PingrPingree on Feld - "teams are being bled from every angle"

GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
1/30/2013 11:56am
Apparently not. I've seen enough of your posts in Non-Moto to know that's the case...
Pdub
Posts
1477
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
Wheaton, MD US
1/30/2013 12:06pm Edited Date/Time 1/30/2013 12:06pm
DA498 wrote:
As a core fan, I don't want a show, I want a race event. I feel SX was invented to introduce the general public to our...
As a core fan, I don't want a show, I want a race event. I feel SX was invented to introduce the general public to our outdoor hero's and how cool our sport is. Over time it has turned into its own entity (show) . Now what? Do we embrace it as a show and move in that direction? Its hard for me.
Now I see trends in the outdoors leading to a show mentality with many of the same issues we are talking about here. I think that MX / SX is too small in the grand scheme of things to ever get the interest we all hope for.
Teams may need to recognize the realities and adjust to them.
With all due respect, professional motocross racing was "invented" first to sell racebikes to wannabe pros, second to sell entry tickets to fans. Supercross was "invented" to sell tickets by the tens of thousands for a single race (the location of the first "Superbowl of Motocross" was in the 90,000+ seat Los Angeles Coliseum). It was a show then and it is a show now, just put on by people who are very much experts at putting on big shows.
Choppy
Posts
1931
Joined
12/16/2012
Location
US
1/30/2013 12:07pm
What was stated was true. I think you simply got mixed up. Flarider's post a couple up sum it up.
1/30/2013 12:13pm
Clearly Pingree knows something? It's a strong statement to share publicly!

The Shop

151
Posts
536
Joined
9/15/2009
Location
Olive Branch, MS US
1/30/2013 1:03pm
I agree with your statement "in its current form".

That was sort of my entire point. Who can say how rodeo would be percieved these days had the riders not taken over from promoters in 1936.

The deal is PBR and PRCA are run for the sport and riders by the sport and riders.

Any organization putting on a show is going to try to make money. The question is where do we want that profit reinvested. Should a monster truck and ice skating company choose how and where to reinvest profits, or would it be better spent by riders and people whose main interest is dirtbike racing?

No one can really fault Feld. Their business is not to make SX the best sport it can be. They do what they do and maybe they are good at it.

But, a series run by riders or former riders and structured for the long term best interest of the sport seems like an obvious best choice.

That said, there are some significant differences between bull riding and MX. First and most obvious they don't have to buy the bull.

Here is some more intersting info

With his domination of the Professional Bull Riders (PBR) 2005 PBR Built Ford Tough Series (BFTS) presented by Wrangler season and capture of the 2005 PBR World Championship title, Justin McBride. became the second bull rider in PBR history to surpass the $2.5 million career earnings mark. The $1,519,631 he won during the 2005 BFTS season is a PBR record for season earnings. In fact, the 2005 BFTS season produced the highest money earners in the history of the PBR; every top 20 bull rider won virtually $100,000.
Source: http://www.pbrnow.com/release/?id=1924



"Starting at semi-pro, the top earner made $26,000
At the second from top-level: the top earner earned $238,000
At the premiere level: the Professional Bull Riders (PBR), the top annual earnings last year was over $460,000...and then the top-earner gets a $1,000,000 bonus (1.4 million total)."
tal)."

http://www.pbr.com/en/news/press-releases/2010/1/pbr-to-surpass-$100-mi…
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
1/30/2013 1:25pm
151 wrote:
I agree with your statement "in its current form". That was sort of my entire point. Who can say how rodeo would be percieved these days...
I agree with your statement "in its current form".

That was sort of my entire point. Who can say how rodeo would be percieved these days had the riders not taken over from promoters in 1936.

The deal is PBR and PRCA are run for the sport and riders by the sport and riders.

Any organization putting on a show is going to try to make money. The question is where do we want that profit reinvested. Should a monster truck and ice skating company choose how and where to reinvest profits, or would it be better spent by riders and people whose main interest is dirtbike racing?

