nem ktm 350

rileymx
Posts
1107
Joined
10/24/2007
Location
Azores islands PT
Edited Date/Time 1/27/2012 9:00am
http://www.realmx.com/motocross-news/news-20080827093957-20091016094100…

here some photos of the new ktm 350 4 strokes........still a prototype but the base for next year bike for gpmx1 and ama450......
|
Motodude
Posts
5170
Joined
2/2/2008
Location
Sydney AU
10/21/2009 4:14am
Whoever is designing KTM's factory bikes must have been around when Suzuki dominated in the late 70's early 80's, with their double downtube cradle frame.

Motodude
Posts
5170
Joined
2/2/2008
Location
Sydney AU
10/21/2009 4:16am
probably start seeing those funky front number plates soon too..

R-acer
Posts
4047
Joined
3/20/2008
Location
Toronto CA
10/21/2009 4:35am
Is that still a STEEL frame? looks like it
Loose
Posts
901
Joined
9/12/2007
Location
Mackay AU
10/21/2009 4:42am
R-acer wrote:
Is that still a STEEL frame? looks like it
Steel seems to work fine for Ducati.

What's your point?

The Shop

JB 19
Posts
4330
Joined
3/8/2009
Location
Marion, OH US
10/21/2009 4:45am
KTM's have always been steel as far as I know.
neysbo
Posts
2005
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edelstein, IL US
10/21/2009 6:09am
that thing looks out dated already
Cygnus
Posts
14846
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Hanover, CO US
10/21/2009 6:16am
I'd rather have the Suzuki.
neysbo
Posts
2005
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edelstein, IL US
10/21/2009 6:19am
that thing looks out dated already
ProMed
Posts
2947
Joined
9/11/2006
Location
São Paulo BR
10/21/2009 6:23am
neysbo wrote:
that thing looks out dated already
Why did you feel the need to say it twice?
neysbo
Posts
2005
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edelstein, IL US
10/21/2009 6:40am
Sorry , my computer or internet connection is messed up and it is real slow and I must have hit submit twice
Karma
Posts
871
Joined
9/14/2009
Location
CA
10/21/2009 7:53am
yup those cool aluminum frames look way tricker, therefor they must better...
Motodude
Posts
5170
Joined
2/2/2008
Location
Sydney AU
10/21/2009 7:55am
neysbo wrote:
Sorry , my computer or internet connection is messed up and it is real slow and I must have hit submit twice
Still using dial up on your 486 huh. Talk about outdated.
ML512
Posts
16855
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
10/21/2009 8:04am
Can someone remind me what they name of the material ktm uses for the frames is i know its not just plain steel, its called ____ ? Something alloy? I can't remember Dizzy
sdfog1
Posts
966
Joined
5/24/2009
Location
Flower Mound, TX US
10/21/2009 8:07am
ML512 wrote:
Can someone remind me what they name of the material ktm uses for the frames is i know its not just plain steel, its called ____...
Can someone remind me what they name of the material ktm uses for the frames is i know its not just plain steel, its called ____ ? Something alloy? I can't remember Dizzy
Chromoly?
mx836
Posts
5578
Joined
4/2/2008
Location
; BF
10/21/2009 9:03am
R-acer wrote:
Is that still a STEEL frame? looks like it
You must like those massively over sized and over priced aluminum units that make it next to impossible to work on without ripping half the bike apart.
BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
WA US
10/21/2009 9:57am
I like the way they brought the double down tube up higher, looks like the exhaust port is straight , not off to the side.
10/21/2009 10:05am
R-acer wrote:
Is that still a STEEL frame? looks like it
there is no weight or strength advantage in using aluminum according to KTM so why spend the extra money? save it and keep developing the 2 stroke.... Evil
ktmdan
Posts
1226
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Houston, TX US
10/21/2009 10:09am
R-acer wrote:
Is that still a STEEL frame? looks like it
Wow, really?

You fell right into the marketing trap of the big four. You probably also think that marijuana is a killer drug and that the world is done in 2012.
The steel frames don't weigh much different than aluminum and they handle much better. I went from KTM to kawi and the kawi feels SO stiff in the corners. This is the same reason road racing bicycles are not aluminum, because they are too stiff and have no flex.
BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
WA US
10/21/2009 10:17am
I never really understood why they all went Aluminum frames. Since day one they never saved any weight doing so.
neysbo
Posts
2005
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Edelstein, IL US
10/21/2009 10:20am
neysbo wrote:
Sorry , my computer or internet connection is messed up and it is real slow and I must have hit submit twice
Motodude wrote:
Still using dial up on your 486 huh. Talk about outdated.
ha , there are days it seems like it.
ktmdan
Posts
1226
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Houston, TX US
10/21/2009 10:43am
BUTCH wrote:
I never really understood why they all went Aluminum frames. Since day one they never saved any weight doing so.
I heard the OEMs found they could buy the aluminum in bulk cheaper than the steel (chromoly, w.e.).
ando
Posts
4114
Joined
8/20/2009
Location
Perth AU
10/21/2009 1:24pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 2:52am
Aluminium has no mechanical advantage over steel for a motorbike frame - in rough terms it's about 1/3 the weight but only 1/3 third the strength and stiffness, so to get an aluminium frame with similar strength and stiffness you have to use three times as much material and bingo, your weight advantage has disappeared...

