
AU
11/12/2014 3:10pm
slipdog wrote:
Most of you guys don't know shit... That is all.
explain .....
NV825
Posts
2175
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Carson City, NV, USA
11/12/2014 3:19pm
I think these rules are more than fair. It's not saying a rider has to go out on stock suspension. I'd like to see the US governing bodies adopt the following:

- 125 2-stroke class for amateurs
- 250 2-stroke and 4-stroke class with these rules
- Open class
SwapperMX
Posts
2153
Joined
6/16/2010
Location
AU
11/12/2014 3:33pm
Gringoe wrote:
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2...
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2 stroke holeshotting every Moto, ktm or yami making a factory effort)

IMO the usa 250f are just amazing fast, without motor work a 250 smoker would be slower than a team 250f in America. And that's just drag race power, obviously they would smoke 2 strokes everywhere else where you can't put half the power of your smoker down compared to 250f where you would have much better traction in 90% more spots obviously.

No sand tracks, no clear "two stroke tracks"..

What do you think?

I agree, and even if they made 250 two strokes legal in the AMA pro MX nationals, I doubt anyone would ride one. Maybe a couple of privateers, but they would get waxed anyway. It's obvious that they aren't going to change the rules in the USA at a pro national level, but I don't think it would matter if they did.
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/12/2014 3:41pm
All you jacklegs better watch it or Matthes will never click on any more of your threads!!

I do find some humor in this sad ass thread though. Can't mod a 2 stroke but the factory teams can have $50,000.00 single race 4 stroke engines. Damn OEM's are backed into a corner with their "4 jokes are better". Whiny little bitches they are. Whiny little bitches.....
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/12/2014 3:45pm
And how did a 2 stroke thread get three pages without me? I thought I was the only one interested? Laughing
Crush
Posts
21115
Joined
4/26/2009
Location
Sydney, AU
11/12/2014 4:27pm
Gringoe wrote:
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2...
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2 stroke holeshotting every Moto, ktm or yami making a factory effort)

IMO the usa 250f are just amazing fast, without motor work a 250 smoker would be slower than a team 250f in America. And that's just drag race power, obviously they would smoke 2 strokes everywhere else where you can't put half the power of your smoker down compared to 250f where you would have much better traction in 90% more spots obviously.

No sand tracks, no clear "two stroke tracks"..

What do you think?

SwapperMX wrote:
I agree, and even if they made 250 two strokes legal in the AMA pro MX nationals, I doubt anyone would ride one. Maybe a couple...
I agree, and even if they made 250 two strokes legal in the AMA pro MX nationals, I doubt anyone would ride one. Maybe a couple of privateers, but they would get waxed anyway. It's obvious that they aren't going to change the rules in the USA at a pro national level, but I don't think it would matter if they did.
The idea that the oems will pack up their bags and go home is absolutely patently ridiculous.

They're in the market of selling dirt bikes. Honda or Kawi isn't gonna say fuck it, we don't race anymore, and put at risk their however many million dollar dirt bike business because KTM and Yamaha or anyone that chooses is allowed to race a two stroke.

They didn't do it when Yamaha brought in 4 strokes. They just built the right machine for the rules and the market and kept going.
mxb2
Posts
22437
Joined
6/15/2010
Location
Bowie, MD, USA
11/12/2014 4:44pm
newmann wrote:
And how did a 2 stroke thread get three pages without me? I thought I was the only one interested? Laughing
complaining on vital and buying a new 2 stroke, 2 different things.
11/12/2014 4:52pm Edited Date/Time 11/12/2014 4:58pm
Kawasaki will have 2 riders next year with 0 riders on a 250 under the Factory tent because PC runs that program.
Yamaha has no more factory team because JGR runs it.
Suzuki will have one rider, 2 if Stewart doesn't get banned with 0 riders being on a 250 under the factory tent.
Honda will have 3 riders with 0 riders being on a 250 under the factory tent.

I don't see PC, FC, Husky or KTM going anywhere if the rules change.

That's 7 spots we would lose "IF" they did decide to leave.

It is my tin foil hat conspiracy/opinion that Feld/MXSports isn't worried about dropping 7 spots that would probably be picked up by private teams, but is more worried about not receiving sponsorship money for their magazine/outdoor series and SX series. This is just my opinion, but it's the only reason that makes sense to me to not change the rules. 7 spots wouldn't ruin the sport.
Gringoe
Posts
1586
Joined
4/12/2014
Location
MP
11/12/2014 7:39pm Edited Date/Time 11/12/2014 7:39pm
Gringoe wrote:
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2...
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2 stroke holeshotting every Moto, ktm or yami making a factory effort)

IMO the usa 250f are just amazing fast, without motor work a 250 smoker would be slower than a team 250f in America. And that's just drag race power, obviously they would smoke 2 strokes everywhere else where you can't put half the power of your smoker down compared to 250f where you would have much better traction in 90% more spots obviously.

No sand tracks, no clear "two stroke tracks"..

What do you think?

SwapperMX wrote:
I agree, and even if they made 250 two strokes legal in the AMA pro MX nationals, I doubt anyone would ride one. Maybe a couple...
I agree, and even if they made 250 two strokes legal in the AMA pro MX nationals, I doubt anyone would ride one. Maybe a couple of privateers, but they would get waxed anyway. It's obvious that they aren't going to change the rules in the USA at a pro national level, but I don't think it would matter if they did.
You'd be suprised. I think there'd be at least 5-10 privateers give or take on them a round and maybe one/two of them might not get waxed to bad. Hell it might even be nice to listen to and make it a tad more interesting past about 16th (big drop off)
jeffro503
Posts
27635
Joined
7/22/2007
Location
St Helens, OR, USA
11/12/2014 7:45pm
Well....here goes........