No one can really fault Feld. Their business is not to make SX the best sport it can be. They do what they do and maybe they are good at it.

But, a series run by riders or former riders and structured for the long term best interest of the sport seems like an obvious best choice.

That said, there are some significant differences between bull riding and MX. First and most obvious they don't have to buy the bull.

Here is some more intersting info

With his domination of the Professional Bull Riders (PBR) 2005 PBR Built Ford Tough Series (BFTS) presented by Wrangler season and capture of the 2005 PBR World Championship title, Justin McBride. became the second bull rider in PBR history to surpass the $2.5 million career earnings mark. The $1,519,631 he won during the 2005 BFTS season is a PBR record for season earnings. In fact, the 2005 BFTS season produced the highest money earners in the history of the PBR; every top 20 bull rider won virtually $100,000.
Source: http://www.pbrnow.com/release/?id=1924



"Starting at semi-pro, the top earner made $26,000
At the second from top-level: the top earner earned $238,000
At the premiere level: the Professional Bull Riders (PBR), the top annual earnings last year was over $460,000...and then the top-earner gets a $1,000,000 bonus (1.4 million total)."
tal)."

http://www.pbr.com/en/news/press-releases/2010/1/pbr-to-surpass-$100-mi…
Just as an FYI, the last link you posted was from 2010, and featured Randy Bernard, who ran the PBR at the time. He became the CEO of Indycar, and was bumped out of that spot recently after dissent from the teams and the Indy board of directors. The correlation between how PBR does things and translating to motorsports might not be as strong as you'd hope. Wink
151
Posts
536
Joined
9/15/2009
Location
Olive Branch, MS US
1/30/2013 1:53pm
GuyB wrote:
Just as an FYI, the last link you posted was from 2010, and featured Randy Bernard, who ran the PBR at the time. He became the...
Just as an FYI, the last link you posted was from 2010, and featured Randy Bernard, who ran the PBR at the time. He became the CEO of Indycar, and was bumped out of that spot recently after dissent from the teams and the Indy board of directors. The correlation between how PBR does things and translating to motorsports might not be as strong as you'd hope. Wink
I'm sure you are right. And I'm a total "outsider". However I think their is plenty of potential for profit with MX and SX and I believe the concept of reinvesting those profits in the sport directly, not into a seperate company has a lot of merit.

good read.

http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/article/pruett-the-firing-of-indycar-ceo…
1/30/2013 2:07pm
motokiwi wrote:
SX has a name and face to blame it on, Dave Prater, Director of supercross for Feld motor sports. According to jt$ hes one of the...
SX has a name and face to blame it on, Dave Prater, Director of supercross for Feld motor sports.
According to jt$ hes one of the good guys... however he runs the show...
The show that does not pay the talent adequately, does not give teams exposure, over emphasizes their main sponsor so much that it becomes a giant monster energy advertisement first and foremost with some racing in between.

GuyB wrote:
Yeah, I saw you call out Dave the other day. Have you met Dave? Talked to him? Know what he's all about? Yeah, I didn't think...
Yeah, I saw you call out Dave the other day. Have you met Dave? Talked to him? Know what he's all about? Yeah, I didn't think so.
BobbyM wrote:
guy is moto and a really good dude no matter what the corp. is about.
AGREED
BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
1/30/2013 2:20pm
Lotta peeps without a clue trying to solve a murder mystery. Presumptuous assumptions and jumping to conclusions is off the charts at the place.
DrSweden
Posts
6761
Joined
8/30/2008
Location
Stockholm SE
1/30/2013 2:30pm Edited Date/Time 1/30/2013 2:55pm
Some serious typing going on here, this guy is portrayed both as Satan and Jesus in the same tread! Impressive! Either way, maybe we could all agre has a nice watch at least! Cool
ocscottie
Posts
69092
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Redding, CA US
1/30/2013 2:40pm
BobbyM wrote:
Lotta peeps without a clue trying to solve a murder mystery. Presumptuous assumptions and jumping to conclusions is off the charts at the place.
Bobby, chk yer yahoo email, sent you a story about some really wild amputee stuff!! Made me think of you.
willie838
Posts
852
Joined
8/9/2011
Location
New Windsor, NY US
1/30/2013 4:04pm
i'm sure that dave and feld are secretly sabotaging the sport.