Also you have to design the aluminium frame with a much larger section hence the 2-3 inch wide main spars on aluminium frames compared to say 1 -2 inch steel tube.

As Butch pointed out dirtbikes haven't gotten any lighter with aluminium frames.

I daresay there are other reasons why the manufacturers went with alloy - perhaps cheaper (steel has increase a lot in the last 5-10 years compared to aluminium), doesn't rust, you eliminate the need to paint the frame therefore saving on manufacturing costs.


BTW you guys are all missing the last "i" in Aluminium... Wink
Lightning78
Posts
6353
Joined
12/12/2007
Location
Huntington Beach, CA US
10/21/2009 2:35pm
I actually do believe steel frames allow the bikes to handle better and the rigidity of the aluminum units transfer a lot more bumps and such to the riders body plus in turns they feel like they want to wash a little easier likely due to lack of flex. The only time I feel the aluminum frames have an advantage is from hard landings they seem to stay going in a straight line better and don't deflect after a slam, a tradeoff im happy to give up.

KTM's bikes are the lightest bikes avail and that did it with a STEEL (chromoly) frame? How can this be????? Just because you are told to believe something doesn't mean it's true...... I prefer stell over aluminium any day especially after riding them back to back. KTM must see the benefits in their design

KMC440
Posts
7764
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
10/21/2009 2:59pm
With the "fix-improvement" to the EFI why would you still have an electric start?

BUTCH
Posts
5088
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
WA US
10/21/2009 3:09pm
KMC440 wrote:
With the "fix-improvement" to the EFI why would you still have an electric start?

That a good question.
ML512
Posts
16855
Joined
12/28/2008
Location
Wildomar, CA US
Fantasy
10/21/2009 3:15pm
ML512 wrote:
Can someone remind me what they name of the material ktm uses for the frames is i know its not just plain steel, its called ____...
Can someone remind me what they name of the material ktm uses for the frames is i know its not just plain steel, its called ____ ? Something alloy? I can't remember Dizzy
sdfog1 wrote:
Chromoly?
i remembered right after i posted this, but thank you that is what it is!
ktmdan
Posts
1226
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Houston, TX US
10/21/2009 3:19pm
ando wrote:
Aluminium has no mechanical advantage over steel for a motorbike frame - in rough terms it's about 1/3 the weight but only 1/3 third the strength...
Aluminium has no mechanical advantage over steel for a motorbike frame - in rough terms it's about 1/3 the weight but only 1/3 third the strength and stiffness, so to get an aluminium frame with similar strength and stiffness you have to use three times as much material and bingo, your weight advantage has disappeared...

Also you have to design the aluminium frame with a much larger section hence the 2-3 inch wide main spars on aluminium frames compared to say 1 -2 inch steel tube.

As Butch pointed out dirtbikes haven't gotten any lighter with aluminium frames.

I daresay there are other reasons why the manufacturers went with alloy - perhaps cheaper (steel has increase a lot in the last 5-10 years compared to aluminium), doesn't rust, you eliminate the need to paint the frame therefore saving on manufacturing costs.


BTW you guys are all missing the last "i" in Aluminium... Wink
aluminum is more along the lines of 1/3 the weight of steel and 1/2 the strength.
Moto_Z
Posts
12
Joined
11/27/2008
Location
US
10/22/2009 11:00am



Mike Alessi, on what looks like the new KTM 350.

Photo courtesy of ChrisWorden's galleries.
chase187
Posts
331
Joined
9/29/2009
Location
Hallsville, MO US
10/22/2009 11:11am
Looks like a 250f, I would believe the 350f would have linkage
Kinetic1
Posts
2796
Joined
6/4/2009
Location
Gun Lake, MI US
10/22/2009 11:24am
Steel is also more durable over time than aluminium. Aluminium will crack with repeated stress. Steel will also but at much greater stresses over a longer period of time.

KTM is still testing the linkage. Mike and Tony said in the podcast that Mike rode both bikes for testing purposes. Personally the lack of linkage is one of the things that draws me to KTM in the first place.

Post a reply to: nem ktm 350

The Latest