IF they made the 250 2 stroke legal in the 250 class.....what would prevent KTM from fielding a lites team....on 250 2 stroke AND 250F 4 strokes? They sell both.....and would help sell both bikes.

The ONLY people that would bitch about it....the big 4! And you damn well know it!
11/12/2014 8:44pm
Gringoe wrote:
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2...
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2 stroke holeshotting every Moto, ktm or yami making a factory effort)

IMO the usa 250f are just amazing fast, without motor work a 250 smoker would be slower than a team 250f in America. And that's just drag race power, obviously they would smoke 2 strokes everywhere else where you can't put half the power of your smoker down compared to 250f where you would have much better traction in 90% more spots obviously.

No sand tracks, no clear "two stroke tracks"..

What do you think?

SwapperMX wrote:
I agree, and even if they made 250 two strokes legal in the AMA pro MX nationals, I doubt anyone would ride one. Maybe a couple...
I agree, and even if they made 250 two strokes legal in the AMA pro MX nationals, I doubt anyone would ride one. Maybe a couple of privateers, but they would get waxed anyway. It's obvious that they aren't going to change the rules in the USA at a pro national level, but I don't think it would matter if they did.
Crush wrote:
The idea that the oems will pack up their bags and go home is absolutely patently ridiculous. They're in the market of selling dirt bikes. Honda...
The idea that the oems will pack up their bags and go home is absolutely patently ridiculous.

They're in the market of selling dirt bikes. Honda or Kawi isn't gonna say fuck it, we don't race anymore, and put at risk their however many million dollar dirt bike business because KTM and Yamaha or anyone that chooses is allowed to race a two stroke.

They didn't do it when Yamaha brought in 4 strokes. They just built the right machine for the rules and the market and kept going.
Nail on the head my friend.
Johnny Depp
Posts
6435
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
11/12/2014 10:09pm Edited Date/Time 11/12/2014 10:12pm
Why is everyone so focused on the size of the engine? You're thinking inside the box. What is the plan when electric bikes are competitive?

How about:

The fastest guys riding anything they want.

The up and comers ride smaller wheeled bikes with restricted power (intakes like NASCAR)

That's it. Everyone else is amateur.

Wait, never mind, this is Canada we are talking about, they aren't expected to be the premiere series in the world.
11/13/2014 1:40am
NV825 wrote:
I think these rules are more than fair. It's not saying a rider has to go out on stock suspension. I'd like to see the US...
I think these rules are more than fair. It's not saying a rider has to go out on stock suspension. I'd like to see the US governing bodies adopt the following:

- 125 2-stroke class for amateurs
- 250 2-stroke and 4-stroke class with these rules
- Open class
they do, its raced for a national championship at loretta lynns every year, they even have different skill level classes,

Aaryn234
Posts
3312
Joined
8/19/2007
Location
South Australia, SA, AU
Fantasy
11/13/2014 2:21am
Gringoe wrote:
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2...
So with that being said, do you or do you not think these rules could be implemented in usa without big negatives? (Oems going home, 2 stroke holeshotting every Moto, ktm or yami making a factory effort)

IMO the usa 250f are just amazing fast, without motor work a 250 smoker would be slower than a team 250f in America. And that's just drag race power, obviously they would smoke 2 strokes everywhere else where you can't put half the power of your smoker down compared to 250f where you would have much better traction in 90% more spots obviously.

No sand tracks, no clear "two stroke tracks"..

What do you think?

SwapperMX wrote:
I agree, and even if they made 250 two strokes legal in the AMA pro MX nationals, I doubt anyone would ride one. Maybe a couple...
I agree, and even if they made 250 two strokes legal in the AMA pro MX nationals, I doubt anyone would ride one. Maybe a couple of privateers, but they would get waxed anyway. It's obvious that they aren't going to change the rules in the USA at a pro national level, but I don't think it would matter if they did.
Crush wrote:
The idea that the oems will pack up their bags and go home is absolutely patently ridiculous. They're in the market of selling dirt bikes. Honda...
The idea that the oems will pack up their bags and go home is absolutely patently ridiculous.

They're in the market of selling dirt bikes. Honda or Kawi isn't gonna say fuck it, we don't race anymore, and put at risk their however many million dollar dirt bike business because KTM and Yamaha or anyone that chooses is allowed to race a two stroke.

They didn't do it when Yamaha brought in 4 strokes. They just built the right machine for the rules and the market and kept going.
Crush don't be to sure,

There was no Suzuki or Kawasaki support in the MX2 class this year or the SX2 class, there was one 250F backing from Honda, Wilson MX had Honda support in term of bikes, though I am not 100% sure of at what level, eg how much they were paying for the bike, but there was not go fast parts handed down. They do have a very good engine builder / mechanic though.

KTM had no 250F supported riders and nor did Husqvarna, though KTM had Three factory supported 250 two stroke riders (Makeham, Harrison, Harwood - NZ) and Husqvarna a few riders under Ando during the year on two strokes.

Yamaha has two Factory supported riders on 250F's and Willis was getting a little support on the two stroke.

My point being that don't be so sure that manufactures won't just walk away when push comes to shove.

And if you think it does not make a difference, just think of the number of MX2 supported rides in Australia this year, not many if any.

And also don't expect to see any two stroke factory supported rides from any manufacture in Aus in 2015, even the big makers of two strokes. Notice Arbon already back on the 250F for SX final round, 99% sure Ward is back getting used to a orange 250F.

Kiwi Lamont now over at Yamaha on a 250F.

I think the only riders you will see on 250 two strokes in Aus next year will be full privateers.

Post a reply to: New Canadian 250 2 stroke rules.

The Latest