they're clearly hoping to bankrupt all the teams and major players while hiding sx away in a back corner, since they stand to gain NOTHING if they can increase the value of the entire industry.

probably lighting cigars with hundreds those fat cats.

god this fucking place.
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13058
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA US
1/30/2013 4:19pm Edited Date/Time 1/30/2013 4:20pm
DrSweden wrote:
Some serious typing going on here, this guy is portrayed both as Satan and Jesus in the same tread! Impressive! Either way, maybe we could all...
Some serious typing going on here, this guy is portrayed both as Satan and Jesus in the same tread! Impressive! Either way, maybe we could all agre has a nice watch at least! Cool
The boards always deal in Angels and Demons, never that good people are doing their best, and that there are a lot of competing interests that don't always knit together easily or tightly.

I think that one thing for sure about this pretty small sport is that the tipping point when it's not worth it has a pretty steep drop off without a lot of alternatives. It's true for riders, and for teams, and also for Feld and MXSports and Youthstream. The promoters need to maintain viable businesses, which requires a lot of up front expense, but they cannot do that in the long run apart from creating a platform for the teams and riders to sustain their programs, if not have those programs thrive, in good and bad economic times. If a promoter cannot accomplish both, then the thing will collapse; the promoter will not have riders, or the riders won't have a promoter staging events that make the riders relevant.
ab5772
Posts
699
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SLC, UT US
1/30/2013 4:31pm
I don't keep up with bull riding, but how does that compare to supercross? How much does it cost to run a professional bull riding team? What's the overhead besides paying some crazy cowboy to hop on the back of a bull? Those dudes are nuts.
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
1/30/2013 4:31pm
willie838 wrote:
i'm sure that dave and feld are secretly sabotaging the sport. they're clearly hoping to bankrupt all the teams and major players while hiding sx away...
i'm sure that dave and feld are secretly sabotaging the sport.

they're clearly hoping to bankrupt all the teams and major players while hiding sx away in a back corner, since they stand to gain NOTHING if they can increase the value of the entire industry.

probably lighting cigars with hundreds those fat cats.

god this fucking place.
The thing that weirds me out these days is that people used to be able to come up with a common sense argument that would make people go, "Huh...I didn't think of it that way. Maybe there is another side to this." But now everyone seems to think there's always an ulterior motive, or some deep dark secret, and prefer digging in their heels for a fight. They'll also eager to believe kooky conspiracy theories, etc. It doesn't matter what the topic is. Maybe that's a downside to all the social sharing that goes on now.
BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
1/30/2013 4:38pm
BobbyM wrote:
Lotta peeps without a clue trying to solve a murder mystery. Presumptuous assumptions and jumping to conclusions is off the charts at the place.
ocscottie wrote:
Bobby, chk yer yahoo email, sent you a story about some really wild amputee stuff!! Made me think of you.
will do scottie my boy
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13058
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA US
1/30/2013 4:39pm
GuyB wrote:
The thing that weirds me out these days is that people used to be able to come up with a common sense argument that would make...
The thing that weirds me out these days is that people used to be able to come up with a common sense argument that would make people go, "Huh...I didn't think of it that way. Maybe there is another side to this." But now everyone seems to think there's always an ulterior motive, or some deep dark secret, and prefer digging in their heels for a fight. They'll also eager to believe kooky conspiracy theories, etc. It doesn't matter what the topic is. Maybe that's a downside to all the social sharing that goes on now.
That and people confuse cynicism with critical thinking and intelligence. All the social media sharing that goes on now bears out that the former certainly is easier to pull off than the latter.
Holigan
Posts
1448
Joined
6/18/2008
Location
Dallas, TX US
1/30/2013 5:02pm
GuyB wrote:
The thing that weirds me out these days is that people used to be able to come up with a common sense argument that would make...
The thing that weirds me out these days is that people used to be able to come up with a common sense argument that would make people go, "Huh...I didn't think of it that way. Maybe there is another side to this." But now everyone seems to think there's always an ulterior motive, or some deep dark secret, and prefer digging in their heels for a fight. They'll also eager to believe kooky conspiracy theories, etc. It doesn't matter what the topic is. Maybe that's a downside to all the social sharing that goes on now.
I noticed that after TFS started posting here Smile
CamP
Posts
6826
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Colleyville, TX US
1/30/2013 5:57pm
That and people confuse cynicism with critical thinking and intelligence. All the social media sharing that goes on now bears out that the former certainly is...
That and people confuse cynicism with critical thinking and intelligence. All the social media sharing that goes on now bears out that the former certainly is easier to pull off than the latter.
You've got that right.
carson510
Posts
90
Joined
1/15/2011
Location
Orofino, ID US
1/30/2013 6:09pm
GuyB wrote:
Yeah, I saw you call out Dave the other day. Have you met Dave? Talked to him? Know what he's all about? Yeah, I didn't think...
Yeah, I saw you call out Dave the other day. Have you met Dave? Talked to him? Know what he's all about? Yeah, I didn't think so.
BobbyM wrote:
guy is moto and a really good dude no matter what the corp. is about.
AGREED
AND He's wearing a thor shirt and I see a monster energy can in the background...must be getting paid by Parts Unlimited and Monster to fix wins for the Kawi guys.... Tongue
bobby397
Posts
3597
Joined
3/21/2009
Location
NC US
1/30/2013 6:46pm
As long as I get live sx coverage I could care a less who makes what at field
1/30/2013 8:28pm
A lot of people forget that MX and SX are relatively new when you compare it to other big time pro sports. Especially supercross. Look at basketball for example. Leagues and teams have come and gone over the years. My point is though, that baseball, basketball, football, hockey and even auto racing have like what? 50 or 60 years at least of growth and history ahead of motocross. That's a long time.

What will SX be in 50 years? Could be the biggest sport on the planet.
1/30/2013 8:50pm
A lot of people forget that MX and SX are relatively new when you compare it to other big time pro sports. Especially supercross. Look at...
A lot of people forget that MX and SX are relatively new when you compare it to other big time pro sports. Especially supercross. Look at basketball for example. Leagues and teams have come and gone over the years. My point is though, that baseball, basketball, football, hockey and even auto racing have like what? 50 or 60 years at least of growth and history ahead of motocross. That's a long time.

What will SX be in 50 years? Could be the biggest sport on the planet.
SX and MX has the luxury of learning from those sports that have come before it. Be silly not to try and take what works in those sports and implement it into SX.
TeamGreen
Posts
36699
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
1/30/2013 9:12pm
I'm sorry?

What did you say?

I haven't been able to stop laughing since I read that James is paying Don to ride the Zook.

Bwahahahahahahaha...

"Vitards"...Indeed.
Hut
Posts
10281
Joined
4/27/2010
Location
WA US
1/30/2013 9:48pm
DrSweden wrote:
Some serious typing going on here, this guy is portrayed both as Satan and Jesus in the same tread! Impressive! Either way, maybe we could all...
Some serious typing going on here, this guy is portrayed both as Satan and Jesus in the same tread! Impressive! Either way, maybe we could all agre has a nice watch at least! Cool
I don't know anything about promoting a professional racing series but that is one fine submariner. Cool
I have the poor boy version from Wenger.
1/31/2013 12:56am
willie838 wrote:
i'm sure that dave and feld are secretly sabotaging the sport. they're clearly hoping to bankrupt all the teams and major players while hiding sx away...
i'm sure that dave and feld are secretly sabotaging the sport.

they're clearly hoping to bankrupt all the teams and major players while hiding sx away in a back corner, since they stand to gain NOTHING if they can increase the value of the entire industry.

probably lighting cigars with hundreds those fat cats.

god this fucking place.
GuyB wrote:
The thing that weirds me out these days is that people used to be able to come up with a common sense argument that would make...
The thing that weirds me out these days is that people used to be able to come up with a common sense argument that would make people go, "Huh...I didn't think of it that way. Maybe there is another side to this." But now everyone seems to think there's always an ulterior motive, or some deep dark secret, and prefer digging in their heels for a fight. They'll also eager to believe kooky conspiracy theories, etc. It doesn't matter what the topic is. Maybe that's a downside to all the social sharing that goes on now.
Tell me about it................Problem is, forms of media like this forum and others let everyone have their soap-box, now everything thinks they are an insider........And people I have never met seem to know me better than my best friends and family. Mate half the real insiders don't have a clue, but like to let people think they do.
Lone Wolf
Posts
494
Joined
9/25/2012
Location
NZ
1/31/2013 3:05am
Does anyone actually know how much money Feld makes from Supercross, or is it just assumed to be a lot? I would guess the operating costs are very high, and you have to consider the financial risk they take in putting on the series. You also have to accept that the promoters want to take a profit - they are running a business after all.

I don't really have enough insight into the operation to comment on how good of a job Feld is doing. I'm sure they don't get everything right, but things could always be worse.

I didn't read the whole thread, so forgive me if I am off topic or if the above has already been covered.
DrSweden
Posts
6761
Joined
8/30/2008
Location
Stockholm SE
1/31/2013 3:46am
Hut wrote:
I don't know anything about promoting a professional racing series but that is one fine submariner. Cool
I have the poor boy version from Wenger.
Ha! I'm sure it shows the time as good, maybe even better? I feel pricey watches only purpose is to show off, sine I know some Rolexes needs high amount of service costs just to hold it's time. Whistling
jtiger12
Posts
1723
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
Forest H Ill, MD US
1/31/2013 4:13am Edited Date/Time 1/31/2013 4:23am
AHRMA361 wrote:
I am amazed at the lack of business knowledge on ROI by those that go straight to the $ someone/ or company has and injecting their...
I am amazed at the lack of business knowledge on ROI by those that go straight to the $ someone/ or company has and injecting their thoughts on where/how much of it should be spent......

Top of the food chain in my work world is Warren Buffet and he can (and does) buy and sell businesses on a very large or small scale......

he would not put one dime into supercross..........

just be glad somebody is willing to market supercross........
warren buffett puts a lot of money into sx, indirectly. Berkshire owns geico. Geico has a race team and runs tons of ads. I would think in his posititon, and knowing how much he reads, he is well aware of where geicos motorsports money is going.
DrSweden
Posts
6761
Joined
8/30/2008
Location
Stockholm SE
1/31/2013 4:16am
The boards always deal in Angels and Demons, never that good people are doing their best, and that there are a lot of competing interests that...
The boards always deal in Angels and Demons, never that good people are doing their best, and that there are a lot of competing interests that don't always knit together easily or tightly.

I think that one thing for sure about this pretty small sport is that the tipping point when it's not worth it has a pretty steep drop off without a lot of alternatives. It's true for riders, and for teams, and also for Feld and MXSports and Youthstream. The promoters need to maintain viable businesses, which requires a lot of up front expense, but they cannot do that in the long run apart from creating a platform for the teams and riders to sustain their programs, if not have those programs thrive, in good and bad economic times. If a promoter cannot accomplish both, then the thing will collapse; the promoter will not have riders, or the riders won't have a promoter staging events that make the riders relevant.
True dat.

Post a reply to: PingrPingree on Feld - "teams are being bled from every angle"

The Latest